All Episodes
Previous Next
April 27, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:51
April 27, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
No, no, I've told Mr. Trump not to schedule these things to start at 12 noon.
I've told him, I mean, he doesn't listen.
He's his own guy.
He's going to do what he's going to do.
But I've I've I'm no, no.
He'll probably make the adjustment as time goes on.
But this foreign policy speech, somebody else set this thing up.
I know what's going on with this thing today.
It's at the Mayflower Hotel is in Washington, D.C. But normally what happens is the only people that schedule personal appearances right when this program starts are Obama and the Democrats.
And they do it trying to get this program preempted so that local stations will carry what they're doing and tick off my audience.
Anyway, folks, great to have you here.
And we are at the Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, and I have question for you about that today as the program unfolds.
But I have to tell you, I've got no other way to say it.
I was just not right yesterday.
I I well, it's not a big deal.
I mean, it's not a big deal, but I I I clearly said on this program 24 hours ago that what was going to happen yesterday and last night was not going to shake anything up because it was already expected to happen.
Trump was going to win.
And the delegates that Trump was going to collect had already been factored in.
And that these five states that that uh that voted yesterday were really not going to have that big an impact on things because nothing unexpected would happen, and that's not true.
This was a tsunami that happened yesterday.
It was incredible what happened here yesterday.
Do you realize, folks, that Trump won every county in every state that was holding elections yesterday?
Every county in every state, nobody predicted.
Even the most favorable predictions, even the most supportive predictions.
Nobody came close really to uh to what happened yesterday.
Trump got 58% of the vote in Connecticut.
Cruz got 12%.
Trump got 61% in Delaware, Cruz got 16%.
57% for Trump in Pennsylvania.
He that that's surprised a lot of people.
Um and I'll tell you something else.
Kasich was thought to do better.
And he wasn't going to win anything.
But people thought that Kasich would do better in some of these Northeastern states because it's a bunch of moderate liberal uh Republicans there.
Trump 57%, Pennsylvania Cruz, 22% there.
64% for Trump in Rhode Island Cruz at 10%.
Uh 54% Maryland for Trump, 19% for Cruz.
Nobody predicted that Trump would win every county in all five states.
Now the delegate situation, Trump got at least 105 delegates.
Kasich got five, and Ted Cruz got one.
And Trump will probably say that somebody stole those six delegates from him and that they're actually his.
He'll do it in a jocular fashion.
Ted Cruz has a major announcement today at uh at 4 o'clock.
Uh timed to occur after this program ends.
And there are two.
No, no, no, no, he's not gonna be night.
Come on.
You know, you don't don't sit in there and gloat.
Be be nice.
Don't you have any compassion for people that try this?
All right.
I look, there's two things that can happen.
It's either gonna be he's gonna announce that Mike Pence is gonna endorse him, the governor of Indiana, or he's gonna announce his vice presidential pick.
And frankly, folks, I don't see Mike Pence, the governor of Indiana endorsing Cruz or anybody today.
But this this defeat yesterday was just too massive.
There's there's no reason to endorse somebody today.
There's there's no basis for it.
Um unless your endorsement is Trump, and and then Pence is not gonna do that.
So it has to be that the Cruz is gonna announce that he's chosen somebody to be his vice president, probably gonna be Carly Fiorina, who uh might be looked at as somebody that can help in California because she's lived there.
She has uh run for office there before.
And uh uh it's it's you know, a typical move for a for a campaign that's in this position.
But I I this as I say, that there are four takeaways.
Uh watched Trump last night after the voting was all over and the tabulations were in, and he just announced that he's the presumptive nominee now.
He went out and he said that Bernie Sanders was robbed and should run as an independent.
He said that he will take his people out of the GOP, and the GOP will lose the White House and the Senate if people don't unite behind him, that he had no problem doing that.
And he then went after Hillary Clinton.
Said if she were a man, she wouldn't get 5% of the vote.
That's the max she would get.
That all she does is play the gender card.
And he basically said Hillary Clinton's going to be easier to beat than the 16 guys I already have beaten.
It was it was Trump pulled something off last night.
He came off as presidential and also came off as Trump.
Actually put those two things together out there.
There is panic setting in at the Republican establishment level, and there is curiosity that is boiling over in the in in some sectors of the conservative movement.
John Pedoritz has a piece today, wondering what why can't Cruz do anything?
I mean, here's the great, great conservative.
