All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 24, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:08
February 24, 2016, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
No, no, you tell him to be patient.
I told him it's coming up.
I'll get to it when I get to it.
Just tell him to.
You just tell him to hang on.
Have I ever not come through on this?
Right.
Okay, great.
Okay.
Thanks.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome back.
Great to have you, Rush Limboy here behind a golden EIB microphone.
The telephone number is 800-282-2882.
The email address L Rushbo at EIB net.com.
Al Sharpton.
You know, we talked with the Republicans earlier.
The Democrat uh primary.
I mean, Bernie's fading out of Bernie's already, he's for all intents and purposes, he's conceding and surrendering in South Carolina.
And uh and moving on.
And the Democrat turnout, I mean, his crowds may be big, but the turnout at Democrat primaries is way down there.
There just isn't anywhere near the emotion on the Democrat side as there is on the Republican side.
Nowhere near it.
And I don't care how anybody on the left wants to hear that or analyze it.
What it boils down to is this is a campaign on the left about Hillary Clinton, and there isn't a whole lot of unbridled excitement about it out there.
There may be some pro forma perfunctory attitudes about it as though, well, she's a nominee.
We already know that.
She's gonna be elected, we know that.
But there's no excitement about it.
Nothing comparable to what's happening on the Republican side.
Now, granted, there's not a whole lot of drama either on the on the Democrat side, but Hillary's not jazzing anybody.
And Bernie may be drawing crowds, but there they he's he's not turning people out that way.
It's a very, very important dose of reality.
You get caught up in the buzz of Bernie's campaign, and he caught up in the buzz of his big crowds, but it's like Romney was drawing huge crowds in the last week of the 2012 campaign, but they didn't show up.
Or they were dwarfed by others who did show up on election day.
Now there are two stories in the last couple of days about uh Al Sharpton and Hillary, and how he's he's not uh he's he's not he's not all in on Hillary.
He uh Reverend Sharpton, not clear that Hillary gets racial issues.
There was a political story.
This one is the uh Washington free beacon and the headline Sharpton doesn't quite trust Hillary Clinton, questions her understanding of racial issues.
PMS NBC host and controversial activist Al Sharpton doesn't quite trust Hillary Clinton, according to sources in a political story that was posted on Monday, and he would not fully endorse Clinton's understanding racial issues.
Glenn Thrush, a politico reported that people close to Sharpton say he likes Clinton and is probably inclined to endorse her, but he doesn't quite trust her.
Now just imagine how sketchy you have to be for Al Sharpton not to trust you.
For crying out loud, can you imagine what that says about Hillary Clinton?
If something like Al Sharpton doesn't trust you.
Sharpton also said that he wants to see how Hillary's campaign performs, and he's intent on exercising maximum leverage on the issues that he cares most about.
Community policing, sentencing laws, urban economic development, and forgetting tax bills.
The minute you endorse, you become a surrogate, and I want to be an advocate, said Sharpton.
The translation for that is Sharpton's not going to endorse Hillary until he figures he's wrung all the promises he can out of her.
Given all that Obama has given Sharpton, that's going to be a high bar.
I mean, Obama's given Sharpton everything.
Access, you knows what.
And that's going to be a big bar for Hillary to overcome.
Glenn Thrush asked Sharpton if Hillary gets race.
And Sharpton said, well, I think she's familiar with it.
Familiar.
Excuse me.
Familiar with it.
She was out there.
I think I had the sound yesterday, and they didn't get to it, but she's doing her black dialect.
She was doing her southern dialect.
I no way tired.
She just, wherever she goes, she tries to sound like she thinks her audience speaks.
It's transparent as uh as you can get.
Now Sharpton says, I think Hillary's familiar with race.
She worked for Marion Wright Edelman, that was at the Children's Defense Fund.
And March with Dr. King.
And I think I think that her husband and his Arkansas background living more with blacks.
They were more acculturated, but comfort and culture is two different things.
But that's strange because you go back to 2008, Sharpton threw down the race card on Bill Clinton.
Remember that?
Well, properly so Clinton was sitting around talking with Ted Kennedy.
You know, and Obama walked by, and Ted Kennedy sitting there and in Clinton said, hey, hey, you know, Ted, it wasn't that long ago.
That guy'd be feshired drinks.
Said that of Obama.
Obama heard about it, and all hell broke loose.
So anyway, my my only point here is that things things are not just rosy smooth on the Democrat side.
