All Episodes
Aug. 1, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:24
August 1, 2016, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
That is a delicious cake.
I went in there and I had a couple of bites of it.
And it's my favorite kind.
Favorite kind.
Great.
I appreciate it.
Greetings and welcome back, my friends.
We're starting our 29th year today here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network Anniversary 28.
It all started August 1st 198.
In New York City, I think back a lot.
I think back to the early days.
I listened to how, even after 28 years, this program and its origins are to this day mischaracterized.
Purposely done.
They're misstated on purpose.
Ultimately for the purpose to not have to admit or to damage the actual commercial success of the program.
The criticism is oriented toward making it look like this program's the result of never-ending financial backers and donors, of which there are none and never have been any.
But even so, you know, the first the first few months were, I mean, all of it was fascinating.
You know, I have a theory that when you look back, uh, you tend to remember the good things.
Some people obsess on the negative, but but most people, that's what nostalgia is.
You remember the good things about it.
And I do, that's that's true of me too.
I remember some of the some of the struggles, and I remember on numerous occasions thinking that we weren't going to make it, but not because of me.
Interestingly, for other reasons.
Uh, but I was wrong.
Uh we we did make it.
And just as Donald Trump has been in the public eye for 30 years, and it only is recently he became a racist after he decided that he was going to run for president.
Same with me, my entire life.
I had never been known for hating anybody.
I had never been known for bigotry, racism, sexism, any of the phobias.
But within a month of starting my radio program, I was all of those.
And it was I didn't understand it at first.
I didn't understand any of it at first.
Uh you know, in a sense, and I this just occurred to me in a sense, 28 years ago I was kind of like Trump is now, in the sense that there was nobody to tell me.
There was nobody there to really advise me.
I had a couple of people who correctly identified what was going on.
I mean, what when uh a lot of people, you need to hire PR firm, Rush, you need to answer some of this stuff.
So we interviewed a couple PR people, and I learned very simply, PR people, you pay them to tell you what kind of work you have to do.
So I said, I don't need that.
I already know what I need to do.
But one of them, a guy named Bob Dillenschneider said, you know, you're you're worried about this way too much.
It only means one thing, and that is you're too effective.
And as long as you remain effective, you're gonna be a target for destruction for these people.
So you may as well get used to it, and there's no PR campaign you can mount to do away with it.
They're always going to be coming for you.
Because I had transcended the realm of radio and broadcasting and entertainment, and I found myself front and center in American politics, which was not the objective, but the people that constantly criticize the program claimed that that was the whole purpose.
Limbaugh and his backers decided that there was a vacuum of conservatism in the media.
And so sought to immediately fiddle and vacuum.
of the sort.
We were pursuing profit by pure and simple.
We were pursuing commercial success.
That was going to define whether we made it or not.
Not whether we had come to matter to anything or anybody in uh in politics.
Anyway, so here we are, and year 29 has officially begun.
Great to have you with us, folks.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882, and the email address, Elrushbo at EIBNet.com.
A couple of interesting things here today that I think, and just my opinion.
I'm I if somebody wants to think I'm offering advice, feel free.
I guess maybe I am, but it's it's uh it's in an indirect fashion.
No, no, I'm I'm I'm gonna save these sound bites from the the past.
We always every anniversary, we go back and play some highlights in the past.
But I think the sticky issues crowd would go nuts, particularly.
So I'll save this.
The monologue, one hour from now, monologue hour, third hour, I'll do these things.
They're they're funny.
They're actually good.
And we haven't done them before.
Well, one of them we haven't done before.
Uh a couple things here that I think in the Trump campaign ought to immediately become front and center.
Now they may feel a compulsion to continue to deal with the Kazir Khan business.
And if they do, fine.
Uh they may think that there is a way to turn this and flip it.
And there is, but it doesn't involve Mr. Kahn or Mrs. Kahn.
It doesn't involve the way she looked on stage, what she was wearing, whether she spoke or not.
It involves a contrast in the way, and not the media, the way the Democrats treat particular parents of dead war heroes.
This all needs to be put on the Democrats.
The Democrats are the opponent.
Hillary Clinton is the opponent.
Kazir Khan is just a pawn.
He's either a winning or unwitting pawn.
Charlie Hurt at thehill.com has a column today claiming that this guy Khan actually ended up being tricked by the Democrats into being used to advance and cover up some of the negatives of Hillary Clinton, like the fact that she is a congenital liar.
