All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 25, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:41
January 25, 2016, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Right here.
I just wrapping up an email note.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome.
Great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
A brief departure today.
Normally, it's been this way for the past, I don't know.
Number of years, but particularly in the last two or three weeks, at least half of every day's audio soundbite roster has been about me.
What I've been doing is relegating those sound bites to the last hour of the program so as to avoid any cat call criticism.
But I want to make this all about me, but today I can't.
I've got to move this stuff to the top because it's it's uh it's relevant.
We'll get to it just a second.
I have a question, folks.
I really am bugged by something here.
I'm watching all of this talk about banning the Oscars.
And all these Hollywood liberals and Hollywood actors and actresses are running around saying, we can't go to the Oscars.
There aren't any black nominees.
It's a racist bunch.
It's racism, and we're not gonna go support it.
If that's the case.
Then why aren't all good liberals boycotting the Democrat presidential primaries?
Which is whiter.
A list of Oscar nominees or the Democrats running for president.
Is there a whiter group among those two?
It would seem to me that if you're gonna boycott the Oscars, which not nearly as important as the presidential race, if you're gonna boycott the Oscars because there are no black nominees, well then it seems to me you would boycott the Democrat presidential primaries because there aren't any black candidates.
is a reasonable question to make Clint Eastwood has Oh, get before I get to Eastwood, has anybody ever heard of the actress Julie Delpe?
D E L P. I never have.
I don't I don't know who she is, uh, but there's a big story on her.
She's an independent.
I guess she acts in independent movie productions rather than big studio jobs.
She said the most incredible thing.
This in the New York Daily News on Saturday, Julie Delpe says nothing is worse than being a woman in Hollywood.
Quote, I sometimes wish I were African American.
Holy smokes.
Are these people obsessed with ethnic and identity?
Well, of course they are.
Makes the perfect point.
Indy, darling, Julie Delphi says that she would rather be black than be a woman in Hollywood.
She was in something called before midnight.
You know what before midnight is?
Nobody knows what that okay, fine.
The before midnight star argued that women have it the worst amid uproar over this year's Lily White Oscar knob.
Why aren't we seeing similar stories about the Democrat presidential primary?
You talk about Lily White, not only Lily White, but I mean Jurassic Park old to boot.
You got Hillary, you have Crazy Bernie, and then you've got Abs, which is Martin O'Malley, who's he's there for what reason nobody really can figure out.
And these clowns are having a seminar tonight or a town hall or some such thing on uh on CNN because somebody's uh was it Bernie upset they've scheduled all these things on Saturday nights that nobody has seen?
Oh no, that's not why I take it back.
They're they're doing this because Bernie has launched so far ahead of Hillary that the Hillary camp got hold of Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz and said, Look, we need to do something about this.
We tried to hide all this, but Bernie's skyrocketing past us, and he is.
I mean, it's by a big number.
Um, not just in the polling data, but also in the uh in fundraising.
Clint Eastwood has come out and and and said this this boycott of Hollywood by black actors is nonsensical.
He says, not everybody can win an Oscar.
He slammed those boycotting next month's epidemic awards.
He criticized the idea of a boycott.
He said, a lot of people are crying, I guess.
You hear what?
What's her name?
Uh Charlotte Rampling.
She said, Why, why this is this is an attack on this is this is again racism against whites.
If the blacks say they're not going to show up, then that's racism again.
And everybody jumped down her throne and she's had to clarify and restate her thoughts.
I mean, they really, really what do you mean white we there's no such thing?
And then Stacey Dash over at Fox said, you know what?
This is all crazy.
Not only should we stop this stupid boycott, we need to shut down BET.
We need to shut down the BET awards and all these segregations.
Look, if we want to be integrated, we want to be integrated.
If you want to be segregated, be segregated, but you can't have both at the same time.
And of course, everybody jumped down her throat, but Stacy Dash doesn't care.
She didn't apologize or reissue any clarifications.
So let's just, I'll tell you what, let's get started here with the um uh oh and yeah, Obama, we gotta get to this too.
Obama says, I'm he's he's very, very upset at all the polarization in the uh in the country.
The interview that was broadcast yesterday morning said his inability to reduce polarization between the political parties in Washington gnaws on him as he settles into his final year in orifice.
It's on CBS Sunday morning.
