All Episodes
Previous Next
May 10, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:17
May 10, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, music lovers, thrill seekers, and conversationalists all across the fruited plain, Rushlinbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone.
Great to have you today.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushbo at EIBnet.com.
There's an NBC News Survey Monkey poll that's out as well.
This is not to be confused with the NBC Wall Street Journal poll.
This is the NBC News survey monkey poll.
And in this poll, now wait a minute here.
Wait, what, what, what?
Wait just a second.
Let me sometimes things are more confusing than they need to be.
And I am on the verge of exploding here.
I've been surrounded by incompetence the last 24 hours that I'm having trouble dealing with.
Let me okay.
It is NBC News Survey Monkey Poll.
It was released.
Is this Tuesday?
It's Tuesday.
It feels like Friday already.
So in this poll, Trump is down only by five to Mrs. Clinton.
It's funny, you know how the gap is closing now that Trump is the presumptive nominee.
And all these people on the left, well, everywhere in the establishment, too, on the Republican side, are scratching their heads, and there's degrees of disbelief or panic at every stage.
The fact that Donald Trump is the presumptive nominee of the party scares voters more than it surprises them, according to an NBC News survey monkey poll released today.
47% of respondents said their reaction to Trump becoming the presumptive nominee was fear.
Just 26% said they were hopeful, while another 21% said they were angry, and 16% said they were surprised.
35% of respondents would be scared to see Hillary Clinton win the debt.
See, this is the thing.
When you strip all this away, Trump is only five points behind Hillary in this.
So how does this jibe anyway?
47% of respondents said the reaction to Trump becoming a nomination is fear.
Becoming a nominee is fear.
35% of the respondents say the same thing about Hillary.
So that's a spread of 18 points.
But what does that matter when Trump is only five points behind her when you strip all of this away?
35% of respondents would be scared to see Hillary win the Democrat nomination.
29% would be hopeful.
22% would be angry.
7% would be surprised.
The former Secretary of State tops Bernie Sanders in the national poll by 12 points among Democrats and Democrat leading voters.
So I don't know.
You look at all this stuff and you realize how much of it is used to shape public opinion rather than reflect it.
It's just mind-boggling.
Fred Barnes, who is the partner of William Crystal at the Weekly Standard.
Bill Crystal, of course, out there desperately trying to maintain what he believes is his control over the Republican Party by attempting to find a third party candidate that would do well enough to deny both Hillary and Trump 270 electoral votes and thus throw the election to the House of Representatives.
Fred Barnes at the Weekly Standard is a partner.
They're partnered up over there of Crystal.
And Barnes has a piece out today called He'll Do It His Way.
And his basic thrust here is if anybody's expecting Donald Trump to change now that he is the presumptive Republican nominee, forget it.
Trump says he can act presidential anytime he wants to, but that that time rarely comes and that there's reason for it.
Trump equates being presidential with being boring.
And being boring is not his style.
Trump will give a few speeches on major issues with presidential level trappings, teleprompters, prepared texts, invited audiences.
In fact, he's preparing one on the Supreme Court now.
Others are likely to focus on infrastructure and the scandals at the VA.
But that's about it in the boring department.
No effort is being drawn up to create a new Trump akin to the new Nixon 50 years ago.
When Trump learned that Paul Manafort, his convention chief and top advisor, had talked to Republican officials about a change in his style, he nicks the idea instantly and demoted Manafort and re-elevated Corey Lewandowski over when Manafort was running around trying to assure him, don't worry, this is all an act.
And when we get it sewn up, you're going to see major transformations in Mr. Trump and you're going to see much more presidential behavior.
And Trump heard that and blew a Trump gasket.
And Manafort has been demoted.
He did not look at it that way, but he has.
And then Corey Lewandowski has been re-elevated back to a position of prominence.
But he's going to do the formal stuff.
Newt Gingrich says, yeah, look, there are going to be some of these formal speeches.
You have to.
You got to do some tradition now and then.
Those things represent the positive Trump, said Newt Gingrich, an unofficial advisor.
But it's the negative Trump that'll get more attention.
He's very good at shrinking his opponents, Gingrich said.
This is a long way around this Fred Barnes trying to tell you if you, I don't know what his point is.
I think his point is: if you are afraid of Trump, but hoping that this is an act and hoping he's going to become more substantive and hoping he's going to become more presidential.
