All Episodes
Previous Next
March 8, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:43
March 8, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
And it's great to be back here, folks.
Great to be back here in the Excellence in Broadcasting Network of the EIB Southern Command, Rush Limbaugh, as always behind the golden EIB microphone at 800 282-2882 email address if you want to go that way.com.
For those of you watching on the Ditto Cam, you may notice that each and every day there are subtle changes being made in the picture here.
we're changing the lighting day by day, and I have come to find out...
Things are always happening behind my back here.
Well, not everything, but I mean many things go on behind my back here.
And I have learned that associates, we shall call them, are eventually going to push me to apply makeup every day on this program to get rid of the glare on my forehead.
I also have found there have been behind the scenes discussion between the broadcast engineer here and lighting specialists at Fox News in order to uh improve, shall we say, the look of the of the ditto cam.
Now, all fine and dandy, except that it's happening behind my back, which tells me that people are aware I wouldn't be all that supportive of this.
So they're doing they are doing it anyway.
What do you mean tell me if I went to the meetings?
They don't even tell me about the meetings.
And it I know the makeup looks good, but it's a radio show for crying out loud, and it's always going to be a radio show, and I'm not going to let people turn this into a TV show.
The next thing you want to know, they're gonna want a switcher in here where I can play the actual video of audio sound bites, and it's not happening.
There's a reason radio is radio and TV is TV.
Anyway, this the subtle lighting changes on the ditto cam, um, they're good.
I I I have to admit.
Uh still have the forehead shine, and there's nothing to do about that except makeup, and that is not happening.
Okay.
No, it won't stay at a little powder.
It starts out as powder, and then we have a full-time makeup artist in here.
Another commie babe will show up here every day.
I got a debate before I do the program on the makeup goes.
Ah, no, no, no, no, no.
Anyway, um I had a great time yesterday, folks.
More details on this later, but it was the annual Ernie L's for autism.
Uh charity golf tournament at Palm Springs, or at Palm Beach Gardens, it was up at the old palm golf course.
It's uh Raymond Floyd was was one of the developers and designers there, and Lewis Weesthazen was our pro yesterday from South Africa.
What a great time.
One of the most fun days.
Rudy Giuliani was in the force of Marvin Shankin, co-sponsor of the affair with uh with Ernie Elza.
It was a great time.
And uh it was one of these frustrating times, this ball striking was just par excellence.
I was just creaming the ball.
I was I was striping everything, but I wasn't scoring well.
And um and We Stasen took me to say, you know, you're having one of the most frustrating days that we pros can have.
You're hitting the hell out of the ball.
I mean, you're ball striking's great, but you're not scoring.
And it's uh it's true, but uh the ball striking was so good I was happy with that.
It made it it made it fun.
Okay, uh, folks, there's a lot to get to here today.
We've got the Michigan, what is the calling this Little Tuesday?
The Michigan primary, the big one up for grabs today.
And the polling data, it's interesting.
The polling data says that Trump's lead in all the remaining states is narrowing.
In Florida, we had a little intrigue.
Uh CNN had a story saying that Rubio people want Rubio to get out of Florida, leave the campaign before next Tuesday, because he's going to take such a beating that it might be harmful to his reputation.
Get out now, save the reputation, no chance of winning anyway.
Ted Cruz is opening ten campaign offices in Florida this week.
Ted Cruz knows he can't win Florida, but it's obviously designed to take votes away from uh from little Marco.
Quote unquote, I'm just kidding.
Take votes away from from Rubio.
And people say, you know, this is typical, it's typical, it's typical, this is a cruise dirty trick, this is not a cruise dirty trick, this is payback.
Rubio opened a bunch of offices in Texas to try to stop cruise.
That's not dirty tricks, it's politics.
Maybe it's indistinguishable.
But it's not, it's it's not dirty tricks.
Who who put this this Rubio story out?
There's only one source.
CNN claims there's one source, they're relying on one source.
It's it's uh Jamie Gangale.
She says, I got one source here, highly reliable source, the Rubio campaign denying anybody in their camp said anything.
What if it's Ben Carson?
What if Ben Carson wants to have one?
I'm just kidding, but I couldn't help myself.
Any way, interesting uh take take uh on the on the results of the primaries on La Santa were four of them.
See if I can remember.
