All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 28, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:41
September 28, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
You know, it's always the unexpected.
It seems like it's always the unexpected.
Who would have believed that whether or not a former Miss Universe became a Miss Piggy and a porn star would become such a big deal in the campaign, but it has.
It's the biggest stack I got.
I got stacks of stuff here, and the porn star Miss Piggy, former who's now campaigning with Hillary.
A former porn star is campaigning for Hillary against Trump.
As is, and then Howard Dean's not backing off the uh the notion that uh that that Trump's snorting cocaine out there.
It appears, folks, that I have ruined the post-debate aftermath for Mark Alpern and John Heileman at uh at because my well wait till you hear.
You know, here I've got the sound bites coming up.
They they they're they were just feeling all jazzed and really up and and and thinking the top of the world, and I came along with my post-debate analysis and and and and ruined it for them, as you will hear in uh in due course.
And look at these headlines.
The conventional wisdom in the drive by is that Hillary just knocked this out of the park, right?
I mean, it was a slam dunk.
After the first 20 minutes, man, oh man, Hillary owned this thing.
Trump's obviously lack of preparation, obvious lack of preparation, clearly on display, they are saying.
And then check these two headlines.
First in the Hill.com, Clinton feels the pressure.
Why?
I mean, if it's such a slam dunk, why is she feeling the pressure?
If she's such a winner, if she's the smartest woman in the world, is she more qualified to be president than anybody ever?
Including Jorge Washington.
Oh, speaking of, have you heard what Capernick said lately?
Guy, you know, the NFL ratings are continuing to slide, and they're wondering the NFL office.
You know what their reasoning is?
The NFL to the extent that anybody they're not really officially addressing it, so uh, but but people in the NFL office are talking to various sports drive-bys, and what they're leaking out there is the lack of marquee matchups, such as the Sunday night game of the Cowboys and Bears was a yawner, who cares?
There really aren't any big stars recognizable to most teams.
The stars that are recognizable, Tony Romo and Jay Cutler, big whoop, they didn't play, wouldn't have made much difference if they had, in terms of star factor, uh, is down everywhere, and they can't figure it out.
They just think it's lack of star power.
Uh lack of great matchups, lack of uh of great football and so forth, but it's gonna they're just they refuse to see the elephant in the room.
I understand why they wouldn't want to acknowledge it, but you would hope that in a deep dark crevices of the NFL office, they're kind of getting a handle here on what might be going wrong.
What what how hard do they have to look here to find out what might be causing people to become a little less passionate?
Anyway, we will address that as the program unfolds.
Clinton feels a pressure.
Why?
Even after a strong debate, Clinton has a huge staff advantage over Trump.
The electoral college tilted in her favor.
She's running to succeed Obama, who's a popular president.
She run against Trump who ought to be the easiest candidate for president ever to beat.
And despite all that, she finds herself in an excruciatingly tight race.
Why are I 50 points ahead?
Apparently she's feeling the pressure.
The next headline from Politico.
Clinton campaign in panic mode over Florida black voters.
This story is from today.
This is a post-debate story.
This is not something held over from prior to the debate.
Democrats are sweating over turnout in one of the most important states of the electoral map, and they don't even mention her.
She essentially pulled out of Ohio, which I still don't get.
I that still doesn't make any sense to me, but they have suspended their advertising in Ohio.
And the political story goes on to the document, you know, what why problem with black voters in um in Florida, not nationwide.
And I saw this and I just, you know, I knew this was gonna happen.
BizPack Review has the uh story.
Amazon deletes over 1,000 bad reviews to cover for Hillary's abysmal book sales.
Clinton has a new book.
It's called Stronger Together.
She co-wrote it with Tim Kane, the vice president.
They didn't write anything.
This is ghostwritten.
Everybody knows that.
It's been met with abysmal sales, critical reviews.
Amazon.com came to the rescue by reportedly removing negative reviews of the book from its website, according to our buddies at WorldNet Daily.
Doesn't surprise me if it's true.
Folks, the entire professional political and media apparatus has come together on one side of the aisle, and alone on the other side is Donald Trump.
And there is no mistaking this.
They are cheating, rigging, they're using the power they have to stack the deck.
Mrs. Clinton, who has often played the victim card as a woman who is a victim of an unlevel playing field, is clearly leading a ragtag bunch of partisans, which is doing everything it can to maintain an unlevel playing field.
Little things like and what what Google is doing with their searches and Amazon now eliminating negative reviews.