And there's immigration uh news out there.
A couple of stories.
Jeff Sessions says that uh the federal government, the ICE people are letting 97% of these kids, these unaccompanied minors crossing the border.
He says that 97% of them are being allowed to stay.
Only three to four percent of the unaccompanied minors who have entered the country in the last two and a half years have been returned to their home countries.
It cannot be, Sessions said.
It just cannot be that every young person that appears from Central America is entitled to asylum or entry into the United States, contrary to our laws.
This was during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.
It just cannot be.
Does anybody in this government not understand that?
Immigration officials testified that the border crisis could be mitigated if more people were sent home.
Thomas Holman's senior official, immigration customs enforcement, told the senator that I think if you uh if you have a consequence of deterrence to illegal activity, the illegal activity will slow down.
Yes, obviously, meaning if you deport people, meaning if you enforce the law, it will uh it will slow down.
Meanwhile, the flow of illegal immigrant children into the U.S. is expected to rise this year.
Record-breaking numbers.
This is an untold story.
We think it was a story of last year, where you had all these miners from Central America flooding the border.
And they were, but it's an even higher number this year, and it isn't being reported because of the presidential campaign.
And that's in addition to all the other illegal immigrants that are that are coming in, and nothing's changed about these unaccompanied minors.
I mean, everybody knows what's going on here.
These are these are kids that are being permitted to leave home by their parents.
Their parents are willingly letting their kids get on trains, whatever it takes to get here, because that they think is going to be their ticket.
They hear the Democrat Party talking about unifying families, and they don't unify families by sending the kids home.
They get the kids in here, they put them someplace, and then little uh Pablo, where's your uh where's your mom?
Find out mom and dad are in Central America.
Well, we'll get them here for you, and this is the way is all working out.
The Justice Department, the justice, this this was uh again from the stack yesterday that I that I didn't have a chance to get to.
And this is this comes under the umbrella that everything this administration is doing.
Everything is is geared toward one goal, and that's getting more and more illegals into the country, and then getting those illegals registered to vote.
It's why I spent some time yesterday.
There is a there's an you know, we we talk about uh Obama wants to transform the country.
And I was thinking that's a little vague.
What does that actually mean to people who are not here on a daily basis that might hear a snippet of conversation where that is stated?
I mean, it's Obama's own word, it's his own language once transformed.
What does it mean?
And that's why I started my riff yesterday on the attack on American culture.
That's really what's going on here.
There's an attack on the culture on Americanism.
There's an attack on the culture of this country as established from the days of our founding and moving forward.
And it is that about this country that's considered to be illegitimate and unjust and immoral.
And it was a culture that was established by a particular majority.
That's considered unjust and ill-gotten and immoral, and it's got to be busted up.
And the way Obama is busting up culture is by the unstoppable and unlimited illegal immigration of all kinds of people from different ethnicities and minority groups.
It's an all-out assault on American culture.
This election could well be said as a last stand to preserve and protect American culture.
And I'm not talking about racial culture.
I'm talking about literal culture.
The culture in which every American had a chance to grow up and prosper and live in.
To be an American meant a specific thing.
It's what was unique about it.
It's why so many people all over the world wanted to come here.
They wanted to become Americans.
They didn't just want to live in this geographic region.
They wanted to become Americans.
It meant specific things, and they were all good.
They were all related to freedom and liberty and prosperity, included among their religious liberty, economic prosperity, freedom, and so forth, all the things they had been denied, and everybody else in the world had been denied.
And it was a distinct American culture that made all these things possible and made people, gave people the opportunity to prosper within it.
That's what's being assaulted.
That's what transforming America means.
It means erasing and doing away with this culture that established this country as what it was because that culture is considered to be racist and bigoted and homophobic and all the other criticisms.
So the they're flooding the zone.
And this story yesterday, the Justice Department supports.
Get this.
This is the most, if you want to understand what this is really all about, it's about getting all of these illegals, whoever and however they get here, not just from the southern border, not just from Mexico, not Central America, but all the refugees from the Middle East, wherever they're coming and however they're getting here.
The objective of the Democrat Party is to get them registered to vote.
The Justice Department supports blocking voter registration forms that require proof of citizenship in three states.
There was a court hearing.
Well, This is the most amazing thing.
The Department of Justice urged Richard Leon, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon on Monday, to issue a preliminary injunction to prevent these states from requiring proof of citizenship for people to vote.
Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia.
And the Department of Justice, the Obama administration joined the effort, asking for a preliminary injunction to prove, in other words, the DOJ and all the groups involved here want to require Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia to do away with their requirement that you have to prove you are a citizen before you can vote.
Now, why in the world?
What?
How why in the world would you oppose this?
We are in the midst of a period of uncontrollable illegal immigration.
This is even more ridiculous than the left opposing photo ID.
You cannot vote in this country unless you are a citizen.
We have out-of-control, illegal immigration.
A number of states want to establish proof, mechanisms of proof that voters must be able to demonstrate their citizens.
And this is considered a hardship.
It's just it's considered discriminatory.
It is said to be disenfranchising.
To who?
Who in the world is it discriminating against?
Why in the world would you want to make the case?
Why would you want to make it easier for non-citizens to vote, which is what the DOJ is doing here.
And you know who's at the bottom of this suit?
The League of Women Voters, which is another ultra-left-wing group.
The League of Women Voters brought the suit against Kansas, Alabama, and Georgia, alleging that the requirement to prove citizenship acts as a barrier to voter registration, particularly for the poor, for minorities and older people who may not have the required documentation.
The Justice Department's decision to support the ban is unusual because the department would otherwise be in the position of defending this case.
it's so obvious this is about the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission The injunction was requested by the League of Women Voters, which is suing the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission.
It's a federal agency that normally the DOJ would support.
That normally the DOJ would back up.
The DOJ has joined in a lawsuit against one of its own agencies.
For the express purpose of stopping and eliminating the requirement that proof of citizenship be demonstrated before one can register to vote.
In 2013, the Supreme Court struck down an Arizona law that similarly required proof of citizenship in the voter registration process.
And in that case, Scalia wrote in the court's majority opinion that states could seek approval from the EAC for changes to voter registration forms.
A year later, a federal appeals court ruled that the EAC was not required to make such changes, and the Supreme Court declined to review that ruling last year.
Anyway, what this boils down to is any impediment to registering illegals and undocumented is going to be fought by this administration because they're the end game is not just flood the zone and not just take on American culture.
The way to do it is to have them registered to vote when they're not allowed to, when they're not entitled to, knowing full well how they're going to vote.
That is for Democrats.
Back after this, folks, don't go up.
To the phones we return.
This is Sal in Cooperstown, New York.
It's great to have you, sir.
Hello.
Hey, Russ, thanks for taking the call.
A little nervous, so I'll try to make my point regarding endorsements.
All right.
My opinion is that lately we see the public considering even the so-called true conservatives, the Haleys, the Tray Gouties in Congress or the Senate.
Be part of the club, as you call it, or the establishment.
And when I hear so many on TV talk about, you know, who exactly is the establishment, for me, it's any candidate that's going to be indebted to an industry or a company because the candidate has accepted huge donations.
And what I'd like to see from the politicians today, and they have an opportunity to make a name for themselves, good or bad, is not worry about what the consequences are going to be endorsing a candidate, because there has to be more than the select few that have done so in support of Trump, but haven't because they're fearful, fearful for their careers.
And I think that that just shows that they are also spineless if they're not coming out in support of him.
And lastly, I think if Trump really, and st I still question whether he really, really wants This.
Because if he really, really does want this position, he can have it with just a few minor tweaks on the things that he does on a daily basis.
And so that that that is my point regarding the endorsement.
All right, wait, two things.
Wait, wait, wait.
Don't go away here.
Don't go away.
Uh said some provocative things.
Did I understand you correctly?
You think a lot of Republicans would endorse Trump except they're afraid to?
I do.
I think they're afraid to endorse him because the perception from the Republican Party is that if you're for Trump, because they're doing everything they can to get rid of this man, and that if you're for him, then you will be looked at by some in the public as bigoted or racist or just too flamboyant or not presidential.
Yeah, but you started off describing this as the as as being establishment related, and you're on to something there, but that's not how the establishment operates.
Um I'll explain that later.
But here's the question then.
Yeah.
If Rubio is out there saying that Trump does not describe his policy and that you can't get away with that down the road.
Well, you know what, Mr. Rubio, we've asked you so many times what's your stance on immigration, and your reply is uh let's build a wall, which has been Trump's motto.
And then his response is we'll let the American people decide what they'll accept.
But see, that's not describing your policy.
Wait, wait, wait, but that's not that's not right either.
