All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 4, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:33
November 4, 2016, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, let me tell you one thing before I forget this.
I told you that Mel Gibson made me a copy of Hacksaw Ridge with with screeners.
And I watched it, and it's awesome.
I'm not a movie reviewer, so acting performances and all that.
Everybody's in it is really a good, good, good movie.
And one of the first scenes in the hero of the movie opens in his childhood.
And he and his brother are running around where they live in the Blue Ridge Mountains and they're climbing trees and they're climbing mountains.
They're climbing little hills, and their parents are nowhere nearby.
And as I'm watching this, I just know that there are going to be parents watching this thinking, how dare they let their kids run around like that?
We would never let our kids run around in treason on rocks like that.
Happens to me.
You why and that sense, this movie, because it's a it's a World War II movie about Okinawa, but it does a great job.
I don't know whether it intends to or not.
I'm just telling you my the way I watched it, it does a great job of demonstrating how much less wussy our culture was than it is today.
Because I guarantee you, this opening scene, but these two young brothers, like eight or nine, ten years old.
They're nowhere near home and they're climbing trees and up steep mountains, and they're scaling 25, 30 foot cliffs and this kind of thing.
The kind of thing that parents would be put in jail for today if a liberal found out it was happening.
Anyhow, great to have you back, L Rushbow and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network open line Friday.
Call about whatever you want to talk about.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's Open Line Friday!
As you get through, you can say whatever you want.
It doesn't have to be something I'm interested in, as it does Monday through Thursday.
Speaking of all that, look at this headline here.
Oh, the Direct TV out.
I guess I should dress this.
It's now LA.
Uh some people are reporting to me that only the Fox News channel is out, that they're able to watch CNN.
That's I haven't experienced that.
In every place I've heard about it or where we have it, both channels are down.
You can watch anything else on DirecTV, but Fox News and CNN are down.
I didn't check MSNBC, so and I could, but I'm not going to go to the trouble because I wouldn't watch it even if I could.
So what you have you mean they're back?
Oh, they're back.
Oh, well, we'll try and see if we're back here.
We haven't checked.
It's uh we'll do that during the break.
Uh but I just got a note for the break that they'd lost Los Angeles.
I got a friend of Los Angeles that it's uh that it's out.
We're checking it down here in the Southern Command, even as we speak.
But I don't know.
Do you think hack?
Sound like this was a hack.
You think the Russians did it?
The Russians.
The Russians did it.
Uh it is curious that it's just CNN and Fox, is it not?
What's your football question?
Yeah.
Tony.
They will stick with Dak Prescott of the Dallas Cowboys.
Uh Snerdley is a cowboy fan, and he's heard that Romo's back practicing.
I don't think Romo's ready to be activated yet, but the people that report on Romo say he's out there has lost a lot of weight.
He's moving around great, throwing bullets, making it look like he's ready to come back.
Don't forget these players have their own PR agencies, too.
Well, sure, they players hire PR people.
Agents and all that handle that for them.
Uh but I think I think I saw a story that uh uh was quoting Stephen Jones, executive vice president son of Jerry Jones, and he said something to the effect.
Hey, Tony knows.
Tony Romo, he knows that we gotta keep doing what's best for the team.
So the Cowboys have their own PR people too.
There's no reason to sit Dak Prescott down.
This this far into things.
I don't see it.
I could be wrong, but I don't think it's gonna happen.
Um Harvard.
Harvard cancels men's soccer season over sexually explicit scouting reports.
Harvard University announced yesterday that it would forego the remainder of its men's soccer season after the Scruals lawyer found several scouting reports, quote unquote, prepared by team members that assessed members of the women's team based on their physical appearance.
The Ivy League School newspaper, the Harvard Crimson reported last week that members of the 2012 team created a document rating each of that year's women's soccer recruits on a numerical scale and assigning them a sexual position.
No, you mean like they're a 10 or they were a nine or they are an eight?
You mean like Trump does.
Oh no, you mean boys are boys even at Harvard?
Does this mean men are men even at Harvard?
They haven't been able to scrub that out of them so far.
So they're going to cancel the soccer season.
You know what's amazing about this story?
I'm telling you the truth.
These kids, students, the hard, they've they've grown up, don't doubt me on this.
They have grown up being taught not to act like boys.
Do not doubt me on this, folks.
