Rush Limbaugh Program - October 13, 2016, Thursday, Hour #3

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 13, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

33:46

October 13, 2016, Thursday, Hour #3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Somebody help me remember something.
	What was the name of the TV show back in the 50s?
	Produced out of New York, The Game Show, where they discovered cheating.
	Was that $64,000 question?
	Some of you people may have heard about that in a movie that was made about it.
	There was a Columbia University professor.
	I mean, and the guy looked like one.
	His uh his last name was Van Doran.
	I think it was Charles Van Doren.
	And he was a guest on the $64,000 NBC show, pretty sure.
	And they had some schlub from Queens on, who was the uh guest.
	And it turns out that Mr. Van Doren was provided the answers to the questions in a game show, $64,000.
	They found it out through a long and arduous process.
	It was enough of a story that they made a two-hour movie out of it.
	Back then, when you provided a contestant or a participant with the answers, careers were ruined, reputations were ruined, jobs were lost, and nobody involved got promoted to the White House.
	But here we have in the Clinton WikiLeaks email dump, we've got clear evidence of Donna Brazil passing on questions that are going to be asked of Mrs. Clinton in a debate with Bernie Sanders.
	She's a DNC chair.
	Well, she wasn't, and she was uh she's always a high-ranking DNC operative.
	She was she was working at CNN as a as an analyst or commentator, what have you.
	Now she's denying it.
	I I never saw the questions.
	I I never passed them on.
	Um but people have the the WikiLeaks email has the question in it, and people check the question that was asked, and they're almost verbatim.
	And the Clintons and everybody that works for them are denying everything in the well, they're not.
	That's it, they're not denying, they're just blaming the Russians for the hack.
	And they're claiming that this is outrageous.
	These are stolen emails, and the Russians did it, and the Russians are trying to influence the outcome of an American election.
	This is a despicable thing, and they're doing it to try to help Trump.
	The Russians, meanwhile, are not happy being accused of this kind of thing.
	And the KGB is an honorable organization.
	They will gladly take credit for whatever it is they disrupt, but they don't like being falsely accused of stuff.
	And Putin.
	Well, in the in the sense in the sense, yeah, they're honorable in the sense that you know who they are, they know who they are, and you know what's gonna happen to you if you're on a foul of them.
	I mean, they they make no pretense, but they're not hiding there is the Red Cross, you know, doing what they do.
	They're not they're not, they're not not to say they're not scary.
	I mean, it's the Committee on State Securities, but KGB is and by the way, nobody ever leaves the KGB.
	Once you become KGB, and the KGB didn't go away, they just changed the initials to the CRP or some sort of thing.
	And Putin is KGB.
	Uh Vitalikirkin, all these guys that were routinely guests on ABC News, Nightline and so forth, uh, Vladimir Poser, these are all KGB types.
	I mean, they went to school to learn the facets.
	Anyway, greetings and welcome back, my friends.
	Uh L. Rushbow and the fastest three hours in media.
	I had Cookie roll off some sound bites from the Trump appearance that just ended about 10 minutes ago.
	So that means he kept this one under an hour.
	A crowd was wired.
	This is the story he told when we had to go to break at about 22 minutes after the hour.
	This is the story about the people magazine writer.
	Let me make sure.
	Yep, people magazine story.
	This is set it up.
	Twelve years ago, People magazine asked to do a profile of Trump and Milani on their one-year wedding anniversary.
	And they agreed to do it.
	And so Trump is describing the story and everything about it, and I had not heard this when I heard him tell the story, so I wanted you to hear it because we had covered it up in one of our breaks.
	The story was beautiful.
	It was beautiful.
	It was lovely.
	But last night we hear that after 12 years, this took place 12 years ago, this story.
	A new claim that I made inappropriate advances during the interview to this writer.
	And I asked very simple question.
	Why wasn't it part of the story that appeared 12 years ago?
	Why wasn't it part of the story?
	Why didn't they make it part of the story?
	I was one of the biggest stars on television with The Apprentice, and it would have been one of the biggest stories of the year.
	Think of it.
	She's doing a story on Melania who's pregnant at the time.
