All Episodes
Previous Next
March 2, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:51
March 2, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Wait, I just heard something I needed I need to double check.
I just heard that Trump is over 300 delegates right now, and I don't have that number.
I've got Trump at around 285.
285, okay.
So I heard that three, he's not north of 300 yet.
He was in fact, that's actually a pretty important number.
There were a lot of people expecting him to be north of 300 after last night, and he's not.
Anyway, here we are, folks.
You have come to the one place you know you can count on to make sense of all this with honest appraisals of everything that you saw and happen last night.
Right here at the Rush Limbaugh program and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies, the telephone number, if you want to join us, 800-282882, and the email address, L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
All right.
Nate Silver's site says that Trump has 32 delegates right now, Cruz at 221.
These are nowhere near the numbers that I got earlier this morning.
And now I'm confused.
Well, anyway, the point will still hold.
Because if you if you have you take Trump's delegates, let's let's let's do what I have here first, 285.
I'm gonna explain to you why this thing, why everybody's gonna stay in this.
To the consternation of you can't believe how many people.
The numbers that I had going into the program today, 285 for Trump, 160 for Cruz, 87 for Rubio, 25 for Kasich, and eight for Carson.
Now, if you look at it a different way, you've got Trump at 285 and the field at 280.
And that's why nobody's getting out.
And the uh Tom DeLay was on uh PMSNBC last night, a lot of establishment types are out there actually pushing the following theory that as long as these people stay in, that's now the objective for Rubio to stay in, for Cruz to stay in.
You might have heard otherwise that there's a desire for one of these two to get out and everybody to unify and go head to head against Trump.
And there are some people that want to do that, but the contra theory to that, the other list, the Nate Silver list is Trump 332, Cruz 221, and Rubio 115, that would mean that Rubio and Cruz combined have more delegates than than Trump has by uh by four So either way,
you you you see here that that the opposition to Trump is still at or near his total.
New York Times is reporting Look at this.
The New York Times is saying 316 for Trump, 226 for Cruz, and 106 for Rubio.
So I've got three different delegate counts here, but the the whole the point still holds because the the the first leg of the theory is that it's not the states that you win going in, it is the delegates, of course, and the number is 1,237 that the any Republican needs to win this thing.
And the more delegates Trump does not win, the greater the likelihood he would arrive in Cleveland short of the 1,237.
And if that happens, if nobody shows up to the convention with 1,237 in the first vote, those delegates are pledged, but then after the first vote where nobody gets to win, and and you can guarantee that when the horse trading begins, Trump would be in there doing his famous deal making.
So once the second vote starts, it's free-for-all.
Anyone can vote for anybody.
I mean, there might be a few short small number pledged delegates.
So the the objective here is one of two ways.
Either keep everybody in this for as long as the money makes it possible, and deny Trump 1,237 delegates.
And that theory admits that nobody can beat him.
That theory admits that nobody else can get there either.
The uh and then throw this open to a second vote, and once that happens, then all bets are off.
And you could have not a brokered convention, but you have the horse trading that would go on.
The other the other scenario is that uh Cruz and Rubio get together and and one of them decide that the other can't make it, and that the and and Kasich, the drive by's and the establishment really mad at Casey today because they think if Kasich had gotten out by now that Rubio would have won Virginia.
I mean, that's how that's how minute this is.
Here's a guy has not yet well, I did win a state.
He won Minnesota.
You know, this is interesting, too.
Rubio wins Minnesota, the only state Reagan lost in a landslide 1984 against Walter F. Mondo.
Mondo from Minnesota won his own state.
Rubio, said to be a Reaganite, goes to Minnesota, wins where Reagan didn't, and loses everywhere else Reagan won.
And it happens to be a caucus state, Minnesota, which is pretty much a left-wing leaning state.
The uh the other objective is for one of these two guys to get out and the party to unify against Trump.
And then that brings in something that Lindsay Gramnesty said, because you've got two options here.
You've got uniting behind Rubio, which right now is what the establishment would prefer to do and what they're trying to do, but it didn't.
I don't care how they try to spin this.
It was not a good night for Rubio last night.
A lot of people on the Rubio side that obviously are trying to spin this as a uh a night where he did better than was thought, but he didn't even reach the 20% threshold in a number of states to even get some delegates there.
Uh and they're they're holding on Virginia.
Hey, look at Virginia, look at Virginia.
If Kasich hadn't been there, why would it would have won Virginia?