There was Kentucky, there was Kansas, there was Louisiana, and what is the fourth event, metal block on the uh oh, you know, there's four and there's anyway.
Trump won two and cruise won two.
But here's the thing.
Ted Cruz won all four of them.
If you only count people who voted Saturday, the early voting in all these states in two cases, two states went to Trump.
That was the margin of victory in two of the four states on Saturday for Trump, early voting.
If you just tabulate the votes of people that showed up that day.
Now, this is not to say that that Cruz should have won.
No, that's not the point.
The point is that the late deciders or uh they they are people making up their minds toward the end who uh who voted that day.
So we a statistic like that, according to political professionals, tells you that you can spot a trend.
And it's the drive-bys and the Republican establishment who are trying to tell us what the trend is.
And of course, their interest is for the trend to be away from Trump.
And so, right on schedule, we have a couple of polls today showing Trump's lead in Florida is now no longer double digits.
It's single digits.
In fact, the first poll showed Trump 35, Rubio 30.
It was an ARG poll, American Research Group.
And they are uh what's what's the what's the the word on them?
They're uh they're a specialty group, not not really, I don't think, known in the uh big universe of polling units.
And it was widely thought to be a poll that, as we say here, not really designed to reflect public opinion, but to shape it.
And there's a second poll that's come down the pike, and it's either Monmouth or uh, I forget what Monmouth, that what's it now Trump by eight in Florida, and the same thing's happening supposedly in Michigan, where a once double-digit lead enjoyed by Trump is now whittled down to a single-digit lead, and in Michigan, Kasich is uh is supposedly uh gaining ground in in uh in Michigan.
Is there any somebody told me he's driving around in a mail truck to uh campaign appear?
Is that true or is this somebody just joking with me?
Well, the thing is, you know, the thing is you can I know it's one of those jokes that's rooted in.
Okay, so let's get to the news of the day.
There are a couple of things.
I uh we'll talk about the Fox News appearance uh in in detail with sound bites later.
The two things that I that I want to recite from that appearance.
And the first one is the first point that I made, and I I I really think this is a remarkable thing that's happening that is not being commented on.
It's stunning, really.
Now, I've mentioned it to you before on the program, but I had this the first time I'd made the point on on television, and I had made a point, I decided I was going to lead with this no matter what Chris Wallace's first question was.
And it's this.
I don't know for how many years, but it's it's a number of them, four years, five years.
The Republican Party has been telling its voters that it cannot win, that we cannot win with Republican votes alone.
And I've had candidates, Mitt Romney has been to my office here, so was Rand Paul.
They both said the same thing, and this is not recently Rand Paul maybe a year ago in Romney two or three, but or four years now, but anyway, it's a it's a popularly held axiom in the Republican Party.
They can't win with just Republican votes alone.
And the second part of it is there's a whole bunch of Republican votes that embarrass them, evangelicals, conservatives.
Remember Jeb Bush.
He was going to win the general without winning the primary, meaning he was going to find a way to get the nomination bypassing the Republican base.
We see how that worked out for him.
And this is why we are told the Republican Party must show that it can get along with minorities, that it does not dislike minorities, that it's not racist, sexist, bigoted, homophobic, or what have you.
And therefore, this is why the Republican Party must join with the Democrats and promote amnesty for illegal immigrants for the uh procurement, shall we say, of the Hispanic vote.
And they have openly said to us conservatives who are happy about unhappy about the way they're governing.
They are ignoring their own campaign promises.
They are ignoring the will of Republican voters in the last two midterms, 2010-2014, by telling us, no, no, no, no, we have to branch out.
We have to become a bigger, more inclusive party, right?
Well, as I said on Fox News Sunday, who is it that's actually done that?
It's Donald Trump.
Donald Trump has actually put together the exact kind of coalition.
The Republican Party has been telling us that it needs in order to win, that it will not win if it doesn't succeed in branching out and expanding the party.
And the expansion includes people that were normally qualified as Reagan Democrats, Hispanics, African Americans, women.
Trump is doing it, and there's all mounds of evidence for it.
Let's look at some of the open primaries that have taken place.
A number of Democrats, as we predicted, Trump's going out, he's he's actually playing to them, and they are crossing the aisle and voting for Trump in these primaries.
In closed primaries where they can't cross over and vote for Trump, Republicans are winning those.
Cruz primarily is winning Republican primaries that are closed, like Oklahoma was closed.