	And Donald Trump, our one-year anniversary.
	And she said I made inappropriate advances.
	And then he described the setting that it took place.
	The area was a public area, people all over the place.
	But it is amazing.
	Doing a story, a love story on how great we are together.
	And by the way, we're stronger today than we were ever were before, which is but it's a love story.
	It's a love story on our one year.
	Right.
	And if I did that, she would have added that, it would have been the headline.
	And who would have done that if you're doing this and you're one of the top shows on television?
	These people are horrible people.
	They're horrible, horrible liars.
	All right, well, let's just take this and let's put it under the lights of examination.
	So there's Trump and the Milanian in a public setting, and the interview is taking place for the Puff Peace story on Trump and Milani, their one-year anniversary, 12 years ago, and the reporter at doesn't say anything for 12 years.
	Last night says, Oh, yeah, Trump made a move on me when I was writing that story.
	Trump made inappropriate advances during the interview.
	Not in a pre-interview.
	During the interview when there were people around.
	Is that can you see that happening and the reporter not writing about it?
	Can you see that whole scenario?
	So you got the people magazine, babe writing the story.
	Trump makes inappropriate advances during the interview, and it doesn't end up part of the story.
	And Melania would have been there to see all of it take place, as there would have been a lot of people around to see it take place.
	So here's the wrap-up bite from Trump on all.
	The corrupt political establishment is a machine.
	It has no soul.
	I knew these false attacks would come.
	I knew this day would arrive.
	It's only a question of when.
	And I knew the American people would rise above it and vote for the future they deserve.
	The only thing that can stop this corrupt machine is you.
	The only force strong enough to save our country is us.
	So he went on to say that he's not going to spend a whole lot of time in the future answering all these various Allegations that are made.
	He's going to try to stay focused on the issues.
	By the way, if you're just joining us, I need to ask or explain why I asked a question.
	One of the one of the women that the New York Times says Trump octopused her on a plane.
	They were in a first plant first-class cab on the airplane, and Trump behaved like an octopus.
	So I've just created here a new adjective, octopuster.
	She said what happened was that after dinner, Trump raised the armrest in first class.
	They raised the armrest, and that's when he made the octopus moves.
	So as a person who hasn't flown first class, in gosh, I I don't know.
	I fly coach or business.
	Seriously, I I don't recall any first class seat having the what would the armrest that you could move.
	That you could like you can in coach.
	You know, you can the armrest are gonna get it out of the way if you don't have anybody sitting next to you, you can raise it and have a little bit more room in the seat.
	So I've had flight attendants that are emailing me here in droves saying they've never seen it, that that first-class seats do not have dividers that you can raise.
	Now, this took place 30 years ago.
	So it couldn't have been on a super G constell.
	No, they weren't flying a super G constellation.
	No, no, they would have had it been a Boeing 727 or newer for to be 30 years ago.
	The only reason I bring it up is because the woman claims that that it's an integral part of the story is that Trump raised the armrest and then made the octopus move.
	Well, I don't know whether flight attendants are looking on or not.
	But remember, Trump was not a big star, then, in terms of the apprentice was not on, and People magazine wasn't calling, and they weren't doing it or any interviews.
	So what you're going to see now, in fact, I think we already are, the networks are going to convene numerous roundtables of journalists to discuss Trump's allegation that they are horrible.
	They love talking about themselves.
	And that the Clintons are a criminal enterprise.
	Are you aware of any Republican ever characterizing the Clintons that way?
	I'm not either.
	That kind of stood out as well.
	I mentioned also that there's there's positive Trump news out there today, if you look for it.
	Rasmussen reports says that Trump has taken the lead.
	The full results from Sunday Night's Debater Inn.
	Donald Trump has come from behind to take the lead over Hillary Clinton.
	The latest Rasmussen reports, White House Watch National, Telephone and Online Survey.
	And by the way, this is not a flash poll.
	This is a scientific online and phone poll, just like SurveyMonkeyz is.
	And it shows Trump with a 43% level of support and Hillary at 41.
	Yesterday, same poll, Clinton held a four-point lead, 43-39, which was down from five-point lead on Tuesday and her biggest lead ever of seven points on Monday.