That means there probably aren't any reviews except the ones the Clinton campaign has submitted.
Her memoir book, for which she got a $14 million advance.
That didn't sell.
She didn't draw anybody to book signings.
They had to shut down the whole book tour.
It was dead in the water.
She simply doesn't have.
They all know this.
They all know it, and they're in denial.
They know she has no personal connection, even with the people voting for her.
She has a personal connection, people who know her and the fundraisers and donors, but I'm I mean, you know, average Tom Dick and Willie out there, they're going to vote for her just because they're Democrat D next to her name.
She doesn't personally connect with them.
She doesn't stimulate any excitement.
And they know this.
They're the ones living in denial when they tell themselves what a great debate she had.
Because if she had such a great debate, what the way for the polls?
If she had such a great debate, it ought to be reflected in the polls, shouldn't it?
If she had such a great debate, if this was such a slam dunker, we'll find out.
She should pull ahead dramatically.
If what they're saying about this debate is true, that Trump was humiliated, that Trump was embarrassed, that Trump was embarrassing, that Hillary was dynamic, that Hillary was on her game, that Hillary was dangling around by the nose, and Hillary had him white rushing.
Testicle lockbox was in full display.
She just owned the night.
Well, the poll data should reflect this, should it not?
So we will see.
Grab audio soundbice number three and four.
Last night, Bloomberg Televisions, with all due respect, that's the show that's co-hosted by John Heileman and Mark Halprin.
Mark Halpern, known for work is his work at uh ABC, ABC News.
For many, many moons.
Uh Halperin's uh and Heileman write this book every campaign.
That they release after the election that contains all kinds of stories.
Um tidbits of information that they hold for after the election about, I think both campaigns.
And it's clearly a financial effort.
I mean, it's the information they gathered during the campaign, they hold it, they shield it, they reserve it.
They back burner it for their book that comes out after the election, and some of the stuff they learn and find out have they used it during the campaign.
You never know, might have had some impact.
But all the anecdotes, all little stories, uh tidbits of information, even some off-the-record stuff that people share with them.
They hold all of that.
That's who these two guys are.
If you don't watch their Show on Bloomberg TV.
And we occasionally use sound bites in these guys because we like them.
I mean, they are they are excellent illustrations, classic representations of the political establishment slash media.
What these guys think and their attitude and their view of things is pretty good window to what the entire conventional wisdom of the Washington, New York, Boston political corridor axis is.
So we go to the audio sound bites, and Heileman and Halperin are talking about Trump and the presidential debate.
And Heileman says, Do you believe he's talking to uh Mark Halper and his co-hosts, is you believe at this point that it would do Trump any good politically to just admit that he lost the debate.
Just admit it, and then start shaping up for the next one.
This morning I thought he should say, you know, because my first time debating, you know, I didn't like the way the questions went, but I'm gonna do better next time.
But now I don't think so.
I think his supporters, you know, Rush Limbaugh said he won.
I think as brazen as it is and as uh counterfactual to a lot of what how people experience the debate, I think he should just tough it through, pretend it didn't happen and hope that it doesn't impact the polls, in which case the national polls and the Battleground State polls, in which he can just say, hey, I didn't lose.
So I once again have confounded what these guys think should happen.
Trump was so bad, in their opinion, that he should just admit it, because everybody knows it.
There's no reason to act like it didn't happen.
This is their thinking, and just own up to it.
You know, just be honest with the audience.
The audience knows that you sucked Mr. Trump.
The audience knows you were terrible.
Let them know that you know, Mr. Trump, and build a bridge of strict relating with them.
You tell them, Mr. Trump, that you know how bad you were, they already know, and they'll think you're an honest guy.
That's what they want Trump to do, until I entered the fray yesterday with my post-debate analysis, which has now thrown a monkey wrench into what these guys, Halpern and Heileman, want to happen.
Mr. Sturdley, it's a technical point.
I need to ask you, did I actually say that Trump won the debate.
I said, right, I said that Snap polls showed that he won, all but the CNN poll.
I also said that Snap polls are not scientific polls.
They're Internet of the Moment polls, they capture the passion of the moment.
Um I also said that the drive-bys, like these two guys, looking at that debate still fail to understand how Trump supporters view Trump.
So when they analyze these debates in terms of who won a talking point, like when Trump failed to hit one of these hanging curveballs, these guys really missed it there, that's bad.