And the one thing that gnaws on me is the degree of continued polarization.
And he says it's gotten worse over the last several years, and I think that in those early months, my expectation was that uh we could pull the parties together a little more effectively.
You know, uh this may be the mother of all deployments of the limbaugh theorem.
This may be, I mean, the the the not the tip of the iceberg, the piece of the cake.
This this may be the greatest example.
Here's the guy.
Not only is he responsible for the divide, he wants the divide.
He wanted the divide to happen.
He wanted the chaos, he wanted the disunity.
It's all part of transforming the country.
Now to sit around just, you know, one thing I really regret is that I wasn't able to uh pull the country together.
This from the guy who in the in the first two weeks in office brings the Republicans up for a congressional leaders meeting and says, Look, I don't care about your ideas.
I won.
And that's how it works here.
And by the way, you guys need to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh.
That's not how things get done here.
And now this guy's out running around saying the one thing that disappoints him the most is the polarization that gnaws at him daily.
He wasn't able to fix.
Who has done more to polarize this country?
And from his first day in office.
Remember him say, I won.
The Republicans are gonna have to sit in the back of the bus.
Remember him saying that.
Remember the Republicans drove the country into the ditch, and now they want the keys back?
Wouldn't be responsible thing for parents to do, he said.
Treating Republicans like children who wrecked a car.
Remember him telling his supporters, get in their faces?
Remember the Chicago way, they bring a knife, you bring a gun.
They injure one of yours, you put two of theirs in the hospital.
This is Barack Hussein, oh, and he's right there wondering why he has not been able to unify the gun.
And he's not serious.
This is again it's Limbaugh theorem.
Okay, let's uh let's let's go to the audio soundbox.
Got some really fascinating stuff here.
As as we get, we're one week away from the Iowa caucuses today.
And it's all over the park now.
You've got you've got people weighing in on how the polls don't mean anything, particularly in Iowa.
They don't mean anything for host of reasons.
You've got people beating up on Jeb Bush.
I got a story, Steve Hayes here from the Weekly Standard really laying into Mike Murphy, who runs the Bush Pack called uh Raising the Roof or whatever, right to rise, that's what it is.
And the headline, how Jeb Cleared the Way for Trump.
Now, as you will hear, I'm being blamed for Trump.
Oh, yes.
Does that surprise you?
Oh, and I am being blamed for Trump now.
But I asked Trump to run.
I've been advising Trump.
Yeah, right, of course.
No, they're not saying that.
They're not, they're they're they're not they're not.
You'll hear what they're saying.
It's coming up in the audio.
So I just want to point out here.
By the way, let don't let anybody I did not ask Trump to run.
I don't advise Trump.
You know, people could hear that, take it out of context, might appear somewhere on some watchdog website.
I did snurdly said that stuff to me and I was repeating it, echoing it.
It's a joke.
In the old days, everybody would have known something like that was a joke.
Already there are people in their pajamas getting out of bed running to their computer keyboards.
Oh my god, Limbaugh just said he's the one that told Trump to run.
Oh my god, I got a scoop.
And they're typing it up there to tweet it out.
To Facebook it out.
So I just want you to know it's all made up.
We just have a little fun here.
Stephen Hayes, a weekly standard, how Jeb cleared the way for Trump.
Yeah, the bottom line is you know why there's Donald Trump.
It's very, very simple.
It has nothing to do with me.
The Republican Party.
Whatever you want to call the Republican establishment, the ruling class.
I don't care what you want to call it, they are responsible for Donald Trump.
They are responsi I I'll go through the reasons again here in due course if you'll hang in there and be tough.
Let's go to the audio soundbites or get started on this before the first break of the hour.
Um I'm not gonna air audio soundbite number one.
We're gonna go to number two.
Number one is simply uh Howard Kurtz talking to Trump on Fox News channel on Sunday morning.
And Howard Kurtz tells Trump, yeah, when Rush Limbaugh tells you to back off, you back off, and when he doesn't, you don't.
I mean, it sounds like it's really can and Trump says, no, no, no, no, Russia's not said any of that.
Russia's been terrific, he made a point, but then he said, You gotta do what you gotta do.
Everybody's cool there, Howard, don't sweat it.
So just to get that on record, now we go to the uh same show, media buzz, Howard Kurtz speaking with the Republican strategist Mercedes Schlap about National Review magazine and their anti-Trump issue.
