All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 10, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:20
September 10, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh no, what happened to the guys on line one and two?
Did they just bomb out up there?
Oh, geez.
You know, it's not their fault.
People can't stay on the hole forever.
And there's just too much going on.
We had somebody who wanted to weigh in and they're not bothered by Trump at all what he said about Fiorina.
And I just wanted you to hear it.
I didn't know what she was going to say, but other than, hey, they made fun of Trump's hair.
It doesn't matter to me.
But whoever was going to say I had a had a dropout.
And I just, I want to assure all of you on hold.
I'm going to get to you as quickly as I can here in this hour.
Welcome back.
Rushlin bought 800-282-2882 and the email address, El Rushbo at EIBnet.com.
So I got in here today and sternly says, so did you have a lot of fun with all the Apple stuff yesterday?
So let me tell you what I did.
I got home at 3.30, actually 3.45.
I raced home yesterday.
And the next time I looked at the clock, it was 11.30.
Here's what I did.
Apple released the Gold Master of their upcoming software for the watch version 2.0 for the iPhone and iPad version 9.0 and for the Mac 10.11 called El Capitan.
So I upgraded four phones to the Goldmaster of 9.0.
It takes a long time because you have to erase every phone if you want to do it right.
You have to erase every phone, restore.
And I set up these devices as brand new so that they're like out of the box with no cruft and crud from previous betas or apps or anything.
It takes a while.
So I did that.
And then I upgraded two watches.
And that was a nightmare because we're still on beta with these things and because they just don't come automatically over there.
You have to go get them.
And it is an absolute, just a time-consuming nightmare.
And because everything happens in a watch in terms of downloads and so forth is so slow, that took a while.
Then I put the Goldmaster of 10.11 El Capitan on three computers.
And it set all this stuff up from brand new.
And 11.30 is the next time I looked at the clock.
I mean, the time, it must have been eight hours.
The time I got home, sat down, started doing all this stuff.
But anyway, and they're going to release all this to the public on Wednesday, the watch software and the phone and iPad software Wednesday.
And I think on the 30th of September, the new computer software comes out.
But I just couldn't wait.
You know, I love this stuff.
I'm so excited.
So I had to get it on there.
Then I had, after that, I had to test it all out and made sure this.
I think I got to bed at 3 a.m.
So eight hours with four phones, two iPads, two watches, and three computers.
And I didn't eat anything.
I had a couple cigars and some Diet Cokes, and that was it.
So you asked, was I excited about?
And then, but here's the thing, to show you how just wacko I am.
The iPads, well, not the app, the phones that I spent a lot of time are going to be obsolete on September 25th.
When the new phones come out, I got to do it all over again.
The smart thing, just wait, just wait, you know, put it on one phone and be done.
No, no, no.
I just love it so much that I wanted every device I've got to be up to date with the latest.
Anyway, Bobby Jendel, I want to give you this little tidbit with the soundbite.
We have one audio excerpt of Bobby Jendel at the press club today.
But I've got to share with you the entire open to put this in context because he launches at Trump both barrels.
And it's clear to me, I think, what Jendel's objective is here.
And I'll say this before I play the soundbite and read to you the transcript of his, at least the opening of his speech.
I think what Jendel's doing, I could be wrong, of course, it's rare, but I could be.
There's a New York magazine story.
It says, Bobby Jendel upset that Trump is staling his act.
Okay, now I don't know specifically what that is.
But from that article, New York Magazine, Bobby Jendal has carefully planned to carve out a niche as the candidate of choice for Republicans who want a bombastic xenophobe in the White House, but find Ted Cruz too intellectual.
Now, by the way, that's New York Magazine name-calling.
Jendle does not think of himself as a xenophobe, and he does not think of himself as bombastic.
This is New York.
This is not liberal media characterizing.
I don't know why.
Why would you go talk to New York Magazine?
You know what's going to happen there.
And why would you go talk to, in Trump's case, Rolling Stone?
What is the point?
Rolling Stone makes things up about rapes on campus that don't happen.
