All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2016 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:19
January 19, 2016, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host of this program documented to be almost always right eight percent of the time.
It's great to have you folks.
The phone number, if you want to be with us on the program 800 282, 2882 and the email address L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
So let's just get to some of these uh audio sound bites.
Let me preface uh the rotation here today with just some headlines in the news out there.
What?
Oh, you think this soundbite is an is a lesson in how not to answer a question?
He answered the question.
The question was, unidentified reported to Trump, both Rush Limbaugh and Senator Cruz warned voters you may not be a real conservative.
What do you say to that?
He said, Well, I am a real conservative.
Uh this kind of is illustrative of some things because I was in some of these soundbites as you will hear.
I mean, I said things that they quote me as saying, but not when they quote me as having said them.
Is the old out-of-context trick.
But I don't think they even know.
I think they just go to Media Matters and they read a summary of what happened on this program.
That's how these reporters find out what happened here.
It's the most amazing thing.
I have my own website with word-for-word transcripts.
I have my own website where you can, and this is on the free side, you can listen to my monologues and my phone calls.
It's all recorded for posterity and history.
It's all there.
Rush Limbaugh.com has duplicated by 20 or 5 or 30 times the encyclopedia Britannica in terms of the voluminous amount of data and information, and of course, informed opinion that is out there.
All of the words have been spoken, but they're transcribed as though they're written.
So we present it as the written word at rushlimbod.com, and anybody can go there and find out what I said.
And they don't.
They go to a media watchdog site.
And they knowingly purloined things taken out of context, maybe things not even said at all.
I mean, I've had quotes made up that I stated never did, quotes attributed to me that were never said by anybody.
It's always amazed me.
I mean, we go to considerable expense to put this website together and then keep it updated during the course of each busy broadcast day.
And the clowns that report on this program don't go there, or very few of them do.
But it's it's all there.
And you will hear what I'm talking about when they get into the soundbite roster here.
First story, Trump ups the ante, everybody hates Cruz.
This is the Washington Times.
And it Trump is is behaving here true to form when he is criticized for something saying something he shouldn't have said, uh, saying something that's incorrect, he doubles down on it.
He always has.
He never backs off.
He never revises his opinion or his remarks.
He just doubles down on them.
And yesterday, I and a few others said, Mr. Trump, I mean, we know you're gonna criticize Cruz and all these other people.
It's a primary campaign.
I I can't tell you how plainly and multiple times I made the point yesterday.
It's it's silly to expect that Trump and Cruz aren't gonna be critical of each other.
There's no bromance going on here.
There's no united front where these two are not going to criticize each other.
That's n that's that's not how this works, because only one of them's gonna win.
They both want to win.
Criticism, attacks, all of this is tactical and strategic.
You plan it, you come out with the way or what with the ways you think it'll be most effective.
You target what you want to go after.
It's like I say, I think Cruz first started out by saying that Trump's not a genuine conservative, not a real conservative, but I think he's gonna give that up.
My guess, I'm while guessing, I haven't talked to any anybody about it.
I just think he's gonna go after, he's gonna end up going after Trump's populism.
That's Trump's hook.
That is Trump's appeal.
This is what confounds the GOP.
You know, they're sitting there thinking that the conservatives in the Republican Party have all abandoned the party and have gone on over to Trump.
That's not it.
How many times do we have to say this?
The Trump coalition's made up of a whole lot of people, not just conservatives.
20% of it may be Democrat.
And in fact, an increasing number just beyond that 20% may be Reagan blue-collar Democrat.
Then you've got some Hispanics, unbelievably, to people.
Women, the demographics are all covered.
The Republican base, the Republican Party is sitting there thinking that Trump's support base is all conservative, and it isn't.
And so that's why going after Trump is a legitimate conservative, that's not, I don't think it's going to work because it's not his appeal.
Trump's not out there campaigning as a conservative.
He's campaigning out there's a populist.
He's campaigning out there as a guy who's fed up with whoever it is that's doing bad and making mistakes and ruining the country.
Whoever they happen to be and wherever they are.
And his support base is made up of people who think damn right that's exactly what's happening.
It's why I said yesterday.
You can have a lot of people who are not conservative, supporting Trump's position on immigration and so forth.
It's not uniquely a conservative position.
Opposition to amnesty.
So I think Cruz recognizes this.
Which is even if he doesn't, even if he continues the attack on Trump is not a real conservative.
That's what they decide to do.
But the point is these are going to happen.
There are going to be serious efforts to take the other guy out.