Trump lost some stuff there, man.
That was a golden.
His supporters didn't abandon him because of any of that.
And that's uh other than that that analysis, therefore, is irrelevant.
If you go issue by issue, point by point, question by question, answer by answer, yeah.
Oh my god, did you see how he could have hit.
And if they think that this is how people decide who they're gonna support for it, in fact, there has been a serious poll.
And I'm off top of my head, I don't remember it.
It's uh who it is.
Maybe it's morning consult.
And here's the deal on it.
It pretty much agrees with the CNN poll.
Something like 60% think that Hillary won 27, 29% think that Trump won.
However, only 9% say that the debate will have any effect on their vote.
Only 9%, which is my sole point.
In discussing this, these guys in the establishment, they analyze this answer by answer, sometimes sentence by sentence.
Yeah, that was bad.
Trump's a bad point.
He should have said that.
Oh, yeah, as though Trump supporters are sitting out there listening.
He said that, all right, that's it, Mabel.
We're not voting for Trump.
I can't believe.
And it's the same thing with Hillary.
People just don't watch him this way.
But particularly in the case of Trump.
His supporters are in this for all kinds of different reasons.
And if if these guys inside the Beltway are going to continue to judge this as though Trump is a seasoned politician when he's not.
As though Trump had Trump doesn't have a public record.
Whatever is going on in this country right now, you cannot blame any of it on Donald Trump, including Iraq and the Iraq War.
Hillary Clinton, you can attach her to everything that's happened in this country, pretty much, particularly the last eight years and when she was a senator and when she was a first lady.
Trump, none of that.
Trump is a rookie.
Trump is a genuine outsider.
He has no fingerprints on anything.
And yet they're analyzing this debate as though Trump is as much a part of the system as Hillary is, and he's not.
In any way, he doesn't have the experience.
He's got television experience.
He doesn't have the actual business of politics experience.
I think it's actually a phenomenal achievement for Trump to be judged in this way.
Now they think judging Trump this way is the best way to disqualify him, but they don't get that his supporters and a lot of other people are not looking at it that way.
They know who Trump is.
They know he's an outsider.
The expectations they have for Trump are entirely different than the expectations Hillary's supporters have for her.
And I think, folks, this is a profound point.
I call them profundities.
How everybody in the establishment insists on plugging Trump in to their world when he hasn't been a part of it, other than maybe as a donor.
But aside from he hasn't been a part of it at all.
You can't blame anything.
They talk about Trump's plan for ISIS.
They talk about Trump's plan for the economy as though...
He doesn't have any past experience with any this.
That's the attractiveness.
That is the allure.
We are going to find out in November how many American voters actually think it might be time to try a genuine outsider.
That's what this is really all about.
But these people continue to judge Trump and these debate performances and everything else as though he is an abysmal failure in their system who has no business being there.
It's like Michael Goodwin in the New York Post today wrote that if if the media is not careful, they're gonna win this election for Trump.
That the media might actually be Hillary Clinton's biggest problem, even though it doesn't look like that, it looks like just the exact opposite, her biggest asset.
Here's the next soundbite, by the way, got to get this in before the break.
This is Heileman going back to Halpern after I was blamed for not recognizing Trump lost.
He plainly lost the debate.
The big difference to me between this and 2012, when Barack Obama failed in Denver in the first debate, he confronted mass panic among his supporters.
He had to admit that he lost and that he would do better the next time because Democrats are freaking out.
Trump fans are not freaking out.
Trump fans saw a different debate that we saw last night.
They think he won.
They judge it a different way.
They didn't see anything differently.
They're judging it a different way.
This isn't hard unless you somehow are so locked into this establishment mode of thinking that you can't get out of it for a while.
If you establishment types really, really want to understand how Trump supporters look at this, if you really do, let me remind you of something.
By the way, I'm proud of how often I'm seeing this pop up in columns and opinion pieces, by the way.
It is something I have been reminding people of for the past month.
You guys in the drive-by's and handling analyzing Hillary's debate, you're you're judging rhetoric.
You're judging the spoken word.
You are you that that's how you define intelligence, intellectual speak, uh communicate, well, really, really smart, really Obama intellectual speaker It's uh specific pattern of speech makes everything very smart.
People don't remember that.
People, like today, people don't remember what anybody said in that debate.
And by the end of the day today, they really won't remember.
But they are not gonna forget how they felt during that debate.