Can you hang on to the break here?
And then will you let me speak and respond to you when we come back?
Because if you will, I'll let you hang on here.
Okay, we're back with Sal from Cooperstown, New York.
Sal, about your definition of the establishment.
You said you consider the established to be any Republican takes money from contributors and is going to act on that money in terms of uh executing policy or what have you.
It's close, but look, in terms of endorsements, the Republican Party is the Republican Party, and for all intents and purposes, we're going to call it the establishment.
If you're in the Republican Party, if you're elected and you want to become more powerful in the Republican Party, if you want to climb the ladder of success in the Republican Party.
If you're in the House and you want a good committee chairmanship and you want to get part of the leadership eventually, Senate, same thing.
You are not going to endorse Donald Trump.
You're going to endorse who the party is officially for, and right now that has become Rubio.
It was Jeb, it has become Rubio.
If you don't do that, you may as well forget amounting to anything in the Republican Party.
It'd be no different if you worked for McDonald's and went out there publicly to endorsed Wendy's.
You'd be finished at McDonald's.
You just it's just the way it is.
It's not we that are not part of the establishment, we as the public, we finally have a chance.
Finally have a chance to hire somebody who is not indebted, who is not playing the, hey, I better go along with the right.
Right, exactly.
But the Republican establishment is not applauding that.
They're scared to death of that.
They don't want any part of that.
They don't want you hiring somebody that's not one of them.
And you can't expect them to get excited that you're going to do that.
And you can't expect you're gonna fight you left and right, which is exactly what they're doing, which is why they are in trouble.
And it look, it goes it goes much deeper than than that.
But that's who the establishment is.
The establishment is the club that you can't join.
You can't apply for it, there's no application.
You don't go, hey, I want to join this club.
You can run for office, you can become a lobbyist, but there have you can't get in there on merit.
It has to be connections, and then merit takes over.
It's a closed club.
You can't fly to Augusta, Georgia, go to the clubhouse at Augustine Ash, I want to I want to become a member.
It doesn't work that way.
In any club of elites.
And by the way, let me tell you something else, Al Sharpton said.
And this he is more right than he may know.
Donald Trump is from Queens.
He has never been accepted by the elites of Manhattan, despite what he's done.
Trump's dad, Fred Trump was from Queens.
Trump was born in Queens.
These clubs, these when you're talking about elites and these super high achievers or whatever, however, they got there, they are really exclusive and exclusionary.
And Trump has never been welcomed into that group of elites that make up Manhattan power brokers, be they in real estate or politics or anything else.
Now, that's not to say that he doesn't run around with them.
It's not to say that he doesn't go to dinner with them.
Doesn't say that he doesn't socialize, but he's not one of them.
And it has propelled him and motivated him to build taller buildings, to become more famous, to become a bigger personality than any of them combined, because he's not admitted.
Now, this is not something that bugs him.
He doesn't run around feeling uh middle block on the order.
He has no insecurities about this or inferiority complex.
It's just the way it is.
So he's is in battle with them now in politics.
He's not in that club.
He's not one of those elites.
He's from Queens.
He's not from Manhattan, he's never been accepted in the Manhattan.
It's really tiny and small.
You don't get accepted by moving there and uh becoming a success there.
I mean, unless it takes years and years and years and years.
But one of the hallmarks of elite clubs like this, no matter where you find them, and they exist in every town.
Every city, every town has its own elite structure, the people that run the show, and if you're in it, you're in it.
If you're not, uh, and if you want to be, you're gonna spend your life in disappointment.
Trump has decided that he's going to do everything he's done despite them, while not becoming accepted by them or one of them and so forth.
And the same thing is playing out here in politics.
And I think it's one of the things that does motivate him, uh, in a sense, like it would motivate uh anybody else.
So when it comes to endorsements, the Republican Party, if you're in it and you've run for office, and if you have accepted help, i.e.
money from the RNC, or the Republican senatorial campaign committee, or the House Campaign Committee.
Both the House and the Senate, Republican and Democrat have a group whose purpose is to make sure every elected Republican stays elected and new ones get elected.
And every year the leader changes.
And what they say to you is, let's say you're a freshman, you've gotten elected, you come in and they bring you in.
What do you want to do here?
And you tell them, well, I want to become this committee and this committee, and they tell you what you have to do to do it, and that is do what we say.
You vote the way we tell you on legislation.
