All Episodes
Previous Next
April 6, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:33
April 6, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Greetings to you, my friends.
Welcome back.
Great to have you.
L Rushbow behind the golden EIB microphone, most beloved host all across the fruited plane most of the time.
You want to send an email, Lrushbo at EIBNet.com.
Telephone number 800 282882, the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
A couple of soundbites here at a repeat of the Dr. Crowdhammer soundbite.
I made an observation last night late in the night when I was first hearing any news.
Both Carl Rove and Dr. Krauthammer both thought that one of the most important points of the night was that Trump held his base.
Thought it was incredible.
And I thought that's a strange take, given that Ted Cruz just had a blowout win here to all of a sudden talk about the solidity of Trump's base.
Now I've been I've been telling people about Trump's base, his supporters since last fall.
I know who they are, I know why they're there, and I have also made it clear that there's not a soul on earth that can talk them out of supporting Trump.
There's not a soul on there's nobody in the world on any talk show, there's nobody on television, there's nobody in the White House, there's nobody anywhere, there's nobody in Hollywood that can convince a Trump voter to abandon him.
The only person that can make that happen is Trump.
You remember I've described this bond of support that Trump has with his people, that even winning candidates sometimes do not have it is an incredible thing.
And I've I've I've had a lot of people uh think in saying such things that I am implying an endorsement, which I wasn't, I'm merely explaining.
So last night we had Rove and Crowdhammer and even Megan Kelly all remarking on this uh as though it might have been the first time they noticed.
I think I'm I now know what this might be about.
Uh nobody is accusing them, by the way, of implicitly endorsing Trump by speaking glowingly of the solidity of his support.
I actually think what it's rooted in is this.
I think a lot of people don't like Trump and are thinking that after this two weeks that there's going to be a lot of Trump support, leave him.
And if you look at the things that they think might make that happen.
Okay, the Heidi Cruz uh retweet photo.
The people I'm talking about probably believe that even the most rabid of Trump's supporters would find that objectionable, and some of them might abandon it.
And then the whole Michelle Fields controversy, where Trump's campaign manager has now been charged with misdemeanor battery over grabbing a female info babe and pulling her out of line to the point that she says he bruised her arm.
And some of the other unflattering things that they think Trump has said about women.
And so the primary comes last night, and Trump's support was rock solid.
His usual 30, 35% was right there, 37%.
Cruz happened to best it by 13.
I think they were probably stunned.
I think a lot of these people expect at some point that Trump can be so bad, so reprehensible, so mean, so coarse, whatever, that his supporters are going to abandon him.
And I'm telling you, it's not, and I think they're awaking to that now.
I think they're realizing that isn't going to happen.
And I'll tell you why that matters.
That matters going to the convention.
These people are all going to be needed to beat Hillary Clinton.
Everybody voting in these Republican primaries is going to be needed.
Our first caller of the day claiming there's no way he can vote for Trump, he'll he'll not vote, which is a vote for Hillary.
That's not going to work.
And even people in the Republican side in the commentariat know that they're starting to figure out now that whatever happens with Trump, you'd better not have his supporters end up thinking he's been screwed.
Because if that happens, you are talking about a much larger number of people than anybody wants to contemplate just staying home or actively working for the opposition.
Don't think that wouldn't happen either.
If Trump supporters think that he's being sabotaged, one way or the other, don't be surprised if some of them actively work for Hillary Clinton just to stick it.
So the establishment has to be very careful how they're going to do this.
And I think a lot of these people now who expected Trump to start fading.
They've expected that from June 16th.
They expect with every controversial statement Trump's going to start losing support, and he's not.
And even after these past two weeks, he didn't lose.
Now he didn't add to it, but he didn't lose anybody, and I think they're blown away by it.
Here is uh, let's see, David Axelrod.
I give you a couple of uh Democrat analysts described as journalists or disguised as journalists talking about.
This is CNN Anderson Cooper last night.
And we have David Axarod, who ran uh who ran Obama's campaign, uh Ronald Brownstein of the National Journal, and Gloria Borger with this exchange about the establishment and what they might do in order to prevent the party blowing up at the convention.
Can you bypass the number one finisher, the number two finisher?
And pick someone who didn't run at all and not have a complete revolt within your party.
The party establishment may try and do that because they may reason that that is less dangerous than having Donald Trump as the nominee.
There's a very angry Republican electorate.
And what would certify their anger more than the party establishment saying, you know what, thanks for participating.