Why aren't people voting for why aren't conservative Republicans coming out and voting for Cruz?
There are a lot of people scratching their heads trying to figure this out.
I think I can answer it, but you know what?
I want to leave that question open for you all today for a while.
I want to find out what you think, because it is kind of curious, is it not?
I want to find out what you think, because it is a little bit different.
Uh there is you have here well, no, no, it's people who think that ideology matters, and people who think that conservatism is the antidote to what's happening to the country.
We've got a conservative.
We do not have a Mitt Romney.
We've got an actual tried and true conservative running for the Republican presidential nomination.
This is something that years ago people would have been celebrating and would have considered a major victory just to have this happen.
Now it has happened.
You don't, I can't tell you the number of hardcore conservatives, and maybe just not hardcore, but people just they are conservative, but they're not ideologues about it.
I mean, it doesn't come into life, but they're still from all walks of conservatism.
People are curious and trying to figure out why this is happening.
And you can't leave Trump out of the equation here when you when you answer the question.
But I think it's not hard to answer at all.
Yeah, and I don't want to answer it because not yet, because when I say something, there's nothing left to be said about uh whatever it is.
But like Jim Garrity at the uh National Review, his blog is called Morning Jolt, beating Trump at the convention became more difficult last night.
And here's an excerpt.
John Pedorit says it's time to face facts that even if you grant that Ted Cruz was never going to be a strong candidate in the Northeast, that he's faltering.
After Trump's astounding five for five primary night by margins that were likely surprising even for Trumpists, it's now Indiana or bust.
And if Trump wins the primary next week in Indiana, Cruz is toast, and Trump will certainly be the Republican nominee.
And this is Pedoritz.
Now, there's no putting lipstick on this pig Cruz's numbers, like his numbers in New York last week were beyond horrible, with six weeks to go before voting concludes.
The man conservatives are hoping can overcome Trump with his clever delegate game and more serious attitude is getting 10 to 15% of the vote in major states.
Garretty himself writes, I say this is a guy who's pulling for Cruz now.
Why is he having such a tough time winning some of these states?
Why is he fighting for his life in Indiana of all places?
The land of Hoosiers, the land of Dan Quayle, Mitch Daniels.
Why?
They go on to talk about how puzzled they are that Cruz lost the evangelical vote at a lot of places.
He lost some of the Southern primaries to a previously pro-choice, three times married casino and strip club owner, who bragged of his affairs with married women.
There's just a lot of people that don't understand this.
It's it's so much was thought to be understood, not that the skids were greased, but it's it's it has a lot of people scratching their heads, frustrated, bamboozled, curious as to just what explains this.
Now we go over to uh Mike Allen and his daily newsletter published at the Politico.
Donald Trump said last night after winning each of the five primary states by 29 or more points, and again, won every county in every state, every county in five states.
Trump says, as far as I'm concerned, it's over.
I consider myself the presumptive nominee, absolutely.
To the pundits who will try to infuse next week's Indiana primary, Ted Cruz's last stand with melodrama and cosmic significance.
Good luck.
Trump won Connecticut by 29, Delaware by 40, Maryland by 31, Pennsylvania by 35, Rhode Island by 39.
Mike Allen says, I think the voters are trying to tell us something.
A top Republican insider laments that even with conservative calculations, he now projects that Trump will cross the magic number of 1,237 delegates to win on the first ballot.
Says the dominoes are falling now.
This are Republican insider not named.
Dominoes are falling, you can't stop them.
Kasich staying in the race was an in-kind contribution to Trump.
It blocked Cruz from ever getting his one-on-one shot.
Kasich hasn't pulled enough to matter anyway.
I think that's a non-factor.
Mike Murphy, Republican consultant extraordinaire.
I mean, when you look up Republican consultant in the dictionary, it's Murphy's picture that you see there.
Murphy is the dean.
Murphy is the head honcho.
Murphy, when he's just it, okay.
He headed Jeb Bush's super PAC.
He was on PMS NBC last night with Brian Williams.
He said the lights are going out across the Republican Party tonight.
It's like Trump has built a laboratory to blow a general election even against Hillary Clinton.
So the wisest men at the top of the Republican Party think that Trump is guaranteed to elect Hillary Clinton in a landslide.
And that it's the end of the Republican Party.
That's what Murphy's saying here.
The lights are going out across the Republican Party tonight.
It's like Trump has built a lab to blow a general election, even against Hillary Clinton.