It's politics.
This is what happens.
And the expectation these guys are joined at the hip here and united in purpose is a big mistake to make.
That's not how this works.
There was an indication that that was the way they were behaving up until Iowa to Cruz.
That just that that changed everything about how both decided to conduct their campaigns.
Trump is focusing on the fact that everybody hates Cruz.
So people came out and said, don't, that you're you're gonna you're gonna lose some of the conservatives in your base if you go after Cruz that way because they love Cruz.
What does Trump do?
He doubles down on how much nastier Cruz has become and how many, many more hate Cruz.
He's not backing off from it at all.
Which ought to illustrate something else.
And that's for all of you people out there waiting for somebody, either in the media or in talk radio or somewhere to take Trump out or to take Cruz out or whatever.
You've got to get off this idea that that people out there, voters are unable to think for themselves.
Most people are not sitting around waiting for marching orders.
Some, yeah, but most people, at least in this audience, they're intelligent, they are informed, they know what they think before they turn the radio on.
They're not turning the radio on here to find out what they think.
They have their opinion of Trump, they have their opinion of Cruz.
If they get mad at me, it's maybe I don't agree with them.
It's not that I am somehow not being true to myself or whatever.
It's the evidence that's personal.
I've always respected the uh audience, the you you in this audience is intelligent and informed.
Certainly don't hold you in contempt.
Certainly don't look down on you like the Democrat Party does, or like most of the Washington establishment.
So, you know, I'm I'm not under the illusion here that any candidate wins or loses based on me telling you he should win or lose.
Now, admittedly, there are some people influenced, but I'm not gonna deny that, but it's by no means a majority.
And the proof here is Trump.
Okay, so Trump gets warned by powerful voices in the media.
What does he do?
He doubles down on it.
He doesn't back off.
Although the media thinks he has.
I've read a couple of stories.
Trump's uh stopped mentioning Cruz's name here ever since Wimpaugh piped up.
Well, I don't know.
Washington Times Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump stepping up his attacks on Ted Cruz, declaring yesterday, everybody hates Ted.
He's unpopular in Washington, Trump said on Fox.
When you have somebody can't get along with anybody in Washington, you're not going to get deals done.
I mean, you have to get deals done.
We can't always keep invoking executive orders like Obama does.
He does because he can't get deals.
No, that's not why he does it.
That's not why Obama does executive orders.
Well, he would love for the Congress to go along, but that's not why he does it.
He does it because he's an Alinskyite, he's an authoritarian who has been on a mission to transform this country for seven years.
He's got one year left.
He's not doing this because he can't make deals with anybody.
He's not doing it because people won't cooperate.
He's doing it because this is what he wants to see happen in and to the country.
And to hell if people don't agree with him.
Even more so, he's going to do it on his own to find a way.
I was reading my tech blogs last night.
I always do this as an escape.
It's my hobby.
And I ran across the story that Trump's gonna make Apple stop making iPhones and iPads in China.
Yeah, we're gonna make Apple make their damn computers in America.
And it was fascinating reading these little tech bloggers react to that.
Because most of them hate Trump because they think they should.
Most of them chime in.
I mean, you talk about a monolithic group people.
They're all journalists for one thing.
They all think Trump's a buffoon.
All think he's insane.
They only think he's lunatic.
They can't tell you why, they just they just think that he is.
So when when Trump comes along and says he would make Apple manufacture products in the U.S., it totally escapes these guys that presidents don't have that kind of power.
It totally escapes them that that's impossible.
Trump cannot tell a company.
He can't tell Oreos or Namisco where to make Oreos.
He can't tell Ford where to make cars.
He can't tell Apple where to make computers or phones.
Now, he can come up with tax proposals, tariffs, any kind of uh incentive he might want.
But he can't order it like a king of America could.
These guys actually started debating whether or not it'd be a good thing.
Maybe you should change their minds about supporting Trump, because wouldn't it be great if Apple were indeed making phones in America?
It just totally escapes.
This is the danger.
I mean, with Obama doing what he's doing, all these young acolytes of Obama think authoritarianism is great.
Well, yeah.
If Obama was ordering Apple to make phones in America, then they'd probably support that too.
But they don't get that these things are not.
And Trump knows it too.
If you read further in his comments, he lets it know, lets it be known that he knows.
He's just it's the way he communicates.
It's the way he sends the signal of what he thinks that he's decisive and that he's not gonna take any guff.
Um Washington Post, why so many evangelicals have faith in Donald Trump.
