All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 11, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:56
November 11, 2016, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Man, I've been having trouble all day.
I cannot find a cigar.
I can't find a cigar that draws right.
I got this new tool in there that you screw in there, call a perfect draw.
No T in there, P-E-R-F-E-C perfect draw.
And I still can't get them to draw right.
I'm having to really suck on these babies to get some smoke out of them, and that could lead to a hernia, but man, am I in a great mood about it, for I can't tell you live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Yes, sir, we here we are, Open Line Friday, the wrap-up to an epic and historic week in a country.
And here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
I want to thank all of you who have signed up and become subscribers at Rushlimbaugh.com, Rush 24-7.
We have set a record with the number of subscribers we went over to top this week.
And I want to assure all of you, those of you who have uh newly signed up, you are going to absolutely love Rushlimbod.com.
It is a living breathing online encyclopedia.
And that just is the part that documents what I say.
It is just literally a one-stop shop for the acquisition of knowledge about things that uh that you care about and fun and uh entertaining as well.
Rush Limbaugh, you got Ditto Cam here.
We have podcasts of the program available 30 minutes after the program every day.
You can download from the site or from iTunes.
We don't talk about the podcast much, but we did when it was new, but the podcasts uh we were the leaders.
When Steve Jobs first announced podcasts that were going to be made available via iTunes in one of his keynote addresses.
There it was right up there, Rush Limbaugh, as one of the originating podcast providers.
People noticed it, thought it was odd, but we made it, and and we've been uh trailblazing in this regard ever since.
The uh podcasts can contain no commercials, and they come in three files, once for each one for each hour.
And uh so you can uh if you miss the program, you can always find it.
The the the app, uh, rushlimbaugh.com app allows you to listen to the program live via streaming or watch it via the ditto cam if you are a subscriber, meaning we televise the program.
Uh which it's just a camera there recording what's going on in here.
We don't do anything particularly special.
There's no TV switcher, or we don't do video to the audio sound bites that we play.
But if you're watching, you're watching to watch me, and that's what you get.
We also have the uh digitized version now of the Limbaugh Letter, which is also set subscription records uh during this campaign, and I I could not be more thankful and grateful to all of you because not just for the obvious reasons, but the the more people that are exposed to what happens here, the more informed country we're gonna have, which has always been the objective here.
You know, inform people, let them go out and vote.
Inform people, let them go out and be citizens, inform people and let them participate.
Inform people, and you can be confident about what they're gonna do.
And this election has proven it, has shown it.
You know, uh did you let me a couple quick stories.
Do you hear about this uh this blow up at the Democrat National Committee?
Is this great?
Donna Brazil still runs the Democrat National Committee.
She walks on stage, dripping in shame, except she doesn't know it.
None of them feel any shame over there yet because they're blaming everybody but themselves and the long knives are starting to come out for Hillary now.
But mostly they're still blaming me.
Mostly they're still blaming us.
They're blaming Trump voters as being racists and misogynists and sexists.
Did you hear what the commissioner of the NFL said?
Grab this soundbite.
I wasn't gonna get to this until later, but since I mentioned it here, it is audio soundbite number 19.
Yesterday New York City New York Times Deal Book conference, you talk a place about a place melting down.
The New York Times.
Wait till you hear some of the headlines in the New York Times today.
David Brooks, the conservative colonist of the New York Times, tells everybody not to worry about it because Trump's either going to resign or be impeached in the first year.
There's nothing to worry about.
Trump doesn't have the attention span, the intelligence, or the interest to really do this.
You talk about denial.
It's incredible.
These are supposedly the smartest people among us.
Here's Goodell.
He was asked by uh to Andrew Ross Ross.
There's a bunch of Sorkins out there, and I get them confused.
But this is Andrew Ross Sarkin talking to Roger Goodell, a commissioner of the national football in question.
The coarseness of the Donald Trump campaign, the comments he made about women, and other things.
Does that make your job as commissioner harder?
It makes my job harder at home, too.
I have twin daughters and a wife, and so you know I have to explain that to them.
So that's yes, on that front.
Does it make it harder publicly?
Listen, I think our country has to have more respect for one another.
And we have to unite.
And I saw some very positive signs of that yesterday with our current president, um, Hillary Clinton's comments publicly and others coming together and saying, we have to get together.
We have to unite.
We have to address some of the issues and work together.
What this was about, you know, the NFL is in in undergoing a spate of domestic violence.