Really glad that you've cast your votes.
Now we'll do what we're going to do.
The party may decide to do it if they say to Trump, okay, we're not going to go with you.
Okay, so these three think that the establishment would be committing suicide, but that they might do it anyway.
They so detest Trump that they might commit suicide anyway by picking somebody that didn't run.
You know, the name Paul Ryan keeps popping up and others.
And so they're discussing uh, you know, whether or not their party would would uh would do this.
And they obviously conclude that they might do it just to prevent Trump from getting control.
Which I don't look, folks, I've never doubted uh that possibility, primarily because of what the establishment is.
You just don't people like this just don't sit idly by and let a bunch of peasants with pitchforks come in and take over.
They're just not gonna do it.
But some people think that clearer heads will prevail and they will realize that if they try anything like that, that they're actually blowing off millions of potential voters.
But I'm here to tell you there are some establishment members who are perfectly fine.
If if they could reconstitute a Republican Party that had no pro-lifers in it, they would do it.
If they could reconstitute a Republican Party that had no social values interested, they would do it in a minute.
If it meant they didn't win the White House for another generation, they would do it.
As long as the establishment uh kept itself together.
Here's F. Chuck Todd and a former Republican Nicole Wallace, she worked in the Bush White House.
Um basically what this bite is on the Today Show today, uh, inside joke among Washington established the Republicans is it's better to lose with Cruz.
Savanna Guthrie says, was this a big night for Ted Cruz or for the stop Trump forces?
Because I see Northeastern states coming up that wouldn't typically be Cruz country.
Lindsey Graham is probably the best perspective.
He puts out a tweet that says, Congratulations, Ted Cruz, we've done it.
We are going to be able to deny Donald Trump a majority of the convention.
It wasn't.
Congratulations, Ted Cruz.
You're on your way to becoming the next president of the United States.
He came and sat with us and said that it is more important to maintain the principles and the dignity and the honor of the conservative movement with someone like Ted Cruz, who he acknowledged may lose in November, than to roll the dice with someone like Donald Trump.
I shared this rumor and this talker in Washington that loses with Cruz is becoming a bit of a punchline.
Well, she's establishment.
I mean, you may not like hearing that, but she is.
She is part of the establishment uh establishment.
So if she says that there are jokes running around inside the establishment with a punchline better to lose with Cruz, then you've got to believe that some people are indeed actually saying so.
It's an interesting observation from F. Chuck Todd about Lindsay Graham to see.
Hey, Senator Cruz, we're on the way here to an open convention.
We're on the way to denying Trump.
Not congratulations, Senator.
We're on the way to you winning a nomination.
Let's look at some of the exit polling data here, folks.
Some of this stuff is fascinating to me.
Four in ten Republican primary voters, this is in Wisconsin, said that they were scared of what Donald Trump might do in office.
Forty percent of Republican primary voters.
Those numbers, however, went up to six in ten for Cruz and Kasich supporters.
So for example, people that voted for Ted Cruz, six out of ten of them said they were scared of what Trump might do in office ditto for John Kasich.
The Wisconsin GOP scene has been more vehemently anti-Trump than many other states.
And again, that's that's uh I think a factor of this basically becoming a two-man race.
Another notable item in the exit surveys, about half of the Wisconsin voters said they wanted somebody who did have experience in elections.
Well, now wait just a second.
If that's true, if half of the Republican primary voters in Wisconsin, they do want somebody that did have, does have experience in elections, it's almost saying they want somebody that's an insider.
They want somebody that knows the business of politics.
It's certainly not an endorsement of outsiders.
And according to other exit poll analysis, voters seem to be bucking against the sentiments that Trump has expressed recently about withdrawing from NATO and letting Russia do the fighting against NISIS.
In other words, some of the exit poll gate out of Wisconsin.
We don't like that.
We don't like getting out of the world, and we don't like abandoning these security organizations that literally are us.
Half of Wisconsin voters said that they thought the U.S. should be more active in world affairs.
Sixty-six percent of Republican voters made their decision before this week.
Here are some other things.
For the this from John Fund at the National Review Corner.
For the first time in a primary, exit polls showed that Ted Cruz clearly won voters who consider themselves somewhat conservative.
That supposedly is a sign that he can expand his coalition from a hard right base to people that are somewhat conservative.
That's considered to be noteworthy.
That constitutes Cruz broadening his base.