Do not try to be funny.
I'm not trying to get your attention by saying something outrageous.
It is something that is part of our culture.
Boys have been raised to believe that in their natural state, they're unacceptable.
They are predators, they are potential rapists, they are rough, insensitive, selfish, all of these things as defined by women.
And so the chickification of the education system, and there's no other word for it, all it means is that women now dominate positions of power in education, have done their best to redefine masculinity.
There's even, well, I've had a couple stories in the past couple of weeks about that very thing about how colleges are actually attacking the notion of masculinity as though it is a negative trait.
Look, folks, if you are new to the program, if you're just tuning in because it's election time and you want to see what's going on, do not doubt me on this.
I know this sounds funny, cliche, and I know how sensitive people have been made in our culture today.
It's safer to conform.
It's safer to go along.
Don't make waves.
But I'm telling you.
This makes perfect sense.
They have they have spent this at least a generation trying to convince and teach boys not to act like boys.
That's why I made reference to the opening scene in Hacksaw Ridge.
Nobody will think a thing of it except I would.
See, I've been trained to spot the politics and everything because the left politicizes everything.
And I'm just telling you, you watch, go see this movie with some friends.
I guarantee you in these opening scenes, you're gonna have some people say, Man, do you believe what they used to let kids do?
We would no more let our kids do this.
And yet what you'll see portrayed in this movie is the way you used to grow up in this country.
We are trying to take masculinity away from men.
They have spent their lifetime in schools trying to pound into young boys' brains that being a man is a bad thing, or potentially, if you don't get a handle on it, if you don't get control of it.
And even what's amazing is despite these efforts, you know what this is like back in the early days of the modern era of feminism.
Some of you may be too young to remember, late 60s, early 70s, uh, What they tried, enlightened parents raised their little girl babies with G.I. Joes and their rooms were painted blue,
and they were not given any toys like doll houses or Barbies or any of that, because the belief was that girls grew up to be way they were because they were conditioned by sexist patriarchal societies who made little girls want to be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.
So Barbie dolls here and there, little tea house playhouses and kitchen sets and so forth.
So what these parents did, they gave all that girl stuff to the little boys, and they gave the G.I. Joe dolls and all that to the little girls.
You know what happened?
The girls started looking for different outfits to put on G.I. Joe, and the little boys started using Barbie dolls as missiles, throwing them around.
In other words, nature is nature.
Feminism came along and was attempting to basically redefine basic human nature because for some reason they don't like it.
So for the past number of years, there have been efforts to strip masculinity and manhood out of the young male population, and they failed.
They've obviously failed.
If the men's soccer team at Harvard has come up with a secret numbering system to rate the female soccer team recruits on a scale of what, one to ten.
Now stop it, look at the way Harvard's dealing with it.
Canceling the Socracy.
This is considered to be such a great cultural and societal offense.
If you listen to Hillary on the trail, one of the things, one of her mantras is when she talks about Trump.
And Donald Trump, I am getting sick and tired of Donald Trump basing women on their appearance.
I'm tired.
I'm sick and tired of Donald Trump rating women on their appearance.
I watched this.
And I asked myself, who's odd?
Hillary, do you really think that that stopped happening some time ago?
You think really men stopped raiding women based on the way they look?
The reason why you women ought not worry about that is that every woman is gorgeous to somebody.
You can see it.
Every woman is attractive to somebody.
What are you smirking at me for?
I've looked don't make me prove this.
Don't make me say what's necessary to prove this.
Use your brain.
Every woman is attractive to somebody.
Because tastes are different.
People's own self-esteem is different.
Every woman, every guy is attractive to somebody.
It works both ways.
But the Democrats, the Hillaries of the world, want to come, they want to try to take this aspect of human nature and drum it out of everybody.
So now Donald Trump is unqualified to be president because he notices pretty women and women in his mind are not so pretty.
We can't have that.
Well, what?
We're supposed to see all women the same.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way.
It just doesn't work that way.
And the other way around with women.
Some we guys have been trying to figure this out for as long as we've been alive.
Why certain women like the absolute worst examples of our friends, cohorts or what have you.
But you know for you know what I'm talking about.
Uh it just it people hook up, they get together.
Everybody eventually does.
There are exceptions, of course, not everybody, nothing is ever total 100%.
