You know, folks, I I sit here, we report on and we talk about the Clintons a lot, and we joke about them.
And we laugh about them.
In addition to everything else that we do.
We criticize them, we shed light, shine light on them.
What they're doing here with this foundation is really unethical at the least, and it is really, really sleazy.
Readings, welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network again at 800-282-2882.
When you just stop and think about this, and I realize that people have a jaundiced view of politics.
And I realize people have a jaundice view of the establishment.
And I realize people fully understand what the establishment is and how the establishments in its completely different world than the rest of us.
They have connections, they have abilities, they have uh privileges, including flirting on the edges of the law that the rest of us don't have.
People are very much aware of that.
But there's, I think there's been a uh, as everything happens if it happens slowly, like the old story of the frog.
You put a frog in a pan with cold water, and you put it on the stove and you turn on the heater, and the frog starts boiling but doesn't realize it until it's too late.
It's so gradual.
You adjust the frog adjusts to the temperature as it warms up until the breaking point when it's too late.
And that's kind of the way all of this happens.
This sleaze has been going on for so long, and it started out small with nobody knowing about it, then we get little dribs and dabs of it here and there.
And by the time we find out just how dirty and filthy it is, we become kind of immune to it.
It's like cultural rot.
Thirty years ago you couldn't say certain words on TV.
The first time the words were uttered, people, that is outrageous.
Remember the wardrobe malfunction, the Super Bowl with uh what was it, Janice Jackson and Justin Timberlake, Janet Jackson.
There was the outrage over that.
Now that wouldn't even even raise an eyebrow.
These things.
So what used to be outrageous is the norm.
Daniel Patrick Moynihan had a name for it, defining deviancy down.
And what that means is that as things deteriorate and rot, you finally give up trying to fix them because it's futile, because they're worsening in the whole.
So you just give up, and what used to be illegal becomes non-criminal and then eventually legal.
And then eventually it just everything continues in the downward spiral.
That is the Clintons.
The Clintons have been on a perpetual downward spiral of corruption and ethical shenanigans for so long that a revelation like this, this is really in and of itself, just by itself.
In another era, this would have disqualified the Clintons and it would have shamed them.
And they would be out of public life.
But Bill Clinton didn't even suffer any shame over the Lewinsky scandal and being convicted of perjury before grand jury and grand jury testimony, losing his law license.
The whole thing, he's he's a he's a rock star in the Democrat Party.
Monica Lewinsky's life pretty much destroyed.
Uh the feminist groups in the Democrat Party who claim to exist to guard against that very thing, piled on and helped destroy Monica Lewinsky in order to protect Bill Clinton.
Now, the Clinton Global Initiative and all this charitable stuff, I'm convinced that some of it is to change perceptions of Clinton from the Lewinsky scandal and everything that's part of it, and you create the Clinton Global Initiative,
you time its annual meeting with the UN's annual meeting in New York in uh September and October, and then you come up with the Clinton Family Foundation and you totally turn yourself into good works, and it's meant to rebuild a reputation from the Lewinsky days, because obviously Clinton doesn't want that to be the last thing uh in the historical record on his life or his his legacy or any of that.
But even trying to turn it around, even trying to straighten out the Clintons can't do anything but go lower.
They create the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Family Foundation, and it becomes it's a slush fund.
They get they get filthy rich in curious ways that appear to be on the edge of ethical.
And now Hillary is Secretary of State is selling access.
You take this incident by itself, and you transplant it into another era in this country, and they are finished.
This is a big deal.
But it isn't reported as a big deal.
For all the obvious reasons the media wants her elected, the media is going to protect her, the media is going to do whatever they can to shield her and cast this as something nothing to say here, no big deal.
It's just politics as usual.
She's not the first.
Whatever excuses they come up with.
But folks, it's disqualifying.
Here is a woman selling access to the United States Department of State.
To donors.
People donating to her personally.
They're not even giving to the United States.
They're giving to her.
They're giving to her foundation to her husband.
And they're giving major amounts of money.
$32 million here, $100 million there.
Some of these shenanigans involve the United States uranium supply ending up being transferred into the hands of people in uh uh where is it?
Kazakhstan.
The Clintons also have uh underneath the table arrangement with one of the lead criminal oligarchs in Ukraine as a result of this foundation business.
I mean, it's it's it's it's just filthy.
It is in a in a sane world, it's it's totally unacceptable.