	Monday's survey was the first following the release of an 11-year-old video of Trump at Access Hollywood with Billy Bush.
	All three nights of the latest survey follow Sunday's debate.
	So here are two polls, SurveyMonkey NBC and Rasmussen, that show Trump either tied or in the lead.
	They are given no credence.
	They are considered by the drive-bys to be outliers and kind of freakish, cookish.
	Rasmussen, come on, that's a Fox News simpatico poll, any way they say.
	And, of course, the New York Times still, the L.A. Times still has this nip and tuck.
	And now the New York Times has a story.
	Some in the Republican Party who deserted Trump over the release of the lewd tape from Access Hollywood are now returning to Trump and support.
	The story starts out this way.
	Oh, buddy Jonathan Martin, formerly of uh politico, stung by a fierce backlash from Donald Trump's ardent supporters, four Republican members of Congress, who had made headlines for demanding that Trump leave the presidential race, retreated quietly this week, conceding that they would still probably vote for the man they had excoriated just days before.
	From Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the only member of the Republican leadership in Eater Chamber who had disavowed Trump to Representative Scott Garrett of New Jersey.
	Lawmakers contorted themselves over Trump.
	Some of them would not mention him by name, preferring instead to affirm their support for the generic Republican ticket, still grasping for some middle ground.
	By the way, speaking of this, what I see what I see.
	Oh, Boehner.
	Boehner was on uh uh on the record last night with Brit Hume.
	Do you hear what he said?
	You didn't hear what he said.
	He's voting for Trump.
	You know why he's gonna vote for Trump?
	Supreme Court.
	He said, Supreme Court.
	Supreme Court is everything.
	Supreme Court is the future of America as we know it or not.
	John Boehner said he's voting for Trump.
	He didn't say he was happily voting for Trump.
	He didn't say he was endorsing Trump.
	He just said he was going to vote for Trump.
	Because of the Supreme Court.
	In other news that you would have to consider good for Trump, this is from uh KDKA Pittsburgh, CBS Channel 2.
	Nearly 100,000 Pennsylvania Democrats have switched to Republicans since the beginning of the year.
	And what's more, the Pennsylvania Republican Party says more than 240,000 new voters have joined the party since last November.
	Pennsylvania.
	So the the the news that you would consider upbeat or positive for Trump is there.
	There's not a whole lot of it, but it is there if you can ferret it out and uh and dig it up.
	The top ten Clinton scandals exposed by WikiLeaks.
	When we get back, plus more of your phone calls.
	Okay, I need to throw something out to you all because I do not routinely have six-year-olds running around in my house.
	But I'm watching Angela Rye just now on CNN.
	She's the former executive director of the Congressional Black Caucasians, which is a very, very political organization.
	Congressional Black Caucasians.
	And she just said, this election isn't about right versus left.
	It's about right versus wrong.
	And then she said, my six-year-old hates Donald Trump.
	And Brooke, we don't talk politics in my house.
	We right.
	The executive director of the Congressional Black Caucasians doesn't talk politics in her house.
	So on his own, her six-year-old, and she she made it made the point.
	My six-year-old Brooke, even my six-year-old knows what a horrible person Donald Trump is.
	I've never said my son on his own six years old, looks at Donald Trump and just hates him.
	So now she says our country is in a debate over right versus wrong.
	And Michelle Obama's out there today saying she almost started crying too when she started recounting it.
	She doesn't know guys that talk this way.
	She's just it's so unacceptable.
	It's so foreign.
	She grew up in Chicago.
	She grew up in Chicago.
	She went to Reverend Wright's church.
	Bill, he was riding dirty.
	She must not have been in church that day.
	But look, I just my instincts tell me that a six-year-old could clearly hate somebody his parents hate.
	But this parent said they don't talk about politics in her house.
	Either in front of the kid or ever.
	So the kid, the six-year-old on his own, is somehow finding Donald Trump on TV when the parents don't talk about politics.
	Finding Trump on TV and then instantly hates him.
	So I would have to defer to those of you who uh either have or have had six-year-olds.
	I can't I can remember when I was six.
