All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 5, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:50
September 5, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 247 Podcast.
Okay, I'm going to ask the question again.
I asked a question yesterday and needs to be asked a lot.
As we keep hearing even today with the Clinton Family Foundation, what a great, great body of work they do there.
There's nothing to see there.
And nothing to see.
All this interaction between the Crint Clinton Foundation Estate Department and just a bunch of people requesting access.
I mean, that's not any big deal.
What's the big deal wanting access?
That's not favors.
I mean, the drive-by is a filled with that theme today.
No, no, no.
Nobody sought favors.
They just wanted access.
Access is the favor.
For crying out loud, what's so hard about this?
Access when you are an entity, a country, an individual, uh a member of evil corp, wherever you are, and you and Hillary Clinton's a Secretary of State, and you want to reach her, and you know if you call the Secretary of State, that line, you call the Department of State, they're not gonna put you through.
So what do you do?
You call the Clinton Crime Family Foundation, and then Cheryl Mills gets hold of Huma Abidin Weiner, and Huma Abidine Wiener then tells Hillary, hey, such and such wants to talk to you.
And they say, Yeah, yeah, that happened, but that's just access.
Access is the favor.
And to think that no favors have been done or promised is absurd, but the drive visor turns, it's just access is no big deal.
It's the way of the world, they're saying.
And it may well be, folks.
I think it is.
I think this is this is a perfect illustration of what being a member of the establishment gets you.
This kind of access, this kind of favorable treatment, this kind of uh acceptance and the upper levels of power.
Greetings, great to have you.
L Rushbow here behind the golden EIB microphone.
The telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address, again, it's a new one.
It is L Rushbow at EIB net.us.
Ah, hang on a minute here, folks.
My microphone boom is the latest piece of equipment here on the blitz.
One second.
There we go.
I got it.
Here's the question.
If they do such good work over there at the Clinton Crime Family Foundation, why is the Clinton Foundation not offering any help, any aid, any money, any food, any cell phones to the devastrated dare I say white population in Louisiana.
Yeah, Obama's got it covered today after 10 or 11 rounds of golf.
Obama's going down there today, or is it is it Thursday that he's going?
Supposed to be in there today.
But okay, within the hour.
Why didn't I s I should have suspected he would arrive during this program?
Of course that's what they would do.
Seriously.
So Bama's got that covered.
I mean, the Clinton Crime Family Foundation was all over Haiti.
They were all I I think they maybe they can't make any money in Louisiana.
That's what the Clinton Crime Family Foundation's really all about, is securing donations, not making payouts.
Anyone figured this out yet?
You look at the payouts of the Clinton Crime Family Foundation, it's not much.
The Clinton Crime Family Foundation is a way to support all of the members of the Clinton Crime Family.
And to have them travel around in the lap of luxury.
But I mean, we're hearing about what great charitable work is done there.
We're hearing about how compassionate the Clinton Foundation is, and yet here's Louisiana with record flooding.
You know, we we we know some people who have uh uh incurred some some great damage down there, the fish god.
We have a friend, Kathy and Steve Abernathy used to be at Brennan's in uh in New Orleans, and Steve's the fish god.
I call him the fish god, he raised tilapia.
And I went down, I visited the fish farm.
I'd never been to a fish farm before, so I went down there.
I landed in New Orleans, had to drive all the way across Lake Poncha Train to get to the uh to get to the fish farm.
And these these tilapia, these giant, giant circular tanks, and any time you would move, those those fish would try to swim away from you.
They could see you.
And they were afraid of you.
We weren't gonna do anything to them except eat them later, which I guess they knew.
And the fish god went on to tell me about how he genetically modified them and changed the sex so that he would have more female tilapia laying eggs so that there'd be more hatched and more fish to sell.
So when I found out he could change the sex of a tilapia, I started calling him the fish god.
So anyway, they had some damage.
The fish tanks didn't suffer any, but some of the buildings where their office supplies are housed had like three or four feet of water in them.
And there's all kinds of people who've had uh loss of home and everything they have is gone.
And they're largely white.
And you know that skin color matters in this country more maybe than it ever has.
And you know how everything has become politicized in this country.
Some people don't want to acknowledge or admit that.
But uh but it has.
But it's uh it's a late, late arrival for the U.S. government on the scene in Louisiana, no matter who goes.
