All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 15, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:58
August 15, 2016, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
I can't tell you the number of times over the years, and some of you may be even guilty of this.
Some of you may know who you are when I recount this story.
I can't tell you the number of times over the many years of broadcast service here, the EIB network, that I have fielded calls.
I can't tell you the number of times that I've been on a golf course.
I can't tell you.
No, because there's too many times.
I can't tell you the times.
There's too many to count.
I can't tell you the times I have been at a soiree at a party.
I can't tell you the number of times I've been out there doing anything where people have come up to me.
We've got to go after the media.
When are we going to go after the media?
Media is killing us.
The media is destroying.
We've got to go after the media.
Now you're seeing what happens when you go after the media.
It doesn't work that no matter how unbalanced, no matter how biased, no matter how unfair, no matter how bunch of cheaters they are, no matter what a bunch of slavish pro-Democrat creeps they are, it never works going after them if you are the candidate.
It makes you look small.
Besides, despite what many people think, the media isn't on the ballot.
Greetings, my friends.
We start here on an upbeat note, the EIB network.
Excuse me.
Rush Limbaugh at 800-282-2882.
If you want to join us and email address, illrushbow at EIBnet.com.
I'm not kidding.
I can't count the number of times.
I've had people tell me, we've got to go after the media.
The media is unfair.
It's biased.
It's unbalanced.
People hate the media and the people don't hate the media.
I've got to be told why, well, it may be so.
All that may be true, but it doesn't work.
It has never worked.
I mean, people have tried it.
Trump has decided he actually was in Fairfield, Connecticut.
Number one, what's Trump doing in Connecticut?
There are maybe 10 Republicans there, and only five of them will admit it.
And he's in Fairfield.
I go to Fairfield every summer to play in the member guest golf tournament at the country club of Fairfield.
And I'm telling you, folks, it's a foreign country.
What is Trump doing there?
I have no idea, but when he was there, he told them in the rally, he said, the heck with running against crooked Hillary.
We're not running against crooked Hillary.
We're running against the crooked media.
And what ticked him off was, I guess the New York Times had a story on his chief campaign guy, Manafort, being involved in some scandal in, where is it, Ukraine?
Manafort supposedly benefiting from some policy in Ukraine.
It just doesn't look pretty.
It's just, and the Wall Street Journal.
Folks, the media today is just, I've never seen this.
I have never seen what I am witnessing.
It's gotten so bad, I'm actually wondering if there's going to be a backlash to this.
I don't know.
I'm not wishful thinking here.
I long ago gave up wishful thinking on anything, not just this.
I mean, just anything.
But I'm looking at this.
This is so unprecedented.
It is just unlike anything I've ever seen.
I just wonder if there will be a, and not a sympathetic backlash.
Don't misunderstand.
I know a lot of people think that people feel sorry for Trump because they're being mistreated.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I don't mean sympathetic backlash.
I doubt it.
But I still have never seen anything.
Like a Wall Street Journal has given Trump an ultimatum.
You get out, you get out by Labor Day, or we're through with you.
And I didn't know they were ever with him.
Sorry to be laughing about what else are we going to do here.
The editors of the Wall Street Journal are saying that Trump needs to change his tack or drop out and give the nomination over to Mike Pence.
The journal editors gave Trump until Labor Day to submit to their ultimatum.
I really don't know what they're going to do if Trump does not submit to their ultimatum.
I don't know what else there is they can do.
In the good old days, Labor Day was when campaigns really began.
In the good old days, like four years ago and eight years ago, Labor Day actually marked the official, well, not the official, but it was everybody's back from vacation.
Everybody's back to school.
People getting up, normal times, going to bed at normal times, and the routine.
Post-summer vacation sets in, and that's traditionally when the majority of people start paying attention To campaigns.
So that's still two weeks away.
So the drive-bys, the Wall Street Journal, have declared that Trump, at least three or four times, they've declared that he's already lost the election.
So it's amazing.
Trump's changing a lot of things.
He's changing the electoral calendar.
He's changing any number of things.
And now he's lost the election.
Here we are on August 15th with a newspaper actually giving him an ultimatum to get out.
They don't say what they're going to do otherwise.
The New York Times has a story about 20 anonymous Trump insiders who say that he can't be controlled, that he's depressed, he's down on the dumps, that he's sullen, he's inconsolable, that none of this is working out the way he thought it would work out.