They point to one state they might have won had Kasich not been in.
And this is the guy they're trying to tout as the actual winner, the guy of the rest of the field that is the legitimate choice to take down Trump.
And the reason for that is they despise Cruz.
They literally hate Cruz.
Ted Cruz had a had a good night last night.
Now, if you measure it against expectations, you know, going in, he was going to uh sweep Super Tuesday.
This is before Trump got in and screwed everything up, but he's going to sweep Super Tuesday.
And last night was the night Ted Cruz was going to effectively have nailed down the nomination before Trump got in and changed the dynamics of everything.
And a lot of things became clear to me last night as I listened to the post of well, as the candidates spoke.
I a lot of things came into focus for me last night about what they're doing right, what they're doing wrong, and I will share as much of that as time permits as the program unfolds today.
So the uh theory is that you get one of these two guys pull out and they go head to head with Trump and try to win this thing before you get to Cleveland.
And Lindsay Gramnesty actually said on CBS last night, if Marco doesn't win Florida on the 15th, I don't know how Marco does it.
I don't know how Marco goes for it.
Ted Cruz is not my favorite by any means, but we may be in a position where we have to rally around Ted Cruz as the only way to stop Donald Trump.
And I'm not so sure that would work.
For them to say that, they are panicked even more than I thought they were.
If they're actually talking about aligning behind Ted Cruz, they I thought if the uh establishment had to make a choice, they would choose Trump simply because they think Trump has the constituency that they claim that they would like, or they they've claimed in recent years they think they need in order to win consistently, a broad-based coalition.
And they think Trump is malleable.
You've heard that word going around that Trump will negotiate and make deals, and he's not nearly as ideologically locked into things as Cruz is.
Therefore, Cruz intractable, inflexible, we can't work with him, plus he's the worst of all worlds, being a uh legitimate Christian conservative.
And for Lindsay Gramnesty to come out and say they might have to coalesce behind Cruz kind of took me by surprise because I really thought if anything like that happened, they would uh they would choose Trump.
The other thing, folks, I uh last night Trump did something that uh he hasn't done before, and rather than do a victory celebration, he did a press conference.
The press conference was scheduled for 9 p.m.
There was a rumor floating around that the press conference would feature a major blockbuster announcement.
And the media started circulating a rumor that the major blockbuster announcement would be the endorsement of Trump by the Florida governor Rick Scott.
I was telling people, well, no, I don't think that's a blockbuster.
People disagreed with me.
What do you mean?
It's the governor of Florida.
He's in Florida.
Florida's in two weeks.
Remember what Christ endorsing McCain did.
Yeah, I know, but this doesn't, it doesn't seem to say.
It turned out to not happen.
What did happen, Rubio made sure to show up at 9 o'clock, beating Trump to the microphone.
I don't know whether that was planned.
My guess is that it was.
And it is clear to me that Marco Rubio is trying to get under Trump's skin for this debate tomorrow night.
It is clear to me, this constant accusation that he's a con man, referring to him as a con man and accusing him of all kinds of stuff.
It is designed, I think, to drive Trump crazy.
I think he's hoping and angling for a Trump explosion on the debate stage in Detroit tomorrow night.
But it seemed over the top to me.
It seemed just a little bit beyond what I would call within the realm of reality.
It seemed overly contrived and provocative.
And look, I I don't blame these guys for when in the midst of disappointing losses trying to spin it and make it look like there's all kinds of positives here and they're winning.
It's all about perception and and and uh and momentum.
And I totally understand it, but there does come a point where you you have to know whether or not somebody's grounded in reality at the same time.
Remember, Clint Eastwood's old philosophy, a man's got to know his limitations.
And that's in direct conflict with the power of positive thinking and never giving up.
But there are positive arguments to make in both sentiments.
You have to know your limitations, but you never ever give up either.
They seem conflicting and contradictory, but used properly, they're not.
Well, then Trump came out when Rubio was finished.
Contrast couldn't have been greater.
Rubio appears to be in a barn with average ordinary people, it's a barn or a cigar factory down in Miami.
Here comes Trump in the ballroom at Marilago, which is decorated like the Palace of Versailles.
And Trump comes out and does a press conference.
Not a victory celebration of any kind.
And if I had one person observe to me, I had 15 observe to me, my God, the guy looks more presidential tonight than I've ever seen.
He's reasonable sounding, his temperament is perfectly composed.