But I just I do think it's a relevant question to ask about because I how about if Hillary did order her foundation to go do some work in Louisiana?
Imagine the photo op and the goodwill she could get out of that in the midst of a presidential campaign, and they're seeking not to do it.
And not just in Louisiana, but some other places too.
And I think the reason is because they don't want to establish the precedent that the purpose of that foundation is to pay out a lot of money.
You know, I don't know how many of you people have uh actually looked into establishing a foundation.
Anybody can.
Anybody can do it.
And a lot of people who do it do it as a means of making bulk charitable donations for tax deduction purposes, in addition to whatever charitable work they want to do.
But let me just use a round number here, and I'm gonna be fairly close to how this works.
Let's say you set up a foundation for uh $100,000.
And if that's what you put into your foundation, you'll get to deduct $100,000 through taxes that year and whatever your income tax rate is.
But the kicker is this.
You don't ever have to put any more money in it, but you can, and you can go out and ask people to donate to it.
You can run golf tournaments, anything you want to have people donate to your foundation, a kicker.
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong.
You only have to donate 10% a year from it to keep it qualified as a charity.
You can hoard all them.
Now you theoretically, you can't use the money.
Once you've put it in there, it's not yours anymore.
The only way it can be spent is for travel and expenses of the employees of the foundation, if you want to hire some, which is what the Clintons have done, or donating it.
But you can get a full tax deduction of whatever you fund that that foundation that you've set up in a year, but you don't have to give it all away every year to get the deduction.
You only have to give away five or ten percent.
It may not even be that much.
And this is why I say the reason I'm guessing that the Clintons have not set this foundation up to be on site at every disaster is that they don't want to establish the idea that the purpose of their foundation is to deal with charities.
They they do it now and then, but that's not why they've set this up.
This their charitable foundation is a hoover.
It is sucking things up.
I mean, the the crown prince of Bahrain and 32 million dollars.
And we mentioned this yesterday, and people say, what could he possibly expect to get?
Well, nothing from the foundation.
But if Mrs. Clinton either as Secretary of State or becomes president, well, then who knows?
And that's what it's for.
So the drive-by's running around saying there's nothing to see here.
All they're doing is providing access.
There aren't any favors being done.
The favor is the access.
Great to have you with us, my friends.
The question again needs to be asked.
Why is the Clinton Family Foundation not offering help, aid, money, food, cell phones to the devastated population of Louisiana.
An accompanying story, Clinton rakes in four million dollars while Louisiana drowns.
This is the Daily Caller.
Hillary Clinton has yet to set a date to visit Louisiana, which was recently devastated by historic flooding, but she managed to raise millions of dollars in campaign contributions over the weekend.
She found time to go on Jimmy Kimmel's show, where she was, you you ought to see the video that she's so stiff and uh and unfunny.
Like Kimmel is talking.
Here's a classic joke that they they set up.
And she didn't blow it, but it's not executed well.
So Kimmel asks her what it's like to be a grandmother.
Oh, it's just wonderful.
I don't know where I'd be without FaceTime.
And Kimmel says, oh, FaceTime instead of emails.
The audience busts out laughing.
Hillary fakes like she's laughing.
Oh ha ha ha!
Oh points at Kimbo.
Oh, you're funny.
Oh, you're as though she's in on the joke.
And the drive-by's are heralding this.
They're saying Hillary's got the guts and the temerity to go on there and has the ability to laugh at the circumstance.
But again, we have to keep in mind how the have a low information crowd, and it's the low information crowd watching this show.
How they see this and they see this email thing being laughed about and made a joke of, and therefore can't be anything serious.
Because Kimball's audience, they're pretty sure that if this were a serious thing, Jimmy Kimmel would be treating it seriously.
And he'd be trying to bore in there and get to the bottom of it.
But he's laughing about it with her.
So how big a deal can it be?
And then if you go elsewhere, it's amazing.
Folks, this is amazing.
I still don't know how to how to take this.
No matter where you go in the drive-by media today, yesterday, last week, you can find near paranoia about this in certain Democrat circles.
You can find the Washington Post is paranoid about this.
They you uh like the political has a story that this email thing, State Department Security, private servers, classified documents.
There are leftists writing that they are worried this is going to hound her for the rest of her political life.
That she's never going to be out from under this, and it's going to undercut her effectiveness, her integrity, her honesty.
And yet, nothing's gonna happen.
Is anybody really even now think anything is gonna happen?