And by the way, that's been happening before Trump was elected.
I mean, it had a spate of Ray Rice dragging his knocked-out wife off the elevator, the kicker for the New York Giants.
Now there's another guy.
I mean, it's it's rampant out there, and Goodell's saying that Trump being elected's gonna make it harder for the NFL to combat domestic violence.
It's hilarious.
But it's ridiculous.
The election of Donald Trump, look at the presumptions that go into everything.
But he's what I was going to tell you, the Donna Brazil story.
She struts on stage for a post-mortem meeting, a Democrat National Committee to discuss what went wrong.
And she starts telling everybody how great things are, they're going to start putting things back together, and they weren't buying it.
And this kid, a young kid, member of the Democrat National Committee named Zach, stands up and starts heckling her.
And tells her that she's an old biddy, basically, and she's gonna die of old age, and he's gonna die 40 years before his life expectancy because of climate change.
And while that's hit it is hilarious, it got me, you know, I think deeply about a lot of these things because I care about people.
I really do care, folks.
Bottom of my sizable beating heart.
Boo-boom, ba-boom, ba-boom.
I care that the Democrat Party, through its fear-mongering, has so misinformed people and literally created the walking dead.
We have the walking fearful, and they're every this guy literally believes, I've been trying to tell you that these young millennials think that the planet is not going to be able to support human life by the time they hit 65.
Now, who could possibly make them believe this?
It has to be the Democrat Party, it has to be the fearmonger, and the Democrat Party doesn't believe it.
This is the shame of it.
Donna Brazil doesn't believe it climate change is destroying the planet and that it's gonna shorten everybody's life.
She just says it because fear mongering is how they keep people in line.
Fear monking is how they engender support, and they make people afraid of everything.
And we now have, I don't know what percentage of the population literally quaking in fear over the election of somebody that's not a Democrat, literally in fear.
They are terribly frightened, really, really afraid, folks.
I'm not exaggerating here.
And the people who have made them feel this way have lied to them.
They don't live and walk around in this kind of fear.
They use the fear-mongering to scare these people into party loyalty.
It is also a way of defaming the opposition.
But look at how easy it apparently has been.
Roger Goodell, the commissioner of the National Football League thinks the election of Donald Trump is going to make his league have a greater challenge with domestic.
Why?
Does it mean the election of Trump is sending a signal to the players in the NFL that somehow it's okay to go out and beat your wife?
What can this possibly mean?
But you have to stop and pause and realize these people are serious.
I say it again.
They started talking this way back in the early 90s, and back then we all laughed.
I mean, we had some of the greatest parody bits, some of the greatest satire bits, laughing at this stuff and making fun of it on the premise that nobody would believe this other than extreme kooks.
And little did we know their mainstream was sopping it up and believing every syllable of it.
And then voting on it.
Two things: Obama did his final Veterans Day appearance at Arlington National Cemetery today.
And the media, of course, made a big deal about that.
So Obama's last it's going to be a lot of Obama lasts coming up that they're going to be crying tears over.
And the media is, and this was one of them today.
Grab audio sound by number 20.
I mean, this, I think, captures and encapsulates yet another set of challenges that we have.
Because I really would like to be able, I don't know if I can do it.
I haven't really thought about how.
I really would like to be able to get to all these young people who really think that climate change is shortening their life.
I'd love to get to them somehow and tell them they don't have anything to worry about.
I would love to be able to convince them that what they're worried about isn't happening.
And that even if it were, we couldn't stop it because we're not causing it because we don't have this kind of power.
And I would love to try to convince them that this is not what progress means.
Progress doesn't mean you die early.
Progress doesn't mean your environment gets destroyed.
Progress doesn't mean that you lose your opportunity for success.
Look at what they've been made to believe.
Look how they have been programmed.
So listen to Obama at Arlington.
Now, this is Veterans Day.
And we are honoring the members of the United States military who have died in service to their country.
Here's what Obama...
This is one of the excerpts of his remarks.
Veterans Day often follows a hard-fought political campaign.
An exercise in the free speech and self-government that you fought for.
It often lays bare disagreements across our nation.
But the American instinct has never been to find isolation in opposite corners.
It is to find strength in our common creed, to forge unity from our great diversity, to sustain that strength and unity, even when it is hard.
The key word for me there as I listen to this is diversity.
Because the president also said the following in his remarks.