Now, Trump is specifically making a play for this group, and in this group of people is white middle class voters who the Democrat Party has written off.
And Dan Balls, I think it was Dan Balls, a former Washington Post columnist, wrote in uh in November of 2000, I think it was 11.
Yeah.
Uh no, no, to yeah, yeah, 2011, that the Democrats plan to white write off white working class votes.
And if you look at Obama's economic policy, look at Obama's Obamacare policy, he's he is.
White working class voters are persona non grata, and Trump's getting them.
He's getting them in droves.
And the Republican Party doesn't want them.
It's the most amazing thing.
Trump is actually putting together what the Republican Party has told us is the coalition they cannot win without.
And now apparently they really don't want to expand the party to include white middle class Democrats, Hispanics, and others from the Democrat Party if Trump is responsible for bringing them.
Thank you.
Look at it this way.
Trump has assembled a package, the GOP says it desperately needs and wants in order to win in the future.
But now they're not interested because they don't like the delivery company.
And I made this point, and I made it big.
And the the second point, and I think that's crucial.
I think it's it because it's an indictment of the current Republican Party.
It's an indictment of the Republican establishment.
It means one of two things.
Either they are just telling us this as an excuse for not implementing policies we have voted for them to implement.
And they really don't mean it.
Or else, they really don't want Trump getting any credit for this.
But here's here's the thing about this.
If you're gonna go out, now follow me on this, folks, do not knee-jerk me on this.
Listen to me.
If you, candidate A, B, if you're Trump, if your crew is, I don't care who you are, and if part of your strategy is to go out and attract Democrat voters to join your Republican base, you can't get them by sounding like a Republican.
If you sound like a Republican, they're not gonna move and join you, right?
This is what we have always objected to the Republicanist.
We've always viewed the Republican establishment as watering itself down, the Republican Party as diluting itself and abandoning its principles in its quest for amnesty and other policy misadventures designed to attract Democrat voters.
If you're gonna go get Democrat voters, you have to speak their language.
And you have to do it in a credible way.
You have to make them think that you get them.
And Trump's doing that.
I have no doubt that's why Trump is harping on Planned Parenthood.
I've no doubt that's why Trump is harping on.
This is what, folks, if the Republican Party were to do, this is what they would have to do to get these voters.
The Republican Party is not going to get a bunch of Hispanics by standing for amnesty alone.
We already have seen that proven.
The Republican Party, if they want to expand their base, if they're being honest with us, they're going and they want liberal Democrats to abandon the Democrat Party and join.
They're not going to do that by espousing conservatism.
Not right now.
Conservatism is not what's going to appeal to these people.
These people are disaffected Democrats.
They're mad at the establishment for their own reasons.
A la the Bernie Sanders phenomena.
Plus, on the Democrat side, there's a just a bunch of people that don't like Hillary to boot.
But my point is that these Republicans are upset the way Trump is attacking George W. Bush and they're attacking Planned Parenthood or defending Planned Parrothood.
I'm asking myself, well, how else are you going to get them?
You know, Republicans, you've got to make up your mind.
You want to be a Republican conservative party.
You want to expand the party on the basis of conservative principles and get somebody in there that knows how to do it.
If you don't have anybody, if you if you're not conservative, if you don't believe conservatism, if you can't sell it because you don't believe it, if you can't articulate it, if you're not happy about it, you're never going to expand the party the right way.
You're going to have to do it the way Trump is.
So why get mad at what Trump's doing when he's doing exactly what you've always claimed you need to win.
Well, I don't like that he's attacking Bush.
And I don't like these defending plan Bush.
Well, I'm sorry, but if that's what if if you want people to cross over and vote for you now and in the general in November.
I thought this is what crossing the aisle meant.
I think Trump's defining it, isn't he?
Crossing the aisle showing he can work with the other side, showing he can engage in compromise.
This is what it looks like, folks.
This is what it looks like.
You know, all of you.
I see the clock.
All of you linguini-spine moderate Republicans who bind to this, we gotta cross the aisle.
We've got to show the other say we can work with them and make Washington work.
And you don't like Trump, well, Trump is Trump is doing exactly what you say you support doing, and you don't like it?
No wonder you're confused.
It's welcome back.
El Rushbaugh and the cutting edge of societal evolution.
So, to sum up, Trump is assembling a coalition beyond Republicans.