Howard Kurtz says, You saw Trump hitting back against National Review, but it's uh it's influential in the media, National Review is.
Now that is a key claim.
Howard Kurtz says to his guest here, National Review is influential in the media.
Is this National Review campaign against Trump as a menace to the conservative movement?
Is that a problem?
Is the National Review issue a problem for Trump?
I don't think so necessarily.
You have to understand the Trump supporter.
The Trump supporter is not a subscriber to the National Review.
They are getting their cues from Rush Limbaugh.
There is a disconnect between these conservative thinkers, many of them who live in New York and Washington, D.C. and the rest of America.
They're not getting cues from me.
They're getting cues from Trump.
Why is it you have a candidate, particularly Trump?
Why is it that when we're talking about Republicans or well, I know the answer to the question, I'm asking it rhetorically.
Why is it that we're talking about Republican candidates, even Trump?
When you start talking immediately, and he even this this woman's a Republican strategist, it can't be that people are making up their own minds.
It can't be.
No.
They're taking their cues from somewhere.
You people, the Republican voter, the Republicans, apparently on the on the strategist and consultant side, even believe this.
That you don't have minds of your own.
That what you do is the result of whoever has the most influence over you.
It might be Dr. Knouthammer, it might be National Review, it might be George Will, it might be Talk Radio.
But doesn't matter.
You are incapable of making up your own mind.
And so when when she and I'm not, I'm not.
This is not an attack on Mercedes Schlepp.
I don't even know Mercedes Schlepp.
I'm just words mean things.
I listen to what people say.
I'm a literalist, as you know me.
I'm the mayor of Realville.
She may not intend this meaning, but I'm telling you that's how I interpret it.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
uh Trump supporters are not subscribers to National Review.
They're getting their cues from Rush Limbaugh.
There's they're getting their cues from Trump.
Trump is who they're supporting.
In fact, it's really I I think it it it is a mistake for these people to assume that Trump supporters are not Trump supporters for specific reasons related to Trump.
I don't know.
I don't know what they're telling themselves.
Then she goes on to say here that there's a disconnect between these conservative thinkers, many who live in uh New York and Washington, the rest of America.
That that case can be made for that for anybody uh that lives, works in Washington, New York, Boston, the uh East Coast corridor.
Now we move to the Kelly file.
Megyn Kelly, this is on Friday night on Fox, and she is interviewing Rich Lowry.
Is there one or two bites?
Let me go to the next page.
See if this sets up.
One bite, here it is.
This is the exchange they have.
Rush Limbaugh came out and said, this is misplaced because you overestimate the degree of conservatism in the Republican Party.
He could be right.
If he is right, it's profoundly depressing.
And our mission is to hold up this banner and put this flag in the ground for principal conservatism, whether it's popular or not.
And in fact, sometimes the less people want to hear something, the more important it is for us to say it.
I wonder how many people might be confused or not understanding what I mean when I say that the Republican Party is overestimating its base.
And I didn't say overestimating the degree.
Well, yeah, overestimating the degree of conservatism, but uh overestimating is a key word.
You have to understand how the establishment defines conservatism before anybody says anything.
And they look this is true of Republicans in some cases.
It's true of Democrats from top to bottom.
It's true of liberals top to bottom.
It's true of some conserv uh Republicans, but not all.
And that is the conservative base.
Why do you think Jeb wants to win without it?
They do not have a positive attitude of the conservative base or the Tea Party.
They they think of them largely devoted to pro-life.
That's their main fear and rub is they think they're all pro-life social issues, first, second, and third people.
And then they want low taxes and smaller government and spending.
They just and they're overestimating, they're misdefining what it is that defines the conservatism of the base has has been my point.
And as such, they are ignoring it at their peril.
Anyway, I gotta take a break them up against it on time.
Sit tight, folks.
Back after this.
Don't go away.
So when I say overestimating the conservative base, what I mean not by numbers.
They're not overestimating the numbers of conservatives, they're overestimating what they think of as conservatism.
They they think of conservative, the GOP moderates, the establishment look at conservatives and see a bunch of strident single issue, inflexible people.
And that's not who the Republican base is.
That's not who conservatives are.
They are much more broad-based.
So when I say overestimating, I mean over-emphasizing probably would be uh a better word.
