All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 16, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:52
August 16, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 podcast.
All right, so it all makes sense.
Trump gives his vaunted anticipated major address yesterday, foreign policy, ISIS, this kind of stuff.
You never know it, but Trump's speech contained a whole bunch of profundities.
Trump's speech contained some amazing things, but you're not hearing about that.
All you're hearing about it was typical Trump bigotry, typical Trump ignorance, typical Trump demonstrating he's unfit and unqualified for the for the office.
Just typical coverage of the drive-by's.
And then after that, they're ignoring it.
And they're ignoring it because this is things in there in Trump's speech that I'm convinced that they do not want certain people to know that he said.
And I will splain what I'm talking about as the program gets underway, because that's what the program's for, is for me to explain to you what's going on, what I think about it.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, if you want to join us.
If you want to send an email, I scan them, occasionally select one to reference.
It's L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
Let's go straight to Newt Gingrich.
And his reaction last night on the Fox News channel to uh Trump's foreign policy speech yesterday.
This is what the newster, Mr. Newt, had to say.
This in some ways is the most important foreign policy speech since Ronald Reagan.
The contrast between what Donald Trump did and what Hillary Clinton is couldn't be clearer.
This is a Grand Canyon-wide chasm of two totally different worldviews.
This was truly a historic speech.
And I'm interested to see if the mainstream media can actually focus on the speech.
Not gonna happen.
That was last night.
Trump's speech was yesterday afternoon.
We're coming up on 24 hours since Trump gave the speech, and there's not a peep.
There's not a single peep in the drive-by media anywhere close to what Newt's talking about.
You hear what Newt just said here?
He said in some ways it's the most important foreign policy speech is Ronald Reagan.
Now, we all know that Newt is given to hyperbole.
And I knew, but that's that's Newt.
We also know that Newt is a is a Trumpist.
But at the same time, you know, Newt has had plenty of criticism of Trump.
He's had plenty of uh constructively negative things to say about Trump.
So he's not one of these sycophants that's all in and defends Trump no matter what.
And I I tend to think that the Trump speech happened yesterday while this program was on the air.
And it's not possible for me to get into something in detailed fashion while the program is underway.
All I can do is, you know, we may be roll some sound bites from it, but I mean, my awareness and knowledge is strictly surface in that circumstance.
It wasn't until yesterday afternoon or last night that I was able to get into this, and I saw some things that to me were profound.
Uh and they and they they might be to you too, but nobody's gonna know it.
So I'm not telling you this to say, hey, folks, this could be the turnaround.
I'm not that's not my point.
The point is what Trump said versus what Hillary Clinton has said she wants to do.
It's a 180.
It's a total reversal of what the two parties are reputed to stand for.
Let me just rather than tease you here, let me tell you what Trump said he's gonna do.
You've heard that the drive-by's, I'm sure you've heard this, that Trump, what a bigot!
God, what a racist.
God, what a what a what a good discriminates against everybody.
Trump said, that we're gonna vet these people.
And we're gonna find out why they're coming here.
And we're and we're gonna institute requirements.
They gotta come here essentially.
They gotta love America, they gotta want to become part of America, and we're gonna find out what biases they have, and if they have any desire to come here and kill Americans, they're not getting in.
And the drive-by said, well, he's obviously biased towards Muslims.
Why would they think that?
Why would they think when Trump says, and if you have designs on coming into this country and killing Americans, you're not getting in, and the drive-by reaction is, see, he hates Muslims.
Why would they think that he's talking about Muslims?
Why would they think that at all?
Who's got the bias here?
Well, anyway.
Mrs. Clinton, on one hand, has said that she wants to be actually, I think it's Trump's term, Angela Merkel.
She wants 500,000 Syrian refugees and Islamic immigrants so forth in the country every year, right?
Some number like it.
It's a pretty large number, 500,000.
Donald Trump says, uh, no way we're going to vet these people and we're going to put them under tight examination.
And if we find that they are coming here to rabble rouse to make trouble, if we find they hate Americans and want to want to inflict harm, we're not going to let them in.
Now, who is it that lesbians and gays and women consider to be their defenders and the number one protectors?
It would be the Democrat Party.
Gays and lesbians, the LGBTQ community, along with practically every other minority group believes that the Republican Party's out to get them.
And that their savior, their protectors, their defenders.
The people looking out for them happen to be the Democrat Party, and whoever is running for president.
So in this situation, it's Hillary Clinton.
