All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 1, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
November 1, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
So what's going on out there, folks?
What is your take on what's going on?
What I actually know is you want to know what my take is on what's going on.
And of course, I'm here to tell you.
I will tell you what I think is going on.
What's going on is over the top.
A lot of it on the surface doesn't make any sense.
A lot of it seems incomprehensible, and that's why I'm here to make the complex understandable.
It's great to have you with us.
Here's the phone number if you want to be on the program.
800-282-2882, the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
We've got some interesting polling data to.
I'm sorry, EIBNet.us.
That's correct.
We've changed the email domain, and it's L Rushbo at EIBNet.us.
Sorry for that.
Thank you for the reminder.
We've got some polling data here and some interesting aspects of it that I want to tell you about.
There are two long form pieces that I want to call your attention to today.
Victor Davis Hanson back with a brilliant piece about the Clintons and who they are and what motivates them.
And it did it's at National Review Online, and I just love it because it it essentially in his own words makes points that I have been trying to make about the Clinton since I first became aware of them in uh 1990.
There's another piece, and this also is a piece right after my heart.
It's by somebody named Thomas Frank.
Now there are two Thomas Franks.
And one of the Thomas Franks is a big lib who wrote about what happened to Kansas, meaning why are people voting against their self-interest by voting against liberals and so forth.
This is a Thomas Frank writing for the UK Guardian.
The headline of this piece, forget the FBI Cash, the Podesta emails show how America is run.
I have uh noted on several occasions what's at stake here, the establishment, who they are, why they will do anything to hold on to power.
And this piece nails it.
And the brilliant aspects of this piece is that you can learn it.
You don't have to tell anybody what you think.
It's all there in the Podesta emails, the WikiLeaks document dump.
It's all there.
How these people in the establishment are devoted to the preservation of their own power and their own place within the establishment, that ideology comes a close second that what they're really focused on is power.
And anybody that has power, they will sidle up to.
And it explains the unification of people from Hollywood from Silicon Valley from Wall Street to big finance to corporate America to multinational corporate world and how it relates to the Democrat Party and the media and so forth.
It's everything that I've told you.
It's everything I've theorized to you about who these people are and why they're members of the establishment, what's beneficial and how you can't get in, how it's closely guarded.
But the the great thing about this piece is that he documents it and proves it by virtue of what the various members of the establishment are writing to each other in the Podest email.
There's so much more that has been reported, for example.
There are emails to Podesta from other powerful people begging him to get their kids a job, uh begging him to get their daughter a job or their wife a job, or get them a job, or get them a free flight on some sorty billionaire's jet somewhere.
And it all happens.
And none of it is merit-based.
It's all based on membership in this club, which again has nothing to do with merit, has a little bit to do with ideology.
It has more to do with your resume.
You know, where you went to school, where you work, who your parents were, legacy things like this.
But it is so well done.
I'm stunned it runs in The Guardian.
The Guardian's a left-wing paper in the UK, and this piece just indicts the establishment.
It explains why.
Trump is winning.
It explains why.
It doesn't specifically say so, but if you read it, you'll understand why Trump has got so much support, why so many people are so fed up, because the last thing this group cares about is the country.
They don't care about what's good for the country.
That falls by the wayside in in um in the wake of considerations of what's good for them.
Now, none of this is a surprise in terms of you know that there are people like this, but this documents it and it's extensive, and it's primarily Democrat.
The Republican members are there as pets, so to speak, but they don't rank.
But it's it's it's all about Republicans who want to be, who want to be in this club, who want to be taken seriously, who want to be accepted.
It's classic high school, except the people we're talking about are multi-billionaires.
So I can't, I'm not going to take the time to read the whole thing.
I may give you excerpts, but I'm pointing you to it.
We'll link to it at rushlimbaugh.com.
Forget the FBI cash, the pedesta emails, show how America is run.
And boy, is that right.
And it has nothing to do, literally has nothing to do with the will of the people, has nothing to do with what you learned in Civics 101 and junior high school.
It has nothing to do with what you think the country was founded to be.
That's not at all how America is run, nor who runs it.
Depending on who you are and how much you think about these things, it will confirm suspicions that you've had.
And it's it's just it's great.
It's just it's it's stunning.
And then the Victor Davis Hansen piece uh is just over the top in its brilliance at defining the Clintons for us and for everybody.
It's nothing that you don't know again.
Well, some of it might be, but what it is is just it is so well crafted, and it it's just dead on right.
Let me give you just an excerpt paragraph from Victor Davis Hanson here.