They don't understand them.
I don't care what word you use.
The Republican base is not understood by its own party because of a built-in prejudice and bias against it.
I'm I I'm not aware I said this about national review, by the way.
I I'm saying it long said it about the Republican establishment.
But I I think when it when it comes down to who is and who isn't a conservative, I think even the experts in the business don't know.
Because of whatever prejudice they have against certain conservative uh policies or issues, whatever uh Bias they've got, they don't take the time to understand really how broad the spectrum is of conservatism.
It's much more than just the social issues, it's much more than just pro-life versus pro-choice.
It's much more than small government and low taxes.
And they use those characterizations to impugn belittle mock, and it goes far, far deeper.
So maybe overestimate is a confusing word, but I'm not suggesting that they're overestimating the number.
They're overestimating their definition, which is narrow and singular.
And it's why they tend to join Democrats in thinking when it comes to who conservatives are.
Anyway, back to the audio sound bites when we get back.
Hey, Dean.
Dean, I need you to go back to the archives and post something right now at uh at Rushlinbod.com.
By the way, oh, Coco's on sick day today.
Coco's got a bad, bad, bad cough and whatever else, so uh Coco Jr.
Dean is running it.
This is a story from the, let's see, February 7th of 2014.
And I wonder how many people will remember this.
February 7, 2014, two years ago, coming up on two years ago, the headline, New York Times, the end of snow.
Question mark.
Over the next two weeks, hundreds of millions of people will watch Americans like Ted Ligetty and Michaela Schiffrinski for gold in the downhill alpine course.
TV crews will blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
And they go on to talk about all the Olympic events that had to be canceled because lack of snow, lack of snow is a big problem, lack of snow all over the world is because of climate change and global warming.
And could we be at the beginning of the end of no snow?
The end of snow.
They say the same thing could happen in the U.S., where in the Northeast, more than half of the 103 ski resorts may no longer be viable in 30 years because of warmer winters.
End of Snow, New York Times, February 7th, 2014.
Okay.
Now, here's my recycled explanation again for the theory that the GOP paved the way for Donald Trump.
And so did Obama, by the way.
I mean, Obama's actually the starting point.
It's Obama's radicalism that actually begins the process, which creates a scenario where somebody like Donald Trump charges in to fill an absolutely impossibly huge vacuum.
Now we knew who Obama was.
Well, I did from even before he was inaugurated.
I don't know how many Republicans looked or today even look at Obama as a radical anything.
Many of them just see him as the latest Democrat.
But he's far more than that.
He is the most radical leftist that has been elected president that's even gotten close to it.
And because Obama was not stopped, because the Republican Party laid down.
I'm telling folks, Donald Trump would not have exploded.
Donald Trump would not have thought to even do any of this.
Nor would any other outsider.
I'm telling you, if the Republican Party had just simply seriously tried to stop Obama, if they had just done what opposition parties are assumed to do.
2010, 2014, the Republican Party was given huge landslide victories, admittedly in midterm elections, but in both of them.
One of them gave them the House of Representatives and a record number of Republicans in the House.
The Democrats haven't had this few members of the House representatives since the Civil War.
The 2014 midterms gave the Republicans the Senate.
So, yeah, they were midterms, but they were huge, huge Democrat landslide defeats all the way down the ballot.
On every issue that matters, on every issue that drove the turnout in 2010 and 2014, on every issue that not only drove the turnout, but resulted in massive Republican victories, the Republican Party took a dive.
They did not make one serious effort at stopping Donald Trump or stopping Obama.
Now they want to stop Trump, but they made not one effort to stop Obama.
Now, admittedly, they couldn't have stopped Obamacare because they did not have the votes.
But there wasn't, even though they didn't have the votes, they could have used the bully pulpit that they've got far more effectively than they did.
They could have gone out and spent all the time they had educating people what it was, what Obamacare was.
They could have done what we were doing here.
They could have called Obama out on his lies, that it wasn't going to allow you to keep your doctor or your plan, that it wasn't going to reduce your premium $2,500, that it wasn't going to do anything it was promising to do.
It was not going to ensure the uninsured and reduce costs and make everybody available for health care, actual treatment.
None of that was good.
They could have gone out, they could have made the case.
They could have set everybody up so that when they did get enough votes to stop it, they could have seriously made an effort to repeal it.