You know, I'm I'm one of these guys that I I lament the role feelings plays in so much of our culture, but I can't deny it.
And it's this is unalterably true.
People, uh unless you have a particularly advanced power of communication skill like I do.
People do remember what I say.
Most people do not, but they never forget how you make them feel.
And I'm telling you, Hillary didn't make anybody feel special at night.
She did she came across as robotic, you know, a witch with a capital B. Uh and Trump inspired feelings among his supporters that they enjoyed and wanted more of.
So now you have to look at this in part.
Okay, have a little more polling data here.
Taken uh during and after the debate.
Now, sadly, I don't know whose poll this is because of the quirks in how things are formatted to send an email.
Sometimes the link is left off.
So I it it looks like a political morning greeting email that they blast out to everybody, or maybe from hotline.
I don't know where this is from, but it really doesn't matter because the details in it are true.
Uh brand new post-debate poll that confirms Hillary Clinton got a small bump over Trump from her performance.
She is up three points among likely voters in the political morning consult poll.
That's the poll I just quoted you.
Before the debate, Trump was up one point in this poll.
But as I mentioned, the nut of this poll, I mean, the money line in this poll, just nine percent of respondents said the debate changed their mind.
Just nine percent.
Doesn't surprise me.
I fact I'm surprised it's that high.
Debates traditionally don't unless there's a major gaffe in them.
I mean, look at Obama's first debate with Romney in 2003.
It was a disaster.
These guys, Heileman and Halpern, they're out there talking about such a disaster, Obama had to go out there and admit it.
And that's what they want Trump to do.
But now Trump can't do it because I didn't say it was a disaster.
So since I didn't say it was a disaster, Trump has cover not to say it was a disaster, and they're mad about that.
They want Trump to say it was a disaster.
Of course they do.
But I maintain to you, again, everybody saw the same debate.
It's just that they see it different ways.
They're looking for different things.
And as I say, I'm really proud, for I must tell you this little bromide of mine is being picked up.
And of course in countless, I can't tell you how many times I've seen this.
Just in the last week.
Then it's this.
It's very simple.
People will not remember what you say, what you tell them, but they'll never forget how you make them feel.
And Hillary is never going to win that one.
She's never gonna be the clear winner in how she makes people feel.
The facial expressions, the nurse ratchet looks, the plastered robotic smile to try to cover that up.
I guarantee you, and the drive-by didn't even see it.
These great analysts in the media on the Democrat, they don't even see it.
They see a totally different Hillary from the one we saw.
They saw one that just brilliant and on point and didn't stutter and had all of her talking points down to just nailed Trump left and right.
But they didn't see.
They didn't see the aspects of Hillary Clinton that rub a vast majority of people the wrong way.
Because they don't want to see them.
I I maintain it's it's those guys that are in denial.
Not me.
Here's some other key findings in this poll, the uh political morning consult poll.
Lester Holt was seen as fair.
Forty-two percent said he was fair, twenty-seven percent said he was more favorable to Clinton.
Look, not a beat a dead horse, but it was Lester knew what was gonna happen to him if if he didn't tow the line.
He saw what they did to Matt Wower.
He saw what they were trying to do to Jimmy Fallon.
There was no Lester Holt was not fair.
Lester Holt was not even-handed.
Lester Holt was he behaved entirely differently with Trump.
Again, it's worth making the point, folks, that in one way you can look at this as a very big compliment to Trump.
He's being treated as though he has a career in the business of politics, as though he has a record.
He's being treated as though he matters and is a factor, and he doesn't have his fingerprints on anything that they talk about.
Donald Trump doesn't have a tax policy yet.
Donald Trump, whatever he thinks about things, it cannot be said to be a problem in the country today because he hasn't done anything.
That's why Trump keeps focusing on his business success.
That's his record.
You know, people say, What does he keep bragging about?
He's not bragging about it.
He's informing people.
Hillary brags about her record, lying about it left and right.
Lester doesn't even bring up the scandals at Benghazi, the scandals with her email, the scandal of the Clinton Foundation.
Those things don't even come up.
But it's Trump's job to bring them up.
The moderator isn't going to do that.
The moderator's not going to expose Hillary to any problems.
Trump's going to have to do it.
And I predict you he will in upcoming debates.
Trump's got to talk about his record.
And the fact that he knows how to run successful businesses.
I venture to say that there are a hell of a lot more people in business and handling money and generating profit and creating jobs than anybody in government.
