All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:25
November 10, 2016, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings, my friends.
Welcome back.
Uh Rush Limbaugh here, the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, a telephone number if you want to join us.
800-282-2882.
I just I'm just looking at the audio soundbite roster.
And sure as can be, here I am, NBC Nightly News, Limbaugh on Defense Against White Lash.
I I haven't heard these yet.
CBS Evening News place Rush Limbaugh to represent half of mythical divided radio universe, whatever that is.
David Axelrod, did you see what Axarod said on he was a ladies and gentlemen?
I am feeling wonderful and great, but I will never stop being ticked off at the left.
And I don't think anybody should stop being wary, suspicious, and constantly vigilant of these people.
How many times, let's look back to the last time when there was a major, major Republican victory, it was the House of Representatives sweep in the 1994 midterm elections, first time we'd won the House since 40 years.
And in about two years that victory had been squandered in in the sense of producing victories.
I mean, we maintained control of the House, but producing victories, balancing budgets, whatever was on the contract with America agenda.
And I developed a theory.
I think that a mistake was made back in 1994.
The Republicans who won, Newt Gingrich and the contract with America, I think they misread what their victory meant.
I think they mistakenly concluded that their victory meant the country had gone conservative.
And as such, they stopped explaining what they were doing and why.
Essentially, they stopped teaching.
And it was easy for the left to lie about who they were and what they were doing.
And it wasn't long before the Republicans were starving kids in the school lunch program.
Shortly after winning the House in 1994, by 1995, in that budget, we were starving kids.
And the left was having kids write letters to members of the Republican House saying, You're starving me, I can't learn when I'm hungry.
And there weren't any budget cuts in the school lunch program.
We stopped teaching.
I folks, we have a this is this victory is the greatest opportunity of my life.
The Democrat Party is the weakest it is, and they know it.
They know full well what has happened to them since Barack Obama became president in terms of how their party has just been shellacked, and I'm telling you that makes me happy.
You don't know how ecstatic I am.
They have lost all of these seats, they've lost their power, six million fewer Democrats showing up to vote for Hillary than voted for Obama in in 2012.
We have a the opportunity of a lifetime to put the brakes on the forces of the left that want to transform this country and destroy its health care system, destroy the education system, the chip away at individual liberty and freedom of every citizen by growing government.
We've got a chance to close the borders.
We have a chance to end rampant immigration into this country by people who we don't know, we don't know whether they love the country or not.
We have no idea.
They're not educated, they don't speak the language, we make no attempt to assimilate them.
Issue after issue after issue that resulted in Donald Trump winning.
We have an opportunity to really win.
One of the problems I have, folks, and one of the reasons, one of the things guiding me here is I have seen victory after victory squandered.
We have people on our side who don't think victories possible, who really don't think it's possible to beat back the left.
They think it's possible to stop them periodically, temporarily, but they don't think it's possible to beat them.
I know them.
I don't want to have to name names, but you would recognize them all.
This program, as I said yesterday, aside from whatever else it must be to succeed within the broadcast business.
The reason I do what I do outside of those requirements is beat the left.
That's what we've been trying to do.
I've been trying to do for 29 years here.
Well, 28 and counting is beat the left by informing people who they are.
By helping to create election results like we had on Tuesday.
And don't succeed all the time.
Plenty of failures in there.
Um to whatever extent I want to take the blame or credit for whoever wins or loses elections, I try to distance myself from that sense because I'm not on the ballot, and I'm not in charge of anybody's campaign, so it's difficult for me to claim credit or blame.
But I do devote practically all the energy I have here into educating people about those I think are the enemies of what we want our country to be.
They have a different view of what they want this country to be, and it's rooted in the fact that they don't like this country as founded, and I do.
I love it, and I think it's a miracle, a God blessed miracle that deserves every effort to preserve it.