Well, they talked repeal.
They talked repeal during campaigns, but there was never one serious effort to repeal it.
I don't need to remind you about amnesty and immigration and all of that.
My point is that on every issue that matters, the Republican Party, which was asking for money and getting it, the Republican Party, which was asking for votes and got them, took a dive.
Now they get energized.
Now they get in gear.
Now they get revved up.
Now for what?
To stop Ted Cruz.
one of their own.
You have to understand that in this environment, that is a huge vacuum.
People of this country voting for Republicans, even people that don't vote Republican expect the Republican Party to try to stop what the opposing party's trying to do.
That's the name of the game in politics.
You supposedly bring to the table your core beliefs, your principles.
When the other side wins, you stand up for yours.
You do everything you can to convince people that the side that won is not good.
They're going to do great harm.
You set yourself up to win later elections down the road, but more than that, you do everything you can to stop what you disagree with.
They didn't.
And they still aren't.
Nobody at Fox News does.
Nobody's taking cues on Donald Trump from anybody but Donald Trump.
He's perfectly capable of providing and giving the cues.
He's giving he's done plenty to give people reasons to support him and to believe him.
I mean, if the Republican Party had actually been opposed to Obama and acted like it, the vacuum would not have existed, making it much more difficult for Trump.
When somebody comes in, enters a race, and is the only person from the outset that is voicing opposition to the status quo and is identifying with people and their feelings about it and their thoughts about it and is telling them he wants it to stop.
Why wouldn't people support that one voice?
Then the primaries get going, and Ted Cruz joins that chorus.
If you get two people, then maybe Rubio, but the other establishment Republicans.
They've had their moments, but it's not something that the Republican Party has identified with, opposing Obama, not by Republican voters.
And by the way, the budget is the most recent example of this, but it's not just the budget.
Look at all these.
I mean, you can go back even the years of George W. Bush, folks, where there was no criticism of Democrats.
The Democrats were out impugning, destroying George W. Bush and his administration, by extension, his voters, supporters.
No defense of it, no pushback.
And in fact, tell me if you remember this.
You remember people like Senator McCain, Governor Christie at times, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner.
I mean, pick your name.
How many times do you remember them saying something like we can't oppose Obama that will anger the independents?
We can't do that because that'll lead to a government shutdown for which we will be blamed.
It doesn't matter what the issue is.
Immigration budget Obamacare.
The word had gone out.
We can't oppose Obama.
The independents won't like it.
They'll get mad at criticism of the first black president, and they will run right back to the Democrats.
So there wasn't any.
And everybody else was told to shut up.
Do not be critical.
Do not oppose.
We...
They would tell you that we can't win elections by criticizing Obama.
We can't win elections by criticizing Democrats.
That's not what voters want.
Voters want bipartisanship.
Voters want cooperation.
All of that literal BS.
And so there wasn't any.
They didn't even fight back on that stuff.
The IRS was doing to the Tea Party.
Secretly, they might have actually enjoyed it, because the Tea Party was competing for donor dollars.
They didn't like the Tea Party.
Look at the built-in majority coalitions, the Republican Party, punted.
They could have had a majority coalition opposing Obamacare.
I'm even when they didn't have the votes to stop it.
Obamacare has never been supported by a majority of people.
Majority of the American people have always opposed it.
Republicans could have forged an alliance.
They could have branched out, they could have expanded their demographic appeal.
They could have done everything they claim that the party has to do to modernize and stay viable.
But they didn't do it because it would have meant criticizing Obama, and for some reason from somebody they were told can't do that.
We'll never win elections that way.
We will lose the election if we criticize Obama.
We will lose the election if we don't appear to be bipartisan and able to make Washington work.
So the IRS and Obama were allowed to basically defund the Tea Party by delaying or denying the awarding of tax exempt status to various Tea Party groups.
I mean, the list of issues is endless.
They said, don't be combative, don't be angry, can't win.
We've had to demonstrate we can cross the aisle.
We've had to demonstrate we can cooperate.
We've had to demonstrate we can be bipartisan.
And I'm telling you, this is not why people showed up in record numbers in 2010 and 2014 to vote against Democrats.
So don't believe that Donald Trump is the product of mind poisoning from talk radio.