He hasn't insulted anybody, he looks confident and ready to go and so forth.
But standing behind his right shoulder was the governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, who, six New Jersey newspapers, have demanded resign.
They claim that Christie has totally abandoned the state of New Jersey, the people of the state of New Jersey for his own quixotic dreams.
He's seeking fame and fortune, knowing full well his elected political career is over.
If he's not going to come back and finish out his term and be responsible, fulfilling his duties as governor, then he should just resign and go be Trump's puppy dog or something like that.
Now, Governor Christie's not used to being a background person.
He's not used to being unnoticed.
He's not used to being second fiddle.
And however it was planned and however it worked out, he appeared to be a decoration last night.
Standing behind Trump's right shoulder while Trump is at his podium coming off as more presidential than he has to date at any time, maybe a couple other times.
But last night, consistently the most uh within boundaries.
He was reserved, he was substantive, he was contained.
He was not all over the place bouncing off walls and so forth.
He basically eliminated a stream of consciousness that usually guide his appearances, and stuck to a script of sorts in terms of messaging.
That there was poor Christie standing behind him, not knowing what to do.
His eyes are darting around like he's waiting for a chandelier to fall on him or something.
He's standing behind Trump thinking, My God, is there a sniper out there?
Do I need to be on a look?
It looked totally uncomfortable.
Looked to me like it was uh the hostage video.
But the drive-bys are obsessed with it.
The drive-by's are totally obsessed with this today.
They can't, I mean, it's it it arguably is one of the biggest stories throughout the drive-by media today.
And this is from the same people who lecture all of us about our politics turning unserious and surface no depth, and here they are focusing on this because they would love to embarrass Christie.
They would do anything they could to diminish his reputation, his image, and so forth.
And they claim that they've been able to do it here with these shots.
I mean, their Twitter and Facebook and Instagram of these various poses that Christie made.
I mean, he was Trump went, what, 45 minutes?
Trump had one of his sons, I think Eric was also on stage, but Eric was wisely out of the camera shot.
So it was just Trump and Christie.
And the contrast here, mention this to you, Rubio goes first, and he's just launching into Trump, and Trump is this or that.
Have I got this order wrong?
Did Trump go first or was it Rubio that went first?
Last night.
Do you recall?
Rubio went first.
Yeah, okay.
Yep.
Ruby, yeah, he was back when interview sessions went, but I mean his appearance now that is as he okay, yeah, and he was just, I mean, laying into Trump like a continuation of the last debate.
Con man this, con man here, liar this, liar that.
It was just brutal.
And Trump shows up and is mild-mannered and presidential and acting like an adult.
And he was even conciliatory to Cruz.
He praised Cruz, at least Cruz has won something.
I know how hard it is to win, Cruz said.
I have a lot of respect for Ted Cruz.
He's worked very hard winning is really hard.
Marco poor Marco hasn't won anything.
He laid into Rubio a little bit, but the contrast was striking to me.
I even thought Cruz was I see the clock.
I know, I know, I know.
Gotta take a break, folks.
Back in a sec.
Okay, the delegate math.
It's confusing.
It's it depends on where you go.
Every site has a different number because they're combining actual delegates with estimates because there's still some uncounted votes and other vagaries out there that make it hard to nail it down.
But the looks like a solid bottom line is to say that Trump is north of 300.
Now it's the number sticks in my head because I remember so many people talking last night as I was flipping around various networks watching post-election analysis, that if Trump was under 300, it wasn't bad, but it was below expectations.
Everything is an expectations game now.
It's an expectations game with Rubio in Florida on the 15th.
It's an expectations game with uh with Cruz.
He didn't fulfill them.
He didn't meet them according to what his own expectations were, his own guidance, if you will, was.
Uh and Trump was supposed to run the table last night according to the polling data, and he didn't in some places, even read One place today, somebody thinks it was very smart.
Maybe Charlie Hurt at the Washington Times, who has a story, Trump's winning streak baffles GOP losing club for losers.
The theory that uh that Trump let Cruz win in Texas.
The theory that Trump wanted Cruz to win in Texas, therefore didn't really go in and contest Texas much because he wants the field to remain crowded.
But the upshot of all this is that the hope of the establishment is that Trump, and I've heard a number of people say this last night, and we're still working it out ourselves here.
This is such a convoluted attempt here to unravel.
It's an intricately woven web of deceit, this delegate stuff.