But look at this.
While a contentious presidential election dominates the media, a new survey finds that a sense of alienation, alienation among average Americans is at an all-time high.
Now, for decades, the Harris poll has gauged how much or how little people feel their interests are heard and addressed by those with power and influence.
These are striking numbers.
The latest Harris survey found that 82% of Americans believe that the people running the country don't really care what happens to them.
Now this is the same question that in the 2012 exit polls, Obama beat Mitt Romney 81 to 19.
That question in the exit polls cares about people like me.
Obama 81 Romney, 19%.
It was that question and another question that indicated most voters still blame Bush for the economy that told me at 5 in the afternoon that Obama had won the election before the votes even began to count it.
If if those exit numbers were right, then it was over.
And they were right.
So now we have 82% of the American people believing the people running the country don't really care about them.
I'll bet you Obama would not score 81 to 19 on that now.
He still escapes a lot of blame for this.
And that's because of tactics.
That's the limbaugh theory to explain how Obama escapes any accountability.
But it doesn't matter.
Obama's not in the ballot now.
The Democrats have run the country for eight years.
This ought to become front and center in the Trump message.
82% of Americans, Trump already has a sizable percentage of this group supporting him.
And he can grow it.
82% of Americans believe the people running the country don't really care what happens to them.
The Democrats have been running the country.
I'm sure the Republicans are considered part of this too.
They're in the power base.
Another 78% say that the richer getting richer, the poor getting poorer.
That's always going to be said.
People are always going to think the rich are getting richer because the rich do.
I mean, if you have a rich pile of money and it sits there and grows, and you're a poor person, your pile of money, your pile of money is smaller.
The richer always going to get richer.
It's usually in a prosperous America where the economy is growing.
People don't care as much about that because their lives are satisfying.
But that's not the case now.
People's lives are not satisfying, and they are scared.
Even people who have jobs are scared that they're going to get fired.
People who have savings are scared they're going to lose it.
There is no ebulliance, there is no optimism, there is no uplifting, and there's nobody providing any.
So 78% say the richer getting richer to poor getting poorer.
That's always the case.
The key is not having it count as much.
And you do that with a burgeoning and growing economy.
70% believe that most people in power try to take advantage of people like them.
I think you're always going to have a majority of people who think that too, but these are very high numbers.
The Harris survey also found that 68% believe that what they think doesn't count very much anymore, while 40% say that they are left out of things going on around them.
Now, Harris has conducted this poll every year since 1966.
These are the most negative results yet.
These numbers or this survey needs to become front and center.
Trump instinctively already taps into this growing population group.
He just instinctively does.
And he's got, because of the basis on the basis of the survey, I think he's got a lot of room for growth.
And here's the next story that needs to be used in conjunction with this.
It's an editorial from the investors business daily.
Obama's economic recovery is now 2.2 trillion dollars below average.
Here's another way of stating this.
The so-called Obama recovery.
I dispute that it's a recovery.
I think we have been in a recession since Obama took office.
However, the statistics indicate that this is, if you want to call this a recovery, this is the worst economic recovery since 1949.
And sadly, a lot of low information people still blame this on George W. Bush.
Here's why.
It's not that hard to understand.
If you go back to 2008 and the financial crisis...
Hell, folks, even today, it's still presented as the near collapse of the world.
To this day, that's how it's reported.
The near collapse of the world.
And it is in those circumstances that poor Obama took office.
Oh my God, he's worked so hard trying to fix it, but it was worse than anybody knew.
And he's still trying, and that's the story.
Obama is not tagged as having contributed to this in any way, shape, or form.
That needs to change.
Because Obama is the Democrat Party, and because Hillary Clinton is Obama the third term.
And all of this needs to be tied to the Democrats.
The Republicans haven't done it for I don't know how long, and Trump had better start.
Because this is life in America under Democrat Party rule.
This is what happens when the Democrats win.
Eighty-two percent of Americans believe people running the country don't care what happens to them.
We've got an economic recovery that isn't one.
It is 2.2 trillion below average.
The way this could be explained closer to home.
Had Obama's recovery, now it is 28th quarter.
If Obama's recovery had been as robust as the average of the past 10 recoveries, The nation's economy would be 2.2 trillion dollars bigger than it is today.