But the abnormal, the unnatural way of looking at this is Hillary Clinton's way.
Most men look at women and see them on a scale.
You can't help it.
It's in the genes.
It's built in.
We are designed this way.
It's, you know what?
It's rooted in this mysterious thing called life, which does everything it can To perpetuate itself.
Life is an amazing thing.
It will do whatever it can to perpetuate itself to avoid going extinct.
And it's built into virtually every living thing.
And it's something that you scientifically cannot capture or quantify.
And therefore a lot of people reject it because you can't scientifically quantify it qualitative or get a consensus on it.
But every time I hear Hillary Clinton says, so what's wrong with that?
Everybody else does too.
And women do it.
Women judge men the same way, maybe not a number scale, but they've got their own ways of doing it.
It's just as natural as it's going to be.
I'm tired of Donald Trump who judges women based on how they.
I'll tell you what, Donald Trump's hired more women in positions of authority and power and paid them a lot more than Hillary Clinton ever has or ever will.
You can make book on it.
Donald Trump has hired more women than Hillary ever will, and he pays them more than she ever will.
And they are of different types and appearance and looks.
They run the spectrum.
This is my one of my main gripes about liberalism is that it is essentially given everything else it is, it is an assault on basic human nature that they are trying to erase and wipe out.
And this trying to erase masculinity and trying to take manhood out of little boys.
This is a classic, what they're doing at Harvard here.
Okay.
So the male soccer team is keeping their eyes on the new female soccer team recruits.
And they've got a secret little system for rating them.
It has to be secret because the leftists at the school disapprove of this kind of behavior.
So they've got their secret little list, and it's been discovered.
And the people at Harvard who want every student to be an automaton, who want everybody thinking the same way, doing the same things, acting the same way, are now going to shut down the soccer season as punishment.
But on the bright side, you can look at it and say they've tried to strip masculinity and traditional manly characteristics out of young boys, and it's obvious at Harvard they have failed big time.
Okay, latest election news.
If you're just joining us, CNN in their polling projections has made four moves on what they call their road to 270 map.
They have a map of states, electoral votes based on their polling data.
They had projected Hillary at two, what was it?
68.
No, no.
No, no, that's what she is now.
They projected her at well, the story doesn't say.
She was, I think up at 290.
Some polls they've had her at 300 electoral votes.
CNN's had to make an adjustment.
They now have her at 268 electoral votes based on their polling and uh an amalgamation of others.
270 is what you need.
Hillary is losing ground.
New York Times has her tide, plus three.
That's the margin of error, dead heat with Trump and the New York Times.
State battleground polls are tightening too.
But I'm telling you, you got to be careful, folks, because in you can you can look in certain places today and you can see the exact story, opposite story.
You can see Hillary just kicking but you can see stories that the FBI story, the investigation, the foundation has dwindled away that it's nothing and only Fox News is talking about it, that Hillary is soaring in the polls.
You can find that today, too.
But it isn't true.
The race is tightening.
Here is Bob in Grand Rapids, Michigan, as we get started on the phones on open line Friday.
Hi, Bob.
Yeah, hi, Rush.
Hey, uh I'm here in Michigan, and while I know that yard signs are anecdotal and subjective.
Um compared to 2012, when there was no Romney signs here in Michigan.
Uh I I even asked my wife, I said, does Romney even like offer signs?
Because there was Obama signs everywhere in 2012.
But this year, especially in the last week or so, I'm telling you, it is it is 31 Trump signs, and they popped up like mushrooms.
I mean, they are absolutely everywhere.
You know, I I I hear this from people all over the country.
The yard sign is a stra it's a it's a it's a thing people look at and assign a lot of weight to.
I get emails from people constantly telling me how many yard signs I'll tell you where I'm really getting them is Philadelphia uh Pennsylvania.
People in Pennsylvania are telling me they've never seen yard signs for any Republican like this.
I don't know what to make of this because I don't know how much of it's legit, folks.
I'm not trying to to to uh uh de-emphasize it.
Uh what surprises me about Michigan, we keep hearing that that Hillary has this amazing get out the vote operation, GO TV, that she spent money on it, that she's got this organization that just unparalleled.
And by the same token, Trump's got nothing.
Trump hasn't put any money in the get out to vote operation he's relying on.