You don't say what we don't want you to say, say what we want you to say, do it for enough times that we can trust you, and uh you might get on that committee you want to someday be chairman of.
If you violate it, if you go outside in this case, like you, if they go somebody in this situation goes out and endorses Trump, they are finished.
They may be re-elected every year, but they're finished.
They are non-persons inside the party.
It's made miserably for them.
They don't want to stay.
Luis Gutierrez, Democrat Illinois admitted all of this that it also exists on the Democrat side.
That's why you're not going to have a whole lot of these people at this stage endorsing Trump.
Now, when we get a nominee, then all of this changes, and then party loyalty rears its head.
But in this case, even you're gonna have some split factions because they're going to be some in this elite Republican group who are gonna vote for Hillary and they're gonna say so rather than vote for Trump.
They've already done so.
There have already been unnamed.
They have been quoted as anonymous elected Republicans as saying they're going to vote for Hillary instead of Trump if he's the nominee.
Can't stand this because Trump blows up their elite status.
Trump blows up their club.
Trump demonstrates you don't have to be in the club to get anywhere.
The elites and the clubs rely on one thing.
Well, many things, but one thing to ensure loyalty, and that is you can't climb the ladder without being a member.
Okay, so Trump gets the nomination.
They can't let this guy become president.
It just demonstrates that their club's not needed.
That's where the Republican Party is in this whole primary right now, folks.
Everything happening in this primary is showing that the Republican Party.
Their chosen guy, Jeb Bush, 115 million, four points.
Four or five points.
Now they're moved on to Rubio.
Question ought to be, why now Rubio?
Why not Rubio at the beginning?
If you like Jeb, what is this really about?
You signing on to Rubio because you really like Rubio's ideas, or is he the next guy up in the club?
And the answer is he's the next guy up in the club.
They hate Cruz.
Cruz is exactly what I just described.
Cruz has gone up against him.
He's done it publicly.
He's done it on the Florida Senate.
He's challenged the leadership as a bunch of lying snitches.
He's not, he doesn't have a future there and he knows it.
And they're not going to help him.
And that's why when Trump runs out and says basically defamatory things, the Republicans are not coming to Cruz's rescue.
He's getting what he deserves.
He went up against the club, he went up against the elites, and this is what he deserves.
He's getting his.
That's the way they look at it.
Now, as to your your other thing about if Trump really wants this, Sal, would you tell me what did you say?
If Trump really wanted this, he would modify things he's saying?
What do you mean by that?
What I mean by that is when he starts hearing that if he adds up the votes, he's he he just comes out and says on TV, I'm gonna get some of those votes.
But if he looked at the camera and said to those voters, hey guys, I know you have loyalty to such and such, but let me earn your vote.
Let me show you that, yeah, I'm loud, maybe it's flamboyant, etc.
But I am the hardest working individual on this stage, and I want your vote.
Ask for my vote.
Don't assume that just because my guy drops out, that I'm coming your way.
And those are the little things that he can do that doesn't compromise his principles or compromise.
Now wait a minute, but but you're saying that if he really wants this, he's got to make some modification.
Are you worried that he really doesn't want to win this?
I am there are times where I look and hear the things he says and says, come on, Donald, you know better than that that this cheap like American public, they're very easily persuaded by things that are said not only by you, but how the media portrays it.
And if he would just tweak things here and there, like why should he?
Sal, wait a minute, hear me on this.
Why should he tweak anything?
He went out there and said, I could commit murder on Fifth Avenue and my voters wouldn't leave me.
And he was right.
And the media had a cow.
The media can't believe he's still alive and breathing.
The media thought he'd be dead back on June 20th, three days after he announced.
I mean, there's not your theory that he doesn't really want to win this because he's out saying outrageous things guaranteed to cause people some concern and not vote for.
We're way past that.
But if he could just tweak a couple things to guarantee an ultimate win, isn't winning the ultimate goal here?
Yeah, and I think I I well, yes.
Yes, I was gonna offer opinion Yes, it of course it is.
But you think he might be trying to lose it.
No, I'm not thinking he's trying to lose it.
I'm just thinking that him being himself to some people in America that truly don't see through it all, might be persuaded.
Okay, let me ask you this.
Let me ask you a point.
Forget the what you said about how he can appeal to voters instead of assume he's gonna get them.
Does it bother you at all that he's out there just saying this this really really defamatory stuff about Ted Cruz, calling him a liar and a nut, crazy and waving the Bible, he doesn't really believe all this religious stuff because he wouldn't be holding the Bible while lying the way he does.