Meaning Hillary should be easily beatable.
Hillary Clinton's the easiest to beat Democrat down the pike, and we're gonna blow it, we're gonna lose in a landslide because we're gonna nominate Trump.
That's what they think at the upper echelons of the Republican establishment.
Murphy predicted Trump that will turn on the insult comedy against Clinton, but her big judo win is to play the victim.
Jeb was the anti-Trump.
Now we have Trump and Kasich, the guy who could win a general, can't get arrested.
So Mike Murphy thinks that the best bet we have is Kasich.
The only guy that can win the general and beat Hillary, instead, we're gonna get Trump who can't beat Hillary, in fact, is going to get beaten in a landslide, going to destroy the Republican Party.
What has been destroyed here, folks?
What well, not yet, but what has really taken on some heavy water is the GOP establishment And the consultant class, I mean, they had all of their candidates.
They had two or three of them in that original mix of 16.
And combined, they couldn't get 10% of the vote.
With all of that money.
And there are reasons for all of this.
And I'm looking forward to getting into them with you and uh and trying to make sense of some of this.
Because it does make sense.
What's happening here is logical.
Some people may not want to hear it.
They may reflexively instinctively disagree with it, but what's happening here, if you understand one thing, let me give you one thing going into the break.
Presidential elections.
You stop and think about this now.
This is I would I would classify this as a near profundity.
Presidential elections are situational.
They are not ideological.
Stop and think about what that means.
Of course, I am here to help explain it as the program unfolds.
We'll take our first obscene profit time out of the day and be right back.
Did you hear what the Hillary people did to Crazy Bernie?
They bombarded his Facebook pages with porn.
They got a bunch of Bernie Sanders' Facebook pages torn down by bombarding them with Kitty porn.
The Clinton camp, well, a member of a group supporting Hillary staged a cyber attack using pornography to infect Facebook pages promoting Crazy Bernie, leading the social media network to take him down temporarily.
You know what the Democrats, you never know whether they're pushing porn as a civil right, some sort of new cultural thing we must all accept.
You never know what they're doing with this.
But Facebook never nevertheless didn't take a chance and uh pulled it down.
Now Trump is down to needing 287 delegates to clinch the GOP nomination.
There are 10 races left, and Indiana, the big one, of course, coming up next Tuesday.
And it's really all down to that.
But the momentum uh after yesterday is undeniable.
I want to go to the audio sound bites.
I need to straighten something out.
The uh I guess it was last week sometime.
It might have been earlier this week, it's already Wednesday.
I made a reference to what would happen at the convention if Trump gets close and whatever is whatever games are played to deny him the nomination, even if it's this delegate mechanism that Cruz is using.
I I made an observation that's true, and that is that if the nomination is denied Trump, Trump supporters are gonna go nuts.
Now, it has been suggested that I was advocating or acknowledging that there's going to be a riot.
That's not what I meant.
Nor am I trying to further some sort of Trump talking point.
I'm simply talking about human nature.
The Trump campaign is made up of people that are, I mean, there's we've discussed over the course of this campaign.
The bond that Trump supporters have with him is unbreakable.
It's deep.
There isn't any other candidate in this race who has anything like it, folks.
Not Hillary, not nobody, nobody's had it.
Only Trump has this special bond.
The media can't break it, they didn't make it happen.
It's it's a it's a unique thing.
It's a special thing, it doesn't happen to everybody.
Even successful people in media sometimes do not have this kind of a bond with their audience.
I'll give you an example, what I'm talking about.
Um back in the 90s, uh, before cable TV fractured news, the nightly newscasts on ABC CBSNBC had phenomenal numbers.
Huge numbers, in terms of ratings.
And you had the anchors of Peter Jennings and Tom Rawka and and Dan Radder.
And of course, millions of people watching, but but the audiences did not have connections with those anchors.
They just knew them.
I mean, they were celebrities.
I came back from the Houston convention in 1992.
I was on a plane with Peter Jennings and Ed Bradley.
And we're at baggage claim.
And I had all kinds of people coming up and saying hello to me and saying complimentary things, nice things, what have you.
Nobody approached Ed Bradley, and nobody approached Jenny.
Everybody knew they were.
And people stared at them and they pointed at them.
But they didn't have connection.
If Trump shows up at baggage claim, which he'd be swarmed.
And it's that kind of connection that Trump has, and nobody else in this political season has had it.