Government doesn't create jobs for crying out loud, and Hillary Clinton doesn't know the first thing about it anyway.
Neither does Barack Obama.
Hillary Clinton doesn't know the first thing about health care other than theory, sitting around discussing it with a bunch of other liberals in the faculty lounge.
Obama has demonstrated he has a diddly squat about health care, about websites, about the world wide web that he wants to give away to the UN.
They don't know.
They have no practical experience in these areas they want to take over and are taking over.
Hillary Clinton has nothing.
She knows nothing about the energy business, but she thinks she does.
And what she believes, this climate change hoax, putting those beliefs into popular practice is a disaster for the United States energy economy.
Barack Obama doesn't know anything about climate science.
He doesn't know anything about energy.
They have never been in that world.
They've spent their lives resenting it.
They've spent their lives trying to punish people, in fact, who are successful in various elements of corporate life.
You talk about arrogance or hubris in the idea that a bunch of rhetoricians and theoreticians know better how to build buildings, housing areas, developments, and so forth.
Pharmaceutical companies, energy comp, they know like you hear Hillary talking about all the wonderful things we can do with solar panels, solar panels, solar panels.
Solar pan, they're not sustainable.
Solar panels are not sustainable millennials.
May sound good, yes, clean, renewable energy.
But what do you do when the sun's down at night?
What do you do when the clouds obscure the sun?
We're not there yet.
But that's not off the beaten path.
Beaten path is these people, Hillary Clinton, 30-year track record in Washington, and you can track the messes and you can track the flub-ups, you can track the incompetence, you can track many times, and you can also track something else.
30 years and no successful track record.
Hillary Clinton, after 30 years or 25, whatever it is, is still pushing the same things that she came into public life pushing.
Hate trickled down, hate Reagan, tax the rich.
Rich aren't paying their fair share.
That's the starting point, and nothing has changed.
Hillary Clinton and her husband Have been in business for 30, 25 years, and she is still promising to do the same things.
She's still cataloging the same problems.
Where is talk about Trump and he's not trustworthy?
Where she has a clear record of dismal failure.
And Hillary's record has cost lives.
Hillary Clinton working in government has cost people their lives.
Donald Trump hasn't done that.
And yet they want to compare Trump and they want to try to plug him into the same system that Hillary Clinton's life has been.
And in that way, Judge Trump is not even welcome.
He's not even welcome in our establishment.
He's not even welcome in our system.
He's not qualified.
He's not of the right temperament.
Yeah, and so they point us to great success stories like Hillary Clinton, right?
I'm telling you, the American people are wise enough, enough of them are to not fall for this.
Mrs. Clinton can't point to anything but caring.
They say nobody's done more for children than Hillary.
Where?
What?
I'm serious.
What has she done?
Well, she's been all that time with Marion Wright Edelman of the Children's Defense Fund.
Yeah, but what happened there?
Well, you know, they cared about kids.
Yeah, but but what do they do caring about kids?
Well, you know, they they protected them from their from their abusive fathers.
Oh, is that what they did?
Yeah.
Yeah, that's what they protected children from their abusive fathers.
And then where is this endless parade of people who one time were children, that Hillary Clinton took under her broomstick and shepherded to adulthood to now happy, productive life.
Where are these people?
Where is the walking evidence of all of Hillary's caring?
They can't do that.
So what do they do?
They turn fire on Trump and tell you that he's all sorts of bad, all sorts of mean, all sorts of evil.
And it doesn't, they'd be doing the same thing if the nominee were Ted Cruz.
In fact, it would even be worse if it were Cruz, because they would be zeroing in on all kinds of conservative issues that they just despise and are scared to death of.
So in addition to what they're trying to do to Trump, and the same bit Marco Rubio, even if it had been Kasich, it'd be the same thing, because that's all they've got.
They don't have a candidate in Mrs. Clinton that they can bally who, that they can promote, that they can cite a record experience of great achievement and accomplishment, unity.
Can't do it.
And so while doing all that, they then try to trug uh plug Trump into this same system because it that's the only way they can really disqualify him.
If they treat Trump as the person he really is, the outsider, who represents a whole new way of trying to do things since this country's on the wrong track, and the people who've been telling us they are our betters and they know more and they care more, are making a disaster of things.
I like to point out the college degree, the college education has something the Washington establishment has really damaged.
The college degree, the college education has been sold, and it's been bought as the ticket.
