All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 26, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:51
August 26, 2016, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Now now I'm confused.
I thought Beta 7, IOS 10 Beta 7 was the patch for that exploit that jail broke the phones that they patched in 9.3.5.
It could be that's what iOS 10 Beta 8 is.
It's small.
Anyway, we'll get to the bottom of it here, folks, when we move on.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Yes, sir, Rebob.
One big exciting busy broadcast hour remains.
Here on the Rush Limbaugh program at 800-282-2882.
Open line Friday means whatever you want to talk about.
Have at it.
Give me a tech question.
Give me the NFL.
You know, we've got week three of the preseason coming up.
This traditionally is the preseason game where the starters play the longest.
Traditionally the dress rehearsal for the regular season to start.
Some people poo-poo that.
That means fantasy football is right around the corner, going to be revved up.
There's going to be any number of things out there that you want to talk about.
Okay.
Okay, now I have a theory, and this could be all wet, but there's some things here that are really, really hard to nail down about this campaign.
I'm I'm also, I want to circle back to something that we led the program with today.
A uh column at the Huffing and Puffington Post by a man like Robert Rosenblum, who um, if I got the name wrong, it's the guy that ran Al Gore's network current TV before it was sold to Al Jazeera.
And he has a piece which I don't think is totally satire.
I mean, there's some tongue in cheek in it, obviously.
But his piece is designed to slap Democrats and leftists upside the head, say this election's over.
You people, you just you don't know it yet because you don't know how to judge the American electorate, but Trump's already won this thing and it isn't even going to be close.
And the polls are not catching it.
And his theory is that Americans have been watching so much television, and so much of television is now reality shows.
And by the way, he's right about this.
I mean, you've got the real housewives of practically every city in America now, and half of the real housewives aren't even married.
And then you've got Mama June, and whatever the hell that is.
And then you've got, I mean, the Bedford 8, the Stipheson 6.
I mean, everything's the Haney Project was a reality show.
I was on one.
Uh they're everywhere.
The Kardashians, whatever you, and this guy's theory is Americans are watching screens eight hours a day, TV five hours, their computers, smartphones, and tablets three hours, and they're watching this stuff.
And Duck Dynasty, which was the for a time for a couple of years, it was the most watched show on television.
Duck Dynasty.
And he makes the point, even the highbrow TV channels, the learning channel, and the discovery channel.
You used to actually be able to learn something on the learning channel.
And you used to actually be able to discover stuff on the Discovery Channel, but now it's just cheap, low rent, low information voter type TV shows, modern incarnations of the Hatfields versus the McCoys, the latest goings on in the Chop Shop.
Whatever the hell is happening out there, who has the nicest cribs in the gang community?
Is this all his point is that that's how America reacts to things now, and if anything in real life reminds them of a reality show, they glom onto it and love it.
His point is the presidential campaign has become a reality show primarily because of Trump.
Trump also, you know, the uh the effect the apprentice.
You're fired, all this stuff, a reality show.
Trump is great TV.
Trump is entertainment TV.
Trump is, and Hillary isn't.
Hillary is crap TV, his words.
Hillary is crap TV.
She's not entertaining.
She's not boring.
She's old and she's yesterday's.
His theory revolves around.
If his theory is right, then we have to be in the midst of an absolute decline in the American culture.
Now, how many of you think that we are?
A lot of people do.
We're in the midst of a decline where even the presidential campaign is not immune from the lowest common denominator in American culture.
Presidential campaign used to be way above it.
Demand excellence, demand competence, demand policy expertise.
You know it when you see it, even if you can't do it yourself.
You want people better than you are as president.
You want people much more qualified than you are.
His theory is that that's not the case anymore.
That whatever it is that attracts people to television is what's going to attract them to a candidate and a campaign.
And I, as I say, I think he's half serious with this.
He may even be more than half serious.
You read it snerdily.
What did you think?
Did you think the guy?
You think dead serious?
You don't think there's any satire in it.
Well, something's different.
Something is like a guy asked me about the polls.
If you go by the polls, it's over.
Hillary in a landslide.
Now I can point you to three national tracking polls.
UPI is one.
Uh PPD is another, and then the USC poll in the LA Times.
And in all three of those polls, Trump is either up one point or seven tenths of a point.
But Trump is up in all three of those dailies.