He said that the United States military is the single most diverse institution in America.
Now, to those of us, say the baby boom generation, well, some of us, the baby boom generation, it doesn't mean anything.
Diversity has nothing to do with merit.
Diversity has nothing to do with quality, diversity has nothing to do with how well you do your job.
Diversity has nothing to do with anything except surface window dressing.
And yet it is a defining, dominant characteristic as far as these people are concerned.
They could put together the absolute worst military a nation's ever had, but if it was diverse, if it had the right number of groups of people in it, it would be considered the best.
When the Rangers were repelling up the cliffs at Poinduho at Omaha Beach on D Day, I don't think anybody was the slightest concerned about the diversity of anybody involved.
At the top was the enemy, the Germans, and everybody in the Rangers was on the same team, and they loved their buddies, and it didn't matter who they were.
But where does this whole diversity pitch originate?
Where does it come from?
It's classic.
It is telltale.
It is highly instructive of how liberals think and how liberalism is destructive, and chips away at the idea of merit.
There has to be a presumption in order to arrive at the belief that diversity is good.
And I'll tell you what it is.
It's the same thing that Van Jones was talking about when he's wringing his hands and crying and moaning about the white lash that was this election.
I'm telling you, these people believe that the white population of this country, which has been the majority since the days of the founding, is inherently corrupt.
They believe the white majority, which is largely Christian, is also corrupt because of religion and because of skin color.
In other words, they believe the majority of this country has always been racist and bigoted.
And so it must be chipped away at, it must be destroyed, and it must be properly categorized.
And one of the ways that they have chosen to chip away at this whole presumption that the majority is a bunch of racist bigots is to promote this diversity business and to simply say that anybody non-white makes something better.
Whether it does or not.
That's what they're saying.
We're going to make things better by reducing the numbers of white people.
We're going to make things better by reducing the numbers of majority, and we're going to start sprinkling diversity in there.
And it doesn't matter.
In whatever endeavor we're talking about, whether the new members of whatever diversity club you're assembling, whether any good or not, that doesn't matter.
It's simply about appearance.
But it's about much more than that.
Because this is the route.
It's part of the route.
It's part of the technique for chipping away at the very founding of the country and capitalism and the systems that have given us and produce that we have produced the greatest superpower the world has ever known.
So on one hand, yeah, I mean, nothing wrong with having people of all walks of life in the military, but to claim that the greatness of the military is defined by that is dangerous.
Because it isn't.
It's dangerous to claim that a police department, a fire department, a college faculty, the more diverse, the better.
No, it's it's it's like if you're disagreeing with me, how about this?
They love to say they're not enough women in the Senate.
Therefore, women are not being properly represented.
Do you believe that?
If you believe that, then you you believe you don't believe in unity.
You don't you cannot believe in unity if you think only blacks can represent blacks, only Asians and only Hispanics and only women.
If you believe that, then you don't believe in unity.
You can't possibly.
You can't even want it.
But you're really short-changing your fellow human beings if you believe that they are that bigoted, that incompetent, and that racist, and whatever else they would have to be for people to be unable to fairly and equally before the law with the eyes of the Constitution represent people who don't look like them.
It's absurd, but this is where we are.
But for the left, in the process of getting here, this is where they start lying to people about things like climate change.
They lie.
You know how many women are running around?
I got a story today.
A woman writing a piece.
Make sure you go grab as much birth control as you can today, because Donald Trump's going to take yours away from you.
Donald Trump thinks you should pay for your own birth control.
He's going to destroy Obama here.
Donald Trump doesn't want you to be able to control your body.
As I say, 20 years ago, we see this, and we would laugh ourselves silly until we realized they believe it.
Anyway, all kinds of these examples, folks, All kinds of fun awaits you on the other side of each of our obscene profit timeouts.
I saw a Facebook post from Mr. Newt that I want to share with you because I think it's great.
Newt Gingrich posted the following The eight years, the eight years of Donald J. Trump are going to be among the most extraordinary, the most inventive, the most exciting periods in all of American political history.
President Trump will not only make America great again, but also drain the swamp in Washington and move our systems into the 21st century to provide dramatically better experiences for every American.
That is clearly the hope.
That is clearly what people voted for and desperately hope happens.
Newt is close to Trump.
Newt spends time with Trump.
Newt posting this on Facebook means he's confident that that's exactly what Trump is going to do.
