Rush Limbaugh Program - July 28, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 28, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program

36:54

July 28, 2016, Thursday, Hour #1

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 Podcast.
	Okay, folks, was would somebody explain a few things to me?
	I really need some help in understanding things today.
	In the first place, I thought, as I was told, Barack Obama's speech last night was fabulous.
	It was just great.
	It was uplifting.
	It was positive.
	It was Reagan-esque.
	So why wasn't every Democrat in that convention hall last night angry and fit to be tied?
	That's not what they believe.
	Why weren't there mass protests over what the president?
	That's not who he is.
	He doesn't talk that way, except at election time.
	Republicans always have to face up to the fact that the Democrats are going to try to co-opt conservatism at election time.
	But why wasn't every Democrat in that place last night angry?
	That's not Barack Obama.
	That's not what he believes.
	That's not who he is, and there they are applauding it.
	But then my next question is this.
	If it's such a great speech, if it was so wonderful.
	It was so, so magnanimous.
	It passed the torch.
	It set up Hillary.
	It was it just hit on all silver.
	Why nobody talking about it today?
	I can't find anybody talking.
	You know what they're still talking about Trump?
	They're talking about Trump and a joke he told yesterday about the Russians finding Hillary's missing emails.
	Let me ask you a question about that.
	Why are they so upset about that?
	When do they start caring about national security?
	When do they start caring about treason?
	They're talking about Trump maybe committing treason, violing national security.
	When did the Democrats start worrying about that?
	And before you think that I'm going off a deep end, are these not the people to open borders and letting anybody and everybody from any war-torn ISIS dominated area of the world come into this country unchecked?
	Aren't these the people that tell us we are not to see what we see when we see crime when we see terrorism?
	And yet all of a sudden these people are that they're obsessed with what Donald Trump said because somehow he's putting America at risk.
	He's somehow sidling up to Russia.
	Barack Obama is the man who told Dmitry Medvedev, hey Dimitri, tell Vladimir, just relax.
	I'll have a lot more flexibility after I win re-election next month.
	That was in 2012.
	It was Hillary with this massive stupid red button toy reset button with the Russians.
	But seriously, why?
	Donald Trump is still hijacked Tuesday night at the Democrat convention.
	He hijacked last night at the Democrat convention.
	He's still dominating news coverage today.
	Would somebody explain to me why they care?
	I mean, if Trump was so off the wall, if Trump was so irresponsible, if Trump had done something that is essentially self-defeating, if Trump is this, if this, and this is what they're saying and hoping, if this was the big Trump implosion that everybody has been waiting for since last July, then why are they still talking about it?
	Why are they so upset about it?
	I'll tell you, I'm gonna answer all of my questions.
	But the answer to the last question, they know full well that what Trump said is profoundly effective in defining who they are and who Hillary Clinton is, and what all of the controversy and scandal that swirls around her is all about.
	Trump just continually reminds everybody that she is not the woman portrayed at the Democrat National Convention.
	That speech last night, I mean, taken in its own cocoon and bubble, I guess you could say it's a great speech, but it doesn't relate to anything real.
	That's not who Obama is, and it's not what he really thinks.
	And if that let me tell you something, if Obama had been the last eight years in word and policy, as he was in that speech last night, we wouldn't have a prayer.
	If Obama had been what he was last night for eight for the last eight years, there would be no Republican Party.
	He would have everybody.
	If he had governed the way he says he believed last night, there wouldn't be a Republican Party today because every Republican would have signed on with it.
	Because it was the conservative Republican Reagan agenda spelled out for the most part, I mean, exceptions to everything here.
	But that's not who Obama is.
	Obama is Mr. Apology tour.
	Obama is the guy who thinks America's founding was unjust and immoral.
	He doesn't he doesn't relish it.
	He doesn't cherish it.
	Obama resents it, and he's made this perfectly clear his entire political life.
	And those Democrats that were cheering last night, they're gonna need therapy, because they're not gonna know which is which.
	Well, that's not true.
	They do know which is which.
	They were only applauding that last night because they but this ought to even tick them off.
	If there's they gotta be saying to themselves, if this is what we have to say to win, if this is what we have to do to win, of course they don't care, they'll do anything to win.