A coalition the Republican Party has been saying for years it needs, they've been telling us we got to back off, be patient, understand they gotta branch out.
That's why they gotta go for amnesty and all that.
Uh Trump's doing it.
I saw somewhere where maybe as much as 20% of Trump's support is coming from white working class Democrats, independents, moderates, and so forth.
Exactly what the Republican Party says they need, but they're not happy.
They don't want if Trump's delivery.
But for those of you who think that the Republican Party's right, and you talk about crossing the aisle and think that's a great thing, compromise, get things done.
Well, this is what it looks like.
Crossing the aisle does not mean trying to persuade white working class Democrats of conservatism, which is what Reagan did.
This is not reaching across the aisle and converting.
This is reaching across the aisle and pandering is what the Republican Party is talking about.
That's why so many of its supporters are fit to be tied.
Also, folks, a super secret meeting that has leaked of powerful people designed to stop Trump coming up.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, no, I didn't said I heard about it, and I'm gonna get to it.
No, no, there was a I I guess there was a segment on CNN over the weekend, and a guy named Brett Stevens from the Wall Street Journal was on blaming me for the fact that Trump exists.
Blaming me for not taking Trump out.
Now I have a question to ask based on them.
And then look it.
Is the Wall Street Journal really want to admit that it is powerless to influence thinking in this country?
The Wall Street Journal's been open borders.
Wall Street Journal editorial page has been pro-amnesty for as long as the subject has been around.
They are anti-Trump, and they have said so.
Why isn't that enough?
How come it always comes down to me?
I thought the Wall Street Journal was an opinion news for the editorial page, all kinds of power, lots of influence, big money people read that.
But isn't it fascinating?
That what the journal is doing itself somehow is not enough to stop Trump.
That if I don't do it, it won't be done.
It's kind of it's an interesting admission.
At any rate, uh more on that, and and there's lots of stuff like that yet to come here, folks.
Um we've got news from the weekend to get to and stuff that happened yesterday to get to.
Now, for those of you that are aware of what Romney has done, you know, Romney with his speech, trying to convince Trump voters they're making a mistake and to abandon Trump.
And everybody knows, including Romney, that isn't going to work.
All that's going to do is solidify Trump's support.
So the question, well, why do it?
And the why do it is to set up circumstances where there might be an open convention, and then Romney can set himself up as the fusion candidate to save the day and to end the chaos.
I could imagine Romney wants another go.
I can imagine Romney's looking back at the 2012 campaign and is aware of the mistakes that he made, and that if he hadn't made them, he might be in the Oval Office today.
So I can understand wanting another shot at it.
And I can understand trying to uh massage and maneuver things so that you have a shot at it, even though you haven't participated in the primaries.
You haven't been in the arena in this campaign.
But we will talk about that too as the program unfolds.
But it's not just Romney.
Folks, there's a place in Georgia called Sea Island.
There's been a G7 economic meeting there.
It's a very ritzy and tony place.
It uh was originally built as a golf course development for uh well-to-do upper crust people.
Nothing wrong with that.
The first edition of it didn't make it.
It it it went close to bankrupt, and it had some emergency buyers, three partners, I believe, came in total of 212 million dollars and rebuilt it, and now it's really something.
It's off the coast of Georgia, and you have to be going there to get there.
And it's it's uh it's a five-star place.
Well, it hosted a very what was to have been private Confab recently.
A secret meeting sponsored by a think tank in Washington known as AEI, the American Enterprise Institute.
Now, AEI has a think tank, they're people that sit there and think.
And it's got leftist thinkers, and it's got centrist thinkers, and it's got some right wing thinkers.
Uh it's chairman is someone who uh Arthur Burns has been recently trying to redefine what conservatism is, much the same way the Republican establishment has been trying to redefine conservatism.
It's not what you and I consider it to be.
Anyway, they have an annual meeting called a world forum, world economic forum.
It's it's uh the it's the world forum, AEI's world forum.
It's kind of like their own version of Davos, the World Economic Forum.
At this one, described unimaginatively but accurately as opulent, Sea Island, Georgia hosted a gaggle of Republican leaders and tech CEOs for their annual World Forum of the American Enterprise Institute.
Billionaires, tech CEOs, top members of the Republican establishment flew to a private island resort off the coast of Georgia this past weekend.