Whether you can prove criminality or not, this is one of those things where the perception of impropriety is so egregious, so obvious, so outrageous that people would be running away from it.
They wouldn't want to be tied to it, they wouldn't want to be linked to it, they wouldn't want to have any association with it for fear of being tainted by it.
And yet, no such things happen.
Now there is one, and it's only one something of that sort that's happened.
It's kind of surprising to me.
USA Today has an editorial closed down the Clinton Foundation.
USA Today is calling for the Clinton Foundation to shut down and to transfer its charitable work to other groups.
And here's what they say.
The only way to eliminate the odor surrounding the foundation is to wind it down and put it in mothballs starting today and transfer its important charitable work to another large American charity like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation or some such thing.
If Hillary Clinton doesn't support these steps, she boosts Trump's farcical presidential campaign.
And if she's elected, she opens herself up to the same kind of pay-to-play charges that she was subject to as Secretary of State.
Now listen to their reasoning for this.
They're not asking her to shut it down because it's wrong.
They're not asking her to shut it down because it's sleazy and unethical.
They're not asking her to shut this down for any reason other than if she keeps this up, she's gonna help Trump.
Now we can't have that because Trump is a farce.
And if she keeps this up and if she's elected, she's gonna continue to open herself up to the same kind of pay-to-play charges she was subject to as secretary.
Well, how much did that hurt her?
None of this stuff has hurt her.
And that's what the Clintons know.
None of this is gonna harm them.
They're gonna get rich and they're gonna get richer.
And their rich donors are gonna keep donating, and their rich donors are gonna keep throwing parties and they're gonna keep throwing fundraisers, and all the friends are gonna remain friends.
There's nothing that's gonna happen.
The worst thing that can happen is this.
If Hillary Clinton loses the presidency, there is literally no reason for that foundation to stay open.
I'm not kidding.
If she isn't elected president, you think they're going to continue to get donations of $30 million, $10 million, $1 million.
There won't be any reason to give that foundation any money if she's not elected president.
If she's not elected president, she's not going to be appointed something in Trump's campaign, we don't think.
Stop and think of it that way.
Everybody says, oh, the charity, man, it does such great work.
Yeah, well, it won't survive if she doesn't win the presidency.
What does that tell you about what it is?
Hey, hey, Lim, you forget something.
You're forgetting Chelsea.
I'm not forgetting her, Mr. President.
I think she's got a prayer being elected president, and you're not going to have people give you 30 million dollars on the come she's going to be elected president in 10 or 15 years.
It isn't going to happen.
This is just, it is, it is sleaze beyond the pale.
Slees doesn't even describe what this is.
But you know, even I, and I'm guilty of this.
We all laugh about it, we chuckle about it.
It's the Clintons, and it's just, it's more of the same.
It's just worse than what they've done prior.
But there isn't any itinerant or accompanying outrage by any of the people who are uncovered.
Even the AP in uncovering the story, they don't really have a whole lot bad to say about it.
They just are reporting the facts, which that's more than we can expect from this bunch.
And of course, USA Today shut it down, but that's only because it helps Trump.
Not because it's wrong, not because it's sleazy, not because it's not even democratic.
This is beyond the pale.
Now, before we end this segment, I want to circle back here.
Michael Goodwin, columnist at the New York Post.
The only question left for Hillary is what else are you hiding?
He is of the opinion.
Everything we know about this doesn't explain why it's happening.
And let me run through the reasons, okay?
Some people might say that they want to get rich, even Even I have said that there'll never be enough money for the Clintons ever since they got into politics.
Well, ever since they went to Yale, they have been surrounded by real wealth.
I mean blue blood wealth.
I mean the kind of money that they have never even only dreamed of.
And it's tough when that's your circle of friends, and you don't have it.
So they've had this quest to get rich and to do it as quickly as they can ever since they got married and went to Arkansas.
It's been what their primary existence has been is to get rich, to leverage everything they accomplish toward getting big money.
And never will they ever have enough is the theory.
And that's why they're continuing to do this.
Goodwin says the easy answers about why she did what she did.
I mean, all this stuff puts her at risk, the private email server, which she had to know was going to be discovered.
This, this accepting donations in exchange for policy preferences for donors, pay for play, pay and play.
This is why risk your presidential aspirations this way.
And the answer to that question is what everybody searched.
There's got to be something more that we don't understand.
The easy answers about why she did all of this are too obvious.