Who does Hillary Clinton want to let into this country just because?
Just because they are Islamists, just because they're Syrian or just because.
She wants to let into this country people who, as part of their religion, must discriminate against gays and lesbians.
We know how Islam regards women, and we know how Islam regards homosexuality.
What candidate in a foreign policy speech yesterday made it clear he doesn't want those people in the country.
And what candidate has just put up the green lights and come on in.
Hillary Clinton.
The Democrat candidate, the Democrat nominee for president, representative of the Democrat Party, openly willingly wants to admit people to the country who have not very pleasant thoughts and ideas about women and homosexuals.
And over here, the Republican candidate, Donald Trump, is the guy who doesn't want those people to come in by virtue of his speech yesterday.
So we've got a reversal here of 180 proportion.
We have the Republican candidate for president, essentially, suggesting that if you want to come into this country and attack Americans because of their gender or because of their sexual orientation, if you want to come to America and you have a problem with sexual orientation or with women or any other minority group, we're not going to let you in.
The Republican and naturally the Republicans being called a bigot.
The Republicans being accused of discrimination, and it's the Democrat who's letting sworn enemies of various of their constituents' groups into the country.
This is why I think the drive-bys are not going into much detail talking about this speech.
And there's no other way to analyze this.
Now, the one thing that you have to accept here is that the religion of Islam is what it is regarding women and homosexuals.
Now we know that in Saudi Arabia, which is for lack of better word, the headquarters of modern Islam.
Yeah, infidels as well.
We know what Islam says about non-believers.
We know what Islam says about women because we see how women are treated.
But we just got watched this.
Incredible, I heard about it yesterday.
I just watched it.
The drive-by media making the biggest deal out of the fact the first woman to wear a burqa won a medal in the Olympics.
What does that tell you?
The first woman to wear a burqa.
Well, we have here quite openly what Islam thinks of women by virtue of the way they're treated, the way they're forced to dress, the way they can't drive, the penalties that they veer from the rules and tenets.
Same thing.
We know that homosexuals are beheaded in places like Iran and Saudi Arabia if they're discovered to be homosexuals.
Now some people may not want to believe that.
There may be some devoted Democrat voters who's simply not going to accept that.
They may not know that that's part and parcel of the religion, and when they're told they might not want to accept it because they won't, they won't be able to understand a Democrat candidate openly welcoming people like that into the country.
You remember when Mahmood Ahmedini Zad was running Iran.
He came to the United Nations one year in October, the annual General Assembly meeting, and they invited him to address the student body at Columbia in New York.
And he went.
And he's giving a speech.
The speech ends, goes to the QA.
A student raises his hand, asks the Iranian president about homosexuals in Iran and how they're treated.
Mahmood Ahmedini said, We don't have any of those in Iran.
And the Columbia student audience began to laugh and chuckle.
And Ahmedini said, Oh, do you know some?
Can you tell us where they live?
And the room got kind of quiet.
So, but I still suggest that many of these traditional Democrat voters will not accept this.
They they they don't they don't think that's the truth about Islam.
Even after Orlando, look at the drive by, even after Orlando, the drive-by's and the media Democrats has done everything that was not.
No, no, no.
That that was what workplace violence.
That was somebody off his rocker for the moment that was somebody and say, no, no.
That having nothing to do with Islam.
That shouldn't surprise you.
Every terrorist act that happens in this country, the drive-bys in the Democrats, oh no, no, no, no, no, nothing to do with Islam.
Islam's a religion of peace.
There is no terrorism.
Anyway, it is what it is.
I mean, Trump did vow, and his foreign policy approach was to defend America at every turn.
Whatever his policies are, they are rooted in the defense and the protection of the United States and its people.
Gonna keep Club Gitmo open.
He wants to continue his discussion about modernizing NATO and so forth.
Now the drive-bys are out, of course, characterizing it as a speech by a nobody who knows nothing, who's an idiot, who's unfit, he's unsuited, he's ignorant, doesn't know what he's talking about.
But I'm telling you, when you boil this down, when you actually look at what Trump said, and I'm I'm sure that some of the things that I'm referring to here are why Newt had his reaction, how important a foreign policy speech it was.
I mean, this is we're in a serious world war.
There is an all-out war on Western civilization.
And there's only one candidate willing to even admit that, and then devise a foreign policy designed to thwart it.
The other candidate won't even admit there's a war on Western civilization because in many ways the Democrat Party is a combatant in trying to undermine Western civilization.