Of course, the Clintons are not only corrupt, but they are cynical as well.
They accept that the progressive media, the foundations, the universities, the bureaucracies, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, honor power more than trendy left-wing politics.
The Clintons well understand that their fans will, for them, make the necessary adjustments to contextualize Clinton criminality or Clinton immorality or Clinton amorality.
Sexual predations, the demonization of women, graft, and unequal protection under the law, are also of no consequence to the inbred, conflicted and morally challenged media who will always check in with the Clinton team like errant dogs who scratch the back door of their master after a periodic runaway wanting to leave be let back in.
It just dissects everything that is the Clintons.
Clinton Inc., Clinton Friends, how the Clintons manage to become paupers, go from paupers to multi, multi, multi-millionaires without producing anything, without generating anything.
It's a story of Clinton grift, Clinton graft, Clinton corruption.
It's everything that you know.
So well crafted as to be undeniable.
So those are two long form pieces I want to call your attention to.
We've got the polling data.
Now let's look at at some of the actual news that has been made since we were last together.
By the way, Trump and Pence are in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, and they are doing a joint appearance today, and they're really focusing on Obamacare.
They are really staying focused on issues while all this other stuff that they have no control over, such as the Comey investigation, the FBI investigation, whatever's going on with Hillary and Huma and Carlos Danger, uh, they're letting that play out, which reminds me.
The audio soundbite's coming up.
The Democrats, I mentioned yesterday that if you didn't know, you should know that they're in panic in the in the deep dark crevices of power.
The Democrat Party there in abject panic.
This is not where they were supposed to be.
Trump was not supposed to be a factor.
The election was supposed to be over months Ago.
But certainly this week, it was not supposed to be in question.
Hillary should have been, they're already planning inaugural balls and all the other trappings that go with victory.
This is not where they wanted to be.
And with the possibility Trump could win, they are in abject panic, and it's being demonstrated on TV.
James Carville lost it on MSNBC.
We're going to break the ban that we have on MSNBC to let you hear that.
Robbie Mook, the Clinton campaign, lost it.
They're all losing it out there over Comey.
Now, stop and think the Clintons themselves are responsible for sustaining this has nothing to do with Comey.
Like there's a story in the Hill.com about how Comey is going to be soon under investigation for the letter that he sent to Congress because he's violated the law.
That's not how it works, folks.
I hate to tell you, but it's the subject or the target of an investigation that is the focus of the investigation.
In this case, Mrs. Clinton and Huma, the investigator is not under suspicion.
But this is how the Clintons operate.
They turned it around on Ken Star, made him the focus with the media's assistance, and they're trying to do the same thing now with one week out.
They're trying to do the same with Comey.
The problem is, back in July, they praised Comey to the hilt.
You know what Hillary should have done the minute Comey came out last Friday, when this letter was made public.
Comey's letter to Congress.
You know what she should have done?
She could have shut all this down.
She could have owned this week, because they're not going to be producing anything.
Well, that's another thing.
I gave you a hypothetical question yesterday that may turn out to have actually some truth behind it.
But if Mrs. Clinton on Friday, or if the Clinton campaign, if MOOC or whoever had said, we trust James Comey, he's already investigated this.
And there isn't anything there.
We've got one week out.
We're going to continue our quest here to win the presidency.
We have in complete, utter confidence and faith in James Comey.
I don't know what he's got, but he's already said that there's nothing there, and that's what we think is the case now, and that would have shut it down.
But with her fighting it, and with her team trying to make Comey now into Satan incarnate, and with all these, you know, hiding Huma, they have invited scrutiny.
They have made it look like, oh my God, Comey must have something, or Hillary wouldn't be acting this way.
There must be something there, or the Clinton campaign wouldn't be reacting this way.
So all of this they are bringing on themselves.
All of this they have brought on themselves.
None of this, I'm watching these left-wing commentators and they're all complaining about Comey and the FBI and the missing the boat.
If she hadn't set up this server, if she hadn't said what difference does it make after four people died in Benghazi, if she hadn't been so cavalier, if she hadn't thought that laws don't apply to her, if she had not believed that she was above the law and traditions that everyday people have to follow, she wouldn't be in this mess.
She's in this mess because of what she did.
She is in this mess because of who she and her husband are.
She's in this mess because there is evidence that they have been running a grifting operation and a graft operation at their foundation.
There is evidence that she has not been completely truthful on whatever is with this email and server.
And now that Huma Abedin and her husband are involved in this, you find it fascinating as I do that here you have a woman who portrays herself as a staunch feminist.