Forget it.
He is who he is and he's not going to change.
And I have to think Fred Barnes is not happy with that, being the partner of Bill Crystal at the weekly standard, Bill Crystal desperately trying to hold on to his control in his mind of the Republican Party.
AP, the ever-hopeful, the ever-hopeful AP, a top advisor from Senator Ted Cruz's presidential campaign, wants supporters to push a conservative agenda, including limits on the bathrooms that transgender people can use at this summer's Republican National Convention.
Anti-Trump forces see the Republican platform as a place to make a stand in Cleveland.
Now, there will be 2,472 delegates at the Republican convention.
They all have to approve the platform before formally anointing the presidential nominee.
And all the delegates, including those chosen to support Trump, can vote however they want on the platform.
And many conservatives say that they will use that vote to try to keep Trump from reshaping GOP dogma against abortion for free trade and on other issues.
So the platform committee, the platform writing is where conservatives, according to the AP now, are going to make a stand against Trump and try to hold on to the, I don't know what is the identity of the Republican Party.
My wild guess is that I don't think Trump is going to give a rat's rear end about the party platform.
I think nobody remembers what the platform is anyway once the thing is over.
And I'll tell you something.
The platform does not bind any Republican.
The platform is routinely a PR move where the party can establish what it stands for and publish it and put it out.
But no candidate, no nominee is ever bound by it.
And it is an insignificant part of any convention, which is why I think a big deal is being made of conservatives, whoever they are here, discussed as cruise supporters, circling the wagons and doing their best to keep the party defined as whatever Trump isn't.
But Trump's going to look at it, my guess, platform schmatform.
I mean, I don't care what they're, let them have it, let them do whatever they want at the platform.
Say whatever they want.
It's not going to affect me.
I'm going to run around and do what I do, and I'm going to be who I am, and I'm going to propose what I propose.
I'm going to support what I support, whatever platform says.
Because Trump's the guy out there saying, we don't need unity, the Republican Party.
We don't need you.
I don't have to be bound by it.
Trump is basically sniffing and rejecting every playbook tradition, or pretty much everyone.
All these canards about party unit.
I'm sure he'd love it if the party would come together, but it's not going to, he's not going to allow it to affect what he does if the party doesn't.
But they're clearly, folks, there's a, I don't think the right, the correct analysis of what Paul Ryan is doing has as yet, but maybe it has.
I haven't been able to check everything.
But Paul Ryan immediately saying he's not yet prepared to endorse Trump.
This is battle lines being drawn over who runs the Republican Party.
And I'm telling you, Paul Ryan represents the establishment.
And what this is, this refusal to endorse Trump, is the establishment continuing to say, I don't care who our nominee is.
We run this party.
I don't care who the nominee is.
This party's going to be ours.
Whatever happens, this nominee, win or lose, we still run the establishment.
We still run this party.
We still determine what's what about this party.
The conventional wisdom is that at some point, Ryan's going to have to endorse Trump.
If for no other reason, if he wins, there's going to have to be some show of, well, if not unity, some mutual understanding.
I'm not sure that any conventional wisdom is applicable anymore.
I think so much of what's happening here is so unexpected and unprecedented that there are not a lot of people who know really what to do with it.
Everybody has their formulaic ways of applying whatever event happens day to day in politics and plugging it into previous occurrences and thus analyzing it that way.
But it's largely uncharted water here, uncharted territory where everybody is headed.
You know, Pat Buchanan had this column just excoriating Ryan.
Who the hell does he think he is?
Does he not realize he just had his hat handed to him?
Does he not realize it?
What in the name of Sam Hill's going on?
The nominee, Donald Trump, got more votes than any Republican ever, and Ryan's saying, no, I don't think so.
It's not up to Trump to move to Ryan.
It's up to Ryan to move to Trump.
And if Ryan doesn't, then bye-bye Ryan.
That's Buchanan's column.
Folks, they're applauding my analysis, interpretation of the Buchanan column on the other side of the glass here.
Okay.
Well, anyway, the battle lines are drawn.
And these stands to reason, the establishment types are just not going to let the will of the people break up their club.
They're just not going to let that happen.
They're going to do everything they can to hold on to this.
Stands to reason that they would.