That translates into more than $17,000 additional per household.
There's your wage increase that hasn't happened.
There's your job that you lost in Obama's lackluster recovery that for some stupid reason still gets blamed on George W. Bush and the Republicans.
This needs to change.
It's a presidential campaign where this can change.
We in the media can bleat about it all day long.
The presidential campaign needs to change the subject, still focus on Hillary, and now she can't tell the truth, and she's lying about Benghazi, lying about the emails and all of that.
But then people are already scared economically.
You have to scare them even more because it's true.
If Hillary continues what Obama has started, we face an economic stagnation like people don't remember will have not have experienced in their lifetimes.
Hillary's tax increase plan alone is guaranteed to stagnate U.S. economic growth.
So we would be 2.2 trillion dollars bigger.
That if you run the numbers, that's $17,000 additional per household.
So there's your raise you didn't have.
The job you might have lost is all tied into Obama's lack of a recovery.
And by the way, this is all on Obama.
Ronald Reagan recovered from a horrible Jimmy Carter four years.
In three years, you can do it with policy.
Obama's policies have further stagnated our economy.
Obama care.
Obama's tax increases, including those attached to Obamacare.
Our expanding welfare state, the number of people on food stamps continues to grow.
The number of people not in the workforce, there is no foundation for economic growth in America today.
It has not been laid.
It in fact has been eaten away.
And I can remember the days, Mr. Schnurley, maybe you can too.
I can remember the days when a presidential campaign was all about the economy.
And let me tell you, the Democrats do not want it to be about the economy this year, which is why the Washington Post story today announcing that Hillary is going to totally shift her focus, which this is really a shift.
She's been doing it already.
And her campaign is going to be almost totally devoted to destroying Trump.
And exposing Trump as unqualified, unprepared, unsuited, you name it.
That was Sally Bradshaw I was talking about in Jeb Bush's office.
That's the name.
Sally Bradshaw, I says here, uh top advisor.
Jeb Bush top advisor, Sally Bradshaw left the Republican Party to become an independent.
Well, but it's after this, there's a lot of people saying that they are voting for Jeb because what are voting for Trump because of what became of the Republican Party.
Anyway, to the phones we go.
Tom in St. Cloud, Minnesota, glad that you called, sir.
Great to have you on the program.
How are you?
Great Rush.
Every day we let you into the house to help homeschool our three children, and we just think you're the best at what you do.
Thank you.
Very I appreciate that very much.
Look, we're going classic banana, good time rocker old bonkers that Trump keeps going off topic.
Look at we have 1.3 GDP growth.
My health insurance for my family, Rush, cost more almost as much as a mortgage.
And I saw a poll out that Hillary from the LA Times that Hillary was only leading in polls one day in July.
Why isn't he just bury her and keep on topic?
It's driving us crazy.
I have friends who think that he doesn't even really want to win.
That he's really not serious about it.
Because what does he care if he doesn't win?
He goes back to Trump Tower in his IP Palace, and he's okay, well, we're we're suffering.
Um are you a I don't want to assume.
Are you a Trump Supporter.
Die hard.
Die hard Trump supporter.
Okay, so you are frustrated that he doesn't seem to be able to stay on message and is able to be distracted.
Now, I've I've also had people over the course of not just recently, but through this entire campaign.
I mean, these conspiracy people are out there left and you know Trump really doesn't want to win.
You know Trump.
In fact, you want to hear the craziest conspiracy, maybe not even a conspiracy theory.
The craziest theory.
Yeah.
No, I'm not I I don't have enough, I'm just on the clock.
Don't have enough time.
I'll get that later.
I want to deal with you.
I think what people are misinterpreting about Trump, your people that say, gosh, I don't even think the guy wants to win.
Have you heard the criticism that Trump makes everything about him that Trump is only about him?
Uh this is a common refrain the Democrats use, that's Elizabeth Warren.
He doesn't care about you, he only cares about himself.
That's not true.
That's not true.
But Trump does, I think, believe that he is the only person that can defend himself against any of these assaults.
And that's why he does seem to take these things personally and seek to refute them.
This has been his modus operandi before he got into politics.
If you attacked him, he went after you, whether it seemed to make sense or not.
It's I don't know if it's a strategy or if it's a personality trait or or what have you.