Okay, so the latest is Huma Abedin.
Guess what we found out?
Huma has been driving around with classified documents in the car.
And she came across a sex toy store, get something for her husband.
She got out, she left the stuff on the front seat.
She left the classified documents on the front seat or going into the sex toy store.
I'm making that part up.
I I don't know that she actually went to a sex toy store for her husband, but she went somewhere.
It might have been to a Kinko's, which she might have thought was a sex toy store.
It's actually a printing shop.
She might have gone in there, who knows.
But she left the classified documents front seat, and she realized she called somebody, she says, You got to get over there and get them out of the front seat.
You've got to put them in the trunk of my car.
Classified State Department documents on the front seat of the automobile being driven by Huma Wiener.
Where she called.
And it's still there's nothing that's going to happen here.
I can't see it happening.
At least not in a legal judicial sense.
Actually affecting her in the polls or on election day, remains to be seen.
You know, there's so many confusing things out there.
There's literally no energy in her campaign.
She doesn't draw flies.
She can't attract and hold a crowd whatsoever.
And when people do show up, they're bored silly.
When it's 95 degrees and every woman in the picture is wearing tank tops and shorts, Hillary is decked out like it's wintertime in Moscow.
She's got her her Nehru jacket or Mao jacket on.
She got long slacks, practically gloves.
I mean, it's the weirdest looking thing anyway, and always standing under an umbrella or a tent to uh shield herself from the from the sun.
And yet, with despite despite any, I mean, literally, folks, despite any evidence of her popularity, she is leading in the polls significantly.
And then you go over and you look at Trump, and everywhere Trump goes, you can't get in.
The people that do get in are having a raucous good time.
There is excitement.
Trump does performances, everybody's excited and thrilled to be in there.
There's lots of energy everywhere he goes.
It is so big, it is so exciting, it is so much fun that that Hillary protesters show up and try to cause trouble.
So you look at this, you look at one candidate who can't draw flies and is not even trying to anymore, doesn't even do rallies, hardly does anything in public, and when she does, nobody notices, and she's leading, and over here the guy that looks like a rock star is losing in the polls.
And people are out there scratching their heads over this, not quite understanding it.
Selena Gomez, sorry, Selena Zito in the uh the uh the New York Post, actually, by way of the Pittsburgh Tribune review, great, great piece today, that echoes some sentiments that I was making about Trump's crowd, his supporters all the way back to last fall,
and it dovetails with the observation Robert Costa made in the Washington Post three weeks ago about the Trump base, possibly made up of a whole bunch of people who have never voted or haven't voted in a long time, and therefore are never polled.
And Robert Costa Washington Post saying this is the thing that concerns a lot of Democrats.
How many of those people are part of the Trump crowd, really excited, all jazz?
How many of them have not voted maybe ever or only a couple times may show up and vote?
There's no way to find out.
There's no way to poll them, because polls are likely voters, registered voters, and they're not found.
And then there's this before we go to the break very quickly, uh UK independent women are genetically programmed to have affairs.
Women are predisposed by their genetics to have affairs.
The affairs are backup plans.
In case the guy with whom they're in a relationship with turns out to be a dud, it's all about procreation.
It's all about life.
It's all about making sure that the species survives.
This is in women's genes, and they they have affairs as backup plans in case Prince Charming turns into Prince Adolfo.
Mr. Sturdley, anybody you want to test the theory on?
Now, lest anybody think that I'm being prurient here, let me just share it with you.
Women are predisposed by their genetics.
For those of you who are real in the means it's built in.
They are born with it.
Women are predisposed by their genetics to have it.
Means when they do it, you better not get mad at them because they actually they can't help it.
It's genetically programmed in there to have affairs as backup plans.
What do you what do you bet that this editor is a female?
What do you bet that whoever did the research is female?
And what do you bet they're in an unhappy relationship or have always been?
I mean, what would even spawn something like this?
Who would go looking in the genetic code to find programmed to have affairs?
And then the the conclusion, why?
Well, backup plans.
Women need backup plans if their relationships fail, according to a research paper.
And this research paper is from the University of Texas.
Scientists at the University of Texas say they are challenging the assumption that humans have evolved to have monogamous relationships.
The University of Texas research team has put forward the mate switching hypothesis.
That's what it's called, the mate switching hypothesis, which says that human beings have evolved to keep Testing their relationships and looking for better long-term options.