Anyway, get back to more of your phone calls after another obscene profit break.
Hang in there.
Be right back before you know it.
Buchanan's piece was titled, Who Promoted Private Ryan?
And the subhead is, Losers Don't Make Demands, They Make Pleas, They Make Requests.
You know, I said the other day in this program, Snerdley, you frowned at me.
I said, it's not up to the winner to move to the loser.
The loser has to get with the program, move to the winner.
And you looked at me like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
What do you mean was shocking when I said that?
It's the way of the world.
We shellacked the Japanese of World War II.
Did they tell us the way things are going to be at the signing ceremony?
No, we told them what they were going to have to do.
We did the same thing the Germans after World War II.
It's always the winners.
That's the reason that you get into conflict.
The winner determines the rules, and it's up to the loser to accede.
That's part of surrendering, and it's part of losing.
Now, you can go into exile if you want, but you don't start making demands.
But see, that's kind of what's wrong with America today.
The losers are making demands.
The oddballs, the kooks are the ones making the demands, and the winners are turning tail and running.
The winners are going, okay, okay.
Okay, just don't say beat things about it.
Just leave our kids alone.
So the losers are running a show.
And the losers are the left.
I mean, they're a definite minority in this country, but they're winning everything by virtue of the actual winners and majority giving up and surrendering and caving.
And frankly, I'm worn out with it.
This bathroom business in North Carolina is a classic illustration of it.
Less than one-tenth of 1% of the population.
And we're being told the Civil Rights Act of 1964 addressed it.
It's even gotten so absurd that some of the supporters of this bathroom garbage are trying to tell us that it's in our founding documents that transgenders were being thought of and were being considered during the construction of the Bill of Rights.
It's absurd.
All of this is frankly absurd, but you have a majority not willing to stand up for itself.
So you have to expect what's happening to happen.
And I can give you countless examples of it: of parents not doing a damn thing about it when teachers are perverting and destroying history lessons in their schools because they're afraid of what bad grades will come, what recriminations will come if they complain.
So, you know, the left has been winning with this stuff for a long, long time because nobody wants to stand up to it.
And when people do stand up to it, they are made to pay.
And other people see what happens to people that stand up and say, I don't want that happening to me.
And so they slink along, try to be unnoticed.
And the steady erosion by virtue of perversion is happening to our culture.
And it's not just here, it's happening in Europe.
It's happening all over where there is Western civilization.
It's under assault.
Anyway, back to the phones we go.
This is, I guess, Stefan, is that pronounced, Stefan, in Winchester, Virginia.
It's great to have you with us.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thank you so much for taking my call.
Yeah, you bet.
So my question for you is: do you think that it's a viable option for Cruz to come back into the race?
No idea.
I'd like to know.
He says that he got out of a race after Indiana saying he didn't see a path to the nomination.
And his caveat here is: well, if I see a path to victory, I will get back in.
Yeah, so I guess my thinking is just by pulling out now, he kind of saves some money.
And then there's also the media hype about never Trump and all that other stuff.
So coming back in might give him a little bit of a boost.
So I don't know if maybe that could be something that could happen.
But you still have the delegate count that you have to deal with.
I mean, the path to victory is what?
How does victory, how is it defined here?
Great.
Well, I mean, looking at, so like in Virginia, he lost the state of Virginia, but then he ended up with 14 out of 15 delegates, and the same thing happened to Arizona.
I don't know.
Oh, he was sweeping delegates all over the country, but that was only going to matter on second and third and fourth ballots if they could stop Trump from winning it on the first ballot or even before the convention starts.
Now, with Cruz having pulled out, I don't know how Trump does not get the 1237 now with these state primaries.
So, you know, how you would define unless I see a path to victory, well, what would have to happen for there to be a path to victory?
Something would have to go really wrong with the Trump campaign.
I mean, really wrong.
There would have to be something happen so bad that Curly Haugland and the rest of the boys can organize a never-Trump convention that would be supported.
I don't know what that would be.
But maybe Senator Cruz sees another path here, and he just doesn't want to divulge what it is.
For me, I don't know what it would be.
I think a large part of it, let's say you're on the radio.
You had the backing of a whole lot of committed people, people that loved you, people that had a lot invested in you.
I mean, you were being hailed as the closest thing to Ronald Reagan that the conservative movement has ever had since Reagan.