What do you think they're going to do to you?
Oh, well, I'm not advising these people.
I'm not their consultant, so I just have to deal with it in frustration like you do.
But the New York Magazine piece says that Jindal's strategy is to carve out a niche as a candidate of choice, the candidate of choice, for Republicans who want a bombastic xenophobe in the White House, but are afraid that Ted Cruz is too robotic, too intellectual.
Jindal's antics included a video of himself taking part in a push-up contest.
But Trump has waltzed in and stolen his act, relegating Jindal to obscurity.
Now, before Jindal went out to the National Press Club speech today, his campaign promised on Twitter that they were going to see Bobby the brawler today.
We're going to see Bobby the brawler today in a speech attacking Trump as unserious.
Here's an excerpt before I read to you from the actual open.
This is Jindal at the National Press Club this morning.
Donald Trump is not a serious candidate.
He's a narcissist.
He's an egomaniac.
The only thing he believes in is himself.
The idea of the Donald Trump Act is great.
The reality of Donald Trump, however, is absurd.
He's non-serious.
He's a carnival act.
Here's the truth about Donald Trump.
Donald Trump is shallow.
He has no understanding of policy.
He is full of bluster.
He has no substance.
He lacks the intellectual curiosity to even learn.
Donald Trump is for Donald Trump.
And the question for conservatives is this.
Are we going to rely and trust proven conservative principles?
Or are we going to turn to a man who believes in nothing but himself?
Okay, now that is from the body of the speech.
I told you, Snirtley, I told you he's going to fire both barrels.
Here's the open.
And the open is a little bit different flavor from that, which is why I want to read it to you.
Today I'm going to put my own political mission aside and talk about something more important than myself, more important than any single candidate or person.
Our country is slipping away right before our very eyes.
We are descending down the path to socialism, dependence on governments becoming the new American dream.
We are unfazed by the selling of body parts as commodities.
And we are pathetically weak in international affairs.
America is slipping away right in front of us in real time.
And yet this is a moment of great opportunity for America.
This is a time when we can make dramatic changes, when we can embrace conservative ideals, and we can literally turn our country around.
I believe the country is ready for that.
You can see it in people's eyes.
You can read it in the polls.
America is ready for a politically incorrect, conservative revolution.
The liberalism and incompetence of the Obama administration have pushed us to the edge to the point where you can literally see the idea of America slipping away and people are dreading it.
And they're ready to stop that from happening.
The American people have a massive appetite for a rebirth, a massive appetite for making America great again.
So that's the context and the reason for what I'm going to say next.
And what he says next is the audio soundbite I just played for you.
This is why it's fundamentally important for you to have heard the open to the speech rather than just the sound bite.
Because you see, I could have come here and just played for you that one excerpt, and I could have given you an entirely different impression of Jindal's speech.
What he said next is this.
I like the idea of Donald Trump.
I like the idea of a D.C. outsider.
I like that he doesn't care about political correctness.
I like the fact that he says things that people are thinking but are afraid to say.
I like that he uses Ronald Reagan's theme of making America great again.
Trump's diagnoses is correct.
The professional political class in Washington, including Republicans, is incompetent and full of nonsense.
He's right.
The political class in Washington has abandoned us.
Trump has performed an important service by taking on the political class and exposing them for being completely full of nonsense.
But here's the problem.
Donald Trump is also full of nonsense.
Now, don't get me wrong.
His act is tremendous.
It's a sell-out show.
I've enjoyed it.
I laughed out loud when he read Lindsey Graham's cell number on live TV.
I got a kick out of him giving kids helicopter rides at the Iowa State Fair.
And I was amused when he said the people at Jeb's Town Hall were sleeping.
But it is now time for us to do what Donald would do and say the thing that everybody's thinking but is afraid to say out loud.
So I am going to do it.
The Donald Trump Act is great, and the idea of Donald Trump is great.
But the reality of Donald Trump is absurd.
He's a non-serious carnival act.