Wanted to get rich, didn't anybody didn't want anybody to know her business.
Throw in her chronic paranoia, her chronic sense of entitlement, and she and Bill had a rationale for thinking they were above the law.
They had escaped his appeachment Trial.
So they believe they had lifetime immunity.
And I believe they think they do.
But it's impossible to believe it.
That's all there is in terms of explaining why they are doing this.
Goodwin writes there has to be more.
Probably something so big and awful it would destroy her if it is discovered.
The added riches they collected through what uh Goodman says, I believe are corrupt actions were not necessary.
They were getting legitimately rich on his and her book contracts and speeches.
What difference would another donation make to the foundation?
It was already swimming in more money than it could spend.
And because none of this adds up to a coherent explanation, Goodwin says, I believe we are still in the dark about a hidden bombshell.
There must be a secret unholy grail that explains the self-destructive behavior that all of this is the stonewalling, the lying.
But he says he's not going to speculate what it is because his imagination is too limited and is no match for what the Clintons can imagine.
They pioneered new ways of selling access, Lincoln Bedroom and so forth.
I thought I found the question intriguing.
Because even if you think the Clintons do think they're immune and they've got the press in their back pocket, and they think they can get away with any scandal whatsoever, they're still seeing when she starts all this, when Bill and Hillary start all this foundation stuff, Clinton Global Initiative, selling access as Secretary of State, then selling access on the come as president.
They can't possibly know four years ago that the Republicans are going to nominate Donald Trump.
They have got to figure the Republicans are going to nominate somebody they consider formidable.
Maybe they don't.
Maybe they think the Republicans are such patsies that the Republicans aren't going to pursue anything discovered that the Clintons do.
But clearly they put a lot of their aspirations at risk engaging in this wanton unethical behavior.
With now USA Today demanding that they uh they shut it down.
Question remains, why?
Okay, I got to take a break and we come back on a return to uh to the phones.
They've got a great roster of people waiting here.
We'll get to it right after this.
It's L. Rushbaugh, as usual, half my brain tied behind my back.
Just so everybody knows it's fair.
And we go to St. Louis.
Richard, you're next.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
What an honor it is to finally talk to you after all these years.
Thank you, sir.
Bert.
What part of St. Louis do you live in?
Uh Dogtown.
Downtown St. Louis.
Cool.
Okay.
Mansion House.
Say that one more time.
Mansion House.
Mansion House, I've been there.
Um, don't go there too much.
Old lady doesn't want me get too far from home.
But I just think that's a good thing.
But you're right.
But you're nearby, nevertheless.
Yeah, and I've been to Cape, and I hear the commercials that you do for your guy down here are familiar with the area.
It's a good area, it really is.
You've been well, thank you, Brian.
I appreciate that.
Hey, I need to tell you, really, in all sincerity, that even though I am a liberal and I am 100% a liberal, and I have listened to you for so many years.
I think that people should understand, especially your base, that people like me actually get something from your program.
While I rarely agree with your in conclusions, I always follow your logic 100% of the time.
And you've got me to self-reevaluate before and even change my position in the in the past.
So when I'm listening to you, I'm not trying to think of how I can find fault in what you're saying or to one-up you.
I'm literally listening because you give me information that I'm not going to hear on the networks, especially about the players and the relationships between the players.
So I appreciate you for literally what it is.
And it it doesn't hurt that you have a little subtle humor every now and then.
I just wanted to let you know I may be a liberal, but I really do get something from your show.
Well, that's that's yeah, it's fascinating.
I I I appreciate that.
Part of what you've said was that as you listen to me, you learn things you didn't know, particularly about players, and at the end of the day, it cements your liberalism.
I'm not persuading I'm not persuading you.
You're becoming an even more solid liberal after listening to me and enjoying it.
Oh, for the most part, that's a hundred percent true.
But listen, a month ago you had me worried to the point I had to go on Wikipedia and look up Republican core values just to make sure you hadn't converted me without me knowing it.
Well, that makes me feel a little bit better.
I have not first time I have been told that I am I'm actually helping people cement them uh themselves in their liberalism.
Well, you really do, and and I'll tell you, here's where we found common ground.
I am a veteran as well, and I want you to to understand, and I'm sure you do already that once you get outside of Crystal City, this lady has no support in the military at all.
And I really think Trump should expose that more.
He already runs the narrative of crooked Hillary.
We need to expose more things like you're talking about the foundation, no doubt.