He also performed adequately with Republican moderates, who made up 25% of the electorate in Wisconsin.
Now, Trump normally carries the moderates easily, but last night he won only 40% of their votes.
Cruz got 29, Kasich 28.
That's still a huge Trump win in moderates.
But but fund here saying that the inroads that the Cruz made in that number are huge.
So again, people look at momentum here rather than direct outcome.
John Kasich's voters, I guess there were enough of them to exit poll.
What did what did Kasich get?
Snerdley, do you know what the Okay, so you got 13%?
So there were enough Kasich voters to exit poll.
And Kasich's voters said they were sympathetic to the argument that only Cruz could stop Trump in Wisconsin, but that didn't matter.
They were voting for Kasich anyway.
Trump's signature issues in the exit polls did not play all that well in Wisconsin.
Try this.
Only six percent of voters considered immigration their most important issue.
And among the half of Republicans who thought trade cost American jobs, Trump beat Cruz 43 to 42.
Those are two key issues in the Trump camp.
And there's something that's not exit poll data that's hard polling data.
And that is, I forget the numbers, but in the last six months, which basically would span the campaign.
The support for an actual wall on the Mexican border has gone down significantly.
I I don't have the numbers in front of me and I can't remember all from the top of my head, but it's a significant drop.
So if you add that to only six percent of Wisconsin voters considered immigration their most important.
By the way, that's not unique either.
There have been a couple of other states where immigration is not finished even in the top five, even where Trump is one, even in states where Trump is one.
And I think there might be in that a little bit of uh some sort of effect because the left has portrayed immigration as a racial issue, and a lot of people don't want to go there and don't want people to think so.
That number may be a little bit uh curious.
Also, 35% of Republican voters who thought the most important issue was whether a candidate shared their values.
This question amazes me.
This is I have begun to look at this question in every election exit poll.
If if I can take you back to 2012, this question blank shares my values.
Romney got trounced 81 to 19 on that question by Barack Hussein O. And when I when I saw that in the first wave of exit polls at around 4 o'clock on election day in 2012, that pretty much told me it was over.
That big a spread.
You know, elections, votes are really rooted in a lot of people's case and how people make them feel.
The old actors adage that people never remember what you say, but they will never forget how you make them feel.
When I saw that Obama beat Romney 8119 on the question shares my values, uh-oh.
And here, 35% of Republican voters who thought that was the most important issue.
Trump was crushed.
35% of GOP voters who thought the most important issue was whether a particular candidate shared their values.
He lost that 66% to 11% to Cruz.
Shares my values, Cruz 66%, Trump 11%.
And that's among, again, 35% of people who think it's the most important issue.
That's not everybody.
I got to take a break.
Sit tight.
We'll be right back.
It is the pew research center.
It says the support for the wall is down.
Uh, it was at 48% last September, and it's down now to uh, well, can't find it, but it's below that.
I gotta get to the phones.
Minnetonka, Minnesota.
This is Josh.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello, sir.
Great to be with you, Rosh.
Uh, long time caller.
Uh, just wanted to call and say I'm extremely disappointed in the GOP right now.
We're fighting ourselves, we're taking each other down, and we're not focusing on the big issue, which is Hillary.
And you make that point every day, and it's just, you know, as a strong conservative for, you know, my entire life now and only being 27, it's hard to see my my country in front of me falling apart because you know, my own party can't get its head out of its butt.
Yeah, it's the fact they're not unified against a single thing.
Uh but that look, that happens in primaries, Josh.
What we what we have to hope for is that when this is over And and the rivalry stops being within the party.
We hope then, and we we haven't had this.
We hope then that the party changes its focus to the Democrats.
But the problem is, the last seven years, Josh, there hasn't been.
I got into a huge knockdown drag out last night at the cigar dinner with a Republican establishment, babe, over this very fact about the Republican Party is falling up because they will not push back.
They haven't in seven and a half years, they've not tried to stop one thing Obama's done.
They said they were going to, but they haven't.
And that precedes this primary.
That precedes what's happening in the primary.
The primary, it's understandable you're going to have candidates at each other's throats because they want to win.
This is the first objective right now, and that's winning the nomination.
So that's where the battles are taking place.
I just think that one of the ways of doing that would be out continually saying how you're going to save this country by defeating Democrats.
Because I think that's ultimately what people need and want to hear.
And back to the phones we go, Rush Lynn Baugh.