The senior author of the research actually has is a guy.
Well, that makes sense now that I think about it.
His name is Dr. David Buss.
And he sold uh told the Sunday Times of London that lifelong monogamy does not characterize the primary mating patterns of humans.
Breaking up with one partner and mating with another may more accurately characterize the common, maybe even the primary mating strategy of humans for our distant ancestors when disease, poor diet, and minimal health care meant that few people live past 30.
Looking for a more suitable partner was necessary.
So you see, it's all in there.
It's all in the genetic code.
It's all built in.
It must happen in order for the species to survive.
As I say...
Anybody you're thinking you want to test this theory on, you might now have it open.
Okay, then there's one more thing here in this story of the University of Texas.
It's actually in the uh UK independent about women being genetically uh genetically programmed to have affairs.
It also points out there's another measure that the researchers have, and that is that men with ring fingers longer than their index fingers are also predisposed to be promiscuous.
Those with uh ring fingers that are the same size are predisposed to monogamy.
And I imagine you're all measuring about now, so let me see.
Let's see.
Both of them have longer ring fingers than their indexes, so's mine.
I think this may be kind of uh flummery here, because I I I bet everybody's is.
I'll bet everybody's ring fingers longer than their index finger.
It may be part of the gin.
Well, you're woman.
We're talking here about men.
You're all your your your genes are already have you established as having an affair.
We're not talking about men.
And and whether they're predisposed to do it.
Okay, to the phones, we're gonna start here with uh with Brad in upstate New York.
It's great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Brad, are you there?
Brad in upstate New York testing one, two, three, three, two, one.
Are you there?
He is not there.
Doesn't matter.
He was only going to be a foil for what I actually wanted to talk about.
Subject line in his call took a he's not he oh he is there.
After I've said he was nothing more than a foil, he is there.
There you are, Brad, are you there?
I am, I'm gonna go.
Okay, okay, okay.
Well, you were there probably on a long we probably had a tech screw up in here that nobody knew until anyway.
So it says here that you were taking a long vacation through rural America.
What happened?
Uh instead of getting on the I-95, we took two lane roads all the way to Myrtle Beach, and we we it took us three days instead of twelve hours, but we saw Trump sign everywhere.
Now I listen to you religiously, my wife never does, but she listens to me.
Now wait, wait.
You where did you specifically see the Trump signs?
People's yards, a lot of the colours.
No, but what in cities in rural areas, where did you see them?
Uh rural towns, many rural towns.
So uh we went through Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, Delaware.
All on two two-lane roads except for the Chesapeake Bay.
And uh And let me ask you this.
Were you shocked?
I'm not.
I I I use that as proof.
I told my wife, I said, This is why Trump's gonna win.
This is where the basics.
If they get out of their house and go vote, these are the people who don't get cold, and that's why the media doesn't tell us.
Not only do they not get polled, they are routinely impugned and made fun of and uh and laughed at.
Yes, they're ignored.
And you're and ignored, exactly right.
So last night her phone rang, and uh she said, Who is this?
And they said it again, and she said, Yes, I'll answer your questions.
And it went on for 45 minutes, and it was a political poll.
And not only do I not know anybody in my 63 years who's ever been cold.
There it is.
My wife gets cold.
I wanted to yank the phone out of her hand and answer the questions myself, but I was so proud of her.
Well, who was it?
What What polling unit was it?
Do you remember I I don't know that, but they were tied to one of our local Republican senators, George Amador.
And uh they were asking Trump versus Hillary questions and Amador versus his opponent question.
Okay, so it was a New York well, yeah, okay, that that would make sense.
Well, look, it's the reason that I wanted to take your call and use you as a foil to transition to a uh another story here is I've got this column by Selena Zeto.
And the headline, stumped by Trump's success, take a drive outside U.S. cities.
If you don't understand Trump's success, if you're one of these people who doesn't get this, take a drive, leave the city, go outside the city and drive around and see what you see.
I remember making this point way all last fall in trying to explain to people who Trump's supporters were and what they found exciting about him, and what about what he was saying they supported.
Everybody was trying to figure it out last fall.
It didn't make sense to anybody in the establishment in the political circles of New York and Boston and Washington, it didn't make sense because to them, what Trump was saying should have disqualified him.
He should have been disqualified after he made his opening statement after getting off the escalator on June 16th.