There are people, ostensibly, it's in the New York Times, ostensibly close to the Trump campaign, who are saying that Trump really thought he'd been able to win over the media with his charm and with his public appearances and with the charismatic nature of his personality and so forth, much as he did during the primaries.
And, I mean, not to get too serious here, folks, because I don't know that that's called for, but does anybody think this was going to be easy?
What are we doing here?
What is this election really that it turn out to be about?
It turns out to be trying to take away all of the reins of power and all of the perks and everything associated with being a member of the establishment.
Did anybody think that the establishment, be they Republican, Democrat, Martian, communist, are they just going to sit around and leave that up to the Democrat process?
They are not.
They're not just going to sit there and wait till November, whatever the election date is, and then throw their fortunes to the great unwashed on election day.
So they've taken all these, and the media is part of the establishment, and there are many Republicans in it.
Practically anybody in Washington is in the establishment.
So they were not going to be won over.
They were not going to be persuaded to abandon their club or their organization.
You could look at it as globalist versus nationalist.
You can look at it as populist versus conservative.
You can look at it as whatever it is, but it is the powerful versus the powerless.
And the powerless were never going to win this.
Well, now, wait a minute.
Let me finish the sentence.
I don't want to leave the powerless were never going to win this in a contest where the nominee tries to persuade the powerful to give it up.
But, Rush, what about the emails?
What about the emails, the schme mails, folks?
There's nothing that's going to happen with the emails.
I don't care what's found in them.
We should know that by now.
No matter what's found in them, there isn't any.
And besides, the Republicans are not serious about investigating any of this stuff on Capitol Hill.
And so absent that, the media isn't going to do it.
I'm sorry, I love the people.
I love Tom Fitton and all the people at Judicial Watch, but they can't do this by themselves.
They simply cannot call attention to Hillary's emails.
They can't request them.
Well, they can do all this and they can provide the results, but they're not going to go anywhere because there's no official.
The courts are not going to pursue it.
The DOJ has made it clear they're not going to pursue anything.
And now Leon Panetta, no, I haven't forgotten about Milwaukee.
I can tell you what happened in Milwaukee in 30 seconds.
Just a repeat of all kinds of things.
I'll get to Milwaukee in a second, but I'm waiting actually on a soundbite because the sheriff up there had the best soundbite of all this.
Read about, oh, I forget what it was, an hour ago.
I'm waiting for that bite to be put together.
And I'm going to build off of that.
So I haven't, I'm not ignoring it.
Back to Panetta.
Panetta was on this week.
Now, Panetta is part of the Clinton war room.
He was Bill Clinton's chief of staff when Panetta was leaving as Clinton's chief.
I'll never forget this.
There's things in politics that I, who consume practically everything I see, I remember most of what I see and read.
It's an amazing feat.
Don't have to practice it.
It just happens.
Some are born with good brains.
Some aren't.
I am.
I'll never forget Panetta and his resignation day as chief of staff.
And he was just sucking up to Clinton like you can't believe.
Was giving Bill Clinton credit for every damn good thing that's ever happened in the world since God created it.
It was the most slavish.
I thought he was going to die of anal poisoning.
I really did.
It was so kiss-ass that I was there to listen.
I said, does this guy not know the guy he's been working for?
So anyway, that's who Panetta is.
I mean, he's a loyalist.
Like, you can't know dying of anal poison has nothing to do with one's sexual orientation.
It's describing, I just, I said it.
It's describing a sycophant.
That's all I mean now.
So Panetta goes on this week with Stephanopoulos, whoever was hosting it Sunday.
And he said, can't we just move on from these emails for crying out loud?
I mean, it doesn't matter anyway.
This is politics.
He was talking about the revelations of pay-for-play.
He was openly admitting that entities representing foreign governments donating to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for consideration, Secretary of State, or as a future president.
Hey, that's what politics is.
And I'm sure to a guy like Clinton and Panetta, politics is selling yourself to the highest bidder.
And that's what it's become.
And it's been that way since Clinton was in office starting in 1993.
So what's the big deal?
That's why Bill Clinton's running around saying, Comey's full of bull.
That FBI director, he's full of bull.
He's a load of bull.
What's that guy saying?
Because to them, pay-for-play, selling access, taking money personally and at your foundation in exchange for favorable policies.
That's how you do it.
That's what politics is to these people.
There isn't anything illegal.
There isn't anything shavy.
It's just the new norm.
And of course, that fits perfectly with the devolution of our culture overall.
So, but anyway, when I saw Panetta say it, can we all just move on?