Free national media covering his rallies, Republican National Committee, they haven't really spent a lot of money and time helping Trump in this area.
Well, okay, but if Hillary has this massive get out the vote operation, I'm telling you, yard signs are part of what they do.
Yard signs are what get out the vote operations do in part.
They don't just wait till election day and start making phone calls.
They they work the phone banks even beforehand, but they create the illusion with all the money.
They make these signs and they don't wait for people to come ask for them.
They drive around town and put them up.
And if there aren't any Hillary signs in places, it makes me curious.
The saga continues.
Adios.
Thank you.
Now into our 29th year, ladies and gentlemen, as the most listened to radio talk show in America.
An audience size that dwarfs.
Even the leading programs on cable.
800-282-2882.
I have a quick question.
Back to Harvard.
Canceling the men's soccer season because they discovered that the men on the soccer team actually had a secret way of rating new recruits on the Harvard women's soccer team.
Yes.
The male soccer team members were rating the newly arrived female team members on a one to ten scale of attractiveness.
Well, now there have to be some gay members of that soccer team, right?
What would Harvard do if they learned that gay men's soccer team members were rating newly arrived recruits who were gay and the men's soccer team.
You know that happens.
You know it happens.
Just like it does with men and women.
What would Harvard do if they found out that gay men were rating other newly arrived gay men on the attractiveness scale?
Well, nothing, Mr. Limbo, because that has nothing to do with Matthew Limited.
Don't give me that.
Do not, I don't want to go there.
Don't tell me because it does.
Hey, it's just a think piece question.
I'm just asking it.
I like to ask questions to blow up people's logic.
Here is Melissa in Woodbridge, Virginia.
Great to have you.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Um I have a question for you.
I'm wondering if you Hey, by the way, did you hear that Trump is on the verge of grabbing Hillary's Virginia vote?
I hope not.
I don't think so.
Just kidding.
I think it zoomed by you.
I'm sorry, what was that you called about?
I didn't mean to attract.
I'm wondering if you think that there is a silent group of women who are going to vote for Trump because they feel more comfortable with the man at the helm.
Well, you would be better to answer that than I would be.
No.
Well, but you could you Yes, you've even you've conceived the question, the fact that you've conceived this question means that you are wondering If there are women scattered around America who actually like strong, decisive, confident men and are afraid to say so to certain people like pollsters because of what reaction.
Who are ready and able and willing to vote for Trump and whether they'll surprise people by doing so.
You've been wondering that question, obviously, right?
I have.
Mm-hmm.
Well, uh you are a woman.
What do you think?
The fact that you've conceived the question means you think it's possible.
I think it is possible.
I think that there um are a lot of people out there who are being shamed into thinking that they should be voting for Hillary because she's a woman.
Oh, yeah.
In fact, you know how they're doing it?
Let me tell you something Melissa, what I heard yesterday, I had the soundbite, I didn't get to it.
Don't need it today.
I've got a Ron Brownstein of CNN analyzed that this election is really coming down to voters who went to college and voters who didn't.
And the voters who went to college are obviously all in for Trump, uh Hillary, and the people that didn't go to col i.e.
uneducated are going all in for Trump.
That's how Ronald Brownstein at CNN analyzed it yesterday.
So within that how discriminatory do you think that is?
I have two graduate degrees, and I'm not voting for Hillary.
Yeah, exactly.
What are your degrees in, by the way?
Um I have an MBA and a master's of science and organizational leadership.
Holy smokes.
That's impressive.
You have an MBA.
Where is it from?
Columbia Southern University.
Congratulations.
Thank you.
That is not easy.
An MBA, folks, mass that that that's that's dramatically difficult to achieve.
And so you're all in for Trump.
So I think that's bogus, too.
I think that that is the elitist way.
That's how these people that can't understand Trump supporters tell themselves what it is.
Oh, yeah, it's idiots.
It's uneducated people, the rubes of our society.
That's who supports Trump.
That's that's uh essentially prejudicial and biased, discriminatory and everything else.
Uh but ask your question.
Are there a lot of women who are going to defy the attempt at shaming them into voting for Hillary and pop up and support Trump?
I don't know.
But that's one of the things that I would love to see in the exit polling data after the election.
I I would love for so much of this conventional wisdom to be stood upside down and on its head after this election is over.
Uh I just I would really, really love seeing that.