You can't have that in the capacity she has and not be corrupt.
And and I should also go on and tell you that I look back, well, I used to look back on Clinton's years as president as fondly as Republicans today look back at Ronnie.
And I understand that.
But I took look at I got a break coming up.
I'm can you hang on for a couple of minutes here until we get the next break.
Yeah, because I c I totally understand why you would just love the Clinton years as a liberal.
And we are back with Richard in the St. Louis, who uh has acknowledged that he is a full-fledged thoroughbred liberal, one hundred percent, who nevertheless enjoys the program.
You were when we uh sadly you were telling me that you think back of the Clinton years the way we think of uh the Reagan years.
Right.
I'm I'm aware that back in the day the guy wasn't thought too fondly of by his own party, but as the years went by, that kind of change and listen.
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Who who wasn't thought fondly of by his own party back in the day?
I don't think the Republicans really gave him the respect he deserved, uh much in the same way that Obama gets it from both sides as well.
And and listen, the reason I think that is because he always had to fall back on his wit.
You do you remember the time he was walking away out of the back garden, some reporter says something like Mr. President, what about the Jackson charges?
What do you think about those?
And he just turned around and he said, Well, I think he ought to pay him.
And then he walked away.
It's like the guy knew how to handle folks, but I don't think he was appreciated until we had several presidents that could not even perform up to his standard, and then we knew what we had in him.
Okay, well, I I'm a little disagreeable.
I think during Reagan's eight years, the people that voted for him loved him intensely and appreciated him throughout and even after he left.
I was gonna say that the reason you like Clinton, correct me if I'm wrong, uh I don't think it's so much rooted in policy.
I don't think it's rooted in whatever uh Clinton is perceived to have done to make life better uh in America, make the country better.
I think Clinton was respected, loved, and adored because he made mincemeat out of us.
I think the left and Democrats loved Bill Clinton because he beat us so easily.
I think that's to this day.
Why he is respected, admired, and uh and liked.
It could very well be, and I will tell you that has changed for me, unfortunately, and I don't like that fact, but I will tell you why, and this is where Hillary plays into all this.
Let's think about this for a second on this Benghazi appearance.
Now, as a veteran, I was very interested in her making that appearance because I had talked to other service members, former service members, current service members.
We all needed to know essentially, for our own knowledge, how we could have been part of the most advanced military in the world, had the leeway we had to respond to the situation, and yet we lost an ambassador and a security detail.
We all know without even digging into it, something somebody dropped the ball.
So as I think back on that situation, I remember Clinton and how he appeared before Congress.
And you know what she did?
She took a book uh page out of his playbook and she simply tweaked it.
She said where you dropped the ball, Bill was you lied, and that's how they got you.
Not for what you did, but for the lie, just like you said earlier.
So she tweaked it.
She went in there defiant.
I'm not telling you guys nothing.
I'll I'll talk about how we can prevent it, but not as to what caused it.
And she didn't lie, and therefore it's two years later, no one really knows any more than what they did then.
So she smartened up.
She used her wit.
She I hate to use the word crooked.
I'm not a Trump supporter, but I'm not a detractor.
And I do believe 100% she's as corrupt as she can be.
Are you gonna vote for her?
Are you gonna vote for her?
No, I will not.
I will not vote for it, and I can't see how any veteran in their good conscience could support that.
What are you gonna do then?
You're not gonna you said you're not gonna vote for Trump.
So who is it?
Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, who you're gonna vote for?
I'm really in a conundrum because I am always told by my friends, well, if you don't vote, you're voting for the other guy.
I don't know if I necessarily buy into that, but uh I think it is my civic duty to vote.
It's just what do you do when your options are all disappointing?
Yeah, I I uh I actually think that attitude might be common among more people in this election cycle than we know.
Um I wouldn't presume uh to tell you what to do.
I'd uh but I I can't relate to it.
Uh I am in a where where I don't care what else, it's not gonna be her.
And I think most Trump people.
Here is my evidence for this.
And by the way, uh Richard, thank you again for the call.
I really appreciate it.
And and your uh you're really, really mature and kind way.
This is the first liberals called here has not resorted to name calling in 30 seconds.
See, we can have civil discussions with liberals on this program.
He was a great guy.
Okay, so Trump is apparently softening his position on immigration.
That's what the drive-by's are saying.
Trump is now saying, Well, I don't know about deportation.
Well, we're gonna talk about it.