I imagined practically everybody in the audience watching that show going, yeah, yeah, because I'm sick and tired of hearing about it, people are saying.
You know, you can only hear so much.
And then there better be some action behind it or it begins to become a tune-out.
And now we've been hearing about Hillary Clinton's emails how many months or years now?
Well, that's a long time, whatever it is.
And we can have news stories about what's in there.
We can have information from Judicial Watch.
AP might even run occasionally a story about what's in Mrs. Clinton's emails.
But if the sheriff doesn't come calling, if the Department of Justice doesn't, better yet, if the FBI director goes on TV and says there's nothing here, then Panetta comes along.
Well, he did.
He said there's nothing there prosecutable, even though there is.
But he said, there's nothing in here that a reasonable prosecutor would pursue.
That's it, as far as the low-information crowd is concerned.
So then Panetta goes on TV Sunday.
Can we move past this?
And I guarantee there's a chorus to people going, yeah, yeah.
But look, it's always dangerous getting into see I Told You So mode because people interpret that as condescending and being negative.
And I don't intend to be either.
But I have never believed, because I have intelligence guided by 25, 27 years of experience, we are not going to illegal the Clintons out of office.
Scandal is not ever going to harm them.
There is no evidence that it ever has.
And there's plenty of evidence that people believe.
There are all kinds of Clinton scandals that people believe, and it doesn't matter to them.
No, Trump's not making a big deal about the emails, but I mean, people that are opposed to Hillary, and I am at the top of that list, I'm the head of that club, waiting for some kind of magic to happen.
People have been waiting for that to happen or befall the Clintons for as long as they've been in national public life.
Nothing has happened.
I want to remind you, too, I made this comment.
You remember when the Supreme Court vacated the convictions of the former Virginia governor Bob McConnell and his lovely and gracious wife?
You may not remember this, but they had the evidence on it.
$175,000 of basically bribes, pay-for-play.
They had accepted all these goodies.
I mean, and it was chump chain stuff.
It was like TVs and stereos and rings and who knows what.
The Supreme Court threw all that out, threw the convictions out.
Even though the evidence was conclusive.
And when the Supreme Court threw it out, I said, this is the best news that the elected class in Washington could possibly get.
The Supreme Court has just said, essentially, by vacating the convictions on McConnell, that it's too difficult to prove political corruption.
Pay for play.
It's just too difficult to prove it.
It's really difficult to prove when nobody's trying to, outside of judicial watch or Citizens United, when the DOJ is not trying to, when the Republicans don't want to get anywhere near it.
No, no, no, no, no, no, Mrs. Clinton's vulnerable in a lot of other ways.
It just doesn't have to be scandal.
She's vulnerable as she can be on policy.
But for some reason, decision has been made to go after the media today.
Now, there's also a funny story.
Let me take a break.
It's somewhere in the stack.
I won't find it in time.
Let me take a break.
It's something about a Clinton campaign bracing for final Trump attack.
I can't imagine the Clinton campaign bracing for anything, Andrew.
No, no, no.
I do not believe, I find it hard to believe that 20 Trump staffers would go crying to the New York Times.
The New York Times tried to mislead everybody in what happened in Milwaukee.
The New York Times tried to portray a picture where the shooter was another innocent, unarmed black man gunned down by a voracious, racist white cop.
It's in their headlines, unarmed.
The shooter was not unarmed, and he was not, he was a thug.
We now know who he is, and the cop was African-American.
But the New York Times tried to get everybody thinking that we were looking at gentle giant two here.
So would they report that 20 unhappy Trump staffers would call him up and start crying about the Donald?
I wouldn't put anything past them.
I don't, it'd be really hard-pressed to believe that, is my point.
Here's the story here: Clinton campaign gearing up for Donald Trump to bet everything on one final major attack.
And it's in a fundraising email sent out by Robbie Mook, who is the campaign manager.
Mook has come to this conclusion, he said, because Trump's raised a ton of money, but he hadn't spent any of it yet.
So the Clinton campaign thinks that Trump's saving up all this money for one big, huge nuclear blast on Hillary and her campaign.
We'll see.
I want to play a soundbite from one of the protesters, unidentified, talking Saturday night in Milwaukee.
And I want you to listen to what this man says.
Is this, folks, not only does this embody what socialism and liberalism and communist teaching and everything, but more importantly, this is exactly what I have told you.
This is exactly how the left has distorted the definition of what trickle-down economics is.