And the excellence in broadcasting network as usual, uh, talent uh on loan from God, helping me to meet and surpass all audience expectations every day.
Okay, Alan in uh in Madison, Wisconsin.
Great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Yes, sir.
Uh yesterday I voted for Ted Cruz.
Come November.
If it's Cruz, obviously I'll vote for him.
If it's Trump, I will vote for him.
Uh with that being said, I know you don't want to speak overly negative of Trump, because you may offend a lot of your listeners, but I feel that today is a day for you to uphold your duty as a conservative.
Um and I think the reason for that is is because of Trump's statements that he's made about Scott Walker.
You won't find a more conservative governor than Scott Walker.
We got Act Ten, right to work, concealed carry.
And in the radio interview that Donald Trump did in Northern Illinois stating that Scott Walker should have raised taxes.
Um, you know, that he's part of the establishment.
I mean, that's just crazy.
It's crazy to pull in Walker with the establishment with the GOP when Scott Walker has done all of these true conservative things.
And I'm I know that you see it, I know that you know this, and I know you don't want to tick off a large part of your listeners, but I think today's the day that you gotta call out Trump for these ridiculous statements that he's made.
Why?
What what is what what does this accomplish?
You know, you uh first off, what specifically are you referring to that he said about Scott Walker?
Did he say something last night about Walker and his staff that his statement was about and he accused Trump of breaking the law or Cruz of breaking the law with a super pack?
But the statement last night was childish.
I think and and while I was on hold I brought it up.
Trump said, quote, you had a two point two billion budget deficit and the schools were going begging and everything, and everything was going begging because he didn't want to raise taxes because he was going to run for president.
Well, is Trump saying the only race to f the only way to fix a deficit is to raise taxes?
I mean, day one of conservative school, people you understand, you realize, you learn that there's other ways of handling things because raising taxes.
Right.
I mean, what person that identifies themselves as a conservative in their right mind would ever say that.
Somebody who's trying to attract Democrat votes in a crossover primary, who is trying to, in his own maybe questionable view of things, expand the Republican Party.
Is the only thing I can come up with.
Because I I you're talking about those things.
He said those a while ago.
I thought you meant something he said last night that I hadn't yet heard.
Yeah, his his attack on Scott Walker just sits campaigning 101.
He's he thinks.
Trump thinks that a lot of his support is coming from anti-conservative Democrat crossover voters, and he did the same thing in South Carolina.
He just trashed George W. Bush, and I commented on it then.
He trashed George W. Bush.
He was trashing all kinds of things that conservatives believe in, and he's doing it for specific reasons.
Um but I'm telling my condemning it isn't gonna hurt him.
My condemning my condemning Cruz wouldn't hurt him.
Let's put it out there of who he is.
What I do.
Okay.
Which candidates, you know, true conservative candidates, your Scott Walker, your Ted Cruth is have tried to dance around policies and tried to attract voters on the left.
Why don't we just try to teach people what conservativism, because that's what you did for me back in 2008.
I always thought of just as Republican and Democratic parties, but then because of people like you, Mark Belling, I have learned what conservative, what conservatism is.
And that is how I try to speak about politics to other people, is try to teach them what those values are.
Try to educate them and inform them.
And to me, the writing is on the wall, it's clear as day what Donald Trump is.
If we can teach these people, if they're just voting for Trump because he's an outsider, great, that's the right thing.
I'm telling you.
How many times do I have to say this?
You're putting me in a position here sounding like that I am making excuses for things, and I'm not.
I'm telling you that nobody is going to be able to talk Trump supporters out of supporting him by reciting conservatism by telling them, hey, you know what?
This guy's not a conservative.
I can tell him the following.
I can tell a Trump, in fact, let me try it.
I'll do it right now.
To all of you Trump people, let me tell you something.
He doesn't know squat.
Thank you.
He doesn't know anything about how politics works, but that's his appeal.
That is his draw.
I raked him over the coals for his statement on abortion the other day when he in the interview with Chris Matthews.
I called it a disaster.
I am not hiding behind anything here.
And I knew exactly what he was doing.
Donald Trump, and I was criticized for this.
Charles Lane on the The Washington Post on the on the Fox Network accused me of saying that what Trump was doing was pandering.
What I said was that Trump gave an answer that he thinks pro-lifers want to hear.
He thinks, plus he's a law and order guy.
You break the law, you get punished.
You come into the country illegally, you get sent back.
So he's asked a hypothetical about abortion.