	But for some of their true believers, this had to be the Twilight Zone last night.
	Then you go to the media, and this they're just obsessed with with Trump.
	Uh I I they they just are beside themselves with this.
	Trump has endangered American national security.
	Trump is close to having committed treason.
	Seriously, I'm not I'm not just trying to be outrageous for the sake of it, which I never do, by the way.
	When all of a sudden did they start caring about this?
	These are the people with unsecured servers.
	These are the people whose servers have been hacked by the Russians, the Democrat National Committee, the Department of Justice, the Department of Defense, the Chicons, the Russians are attacking our cyber connections, every cyber networks, and they've succeeded.
	And it's only common sense to assume that they hacked Hillary's private server in the basement of Chappaqua.
	Now I'm going to try to explain this.
	What Trump did and what he meant.
	Again, I did yesterday.
	I was the first to properly characterize this as sarcasm.
	You know, this is what Trump was doing was vintage EIB, illustrating absurdity by being absurd.
	Okay, so what's the absurdity here?
	Huh?
	You can't name just one.
	Let's go down the list.
	Hillary Clinton had 60,000 emails.
	She says on a private server she set up, which we now know was against guidelines and was probably a violation of the law in the basement of her home in Champaqua.
	And we know that she did this to escape any kind of scrutiny and to avoid having to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests.
	And she did this to hide activity which we already know she was engaged in, and that is selling her future presidency to foreign donors to the tune of a hundred million dollars or more via the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative.
	She was selling access.
	She didn't want there to be any proof of it.
	She wanted no way anybody to be able to prove this.
	That's why it didn't happen to the State Department on their servers.
	Okay, so there's 60,000 emails.
	And when we learn of the server, and people go, oh my God, what's going on there?
	Is national security at risk?
	Legitimate question in this case.
	Democrats told us at the time, no, no, no, there's no national security concern here.
	We're talking Hillary Clinton, she's just a superpatriate.
	There's nothing to worry about.
	In fact, Hillary's gonna go through all those emails, and she's gonna turn over the relevant ones in the State Department.
	Which meant about 30,000 were turned over, and the other 30,000, they are gone, folks.
	It's key.
	This is key to understanding all of this.
	Those 30,000 emails are gone and the service gone's been wiped.
	Remember when somebody asked Hillary in the media, well, what did you wipe the server?
	Oh, you mean with a cloth?
	She said, Sarah Palin-esque.
	So they're gone.
	But we're told there was nothing to see Anyway, which is why they're gone.
	They have nothing to do with anything but yoga lessons and Chelsea's uh matrimonial configurations, such as the rehearsal dinner and the wardrobe and the registration and all these other things.
	It just would be boring to anybody to see, and Mrs. Clinton wanted to spare us all that, so he just dumped those.
	But then since all of that happened, we've had the FBI director come out and basically say that everything Hillary Clinton did here is suspicious, that much of it is illegal, and that the only reason she wasn't prosecuted is that they couldn't find any evidence of intent, but they found all kinds of evidence of negligence and so forth.
	She was clearly trying to hide things.
	There are 30,000 emails.
	There are hacks that we know have taken place all over the place.
	And so the assumption is that her server among all these various servers would have been the easiest to hack.
	There have been requ repeated efforts for years to get to the bottom of this.
	And every effort has been met with a stonewall by the Obama administration and ultimately the FBI and the Department of Justice.
	And we're treated to a press conference by Director Comey of the FBI, where he basically listed what would have been on an indictment had she been charged.
	And she could have been and should have been, but wasn't because they couldn't find any intent.
	The real reason she wasn't charged is the FBI director didn't want it on his head.
	He didn't want to be the one person to take action that would have eliminated a major party's presidential candidate.
	His view was the voters should do this.
	He didn't even want to go there.
	But he made it clear in that press conference that there is illegality piled on illegality, piled on suspicion.
	It just kept piling up, and everything about this creates more and more questions, all related to what?
	National security.
	Now moving forward to the timeline, we then learn the Democrat National Committee servers have been hacked.