We have the greatest chance that we've ever had, and I'm just telling you, I'm trying to share with you, you don't have to work at remembering these things, but I do if I'm to be considered good at what I do here.
And I can't tell you the red flags when I see all this talk of unity, and then I see everything I predicted, these protests that we know are bought and paid for, they're not organic, they're not legitimate.
When I say they're not legitimate, I mean they're people protesting, yeah.
And they're burning flags, yeah.
But they're being paid to do it.
And it's made to look like this country is fed up with Donald Trump over it.
It's made to look like this country is livid and outraged over the election result when it isn't.
The country is happy.
We are ecstatic over the outcome of the election.
It's the left that isn't happy.
It's the left that's never happy.
It's the left that's trying to intimidate you and manipulate you, and I'm trying to help you spot it so you can resist it.
I'm trying to alert you to their tactics, to tell you how they go about doing what they do, from lying about polling data to misrepresenting over 80% of the people in this country and how they think and what's important to them.
Establishment versus ruling class, the whole business is meant to get everybody, as many people as I can reach to understand what we are up against.
I think their previous caller is ticked off that I'm ticked off at the left, if you want to know the truth.
That's who I'm if I'm angry and if I sound angry, it's because I'm angry at the left because I'm ticked off at this this this call for unity.
And I get a little ticked off when I hear some Republicans start talking about, yeah, we need to come together now.
We don't need to come together, we beat them.
Did that sound mad?
Did that sound mad when I said that?
We don't need to come together right now.
Because we beat their ass.
So we don't, folks, we don't need to unify.
We need to blast them a smithy.
Yeah, isn't it great?
How's that?
How's that?
Oh, I can't.
I'm just be a wonderful thing.
Just the final uh hammer the final nails in the coffin of liberalism.
Oh, yeah, man, bring it on!
Unity!
Eat this!
Swallow this!
Screw your unity!
You lost!
Ha ha!
How's that?
Okay.
David Axelrod.
And get audio soundbite number uh 25 standing by.
I was uh at home last night, as I usually am minding my own business, and I get a note.
David Axarod's Talking about you on TV.
You know, I had to write back saying what?
What do you say?
Reminding everybody how you said you hoped Obama failed.
I said, I knew it.
You know what I think, folks?
You want to hear what I think.
I think Obama and Hillary's calls for magnanimity are phony.
I don't think they mean it.
I don't think they believe it at all.
They're ticked.
Don't you understand how mad they are?
Holy cow.
Obama just said everything he stands for.
He just stands right back down his little throat.
You think he's happy and smiling about it?
He's mad as and Hillary, she was gonna be the queen.
Oh, I just love seeing it in my mind.
She was gonna be Queen Hillary's gonna be coronation.
And look what happened.
She has to swallow the rope line with with with the hoomah as they leave the hall.
Oh, and now they then go out and they talk about how we need to work together.
Donald Trump, he's a great American, and we need to come together, and we need to work together to put America back together.
I was suspicious of that when I heard it, and then when I heard it, Axelrod's on TV reminding everybody that I said I hope he fails.
I do not doubt for a minute, I really don't, that they had a strategy session and they said went out there.
Look, we're gonna use limbaugh again.
And we're gonna contrast ourselves to Limbaugh.
Limbaugh's out there, he said he hoped Obama fails, and we're gonna go out there, we're gonna be so much better than Limbo.
We're gonna look like we care about unity and we're gonna win this thing back.
You and so they went out and did it.
You don't think so.
All right, well, here's a little bit of Obama this afternoon at the White House, after he had his meeting with Trump, or I guess the end of the meeting with Trump.
And I think when I said I hope he failed, by the way, they all know what I meant.
And even Axlrod was told last night.
No, no.
Limbo didn't want the country to fail.
He wanted the agenda to fail.
Limbaugh didn't want socialism to win.
That's what he meant.
They knew that.
Everybody knows what I meant.
They just take the occasion of what I said to misrepresent it, lie about it and so forth.