	When I was six, I was petrified of turning seven because of the first grade and having to use paste.
	I forget what it was, but I was.
	But I can't remember if I hated anybody then.
	I don't know that I've hated anybody ever.
	It all seems strange to me.
	Well, that's the point.
	A kid can pick up anything and reflect it.
	I don't I'm not denying that.
	I have a tough time believing this woman doesn't talk politics in her house when she was a congressional black caucus.
	Come on.
	I think it's all these people do.
	I think every waking moment is political strategizing.
	And ripping people to shreds and commenting on them.
	She said, no, we don't do that.
	My six-year-old hates Donald Trump.
	You know, and the TV audience was, oh man, oh wow.
	Trump must be a really bad guy if this woman six-year-old hates if it's the impact this stuff's supposed to have.
	Quickly, Greg in uh in Raleigh in North Carolina.
	Glad you waited, sir.
	You're next.
	Hello, sir.
	Greg, are you there, testing one?
	Uh yes.
	Uh pleasure to talk to you, Roger.
	Thank you, sir.
	Uh, I appreciate everything that you've done.
	Your pep talks throughout the day has been really good because going into work and talking to my friends and my friends on Facebook, it's just really demoralizing to not get any sort of message through there.
	So I really hope you're right with what's going to be happening in the election.
	And I hope you haven't I hope I haven't fallen into your trap of trying to convince you that perhaps replacing Trump at the top of the ticket is the right way forward.
	And you might think that the media wins by doing that, but I don't think they do because they want to damage Trump at the top of the ticket going against Hillary.
	All the allegations just keeps uh damaging him and making him a worse candidate while it emboldens me and emboldens you to vote for him.
	That's not true of everybody else.
	She's kind of disgusted by his behavior.
	Let me tackle this because I've got 30 seconds to do this.
	If first place, the mechanism do that, there isn't time.
	And it would not be automatic that Pence would be the replacement.
	I mean, you'd have a bunch of conservative commentators and other Republicans.
	Well, if you're gonna get rid of Trump, you gotta get rid of the ticket and put somebody else in there.
	It'd be a big fight.
	But here's the thing.
	Whoever, if this were to ever happen, would get the same treatment that Trump is getting.
	They'd be called Trump Jr. or somebody couldn't they're gonna do the same thing to anybody that gets a nomination, always.
	Okay, so I just got an answer that makes sense.
	I have mothers emailing me in droves saying their kids learn to hate people at school, kindergarten, pre-K, school, that it would be entirely possible for this six-year-old to be hearing what a reprobate Trump is from teachers or other kids' school, be that easy.
	Remember, Rush, six-year-olds are not like you were.
	They're not at home.
	Mothers are not raising them, especially ones that run the congressional black Caucasians or out of daycare, pre-K, what have you.
	That makes sense.
	But this woman was trying to make it look this kid watching TV on his own, without any outside influences.
	This was her point, hated Trump.
	And that was proof of what a bad guy Trump is.
	That was the point that she was uh was trying to convey.
	Top ten Clinton scandals exposed by WikiLeaks so far.
	There's another two thousand page email dump that happened this morning that people are sifting through.
	Uh and just in in not any particular order, but numbered number one, Mrs. Clinton had cozy, improper relationships with the mainstream media.
	This is the reference to Donna Brazil, Democrat National Committee member giving Clinton campaign advanced notice of a CNN town hall series of questions that she thought might give Mrs. Clinton pause.
	Uh and by the way, the emails indicate that there were subjects issues that the Clintons and Clinton campaign was very nervous about.
	And they wanted to make sure that if the question came about those subjects that Mrs. Clinton had the answer down pat and memorized.
	And I forget the specific area of policy associated with the question Donna Brazil is said to have passed on.
	Was it a death penalty?
	Is a death penalty question?
	Okay.
	Um that's a tight rope question for the Democrats.
	Uh given their position on incarceration.
	Uh gun control is a tough call for them.
	I mean, they know the vast majority of the look.
	I know I found it was in 2000 when Al Gore was running as George W. Bush, and I was eternally shocked when Al Gore came out for the Second Amendment, totally against gun control.
	So wait a minute, what's happening here?