Many of its constituents' groups are part of the army trying to undermine Western civilization.
The Democrat Party seems to find common ground with every anti-American group they can out there.
They find common ground with every minority no matter what.
It's like Scott Walker said, Mrs. Clinton, you're throwing gasoline on Milwaukee here with these comments of yours.
Because what we had in Milwaukee is a definite misstep by a citizen.
The young Sylville, whatever his name is, Smith, the young man shot by the cops.
The guy was a perp.
This was not police misconduct.
There was no moral equivalence here.
There was no, both sides are guilty here.
But Mrs. Clinton comes out with a state, well, this situation just shows how we need respect for the cops.
And the cops need respect for the people.
As though whatever went on in Milwaukee, both sides are guilty.
And that's the moral equivalence we get out of Democrats, and it's not true in Scott Walker the governor.
Don't see you, Mrs. Clinton.
You're just encouraging these people.
You're giving them justification for what they're doing, and there isn't any.
And so it goes.
So that we do have the Democrat candidate by virtue of being a Democrat.
Who is openly and bragging about how big a person she is, how big their hearts are.
What great compassionate by admitting all of these people in the hundreds of thousands is her objective, who are admitted, I don't want to say enemies, but they don't like certain Americans.
In ISIS, ISIS, I know ISIS, by the way, their latest atrocity here about this.
Yeah.
ISIS found a bunch of people in Iraq that they claim were working for the Iraqi government.
The six citizens of Iraq denied it, said they weren't working for the government.
ISIS, screw you.
We think you are, and they boiled them in tar.
In public.
They boiled them in tar.
And this group has openly said, Oh, yeah, we got a bunch of our guys in that bunch of Syrian refugees that are going to be admitted into your country.
And the and the and the party that's got the borders open and welcoming all that into the country.
It's a Democrat Party, and here's Donald Trump over here, saying, uh-uh, not on my watch.
We're going to be real strict on who gets in here.
It's the only sensible approach to take.
And you are not hearing about it.
Because the narrative on Trump is that he's unfit.
He's unsuited.
He's dense, he's stupid, he's inexperienced, he doesn't know what he's talking about.
He's uh too narcissistic, all of that.
So they can't, they can't portray Trump as a serious guy on an issue when it gets serious.
They can't portray his policies as worthwhile.
So they trash them as the usual Republican bigotry.
The usual republican discrimination, that kind of thing.
And then they stop talking about it because they don't want to draw any more attention to it.
Anyway, I take a break here, folks.
We will be back in just a second.
Okay, here are the correct numbers.
Hillary Clinton wants to increase the number of Syrian refugees by 500%.
And that number translates to 65,000 a year.
Uh the current number of Syrian refugees getting into America via Obama dictates is 10,000 a year.
Hillary wants to up that 65,000, not to mention the new just overall Islamic or Muslim immigrants that she wants to admit into the country.
And look, folks, it is what it is.
If you can get mad at me, you leftists out there, you you you get mad at me all you want.
I know that the that hearing the truth sometimes is challenging for you.
But here you have a Republican candidate, Donald Trump, who wants to interview these people, find out what kind of Americans do you have a problem with.
You're not an American, you want to come to America.
Do you hate gays?
Do you hate women?
Do you think women are lesser citizens?
Do you think gays ought not to be able to practice off?
Whatever.
And if they answer honestly, they're not getting in.
Now, what do you want?
Do you want to admit people into this country who are genuinely oriented against women and gays and lesbians and transgenders?
That's what Mrs. Clinton wants to do, with no questions asked.
I mean, it's clear as it can be.
None of this is arguable.
Now you m Hillary wouldn't purposely do this.
Oh, really?
They got the southern border wide open.
They're letting all kinds of people come into this country.
People to do drugs.
Trump's also spelled that out too.
What do you mean they wouldn't never let that happen?
Who do you think is letting all this happen?
Who do you think not only is letting it happen, who do you think's causing much of this?
It's your good old Democrat Party.
And and Mrs. Clinton's been right there at the top of it for 30 years, right in the mix of all this.
Here, listen to this CNN info, babe.
Yesterday afternoon, Clarissa Ward characterizing Trump's speech.
It's exactly as I told you they would do.
The idea that Donald Trump seems to be proposing that we return to the heyday of the brutal dictator, that that somehow is better for the world and for the region is laughable because the reality is the Arab Spring happened.
It didn't happen because of President Obama.
If anything, it was unleashed because of President Bush's invasion of Iraq.