	And it is WikiLeaks that releases the evidence, the emails that have been hacked, and we found out that the Democrat National Committee was working to deny crazy Bernie Sanders the Democrat nomination.
	We learned the Democrat Party had rigged its primary.
	We knew it because the evidence was clear day to day when they were scheduling debates on Saturday nights when nobody watches Crazy Bernie winning state after state after state, and yet Hillary's delegate count increasing after every loss.
	And we had the superdelegates, so we knew the fix was in.
	We knew that this was going to be a Hillary coronation.
	We knew that Bernie Sanders was never ever going to be the nominee, but his supporters didn't.
	His supporters thought it was legit.
	His supporters thought he was on the way to winning.
	His supporters thought he could have.
	His supporters vastly preferred him to her.
	But then we all learned that Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and the rest of the DNC were rigging the game to guarantee Bernie Sanders would lose.
	How did we learn this?
	We learn it from a hack.
	Who were we told was responsible for this?
	Vladimir Putin and the Russians.
	So we're just sitting here minding our own business.
	And we are absorbing what we're being told by the media and by the Democrats and by the regime.
	And that is that the Russians had hacked the DNC, all these cyber experts, paper after paper, blog post after blog post, story after story.
	Suggests that it was the Russians who did this, and the Russians left evidence, maybe some of it on purpose, maybe some of it accidental.
	We were told there were two different Russian cyber teams leaving evidence.
	We were told of Goosefer 2.0, Goosefer 1.0 original hacker from Romania.
	We were told that Goosefer 2.0 was actually a creation by the Russians to deflect attention from them.
	But we knew, we knew it was the Russians.
	So far, Donald Trump hadn't said a word here About what we all know.
	We know what we know because of the drive-by media, the Democrat Party, and the regime.
	The Russians hacked the DNC server, and the hack produced emails that showed they rigged the game of their own primary.
	Donald Trump hadn't had a word to say about it.
	He hasn't, at this point, had anything to do with it.
	Well, he's commented on it, like we all have.
	But he's got no culpability here.
	He was not involved in helping the DNC stack the deck against Crazy Bernie.
	He just commented on it as it was happening, because we all with common sense could see it.
	But the questions persist.
	Hillary says there aren't any more emails to produce.
	She says there's nothing to see anyway because they're all personal.
	She destroyed them.
	She destroyed the server.
	No one else seems interested in discovery despite all the hacks of the DOD, the DOJ, the DNC.
	But people do want to know what she destroyed.
	She's running for president.
	What was on there?
	Is she selling access?
	How does she get a hundred million dollars in a charitable foundation from foreign governments?
	How does that happen?
	Could the evidence be on what she destroyed?
	Gee, I we need to see what's in those emails.
	We really need to find out.
	She's running for president.
	So Trump suing his press conference yesterday gets questions and questions on this and the emails, and he finally, knowing everything I just said to you, knowing that everybody and their uncle in the United States has said, oh, sorry, we can't find those emails.
	They're gone, they're destroyed.
	But we know there have been hacks.
	They've told us the DNC told us they were hacked by the Russians.
	So we know the Russians are out there hacking Democrat servers and networks.
	It's a common sense connection.
	There's 30,000 emails, Hillary destroyed in a server.
	Trump keeps getting questions about this.
	So Trump says, hey, grab audio soundbite number seven.
	Given everything I've just told you, I've just put it all in context for you.
	And what we're told is utter BS.
	You shouldn't be interested.
	There's nothing there.
	It's all private.
	It's none of your business.
	You should trust Hillary.
	She went through their 60,000 emails.
	She only sent over what was of interest, the 30,000 she deleted, none of your business.
	It was all personal.
	So we've exhausted every possible way domestically.
	We've exhausted every chance.
	We have to find out what was on those emails on that server.
	Despite the fact we need to know we have nowhere else to go.
	Comey says there's nothing to see, nothing to find, it's not there.
	FBI, number one law enforcement.
	So Trump says, you know what, maybe.
	I will tell you this.
	Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.
	I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.
	Let's see if that happens.
	There you go, right there, which they're not playing the tail into that bite today, all over Network TV.
	They're leaving that.
	By the way, the media might be rewarded.