But whether it exists.
I mean, that's like asking, are there people, both sexes, are there people who haven't voted in a long time because they don't think their vote matters and because they think it's insignificant that the powers that be are going to do what they're going to do no matter what, that the whole political and governmental system is arranged by the people who run it, so they just don't vote.
They don't participate.
And I know that one of the fears on the Hillary side is that there's a the whole slew of those people who are going to vote this time for Trump that finally somebody's come along that actually represents them.
And they think their vote may matter this time.
I happen to know the Hillary campaign is very worried that it's a sizable number of people.
Now they they've been trying to poll it, but you can't, because if those people, some of them are registered, some of them are not registered, the ones who are not registered, it may be tough to find them.
So this is one of the fears that they have.
This is one of the many reasons I think it's very difficult to predict this because it's such a different election when one of the candidates doesn't have any political experience or resume at all.
It just I think makes it really, really tough to call.
And it'd be the same way trying to answer your question.
I I no way of knowing until it happens.
But your common sense would tell you that yes, it is going to happen because the mainstream media is wrong about a whole lot of things.
Why wouldn't they be wrong about this too?
How many women do you know that that would that fit the category that you've just described who are going to vote Trump?
I think there's a lot out there.
I'm not going to name names, but uh, oh no, I wouldn't want you to name it and men, too.
Men who are being shamed into thinking that they have to be progressive and they have to vote for this first female president.
And you know, there's a silent group of those as well.
What kind of shaming is that?
I must tell you, I do not know.
I'm not claiming to know a heck of a lot of people or even a cross section.
I don't know a single guy voting for Hillary.
I don't know a single guy who's been shamed into voting.
Now, I may know somebody voting for Hillary that I don't know is doing so, but I don't think so.
I don't know a single guy voting for Hillary, and I don't know one of them that's been pressured to or shamed into it.
Now that's new to me.
Who what kind of guy gets shamed into voting Hillary because she's the first female?
I think ones who um don't do their homework and who don't pay attention.
Yeah.
All right.
Well, look, Melissa, interesting questions out there.
I'm sure there are men like that.
I'm just telling you, I don't know any.
Um, but obviously they're there, they're all kinds out there.
I mean, there were people that voted for Obama simply because he was the first African American, but there was substance for that.
I mean a lot of people that would not have voted for Obama, Obama, but who did, because they really hoped that the nation making the statement, electing an African American president, would prove once and for all that this is not a racist nation.
I believe that there were all kinds of people who voted for Obama with that hope.
That was the reason.
Everything else was irrelevant to him.
Whether he's a liberal, whether he wasn't liberal, whatever he's going to do with health care tax, it didn't matter.
They're just so sick and tired of the racial divide that they can think of no better statement than a black man be elected president, because if that happens, you can't possibly have a racist country.
I think that was the thinking.
And yeah, well, the Northeast Metrosexual guys, you're calling you're talking about Vanity Fair, GQ and these guys that are that a little, you know, go both ways anyway.
And and yeah, I know there's a lot of the Northeast metrosexual crowd that'll go for Hillary, because she doesn't threaten them like other kind of women threaten them.
Uh it's like women don't uh women are not threatened by gay guys.
And they love hanging around them.
They have no fear whatsoever.
And gay guys have all kinds of knowledge about fashion, lipstick and that kind of stuff.
So they it it's made to order, but and it's it works in in reverse with the metrosexuals you're talking about supporting Hillary.
But I I don't know how many how many people do you think are devoted or voting for Hillary for this historical reason, first female president, like they did first black president.
How much of that's going?
I don't think very much at all.
And I'll tell you something else about the people that voted for Obama thinking they're gonna end racism.
I wish they would have listened to me.
As I told them it's gonna get worse.
It is not going to make anything better racially.
Racial relations are only gonna worsen.
It was easy to predict.
It didn't take a brain at all.
It didn't take any extra work, it didn't take any extra thinking, it was axiomatic.
If the first African American is going to be from the civil rights movement and a died-in-the-wolf liberal, it's only going to make racial relations worse.
Now, if you're new to the program, hearing this for the first time, you might be, how's that?
Well, I've just asked you to look back in the last eight years.
Was any criticism of Obama permitted?
It was not.
We can't criticize the president of the United States.
Why?