	So they must have polling data.
	And that has remained consistent.
	So they raise money off of wanting to do away with the second amendment, but they're not yet to the point where they can campaign on it.
	Too many people don't agree with them on it.
	And it was a question about the death penalty, and that gets tied in always with uh policing and so forth.
	So uh Brazil thought the question was gonna trip her up, and that's why she passed it on.
	According to the emails, the State Department paid special attention to friends of Bill.
	This is the Haiti aid answer that I gave.
	After the massive 2010 Haiti earthquake, a senior aid to uh Secretary of State Clinton repeatedly gave special attention to those identified by the abbreviations FOB, friend of Bill, or WJC VIPs, Clinton VIPs.
	The emails show that Mrs. Clinton State Department prioritized and benefited Mr. Clinton's friends in the $10 billion recovery effort.
	And don't forget, Clinton himself was also named to some UN group that was supervising relief efforts in Haiti.
	But again, the way it worked, and it's it's been done countless times.
	Haiti is just one example.
	When Hillary Secretary of State, the State Department allocates whatever the budget item is.
	In the case of earthquake destruction in Haiti, there was $10 billion authorized for aid in Haiti.
	So Hillary is in charge of who gets it as Secretary of State.
	She's in charge of where it goes.
	Well, it it goes to Haiti, but it doesn't.
	It goes to people that are going to rebuild Haiti, rebuild road schools, buildings, what have you.
	And the people that got those contracts were donors to the Clinton Crime Family Foundation.
	That's one of the reasons you donate.
	You donate.
	Here comes federal money, taxpayer dollars in the U.S. Treasury.
	Clinton disperses it to her donors to do the work in Haiti of rebuilding roads, bridges, schools, whatever the hell else.
	And of course, there's a lot left over.
	It's Haiti.
	You're not building mansions down there, you're rebuilding shanties and so forth.
	So they do that, and then some of the money of the 10 billion authorized for relief ends up back at the Clinton Foundation.
	The route is State Department to Hillary to donors doing rebuilding work, construction supplies, whatever in Haiti.
	Those people spend as little as they can on the relief efforts and the rebuilding, and then some of the money left they pocket, the other they donate back to the foundation.
	You can't walk over to the Treasury and write a check for $10 billion and have them give it to you.
	So the closest way getting that done is allocating relief money and hiring your friends and donors to do the work that that money is going for, and they don't use all of it and send some of it back to your foundation.
	And then and then your foundation, the way you run that, 7% goes to charity, 9% travel, entertainment, uh, another 5% salaries and so forth.
	It's scam, giant scam.
	And that's what the friend would be.
	And the emails in the WikiLeaks numb pretty much explain this.
	Mrs. Clinton argued for a hemispheric common market with open trade and open borders a number of times to enough different banks in these speeches she made over two years that netted her $21 million.
	Well, gross.
	She was paid $21 million over two years.
	Minimum $250,000 of speech.
	Maximum around $350,000.
	Speeches anywhere from 15 to 20, 25 minutes.
	And it was in some of these speeches where she told these bankers that her voters think she hates.
	And Bernie Sanders voters think, ah, these are Wall Street banks.
	They're the problem in America.
	And they think the Democrats are just going to get even with these banks because these banks got bailed out.
	TARP and all that.
	And they think the Clintons are going to really take it.
	Clintons are in bed with them.
	And so Hillary's telling these bankers what they want to hear.
	Hemispheric common market, open, open trade wherever, and open borders.
	I think one of the toughest cells that I think I have, and that I think anybody has.
	Now here's Mrs. Clinton and the Democrat Party at large, openly advocating open borders.
	They want specifically uneducated and low-educated and poor people flocking to this country from all over the world.
	And most people think that they are doing it because they're compassionate.
	Democrats have have very smartly secured ownership of that whole notion, big hearted compassion, concern for the little guy, big heart for the downtrodden.
	And so letting them come into America, why is that the epitome of compassion?
	The truth is that the modern Democrat Party, not the Democrat Party, even JFK from the 1960s, not even the party of LBJ, not even George McGovern.
	I mean, this Democrat Party today is an anti-American party in terms of the founding, anti-constitution.