The objective here is to keep Trump short of 1,237 before everybody gets to Cleveland this summer.
That seems to be the objective now among some.
Yes, sir, Rebob, here we are, the fastest week in media already at Wednesday, folks.
It's great to have you here, Ill Rushbow.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
So here are the three different strategies that are being bandied about on the Republican side, all focused on stopping Trump.
Plan A, sit tight, let things go on as they are, and don't try to influence anything.
Rubio sinks or swims on his own cruise ditto.
They hope that Casey gets out and Carson non factors get him out as soon as they can.
But other than that, sit on everything and wait for Trump to implode.
Wait for Trump to collapse.
Now, before you Trumpists get all mad at me, I'm just telling you what the establishment strategy is.
And I can detect it because I listened to them talk last night.
You know who there's who's speaking and where they're coming from.
You can put two and two together, get four easily.
And when you hear these establishment types say, well, you know, Trump is underperforming.
Well, you know, Trump's not nearly as far ahead as everybody thought he would be.
Well, you know, with every one of these victories, Trump is not expanding his momentum.
Now, very little of that is actually true.
But truth is not what any of this is about.
Just like truth is very rarely about the outcome in court.
This is all about perceptions.
It's all about momentum, it's all about feelings combined with perceptions and so forth.
Because there are still a lot of votes to happen.
There's still a lot of states uh uh yet to have their primaries yet.
And so creating impressions and mindsets, and that's that's what strategy A is uh is all about.
And and believe me, there are a lot of people in the establishment that are still in complete denial.
They still believe that Trump's not going to be in Cleveland.
They still think that something's gonna happen.
Either he is going to cross a threshold that even his supporters will not stick with him on, or that he's gonna quit.
Something's gonna happen, and he's gonna realize he's not gonna win, he's gonna quit, or he's got some other objective that nobody knows, and at some point he's gonna have met that objective and then quit.
I mean, it's silly, but that's part and parcel of the first part of the three-pronged strategy.
Plan B is to clear the field of everybody but Rubio.
They do not want to unify behind Cruz.
That would be their smartest move, but they will not do that.
They actually, plan B is oriented around getting everybody to drop out, and then the party unifying behind the guy who has won one state and did not reach the 20% threshold in a couple of states, meaning he didn't get any delegates in those states last night.
That would be that would be Rubio.
And Rubio is the desired candidate because that's where the moneyed people want to go.
He's closer to the establishment, this whole gang of ape business.
Cruz is genuinely the I mean, you be Trumpsters uh think Trump owns this outsider business.
Cruz is more of an outsider than you know in terms of the way the Republican establishment disdains him, doesn't like him, fears him, hates him.
They just he's so much of what they don't want.
They don't want conservatism in the party.
They don't want evangelicals prominent in the party.
Uh they don't want anybody talking about Judeo-Christian ethics and morality and conservative.
They're trying to sweep that out of the party ever since Goldwater.
The third prong of the strategy.
Keep everybody in.
So that Trump does not accrue the minimum requirement of 1,237 delegates going into Cleveland.
The way that would work is if if that if that happens, if nobody has 1,237 on the first vote, delegates are pledged, and pretty much would have to vote the way everybody knows they're going to vote because of the primary results.
But after that, then it's wide open.
And that point wouldn't be brokered.
Brokered means that powerful people in smoke-filled rooms are denying delegates the right to participate in the process.
That wouldn't be the case.
There would be all kinds of horse trading going on and bickering and arguing, Trump included.
And if Trump, what is he, let's say he shows up and he's 15 or 20 delegates short or 30, he's going to say, I could find those, I can find those, I get those away from somebody easily.
So but those are the three strategies that the GOP establishment is relying on now.
And I don't know which one they're going to decide on.
They may decide different factions in all three.
And more will become clear as uh future primaries.
This is another slew of states on Saturday, and then on um the 15th of March, uh, we have Florida and Ohio, those are the those are the biggies.
Now, another interesting point about all of this as it relates to delegates, folks.
I think after Saturday, I I could maybe need to be corrected on this, but at some point very soon, all of the remaining primaries are closed, which means Democrats and independents cannot cross over and vote in the Republican primaries.
And that is also a factor in the Republican establishment's strategy because they uh are realizing or theorizing that Trump is picking up a lot of votes from uh leftists, progressive Democrats, liberals, and independents, did so in South Carolina, some other states uh yesterday and last night.