But it doesn't mean he doesn't care about you, or it doesn't mean that he's only in this for himself, but he does take a lot of things personally.
That's not wise.
Your guiding light, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Okay, let me give you another theory that's rolling around out there.
Because, and you look, think of this what you will, ladies and gentlemen, but uh I I'm I'm getting email, and I've talked to people over the weekends since this whole thing blew up with Kazir Khan.
I I got people who think you guys are missing this.
This is not that bad for Trump.
It's not bad at all.
I said, What?
Well, how do you figure that?
And they said, Because the American this is a street fight.
Trump is a street fighter.
You rush, you ought to be the first guy to recognize this.
You've told everybody how outside the box this guy is.
And everybody is looking at this like a traditional political faux pas, like it's a giant stepping in a biggest bag of manure that's ever been out there in front of anybody.
And instead, what this is is Trump being who he has always been, and he's not going to take it from anybody.
And if anybody up there drives in these people on the stage were trying to hurt Trump the way he sees it, and he's not putting up with it.
He's not letting them get away with it.
And that's what's happening.
And believe you, me, Rush, there are a lot of people, and you're never gonna hear them in the media who are eating this up and wishing this is the kind of thing Republican candidates have done for a long time.
Now, I don't pretend to know how widely held a view like that is.
I don't doubt that some people do hold it.
I don't doubt that some people do think that this is not nearly as bad because it's the media and the Democrats in conjunction who are building this up and making it out to be what it is.
Once again, the media is defining our moral outrage for us.
The media is defining what we should be righteously indignant about.
The media is telling us what reprobates we are if we're not outraged by it.
And as such, this is how they they collate, if you will, public opinion, and then move it and shift it in the direction they want it to go.
But some people are not playing.
Some people don't care, they're immune to it, and they see it for what it is.
Okay, now even if that describes you, I would still maintain that it's perfectly fine if if Trump wants to conduct this campaign's a street fight, and I recognize that that's totally outside the bounds of normalcy that everybody's accustomed to, but I still don't think those two people are the target.
I still don't think there's a huge payoff for making them the target.
They're pawns.
They're not running for office.
You know, Mr. Kant, they've lost a child.
They lost a son in war.
There's no way you're ever going to gin up negative opinion about them.
You know, it's a risk to even parse what Mr. Khan said.
He said a lot of things that are not true in that speech.
He's waving his constitution around.
In that speech, he's implying that Trump wants to take your liberty away.
He's he's saying Trump wants to deny your freedom.
He he wants you to believe that there is no religious test, that it's unconstitutional to limit immigration in the country.
It's not at all.
We have a religious test.
I realize for some of you that may be a shock.
Why, that's that's that's that's that's religious profiling, Mr. Limbaugh.
We can't we do it all the time.
Let me give you the number one most frequently used case.
Such as now we have a series of wars in the Middle East.
We got a big one raging in Syria, civil war.
There are a lot of refugees from Syria.
They're fanning out all over Europe, and some of them are trying to come here.
And Obama and Hillary are welcoming them with open arms.
Now, in the past, people have applied for political asylum in this country, tens of thousands, and they do it every day.
And you know what one of the questions is?
What's your religion?
Oh, yes, it is.
Everyone until now, every up to now.
I don't know if it's the case now with Obama, but up to now, that was in the top five questions.
You know why?
It was the only way to determine if the applicant, if the refugee seeking asylum was actually fleeing someplace where there was religious persecution going on.
The only way you had to ask them their religion.
You had to get details from them, what was happening to them because of their religion.
It was part of whether or not they were granted status.
We do it all the time.
Uh Mr. Khan tried to imply that that uh Trump wants to ban all Muslims.
It's unconstitutional to do that, and that Trump wants to take your liberty and freedom away because he don't know what the Constitution is.
And I'm here to tell you Hillary Clinton's the only one who openly said she wants to limit your freedom.
She went after the First Amendment, that Citizens United reference.
She went up second amendment, I can't tell you how many times, and even if she didn't, you know what she wants to do with the second amendment.
She wants to take your gun away from you.
Don't care what she says.
Every Democrat running for office wants your gun.
And then she made a she took a hit at the Tenth Amendment by trying to limit states' liberty and freedom and various things.
Woman is a clear and present danger.
And thus should remain the target every day.