If you go into the battleground states in Florida, Trump is up too in the Florida Atlantic poll.
In the Monmouth poll, which is said to be the Bible of polls now.
The Monmouth College Monmouth University poll, whatever, said to be the gospel.
Trump is losing in double digits, and Hillary has cracked 50% nationally in that poll.
The polls are all over the place.
Dana Perino, I mentioned this to you last week.
Dana Perino, one day last week on the five on the Fox News Channel, told the audience that she was really pained to have to tell them what she was going to tell them, and that is the polls are right.
Do not make the mistake she says that she made in 2012, believing that Romney was actually up by five or six when the polls said the opposite.
She said that they were misreading it in 2012.
She said they had a wrong turnout sample.
She did not at all think that Romney was going to lose, but he did, and the polls with just a couple outliers being incorrect were right.
So she said last week on the five, please, I can't lie to you.
I can't sit here and give you hope when there isn't any.
I can't tell you to ignore the polls.
The polls are right, and it's not looking good, and Trump doesn't have much time to put it back together.
So you have that.
That would be a professional assessment.
You know, she was in the Bush administration.
Then you have the people saying, I can't possibly be right, Rush.
Look at those crowds out there.
And I know Trump's crowds are large, enthusiastic, vibrant, vim, vigor.
Hillary doesn't even do them.
Hillary doesn't even do events anymore because she doesn't draw anybody.
A big crowd for a Hillary event's 150 people.
And people say, yeah, right, Rush, so how in the world can she be at 50%?
There isn't any excitement for her.
Well, because the polls are working the way they always have.
And we don't know just how different this campaign is, if at all from previous campaigns.
We have to acknowledge it somewhat different.
Um how many years in the past, go back 2012.
Would Trump have gotten the nomination in 2012, do you think?
Would Trump have gotten the nomination in 2008 if he tried?
If Trump had tried to unseat George W. Bush in 2004, would he have succeeded?
How many of you believed the day Trump announced that it was last day of the campaign?
It comes down the escalator.
The Mexicans are rapists and murderers, and we're sending them back.
I remember my reaction.
I watched it, and I'm laughing myself silly here.
I'm thinking this is the funniest thing I have ever.
And then the polls came out, and we all know.
And then Trump kept saying things like that and kept growing.
Nobody, there's not a single expert anywhere who predicted that, other than L. Rushbo.
After a couple of weeks, I saw what was happening, I understood it, and I started advising people.
Nobody wanted to listen to me outside our tight-knit little group here.
And to this day, to this day, same people still think the Trump implosion that was supposed to happen last fall is now happen.
But something really weird, and I'm I'm telling you, I can't put my finger on all this.
That speech Hillary did yesterday, F. Chuck Todd comes out and says, Yeah, I can't believe there's not a single Republican that came out to defend Trump.
That's not unusual.
The Republicans don't defend other Republicans on charges of racism.
It just doesn't happen.
It's one of the frustrating things.
What's amazing, tell me if I'm wrong.
What's amazing is how many Republicans have piled on and agreed with her?
Have you seen any?
Did Paul Ryan find the nearest camera and echo what Hillary said?
Did Mitch McConnell?
Did Trey Gowdy?
Did Michael McCall?
Did Eric Cantor?
Did anybody?
Okay, well, where's that?
Where all the Republicans are going, yeah, yeah!
We've been telling you he's a racist pig.
Isn't that more interesting?
I know Eric Cantor tweeted something out.
He's happy Trump's flip-flopping on whatever he's flip-flopping on.
That's why I come his name is at the front of my mind.
Um why is Hillary's speech basically attacking and labeling Trump as a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe, degenerate, pervert, whatever.
Why is it dead news already?
If if if Hillary, I don't even want to give anybody the idea.
I'm just saying she could have made that speech about a lot of other people, and it would still be big news.
It'd be the biggest news.
There aren't a whole lot of Democrats piling on that either.
I mean, there but there was you see pockets of it, a little segment here, a little segment, but it's not the dominant story.
Hillary's allegations on Trump, racist.
I think, try this for a theory.
It's as good as anybody else's.
If you're in the Trump camp, and I say this sincerely, if you're in the Trump camp and you know what's going on, you want Hillary drawn out.
Because you know that Hillary doesn't do well when she's seen.
She doesn't do well when she's speaking.