Meanwhile, everybody in the media is trying to make fun of Trump because the way he they think he botched the biblical scripture yesterday at Liberty University.
So all of that's coming up in the sound bites, and we got to mix your phone calls in it as well.
So we'll take a break and get started with all of that when we get back.
Don't go away.
Well, well, well, well, look at this.
What is this from?
This is uh roll call.
Roll call magazine, roll call.com.
Try this headline.
Kasich reaches 20% in New Hampshire.
An American research group poll Released today shows that Ohio Governor John Kasich is in second place in the New Hampshire primary, coming in at 20% behind Trump's 27%.
Poll can duct January 15 through 18, that's yesterday.
600 likely Republican primary voters, including 269 independents.
It's a telephone poll.
Previous ARG poll of New Hampshire, January 7 through 10, showed Kasich tied with Rubio at 14 behind Trump at 25.
Well.
What we think we know is just FOS.
What if everything we know is not right?
What if this polling data is all wrong?
Hang on, folks, gonna be uh interesting ride.
Well, you start Indianapolis with uh Brad.
Hello, sir.
Glad to have you with us on the program today.
Megadetto dress.
I I have a question that has puzzled me throughout the primary, and I was hoping you can enlighten me on it as you do daily.
Why are we as conservatives not in the leadership position of a party?
Why are we not previous?
Why are we not the establishment?
It it puzzles me that we don't seem to have the voice we should.
Uh you mean because you think that we are the majority of the party, why are we not the establishment?
Yes.
Well, I mean, that's that's perfect.
I mean, it's it's not about majority minority, it's about power brokers.
The establishment is a it's a it's a club.
There is specific requirement for membership.
And it does not include conservatism.
The establishment happen to be the people that run the party, even if they are the minority, they happen to win their elections and they are elected as leaders of the party, the RNC.
Uh the the same same way.
I know what you're getting at if if there's so many conservatives of the majority, if the base is conservative and the established made up of a bunch of minority Republicans, then how come they run the show?
Hey, uh how come the media is so powerful if most people don't like what they do?
The establishment ruling class elites, they define all of these things, and they have exclusionary practices, people they admit and don't admit into their into their club.
And it's just it's not a matter of numbers.
It's power and money and connections and any number of things.
And it's true not just in politics, it's true in any number of other institutions where a small little click actually runs the whole shebang.
There's a whole bunch of psychological reasons why uh people get away with this.
Um, but in politics, it's all about money.
And who has it and who's willing to spend it on whom to maintain positions?
And the perfect explanation for this, if you've probably reading or if you listen to the news, you hear about something called a donor class all of a sudden.
I mean, it's a relatively new term.
I mean, I've been doing this 27 years.
I never heard of the donor class till this year.
Now they may have been talking about themselves that way.
But we've had the political class, the elected class, we've had this class, that class, but donor class, and they are the money people, and they run the establishment.
They are the people that pay and fund the campaigns of the people who get elected and stay in office.
And so it's and that's been that's been the I mean the the rule of thumb for politics since before any of us were alive.
Tom Spring, Texas, your next.
Hello, sir, great to have you.
Good day to you, sir, and I hope you're doing well.
I'm well, I'm getting through, doing pretty well.
How about you?
I'm doing fine, sir.
Thank you for asking.
Um The establishment Republicans are going to such great lengths to try to impugn Donald Trump and Ted Cruz on election day.
If one of those guys gets a nomination, are there going to be enough people that stay home and hand this election to the Democrats?
Uh, well, yeah.
I mean, the the the there are members of the Republican establishment who have said they're going to vote Hillary if either one of these two guys gets a nomination.
There are any number that it's not a matter of staying home, they're going to vote Democrat.
Republicans are quoted, some of them by name, some of them not, most of them not, but they're they're telling members of the media and whoever listen this would be unacceptable.
And if either these guys are the nominee and uh and end up being the presidential candidate for the Republican Party can't good faith support it, would have to vote for Hillary because Hillary would keep Washington functioning, Hillary would keep the gravy train going.
Hillary would keep the status quo of the establishment in power and running the show.
Cruz is gonna come in and blow it up.
Trump would come in and blow it up in his own way.
Cruz would blow it up, you know, ideologically and do what he could for small government, reduced intrusive government, so Trump would come in and do it a different way, but either way, they think they'd be out.
They don't want to be out if it takes voting for Hillary to keep the establishment running the show, then that's what they've said they'll do.
Ted Cruz for his part, punching back at Donald Trump, throwing punches, Cruz telling reporters yesterday in New Hampshire that Trump is different than Reagan, but added he won't engage in attacks on the campaign trail.