	The media's covering it up, which is the point of the comment.
	It's a pointed, sarcastic way to illustrate that we're still being misled, still being lied to, and nothing in America could be trusted.
	Maybe the Russians know.
	They did the hack, right?
	Maybe the Russians can find it.
	It was a brilliant sarcastic comment that made a point, and that's why they're run ragged by it.
	We got Dinesh D'Suzak coming up in the next segment, talking about his movie Hillary's America and some of the things we've heard of to date at the at the convention.
	I'll tell you something else that happened.
	The Democrat and media reaction to Trump's sarcastic comment, and it's the epitome of sarcasm parody.
	Well, you know, if the br if the greatest minds in America, and one of the greatest political parties can't answer the question, maybe the Russians have the answers.
	I mean, they did the hacking.
	Maybe the Russians tell.
	Maybe the Russians isn't telling Russia can tell the media.
	Oh, but wait, the media, they wouldn't be interested in that.
	That's the media's part of the cover up here.
	But what what you know what happened here as a result of this?
	The Democrats, in their eagerness to respond to Trump, because they thought that this is the Trump implosion.
	This is the gaff.
	This is the one that's going to make everybody realize that Trump's not qualified and ought not even be running.
	They inadvertently admitted that there are national security details on these 30,000 emails that Hillary threw away.
	And I wonder if they're actually gone.
	Thrown away and so forth.
	But it's clear to me that the reason everybody's going crazy over this is because Trump has once again exposed the lying and the untrustworthiness of all the people on the left involved in this.
	That's why they can't let go of this.
	If it's that if it if Trump's really stepped in it, let him live in it, you know.
	Let it but they are overdoing it as they always do, because they're bothered by it.
	Half my brain tied behind my back, just to make it fair.
	We uh we welcome back to the program, Dinesh DeSouza movie producer and director extraordinaire.
	Hillary's America.
	What you just won uh not an award, but you've just achieved some of the highest grossing uh what what's the category that you just Rush it's it's absolutely fantastic.
	We uh became in just five days, we uh we uh became the most successful political documentary of of this year, twenty sixteen, and we've also become we've entered the top ten documentaries of all time in just five days.
	Right.
	But this movie, it's a documentary, but it's entertaining as it can be.
	It it's it's not stiff by any means.
	If there's one thing that if if you're talking to people who haven't seen the movie, and there's one thing in this movie or one s one one area that you really want people to take away from it, what is it?
	What would it be?
	Well, Rush, as you know, four years ago I made the movie about Obama, and my point about Obama was that he's an ideologue.
	He's an anti-colonial ideologue who wants to diminish the wealth and power of America.
	I think with the Clintons, we're dealing with something different.
	We're dealing with Bonnie and Clyde, a kind of criminal racket that these two people run, and they've been on the make since the Arkansas days, uh, continuing through the White House, then Hillary renting out American foreign policy.
	And so I think Hillary's goal, very different than Obama's, is kind of to be the crime boss of America.
	Uh she wants to run America kind of the way that Al Capone would like to run Chicago.
	If you think about what Al Capone's objectives were, he wanted to basically have full access to the city treasury, hand out contracts to all his buddies.
	He wanted to be able to dominate the place, and if people criticized him to push him off or snuff him out, and he wanted to be able to walk into the big Chicago stadium and have everyone shout with cult-like enthusiasm, Big Al, big Al, big Al.
	And that's basically the twisted ambition of Hillary Clinton.
	Well, but yet she is ideological, Denis.
	I mean, she I mean, she does have ideological designs.
	You know, which I'm saying, that the reason that she likes the progressive ideology is it delivers power right back to her.
	In other words, if she lived in a country of limited government where the where the federal government had limited power, how could she acquire all this money and power for herself?
	So she likes the progressive ideology because it serves her racketeering objectives.
	Well, I do know uh that both she and her husband have been obsessed with money and wealth from the day they got married.
	They they didn't have any all the people they hung around with were were very wealthy and they felt inadequate and insecure, and it's been an obsession, it's what Whitewater was about, and pretty much everything else that they have done.
	So the the movie's out, it's it's drawing uh record crowds and it's it's making just tremendous impressions on people.