And she represents staunch feminists.
She represents the new era of feminists, being brought down by a sex pervert, married to her number one aide, Huma Abdon.
What about the irony of that?
And then you have Huma marrying the guy in the first place, and then now Huma's.
I I don't know how my emails ended up on my husband's.
It's just too rich.
Hillary's the most cheated on woman in America, and it's happening again right in front of our eyes.
This time it's Anthony Wiener.
And his own activities, and because of his marriage.
Oh, Hillary is calling Huma, not one of my staffers.
Yes, one of my staffers laptops is in the investigation under question of the FBI.
One of my staff, one of my staffers.
Huma Abedin is Hillary's body companion, meaning Huma is everywhere Hillary is.
Huma carries out Hillary's orders and directives.
Huma advises Hillary.
Huma and Hillary are inseparable.
She's not just one of Hillary's staffers.
That's another indication here that there's something really going on.
There may be something to see here.
And I just, for people that are so expert in dealing with things, they have really mishandled this.
Now let's take a look at some of the headlines that have and and news summaries that happened when we were last together, since we were last together.
The New York Times has come out with a piece last night that says definitively there is no Donald Trump link to Russia.
Now, they put it on page 21 so that New York Times readers and the Upper West Side won't see it and have their days ruined, but they still run it.
You know, Zabar's is not going to be damaged here by deranged New York Times readers because they won't see this.
It's on page 21.
However, they ran it, and it's all over their website, and it's all over the country now.
The New York Times came out with a piece last night, there is no Donald Trump link to Russia.
Now what's going on with that?
That that is a major, major cutting them off at the knees for the Clinton campaign and Obama, who have been living off this notion that Trump knows Putin, that Trump's a friend of Putin, Trump and Putin are behind the email dump that WikiLeaks has.
The New York Times says there's no Trump link.
Then we had Doug Schoen saying he can't vote for Hillary anymore.
He's been around her ever since she's been in public life, and he's withstood every scandal.
But this one, he wants no part of, and he announced publicly on Fox he's abandoning Hillary.
CNN dumps Donna Brazil.
After they learn that Donna Brazil's been sharing debate questions with Hillary Clinton.
And the sidebar to that is, isn't it amazing how many people in the Hillary camp think she's incapable of simply answering issue-oriented questions on the fly?
They have to cheat.
They have to furnish her the questions.
They have to let her get a leg up and maybe an advantage in preparation because they just don't trust that she's up to speed enough, issue by issue, to handle a question.
I mean, who can't anticipate the questions, but they have to go out of their way.
And here Donna Brazil has what whatever she did for Hillary Clinton has resulted in her being canned at CNN.
That takes a lot.
Then Obama came out via Josh Earnest and said, we totally trust Comey.
We don't think Comey has done anything here to interfere with an election.
We think Comey and the FBI are behaving here with utmost integrity.
Whoa!
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
What does this mean?
If you read a little further, you might also sense a warning from Obama to Comey, but I have to take a break on that aspect.
I'll complete all this and we get back.
I actually had a couple people email me last night, Rush, because they came across everything I just shared with you.
And it looked to them like, with a question, Rush is a Democrat Party turning on Hillary.
Have they decided it's not worth it that they can't prop her up?
I mean, that's how this stuff appeared to people last night.
Let me review again.
New York Times.
No Trump linked to Russia.
New York Times backs Trump, in fact, on Russia.
Doug Schoen can't support Hillary.
I've seen everything, and this takes a cake.
I'm no longer in Hillary camp, can't do it.
You know, that's a major defection.
Uh CNN getting rid of Donna Brazil.
Major, major unprecedented type things happening on the Democrat side.
Obama holding with Comey.
President Obama does not believe FBI director James Comey is attempting to influence a presidential vote, according to Josh Ernest, the press secretary yesterday.
He said the president doesn't believe that he's secretly strategizing to benefit one candidate or a political party.
Comey's in a tough spot, Ernest said, and he's the one, this is where the potential warning might be.
Comey's in a tough spot.
He's the one who'll be in a position to defend his actions in the face of significant criticism from a variety of legal experts, including people who served in senior Department of Justice positions in administrations led by president and both parties.
They always throw that in.
But despite that, hang on.
Okay, so before I was shrewdly interrupted, White House, we will not defend nor criticize Comey on emails.
So if you add all of these things up, just one more time.
The New York Times last night comes out with a piece, no linkage, Donald Trump to Russia, undercutting a major campaign thrust point of Hillary Clinton.