But here's Obama.
You tell me that that is still not on his mind.
I believe that it is important for all of us, regardless of party, and regardless of political preferences, to now come together, work together.
Stop the tape.
You think he believes that, folks?
If you do, I've got a lake in Michigan, I'm gonna buy today and sell you tomorrow.
Do you really believe it's important for us, regardless of party and political to come together?
It's just the guy that told Trump he's the KKK.
This is a guy telling me Trump doesn't have the temperament to be president.
This is the guy who's out there lying through his teeth.
You really think now that they've lost that they want to come to start it from the top again if I can handle it again.
I believe that it is important for all of us, regardless of party, and regardless of political preferences, to now come together, work together to deal with uh the many challenges that we face.
Uh and in the meantime, Michelle has had a chance to uh greet the incoming first lady, and uh we had uh uh an excellent uh conversation with her as well.
And we want to make sure that they feel welcome uh as they prepare uh to make this transition.
And most of all, uh I want to uh emphasize to you listen, Ms. President elect, listen, uh we now are gonna want to do everything we can to help you succeed, because if you succeed, then the country succeeds.
It's still on his mind.
If you succeed, then the country succeeds.
That is a direct repudiation of I hope he fails.
And here he is, he's talking to Trump, and he's saying, uh, no, I won't emphasize you, uh, Mr. President Electric, we we we we not.
We are.
We we're gonna want to do everything.
We can't help you sleep.
They're not.
Come on.
Fuck everything.
They're already plotting ways to get Trump's plane with flap tires and anything else they can do to interrupt where Trump's gonna don't believe not.
Greetings and welcome back, El Rushbow and the cutting edge.
I'm beginning to think, Mr. Sturdly that our first caller, Seminar caller.
I actually I'm beginning now to think that it's all part of the sham that they are running here.
Uh to try to disaffect the actual energy that is there because of this victory and to misportray it so forth.
I've no doubt now this guy was a uh seminar caller.
Anyway, here we have the audio sound bites of Axelrod, because I'm not mad.
I'm mad at the left when I should be, and that's what made him mad.
The reason he's seminar caller is I was effectively exposing the left, and that's what he had to call it shut down or try.
I do.
And I'll tell you why I do.
It's because I've had email some others that say the same thing's happening to them today.
On Twitter, on Facebook, other radio shows, same type of thing.
You sound angry.
Can't you be happy?
Can't we be happy?
There's a theme, it's a pro nothing they do is real.
And all I'm doing here is exposing the left.
I deconstruct them better than anybody else does, and that's why this guy called to try to discredit my effectiveness in exposing who the left is and this this demand for you.
Obama just now.
This the White House press secretaries out there, the arrogance of these people.
Sorry, the arrogance of the arrogance, you know what Ernest said?
He said Obama, he Obama was reassured by Trump's tone in his election nights.
He was re Yeah, like Obama's god and is worried how the children are behaving.
And Trump was a little bit like an angry little bully in a sandbox until election night, then Obama was reassured.
Well, I don't, you're not the arbiter, as far as we're concerned, of what's assured and what's not reassured.
This this presumptive arrogance, this conceit.
It's just one of the it's one of the many uh characteristics of the people on the left.
Just they rub me the wrong way.
In fact, they make me itch.
I'm scratching myself and I laugh.
Here's uh here's Axelrod.
And it was Jeff Lord uh on the CNN last night.
This is during Anderson Cooper 99.
One of the things that I remember from uh 2009 that kind of stunned me was two things.
One was Rush Limbaugh saying uh when Obama took office, I am rooting for him to fail.
Can I say I want him to fail?
And the second, frankly, were people like Donald Trump who challenged the president's right to be there, challenged his citizenship.
I don't raise that to be provocative.
I raise it because many people I believe what you believe, which is we have one president at a time.
We all have to hope for success.
It's the success of the country.