Just like the Washington Post story today that Hillary's making Trump the target, Hillary has decided because of this con business, that the most productive thing she can do is to continue to hammer at Trump and his unfitness, his unsuitability, his lack of qualifications, his ill temperament, whatever, ill-tempered temperament.
Well, I think the reason she's doing that is because she doesn't have a whole lot of reason to vote for her.
I mean, vote for her for the children, talk about an all cliché.
Vote for her because she cares, vote for her.
She doesn't have a record, folks.
She can't run on her record.
Nobody's happy with this economy.
She can't run on her foreign policy record.
It was a disaster, everybody knows it.
She can't, if she brings it up, Trump will nuke it.
And whoever his donors are in the packs running ads, she's got one choice, and that's to run against Trump.
It's nothing new, I think.
She's been doing it for weeks now.
But Trump's got to stop running against the cons.
And anybody else they trot forward to insult him.
But his nature, the guy is a New York street fighter.
You come after him, and he's going to go after you.
He's not going to turn the other cheek or look the other way.
And it is felt that he can be distracted because of this.
Here's uh here's Jim in Fairfax, Virginia.
I'm glad you waited, sir.
Great to have you on the program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you doing?
Very well.
Um the reason I called, I'm a just to set it out there, I'm a formerly pro-Trump, then a never Trump, and now I'm reluctantly kind of more drifting to the never Hillary camp.
And I I think Trump's biggest problem is in the beginning I liked him because he was against government, not particularly any one person.
And I think his personal tax started to get more and more part of his campaign, and I kind of pushed me away from him.
And I think he's got to, you know, like every Congress, everybody loves their congressman, but they hate Congress.
He's got to run against these all talk, no action politicians who take in trillions of dollars but still can't fix the VA.
I mean I think those kind of messages sing to me and to moderates and Democrats who may or may not like Hillary, but definitely don't like the government for whatever reason.
Let me go back to your timeline.
How did you say you started out you were pro-Trump or never Trump?
Pro Trump.
You were pro-Trump, then you went never Trump.
Yeah, almost.
I mean, I was I was dancing on never Trump because really irritating me.
Tell me the truth if you can remember it.
Don't tell me the truth about what was it that made you pro Trump out of the box?
It was his uh it was his pro-Americanism.
It was the look, you we're tired of losing, we're tired of these bad deals, we're tired of the unopen border, we're tired of these all talk, do nothing politicians.
I'm I'm a very political person.
I more of a cruise guy.
And I I read a lot of politics, watch not on news.
Um you know, in the beginning, it took me a like I wasn't pro-Trump instantly, like the day he announced.
Okay, kind of grew.
What point at what point did he lose you or begin to lose uh I think right about uh after South Carolina?
I mean, he I think with the with the the wives thing really kind of pushed way away.
Uh but it was happening before then.
It was just the too many insults.
I mean, uh I don't like the Lion Ted and the little Marco.
I think those are just a bridge to I think he that he would do even more.
Well, now wait, those were those are practically from the get go.
Ryan Lion Ted Little Marco.
I mean, those are probably from the get go.
Not quite the get go.
I mean, he didn't have the confidence in the beginning, I think, to do that stuff, and he just kept getting away with it, and he kept doing it more and more.
And his stump speech went from So uh can I infer to you don't like crooked Hillary.
No, I'm I'm all for crooked Hillary.
I'm a locker up Hillary from prison guy.
Okay.
I think Hillary's I think Hillary's terrible, but I don't think he needs to say that.
Everyone knows if you're anti-Hillary, you're anti-Hillary.
There's nothing he can say.
Okay, but now you're coming back, even despite the con business, you're coming back.
I mean, I can that was really bad.
I I wish I I I my problem is I just can't stand Hillary putting Supreme Court justices in.
I think that's I think Trump has problems, but I'm I'm comforted by Mike Pence.
I'm comforted that he'll put in more uh quality cabinet folks and that'll keep him.
Well, that's clearly that's that that's clearly uh important.
Uh it's it's and it's a worthy uh campaign issue uh reminder.
But look at all he's not talking about.
He's not talking about that.
Every every second he worries about this con business, he's not talking about it.
He's not talking about this dismal economic recovery.
And by the way, I got some more assistance I want to offer in this economic recovery business.
I think it's been going on so long.
I think the Democrats are fine with this.
I actually believe the Democrats have found a comfort level with this economy.
It keeps plenty of people in need.