The main topic at the close to the media meeting was how to stop Donald Trump.
Some of the powerful people in attendance, Tim Cook, the CEO of Apple, Larry Page, CEO co-founder Google, Napster creator and Facebook investor, Sean Parker, Tesla Motors and Space ex Honcho, Elon Musk, and other tech bigwigs were there.
In addition, Senator Mitch McConnell, political guru Carl Rove, House Speaker Paul Ryan, Republican senators Tom Cotton, Corey Gardner, Tim Scott, Republican Congressman Bob Portman, Ohio, and Ben Sass, Nebraska, were all in attendance.
The main topic again, how to stop the Republican front runner, Donald Trump.
A highlight of the gathering was a presentation by Carl Rove about focus group findings on Trump.
According to Carl Rove, Trump's biggest weakness was that voters have a very hard time envisioning him as presidential and as somebody their children should look up to.
Rove has done extensive focus group data research and polling data and has put together this profile of Trump, and he shared the data and the results with the high-tech CEOs and the political big.
There were no media at this thing, no dry button, like no media CEOs, no media reporters, no big time anchors.
I mean, you know, when Allen and Company does their thing out at Sun Valley, always have at least Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose there, but they didn't even make the cut for this thing.
And Rove's presentation zeroed in on the fact that even people that like Trump don't consider him presidential, or somebody that their children should look up to.
Sources familiar and the meeting, by the way, has now been widely reported, but the news of the meeting was broken on the Huffing and Puffington Post.
They were the first to report it.
Sources familiar with the meeting, who requested anonymity because the forum is off the record, said that much of the conversation around Trump centered on how this happened, rather than how are we going to stop him?
In other words, it was a circle.
And they were sitting around the circle.
And they were all telling each other or asking each other, how the hell did this happen?
And it's an understandable thing.
They think they run the world.
They think they control these things.
And out of the blue comes the Trumpster.
And so they were in this circle, trying to explain to each other how it happened.
And then they did eventually get into what they can do to stop Donald Trump.
Oh, I take it back.
Pardon me for a moment.
I did make an error.
There was indeed a media person there.
I forgot.
It was Bill Kristol of the Weekly Standard.
A specter was haunting the world for him, the specter of Donald Trump, Bill Kristol wrote in an emailed report from the conference, borrowing the opening lines of the communist manifesto.
There was much unhappiness about Trump's emergence, a good deal of talk, some of it insightful and thoughtful about why Trump has done so well, and many expressions of hope that he would be defeated.
The key task now, wrote Crystal, to once again paraphrase Karl Marx, is less to understand Trump than to stop him.
In general, there's a little too much hand wringing, brow furrowing, and fatalism out there.
Not quite enough resolving to save the party from nominating or the country electing someone who simply should not be president, according to the people at this secret super secret meeting.
They have decided Trump should not be president.
They met to explain to each other how it happened first, and then to share with each other ideas on how to stop Trump.
Now, clearly, given the names that you would think the largest percentage here would have been Republicans, but when you look at the Google guys and the Apple CEO and Sean Parker, I mean, and then the Google, there's all kinds of leftists at this thing, too.
I guess they know how to cross the aisle that the Republican established knew how to bring the tech guys in.
Clearly, the tech guys were there to offer some tech suggestions on stopping Trump.
And again, a highlight of the gathering was a presentation by Carl Rove about focus group findings on Trump.
Greatest weakness, doesn't look presidential, not somebody their children should look up to.
They also see him.
Roe's research on Trump supporters says they also see Trump as somebody who can be erratic and should not have his fingers anywhere near the nuclear trigger.
This sounds exactly what these people said about Ronald Reagan.
It's uncanny.
The same kind of people, not these same people, obviously, Same kind of people with the same exact kind of thing.
We don't want to be anywhere near Rev Reagan anywhere near the nuclear button.
By the way, back to Romney for a second before I go to the break.
Another point that I made on the Fox News Sunday program.
Romney's father, George Romney, did this identical thing to Barry Goldwater in 1964.
George Romney was part of a combat, a cabal of Republican establishment types, appalled at conservatism, scared to death, angry, afraid to death of Goldwater.
They just could not stand that he was going to be the nominee.
And George Romney went out and campaigned and did as much as he could to undermine the Goldwater campaign.
Now the mistake here, those people back then thought that they were doing and did do a great thing when they undermined.