Donald Trump is the result of the radicalism of Barack Hussein Oh, combined with the Republican Party not standing up and opposing any of it.
Not seriously.
There were words during campaigns, but when it comes to actual policies being implemented or tried, they never made Obama veto anything.
Ah, he'll just shut down the government.
You know the drill.
There was no serious effort to stop it, which is what voters wanted.
There's a huge Vacuum in that sense.
So here comes Trump.
That's why he got into it.
And it and his entry into the campaign shook it up.
The best laid plans of the established were turned upside down.
Quick timeout.
We'll continue after this.
Much more here, the EIB networks.
Okay, a couple more sound bites in and we'll get to your phone calls.
This is uh Fox News Channel Friday Night Special Report.
Brett Baer, he is uh in the round table here, and here's how he opens one of the topics on the round table discussion.
Today, Rush Limbaugh was talking about this battle between one and two, Donald Trump and Ted Cruz, and here's what he had to say.
Look, folks, you and I know the Republican establishment no more wants Donald Trump than they want Cruz.
They don't want either of them.
But they hate Cruz.
They despise Cruz because they're afraid of Ted Cruz.
Trump, on the other hand, they don't even think is a Republican.
And you get right down to brass tax of people inside the Republican Party.
Don't even think he's a Republican.
So they move on next to Dr. Krouthammer.
Ted Cruz, after playing the cliver Bayer after the after playing the clip says, uh, okay, Charles, uh, what say you?
There's a reason why this is now coming out in National Review, pushing back.
I think they have a sense that we may be approaching a moment, an inflection point, where essentially the so-called establishment, I hate the term, the mainstream Republicans decide to throw in the towel on the Trump candidacy, have a sense that he's inevitable.
Some of them because they really can't stand uh cruise, and that you may get the beginning of of establishment mainstream governors or senators.
You get one or two start to endorse Trump as essentially as a signal that it's okay.
He's become normalized.
So there's uh a bit of agreement.
Uh Dr. Kevin Hammer with me, and Republican establishment's enmity for Ted Cruz, and his point of a national review is that they are worried that uh Trump is about to become normalized and they're throwing in a towel.
Don't want to throw in the towel on it.
Assume he's going to be the nominee, they want to you know plant the flag for for conservatism here.
Um the the it's it's uh I don't think this stuff is really hard to understand.
People overanalyze this, overestimate a lot of this.
Uh and sometimes the simplest explanation for things happens to be what's right.
But I want to grab the phone call quick here before we uh escape on this hour.
Scott in uh Chevley, Maryland.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hey, thanks, Russ, uh big fan.
Uh quick comment on uh the National Review uh issue against uh Trump.
And um, you know, of course, they purport to represent uh William F. Buckley and his philosophy and so forth, but I think it's useful to be reminded of the fact that Buckley once said that he would rather be governed by the first hundred names in the Boston phone book as opposed to the faculty at Harvard.
And I think what we're seeing is the Republican base is basically saying, look, we're thinking tired of these feckless, you know, establishment Republicans who are ostensibly conservative.
We've given them the House, the Senate, they've done nothing.
So the base is saying, you know, let's let's try basically a common man, and Trump essentially represents the first hundred names in the Boston phone book.
So, you know, let's see what this guy can do.
You know, he's got the the guts to confront these, you know, uh the politically correct liberal fool.
Let me ask you a question point blank, Scott.
Do you believe what National Reviews said and others are saying that Trump is not conservative?
A number one is the follow-up question to that.
Yes or no.
Uh, you know, I do uh I I have some concerns about whether or not he is, you know, conservative.
I mean, I'm I'm vacillating between him and Cruz, you know.
Uh so yeah, I do have some concerns.
So, but you know, uh as I said, I think that people are uh But what you're saying is it doesn't matter.
It's not the deter, it's not the primary determining factor whether or not you're gonna support the guy, right?
That's right.
I mean, uh yeah.
Correct.
I'm willing to take a look and that on this.
That is that is that's Prof. And it Just in its in its own simplicity.
And there is, it's right there in front of all these people to learn.
Yeah, I gotta go.
I wish I had more time to expand on it, but I'm sure you can figure out what I'm talking about.
You see this passengers from Mexico getting off the plane at New York's JFK were allowed to not go through customs.
Just get off the plane, avoid customs, right through the terminal, and into the city.
▲
Export Selection