She doesn't, the more Hillary's seen, the worse her numbers get.
This has been documented to be true throughout this century.
Hillary Clinton showing up, her numbers go down.
When she disappears and isn't speaking and isn't seen, her numbers either level off or even go up.
So if you're the Trump campaign, you want to draw her out.
You want her out there.
How do you do it?
You make an appeal for the black vote.
And what has Trump done?
He's gone out and he's made the last week, he's been just pounding the African American population with how rotten they're being treated, how taken advantage of they are taken for granted they are.
And what did it do?
It drew Hillary out.
So she came out, she makes this speech, dumping all over Trump as a racist, sexist, big and homophobe pervert freak, whatever she said.
We'll see what happens to her numbers after all this.
I'm telling you, it's this is no, no.
I'm not grasping on anything for hope.
There's not I'm I'm seriously sitting here analyzing this and trying to make the best and most sense of it I can.
And there are just a lot of things that are generating reactions that surprise me.
And there are other things I expect to be happening which aren't reactions that also surprise me.
What is the big thing that everybody's talking about?
Still, Trump's flip-flopping on immigration.
That's a bigger topic today on cable news than whether or not Trump is a racist, sexist bigot, whatever.
In fact, the way CNN's covering this is Trump Hillary trade barbs on racism.
What?
You mean the coverage isn't Hillary Clinton nails Donald Trump is the racist pig we all know he is.
No.
The coverage is Trump Hillary exchange barbs on racist allegations.
What?
You mean the Republican is being given some sort of, if not credibility.
You mean a Republican accusing Hillary of racism is actually getting covered?
Who would have ever thought that?
So I think we're in the middle of a bunch of fluidity that it's and it's headed in directions that nobody yet knows.
Because look, folks, by the measure of traditional common sense, Trump should have been finished, I don't know how many months ago, right?
And he's not.
I don't think he's even close to being finished.
The fact that they will not drop this immigration business instead of going after him as a racist.
I mean, that used to be the way you disqualify any Republican.
You establish that they're racist, and then you throw in that they hate women to war on women, and it kills them.
That's into them.
And yet the Democrats and media, and even some conservative media will not drop whatever they think Trump's saying, doing, wants to do on immigration and the so-called flip-flop.
I'm going to illustrate this.
We're going to take a break.
I'll come back with some phone calls in the next half hour.
We'll get the soundbikes to illustrate exactly what I'm talking about here.
Okay, back to the phones as promised on open line Friday.
Bruce in Denver, it's great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Thank you, Rush.
I think Mr. Trump could get ahead of this racism claim quickly and take it off the table for the entire campaign with the right set of ads and turn it to his advantage huge, as he would say.
What do you think what what kind of ads?
What should the ads contain?
Run clips of every Democrat presidential candidate for the last 40 years saying the same thing about their opponent, including if George Bush is elected, black churches will burn.
And then finish that up with Mr. Trump saying, look, folks, the Democrats and Hillary Clinton are afraid because they know I do what I say and I will bring jobs back to the inner city.
Well, let me offer a bit of a disagreement.
If you start re-running Democrat ads, black jerks burning, you're still running Democrat ads.
If that's if I heard you right, if you think they ought to get every ad and every Democrat presidential candidate said every allegation and run it, and then close it by saying Donald Trump wants to be in other words, you're gonna leave it up to the audience to assume that all that's a bunch of BS.
When really all you're doing is rerunning the ads, and guess who's gonna see them?
African Americans gonna be right reminded again of the allegation that blacks were dragged behind trucks when George Bush was governor of Texas.
You just I understand the desire everybody has to nuke the lies.
Everybody wants the Democrat lies to be blown to smithereens and they hang those lies around their necks, or better yet, bury those lies in the political coffins in which we're going to bury them.
But I don't think you do it by rerunning them.
Those things are emotionally based.
They worked because they connected emotionally with people.
And to run them again with a with the hope that people are going to finally realize what a bunch of lies they all were, it's a big risk.
I think there's you're on to something with Trump running ads, gonna have to start doing that.
The question is about what.
No, I did not mean to leave this group out.
There is also a group of people that think Trump is finished, and that the polls tell us that.
And that he's got no hope of coming back.
So you've got you've got all kinds of different possibilities out there.
People like I well, while I'm correcting myself, you know, I just opined that in a normal political cycle, Trump would have been finished, hopelessly gone months ago.