What do we do?
Abortion's illegal, Mr. Trump.
What do we do with the war?
We punish him.
His instinct was he's a law and order guy.
Number two, he's a New Yorker.
How many times have I said this?
You're not, you have to listen to this program every day if you're going to be able to understand.
I can't repeat everything every show to make up for people that can't listen every day.
When he made that answer on abortion, I was leading the pack here in talking about how embarrassing it was and why it was damaging, not just to Trump, but to the Republican Party, because he clearly answered that question in a way that he thinks pro-lifers want to hear it answered.
Because he's not.
But when I say that Trump's not a pro-lifer, that's not a criticism.
Trump is not ideological.
He never has been.
It takes all kinds of people in this world.
I'll say it again.
You look at Chuck Schumer and you see a liberal Democrat enemy that's got to be stopped.
He doesn't see Chuck Schumer as a liberal democratic.
He may see him as a Democrat, but he doesn't see him as a liberal.
He doesn't see people as conservatives or liberals.
That's not how he was raised.
It's not how he's lived his life.
Not everybody does.
I wish more people did.
I wish everybody understood what liberalism is and who they are, when you spot them, so that you'll automatically oppose them.
But sadly, not a whole lot of people do.
It's been the quest of this program for 27 years to educate and alert people to liberalism, socialism, communism, all the derivatives, and how to spot it and how to spot them.
Well, Trump is a personality type that doesn't see people that way.
Yet he finds himself in a Republican primary.
And the subject of abortion comes up.
My guess is that Trump's views on this over the past have evolved.
I think more than likely this wild guess here.
But my guess is it hasn't been something that's defined his existence.
He's, you know, it's just something that happens.
He probably abortion happens, it's going to keep happening, no matter what anybody does.
And he's a business guy.
He's not going to get involved in all that.
He probably at some time in his life has probably not been all that favorably disposed to social issues types.
But here he is running in the primary.
So he's got to care about it.
I think over the course of his life, Based on things I've read, I think he has become more pro-life.
I think he has become sensitized to abortion and what it is and partial birth abortion.
He has actively changed his mind on that.
But in terms of having that be in the frontal lobe of his daily existence, it isn't.
He's got other things that define him that make more sense to him that are more important to him.
Lord, if I if I went out and disqualified everybody who isn't a conservative ideologue like I am from being permitted to engage in the political process, where the heck would we be?
So you combine a whole lot of things.
You try to educate people about conservatism so they come to it on their own.
That's been my philosophy.
You don't wag a finger in somebody's face and warn them that they are going to hell if they don't see the light.
You don't tell them how dumb they are.
You don't tell them how stupid they are.
You don't tell them to wake up.
You don't threaten them, you don't blame them.
You just set up circumstances to which the conclusion is obvious and they eventually come to it themselves.
And you stand for it each and every day, and you live your life.
I've had people call me for 27 years.
Rush, what more can I do?
What more can I do to spread the word conservative?
What more can I do?
I don't have a microphone like that.
I said, live your life according to what you believe.
Be an example.
Set an example.
Be a leader in the things that are important to you, and you will influence more people than you will ever know.
I'm very lucky.
I have people like you call and tell me that I'm the reason.
They understand conservatism and became conservative.
But most people, that doesn't happen.
You walk around and wherever you live, on your college campus, at your job, in your town, and you live your life the way you live it, and when these subjects come up, you discuss it.
You'll never know how many people you're influencing, because most of them are not going to come up and say, hey, you know what, Alan?
I used to be a commie SOB blah blah blah.
But listening to you, you made me a you might get that someday, but most people will never tell you.
They'll just people don't want you to think you had to talk them into it.
Most people don't want to admit they didn't understand it.
Most people want you to think they saw it on their own.
Most people want you to think they're bright enough that they don't have to be talked into something.
But you can't at the same time just start disqualifying people because they don't think like you do, especially if they're trending in your direction.
And if they stand for certain things is going to help you accomplish what you want to accomplish.
If they don't pass every litmus test, fine.
You can't you just can't be that exclusionary.
Something I've learned over the course of the career I've had here now indoor 28th year.
But when Trump goes after Scott Walker, I think it speaks for itself.
It's did you not see the results in the primary results last night?
Nobody had to tell them.
And I don't think I've got to prove my bona fides every day here by identifying phony fraud conservatives or fake liberals, whoever they are, each and every day.