It's sad because, you know, this will happen because they're not helping the black community.
Like, you know, the rich people, they get all this money and they're not like, you know, trying to give us nothing.
That's what trickle-down has become.
The rich are getting all the money.
The rich are taking all the money and they're not sharing it.
They're not giving it to us.
They're taking it from us, but they're not giving any of it to us.
That's exactly how the left has succeeded.
That young man there may not know it, but he has perfectly regurgitated what the Democrat Party has succeeded in doing in defining trickle-down economics.
Trickle-down economics is simply economic commerce taking place.
But no, trickle-down is the rich taking all the money and then hoarding it, not giving it back to anybody.
Hi, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh kicking off a brand new week of broadcast excellence here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
All right.
Ann Althaus pointed this, at least this is where I found it, is where I saw it, Ann Althaus on her website or her blog.
At 10.06 a.m.
And I guess this was yesterday.
Unrest in Milwaukee, New York Times headline, unrest in Milwaukee after police fatally shoot unarmed man.
Now, this is important because the shooter was not unarmed.
Not only was he armed, he had a record.
There was a photo posted of him somewhere aiming a gun at the camera.
He looks unsavory.
There's no question.
He's got a long record.
He was not the innocent black victim that the New York Times and the media always try to set up in these events.
It was clear that they were attempting to set up another hands-up, don't shoot type episode, this one in Milwaukee, which has been run by Democrats for I don't know how long.
When's the last Republican Mayor Milwaukee?
1908?
I mean, it's Republicans haven't had a say-so in this town, in its culture, in its dominant governance in decades.
So anyway, the Milwaukee County Sheriff, this is how the New York Times story leads off, Milwaukee County Sheriff requested the aid of the National Guard after a night of violence and fires, including the shooting of an armed man by an officer.
They had it right in the body of the story.
But everybody knows the headline is the money part of any story because that's the first thing people see after police fatally shoot unarmed man.
So unarmed becomes the narrative.
Unarmed becomes the whole focus of the story, and it isn't true.
Then the next New York Times headline, Governor Activates National Guard after police shooting.
Governor Scott Walker of Wisconsin called for the reinforcements following a night of violence that began hours after a Milwaukee police officer fatally shot a fleeing armed man.
So they got it right.
But even in this Activates National Guard after police shooting, here's what's going on.
I don't know if you've heard it or not, but Black Lives Matter plans to shut down Graceland this week.
Elvis Presley's own.
This is Graceland Week, apparently.
Memphis, people show up, and the coalition of concerned citizens, I think Black Lives Matter, is almost approaching unionized gang status now.
They have imprimatur from the White House.
They have their leaders up there honored for the great work that they do.
And they're rabble-rousers.
And they're going to go into an event that's always peaceful and try to cause trouble.
The coalition of concerned citizens, including Black Lives Matter protesters and other, I was going to say gangs, excuse me, groups, announced their plan to shut down Graceland.
Protest leaders say the mass demonstration planned for 6 p.m. today, probably Central Time, Memphis, on Central Time.
They said that they specifically chose Graceland because it's Elvis Week, and they know that a lot of people will be watching.
Leaders say they also chose Graceland because it demonstrates one of Memphis' most common forms of financial inequality and because the site has ties to the death of unarmed teen Darius Stewart.
Frank Gotti, well-known community organizer, said, we feel like we still haven't been answered.
They're giving us the runaround.
Yeah, Graceland, it's just hell of a lot to answer for.
Graceland?
Recently in front of Graceland, some Black Lives Matter protesters were detained for blocking traffic at the time activists said they wanted their demands met by the city, which they admitted would take time.
Graceland's got nothing to do with anything here.
But they're showing up, and they're going to have all kinds of attention focused on them.
Sympathetic, naturally.
And I want you to grab audio soundbite number 16.
This is so, you wonder how attitudes are created and you wonder how mindsets are created.
And if you watch an event like this, okay, so Milwaukee happens, you have a legitimate shooting.
But in this climate, and the New York Times paper of record first reports that the poor victim was again unarmed, and we've got a bunch of racist cops on the prowl when that turned out to be exactly wrong.
Have you ever sat and asked yourself, why do these people think the way they think?
What in the world are they so enraged about?
Do because they've got Barack Obama in office for eight years.
And they've had Hillary Clinton right next to his side for eight years.
And electing Barack Obama was supposed to stop all of this.
Electing Barack Obama was supposed to set us on the path to fixing all this, to solving all this, to promoting unity.