And I'm sure there are a lot of people.
He is rushed.
That's what you're not admitting.
Down ten points of polls rush when you get on a denial.
I know a lot of you think it's over.
But a lot of people don't.
A lot of people don't think the polls are capturing it, not for any reason other than it's...
Unlike anything we've seen in a while.
Even Dr. Crowdhammer yesterday had to admit we have scraped the bottom of the barrel.
We have we've gone as low as we can go in this campaign.
In Hillary, Trump, everything being said is just beneath this country like we have never been beneath it.
Which is on a par with what the guy in the Huffington Puffington Post says, which is the country has become a reality show.
And he who wants to run and lead the country had better act like the country is a reality show, and he's the star.
Now on to the issue of Trump and immigration.
Let me answer my own question.
My own question is why are the drive-bys not just hammering Trump as the racist bigot pig Hillary says he is?
Why have they dropped that?
Why are they focused so much on Trump's and his apparent flip-flop on immigration?
The answer is what are the drive-by's trying to?
What's their objective?
Their objective is to elect Hillary to defeat Trump.
So by focusing on his flip immigration, his number one issue in the drive-by community in the drive-by world, the only reason Trump ever had a prayer was his position on immigration.
And if they can destroy Trump on that, they think they can destroy his candidacy.
And that's why they're focusing on it.
As far as the drive-by is concerned, a Republican being accused of racism, that's so old.
It's not exciting anymore.
There's no future in that.
Been there done that.
We've already told everybody Trump's a racist.
We've already told everybody every Republican's a racist.
They're bored by it.
But with Trump flip-flopping in their minds on immigration, well, that's a golden opportunity to finally once and for all destroy his candidates.
Candidacy.
So that's why they're focusing on it.
And we start here with Kelly Ann Conway defending Trump on immigration on ABC Good Morning America today.
George Stephanopoulos says, look, we heard Trump last night say that he thinks Hillary is a bigot.
Do you think she's a bigot?
I think our policies have uh left many people behind.
And if we're going to look at the 70 percent of Americans who say that this country is headed in the wrong direction and they want change, then we can't possibly abide policies by really a political party and and Hillary Clinton.
Is she right to call him a bigot?
Have you seen what this man is called on a daily basis?
He's called a bigot or racist sex.
Why is this a one-way conversation?
Why is her team and her apologists almost everywhere allowed to just throw personal insults and get away with not having a press conference in 265 days?
Stephanopoulos then says, well, if if if they if if they stay, they're back to immigration here.
If they stay, will there be a path to legalization?
Or do they have to leave the country?
He has said no path to legalization, no path to citizenship, and no amnesty.
You can return home, and then if you'd like to go stand in line, like everybody else is the thing that we learn in kindergarten, stand in line, wait your turn, go through the normal courses, then that would be evaluated on a case by case basis.
So, and Trump, by the way, is saying what you'll hear at him on Anderson Cooper last night.
They gotta go back.
They gotta go back.
We're gonna find a drug dealer, gonna find a rapist, the purse snatchers, and the muggers.
We know who they are, we know where they are, we're gonna send them back.
They gotta come back.
The good people, we're gonna get the bad ones, gonna find the bad ones, gonna send them packet.
And if they want to come back, they gotta go through channels.
So Trump's essentially saying, well, yeah, we're we're we're gonna deport a bunch, and then if they want to come back, they can come back.
Now I know what the reaction this is gonna be.
Well, why go through the motion and sending them out?
I mean, how much money is that gonna cost?
Send them out, bring them back, you gotta find them.
Why not just legalize them?
No, they gotta go.
They gotta go.
I told everybody they gotta go, they gotta go.
They gotta go, they gotta come back, they're gonna stand in line, go to the same process, just like you did in kindergarten.
It's Kelly Ann Conway.
Poor Ann Coulter.
She's she she writes her latest book.
In Trump We Trust, E. Pluribus Awesome.
She was one of the early devotees of uh of Trump.
And immigration is why.
And almost the day her book comes out is when Trump makes people think that he's flip-flopping on it.
So she had a series of tweets expressing her frustration.
And she started joking that if Trump's really changing, uh, this may be a short book tour.
And the leftists, I'm telling you, they don't understand conservative or republican.
They don't understand real humor.