But there are a lot of people who say, well, gee, they didn't give Barack Obama that chance.
Right.
They know what I meant.
Axelrod knows full well, Obama know.
They all know what I meant.
I wanted him to fail implementing his agenda.
So should we all have wanted that?
Especially looking back in hindsight.
I should be credited and lauded for guts and courage today instead of being reamed over the calls for it.
Because I was right.
President Obama succeeding as a president, in my view, would have been the same thing as great damage being done to the country, and it has been.
Anyway, here's Jeff Lord.
He tried it's a feudal effort because they know they're misrepresenting what I said.
They know exactly what I meant, but Jeff Lord tried to straighten it out in the case.
I want to answer for Rush here.
When he said that, what he was saying was that he believed Senator Obama, President elect Obama was going to move the country towards the socialist left, and he hoped he failed in that attempt.
He's frequently said since that he didn't fail in the attempt.
He didn't want him to fail in the sense that I think this is being used.
He was totally misunderstood.
So he meant in a nice way.
No, no, what no, what it what he meant is, look, as a conservative, he didn't want the country, the president to take the country to the far left.
They know.
They know they're using it, and that's why, folks, you may think I'm off my rocker, but I'm not.
They coordinate everything.
And Hillary and Obama being magnanimous, and then Axelrod going out there on the CNN last night pointing that it's it's a way for them to try to set themselves as a step of better people, finer, nicer people.
Uh and all when they don't mean it.
You watch.
Obama, I by the way, I'm starting to see other people steal this from me.
I'm seeing other people now on Fox talk about this.
I heard it twice today.
Obama's gonna stay in Washington, and he's gonna stay in Washington because if the next president tries to unravel his agenda, Obama's gonna go to the media and try to stop it.
I've only been pointing it up for two years, but the point is that is gonna happen.
And then let's hear about unity then.
Obama doesn't mean any of this, and neither did Hillary.
She is livid that she lost.
You do not know how livid.
It was an entitlement to her.
And stop and think.
You know, the drive-by media for all the unfairness that they we think that they dish out to us.
Imagine yourself, a true blue democrat believing Nate Silver, believing all these people, believing the media, all the pulse.
Can you imagine how betrayed you've got to feel today?
They had Democrat voters thinking this was going to be one of the biggest landslide wins ever.
They had people thinking this was a slam dunk.
This is really didn't even need to go through the election except as a formality.
You talk about being misled and angry as a result, you can't convince me they are not still fit to be tied.
And this magnanimity is the public face that decorum says you wear.
But it is a mask, and do not doubt me.
Have a soundbite that I want you to hear here.
I want you to listen to here some Gloria Borger at CNN.
And it's about the Trump Obama meeting in the Oval Orifice.
The Oval Office meeting is a pro forma thing.
It's a tradition that after the election the president-elect shows up and is greeted by the sitting president, and nothing really happens at these things.
I mean, it's maybe very even little instruction on what goes where and where various rooms are and it's just it's just a pro forma thing to illustrate the uh transition of power, being peaceful and all that.
And then they go out and they take photos, the the current first family and the incoming first family.
Wall Street Journal had a report that Obama had canceled that photo op.
That's the first bit of news.
Actually, the first bit of news we had was the meeting did not last 15 minutes.
This one lasted 90.
So what normally is a 15-minute meet and greet, hi, how are you?
Uh enjoy your time here because I'm coming.
See you later, turned into a 90-minute meeting.
Then we learned that Obama had canceled a photo op with him and Michelle and Trump and Melania.
We didn't know why.
Then they let the cameras in there, and uh from for all the shutters being hit with all the cameras, it was tough to hear.
Uh, but but Trump said that he was very appreciative of Obama for his counsel and for his advice, and that they would be continuing to work together on things.
Yeah, yeah, that's right.