But when you get to the closed primaries, one of the examples given of a closed price.
Oklahoma last night was a closed primary, and Trump lost it.
So the establishing, see, see, when it's just Republicans voting, we can beat Trump.
So they're relying on all kinds of uh what you characterize, hopeful analyses to tell themselves that there are ways to stop Trump here.
Now that leads, last night in Trump's press conference, once again, he comes up with Planned Parenthood.
He's gay, gets a question about Planned Parenthood, and he's not wavering from this.
And people are misunderstanding what's happening.
I was in the South Carolina debate, I was taken aback when I saw Trump go on and on about Planned Parenthood.
That was the debate where he accused Bush of knowing in advance in 9-11, knowing that there were no weapons of mass destruction.
I mean, all this stuff that left-wingers say, or the radical left wingers say, Trump's out there saying it, and then I realize what's going on.
It's an open primary Democrats can cross over and vote.
But actually, it's even more than that.
There's a story, there's two stories here today.
One of them is in the um politico, the media's Trump reckoning everybody was wrong.
And this story is a review of a number of bold name, very well known, drive by media reporters and analysts, having to eat crow, goes back and cites all these different people who said Trump was a one month wonder, a two week wonder, he's not gonna last, he's gonna implode, Trump's gonna blow it, Trump's this, he's not gonna be a factor.
This story goes back, talks to many of those people, and asks them what did they do wrong.
And they all admit they got it wrong.
And the political concludes that everybody was wrong.
Everybody was not wrong.
I did not think that Trump was going to implode.
I was one of the first people to tell you that this was going to resonate.
Even on June 16th, during that outrageous introductory speech.
I warned everybody this was going to resonate with people.
Back when everybody was laughing at off, this is a joke.
This is uh this is this this is back then the establishment was all right, all right.
This is great.
This is gonna make Jeb look even more presidential.
This is gonna make Jeb look even better, because Trump's looking like a genuine insane lunatic.
And I said, nope, nope, that's not that you're you're misreading this.
This is gonna resonate.
And I think it's gonna resonate because of immigration.
Oh, remind me, I don't want to get sidetracked right now.
The exit polls do not show immigration as a top three issue in many of these states.
Remind me to talk about that.
The second thing that's going on here, and I also referenced this within the past couple weeks.
Coco, do a site search.
Find out the actual date I mentioned this, because I mentioned in passing that certain things that have happened and things that Trump said made me realize he's been planning this for years.
This is something Trump has been planning for years.
Now I'll give you a little hint why I I forget what it was that was the catalyst that made me realize that, but it forced me to remember some things.
And it was uh probably a conversation about does Trump really want this?
Is he really gonna stay in this?
Can we trust Trump what he's saying?
It was a conversation like that.
And I might it might have been even with a caller, but I made the point, I think he's been thinking about this a lot longer than anybody thinks.
I don't think this is a snap decision.
The reason I said this, you know, I've I've played, and don't misunderstand me here, but I've uh I've played golf with Trump a number of times, and each time I've played, politics, of course, is one of the primary subjects.
And I remember on two separate occasions, he was really, really curious, wanted to know in detail why I moved to Florida from New York.
What was it about New York taxes?
And then he admitted, you know, I rush, I have to tell you a lot of people tell me the same thing.
They're thinking to leave and they can't handle it anymore.
It's just that's this is just the last two or three years.
Um and then many in-depth discussions about Obama.
Uh it's a bad guy, right?
Russia's a bad guy.
What kind of guy you think Obama is?
And it was a uh back and forth.
It was he was acutely interested.
This was not just idle chatter during a round of golf.
It was pretty focused and intent.
Although I didn't attach this kind of meaning to it.
There was at no point that I ever think, my God, this guy sounds like he's naked or running.
I just thought it was somebody that was deeply interested and talking about things that you don't normally hear him talk about in uh in public.
But now that looking back on everything that's happened, I think two or three years ago he's planning this.
Two or three years ago plotting and consent and strategizing and learning and formulating thoughts, this, that, and the other.
And I think that's what this planned parent stuff here, planned parenthood stuff is all that stuff that happened in the South Carolina primary.
I think what it means is that Trump already thinks in terms of being the nominee.
I think he's been running a presidential, a national presidential campaign for a while now.
In other words, I think he's been focused on Hillary.
I don't I don't think his real focus has just been on Cruz or Jeb or Rubio particularly after the uh first couple of months when his poll numbers are through the roof and nobody else is getting any traction whatsoever.