And they did undermine the Goldwater Camp.
Well, Goldwater was not going to win.
Nobody was going to beat LBJ coming off the JFK assassination.
But they did undermine Goldwater.
And in their view, in their short-minded view, they succeeded.
They s they stopped conservatism in its tracks, but they forgot that Reagan gave that great speech at time for choosing.
And it was the gold water emergence, and you have defeat.
That created the modern day conservative political movement.
There was a conservative ideological movement that had been begun by William F. Buckley.
But now it became a political and electable movement begun with Goldwater's loss, but signaled and heralded by Reagan's speech.
And had not there been a Goldwater, there would not have been a Reagan in 1980 or 1976.
But they're these guys, Mitt Romney, George, they're out there telling themselves what successful thing they did back in 1964.
That remains their frame of reference for conservatism.
Conservative candidate, conservative nominee, equals landslide laws.
They don't see two state landslide, 49 state landslide victory twice by Reagan.
They were opposed to conservatism in 1964.
They were opposed to an outsider trying to get in their establishment tent in 1964.
And the son of George Romney, Mitt Romney, tries the same thing last week to keep a new outsider from getting inside the establishment tent.
And now this super secret meeting.
You know, I think news of this meeting, depending on how widespread it gets, could actually affect voting today.
Because this is the kind of stuff, if people are wavering away from Trump for whatever it is, hearing this could send them right back in a lickety split second if they find out about it.
I'll tell you what, the Huffing and Puffington Post did.
They went to the FAA and they they tracked, dude, you can track the various apps and websites, uh, incoming and outgoing traffic at airports, and they tracked uh FAA records available at FlightAware.com, which is a great app tracking your airline flight and mapping it out where it is and so forth.
Anyway, a fleet of private jets flew into and out of two small airports near Sea Island, Georgia this week, and 54 planes flew out of the airport on Sunday.
Nearly four times as many departed from the airport the previous Sunday.
Uh and they knew where they went to San Jose, California.
They went to the state of Washington, they went to New York.
They knew where they went.
It's how they confirmed who was there at this uh at this meeting.
Here's Kent in Chicago.
Kent, you're up first today as we go into the phones, and it's great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Hey Rush, great honor.
Twenty-five probably year listener, and uh always a pleasure when I get an opportunity to talk to you.
Um I'm a Reagan conservative voter.
I voted for Reagan in the second election as a child, uh Jimmy Carter horrified me.
And all of my friends, everybody I know is a conservative Republican.
And the thing that I'm absolutely astounded by.
You know, I just got looked through listening to Bobby Gendal, talk to Bill O'Reilly.
And he couldn't even grasp the concept of if Donald Trump gets nomination.
These, you know, people that talk about all these establishment, quote unquote talking heads, talk about conservatism in an idealistic way.
It's not in a real world way about having somebody, you know, be there.
Like you understand conservatives like I do, like all of my friends do.
You know what it you know, if we lose this election, Rush, this country is gone forever.
This is our last greatest hope to try to get this country back.
And the people have an idealistic view on what conservatism should be, not what it actually will be, and what it will be is whatever it is.
It's not what we want it to be.
You gotta take what you get when you get it.
Okay, I'm I'm confused.
What what what what was the point about Gendal and O'Reilly?
Bill O'Reilly asked Fabi Gendal if Donald Trump was a nominee.
And Bobby Gendal basically ignored it and started talking about Ted Cruz, and Bill O'Reilly kind of got him back on point and said, Listen, you know, it what uh we're talking about the real world.
If he is a nominee, and Bobby Gendal, in the end, accepted the promise and said I'd vote for him.
But the problem is that all of these establishment people don't even want to accept the concept of Donald Trump getting the nomination.
They can't um I'm out of time here.
Um and I'm I'm gonna have to try to figure out what what you're asking me, which I will do, and I'll comment on it the next chance I've got here the next couple of minutes so.
Uh if I had more time, I could grill down deeper with you here and find I know.
I gotta go, I gotta hit the break here.
I'll tell you something else about this super secret American Enterprise Institute Forum at Sea Island, Georgia.
You've got all these tech CEOs and all these left-wing uh inventors and tech people with these Republicans?
What's going on?
That's crony capitalism right in front of your face.
Or crony socialism, maybe, whatever.
▲
Export Selection