Donald did an interview where he described that he thinks he's bigger than Ronald Reagan.
And then Cruz said, I would note that Ronald Reagan spent decades as a principal conservative, spent decades traveling the country sharing his views and defending the Constitution.
Reagan didn't spend the first 60 years of his life supporting Democrat politicians, advocating for big government politics, supporting things like the big bank bailouts, supporting things like expanding Obamacare to turn it into socialized medicine.
That's not what Reagan did, Cruz said.
Reagan was a voice of consistency, and I'm pretty sure that Reagan didn't write checks and support Democrat politicians like Cuomo and Anthony Wiener and Hillary Clinton.
I'm pretty sure Reagan didn't write a big check to Rahm Emanuel in December of 2010 after the big Tea Party wave.
Which is all true.
But what the point that Cruz goes on to make is he says he thinks that Trump is rattled for the first time.
He thinks that Trump is very, very dismayed.
This is the message that Cruz is putting out that Trump has had an insurmountable lead for 95% of this campaign.
That the presumed frontrunner, Jeb Bush, have been able to get higher than 6%.
Trump's always been, depending on the poll, 28 to 35, 38, maybe 40 in one poll, until Ted Cruz came along and started getting serious as we creeping up on the Iowa caucuses, and then all of a sudden Cruz's point is Trump does not know how to deal with this adversity.
He's dismayed, he is rattled, and it's forcing him to say some dumb and crazy stupid things.
This is the attack mode of Ted Cruz.
Then he starts, I mean, he mowed him down or tried to on immigration.
Cruz going after the issue that put Trump on the map.
He says, I like Donald Trump.
I respect him personally, and in this campaign he's talked a lot about illegal immigration and amnesty.
Cruz goes on to describe how he was fighting this fight.
In the recent past, the last two, three, four years, whenever the votes came up, it was Ted Cruz and some allies that were at war every day, succeeding in stopping the Obama and Republican Democrat coalition in implementing amnesty, goes on to talk about how many years, how hard everybody fought, how he was leading the fight, and then he wraps it by saying, and during all this time, Donald Trump was nowhere to be found.
So his contrast is himself a guy who's put everything on the line, who has been in the ring, gloves on and off, trying to stop amnesty.
Trump comes along, announces his campaign, says that he's going to build a wall, immigration is it.
And Cruz's point is, yeah, okay, fine.
I welcome him to the fight, but the fight's three or four years old here in the modern era, and he wasn't there during any of that.
So that's the way Cruz is going after that.
You can see here it's getting uh some might call it brutal.
I I just I just think it's politics.
You've people have forgotten.
And it's understandable.
South Carolina in 2000, McCain is still fuming over some of the things, some of the innuendo that he thinks the Bush can't put out there about illegitimate kids and and affairs and he's he's still fuming about it.
I mean, this is it it's it's the way it happens.
And and to expect I don't know if it's part of uh the way education has been going the last 10, 15 years, and those kids got out of school, they've become young adults now, and they believe conflict resolution 101 or whatever, and they just this is this is not don't criticize people like this.
Is it made me nervous?
I don't like the shouting, oh no, no and and for those of you who reacting this, this is nothing.
This campaign hasn't even gotten up to medium heat yet.
Compared to where this is headed.
You just have to sit back and listen.
Let's start the audio sound bites.
We first have here a well, may as well.
Let's start with number one.
This is a media, a montage of media trying to say that all of a sudden they have become biblical scholars, and Trump doesn't know what he's talking about when he starts reading scripture at Liberty University yesterday.
Wrongly referring to it as two Corinthians instead of second Corinthians.
The standard Christian citation is 2nd Corinthians, not two Corinthians.
No Christian says two Corinthians.
They say 2 Corinthians.
Plenty of people know the Bible, chapter and verse, have been weighing in.
Going on about 2 Corinthians, which didn't represent the Bible correctly.
Two Corinthians, 2nd Corinthians flaw.
Two Corinthians, uh, supposed to be second Corinthians.
Two Corinthians.
I'm just Corinthians and two Corinthians walking down the street.
That's a it's just a joke, folks.
These guys don't know what they're talking about.
Here all of a sudden the drive-by media, which hates anything to do with Christianity, wants to try to pass themselves off as scripture experts.
So they've read somewhere where one person said, hey, Christians don't talk about two Corinthians, it's second Corinthians.
No, it's actually the second letter to the Corinthians.