And um, then Josh Ernest, the press secretary, went to the press room, and he's still there answering questions about it, and he said the president was really, really relieved uh and reassured uh by President elect Trump's tone uh on election night, uh calling for unity and magnanimity and getting along and kissy face and stuff.
And then Ernest said, we at the White House are all rooting for Trump's success in leading and uniting country.
We're we're rooting for Trump's success in leading and uniting the country.
Now, under what circumstances, no, wait a minute, before you say that that's not true, before you say, before you react to it's not true, you must ask yourself a question.
Under what circumstances would it be true?
If the White House is serious, and if Obama means it, when Josh Ernest says we're rooting for Trump's success in leading and uniting the country.
Is Obama not admitting that it isn't united?
And that he's the president.
So what for that to be true?
What has to happen?
What had to have happened?
What must happen?
For that to be true.
For the for the for the White House to say our goal is to make sure Trump can hit the ground running.
What would make that true?
I'm just asking, because I'm in a great mood today.
I'm not going to answer it.
Now let's with that bit of background.
Let's now go to Gloria Borger, who is going to tell.
No, I'm not going to answer that question.
I'm in a good mood.
I'm going to laugh today.
I'm going to smile.
I would have been giddy.
We're going to be happy.
I don't need to answer it.
That's the beauty of the way I do things.
I have given you the answer without actually answering it.
Under what circumstances would it be true?
Under what circumstances the White House mean it when they say, we want to make sure Trump can hit the ground running.
Our goal make sure that Trump can hit the ground running and unify the country.
Under what circumstances would that be?
We can't believe they would say that.
We can't believe they really want that to happen.
That would mean that Obama hopes Trump does a better job than he does.
Or has done.
We don't think Obama's thinking that, so under what circumstances would they support Trump?
Under what circumstances would Obama hope that Trump succeeds.
Now we go looking at crestfallen faces in there.
As I remain giddy.
Now, here's Gloria Borger, CNN newsroom mere moments ago, who claims to know what was said in the meeting.
Wolf Blitzer.
Said, Gloria, I'm anxious to hear your thoughts about this meeting and what we heard.
This conversation may have been a lot more substantive than just a meet and greet.
I think President Obama had a few things he needed to say.
And to tell Donald Trump about what he has achieved and what Trump needs to keep in mind as he talks about undoing every single thing that he has done over the past eight years.
I think this was the president's moment to say to Donald Trump, I know where you're coming from, but let me just tell you a few things.
And I think that it's kind of stunning for these two people to meet face to face for the first time after they have been hurling insults at each other.
Why is it stunning?
This is what tradition says that you do.
Let me offer this here.
Blitzer says, Gloria, I'm actually your thoughts.
And she said the conversation may have been.
Well, let me offer my thoughts on what might have happened.
Can I?
May I?
The smile on my face?
Can I tell you what I think might have happened in this 90-minute meeting that's supposed to go 15?
It might have begun cordially.
And Obama might have started off in his arrogant, conceited way of telling Trump how things work and how things are, and might have even said, I really uh appreciated the way you grew that night, made your tone a little bit more dull.
At which time Donald Trump might have, in his own way, unloaded on Barack Obama for the hurl of insults that night at the White House correspondence dinner.
And Trump may have schooled Obama on how dangerous it is to start accusing people of being supported by the Ku Klux Klan.
And Trump may have schooled Obama on how these past eight years have wrecked this country and how damn difficult the job's gonna be to put it back together, and don't you dare try to get in my way as I try to fix it.
I'm thinking something like that might have happened in the 90-minute meeting.
Gloria Borger thinks that Trump walked in there like a puppy dog, and that Obama, the brilliant academician and faculty lounge chairman, schooled Donald Trump on the basics of civility and humanity.
And I'm thinking Trump went in there and told Barack Obama, essentially, you have run the risk of really making me mad, you have gone way out of the way.
You have been beneath the pail.