	What what do you you've you you produced the movie, you know it intimately, and you're watching a Democrat convention.
	I imagine it's a frustrating thing for you.
	Well, it's beautiful to have the movie come out just this week because it is such a powerful counter-narrative to all the nonsense that we're hearing out of Philadelphia.
	The Democrats keep saying we're the party of the little guy and the ordinary man, and we're the party of Latinos and immigrants and blacks.
	And part of what we show in the movie is that the Democratic Party is actually the party of slavery, of segregation, of Jim Crow, of the Ku Klux Klan, of lynching, of forced sterilization, sympathy for fascism in the nineteen thirties.
	The Democrats are the ones who interned the Japanese Americans after World War Two.
	So unbelievably, this Democratic Party has been implicated in the most sordid and hynous acts of history, and yet in a move of unbelievable jujitsu, what they do is they take all their crimes and blame them on the South, or blame them on the Republicans, or blame them on America, as if America did this or America did that, but America didn't do it, the Democrats did.
	Well, now let you you you ran through that list pretty quickly, and I know you don't want to give away the entire movie here, but there's a couple things I don't want to gloss over.
	You uh you link the KKK to the Democrat Party.
	You link segregation Jim Crow laws to the Democrat Party.
	Do you realize if you took a survey of the American people, that that would stun them.
	And most people wouldn't believe that.
	I'm curious uh to know how you figure that out, where you went to learn that, how it's documented in the movie, and what your audience's reaction to this is because that's big.
	It's huge.
	Sir Rush, I think this is the power of the movie.
	It completely disrupts and discombobulates the democratic narrative.
	Now, it is a fact that it was a democratic delegate to the Democratic National Convention, Nathan Bedford Forrest, who founded the Ku Klux Klan.
	It is also a fact that the Klan had a massive revival in the early twentieth century due to a progressive Democratic president Woodrow Wilson screening a pro Ku Klux Klan movie in the White House.
	It is also a fact, and here I'm quoting the progressive historian Eric Foner, that for thirty years the Ku Klux Klan was the domestic terrorist arm of the Democratic Party in this country.
	So these are the irrefutable facts of history.
	And what is great is to see all these left wing critics thrashing about and screaming about the movie, but they can't find a single fact in it, or in my accompanying book of the same title, Hillary's America, they can't find one thing that is even arguable, let alone wrong.
	Have you watched the Democrat Convention night after night this week?
	It has been uh both an amusing and nauseating and a hilarious sight.
	I mean, to see Bill Clinton, that old scoundrel delivering this kind of highly edited uh introduction to Hillary to listening to Obama last night.
	Uh I mean it's quite a spectacle.
	I don't know if you know Raj, but I sneak my own way into the Democratic Convention, actually got right on the floor.
	Uh and I wish I could actually play the trailer or play my movie in that convention, because they would need ambulances outside if I did that.
	Yeah, well, they throw you back in jail, too.
	They they'd come up with a reason to do that.
	I mean, uh Denish, can she live up to all this that has been said about her tonight?
	She this is this.
	I mean, they can say they can say all they want about the great things Obama said about her and the great things that Biden have said, the great things that Bill Clinton said about it, but they're not on the ballot.
	She is.
	And she did not win in two thousand eight.
	She was overshadowed by Obama.
	She is the one who has to convince people to vote for it.
	Now these surrogates are not going to be able to make people vote for her.
	Can she live up to all of this tonight?
	You have to have a pretty decent understanding of her, having produced this movie and written the book.
	Yes, I think it's going to be tough for her because really she has known from from early life that she does not have the gregariousness or the politically magnetic skills of Bill.
	She has actually needed Bill more than he needs her.
	Because after all, Bill is kind of her pitch man.
	He's the one who actually carried her into national politics.
	Well, yeah.
	Without him, she'd be nowhere.
	You know, that's that's an interesting point, too, because we hear all this talk about the glass ceiling and how Hillary is broken down barrier.
	She hasn't if her last name wasn't Clinton, we wouldn't know who she is.
	She certainly wouldn't be running for president.