We are looking at the next eight years as being extraordinary, inventive, exciting, and it's going to be hard to contain our thrills.
By the way, Donald Trump won Arizona.
That's 11 more electoral votes.
And in addition to that, the French news agency is reporting these are the kind of bits of information you're gonna have to really hunt for.
Trump fared perfectly fine with women.
He did perfectly well with women.
He did it exactly as Romney did with women, both college educated and non-college educated.
All of this pre-election hyperbole that women hated Trump, that Trump had a gender gap that he couldn't overcome, and an Hispanic gap that he could.
None of it was true.
None of it was true.
Oh, reminds me, I want to address something.
I've been asked this uh two or three times, even though I addressed it yesterday.
I made mention of something I think is true yesterday.
Uh pollsters are out asking themselves, how in the world could we have missed this?
And I don't think they did.
I think they didn't miss it, they just didn't tell us what they were actually finding.
They couldn't.
It was so opposite what they wanted.
And polling data has been weaponized.
It's used to make opinion, it's used to shape public opinion, not reflect it.
And I've I'm I'm convinced if you look at the polling data that you can find over sample in Democrats, you can find that they knew what was going on.
They just wanted to be able to report things that did not reflect what was going on.
They didn't miss anything.
The drive-by's they're all claiming now that well, we gonna we don't know about these people in the Midwest.
We don't know about BS, they know all this.
It's just what they think of those people.
They don't respect them, they don't give them the time of day, they think they're not full humans because they don't have the right educational pedigree or what have you, but they know who they are.
I mean, after all, the Democrat Party portrays itself all these years as the party of the little guy.
We know who that they know who they are.
They know who the economically disadvantaged are.
This effort to make it look like they missed something, it's they didn't miss anything.
They either didn't tell us what they knew or they disregarded what they knew as irrelevant.
But about Obama's approval rating, and I did address this yesterday, people ask me, Rush, doesn't it mean his approval rating of 53 or 55% is also a lie?
Maybe, but not necessarily.
It could go one of two ways.
You could easily say, and you wouldn't get any arguments from people, that if the polling data on the presidential race was wrong, and if they missed it, and if all of the news they were reporting was wrong and purposely skewed, then doesn't it follow that what they're telling us Obama's approval rating is also a lie?
And using that logical progression, you could easily make the case that yeah, but it might be real.
In one sense, we know that Obama's policies were sent packing.
We know that the Democrat Party's agenda was blown to smithereens by the voters of this country on election day.
Barack Obama put his agenda on the ballot.
He went out and campaigned for Hillary Clinton and said that his legacy was at stake, and he urged people to vote for him to protect his accomplishments and his agenda.
They can't now run and say, well, Obama's agenda wasn't on it, he didn't run it.
It was, and he put it there.
And it got shellacked.
There is no two ways about it.
There's no other way that candy coat this.
The Barack Obama agenda was blown to Smitterines.
Specifically, defeated.
So how can he have a 53% approval rating?
Well, if a pollster asks a voter, do you approve of the job the president's doing or not?
It makes perfect sense to me that voters would not want to encounter a pollster mad at them for disapproving Obama, because the pollster might say it's racist or whatever.
The easiest thing to do is say yeah.
But if you ask those people, do you approve of what Obama is done with health care?
You'll get a truthful end.
No, I don't.
Do you approve of or do you support and then name another Obama policy?
And you'll get no, we're not in favor of this at all.
We're not in favor of Obamacare.
We're not in favor of the stimulus pack.
We're not in favor.
You take the policy.
Do you agree or disagree with Obama's use of execution?
No, we don't like it at all.
You take him out of the question, and people tell you the truth, what they think of his agenda.
You put him in the question, and it could well be that people will tell pollsters that they approve of Obama.
I really think that his race has had a drastic effect on this country in terms of paralyzing legitimate opposition.
It has literally paralyzed legitimate opposition, the fear of any opposition being immediately tagged as insincere and just simple bigotry and racism has shut people up.
It has shut them down.
We there we we can't turn back the hands of time, but we didn't have to go through these eight years.
Obama could have been defeated.
We know this now.
And one of the things that I really hope materializes here is a newfound confidence in what we believe and that it is a winner.
That if presented compassionately and cheerfully and positively, it is a winner.
The days of Republicans having to make excuses for what they believe should be long gone now.
We'll see if that happens.
But it ought to.
There ought be no guilt.