You have gone low, you have ridden dirty, and I am not the kind of guy that puts up with it and smiles and looks the other way just for the pro forma formality of this all.
And if you try to stop me in any time in the next four years, you're going to regret it.
With a little Trump, of course, smiling the whole time because he's giddy and happy and can't just wipe the ecstatic nature out of his mind.
He's very happy.
And then after that, they have the meeting.
So obviously something would have had.
Now look, we're going to bring the photographers in here.
They're going to come in here, and we're going to make look like we got along, and we're going to make look like everything's fine.
We're going to make look like this tradition happens just this way every year, and nothing happened here, Mr. President.
Got that?
It's gonna be fine.
You can lead the meeting and you can tell everybody that it's just as fine and dandy as you want, but don't forget what I told you when we leave here.
Why couldn't it just as easily be that Gloria Borger has her thoughts, I have mine.
I and I'm not paid by the Democrat National Committee, and I don't call them to run by thoughts by them.
I don't call anybody.
Hey, it's okay if I say this, hey, what really went on in there?
Hey, would it be okay if I said that Obama really schooled Trump?
Yeah, yeah, uh, fine, go for it.
We'll cover you.
That doesn't happen here, folks.
Okay.
And now, my friends, uh brief time out, and we're gonna come back and we're gonna get to your phone call.
God, I love going to your phone calls.
It just makes me so ecstatic, and I can't wait.
It's next.
Back to the phones we go, and it's Orange Texas next.
This is Dean.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Hi.
I'm I'm calling.
Um I'm a retired police officer.
I'm a Trump supporter.
I am very happy about the outcome of the election.
Having said that, you have every right and obligation to remain vigilant and the freedom to be as angry as you want to be when you see things that make you angry.
And this notion of unity that you have been talking about today is the heart of what I'm calling about.
And it's not the left.
I I I agree with you about all of the things that you said about the left, but it angers me so much more when I hear it from the right.
I won't name the show or the people.
It's a show I watch every day.
It's a it's a right-meaning show with people that are intelligent, whose opinions I respect.
But for the last two days, they have been making a push in the interest of unity for Donald Trump specifically, not President Obama, but President Trump to pardon Hillary and all her cohorts for everything they've done from the beginning of the world to date.
A specific quote is this would be a magnanimous gesture.
I am so sick of hearing this.
We did not elect.
I voted for Trump, I support Trump, and we did not send him there to ignore corruption.
And I'm not trying to be uh angry, you know, I don't want retribution or revenge or anything.
I just want justice and the truth to come out, and that won't happen if they're pardoned.
I can't do anything about what the current president pardons or does.
But this notion from the right that we have to cow to unify is insane.
It won't be respected.
It's never been respected.
They are not going to brace him.
I don't care if Donald Trump pardoned everybody and gave college funds to their grandkids.
They are not going to put their arms around him.
He needs to do what he said he was going to do and do the right thing and get the truth out to the American people.
I wholeheartedly endorse that.
On the pardon of Hillary Clinton, uh look, you might have some people on our side thinking about Gerald Ford pardoning Nixon and how people were upset about that, but they Ford said it did it, he did it to get this issue behind us wasn't a distraction anymore, and Watergate was already a divisive enough thing.
Uh but this isn't about Hillary Clinton.
Well, I know.
That's what I was gonna say.
This talk for unity goes way beyond pardoning her.
This talk for unity goes what what these people are actually advocating is that we give away our win.
That's what irritates me about it.
They're acting they their attitude is that victory means good manners and victory means you don't act like you won, and you don't lord it all over people, and and And you you show them we really don't like you.
We really do like it's not that we don't like you.
We really do want to get along.
In other words, too many people on our side are literally content to be the Washington Generals.
You are absolutely correct, and you said it earlier.
You said that we have a victory.
In addition to being a retired police officer, I'm also a veteran.
And I can tell you, militarily, if you win a victory, if you win a battle, there is nothing the enemy can do to take that away from you.