Doug Schoen, longtime Clinton Polster, announces he can't support Hillary.
He leaves.
CNN dumps down to Brazil after they learn she was sharing debate questions with Hillary Clinton.
The undertow there is that Hillary obviously does not have the confidence of her people to go into a debate without having a leg up, without having been able to cheat.
They don't trust her to be able to answer questions to which she doesn't know what that they're coming.
It's astounding.
And then Obama announces via Ernest, nothing wrong with Comey.
We totally support Comey, we don't condemn Comey.
And again, here's the whole paragraph.
President Obama does not believe FBI Director James Comey is attempting to influence this year's presidential vote.
Now wait, it wasn't that long ago, just a couple days, that the White House was not doing this.
The White House was joining the Clinton campaign and casting aspersions on Comey.
And then all of a sudden there's a 180.
And it made people think, you know what?
Maybe Obama sees a handwriting on the wall.
Maybe she's toast that Obama's now is going to throw her overboard because what Obama cares about, first and foremost, is his legacy in the history books, not the Democrat Party, not Hillary Clinton, not even his agenda as it relates to this in terms of continuing it.
I actually had people thinking this, sending me emails that could this possibly be going on.
Now here's the whole paragraph, though.
From Josh Ernest.
The president does not believe that Comey is secretly strategizing to benefit one candidate or another or political party.
That that's cutting the Democrat Party off at its knees with one of their main claims that Comey has become a pure partisan.
Now they don't have credibility saying this because they've praised Comey back in July.
But then Ernest said of Comey, he's in a tough spot.
He's the one who will be in a position to defend his actions in the face of significant criticism from a variety of legal experts, including people who served in senior Department of Justice positions in administrations led by presidents in both parties.
The White House, that you could construe that as a warning from Ernest, well, Obama threw Ernest to Comey.
The White House had no role in Comey's decision to inform Congress that he was investigating new emails related to Hillary's private server.
Ernest added this, said he would neither defend nor criticize the decision Obama wouldn't, amid the outcry about Comey's decision.
And then Ernest said that Comey is a man of integrity and good character.
Well, that undercuts every line of attack.
The Democrat, the Hillary campaign decided to mount against Comey.
There's one more element to this.
Now, yesterday on this program, I asked the hypothetical.
I think it was of a caller, but I asked the question to everybody.
What are you going to do?
What's your reaction going to be if Wednesday or Thursday of this week the FBI announces the investigation has proceeded significantly enough that they now know there's nothing there.
There's no additional information to be added to what we already know about Mrs. Clinton and her emails in her server.
I said, What's your reaction to that going to be?
And people admitted, oh, that would be horrible, Rush.
That would be terrible.
That would have meant that mean we've been playing.
That's exactly right, because while all this five days has gone on, nobody's talking about WikiLeaks.
Well, did you see what the LA Times reported late last night?
FBI investigators had planned to conduct new email review over several weeks.
FBI now hopes to complete a preliminary assessment in coming days.
But agency officials have not decided how or whether they will disclose results publicly.
Developing.
So in addition to all this other stuff, the Times saying nothing to see there, Trump and Russia.
Doug Schoen leaving Hillary CNN dumping Brazil, Obama siding with Comey praising his integrity.
The New York Times backing Trump on Russia, the LA Times saying investigators of the FBI may have some news for us on Thursday.
Could come this week.
So while we, let's throw that into the mix.
FBI says they might have something on Thursday.
White House singing Comey's praises amidst a potential rushed preliminary assessment of 650,000 emails.
You realize how you could be you would you couldn't be blamed if you thought some BS was in the air here.
So the point is, nobody knows.
Again, I hate to keep repeating my mantra.
But boy, there are things happening that we did not expect to happen in any way, shape, manner, or form.
Whoever thought that Obama would side with Comey, whoever thought CNN would ever get rid of somebody like Donna Brazil, and for the admitted reason that she helped Hillary cheat in a debate.
And let's not forget that the Obamacare premium increases are out there, and that has dramatic impact on people.
Now, the people in the establishment, the people in Washington, the Obamacare premiums are of no concern to them.
Immigration, no concern to the impact of these things on average ordinary Americans, no concern to them because it doesn't affect them.
Obamacare premiums of no concern to people in the establishment.
Same thing with illegal immigration.
Same thing with trade deals.
But you have to throw all of those things in the mix.
And folks, on the surface, to me, this is looking really bad for Hillary Clinton.
This is not the kind of thing, these are not the kind of things that happen to a winning vibrant, upbeaten positive campaign one week out from an election.