And then he should have been disqualified after he said what he said about McCain.
And so all of these experts are pulling their hair out, trying to understand this.
And they're not getting even close.
And I spent all last fall and winter trying to explain it to them.
So this column by Selena Zeto, it buttresses exactly Brad what you saw.
Let me give you some highlights here.
If you drive anywhere in Pennsylvania from the turnpike to the old U.S. routes to the dirt roads connecting small towns like Hooversville with bigger small towns like Somerset, you might conclude that Donald Trump is ahead in Pennsylvania by double digits.
Large signs, small signs, homemade signs, signs that wrap around barns, signs that go from one end of a fence to another, dot the landscape.
And they dot the landscape with such frequency that if you were playing the old-fashioned road trip game of counting cows, you would hit 100 in just one small town like this one.
Meaning 100 Trump signs.
In Roughsdale, Pennsylvania, I'm pretty sure I saw more than 100 Trump signs, writes Selena Zeto.
She writes for the Pittsburgh Tribune review, by the way.
It's as if people here have not turned on the television to hear pundits drone on and on about how badly Trump is losing in Pennsylvania.
And it's not just visual.
In interview after interview, in all corners of the state, I found that Trump support across the ideological spectrum remains strong.
Democrats, Republicans, independents, people who've not voted in presidential elections for years.
And they have not wavered in their support.
Two components of these voters' answers and profiles remain consistent.
They are middle class, and they do not live in a big city.
They are suburban to rural, and they are not poor.
An element that I found fascinating until a Gallup survey last week confirmed that what I've gathered in interviews is more than just freakishly anecdotal.
Now, let me pause in this to point something out.
If you do pay attention to the drive-bys, if you watch the news, cable news, I don't care what network, I don't care what you watch or read, what you're going to hear from mainstream media types about Trump supporters is that they are almost all white.
They're almost all poor.
Many of them are unemployed, and they do not have any college education.
That's how Trump supporters are at present characterized.
And that is wrong.
That is not who there may be some in that group that are Trump supporters, but Trump supporters do have college education.
Some of them are highly intelligent, educated, some of them are doing quite well financially.
They're not all poor.
They're not all stupid.
In other words, the drive-by's want you to think that Trump's support base is deliverance.
And they're doing this on purpose.
So Selena Zeto travels around Pennsylvania and says, this is this does not dovetail at all.
And she says it's overwhelming.
And keep in mind, these are people who have not voted in presidential elections in years.
And don't forget Robert Costa in the Washington Post telling Charlie Rose how scared he is that these are the people make up the Trump base, and they're not polled because they're not likely voters, they're not registered voters because they haven't shown up to vote in a long time.
And so there, and there's 70% of the population that thinks that the country's headed in the wrong direction, and 50% of the population doesn't vote, and he's speculating that if these people show up in any significant numbers at all, it'll be a shock and total surprise, and it'll totally blow the polling out the window.
So Miss Zito here is claiming she's found this, but she's buttressing what she found.
This is anecdotal.
Her report, what she found, all the Trump signs, who the people put them out are, the supporters of Trump that she spoke to.
Nothing scientific about the way she gathered the information.
It's it's called anecdotal.
Then she came across a Gallup survey last week that confirmed what she found anecdotally.
And this Gallup survey is incredible.
The Gallup analysis that she came across is based on 87,000 interviews.
Now, it's not a presidential poll, because Gallup doesn't do presidential polls anymore because they haven't gotten close enough in recent polls, so they pulled out.
So they survey other things.
An 87,000 sample.
87,000 interviews over the past year.
Thank you.
And the analysis shows that while economic anxiety and Trump's appeal are intertwined, his supporters for the most part do not make less than average Americans.
And they are less likely to be unemployed.
Meaning the picture the drive-bys are painting of the average Trump supporter is all wrong.
And it's not just what she saw on her trip through Pennsylvania, but the Gallup survey confirms it.
Trump supporters, for the most part, make just as much or more as the average American.
Of course, you have throughout New York and Washington.
Those salaries are not normal because of the demographics and the makeup of those two cities.
The study from Gallup backs up what many of her interviews across Pennsylvania have found, and that is that these people supporting Trump are more concerned about their children and their grandchildren.
And boy do I, I don't care who I run into that's a Trump supporter.
In fact, I can add something to that.
No matter who I run into that doesn't like Hillary, you know, not everybody's a Trump supporter that doesn't like Hillary.