They it's it escapes them.
They actually thought she was promising to do a short book tour.
So they've been asking her, are you really going to short your book tour?
Are you really, if Trump changes his mind, and she's do you guys not get jokes?
Do you not understand jokes?
And I'm telling you, they don't.
But still, the timing of Trump's flip-flop, apparent flip-flop, with the arrival of her book, that had to be.
Oh my gosh, I can't.
So she's she doing the rounds, and she was on Hannity last night.
And we have two bites.
Here's the first.
Donald Trump came along and didn't need the donors, so he wasn't being bossed around by campaign consultants, though it sounds as if some campaign consultant has slipped into his campaign, and I don't think he should have been hiring, you know, Rubio's speechwriter for his interview with you, giving all these ridiculous talking points for amnesty.
And to speak to that, for one thing, um, the mainstream media, I've criticized Trump before.
I'm not some, you know, Clinton cultist or cruise cultist.
He's my guy, but I give him constructive criticism.
And every time I do this, the media makes this huge big deal of, you know, culture's hiring of Donald Trump.
It was a joke when I said this was gonna be the shortest book tour ever.
It's called a joke.
It's a joke, yeah.
She did say it, but they hope it's true, and so they're you're really gonna court short your book tour if Trump sells you out and so forth.
But she is clearly frustrated.
She she's uh of the opinion, let Trump be Trump.
You don't need speech writers, don't need consultants.
She did say that the day they hire their first consultant is the beginning of the end of the campaign.
Here's the next uh bite.
These are all the Marco Rubio cliches used to push the gang of eight bill.
And I think it's stupid because all Trump is doing is demoralizing his base, the never the people who hate him still hate him, but now they can call him a flip-flopper.
Way to go, whoever told Trump to say that.
He isn't a politician, he does get some things wrong.
The one thing that has been totally consistent in his life that I describe in this book is that he has always been super patriotic, has always put Americans first, has always cared about working class Americans.
And if you were putting Americans first, you are not going to want to keep even the most law abiding illegal alien.
Okay, so who is it, if anybody, advising Trump to soften or change his approach on this?
Well, Ann Coulter herself last night on ABC put forth the idea that it's Roger Ailes' fault.
That Ailes is advising Trump and that Ailes is a bushy, therefore a moderate, and that Ailes is advising Trump as he would advise a Bush.
Hey, you gotta soften a little bit.
That is turned out now to be refuted by others in the campaign, such as Rudy Giuliani, who is now claiming that it's Chris Christie who is causing Trump to change his language on this, as Katrina Pearson said the other day.
He's not changed his attitude, he's just changing the words.
Yeah, he still thinks thinks the same thing, and he's gonna do the same.
He's using different words to describe it.
So and of course the CNN's people start snickering and laughing, thinking, man, what an idiot changing the words.
So Giuliani says that it's uh it's Chris Christie, and that it's Chris Christie who is gonna continue to work on Trump to change, modify, moderate his position on uh immigration and deportation and amnesty.
We will hear from Trump himself when we get back.
Anderson Cooper 360 last night on CNN, Trump doubling down on the wall.
Question from Cooper, one of the big things you've talked about, primaries so forth.
We've had interviews about this.
You talked about the debates, 11 million undocumented immigrants, they have to go, you say.
The good ones can come back in.
They can put a door in the wall, and the good ones come back in, do it humanely.
It seems now there's been some contradictory statements about all of this.
We're gonna build a great wall.
The wall is going to be paid for by Mexico.
People are not gonna be able to tunnel because we're gonna have tunnel technology, we're gonna have all sorts of things on this wall.
There's gonna be a real wall.
Drugs will stop flowing into our nation and poisoning our youth and everybody else.
We're gonna have all sorts of e-verify and everything you can think of in terms of immigration.
People will not come in to our country illegally.
We're gonna fix that.
Cooper then says on Hannity last night, you used the word softening.
I've had people say it's a hardening, actually.
But 11 million who have not committed a crime, there's going to be a path to legalization.
Is that right?
You know it's a process.
You can't take 11 at one time and just say, boom, you're gone.
We have to find where these people are.
Most people don't even know where they are.
Nobody even knows if it's eleven.
So it's still 30 and it could be five.
Nobody knows.
Right, but we're gonna find them.
We don't know where they are.