And those who felt like they'd been taken for granted, taken advantage of, screwed and all, they were going to get theirs.
Obama was going to turn the tables.
And Obama was going to screw the screwers.
And he was going to make sure that the disadvantaged got theirs.
And of course, the disadvantaged and the minority, they're angrier than ever.
They're more upset than ever.
They're more violent than ever.
Well, not than ever.
60s had its share of violence.
But I mean, in our modern era and these two or three generations alive today, this to some is precedent setting.
And if you want to know, I mean, somebody has to stoke this anger.
Somebody has to feed it.
Somebody has to lie to them.
And I want you to listen again, this unidentified guy, Audio Soundbite 16.
This is from Channel 4 Eyeball News, Milwaukee, WTMJ TV.
And they found this guy walking around, a protester, and he was asked why they're rioting.
What in the world are you writing about?
I mean, a cop, a black cop, shot an African-American thug that was armed and was fleeing the scene.
Why are you rioting?
And note, the answer is not even about the incident.
The incident just provided the opportunity.
The incident provided simply another chance to raise hell and to express grievance.
But listen to this again.
It's sad because, you know, this will happen because they're not helping the black community.
Like, you know, the rich people, they get all this money and they're not like, you know, trying to give us none.
Okay, I'm telling you, folks, I can't emphasize this enough.
That is exactly how the Democrat Party, since 1983 since 1983, has been defining Reagan economics.
Reaganomics, trickle-down, whatever.
They crucify it.
They criticize it.
They cream it.
And they claim it doesn't work, that it makes the rich richer, the rich get rich by taking money from the poor, and it never trickles back down.
They never give it to them.
They never donate it.
They never hire them.
They never give it to them.
And of course, that's not what trickle-down is.
Trickle down is you go to the hardware store to buy a chainsaw to go out and cut down some wood to use for your fireplace.
That's trickle-down.
Everybody benefits from your decision to buy the chainsaw.
Trickles down.
Your purchase trickles down.
That's what trickle-down is economic commerce.
And the more of it, the better.
And since the rich spend money too, there's really a lot of trickle down from them.
But no, no, no, no.
Not according to Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, you name it.
Trickle down is the rich stealing as much money as they can, getting richer, and then not giving it to anybody.
Now, at the root of all this, as it always is, is money.
No matter what anybody tells you, at the root of all this is economics and the fact that there is poverty and that people are poor while others aren't.
And the Democrat Party has been exploiting that and teaching the wrong lessons for as long as I've been alive.
The evidence is abundant right in front of us.
We live in an absolute economic disaster, given that we are the United States of America.
The unemployment rate's not 5%, it's 23%.
There are 94 million Americans not working.
There is massive inflation, yet we're told there isn't any.
If you don't think there's inflation, compare what you buy today to what you paid for it five years ago or last year.
There is inflation, but officially the inflation rate's zero.
Not true.
Because the inflation rate's zero, banks aren't lending any money because they say they can't.
Now we've been talking about interest rates where you're going to have to pay the bank for keeping your money.
The Federal Reserve has printed $5 trillion and it's all gone to Wall Street.
Hoping for trickle-down from Wall Street to Main Street.
It hadn't happened because that's top-down or bottom-up.
And that's not how trickle-down actually works when you involve Wall Street in the mix.
But the point is, while people are being told there's an economic recovery going on, there isn't.
But these dumb cops, they believe it.
They know nothing better.
They already think trickle-down's something that it isn't.
At the same time, they hear this great recovery.
They hear Obama talk about it.
Hillary talk about it.
They hear Biden talk about it.
Yeah, it could be better, and we're going to make it better.
But there's all these new jobs being created, except these people don't have them.
And all this money is being made and all this wealth, these houses, you can't afford to buy a house anymore.
It's so expensive.
These people can't.
So all around them is evidence of economic growth when there really isn't any.
Because primarily they're being told it.
They don't have any, and they haven't been told.
They don't know how to measure on their own economic activity.
They're totally prisoners to whatever the government tells the media and the media tells them.
They have been trained to smirk at work, the concept of work.
That's part of the rigged system because only favorites get the good paying jobs in their world.
So there's nothing legit about the U.S. economy.
So the only hope they've got is for the federal government, the state government, being Santa Claus.
Well, of course, the federal government can't be Santa Claus and make everybody rich.
We're already $20 trillion in debt and counting.