	So you could you can, I think, honestly fairly say that that she has piggybacked on her husband's name and his success and to get where she is, and much of this is actually a payback to her for preserving his career and the Democrat Party by standing by him when he was enmeshed in all of his uh messes, shall we say.
	This is a really good point, Rush, that she is actually known about not only Bill's infidelities, but his sexual predation.
	She's known about this from the early Years, but she realized that if she became his fixer or her or his enabler, that this would in a sense glue him to her.
	He would depend on her for to be able to continue to operate in this manner.
	And so this is actually kind of a partnership in crime.
	You may say that the family that steals together stays together.
	Dinesh de Souza of Hillary's America.
	What I'm sure that uh people challenge your motives and question your motives because of the uh conservative background you have.
	What would you what do you say to people who ask you, why are you doing this?
	What why why why movie on Hillary?
	Obviously, you don't want it to win the election, but why are you doing this?
	Why are you going into this much?
	Rush, uh, I'm um I'm, as they say, a person of color.
	I'm a brown-skinned immigrant of the United States.
	I was born in Bombay, India.
	I grew up in a country that's ruled by gangs.
	You saw a hint of it in Slumdog Millionaire.
	That uh this is a country with corruption running all the way through it.
	You can't get through the day without paying bribes.
	It makes you feel dirty at the end of the day.
	I came to America to live a different kind of life and to experience the American dream.
	No other country has a dream.
	There's no Indian dream, there's no French dream, there's no Chinese dream.
	This is a country where you can start out at the bottom, and if you climb up the ladders of opportunity, you're going to get ahead.
	So my politics is based on that, and that's what I'm fighting for.
	And these twisted people like Obama and Hillary represent a grave threat to that American dream, and that's why I make these movies, and that's why I write these books, and that's why I want to be a part of the fight, whether they lock me up or not.
	So what do you think when you hear Obama last night try to do his impression of Ronald Reagan?
	It's unbelievable to listen to this preposterous rhetoric.
	You know, I was actually reading a book by the historian Kenneth Stamp, and it's about the old slave plantation.
	And he was talking about the different features of the slave plantation.
	He talks about the fact that you have, for example, broken families, ramshackle dwellings, a high degree of violence necessary to hold the place together.
	Everybody gets a meager provision of life, but nobody gets ahead.
	there's nihilism, there's despair.
	And I thought to myself, wow, it sounds like the guy is describing inner city Oakland or Detroit or Chicago.
	These are the urban plantations that Obama and Hillary have created.
	They depend on them to deliver votes for them.
	And so, in a sense, history isn't dead.
	One of the reasons I include history in my books and movies is we're living it out today, and many of the themes of the old rural plantation, the Democrats have recreated, not just for blacks, but for immigrants.
	They've created barrios, ghettos, and slums, and they're responsible for it.
	There's no Republicans around.
	It's Democratic mayors, Democratic school superintendents, Democrats all the way down.
	This is the miserable bigoted legacy of this Democratic Party.
	It really is hideous the way they keep people dependent, the way they keep people poor, the way uh all the while promising them paradise, promising them salvation, promising them emancipation, and they themselves keep them barely subsisting and in a state of dependence for the purposes of maintaining and acquiring their own power.
	It's amazing how they've gotten away with it.
	And I hope as many people as possible can see your movie because your movie exposes exactly what they're up to and how they've gotten away.
	What they have been able to do in reversing true history regarding race, racism, and so forth uh back in the 40s, 50s, 60s in this country, and how they've been so easily able to transfer all that to the Republican Party is nothing short of breathtaking.
	Ru Rush, if you'll let me, the website for the movie is just Hillary's America, the movie dot com.
	Right.
	We're playing in twelve hundred theaters, so people can enter the zip code, and it'll tell you exactly where the movie is playing near you.
	Hillary's America the Movie dot com is the website.
	Dinesh, thanks for your time and and continued uh best of fortune, good luck with this.
	It's a it's a tremendous production, and it's eye-opening in terms of upsetting so much of what people think is uh conventional wisdom.
	And I'll tell you what's gonna happen.
	You're gonna watch this, and one of the one of the main questions folks are gonna have is why have the Republicans allowed this to happen?