And you're asked, if there's a path to victory, can you see yourself getting back in?
You don't want to let people down by saying, no, it's over.
I gave it my best shot, but I lost.
It's time to look for.
No, you say, hey, you know what?
If there's a way back in, absolutely.
And you say some hey, hallelujahs.
And you treat this as a positive possibility, keeping your supporters stoked for it.
And then you wait and see what happens.
With Trump.
Marco Rubio is back out there today, too, in addition to Senator Cruz.
Rubio, a big speech today at the Hudson Institute, I guess yes, a conservative think tank organization in Washington.
And a little bit of an indictment here of the media and their reluctance to actually tell anybody anything important.
It's a lot easier to say, for example, why do we give all this money to NATO and these other people that we're protecting do not?
And it's easier to say that than to explain what would happen if you didn't.
And so that doesn't mean we shouldn't do it.
I just think it takes time.
And quite frankly, to be fair, today's press that covers this process is not interested in covering any of that.
Now, what this is a reference to is Trump out there saying, we've got to get out of NATO.
We're thinking about getting out of NATO.
These people in NATO contributed at least squat to their own defense, so we can't afford anymore.
They don't treat us with any respect.
We defend them.
We send our kids off to die, to get injured, and so forth.
They don't contribute a hell of anything.
And then they get mad at us and they undermine us anyway.
So they hell with it.
We'll pull out.
And Rubio's point is, that's easy to say.
That's easy to say.
People rally to that.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, pull out.
Screw them.
A lot easier to say that than to actually explain why we do it.
This in Rubio's opinion, obviously, is valuable.
Why we do it.
And furthermore, what would happen if we actually did withdraw from NATO?
What would happen?
The press is not interested in going there.
The press is not interested in exposing or talking about that.
And because of that, what's unsaid here, in Rubio's opinion, because of that, what isn't reported is how stupid Trump's opinion is, in Rubio's perspective.
Rubio clearly thinks it'd be dumb to pull out a NATO.
And telling people why would expose Trump and his lack of knowledge about it or his being incorrect about it.
But the press, Rubio says, they're not interested in that.
They just like the fireworks that come from covering these outrageous things.
And then going and asking people, what do you think about what somebody here just said?
rather than delving in and explaining it.
The reason they don't explain it is because they don't know either.
I mean, the press, even though it was, and it always has been a bunch of leftists, it did have people that were educated in their area of expertise.
I mean, when you had a Supreme Court reporter like Lyle Denniston, the Baltimore son, I mean, a guy was forever going to be opposed to every conservative nominee, but the court, he knew it history.
He knew its history.
It was his area of expertise.
This is the point that Ben Rhodes was making about the White House Press Corps, how easy it was to lie to them about the Iran nuke deal.
All we had to tell them is what they wanted to hear.
You got a bunch of 27-year-old idealists, not a Republican in a bunch, 72 reporters in the White House press corps, not a single Republican in a bunch.
They're 27, their sum total of experience is covering political campaigns.
So all we had to do was figure out what they wanted to hear and tell them that's what we were doing, and that's what we got story-wise.
And what they wanted to hear was that we're dealing with moderates in Iran.
That the only reason that we're doing this Iranian nuke deal is because we've found a group of moderate Iranian leaders defined as these are not the Ayatollahs.
These are not the Mullahs.
These are not the death to America crowds.
And we're dealing with them and they're responsible and that's why we can do the deal.
He totally made it up.
There aren't any moderates in Iran with whom you can make a deal.
The moderates in Iran are probably in jail or soon to be.
Iran is still run by these wacko extremists and that's who we are making the Iran nuke deal with.
But he was able to lie about it because the press corps doesn't know any better.
They're not old enough to have accrued any experience anyway or significant knowledge.
And that's what Rubio is saying here.
So Trump comes along and suggests we get out of NATO because it's another example of America being screwed.
It's another example of American sovereignty being abused.
It's another example of America paying for the world and not getting any respect back.
So screw them.
And we're losing American jobs anyway.
And these European nations, they ought to be forced to defend themselves.
Why should we have to do it?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, you go, Trump, you go, Trump.
And meanwhile, Rubio says a responsible press would actually tell us what would happen, or at least go to somebody who disagrees with Trump and have them tell you, well, okay, here's what happens if we pull out of NATO.