There ought be no reservation, there ought to be no fear.
What there ought to be is an utter confidence and a desire or a an opportunity to bring people along with us and to expand the number of people who agree and understand what we're talking about.
But not be afraid of what we think and not be I never have been, but we, you know that countless people aren't.
I really think the fact that the historical nature of Obama's presidency, given the first African Americans, paralyzed all kinds of legitimate opposition, silenced it or what have you.
Now, folks, if you will indulge me for just a few more moments, um I haven't had a chance to tout this week because of the required and desired focus on the election, the results and what they all mean.
But right before the election, I released the latest Rush Revere Time Travel Adventures with the exceptional American series, uh book number five, Rush Revere and the Presidency.
These are books written for young people, telling the truth about American history.
And it has been one of the most, by the way, Snerdley interviewed me yesterday for the next issue of the limbaughetter.
I say, who better to put all this in context than me?
So Sternley interviewed me and he asked me about the book series and what it's meant.
And in terms of reaching a new group of people, young people and their parents, the opportunity to counter some of the propaganda they're being taught disguised as American history in school.
It's just been an incredible Experience, and it was an exciting thing to tackle when the idea first occurred to me.
And so we've in three years now, this is book number five.
And these are books, hardcover books, they're not picture books.
They are legitimate novel-like books, but they are about American history, but they're unique in that it's not just a rote description of America.
For example, in Rush Revere and the Presidency.
We have a great vehicle.
We have a talking horse named Liberty who has the ability to time travel.
We have a substitute teacher named Rush Revere.
That's me.
And Rush Revere gets on Liberty and takes some students from his history class and they time travel back to events in American history.
Liberty can only go backward and only to American history.
Can't go to the future, none of that.
And so we've got a student in this book running for school class president, Cam.
And he's having all kinds of trouble with it.
He's he's doing it for the wrong reasons.
He's doing it to be popular, he wants to be perceived as cool.
He doesn't really have an agenda for being school class president.
He just wants the accolades, just wants to get noticed.
And Rush Revere is very alarmed about this.
So suggest that we all time travel back and talk to George Washington, the first president of this country, and ask him what it meant to him, why he did it, everything about it that we could research historically and write in a way that the age group for which these books are written would understand it and like it.
And that's what this book is.
The first one was Rush Revere and the Great Pilgrims.
It was about the pilgrims arriving and what they went through and what happened as a result and the relationship pilgrims had in the founding of the country.
Anyway, they're just going gangbusters on RushRevere.com website is just receiving countless, hundreds of thousands of feedback posts and emails, people sending photographs of their kids unboxing the book when Amazon delivers it.
Kids dressing up as characters in the book.
None of this stuff we ever dreamed would happen.
But it is it has taken off, and I just I haven't had a chance to mention it much because the election has taken priority, but we now have this book out, Rush Rush Revere and the Presidency, and it's book five, and it's available for pre-order now.
Comes out toward the uh the end of the month, just in time for Christmas.
And it's especially timing uh timeful now, relevant because it's about that.
We we intended it to come out near the election, but not knowing what would happen in the election.
So the focus is really on the presidency and how it developed as part of the founding, and how the morality of George Washington was paramount, because even we had fought the war with the British and we had achieved our independence, and we didn't want to live under tyranny.
Washington was so popular, people begged him to be queen, and it was his morality that refused it.
Said, nope, I don't want to be king.
I eventually want to go back to my home in Mount Vernon.
I'll do this because people want it.
The whole book is, well, not a whole book, but a large part of the book is Cam and the students going back in time and learning from George Washington about the president, the first presidency, the real presidency, and you see the metamorphosis that the young student goes through as he learns the import of it, even though it's just for class president.
So it's out now, Rush Revere and the Presidency, Book Five and the Rush Revere Time Travel Adventures with exceptional American series.
So many people on our side have worked so hard.
It takes a group of us to do these because there's the historical research, there are the illustrations, there are photographs that we get and permissions for.
There's the layout of this.
There are people who review my writing to make sure that it's for the age group, and it will be comprehended and understood.
Uh my wife Catherine pours her heart and soul into every one of these books, and she did this one.
So I appreciate you giving me a few minutes here to tell you about it since we we released it last week, and everything has been taking prior.
Well, it shot up, Snerdley's asking, where did it end up?
It shot up to number one on Amazon the first day we announced it.
It it took about three hours to get there, but it shot up to number one on Amazon.