	They don't believe the government should be limited.
	They don't believe that people should have wanton freedom.
	They want as many dependent people as possible.
	But this is about transforming the country.
	And the easiest way to do it is to flood this country with people who don't speak the language and are not going to learn it and can't assimilate and are not going to have jobs and are not going to have careers and are going to thus be totally dependent on government.
	Taxes are going to go way up.
	Jobs and wages are going to go way down.
	And as such, the Democrats are going to become empowered and wealthier and richer and walled off from the America they are creating.
	Because none of what they're importing and creating is going to reside anywhere near Washington or Manhattan or the Hamptons or Vale or Beaver Creek or Lake Tahoe or Seattle or wherever the hell they hole up, Atherton, California, wherever they are, those places are not going to be subjected to the America that will result from all of this that Mrs. Clinton, Barack Obama want to do.
	And convincing people that is one of the toughest sells.
	S-E-L-L, toughest sales jobs because people can't get their arms around.
	Why would anybody want to do that?
	Why would anybody want to destroy America?
	Then Rush, they're not saying that.
	They want America to be better.
	They want America to be more fair.
	They want it to be equal.
	No, no, that's just how they're getting you to not pay attention to what they're doing or to actually agree with it and facilitate it.
	But if they get away with it, you're not going to recognize the country.
	There's always going to be an America.
	It's just that it's not going to be the America that was founded.
	They can't coexist with the America that was founded.
	The America that was founded has a constitution which limits the power, limits the freedom, limits the role of government.
	Their whole agenda is controlling government, expanding it.
	It's just the acquisition of more and more power.
	But it's a tough thing to convince people of.
	But that's what this is, this set of emails is about.
	Promising the bankers, hemispheric common market and open trade and open borders means globalism, means shrinking America down to a size where it's really no different than any other country in the world.
	It's just part of the global mix.
	You get rid of nation states, per se get rid of boundaries and lines and so forth that uh define borders.
	And you can't, it's a very tough job to convince people why there are people who want to do that and how they benefit from it.
	But that is the objective, and that's another one of the things that's been exposed in this WikiLeaks email dump.
	I gotta take a break.
	And we've only got through half of these, and I've got more phone calls of yours to get to, so half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair, Rush Limbaugh not engaging in false optimism, deeply rooted in reality here at the EIB network.
	I mentioned earlier in the program 538, Nate Silver's done all this research and analysis of the polling data out there.
	You want to hear something that's interesting.
	If only men could vote, Donald Trump would win in a landslide.
	If only women could vote, Hillary would win.
	The gender divide is huge.
	Carol Costello, former stalker, media stalker, the EIB network.
	I mean, she reported on us all.
	She just ran around examining us all the time.
	She now infobabes anchors CNN in the morning, and she was talking about this morning on CNN's newsroom.
	Allow me to vent for just a moment.
	These maps that the 538 blog spawned.
	Okay, so these maps spawned a trending hashtag called repeal the 19th.
	That gave women the right to vote, by the way.
	Men are actually tweeting stuff like this quote, if women are the only thing stopping the greatest president this country has ever seen, why not repeal the 19th?
	Trump train.
	Really?
	First, dudes, dudes, you are delusional.
	And secondly, dudes, who raised you?
	She can't believe it that there are men out there actually tweeting repeal the 19th to prevent women from voting so that Trump wins.
	She's mortally offended by this.
	No, no sense of humor.
	No!
	Are you kidding?
	At CNN?
	Sense of humor?
	There's no sense of humor on the left anyway.
	It's offensive to laugh.
	Somebody's offended when you laugh.
	Dudes!
	Dudes!
	Who raised you?
	Dudes!
	Dudes, why aren't you going to college?
	The answer is the same.
	Okay, folks, look, just hang in, and we still don't know where things are headed.
	We know where the media wants you to think.
	They're headed, but uh stay up, stay engaged.
	Don't let them convert you into a depressed not quitter.
	Just just don't cave yet.
	It's not time.
	That's what they want.
	We don't know how it's gonna end up yet, is the point.
	They don't either.
	And we'll see you back here tomorrow.

▲