A lot of people don't like Hillary.
People that don't want the Democrats, the people that don't want Hillary, whether they're for Trump or somebody else, are concerned about their children and grandchildren because a country is headed in the wrong direction.
Now, while Trump supporters in Pennsylvania do happen to be overwhelmingly white, their support has little to do with race.
It has more to do with a perceived loss of power.
That's another thing the drive-bys are lying to us about.
They're painting the average Trump supporter as a white, poor, uneducated, racist bigot.
The Gallup survey of 87,000 people doesn't show this at all.
It shows people that are not concerned with race.
They're concerned with power and their loss of it.
And I will explain what that means right after this.
Hey, we're back.
Great to have your El Rush Ball behind the golden EIB microphone.
Okay, country class people as opposed to ruling class.
Selena Zito here in the Pittsburgh Tribune Review, when she says that the people that support Trump has nothing to do with race, has a lot to do with the perceived loss of power.
It's not power in the way of Washington or Wall Street, not power in the sense of boardrooms, but power in the sense that these people have and see a diminishing respect for them and their ways of life, their work ethic, and their tendency to not be mobile.
In other words, they these people.
Here's the truth of this, folks.
I think this really gets the nub of it.
Thirty years ago, people like this determined the country's standards.
In entertainment, in music, in food, in clothing, and politics, and personal values.
And then the blue laws went to hell.
And that opened the floodgates.
And this is not an exaggeration to say that people like Selena Gomez found these Trump supporters, they determined what the standards were in entertainment.
It was you didn't, you didn't say or express cuss words on TV because these people wouldn't watch if you did, and they would turn it off.
And they represented the majority of thinking in the country.
Politics, personal values, the whole thing.
They used to be the backbone of America.
In many regards.
Now the things they believe in are routinely laughed at.
The things they believe in are made fun of in movies, in books, in television shows.
They are mocked.
They are called racist and bigots.
And it is in this sense that they feel they are losing their power.
It's not so much power as it is respect and dignity.
The places where they live lack economic opportunities for the next generation.
They know that their children or grandchildren will never experience the comfortable situations they had growing up because all that's out the window now.
These Trump supporters are not the kind you find on Twitter saying dumb or racist things.
Many of them don't even have the time or the patience to engage in social media.
They are too busy working.
They're too busy living life in real time.
Call them the silent majority, the silent number, whatever.
And we're gonna find out in November just how many of them there are.
We're gonna find out in November how many of them show up and vote.
We're gonna find out a lot of things in November.
Because I guarantee you, these people are not being polled.
They're not being reached.
And in an even greater sense, the people responsible for polling and the editors and producers of major media networks, they're not interested in these people.
These people are passe.
These people are the bitter clingers now.
These people are the old-fashioned fuddy duddies who modernity has passed by.
And so nobody's interested in their the in their in their opinions.
Nobody cares what they think of the latest movie.
Nobody cares what they think of music today.
Nobody cares what they think of fashion.
They don't register to vote.
They haven't voted much for a whole bunch of uh reasons rooted disenfranchisement, so they are out there lurking, and every presidential year comes along and they stay home because it's more the same.
They don't have a political party.
The Tea Party maybe was a vessel for them.
But Trump has come along and has ignited them.
Trump has come along and re-energized them, and that's who they are.
And they are not the filthy swill and swine on Twitter.
They are not causing disruptions at rallies.
They're not malcontents and protesters starting fights at Hillary events or any of that.
They don't do any of that.
So we'll find out.
These are voters ineffectual or intellectually offended, watching Obamacare crumble, because they knew six years ago what it was.
They knew it was government overreach.
They never expected it to work.
Nobody listened to them when they told them that it wouldn't.
They're the same people who wonder why Obama hasn't decided to stop playing golf for just a day and go to Louisiana.
So it's a great piece.
We'll link to it at rushlimbaugh.com.
And uh I'm sure it'll be up there Coco here.
Well, it's Coco Jr. today, but Coco Jr.'s fast.
So it'll be up probably before I'm even through saying this.
Back in a second.
Okay, here you go, folks.
The head honcho of the European Union, Jean Claude Junker.
Sure he doesn't pronounce it that way, but I'm going to.
Says that borders are the worst invention ever.
Head honcho, European Union, Jean-Claude Junker.
Borders are the worst invention ever.
▲
Export Selection