The only way you lose it is if you give it away.
Once you've won, they don't have anything left to do.
The only way we can lose this is if we give it away.
Well, the reason why this matters to me is because I know the enemy.
And I use the enemy, of course, in the political context.
We know the opposition.
The Democrat Party is our enemy.
We certainly are theirs.
That's clearly how they view us.
They don't want to get along with us.
They don't want to unify.
But we we have a unique opportunity.
First time in my lifetime, the Democrat Party is as weak as it's ever been.
We really do have we have scored a major, major Donald Trump has a tremendous strongest party since the twenties.
It's it's overwhelming.
The opportunity here to straighten out things in this country.
It's not about getting even with people, it's about straightening out the direction of the country and getting it back to the principles with which it was founded under freedom and liberty and all of the things that you and I hold dear.
And it's the greatest opportunity that we have ever had to do so.
And this talk about unity is nothing more than a giant obstacle put in the way.
I'll tell you when you unify.
And I I used this example earlier, and I'm sure a lot of people shrieked.
When you unify is when they surrender.
How?
When the Japanese surrendered, signed the surrender papers on the deck of the battleship Missouri.
We dictated the terms.
They surrendered.
They haven't had a military sense.
We dictated the terms, and and we've been unified with Japan ever since.
Correct.
But we are never going to get there if we don't have people on our side that think we're the good guys.
If people on our side think it's somehow not productive to think of ourselves as right and them wrong, if it's somehow not helpful to think of us as being on the right side of history and them on the wrong side, if if if that prevails, then we're going to squander the victory.
Now, all of this is said independent of Trump.
I have no idea what Trump's going to do when he thinks about any of this, but I guarantee you he's going to have all kinds of people working on him to moderate his tone, to tone it down to uh be more cooperative with the Democrats, under the belief that that's what the American people want.
They want us working together.
They want to see comedy and unity and everybody who Kumbayang getting along.
That'd be great if it's ever happened.
It hadn't happened.
Happens in time of war for a couple of days, but after that it's over, as the Democrats proved after 9-11.
So no, you and I, you and I are on the same page here.
It's just a it's a tremendous opportunity, and the Democrats have never been weaker.
And it's the American people that have made it happen.
The American voter is who has rendered the Democrat Party into its current state.
The American voter has made it plain what he and she want.
They do not want Democrat Party rule anymore.
They don't want Democrat policies prevailing.
They don't want it.
Elections have consequences.
They mean things.
There was a huge, huge turnout for Donald Trump, and it was specific.
Trump was doing sometimes five rallies a day.
And people were often critical that he got sidetracked and started talking about personal things.
But he had substance in every one of those rallies.
He had a series of issues that he addressed.
And my point is there is no way that people can say Trump's election doesn't have a mandate.
It does.
And the idea that there are people that want to squander it on our side, fall prey to this unity.
When all of and what what's the pressure being brought to unify?
Protests, angry college students, distraught people needing therapy.
Oh my God, it's really tears and people.
these protests are bought and paid for, and we know this.
Trump knows it himself.
The rallies that featured violence, his rallies, were the result of Democrats in the Hillary campaign hiring the protesters, wearing t-shirts that were made for them to go out and made to look like Trump supporters going nuts.
And that's who's on the streets of Philadelphia.
One night it's Black Lives Matter, the next night it's Occupy Wall Street, the next night it's some other group.
It's all the same people.
It's all the same money, and it has the same purpose.
The Democrat Party purpose today is to make sure that this Trump victory never gets implemented.
Every ounce of energy that Democrats are expending today and tomorrow, the day after, is to make sure that there is no definitive evidence or meaning to Donald Trump's win.
Back in just a second.
I predicted that the media would try to distort my comments, in which I reacted to Van Jones on election night CNN, the resident communist claiming that the election of Trump was a white lash.
So we have those sound bites coming up.
▲
Export Selection