It could be a five million, could be thirty million, could be eleven million.
I think it's more than eleven, by the way.
How did this number 11 even you know, this number used to be 14, and I've used I I've always thought this number's closer to 20.
And we're talking about since 1986 here.
You know, that's when we did Simpson Monsoli.
That's last time we granted amnesty and they promised that that would end everything, and it's just it's it's built from then.
No matter what the number is, the experts say, well, they're living in the shadows, you'll never be able to find them.
You can't find them.
What are you talking about?
Find them and can't.
You can't Eisenhower did it.
I mean, it's been done.
I mean, if you really wanted to do it, you could do it.
Uh but but Trump Trump here is saying it's a process.
You can't, you can't take all of them, however many it is.
Eleven million, five million, thirty million.
You can't take you can't get rid of all of them at once.
But we're gonna do it.
I like the tunnel technology.
I like that.
We're gonna have tunnel technology.
You know me, I'm a big tech guy.
Tech is my hobby.
How are we gonna how are we gonna do tunnel technology?
Why we're gonna have anti-tunnel technology that's gonna be part of the wall.
The wall will not allow tunnels.
You're not gonna be able to burrow under the tunnel, under the wall with a tunnel, which means the tunnel's got to be pretty deep.
The foundation is the foundation of the wall has to be deep.
If you're going to have anti-tunnel tech, then you've got to make sure that somebody can't build a tunnel underneath the wall.
That's what tunnel technology is.
If anybody knows about tunnel technology, Trump, I mean, it's a construction ace, right?
So if you're going to have tunnel technology, Cooper didn't ask him what it is.
I think Cooper said, well, I don't know half of what he's saying, so I don't know what to ask him about.
But the tunnel tech, I would have uh zeroed in.
What is tunnel tech?
I mean, how do you uh how do you how do you make sure that tunnels aren't going to work?
The only thing I can think of is you got to build a foundation of the wall really, really, really deep if you don't want a people come underneath it.
Because that's what a tunnel is, right?
Tunnels underneath something.
How many people do you think?
I'm just asking.
Like the Lincoln Tunnel in New York.
Or the uh battery park tunnel.
How many people do you think the tunnel actually is in the water?
I will bet you a lot of people think the tunnel is actually in the water rather than underneath the river bed.
So when you start talking tunnel tech, well, it opens it way, way up.
Here is this is the last bite we have with uh with Trump and Anderson Cooper last night.
There is no path to legalization.
Unless people leave the country, unless well, when they come back in, if they come back in, then they can start paying taxes.
So they still have to do that.
There is no path to legalization unless they leave the country and come back.
So that means of the 11 million who are here, even if they haven't committed a crime.
You don't know.
Again, you keep saying 11 million.
You don't know what the number is.
You know, millions of people that's the estimate.
And using the existing laws of our country, using the existing laws, millions of people are deported every year.
Right.
You know that, right?
Yeah, they are.
Obama is deporting people, there's no question.
It's just not very many, but there are deportations taking place.
So the the question that got this going was well, if they haven't committed a crime, will there be a path to legalization?
And Trump said, no, there is no path to legalization.
You know what I think is being set up here.
Remember when I many times in the in in the recent past, when people have come to me and said, you know, if you got behind this, you could make it happen.
If you would sign on to it, you could make it happen.
I said, Yeah, if I sign on to it, I can wave bye-bye to my career.
But I did have this proviso.
I said, I will be glad to sign on to Amnesty.
I will sign it right now.
If you put a provision in that those granted amnesty cannot vote for 25 years.
And let's see, or 10 years or 50, let's see how many Democrats support that.
Let's see how many people I have who want my assistance who would welcome it that way.
You want amnesty?
Fine.
You want path to citizenship.
Trump says there is no path to legalization other than obeying the law.
If you want amnesty, I wouldn't be surprised if this ends up being headed in that direction.
I'm not predicting it.
But I've always thought that was a great way to just expose everybody on this and what their real purposes are.
Back in a second.
I haven't mentioned it, but remember that hurricane, that storm that's supposed to be a hurricane might hit Miami.
Again, a nonentity.
But they first had it hitting Fort Waterdale, and then Miami, and now you can't find it.
It's just some thunderstorms out there that might skirt by Havana, which is a shame because we need the rain.
They want a hurricane so they can tout global warming.
▲
Export Selection