He says that doesn't happen because the media Doesn't care about it.
Well, I don't think Rubio sees a path to victory in the won one state.
I don't see him.
Oh man, the long knives are out.
I'm just telling you, I'm just telling you what Rubio said.
You want to know what would happen when we pull out a NATO?
Is that your question?
What would happen when we pulled out a NATO?
The third Reich has shown back up.
You think the Third Reich is dormant in the Reichstag in Berlin?
The Third Reich has been reborn.
It's called militant Islam.
And if you haven't noticed, it is overtaking Europe.
We don't call it the Third Reich, but look at militant Islam was aligned with Hitler back in the days of World War II.
They had the same enemy, the Jews.
They were aligned.
We don't call it the Third Reich, but what do you call the kind of torture these people do?
Maybe ISIS doesn't have gas chambers, but they mass behead, they mass hang, they kidnap, they do all kinds.
I mean, they have perfected torture, and nobody says anything about it.
Well, it's not true to say nobody says anything about it, but there aren't any serious efforts to deal with it.
If we pull out a NATO with circumstances as they are, I think Rubio's point is, and anybody else who agrees with him, if we pull out a NATO, then any remaining ability to protect Europe is gone.
And we pull out and we announce we're pulling out, and we're no longer going to provide a military defense shield.
Well, then it's all speed ahead.
The season is wide open for the full conquest of Europe.
Now, the question would then be, well, what are we doing to stop it now?
You know, what is NATO doing now?
Make the case that NATO is one-sided.
It's us.
That we provide the military, that we provide the ammo, we provide the armaments, that we provide the actual defense.
And in many cases, there's one thing that's really true here, and that is that all of these Western European nations, which Democrats in this country consider to be utopia, you know, these European socialist countries are considered to be nirvana.
That's what we all want to be like.
And they've got, I mean, France, 14% unemployment, that's the norm.
And massive welfare states, why are they able to do that?
Because they don't have to pay for their own defense.
They don't have to fund.
They don't have to have a defense budget per se.
They've got makeshift militaries.
They do participate, like Denmark in the 9-11 coalition.
They had a small force that went over there and teletype mail.
I don't know what they did, but they had a small force.
These nations do have tiny little militaries, but not enough to even defend themselves if they're under assault.
That's us.
And there are people who think it's worth maintaining Europe as it is rather than have it be totally overrun.
I'm guessing that this is what Rubio means.
He might mean something entirely differently, so I shouldn't put words in his mouth.
It's my wild guess interpretation.
I have another obscene profit break I must take, and we'll be right back.
Hey, before we get back to the phones, there's a couple of soundbites here.
One of them is an ad.
A Hillary super PAC has released an ad attacking Trump on women using Trump's own words.
Now, obviously, we only have the audio here.
It's a minute long.
I want to run this by you, and I want you to be asking yourself as you hear this: will this be effective?
Will this hurt Trump?
Will it harm Trump?
Will it be bad news for Trump's presidential campaign?
Or is Trump immune to this?
Now, I'll give you a little hint.
The drive-bys are convinced that things like this spell the end for Trump.
Ads like this, and there are many more to come, are devastating for Trump.
That it's over before it even begins because Trump and the never-Trump people have provided this kind of ammo for Hillary and Hillary super PACs.
Here we go.
Nobody respects women more than Donald Trump.
She came to my wedding.
She ate like a pig.
And seriously, the wedding cake was like missing in action.
Does she have a good body now?
Of course.
Does she have a fat ass?
Absolutely.
Well, I just don't respect her as a journalist.
I have no respect for her.
I don't think she's very good.
I think she's highly overrated.
But when I came out, you know, you could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever.
Well, obviously, it's great outer beauty.
I mean, we could say politically correct that the look doesn't matter, but the look obviously matters.
Like you wouldn't have your job if you weren't beautiful.
Donald Trump, knocking supermodel Heidi Klum in the New York Times, saying, Heidi Klum, sadly, she's no longer a 10.
A person who's flat-chested is very hard to be a 10.
Okay.
Right.
You know what?
The women get it better than we do, folks.
Bye.
They get it better than we do.
I see.
So you treat women with respect.
I can't say that either.
So there's the ad.
I'm trying to gauge the facial expressions of admitted Trump supporters on the other side of the glass.