And my only point is, with that connection being as deep as it is, and the Trump people already think that behind the scenes tricks are being played to steal the nomination from him.
And they don't understand his delegate business at all.
And they don't understand how Cruz is not winning a thing and is still getting all these delegates.
It doesn't make sense to him.
So if a contested convention occurred, and if Cruz did happen to win the nomination on a second, there would be hell to pay.
And I'm not talking about riots.
I'm just talking about people, Trump supporters, would be fit to be tied.
They would leave the convention, they would walk out, they would leave the party, they wouldn't vote.
It would be a mess.
Speaking of which, Steve Hayes of the Weekly Standard, we got the soundbite coming up, says that the Republican establishment, even now is planning on a third party candidate.
If Trump is the nominee, they are just that panicked about it, and they just can't abide it.
There's no way they can get behind it.
Trump campaign.
Gotta take a break, be back here in just a second.
Okay, people already taking a stab at answering my questionnaire, and I really haven't framed it specifically, but it's okay.
Take your stab at it.
I'm just going to tell you the reason that Cruz is a conservative is not triumphing in this.
It's nothing to do with the fact that conservatism is a minority.
It's nothing to do with the fact that people are not conservative.
That's what makes it intriguing.
Conservatism's not losing membership.
Conservatism is not weakening.
Conservatism is not disbanding.
That's not a factor here.
That's what makes the answer to the question, the question itself so fascinating.
Because for the longest time, so many, and not just in the conservative intelligentsia, not just the conservative intellectuals and media, but average ordinary run-of-the-mill.
Conservative men and women all across the country thought that all it would take is a legitimate conservative who could explain it.
It was cheerful, it was articulate, uh, because we have the greatest opportunity to contrast ourselves with liberalism and the destruction that they bring.
And it hasn't, it hasn't fallen out that way.
There are reasons for it, but it's not because conservatism is per se in trouble.
And it's it's it there are other factors here.
Now, I want to get back to this business here at the convention, what what would happen here if they go contested and Trump is denied.
You can't, you can't take things out of context.
You have to put them in context when when analyzing this.
So on one hand, you have you have Cruz who is brilliantly putting together this delegate plan of his.
Now, I don't care how many of you in the Trump camp think it's cheating.
It isn't.
I don't care how many of you think it's a violation of Democrat process, it isn't.
Everything Trump is doing, everything Cruz is doing, candidates have done for time immemorial.
They have to do it even in non-contested conventions.
They have to get the delegates, and those delegates are acquired in a number of ways.
One is via primary vote, the other is at state conventions.
So Cruz is brilliantly working these state conventions, and he is securing Much delegate support on the second and third ballot.
But there's a problem here, and that is Cruz isn't winning elections anywhere.
And this and that has nothing to do with whether he's getting delegates or not.
That has to do with, in a contested convention, if Cruz were to somehow pull off the nomination by securing 1,237 votes from delegates on a second or third ballot, the backlash would be overwhelming because there hasn't been an accompanying series of election wins in these primaries that would make the delegate sweep
make sense.
Whether people understood it or not, it it would not be seen as valid uh or proper.
But it's the only route that Cruz has open to him.
And him and his supporters would face a tromenal backlash if he wins the nomination by winning delegates but not getting votes.
And so if that were to happen, the only point that I'm making is that Trump supporters, whether they're right or wrong in their assessment of what happened and how it happened, would simply be fit to be tied.
I'm not talking about riots.
I'm not talking about burning anything down.
I'm saying they would be fit to be tied.
They would they would look at this as having been stolen from them.
They'd walk out, the Republican Party would have, I mean, they can't win.
The Republican Party cannot win without Trump's voters.
It just can't happen.
Well, my making this observation has been seen in some quarters as my suggesting that there would be riots, and that this is something that Trump has forecast, and that somehow I am carrying a Trump message.
I'm not doing anything of the sort.
I'm not even thinking riots when I think that people would be upset, angry, and would protest a result like this.
If Cruz had been winning primaries and succeeds with a delegate challenge, that's a little bit different picture.
So Well, anyway, I'm leading up to the fact that they discussed this on the five.
My contention here that uh that that there would be uh hell to pay from the from the Trump supporters.
It was uh on yesterday's program, and they started out playing this clip of what I said.
I don't think anybody understands the blowback that would happen from the Trumpists.
If that ever happens, we are going to see a nuclear explosion like you've never seen before.
Holy smokes!