Well, some of these are really good people.
Well, and the drive-bys are just ecstatic because they think Trump is totally reversing himself, and they think Trump is totally reversing himself on his number one issue.
The only reason he has support, they think he's committing suicide.
So the drive-by's went out, and they started doing man on the street interviews with Trumpists.
And they wanted to know how do you feel now that Donald Trump has sold you out?
How do you feel that Trump is maybe not gonna build a wall, that Trump maybe is not going to deport all.
And they're not finding anybody mad at him.
They're mad about that.
What they're finding, or Trump is saying, Well, you know, it's not the primaries, it's the general, gotta make some modifications, gotta do some changes here, gotta reach out to a little bit more people.
Totally understandable.
He might have to modify his position.
And then the drive-by-you don't you don't think he lied to you then?
You don't think no, no, not at all.
He's doing what he has to do to get what he wants accomplished accomplished.
In other words, Trump's supporters are not leaving him over this.
At least here in the early stages of analysis.
The drive-bys thought for certain that they would.
You could see it the minute this story broke, the minute Trump said what he said that caused all this.
You could just see the drive-by's salivating him.
You can see the saliva literally dripping from the corners of their mouths down to the floor, and they were so excited.
They thought there was gonna be a mass protest against Trump.
They thought that Trumpists nationwide were gonna rise up and abandon Trump and start getting mad and say, see, we can't trust anybody.
And it didn't happen.
And it didn't happen because they don't understand the connection that Trump supporters have for him.
And they and and there are many elements to that connection.
And I'm gonna tell you what one of them Is.
And if there are any of you with the drive-bys listening now who really want to learn and really want to understand, I mean really want to know.
I'm going to give you a hint.
I don't know what percentage of Trump supporters this applies to, but I know it's big.
Are you ready?
They, I'm going to say it very slowly, so that it has maximum impact.
Trump supporters don't care what he does or what he says.
Because there is no way they are going to do anything that helps elect Hillary Clinton.
It's no more complicated than that.
There are many other reasons why Trump's supporters support him, and I don't know what percentage of the Trump support base represented by what I just said, but it's a sizable number of Trump supporters.
You drive buyers are looking for mass defections.
You're looking for people to be disappointed.
You're looking at people to think that Trump has sold them out, lied to them.
You're waiting for them to, in effect, come to Jesus and realize that they've been snookered from day one by Trump.
You're not going to find it.
Because this has been bigger than Trump.
It's about more than Trump since this movement that's there, however big it is, existed before Trump came along.
Trump happens to be the guy, whether by accident or by design, who connected with this movement.
Again, unknown how big it is.
There are many reasons why Trump supporters support Trump.
There are many reasons why Trump supporters are loyal.
There are many reasons why people are going to vote for Trump and are excited.
There's a lot of reasons why Trump draws huge crowds with lots of energy.
One of the reasons why some of those people will never abandon Trump is because they will never they're not going to do anything that in their minds would help Hillary Clinton get elected.
And this is something the drive-bys can't understand.
Because they love Hillary.
I mean, they're Democrats.
They're leftists like she is.
They think she's due to be coronated.
They're going to treat her like a queen if she is elected.
And they can't understand other people not seeing this.
So the only way they can chalk it up is you people that don't see Hillary for what you're just biased, you're sexists, your bigots, your chauvinists, your numbskulls, your idiots.
And the proof to them will be that even when Trump sells you out, in their opinion, you will not abandon.
So there's something wrong with you.
And they will never understand.
I don't think just how fervent, just how solid the no-way Hillary Clinton as president group of people is that's supporting Trump.
maybe even some of the libertarians that are supporting other people too.
Hillary Clinton is the worst Democrat candidate that party has ever nominated.
All this talk about Trump being the worst presidential candidate any party is ever nominated, maybe, but Hillary Clinton's a close second, and she is the worst candidate the Democrat Party has ever nominated.
She is a walking disaster waiting to happen in I don't know how many ways.
And believe me, like our guy from St. Louis, there are a lot of people out there looking at all of this and saying, is this the best we've got?
And you might start asking yourself, well, it may not be the best we have, but it may be a reflection of what we've become.
I mean, these two did win, after all.
Take a brief time out here, my friends.
We'll be back with more in just a moment.
Back to the phones.
Who's next?
This is Rob in Colorado Springs.
It's great to have you on the program, sir.
Hi.
Rush, it is an honor to talk with you as always.