If you want to really get down and into it, it's the second letter to the Corinthians, Corinthians, second, second Corinthians, two Corinthians.
But it's a laughable thing here, but the drive-by is acting like they somehow are scholars with Ricardo Montalbon, it was the rich Corinthian leather.
Did you know that that didn't exist?
He was doing car advertisements during uh fantasy.
Yeah, for the for the the Chrysler Cordoba.
And uh this was during the days of Fantasy Island when he and Irvée Villiches ran a little fantasy on it.
Ricardo Montelbon, but the Cordoba doing commercials with rich Corinthian leather, and finally somebody said, Where do you get that?
And they made it up.
There is no such thing as rich Corinthian leather.
So they could have said second Corinthians letter that was put in the Dodge Cordoba, the Chrysler Cordoba or whatever it was.
It's just funny to me to listen to drive by's here, who wouldn't probably know a Bible if somebody put it in front of them, acting like now they know the distinction between 2 Corinthians and uh two Corinthians.
Here's um here's David Brody, this is uh CBN Network, Christian Broadcast Network, he's the chief political correspondent there, and he's interviewing uh Trump.
And he said during discussion of Trump's purported slip up yesterday.
Two Corinthians instead of second Corinthians, uh, and they have this little exchange about it.
Already on Twitter, they're, you know, and even some of the campaigns are saying two Corinthians.
You want to clear any of that up?
Well, I've actually over the years heard it both ways, but I would say probably I prefer saying second Corinthians.
Okay.
Uh, but I've heard it as you have both ways.
This is so.
Folks, did you see this yesterday?
You know, I just have to laugh.
I a lot of people get mad at me for not getting righteously indignant and offended when Trump does what he does.
But this is this is why I asked you yesterday, is it not bother you devout believers that he talks the Bible slams it?
That doesn't bother you.
He's getting ready to read two Corinthians, as he said, and he's he's got an audience here at Liberty University.
Okay, this is it.
This is it, this is what you all really believe, right?
I mean, this is an in a nutshell, this is it for you, right?
I mean, he's he's got an audience of Christians there, so it it's time to relate to him.
See, this is it for you, right?
I mean, this is all it's all wrapped up right here.
I mean, this is it.
Bible slams it or to the deal a close second, but this is it, right?
And he reads it, and halfway through it he stops.
Says, Am I right?
Am I right?
This nails it, right?
This is all it right.
Yay.
So he he treated biblical scripture as though it was just a you know quote from a Thomas Sowell column or something else.
I marvel at it.
Remember, I come at this from a little bit different angle, everybody else.
Everybody thinks that the only way to judge this is from the rigid dictates of political ideology.
I study this as performance art as uh as well.
And it is great performance art.
Here's what uh here's what Trump continued saying.
Um, because the guy this the Brody, David Brody says, You you've said in your book, and you said just a few days ago that I have a great relationship with God.
How do you see that relationship, Mr. Trump?
Very secure in my relationship with God.
That's been a very strong relationship.
I started in Sunday school many years ago with the Bible that you've seen with my mother's handwriting on it, with my address, and you know, never wanted me to lose my Bible.
And I've just always had a very good, very special relationship, and I feel a lot of what I've accomplished, if not all of what I've accomplished, is because of that relationship.
And uh feel very strongly about it, and feel very strong about evangelicals.
I feel very strong about my religion.
Okay.
I'm not that's it's it's out there.
There, there it is.
What are you laughing at, Snerdley?
But he's not look, here's Obama.
Let's let's go back, December 9th, 2014.
This is in Nashville.
Obama held a town hall event on immigration, and during the event he tried to quote the Bible.
Good book says uh, you know, don't uh don't throw stones in glass houses.
Or make sure we're looking at the log in our eye before we're pointing out the moat in other folks' eyes.
Now, nobody in the drive-by said, what the hell is he talking about?
Nobody said who and what what what verse is he citing here?
Well, he came off as totally illiterate here on a verse in the Bible.
Good book says, uh, you know, you don't throw stones in glass glass houses.
No, it's people in glass houses don't throw stones.
I mean, this is this is I don't know, folks.
This is just too much.
We'll be back.
Okay, here's one of these sound bites where I, and my inclusion in it is deceptive.
The uh editing here is deceptive.
It's ABC's Good Morning America.
The correspondent is Tom Yannis, and his I got a report here about Trump's two Corinthians slip yesterday instead of 2 Corinthians or second letter to the Corinthians, if you want to really drill down deep.
And I end up in this.
And here's how it sounded.