	Why haven't the Republicans why is it not until now, Dinesh de Sousa in his movie?
	Why is it taken so long for an effort to tell the truth?
	The KKK is the Democrat Party.
	The KKK has always been the Democrat Party.
	The mayors and the police chiefs that were denying civil rights.
	The Martin Luther King protesters were marching against Democrat segregationists.
	And yet, until this movie, there has been no concerted effort to tell the truth about this.
	Dinesh DeSouza, we'll be right back, folks, after this.
	Don't go away.
	You want to hear what the real Democrat Party is.
	We had Obama's speech last night, and honestly, folks.
	That's not who Barack Obama is.
	That's not what Barack Obama thinks, and it's not how Barack Obama has governed.
	And I'm just going to tell you again, have he governed and implemented policies based on the beliefs he espoused last night.
	A bunch of things would be different.
	We would not have an unemployment problem.
	We would not have a nation with 94 million Americans not working.
	We would have a growing economy.
	We would already have a legitimate recovery from the recession.
	Something else that would have happened, if Obama really believed what he said last night and had implemented policies based on it, we wouldn't have had all this negative talk for seven and a half years about how devastating that recession was, because it wasn't.
	It wasn't a near financial collapse.
	That was all BS.
	It was a recession.
	It was an economic downturn, but it was not the end of the world like they portrayed.
	But Obama has portrayed it to be so negative and so bad that not even he, and Bill Clinton said this four years ago.
	I couldn't have done any better what Obama's done.
	They wanted you to think that was near death.
	It was all and that's the excuse for Obama not having fixed it.
	He's still trying.
	He never gets the blame for any of it.
	He deserves the blame for every economic aspect of life in this country today.
	He owns it all.
	He has implemented policies, Obamacare being policy implementation number one designed to stifle the American economy.
	There would not have been Obamacare if he believed what he said last night.
	He would have never implemented it.
	He would have never proposed it.
	He would have never suggested it or talked about it.
	That's how off the beaten path that speech was last night.
	It's very typical of Democrats, however, when they think they're in trouble, and Hillary's in trouble.
	Her unfavorables, her untrustworthiness, sixty-eight percent.
	And the speakers this week have not moved that number.
	Trump's lead has increased a little in pretty much every poll every day this week.
	If Obama really had believed all that he said last night, if he had implemented policies that he had said last night, the Republican Party would seriously be searching for reasons to exist.
	Because Obama would have co-opted the Republican Party.
	If Obama had actually talked the last eight years, like he talked last night, if he had implemented policies like he suggested, he would not have won re-election in 2004 running as a Democrat.
	Or 2012 running as a Democrat.
	I mean, that's how extraordinary this was.
	The optimism alone.
	Obama is not optimistic.
	The Democrat Party is defined by its vision of dystopia.
	They want it, they thrive on it.
	They live and breathe it because in dystopia, people turn to government for their very existence.
	If the country's doing so well, why do we need a change maker?
	What's all this about Hillary being the best change maker Bill Clinton's ever seen?
	Why do we need change?
	My God, if things are going so damn well, why do we need change?
	You want to know who the real Democrat Party is?
	Here's Nancy Pelosi on NPR this news hour last night.
	Judy Woodruff.
	Right now, Donald Trump is doing much better than Hillary Clinton among white men, particularly white men who have not attended college.
	How does Hillary Clinton counter that, Ms. Pelosi?
	I think that so many times white um non-college education, educated white males have uh voted Republican, they voted against their own economic interest because of guns, because of gays, and because of God.
	The three Gs, God being the woman's right to choose.
	There you that's the real Democrat Party.
	And by the way, these white, uneducated, uncollege educated guys used to be Democrat, used to be central to the Democrat coalition.
	White working class male voters.
	In 2011, they finally said we don't care about them, we don't want them, we're gonna go for the minorities, and they've done so.
	That's your real Democrat Party.
	And Obama agrees.
	That's just her version of the bitter clingers.
	Oh, yeah, yeah.
	I got some comments on Biden.
	I got some comments on all of this.
	It's painful.
	Folks, it's it I told you yesterday, it's really painful watching this.
	Because you realize that so many Americans are eating it up.

▲