Thank you, sir.
Appreciate that.
Um, I am a rush raid millennial.
Uh I'm also a technology officiado like yourself and a big Apple fan.
Well, cool.
I want you to know that there is a large chunk of your audience who love when you talk about technology and tech blogs and everything like that.
And I'm here to suggest that I think you should spend either an entire show or maybe start creating a podcast where that's all you talk about.
Because it's great to hear an insightful conservative voice, which obviously we don't get from the tech blogs that we read right now.
No, that's true.
the tech blogs are mostly young millennial leftists who are scared to death the planets.
It's very informative.
You have some really keen insights, and it's just too bad that we only get to hear you talk about it every once in a while.
Well, you know, you I I you know I really appreciate you you saying this.
Um how long have you been listening to the program?
I have been listening to the program since I was 18 years old.
I'm now 30.
So 12 years.
Oh, well, then you might have have have uh heard me talk about this.
But going way back to year four, year five of this program in 1992, 93, if I deviated from discussing whatever the news of the day was, say to talk about the NFL or to talk about golf, I was inundated with complaints from my audience, and the theme was stick to the issues.
We don't care about football.
We don't care about golf.
We don't care.
And every time it's still to this day when I deviate from the issues of the day, I hear from the well, I call them a stick to the issues crowd.
So when I when I when I deviate, now go and go tech.
There's particularly there's a there's a contingent of people that think I ought to hate Apple just for political reasons, and they think I'm selling out by discussing Apple in a positive way and tech in general.
I would love to spend more time talking about.
In fact, we're working, I can't give away too much right now, but we're working here on a website redesign.
And I hope that that that this happens relatively soon because one of the things I want to do with it is have an entire section of it devoted just to tech and my thoughts, passions and things, whatever day-to-day that interest me, that's where I'll do it.
And that makes it elective.
The audience can go there and check what they want.
And it will it will consist of many different things.
But the the whole subject uh fascinates my hobby.
It's it's uh it's where I go to get away from uh the quote unquote news of the day.
So I am very happy to hear that it interests you and that it and that you don't mind listening to it.
And I think that you've built a base of millennials and people who are younger of me, because you delve into that category and don't just talk about politics and everything else that's going on.
Because even if they draw the wrong conclusions and they're skulls full of mush because they read all these tech blogs, you do provide something that they're interested in, and that includes the technology and the way we use it today.
And it's only gonna grow.
It's only going to get more incredible.
It's uh you know, I I'll tell you, I'll tell you something, Rob.
My whole life, I have always said I don't mind getting older.
When I was fifteen, I wanted to be eighteen, eighteen, I wanted to be twenty-one, twenty-one wanted to be twenty-five, twenty-five wanted to be thirty.
Because the way I looked at it, people older than me, no matter what age I was, seemed happier, more productive, better off.
I wanted that.
I wanted to be independent, self-reliant, and uh and and that hasn't changed.
There's one thing now that remake that is making me regret getting older.
Tech.
I'm I'm starting to think of all the things I'm gonna miss.
It's just it I I'm I'm fascinated by it.
I am I'm intrigued by it, and it is advancing so rapidly uh that I just I wonder what it's gonna be in 15 or 20 years.
You know, it's g it's it's it's it's unimaginable to us now.
Uh where we are now with some of this stuff is unimaginable fifteen years ago or ten, uh, other than to the innovators and the inventors who made it all happen.
But it's uh it's the only thing.
The only thing that has made me not regret, I don't regret anything.
It's the only thing that makes me, I don't know, disappointed about getting older.
You know, so I I I quietly, so you talk Apple.
Let's say Apple has a 10-year plan for the iPhone.
Would you make it a three-year plan?
Just to make sure that I see it.
You know, that's that's my attitude.
And don't read anything into the number of years.
I'm just using those as a uh descriptive technique.
I appreciate the call.
I really do, Rob.
We'll be back after this with much more.
Don't go away.
Just in from the hill.com.
There's a new poll that shows Donald Trump up in Florida.
Now, if you've been paying attention, Trump is supposedly getting shellacked in all these battleground states.
So shellacked that Hillary may not even campaign in some of them.
But there's a new Florida Atlantic University survey released just this afternoon that shows that Trump is now leading Hillary 43 to 41.
That's a margin of error lead, but it's still a lead.
It's the first poll showing Trump leading Clinton in Florida since early July.
And you've heard that these polls are tightening, and they are.