The blowback that will happen then, the backlash.
That will be the end of the Republican Party.
And I did say that it would make what happened at Watson or Rodney King look like like romper room, but I wasn't talking about riots, and I wasn't certainly not advocating them.
I'm just it was reacting to Trump callers that I've been taking for the past two weeks who are fit to be tied over this whole delegate thing, don't understand it, think it's rigged, think it's cheating, think it's not the Democrat process, and if it actually happened that their guy was denied on this basis, oh look out.
That's all I said.
I just wanted to clarify this.
I kind of ticked off that I have to, but nevertheless, I'll be glad I've got the opportunity to do it.
Here's some of the reactions starting with Kimberly Gilfoyle at Fox News on the five.
I got on box.
I don't think it's implausible to say that there would be chaos or there would be backlash or there would be some kind of uproar or disappointment.
People certainly have been passionate that our big supporters of Donald Trump to come out to hear him speak, waiting in long lines, getting sifting through protesters to be able to get into whatever event space that he has at the time.
Right.
And here's Greg Gutfeld with his reaction.
If you believe that he is going to lose and that Hillary will be the nominee in the president and will put in four Supreme Court justices, your conclusion is do you let it happen or you do everything possible to stop it and incur the wrath at the convention from is the Wrath that you get from the Trumpets, as Rush says, worth it to save a massacre in November.
So well, he's basically asking if it's worth enduring the wrath of the Trumpists to nominate somebody who, in the eyes of the anti-Trump crowd, um can't defeat Hillary.
And uh I that's that we'll let events answer that question.
I I don't think it's going a little bit far here.
I just wanted to clarify uh my characterization of the reaction of Trump supporters should this delegate strategy of cruises actually manifest and pay off when he get the nomination.
Especially now, you take it put the context of what happened yesterday, those five states, again, every county Trump wins, winning 59% of the vote, 62% of the vote, 54% of the vote.
Uh it would be a tough sell.
Even though it would be all legal, nobody would have time for that, though, because it would appear to be a violation of the expressed will of the majority as having occurred in actual elections.
And they'd in terms of that, they'd have a point.
Back after this, don't go away.
And welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I just checked a little bit of the Trump foreign policy speech.
Let me tell you what this is, by the way.
A lot of people who's this speech to?
What what foreign policy group?
I mean, it's in a hotel.
Well, what's the group?
Brilliant questions if you're asking those questions.
This speech has been put together by Trump supporters, and a special guest list of foreign policy people in Washington were invited to come hear it.
It there is no de facto organization that Trump's addressing they might have given themselves a name, but it's in a hotel ballroom.
It's at the Mayflower Hotel, I believe.
And this has been designed by Trump and his campaign to um it's a teleprompter speech that he wrote.
Um actually other people wrote it.
He didn't like it and rewrote a lot a lot of it.
Uh and uh it's the part that I heard he he uh uh said something very different about Israel than he has said in debates.
In debates, he has said that he would not start out in any negotiation in a biased or balanced direction toward Israel because the Palestinians or others in the negotiations would not consider him fair.
He made no bones in the little section that I had a chance to hear.
He just made no bones about his support for Israel and its role as our lone ally and the lone democracy in the Middle East.
We are rolling on this speech.
Cookie's rolling up there in our massive uh audio soundbite control room, and we'll have excerpts of this as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears today.
But this is an event today that's essentially uh it's it's designed.
This is not a criticism, folks.
This is not criticism, okay.
It is designed to look like a regularly given foreign policy address that happens every year before some august group of striped pants crowded people.
In fact, this is an invitation event sponsored by Trump and his supporters to add weight uh foreign policy weight to his campaign.
Now, I don't know who's there, I don't know who's inviting people in Afghanistan.
I saw some uh ambassadors, former ambassadors and so forth.
I mean, they're heavyweight people in the Fortin policy community.
But it's it's for example, it's not this is not at the trilateral commission.
It's not over to Council on Foreign Relations.
It's not at a think tank where these things normally occur.
It's in a hotel ballroom, and Trump is standing in front of four um American flags.
Let me get started on the phones before we get backed up too much there.
Joe in Los Angeles.
It's great to have you up first today, sir.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, it's a pleasure to talk with you.
Over the years.
Um a big fan of Nile Rogers, by the way, who I saw uh performing with uh Duran Duran.
I hope you I wish you'd had the opportunity to see them when they were touring was basically she canile Rogers and Duran Durant.