Nowhere near it.
Now let's go to the audio sound bite.
Here's Robbie Mook on uh CNN's new day this morning, Chris Cuomo is talking to him.
He says, okay, so what do you do?
By all accounts, the FBI not gonna say anything between now and election day.
Do you leave it alone?
Because, as you accurately point out, we don't know what the heck's in these emails, or do you keep banging on Comey's door and saying, tell us more about these emails?
Or do you keep banging the door and say, Trump?
Tell us more about Trump.
Look into what Trump's doing.
What are you doing, Mook?
If you're in the business of releasing information about investigations on presidential candidates, release everything you have on Donald Trump.
Release uh the information on his connections to the Russians.
Maybe there are investigations now into his taxes.
It was shocking to me yesterday that every time people ask questions about investigations pertaining to Donald Trump, they are tight lipped and silent.
Quote unquote sticking with protocol.
When it comes to Hillary Clinton, they don't.
We didn't cause this problem.
James Comey opened this door, and we're just asking for him to make this right and treat everybody the same.
So you hear that.
No, they we need to investigate Trump.
We need to investigate Trump on Russia.
We need to investigate Trump on Texas.
We need Trump's investigations to continue.
And we need the FBI to tell us what's going on.
This sounds childish.
This sounds like first grade sandbox kind of stuff.
It sounds like Bart Simpson.
I didn't do it.
Nobody's only doing you can't prove anything.
It's like a little kid here.
Well, I think you should go into Trump, too.
You know, you he has no defense for Hillary.
He's got literally no defense for whatever they are investigating Hillary Clinton.
The only thing he can do is demand the FBI look into Trump, too.
Maybe he hadn't known that the New York Times has already cleared Trump when it comes to Russia.
And when the as far as liberals are concerned, and Democrats are concerned, when the New York Times clears you, you are cleared.
The New York Times carries as much weight as the FBI.
And if the New York Times says there's nothing to see between Trump and Russia and Putin, then there's nothing to see.
Doesn't matter what the FBI says.
The New York Times is that big a Bible for people on the left.
Here's Alex Wagner over on CBS this morning.
She's a senior editor at the Atlantic, used to be at PMSNBC.
Gail King says, Are you hearing whisperings of concern about her presidency even in her own party?
Yeah, I mean, I think what happened last week, we were treated to another batch of WikiLeaks stolen emails from John Podesta's account, which reflect a serious amount of consternation inside her own campaign about how she handled the email scandal when it first broke.
If we are still seeing the words Vince Foster, if we are still saying the words Whitewater, if we are still talking about Kenneth Starr, who's in the New York Times today, Democrats are forced to say the words Anthony Wiener ten days, nine days before an election is not where the party thought it was going to be.
I think that's the same Alex Wagner that worked at MSNBC.
Maybe there's two of them, and maybe the Alex Wagner, I'm thinking, still works out.
I don't know.
Doesn't matter.
The fact is they're panicked.
Now I've taken brief time out here.
When we come back, James Carville erupts on MSNBC.
Don't go away.
Yes, we're going to get your phone calls in on the program today, as always.
We got a great roster of people waiting to get through now.
But we want to get to Carville.
This is uh yesterday afternoon MSNBC live with Thomas Roberts.
And it's pretty volatile.
And it just it's it's it's in the vein of panic and anger.
And I don't care however you choose to analyze what's going on.
The thing that you have to know is this is not where the establishment thought they would be one week away from the election, nowhere close.
There is panic, not just in the Democrat Party, folks.
There's panic at the upper levels of what we now call the ruling class or the establishment or the elites.
And I may I may even change my mind and share with you a couple of three excerpts from this Thomas Frank piece about the Podesta emails demonstrating how our country's actually really run and who is running it.
And it's got a soft spot in my heart because it's pretty much everything that I have attempted to inform people of in terms of just who the ruling class is.
So that's coming up.
We have a ban on MSNBC.
We do not play audio sound bites that involve their talent because they're lame brains, and you know, why promote them?
But occasionally they have a guest that goes off one thing, one way or another.
Carville did.
Thomas Roberts says a Democrats criticized director Comey, but if he sat on information until after the election, there's something there, wouldn't he be accused of a cover-up?
He was acting in concert and coordination with the House Republicans.
End of story.
He gave letter to him, they gave it to Fox News.
Also, we have the extraordinary case of the KGB being involved in this race and selectively leaking things from the Clinton campaign that they hacked.
American democracy is really under attack here.