It prevents the middle class from growing, which is key to the Democrats holding on to their constituency.
In a perverted way, it is.
They need people dependent.
The worst thing that can happen to a Democrat is to see a voter become self-reliant.
That's the worst thing.
And middle class people rising through the levels of middle class to upper middle class, they become less dependent.
That's why the Democrats love immigration, illegal, because it keeps a current flow of a permanent underclass flooding the country, which they need.
And I really believe they have found a comfort level with this economy.
They call it the new norm.
They're telling everybody to get used to it, that this is it, that the great burgeoning economies of the past were kind of phony.
You know, they were built on American excess.
They were built on America stealing from here and stealing from...
from there and mistreating people over there, and Obama's apologized for all that now.
So uh it's almost like they don't embrace this.
I mean, it's not like they run around and ballyhoo this.
But I don't think they believe in robust growth.
They don't talk about it, Hillary doesn't talk about it.
They talk about how great this is.
It's it's another way to hit them.
Criticize them, pound them, whatever.
Man, there's all kinds of vulnerabilities going on.
I mean, Hillary is loaded with them, but their names are not con.
By the way, folks, I meant to mention this in the first half hour of the program, because it's it's that important.
There's another reason why the drive-by's the Washington Post, Hillary, everybody focusing on Trump.
Now, look, don't misunderstand.
Trump has invited this.
I'm I'm this is this is I'm not trying to obfuscate here what has happened or change it anyway.
But there's there's a there are reasons for everything.
And this is big.
Are you aware that after the Democrat convention closed, that Hillary and uh the guy next door, your neighbor next door could be washing your car, Tim Kane, went on a big bus tour.
Are you aware of that?
You're not?
Oh yeah.
They loaded on the bus and they made a bunch of campaign stops.
And they went to Rust Belt places, Pennsylvania.
You haven't heard anything about that.
Are you kidding me?
You really haven't heard anything about that.
Well, you're not alone, because nobody showed up at them.
CNN, freepers, all kinds of tweeting left and right, nobody showed up.
They couldn't draw flies.
This is worse than Hillary's healthcare bus tour.
There are pictures of practically empty small venues.
You haven't heard of this, have you?
I'm asking you in the audience, not just people on the other side of the glass here.
Do you know that if these bus tours, and they did happen, I mean, Hillary and Tim King, they they they launched out there, and their intent was to spend a couple days of the weekend.
If there had been Trump-sized crowds, if there'd been one-third Trump-sized crowds, if there had been one-third Trump-style energy and passion, you would have heard nothing but that this weekend.
But you didn't hear it.
They didn't draw crowds.
They were promoted.
They didn't promote it nationally.
I mean, Hillary nor Cain said on stage, and we're gonna be in Scranton Wilkesbury tomorrow at two o'clock.
Can't wait.
They didn't do that.
But they're ground people, as they're called.
The advanced people, they went out to all these places, secured the venues, and let everybody locally know that the Clinton and Tim Cain appearance was going to happen, and it didn't draw very many people.
Like Hillary signing her book didn't draw very many people.
Uh I I think the fact that so few people even knew this was happening is testimony in and of itself.
And I what whatever you are feeling, listen, if if you're a Trumpster or a Trumpist, you've got to be foaming at the mouth or angry or depressed, or thinking you you had to think the Trump campaign was going to be the campaign that was going to overcome all this stuff, that was going to be able to withstand all this, that was not going to get caught or trapped by this, or if they were to be able to pound themselves back out of it and make the Democrats feel like uh mincemeat.
So you got to be down on the dumps.
They they purposely are trying to make you feel that way, they always do.
But you have to understand something.
Hillary Clinton is not considered royalty in this country by the she is not popular.
Hillary Clinton is not liked.
Her public opinion numbers are well indicative of people's awareness that she lies.
She has been forced on the Democrat Party.
And by the way, this all started in 2000.
The rigging of the Bernie Sanders campaign began in 2008.
It was part of the deal with Obama taking what was hers in 2008.
I've got to take a break.
I'm a little long.
We'll be back here.
Don't go away.
Okay, when we get back after our top of the hour obscene profit timeout, just a few lookbacks via audio soundbite, previous moments in the past here on the EIB network, and one of them is new.
It is uh from William F. Buckley Jr., fitting with the theme that Cookie established for these soundbites today.
Export Selection