ISIS supporters who I have spoken to say that they would like to see Donald Trump become President of the United States of America because they believe that he will perpetuate the same narrative that they are trying to perpetuate.
Right.
Which is that you're either with us or against us.
You're either a Muslim or you're American, and there is nowhere in between where this is.
No, no, no, no.
See, this is exactly the way that drive-by's are going to portray this to say that ISIS wants Trump.
ISIS wants Hillary.
The Syrian refugees want Hillary.
The illegal alien representatives want Hillary.
All of the people who want to come into this country want Hillary, not Trump.
Trump is out there saying he's going to destroy ISIS.
And here comes the CNN babe along to tell us, oh no, ISIS wants Trump.
They don't know what they're talking about.
This woman is the neophyte, folks.
Back in a sec.
Yeah, folks, I'm I'm telling you, ISIS wants Donald Trump to be president like a turkey.
Wants Thanksgiving every year.
So we just had a soundbite there by Clarissa Ward, who is uh CNN's senior international correspondent, and is blitheringly ignorant here about what she's talking about.
When she says, well, yes, ISIS wants Trump to be president because they believe that he will perpetuate the same narrative that President Bush did, which is that you're either with this or against it.
So they have got Bush on the brain after eight years of Obama opening up to eight years of Obama practically creating ISIS.
It still for these people goes back to George W. Bush, and when he said you're either with us or you're against us.
And they say, no, no, no, no, no, no, that scares them.
It offends them.
It's too black and white.
There's not enough gray area in that.
When Bush said that, that meant there were clear enemies and clear friends, and that's not the way the drive buys or leftists look at things.
And so they think that ISIS would love to have Trump in there because he's just uh a troglodyte.
You're witnesses, you're a guess.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Let me tell you something, folks.
I I made note of this 2008 campaign.
I made note of it in the 2012 campaign.
Whenever any foreign leader decided to comment on a presidential election, they all sounded exactly like the Democrats in our country sound.
When Ahmedini Zod sought to comment on the presidential race in 2012, it might as well have been any other Democrat commenting on Mitt Romney.
It was just incredible.
Well, let's listen to a little bit of Trump from this speech yesterday, and we'll see.
Here's uh, and I don't have these in any particular order.
Um the first bite here is the Trumpster suggesting that Hillary does not have the stamina to fight ISIS.
The rise of ISIS is the direct result of policy decisions made by President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton.
Incident after incident proves again and again, Hillary Clinton lacks the judgment, as said by Bernie Sanders, stability and temperament, and the moral character to lead our nation.
Importantly, she also lacks the mental and physical stamina to take on ISIS and all of the many adversaries we face.
Stamina, stamina, what does that mean?
Well, I mean, you and I know what the word stamina means.
What what what's Trump actually referencing there?
I would suggest he's discussing her health.
And you know what we have by the way, folks.
I I know this is not but yeah, I can't, I can't help this.
I know that this is not cool to do.
But did you see Mrs. Clinton yesterday in that rally with Biden?
Oh.
Uh, she doesn't look well.
And I'm I'm I'm trying to be uh uh generous.
Uh understanding.
She does not look well.
Then I read there's a post out there by the gateway pundit last night that she essentially takes weekends off, that she runs out of gas, that she needs Friday, Saturday, and Sunday to recuperate, or whatever.
I mean, I guess that's the take.
I don't guess anybody really knows why she's taking weekends off.
It's just assumed that it might be uh health-related because of all the other things in the news about her health.
Uh we haven't touched on many of those here at the EIB network as many of the references are a couple months or longer ago old, but uh this uh the video in the still shots I'm sad to say, you know, I'm I'm the one that raised the question way back when, I guess it was in 2008.
You know, back in 2008.
It was and it was not me.
There were all kinds of people asking questions about her age and asking, do we s do we really want to watch a woman of this age age before our eyes in the Oval Offices?
That what we want to see.
I came to her defense when that when you remember.
I I can't I came to her defense when people started on that, but I'm telling you, this is and then there's another picture here.
This is vice president bite me, met Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton at the airport in scranton and eagerly embraced her and wouldn't let go.
And I've got a picture of that.
For 17 seconds, Biden kept his arm around Hillary's waist.
It's not a waste, it's her armpits, folks.
As she tapped him on the arm and appeared to be trying to break free.
This is the most wait, you know what I'm gonna do?
I I've got to fold this page.
I'm gonna show you this on the ditto cam.