Thank you for reminding me of that, uh, Mr. Snerdley.
But it's it's there, it's available for pre-order now.
I'm gonna take a brief time out again.
Thank you for indulging me while I tell you about this.
So we're really proud of it.
And in addition to the books being fun to read, there's a purpose here.
There's a mission.
And that is to just teach the miracle that is the greatness of the founding of this country.
It's no more complicated than that.
We will be right back.
Going to start with your phone calls, because it's Friday, so sit tight.
By the way, one other thing I want to mention, I forgot to mention this.
We really spend a lot of time on Martha Washington and Abigail Adams, George Washington, John Adams are both featured in Rush Revere in the Presidency.
But we we know we have a lot of young girls that read these books and the wives, George Washington, Abigail Adams was a force of nature in her own right, and was with Martha Washington.
And in the early days of the country, not much is written about them, but we delved into the relationships that George and Martha Washington had and that John and Abigail Adams had as it related to their their pursuits in the founding of the country, because we wanted the readers of the books to understand that the the wives of these great men were fundamentally important to their achievement.
And so for those of you who have uh little girls in your family, these books, this one is well, all of them, but this one especially does not leave women out of the founding.
It doesn't do it in a feminist way.
This is just it's done in a human way.
These women were the wives of these great men, and they had a lot to do with the greatness of these men, and we researched it and included as much of it as we could that was relevant to the story we were trying to tell.
I wanted to make sure everybody understood that.
We start on the phones on Open Line Friday in Indianapolis with Andrew.
You're up first, sir.
It's great to have you.
How are you doing?
It's great to talk to you.
Thank you, Ross.
You bet, sir.
I wanted to to draw a parallel between you and Donald Trump and your success.
You both are very funny people.
And I don't think that either of you have achieved the success you're having without such a great sense of humor.
I mean, you do it in such a beautiful and subtle way.
With uh little jabs in the imitations and the parodies, and it just makes it so fun to listen to, and I think that's why you have so many listeners.
Same thing with Donald Trump.
People go and line up and he gets 20,000, 30,000 people, and they're there to support him, but he's funny and they have a good time.
You know, you you are very shrewd.
There's a a passage that is that's gone viral out there, written by our old friend Selena Zito.
She wrote a piece, this one was for the Atlantic, and she said that the problem is that Trump, people that oppose Trump, don't take him seriously, but take him literally.
Trump supporters take him seriously, but not literally, which means they know when he's joking with them.
They know when he's having fun.
A Trump, somebody who opposes Trump is so wound so tight that they don't, they're not funny people anyway.
They don't get his humor.
They don't think he's being they really believe when he tells these jokes that that's dead serious stuff.
And you are very, very right.
There's not enough laughter on the left.
Even their comedians are angry.
They're comedians, they're the the humor they they shoot for is all personal put down kind of humor.
Where it used to not be that way.
But Trump's humor, uh, even the stuff that's not subtle, they miss.
They they take it, they take it literally and are frightened to death by it.
It's incredible.
Absolutely.
And I think when the other side tries to be funny, they just appear more angry.
You hear Hillary Clinton talking about Trump rating Statue of Liberty a four or five on a good day or something.
That just turns people off, in my opinion.
Yeah, but see, here's the problem with with with comedy.
Real comedy, real humor, as I have said many, many times, has to have.
It must have a grain of truth.
If it doesn't, it's gonna fall flat.
And rating the Statue of Liberty, it doesn't connect.
It it's not funny because if anybody would be thinking about that with a Statue of Liberty, it'd be Bill Clinton.
It was Bill Clinton once said, Hey, you know, if that mummy, if that mummy weren't 500 years old, I might take her out.
It was Bill Clinton that said that.
Look at a mummy fine 500-year-old woman commenting on her attractment.
Hey, uh, let me ask you a question.
Andrew, would you like a new iPhone 7 or iPhone 7 Plus?
Oh, I would love one.
Yeah.
What carrier do you use?
I use ATT.
ATT.
7 Plus or 7?
7.
Okay.
Hang on.
You'll have it sometime either tomorrow or Monday.
Don't hang up so we get your address to FedEx it to you.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
We have more hilarious examples of meltdowns on the part of leftists and liberal Democrats.
More evidence that the protests taking place are coordinated, organized.
People are being bussed in to the protest sites.
10-15 buses in a row bringing them in.
▲
Export Selection