Because he's African American, and any criticism is said to be racist.
And so everybody.
There we have more racists in America today than we've ever had by definition of criticizing the president.
It was it was one of the reasons they wanted to elect an African American was to insulate him from any criticism.
It It's easy to charge the accusers, the critics, with racism.
It shuts them down.
Look at the Republicans in Congress.
They made no serious effort to stop Obama or disagree with him.
They got scared to death of being called racist.
Take a look at Ferguson, take Buffalo, I'm sorry, Baltimore, take a look at any city in this country, Chicago, Detroit.
You tell me where racial relations have improved instead of worsened.
It's the exact opposite of what people hoped would happen.
Mr. Limbaugh, you think that because Obama, the African American government.
No, no, no, good question.
I'm not saying strictly because he's African.
This is what liberalism does, folks.
Liberalism isn't interested in solving these problems, or they make you think they are.
They make you think that they are devoted to compassionate solutions.
Not at all.
They thrive on this chaos.
Chaos allows them to set themselves up as the solution to whatever problem is causing the chaos.
And you'll note problems never get fixed.
When they're in charge, do they?
Back in a sec, folks.
North Carolina is a bellwether state now.
Discussed this yesterday.
You know, it wasn't that long ago, folks, in the campaign, maybe a month ago, Hillary Clinton was down in Ohio, and you remember the experts in the media, and in the Hillary campaign, where else, well, you know, Ohio is not a bellwether state anymore.
It doesn't matter.
Ohio doesn't carry nearly the way it's too many white people now living in Ohio.
It's not a good cross section.
When Hillary wasn't leading Ohio.
And she started inching back in Ohio, and then all of a sudden Ohio started mattering again in the media.
It's just amazing the way they do this.
North Carolina has now become a state that is almost as big a battleground as Florida or North Carolina.
And that's why Obama and Hillary and Trump are going to be spending an inordinate amount of time there between now and Election Day.
North Carolina is also treating us to conflicting polling data, which I think is as conflicting as any we are getting.
Depending on which polls you look at, Trump is plus five to plus seven.
In other polls, Hillary is plus three or plus four.
The Hillary-oriented polls tell you that early voting is going so much in her favor that it's going to be a landslide.
The African American vote and the early vote in North Carolina is just going through the roof for Hillary.
But then you find elsewhere in other reporting you would think legitimate that says just the opposite.
And so the upshot is that nobody knows really what's going on in North Carolina.
It depends on what you want to believe.
So I have done my best to come up with what I think is the definitive best as of this moment in North Carolina.
Right now, everybody's calling North Carolina a tie, a toss-up.
Here are the early voting totals so far on day 15 since early voting began.
And remember, Romney won North Carolina 2012, but just barely, just barely squeaked by.
Registered Democrats are one-tenth of one percent behind their numbers from the same day in 2012, four years ago.
0.1 percent behind.
The Democrats are 0.1 percent behind their numbers four years ago.
Registered Republicans are 12.5% ahead of their turnout numbers in North Carolina, early voting same day, 2012.
Registered unaffiliate voters, unaffiliated, precious independents and so forth.
43% ahead of their same day totals from four years ago.
Numbers are hard to follow, let me repeat.
Day 15, early voting North Carolina Democrats, one-tenth of 1% behind their numbers from four years ago, same day.
Registered Republicans 12.5% ahead of where they were four years ago, and unaffiliated independents 43% ahead.
So of the independents, the unaffiliated, how they go, who knows.
Why aren't they registered either way?
We don't know.
Black vote, North Carolina, early vote down 10% from where it was at this time in 2012.
Same day, total numbers with a deficit of over 60,000 ballots compared to 2012.
So the Democrats all told her 60,000 ballots lower, if you count the black vote in with that, than they were four years ago.
In early voting, that does not say toss-up to me.
It says Democrat trouble.
And that's why Obama is in North Carolina twice today.
And he's out there saying things like, Donald Trump, right at home, KKK.
Donald Trump loves the KK.
It's disgusting, but that's what they've got to say.
That's it.
That's it.
I don't know.
I think you're at the bottom of the barrel when you have to say your opponent's going to be right at home of the KKK.
But the problem is there really are a bunch of lame brained, dangerous Democrat voters that believe that stuff.
That's why it's disgusting.
Irresponsible.
▲
Export Selection