On Monday, Donald Trump quoting Scripture at Jerry Falwell's Evangelical Liberty University.
Humbling the Bible verse typically known as Second Corinthians.
But two Corinthians, right?
Two Corinthians 317.
That's the whole ball game.
And now Rush Limbaugh issuing this warning to voters.
There are a lot of conservatives who think that he's a wolf in sheep's clothing, that he's a traditional lifetime New Yorker, and that means something.
Okay, so yeah, I said that, but not during this episode.
I said that during a discussion of Cruz's strategy in going after Trump.
And when I said there are a lot of conservatives who think that Trump is a wolf in sheep's clothing, that he's a traditional lifetime New Yorker and it means something.
I was did that in a context of what Ted Cruz is trying to do.
It was not part of the two Corinthians thing, but they're trying to make it look like I am adding fuel to the fire by saying Trump's a fraud because he also didn't know two Corinthians.
Not only that, he's not a traditional conservative lifetime New Yorker.
This is how these guys do this.
Now, I don't I don't think Tom Yamas has the slightest idea.
Producer put this thing together and put the script in front of him, put him into a studio and said read it, and Tom Yamas, on Monday, Donald Trump quoted Scripture and Jerry Foolwell's evangelical liberty universal and does the bit, comes out of the booth, they put it on a TV show, and that's it.
Well, here you think I'll make it listen to it again.
Listen to this guy.
Play soundbite number five.
On Monday, Donald Trump quoting Scripture at Jerry Foulwell's evangelical liberty.
Listen on Monday, Donald Trump quoting Scripture at Jerry Falwell's Evangelical Liberty University.
Liberty University.
Good.
Up next, good morning, America, George Stephanopoulos talking with Jonathan Caro about the battle between Trump and Ted Cruz.
What about this factor now?
These talk show hosts like Rush Limbaugh weighing in.
We may have reached a pivotal point in this campaign where those influential voices on talk rodeo are starting to turn on Donald Trump.
Until now, these have been some of Trump's most reliable cheerleaders.
But in this latest fight, they are siding with Ted Cruz.
And it's not just Limbaugh.
That New York values attack from Cruz drove people right back to what Trump himself said 20 years ago.
As you know, he said he was pro-abortion rights, open to gay marriage because he is from New York, not from Iowa.
This is the attack that could really hurt.
And it's not just Limbaugh.
That's what Cruz uh in the tack forced people to go back and found Trump said that on Meet the Depress back in 1999 with uh Tim Russert, which sound right we also aired yesterday.
So, well, Jonathan Carl says we may have reached a pivotal point.
In the campaign, these influential voices on a right on talk radio are starting to turn on Trump.
Until now, these have been some of Trump's most reliable cheerleaders.
But in the latest fight, they're siding with Ted Cruz.
Trump was asked about this and said, Well, I am a real conservative, and Russia's been terrific to me, and Russia's really been uh amazing to me.
And I actually read what he said, and he's uh he's still amazing to me.
So I appreciate everything Russia's done for me, 100%.
Did you hear the joke?
Two Corinthians walk into a bar.
One of them said, did you hear what Donald Trump's...
There's a new report out that Hillary Clinton's private email server, X2X, Exposed some of America's greatest most important secrets.
You know, this keeps trickling out.
Uh, it really is, and it's been this way for well, how many months now?
Three or four since last fall, this drip drip drip of every day, maybe every other day, there's some little bit of news about Hillary and various scandals, and it's never monumental in one day.
But the cumulative effect, the impact of all these days added up.
This one now is pretty big.
Private email server exposed USA's most secret intelligence.
Now we've heard there are 150 FBI agents that are on this investigation.
There wasn't.
I mean, how serious can a Democrat debate be when the moderators in a Democrat debate don't even mention that?
150 FBI agents, so we're told.
We've also heard from people not part of the regime.
Joe DeGenova, lifetime careerist in the Justice Department with experience there, claims that he's seen so much evidence that they can't not indict.
They have to indict.
If they don't indict, there's going to be a revolt inside the DOJ and the FBI.
So we keep hearing this, but nothing happens.
And then Hillary in the debate starts echoing Obama and acting like Obama's her best bud.
Uh and people start speculating, yep, this is design Hillary's trying to get close, so he will not drop the hammer on or an indicter.
That news just keeps trickling out.
It's not all on the Republican side here.
There is tremendous upheaval throughout the American political system, which stands to be it's a campaign year, presidential year.
It's all normal.
We got a break.
Back after this.
▲
Export Selection