Does that bother you?
Is that kind of stuff what he says about other candidates bother you?
From the topic of why he's doing it, no, but why I am bothered by it is if he keeps these two candidates, Rubio and Cruz in the race right to the end, I'm convinced that he can win it.
So I don't want Rubio or Cruz to drop out.
I want them to stay in it and continuously get their 20%, let him get his 40, and that will get him to where he needs to get to.
If one of those two decide to drop out, then I'm gonna have to worry about something else.
Whether it happens or not is another story, but it is something to talk about.
Fascinating.
All right, good.
I've got to take a break.
That's we gotta process that.
Because we got a genuine Trumpist here, folks.
Got to process that.
We'll do it, and we'll get back to more of your calls too when we get back.
Thank you, Sal, for holding on.
Back right after this, folks.
Don't go away.
Now in this interview that uh Trump or rather Sharpton gave to the political in explaining why he's not sure that Hillary understands race.
Sharpton actually said that being from Queens has kept Trump from ever being accepted by the rich and powerful in Manhattan.
He's and it's it's true.
This is not a criticism, folks.
I'm no I'm not complaining about anything, and Trump doesn't either.
It's just the way of the world.
This why all this talk of equality and sameness and it's a it's it's bogus.
You're always gonna have the movers and shakers and the powerful that determine things.
It's just it's ne you're never gonna take that away from them.
Well, it's not that you're never going to take it away from them.
You're never gonna change them.
It's just it's it's there are elites in any homeless populations.
You you've you've got the elite bunch that determine who's real and who isn't in there.
It's it's just the way human beings organize themselves.
And uh Sharpton's point was that the elites, the power brokers, the rich and powerful in Manhattan, Trump's and Queens.
He was never fully accepted.
He was accepted as a success, he was accepted as a guy to build buildings, but he's not one of them.
Sharpton said just like being black kept him from being accepted by the same people in Manhattan.
But anyway, Sharptest point is this is why Trump is so anti-establishment, and why he's willing to take on the establishment is because there is some uh some resentment there.
And to one degree or another, there's truth to this.
And by the same token, you have people, and they're obvious if you know how to spot them.
I call them front runner suck-ups.
You can spot there people that want who are not part of these uh clubs or groups, but desperately want to be, and so badly want to be that they will publicly demonstrate that they want to be by acting like they are, by trying to be in close proximity to whoever, whoever is hot at the moment.
Whoever's got a lot of light shining on them, the that today mostly means getting a lot of media coverage.
You'll see all kinds of people that are trying to get close and maneuver in and and want to be thought of as uh a crucial uh member of someone's inner circle or what have you.
No, uh yes, I could name names that I'm not going to.
There's no point in naming names.
If you know how to spot these people, you can see them left and right.
Uh they're general, I'll tell you how to find them.
They're people that on their own have done very little.
And uh but that's not their reputation.
It happens to be the reality, but it's not their reputation.
Reputations are far beyond what they've actually done, but they know their reputation is shaky and sketchy.
This is a constant attempt to make it up here as though they're insiders.
Uh let me think of somebody who's dead who did this that I could give you an illustration.
Uh it may take a while to come up with that, but uh I know you're curious.
Who are you talking about?
What do you mean?
Give us an example.
I understand that.
And I will um I mean, they're all over the place.
Music, movies.
There's names for them, celebrity screwers.
But just as there are you've got you've got the same type of people trying to get in tight with bankers, try to get in tight with politicians, try to get in tight with media people, try to get in tight with uh anybody else who's who's getting a lot of media and public attention for whatever reason, who Have not been able to do it on their own, who want to have it reflect on them, but they're not responsible for it.
And they're all over the place, folks.
And sometimes they're very able to fool.
No, I'm not thinking well, Hillary.
No, no, no, no.
I'm not thinking of the Clintons are a different uh Clint.
The Clintons are really not part of any elite, but they were able to forge their own sort of perverted version of one because uh they were able to shine or bring a lot of light to a lot of other people.
But they're they're not a good example of this.
They're an example of people who've uh outsiders who got inside and forced people to uh accept them.
But anyway, I'm out of time again.
You sit tight here, folks, because we got a big exciting broadcast hour on the other side of this.
So hang in there.
Wait till you hear what the University of Michigan has done for its students.
▲
Export Selection