The government isn't making anybody rich with handouts, with welfare, no matter how you count it, unless you want to talk about the few, relatively few cases of people exploiting welfare fraudulently and making a living out of that.
But these people, I actually feel sorry for them.
They have been lied to their whole lives about the lack of opportunity in America.
The game is rigged against them.
It's all stacked largely because they're black, they're told.
Or because they're minorities.
So they're seething with rage out there.
And that's fomented as well.
There are real world reasons for this disparity in income, and it has nothing to do with capitalism.
It has everything to do with socialism and the false promise and the liars who make up the leaders in a socialistic government or enterprise.
I have to take a break here, but I want you to hear David Clark, the sheriff up in Milwaukee, analyze all of this.
He does it extremely well.
We'll do that.
We get back from this time out.
I just got an email.
No, I did not contradict myself.
I know I'm on record many times as saying poverty is not why there's terrorism.
Poverty is not why there's crime.
That's exactly right.
When I'm talking about money and the disparity, I'm talking about the criminal element.
The criminal element is all of this is economics.
They're mad they don't have.
But the problem is they have never been taught, it's never been impressed upon them, the legitimate way to earn money.
It's out there to be earned.
It's out there to be had, but they don't know how.
They've been told they can't.
They've been told a deck stacked against them.
They've been told they don't stand a chance.
They've been told there's racism, bigotry, sexism, bigotry, homophobia.
They don't even try.
So crime, terrorism, getting mad at the man, mad at the system is the only result outrage that they've got.
The only recourse they think they've got, because they've been lied to by the very people they vote for all of these years, all their lives, all these different generations added up.
So of course it's economics, but it's much deeper than that.
It's that they've just been lied to.
They've been lied to by people raising them.
And the people that have been raised have been lied to by the Democrat Party, which gets lied to by the media, vice versa.
It's just one never-ending cycle of you can't do this, you can't do that.
It's not your fault.
Their deck is stacked against you.
The game is rigged against you.
You can't do that.
It's their fault.
They're making sure you don't get anything.
And they end up believing.
And by the way, the they happen to be Republicans.
The they happen to be the rich.
The they happen to be Wall Street, which owns a Democrat Party, lockstock, and barrel.
David Clark on Fox this morning, he is the Milwaukee County Sheriff.
He was asked, what do you think about how all of this weekend activity has evolved?
Saturday night, the social order totally collapsed in a part of the city of Milwaukee.
And when that happens, tribal behavior takes over, and tribal behavior leads to the law of the jungle replacing the rule of law.
Here's what causes riots.
We have inescapable poverty in the city of Milwaukee.
Milwaukee's like the sixth poorest city in America.
You have massive black unemployment.
I think it's at 32%.
You have a failing K-12 public education system.
It's one of the worst in the nation.
You have questionable lifestyle choices.
Some of this is self-inflicted.
All these kids with no fathers around.
Father absent homes.
When fathers aren't around to shape the behavior of young men, they oftentimes grow up to be unmanageable misfits.
Those are the ingredients.
Milwaukee has all of them.
Well, who's run the place for longer than most of us have been alive?
Answer: Democrat Party.
It matters.
You know, there are even some fathers who are home or no prizes.
That's not a racial comment, but I mean, there's human debris everywhere, whether they're home or not.
Some of them could be just as bad if they are at home.
And television happens to glorify a lot of those type characters in TV shows.
But the sheriff here is right on the money.
And there are a couple of more things he added to this.
Sadly, I had diarrhea of the mouth, and I talked longer than I should, so I couldn't start early enough to get all three bites in before the end of the segment.
But I'm working on it, folks.
Don't go away.
Just getting warmed up, folks.
Just getting started.
El Rushbo with inexhaustible energy behind the Golden EIB microphone, a brief time out here, back in mere moments.
I did.
I reread the clock.
But you know what?
I still don't have time to squeeze in.
Well, I do.
Now I don't.
I've talked through it.
I did.
I misread the clock by a minute.
I got so excited that beta 6 had just been delivered.
Beta 6 was just made available for download, and I was just turning around to get my fourth device to download it on, and I looked at the clock real quick.
No, in fact, this is one more beta than I expected.
So there'll be at least, this could be the last one before the Goldmaster.
We're getting close.
We're getting close.
And it is really cool.
It's like getting a brand new phone.
I'm not kidding you.
It's awesome.
Anyway, there's polling data here.
Some good for Trump, some of it not good.
All of that and much more.
Now it's time to go.
I'm sorry about that, folks.
▲
Export Selection