Just hang on here a minute, folks.
I gotta get rid of the identifiers on this page.
I gotta turn a ditto cam off, and I gotta zoom in.
Hang on.
For those of you that have ditto cam, you'll see what I'm talking about here in just a minute.
We'll post this picture at uh Rushlinbaugh.com for those of you that don't have it.
Okay, let's see.
All right, here we go.
Uh the ditto camp's coming back on.
That's at the airport in Scranton, and that is bite me with his it looks like he's holding her up.
Looks like she's trying to get away.
The facial expression, you can't really see it there, but the expression on her face is one of oh no, uh frustration.
That went on for 17 seconds.
It does it, it looks like he is serving as her bra, folks.
That's the only way I can describe this.
And then to add to this, I mean, this guy's supposed he's the greatest compassionate guy, smartest guy.
She's smartest woman, she's smartest, he's the smartest guy.
Diddle cam coming off.
Be back on here in just a second.
Then Biden, when it became his turn to talk, to speak, started talking about how stupid Trump is.
And how unqualified Trump is, and how unfit Trump is, and how dangerous it would be for Donald Trump to have access to the nuclear codes.
And then Biden turned around and said, see that guy over there?
He's got the nuclear codes.
That guy follows me around, and he's got the so Biden just told everybody.
The guy with a nuclear code's just standing right over there, and if you want to take him out and get the codes or attack him, or what Biden just pointed him out.
And Trump supposedly the stupid idiot.
And Biden's over there trying to tell everybody how stupid Trump is while bragging about how important he is.
See that guy over there?
See that guy?
That guy follows me everywhere.
And that guy, that guy has the nuclear codes.
And you know why that guy follows me in case something horrible would happen to our president.
I need to have those nuclear codes.
And that guy follows me every that guy holding a nuclear codes, it's a suitcase.
They call it the football.
That guy probably wanted to dig a hole and jump into it.
Biden just pointed out to anybody watching who he is.
You talk about stupid that these people get away with the reputation of branding, the reputation that they're brilliant and that they are compassionate and so forth.
So anyway, that's Hillary doesn't look good in this picture either.
Looks like he's having to hold her up.
It looks like he is actually serving as her Brazier.
I mean, that's as sophisticated away as I can describe the picture for you.
Let's go uh see.
Um we have time.
One more Trump bite from his speech before we go to the break.
This is Trump spelling out yesterday, as in youngstone Ohio, by the way, the end of nation building, which, by the way, is exactly what the Democrats accuse George W. Bush of doing.
We have this senior foreign policy reporter at CNN saying Trump is only going to extend the Bush policies.
And here's Trump basically telling everybody how he is going to be doing much of the exact opposite.
And here's what he said about ending the era of nation building.
When I become president, the era of nation building will be brought to a very swift and decisive.
Our new approach, which must be shared by both parties in America, by our allies overseas, and by our friends in the Middle East, must be to halt the spread of radical Islam.
Listen to the applause here.
All actions should be oriented around this goal.
And any country which shares this goal will be our ally.
Some don't share this goal.
We cannot always choose our friends, but we can never fail to recognize our enemies.
The left hates that.
We don't have enemies.
The Republicans are the enemy.
Trump is the enemy.
Talk radio is the enemy.
Conservatism's the enemy, not ISIS.
Not Black Lives Matter.
Not Syrians.
Not yes, no, no, no, no.
We only have our enemies in America.
But this is right on the money.
This is this nation building business.
If you don't know what that means, the simplest way to say what it means is that we're we're not going to be the world's policeman anymore.
Well, not true.
We may do that, but we're not going to hang around and try to remake nations in our image, like Bush tried to do in Iraq by turning it into a democracy.
We will be back.
Don't go away.
Okay, I just got a note from Coco at rushlimbaugh.com.
We posted the video.
What what it's the um let me click on it.
I'm not sure what video here.
Uh just what video.
I don't know what video is posted.
Biden video.
Biden video is posted.
This is the one that from the the still shot I just showed you on the uh Ditto cam where he's holding Hillary up by the bra.
And where she's trying to get one arms are hanging limp uh at her side.
Okay, to the phones.
We have more of the Trump speech, we have uh audio tape of of Biden, we've got a lot of stuff in Milwaukee today.
Uh not good for the Democrats.
I mean, if you want to break this down of what's going on there and what what has made Milwaukee the powder keg that it is.
I mean, all the trails, all the trails lead right back to the Democrat Party.