And his level of confidence.
And last night mentioned Planned Parenthood again.
And in that answer on Planned Parenthood, he he kind of gave something away.
He talks about, yeah, the so-called conservatives, they've and he caught himself.
But I'm a conservative, I'm a common sense conservative, so-called conservatives.
There was a there that means there is a uh, wouldn't go so far to call foul taste in his mouth about this, but but clearly uh he's got some discomfort problems with rock ribbed, I mean super serious ideological conservatives.
Much like the Republican establishment does, by the way.
That's what makes them nervous about Cruz.
Nobody's that way.
Nobody's this earnest and ideological in everything they say or do, it makes us uncomfortable, they say.
But his continuing support of Planned Parenthood and his reasons why.
They do great health things for women.
He acknowledges abortion's no way we're gonna defund them because of that, but he folks, he's running a national campaign here, and he's talking about broadening the base.
Last night we're gonna unify.
He last night he acknowledged.
He acknowledged a point that I've been trying to make to everybody here for weeks now, and that is that he has put together a coalition that's way beyond the Republican base.
It's way beyond a conservative Republican base.
He's got every ethnicity and demographic and every age group and every income bracket in his support.
This is exactly what the Republican Party's been telling us they need to do to win while they tell us conservatives to shut up and go away, that they can't win with us alone.
Trump's done it.
And he's continuing to, because he's running his national campaign right now.
And he fully intended.
He's told me I'm I'm making the party bigger.
I'm enlarging the party, I'm making it bigger, I'm growing the party, exactly what everybody says needs to happen.
And you watch them on the unified point.
I know, I know.
Back in a sec here, folks.
Don't go away.
Now wait.
Before everybody goes and blows a gasket out there.
I am going to be talking about the Cruz victory in Texas and the Cruz victory in Oklahoma.
There's three hours here.
So don't jump to any conclusions.
Let me tell you about this closed primary bill.
The next four.
GOP primaries.
There are four of them on uh Saturday, March the 5th.
I think it's four.
Anyway, these four are closed.
Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, and Maine.
And remember the establishment theory.
Oklahoma, closed primary.
Cruz wins, Trump loses.
Establishment theory is closed primaries, Republicans only, Trump will not win.
This is what they're telling themselves.
Remember, they're three-pronged strategy here.
That they're uh scratching their own backs with to try to tell themselves they're still in this, that they haven't lost anything, and that they can still prevent Trump from running away with it.
Also, unless something of great magnitude happens, I have agreed to appear again on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace.
And this time we're not going to tape it.
Uh they asked me to tape it at 3.30.
I won't be able to tape it at 3.30.
I said, as soon as I could tape, it's 5 o'clock.
They said, let's just do it live.
I said, fine.
It's more exciting when it's live.
And I said, Chris, don't forget my idea last time.
Have me on as your guest.
Take a couple commercial breaks and bring me back as the panel to analyze myself.
It has never been done on TV before.
Have me on as the guest, and you and I analyze what I said.
And who knows?
I might disagree with myself, as I hear myself say something.
It's very rare, but he laughed and said, We'll see you Sunday at night.
Also, there's other it would be fun.
You have to admit that would be fun.
There are other things out there, folks, that have little to do with any of this.
And I do want to try to get to some of these today.
Bin Laden called for Americans to rise up over climate change.
Uh back in 2010 or 2000, 2011 or something.
Point is he sounds just like any Democrat today.
Sounds just like any Democrat.
Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio at the Oscars, just like any Democrat talking about climate change global warming.
New York City, you will no longer get arrested for public boozing or urinating in public in Manhattan anymore.
It's called Defining deviancy down.
It's called Blowing Up the Broken Windows Scheme, which is an unfortunate thing.
This is this is basically saying, you know what?
People want to trash our city.
We're not gonna stop them.
Poverty up, services diminished in Chicago's black neighborhoods.
After seven years of Barack Obama, it's worse than ever for African Americans in his hometown.
And there's even more, but we gotta take another break here.
This delegate stuff.
I have spent while doing this program, I've spent the last 30 minutes going back and forth with people on the delegate count, and they still can't make me understand it.
And I still don't know what numbers to give you.
New York Times and Nate Silver say one thing, but over here something totally different.
Politico's got another political what?
Same as the New York Times.
Well, I hate the New York Times may have it right.
▲
Export Selection