James Comey was praised in July by everyone for not moving forward with a recommendation to Loretta Lynch.
So why now is it different for Comey when they find something that could be pertinent?
You know what John Maynard King said?
When the facts change, I changed our mind.
What do you do?
Well, you said something nice in July, so you can't say, in spite of Justin Spoken policy, in spite of formal people in the Bush administration, in spite of ethics people all over saying this is unprecedented.
Why are you defending this?
Comey sent his letter to Republicans and Democrats.
Carville says that Comey was acting in concert and coordination with the House Republicans.
He gave the letter to them.
He gave it to both parties.
And then they gave it to Fox News.
So what?
Fox News is a news agency.
We also got it.
I had it that afternoon.
Everybody had it.
And now we have the extraordinary case of the KGB being involved in this race.
Carvel has lost it.
Carvel has become a left-wing conspiracy loon, believing whoever on the Democrat Party started this insanity that the KGB or the Russians are responsible for exploiting the Clinton server and then leak the information to Assange, who then put it on his servers at WikiLeaks, and he's actually trying to sell that.
That's not what happened.
The Russians don't have anything to do with this, folks.
But the Democrats, that's all they've got is to blame it on the Russians.
And if the Russians didn't do it, and they're just out there saying it as a political point, this is dangerous.
Accusing a wannabe potential, again, superpower of meddling when they're not.
The point is they can't get over this.
It has to be something totally complicated and inexplicable to explain how they allowed such a monumental screw up to happen.
The monumental screw up is not jettising the Clintons long ago.
When you're in business with the Clintons, this is what happens to you.
And so now their only recours is to put the KGB.
That's Putin.
You know, Putin was KGB, so Carvel's uh he's trying to be colorful here rather than say the Russians trying to say the KGB.
American democracy is really under attack here.
No, there are people trying to save it, James.
That's what this election is really all about, Mr. Carville.
There are people working their butts off trying to save our republic and save democracy from the likes of powerful people in the Democrat Party who want to take this country and turn it in to a personal little playground for their own private gain and to hell with what happens to anybody else that lives here.
And people are fed up with it.
So Thomas Roberts says, well, James, in July, when Comey did the unprecedented act of holding a press conference to reveal that he wasn't going to charge.
He wasn't going to recommend Loretta Lynch, charge Hillary or anybody else.
The left, nobody on the left was up in arms that Comey was acting in ways he shouldn't act.
They praised Comey back then.
Aren't you guilty of a double standard here?
No, it's not a double standard at all.
You're sitting here defending an assault on American democracy.
This is an unprecedented event that was done at the behest of the House Republicans that was leaked to the press by the House Republicans.
And as we know, the KGB is all over this election, and this is what we're talking about.
This is unbelievable eight days before an election, and it's more unbelievable that people like you are defending this.
Right, and there's still more, folks.
One more bite, here we go.
In no way am I defending it.
I'm just trying to ask questions.
Well, of course you are, you make an excuse.
No, you're making excuses for Comey by bringing up something somebody said in July.
No, I'm not making excuses to Mr. Comey's been praised on the left and the right for being a pretty neutral guy for his career.
I don't know what someone said in July.
We're talking about the FBI against Justice Department of Policy against everything that we all know, getting involved in a presidential election.
If you want to defend that, you defend it, but I'm not.
I think this is an outrage, and I think the fact that the KGB is involved in this election is an outrage, and I think the American people ought to take their democracy back regardless of what the press wants to do, and the excuses they want to make for Comey.
And if there's not something substantial, and I mean really substantial, then this is in effect an attempt to hijack an election.
The House Republicans in the KGB are trying to affect our democracy.
Kid Star, Kid Star, and alien civility trying to get your kids smoking Joe Campbell and dirty cigarettes, Larry.
That's what they're trying to do.
This is James Carvel, my friend.
James Carvel.
The KGB.
Taking back our democracy.
The KGB threatening our democracy, ruining our democracy.
The KGB interceding in an election.
No.
Justice doesn't, when doing properly, justice doesn't see a calendar, Mr. Carvel.
We'll be back in just a second.
Don't go away.
Right here it is in the New York Times.
U.S. officials doubt that Donald Trump has a direct link to the KGB.
Well, it says Russia.
But I'm substituting KGB for Russians what Carvel's doing.
Right there it is in the New York Times.
Obama doesn't believe FBI director trying to influence election.
ABC News.
Your phone calls, I want to get to them soon in the next hour.
We'll do that right when we get back here, folks.
▲
Export Selection