As the um as the sheriff, David Clark just keeps saying, here's Edmund in Lexington, Illinois.
It's great to have you up first today, sir.
Hi.
Hi, uh Rush.
I was uh gonna say your first comments about the Muslims and how the Democrats uh really should loathe the anti-gay anti-women group as a whole, but they don't.
Is your message will really resonate with the average Democrat?
And I think just like there's two types of Republicans, there's two types of Democrats.
There's the generic Ohio Democrat, there's the Pennsylvania Democrat.
That's far different than the Democrat in Washington, D.C., who who runs the press.
And so I think if Trump can get that message out, the message that he was uh strangely enough, he's the anti-war candidate.
Uh strangely enough, he's not the guy getting quarter of a million dollars for a speech uh at Wall Street.
I mean, he has many ways to attract the average Democrat.
Um even though it seems like everything you hear about him is like, ah, this just isn't work.
Well, let me ask you about that.
I uh I'm gonna accept your premise only for the moment to ask you this question.
Are you comfortable with are you are you a Trump supporter?
I should get that out of the way first.
Uh yes, I am.
Okay.
Are you comfortable with Trump uh making appeals like this that you think will work to Democrats, as you said, he's the anti-war president, he's the uh uh in many ways he's he's more in common with the uh average Democrat than uh your average Republican.
Does that bother you at all?
Well, uh no, it doesn't.
I mean, I think most Republicans, honestly, uh in retrospect, probably wish they were anti-war in uh you know, in the Iraq war with Bush the Second.
So that doesn't bother me at all.
I think it it just removes the talking point that they can't go to.
They can't go to the how can they go to the anti-women uh talking point when you know he can respond with, you know, are you kidding me?
Look who you want to employ you want to bring into the country, a group that has the death penalty um, you know, for uh openly being openly homosexual in ten countries.
Right.
How does that fit with your progressive views?
No, exactly.
And Trump does not want to let those people in, and Hillary does.
The Democrat Party does, and they want them to come in in droves.
Let me take issue with your premise, because this is an important point.
And uh I hope you're right.
I have long believed what you just said that the Democrat Party is made up of common ordinary everyday people that just happen to be Democrat, because they grew up that way, and to them the Democrat Party is uh FDR and JFK and all that.
But I'm not so sure.
I think the Democrat Party has become almost thoroughly radicalized.
I don't know if there are that many of those Democrats left.
And that's a recent opinion, a recent discovery, and it it has surprised me.
I am genuinely surprised at how little time it has taken for the full breadth of the Democrat Party to become totally extreme radicalized.
And even if you're right, there Edmund, and even if there are Democrats that are not the radical leftists that they're elected leaders in Washington are, they still have one thing in common with those elected leaders in Washington.
When it comes to Republicans, they hate.
Even your JFK Democrats, even your FDR Democrats, even the Democrats, you you said there are two kinds.
You got these radical extreme leftists that are doing God knows what, and then you've got the rank and file.
It may not even really know all that.
They may not really think that they're just loyal to the name, Democrat.
Even if you're right, the one thing those two different groups of Democrats have in common is their hatred for anything Republican.
And that's Trump's biggest obstacle, I think, is they have a genuine institutional hatred because they've been they've been conditioned to have it for God knows their whole lives.
But this one's pretty crystal clear.
This this I don't Trump didn't say it the way I'm saying it, by the way.
I am summarizing what Trump said.
I'm giving you the practical real world result of what Trump said.
All Trump said was if you have designs, and I'm paraphrasing even this.
He said, if you have designs are coming into America and killing Americans or discriminating again, you're not getting in.
Okay.
I'm telling you what that means.
Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, has no such test.
If you are a minority, and if you have any likelihood of registering to vote Democrat, we want you.
That's the Only bar you have to cross.
If you want in this country, you have to make them convince that you're going to register Democrat, that you want to register Democrat, and you're going to vote Democrat, and everything else will be overlooked.
Now you hope that the average Democrats that you know out there that might listen to me would hear this and uh be gotten to.
I do too.
I've I've hoped this for a long time, but I just don't know.
Anyway, I'm it's a good call, Edmund.
I appreciate it.
We'll be back here with uh much more.
Wally Ferris is a foreign policy advisor to Trump, and he was just on Fox, the Business Network with Neil Cavuto, explaining a difference between uh the Trump foreign policy and the Hillary Obama approach.
And it's a good explanation.
We got that coming up, and much more, we've only just scratched the surface.
▲
Export Selection