They're all laughing uproariously.
Is this going to be harmful to Trump?
He doesn't worry.
Nothing new in here.
Nobody's learning anything they haven't heard before.
Everybody's heard all this.
Everybody's heard this.
That's what the reaction is.
Nothing new here.
Everybody's heard Trump say this.
Everybody knows Trump's joking about it.
I mean, let me, well, it hasn't worked up to now.
Unless maybe it has, unless you want to look at Trump's numbers with women and say, yeah, he's not doing all that well with women.
And this could be why.
These statements that he's made, that women have heard, even though he's the presumptive nominee.
And remember, we've got polls in three states today: Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania.
Trump is leading in one of them, Quinnipiac, and tied with Hillary in the other two, despite all this stuff being out there.
You know, I'm saying something interesting here.
If Ted Cruz had said all this, why?
Why would it be?
You're right.
Ted Cruz would be finished if Ted Cruz had said it.
But why?
Why would Cruz be finished?
And Trump's not.
I mean, Trump's not finished.
Whatever the impact here, this does not end the Trump campaign today.
It would end Rubio.
It would end Jeb Bush.
It would spell the end for Ted Cruz.
If Chris Christie had come out and said this stuff, if Ben Carson had come out and said this stuff, if Bill Clinton said this stuff, it would not harm him.
What do we learn from this, thus?
What?
I didn't understand what you said, but why would throwing Bill Clinton in the mix upset your answer?
Okay, if Trump survives it because he's a reality star, Trump survives this because he's a real guy.
This is how real guys talk.
How about this?
American politics is determined by trolls on the internet today.
Maybe not determined, but internet trolls have a lot of say about what people are thought of.
Well, Trump is an internet troll.
With all of his tweeting, Trump is one of those guys.
Trump has brought the Internet troll to the campaign.
Now, there's a negative connotation to internet trolls, but at the same time, this is becoming mainstream.
This kind of speech pattern, the way people speak, this is common on the internet.
This is the kind of stuff that people say every day, everywhere, on the internet, multiple times a day, and nothing happens to them.
They don't get shut down.
They don't get shouted down.
Now, they are speaking anonymously.
In most cases, most of the trolls are gutless, spineless poles, and they're out there doing it all anonymously.
But I think there's even beyond all that, there's another reason why you put these words in the mouth of any other Republican running for this nomination, and this spot does wipe them out.
It doesn't wipe out Trump.
There's a reason why.
Moving on to the next bite, though, CNN last night, Don Lemon spoke with Dana Bash, chief political correspondent about this ad.
Said, that's a pretty devastating look at Trump's own words.
How do you think this is going to play, Dana?
First of all, this is a roadmap that was given to the Clinton team.
And I should say we should underscore that this is the pro-Clinton super PAC, not the Clinton team.
A roadmap given to them by the Republicans in the Never Trump movement.
They understood that this was a potential weak spot for Donald Trump, big time, maybe not as much in the Republican electorate, although he didn't do as well with women as he did with men, but very much so they're hoping, certainly now Democrats, in the general election.
Wait a minute now.
Wait, what?
What was that sounded like a woman wandering in vain for a coherent thought?
Dana Bash, if I heard that right, did not universally proclaim, that's it.
That's it.
He's finished.
There's so much more of this stuff.
No one could survive this.
She's analyzing this in all kinds of different intricate ways.
This is the roadmap that's been given to the Clinton team, the never Trump, the Never Trump movement.
They understood this is a weak spot for Trump big time.
Maybe not as much in the Republican electorate, but when you get to the gentleman, she did not conclude that this is it, did she?
She did not say, well, I mean, that's it for Trump.
This finishes him.
And this is just the beginning.
The Hillary Pacts and all these, there's so much more of this stuff.
You just wait.
This is just the first bomb to drop.
No way Trump can.
She didn't say that.
Hmm.
Wonder why.
Okay, we got to take a break here to top the hour.
But when we get back, I mentioned yesterday I had a piece by the great British historian Paul Johnson, essentially supporting Trump.
And for one reason, this man, the noted, renowned historian of all time, Paul Johnson, thinks that the single greatest harm that has been perpetrated on Western civilization is political correctness.
And the fact that Trump has blown it out of the water is why he supports Trump.
▲
Export Selection