Um but but that all that aside, uh, the question is this is how can somebody like Trump.
I mean, I've I've documented who who calls Ted Lion Ted, even though I've documented, I mean, I've got five examples of lies that Trump has told here.
I don't even want to go into them.
Oh, Cruz can give you 13.
Cruz can give you 13 examples where where Trump policy is identical to Hillary.
You've got those soundbites coming up.
Right.
But also basically Trump, and I mean, in the beginning, Trump's policies have all been cheap imitation of Cruz's policies on conservatism, and now him running in the eastern states, he switched over to cheap imitation of liberal policies with allowing men in the ladies' rooms and and um and uh uh changing his having the Republicans kick his position out on abortion.
So it's is it's just in in insane, really.
I mean, he he's not even the strongest Cruz on amnesty.
His touchback embassy is a lot weaker than Cruz.
He's probably gonna split on that.
He already told the New York Times reporter something to that effect.
Okay, look, let's really wait.
Let's just stipulate this.
Let's just still why then is Trump leading this race and Cruz not.
Well, very simple.
It's the image.
Trump has a pre-established image.
He's he's had a TV show where he's always the boss.
Judging people in challenges, judging people in challenges that he could himself could never pass.
In marketing challenges, he is irrelevant.
It's irrelevant.
You you mean the way he judges people on his TV show, The Apprentice and fires them, he couldn't measure up on his own show.
Is that your point?
No, no, no, that's not the point.
The point is that is that he has had this, he has an image of being a fighter.
It's that analogy that you had that cracked me up where you call uh uh an exterminator, he doesn't get the job done, he doesn't get the rats out of your attic, and now all of a sudden you there's a somebody who comes along who is kind of gruff and says he's gonna get those damn rats out of your attic, and you believe him.
Well, it's it's partially that.
He is seen as a fighter, but it's also that he does have he has pre-established an image as a fighter.
And even though he's completely wrong on his policies, he's shipped to the rest.
I mean, it it's a lot of people.
But wait, hold on a minute.
See, you're we you're you're I'm gonna have to, I guess, specify my question uh even more.
His supporters don't think he's wrong.
His supporters agree with it.
And there are a lot of them.
His supporters like him for a whole host of reasons.
I you know what I might do.
I might try in a paragraph to summarize my six-month long explanation of why people support Trump.
I could probably do it.
I could probably do it if I think about it.
I can probably put it together at the break at the top of the hour.
Uh but you know, you you say he's wrong on policy here and there, and he's he adopts this uh message for Northeastern states and then a different message here.
Well, if you understand that presidential elections are situational and not ideological.
Uh and if you stop and think about that, it might help you understand how come the Clintons won twice and why Obama wins.
Obama's not even thought of as a liberal by people who voted for him.
Not a lot of them.
I mean, to the hardcore leftist, yeah, he's that and more.
But to the low information crowd that elected him, they weren't electing a liberal.
They weren't electing somebody as opposed to they might have been electing somebody they they that they thought was not a conservative because of the branding that Republican and conservatism has.
But Obama was responding to certain circumstances at the moment, like the Iraq war, and he was able to position himself in a situational way and not even have to run as an as an ideologue.
And the people were voting for him.
It didn't matter whether he was right or wrong on some of the stuff, like you're talking about Trump being wrong on policy here.
You're getting way past uh that area where people make their attachments.
By the way, some of this is new to me.
These are new realizations that I have uh uh arrived at while studying this whole campaign.
As it began last summer.
Now I've got to take a break.
Joe, I appreciate the call.
Love hearing from people from the left coast.
We'll be back.
I had this in the stack yesterday, didn't have a chance to get to it.
Harvard University survey of students.
Shocking number of practical majority of millennials now have rejected capitalism and openly favorism.
A majority of millennials now reject capitalism.
Poll shows the Washington Post has a story.
Harvard released their own uh story yesterday with the results of the poll in an apparent rejection of the basic principles of the U.S. economy.
A new poll shows that most young people do not support capitalism.
The Harvard University survey, which polled young adults between 18 and 29, found that 51% of them do not support capitalism.
42% said they do.
It isn't clear that the young people in the poll would prefer some alternative system.
33% said that they support socialism.
And of course, now people say, why?
What has happened here?
It's not hard to figure the answer out to that either.
If you just take, for example, my explanation of what actually has become of the college education.
▲
Export Selection