Families all across this country from every income quintile, except the idea that their kids have to go to college, that if they don't, it's gonna be tougher.
Going to college is still the dream.
Going to college and getting a degree is still the ticket.
Gotta do it.
Well, look now what they've done to the college degree.
They have essentially turned it into an albatross.
Each graduate leaves college with an amount of debt, or the vast majority was so much debt in student loans, that they're behind the eight ball for years, if they can then find jobs in their majors that qualify as careers featuring advancement.
So all these brilliant people, the best and brightest people in the establishment, smarter than we are, better than we are, more caring in all this.
The and the college education as an institution for Americans to climb the ladder of success.
They've done great damage to it, as well as a lot of other institutions of traditional.
Trump represents an alternative way.
And so his supporters are not judging him on debate points and not judging him on...
I mean, they disappointed he didn't destroy her when he had the chance.
I mean, I think that's the big deal.
Trump supporters think that he had a chance to really inflict major political harm.
And didn't because he either missed it, too busy thinking about himself, making everything personal, or just wasn't repaired or whatever.
But that anger is not the kind of anger because it'll make him leave him.
It's kind of anger that makes him frustrated and hellbent on him doing better.
Anyway, brief.
Oh, one other stat.
Forty-five percent of people who watched the debate said they did not watch the whole thing.
That was a number I was waiting.
I was curious.
Forty five percent said I don't know how long they watched.
I don't have that data yet.
Forty-five percent said they didn't watch the whole thing, and 55% lied and said that they did.
Couple more bites.
Not I'm not torn here.
Do I grab a call?
Do I get these cool sound bites?
And I've got a great Newt Gingrich piece here called uh IYT.
Intellectual yet idiot.
I IYI, intellectual yet idiot, to describe establishment types the way they analyze the debate.
He pretty much echoing what I said.
Uh but here let's go to the phones.
Let's grab Dan in St. Louis.
Great to have you, sir.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Rush, it's an absolute uh honor to speak with you.
Thank you so much for taking my call.
I I couldn't be more thrilled to be talking to you.
I appreciate that, sir.
Thank you very much.
Um 31 years old, millennial by age, not by association, not my fault that I was born with them, but um fiscal conservative.
I'm a much more um more product of my own environment when it comes to social issues such as gay marriage, uh, you know, uh birth control, those types of things.
So for the last few years, I mean, really since my first time voting in O4, I've not been too excited about our candidate.
Because they just allowed uh the liberals to control the narrative and you know, around me with a racist and a bigot towards women and all this other nonsense.
With Trump, uh never was all that thrilled about him.
Um didn't really have a candidate at all this year.
I was too excited about.
For me, watching the debate was not at all about who is going to win or lose.
The points they're going to make, I know where Hillary stands.
I can't stand Hillary Clinton.
Uh what I was looking for is can Trump hold himself in a presidential manner for 90 minutes without coming unglued or looking making a fool of himself, really.
Um what the debate did for me was reinforced my thoughts.
I I just cannot stand the populist message, the pompous arrogance that Hillary displayed.
And I watched the debate and I thought Trump did a pretty good job when it comes to holding his temper and not coming across as being obnoxious or rude or interruptive.
I went to bed after the debate, kind of digested it, woke up in the morning, and here's the internet everywhere on the internet.
Trump interrupts, he's rude, he's blasted.
Hillary Hillary slams him in the first debate, knocks him out.
I just didn't buy that at all.
For me, Trump did a great job.
He held himself, and and really where I wasn't all that excited about voting for him in the past.
Yeah, look, it's a debate.
For crying out loud, it's a debate, and you can't wait to be asked to say what you want to say, and if somebody's lying about you, Trump has always known there's nothing new in it.
That look at that's a classic example of how they saw it completely differently than you did, even you're watching the same debate.
You saw something else.
And you make a great point.
My I I have a lot of uh Trump supporters, uh, just paranoid that Trump's gonna lose supporters by virtue of uh this or that lack of accomplishment of the debate.
I just don't see that.
I uh that's not Trump supporters are not that thinly attached to him, as you are, as you're pointing out.
Anyway, I pr Dan, I really appreciate the call.
Thank you, uh thank you much.
Thirty one year old millennial, product of his environment on social issues.
Which uh we understand that.
I gotta take a break, however.
I wish I could continue here, but I can't.
Okay, folks, fastest three hours in media.
First hour is uh in the canon gone.
Over to the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum, stored forever in our archival files.
▲
Export Selection