Believe me, for 27 years I've been trying to alert everybody listening to what a liberal is, how to spot liberalism and how to never ever support it.
I would be in an insane asylum if I took it personally, how it hasn't worked.
People are who they are.
It takes all kinds.
The low information crowd is specifically low information because they're low information.
They don't know diddly squat.
And no amount of talking to them is going to compl is going to convince them because they don't know they don't know anything.
I can talk about the low information crowd in this audience, and nobody in it thinks I'm talking about them because nobody, oh yeah, I'm one of those.
I'm a know nothing.
Nobody will admit that about themselves.
So they all think I'm talking about somebody else.
Well, some know, but it's a very, very sparse uh number.
I can understand you being upset if Trump had won last night.
I could understand you, whoa, Rush, you really would.
You had a chance, you had a chance, but but you let Trump get away or criticizing Scott Walker's Oranges.
Look Trump.
But Trump lost in a landslide last night.
13 points.
And I'm not surprised.
Scott Walker, you know, here's the thing about the Trump organization.
Somebody needs to get him to say, look, if you want to go after a governor, don't do it in a state where a guy has had to survive three recall elections.
And in doing so, has built up one of the most amazing conservative Republican grassroots-based support systems ever to exist in this country.
You're never going to get a guy like that.
Disqualified, you're never going to get people to believe against that guy after he's done something like the wrong guy to go after.
Scott Walker, of all people.
Scott Walker, to me, has always been the guy who could have shown the rest of the Republican Party how to do it.
That was his big plus to me.
That was his big drawing card.
Certain things speak for themselves.
And the results last night are the uh evidence and the proof of it.
Besides that, Alan, after the first half hour of this program, my own staff was wailing and moaning and crying at me over how excited I seem to be about what happened to Cruz last night.
I'll tell you something else.
Sitting here right now, I know instinctively.
I don't know because I'm in touch with anybody, because I'm not.
But I can tell you right now what's wrong with the Trump campaign.
I can tell you why it's gone off the rails, because it has, and I can tell you what they would have to do to get it back on the rails.
And if I did, I'd never hear the end of it.
I would never hear the end of it.
I would.
How can you, how can you help Trump get?
How can you supposed to be a conservative and Trump is a conservative?
But I can tell I know it we're supposed to have political discussions here.
But I can tell you right now where it's gone off the rails.
I instinctively know.
I'm not, nope.
Nope.
And I tell you what they have to do what they have to do to fix it.
You're agreeing with the premise then that it's off the rails right now.
All right.
Okay, so a Trumpist is agreeing with me that something's wrong.
They haven't won, what is it, four in a row now?
And the branding is win-win-win.
There could be so much winning, people are going to start asking me to lose just so we feel humble.
Well, there hadn't been any winning.
Why?
And it's not obviously it's it's it's not the things that everybody thinks it is.
It's not Michelle Fields.
That may limit growth in in certain way.
But that's the problems, I think uh started before the answers really are to be found in insiderism versus outsiderism.
And the fact that politics, no matter how you play it, still is a business.
And it functions under certain rules.
There's a ladder of success in politics that you climb, and it requires understanding what's on every rung.
And it's really, really hard to jump rungs.
But see, that that is in conflict with why people like an outsider.
They want an outsider to be able to succeed without having to do any of that business of politics stuff.
The minute an outsider starts talking about and working with and setting up offices to get delegates, then the outsiders' supporters, uh-oh.
Is he is he selling us out or is he being suckered in by the establishment or they start being distrustful.
Uh it's it's it's from the beginning of time.
It's the great conflict between an outsider getting someplace in an insider's business.
At some point, the outsiders got to learn some of the requirements that exist in the insider's game, and you have to learn how to pull those off while at the same time maintaining your outside status.
And I think that's what they're afraid of.
I think they're afraid of losing.
They're on the map because they're outsiders.
They're on the map because they're not politicians.
They're on the map because they're not part of that whole system.
And yet they're gonna have to master some of that system.
Even if if they don't get 1237, they're gonna really need to have to master that system.
Because The other guys set that system up, and the other guys write the rules.
And on that, I'll take another obscene profit timeout.
It's also interesting.
I look, I don't mind this discussion, I really don't.
And I know that we're focused on conservatism, the Republican Party here, but man, can you imagine what they're doing on the Democrat side here?
Can you Crazy Bernie keeps winning?
Crazy Bernie keeps demonstrating he doesn't know anything.
▲
Export Selection