So here's the truth about Trump that we all know, but have been afraid to say.
Donald Trump is shallow.
He has no understanding of policy.
He's full of bluster, but has no substance.
He lacks the intellectual curiosity to even learn.
And this you recognize from the soundbite.
Donald Trump is not a serious person, Jendel said.
It's all a solo act.
It's all just a show.
And the joke is on us.
He is laughing all the way to the bank or to the polling station.
P.T. Barnum was never more right.
And then near the end of the speech, Jendle said, summer's over.
It's time to get serious about saving our country.
It's time to send Donald Trump back to reality TV.
It's time to tell Donald Trump, it's been great.
You've been great for ratings.
You're almost as fun as Don Rickles.
Show's been a blast.
We do, in fact, need to make America great again.
We do, in fact, need to fire everybody in Washington.
And we do, in fact, need to get rid of political correctness.
That's all true.
And we can make America great again.
But we will not do that by putting an unserious, unstable narcissist in the White House.
Country is worth saving, and this is our time to save it.
The conservative cause deserves more than a power-hungry shark who eats whatever's in front of him, because sooner or later, we will be the next meetle.
That's Jindal.
That's the thrust of Bobby Jindal.
Full transcript of his speech at the National Press Club today.
Take a brief time.
No, no, I'm just sharing it with you.
I have this sound bite, played the sound bite.
In light of everything here, you can now expect Trump is going to be loaded and fired back.
And again, it's what Jendal wants.
Remember, Jindal, don't forget now, this New York magazine piece theorizes that Jindal is trying to carve out a niche here.
And for people, he's trying to replace Cruz, replace Cruz.
People like Cruz think he's too intellectual or whatever.
So anyway, there's a strategy behind all this is the point.
We'll take a break, and I guess we'll get to phones.
I got to start getting some of those in or everybody's going to dwindle away here.
Sit tight, my folks.
Don't go away.
Here's another Bobby Jindal line, ladies and gentlemen, about Mr. Trump.
He said, we know that Mr. Trump has not read the Bible.
And we know this for a simple reason.
Donald Trump is not in the Bible.
So we know he has not read it.
It's cutting.
It's slicing.
And apparently these guys all recognize now what they have to do to break out, what they have to do to get named and mentioned, and that is get on Trump's bad side because he'll come after him.
Trump is now threatening to pull out of the CNN debate if they don't give the additional ad revenue that they're earning here to charity.
This is last night with Greta Van Susteren on the Fox News Channel.
She said, if Jeff Zucker over at CNN does not agree with your demand, as you wrote in that letter today, to donate the money, the ad revenue, to veterans, will you consider not showing up?
We're going to make a determination, but he should make a big donation.
And frankly, so should the other networks, because they're making a lot of money.
And I would like to see that money go to the vets.
So if he doesn't give the money, you won't show up.
We'll make a determination.
We're going to determine later whether or not we'll show up.
Trump's maintaining, before this, CNN was charging $5,000 a minute.
That's news that we had yesterday.
With the anticipated audience for the September 16th debate, CNN's charging $200,000 a minute.
And Trump, as a full-fledged capitalist and, by the way, a commissioned salesman, commission sales, well, if you can get the right deal of commission sales, you can become rich.
You get a percentage of everything, and you be the one to explain why it's happening.
You get yourself directly to the revenue stream.
That's what Trump considers himself to do.
He says, all right, five grand a minute before I show up, right?
200 grand a minute after I show up.
Who should get the money here?
You guys?
What are you doing?
You already own the cameras.
You're even not even using your studios.
You're using a Reagan library.
What are you guys doing for this?
Money should go to vets.
To the phones we go.
This is Jeff in Boyne City, Michigan.
Great to have you, sir.
I'm glad you waited.
I appreciate that.
Hello.
Hey, thank you, Rush.
Decades-long listener, first-time caller.
Great to have you here.
I'm a wee bit confused with the criticism over Donald Trump making comments about Carly's looks.
What I'd like to know if you could explain to me where the geopolitical lines are drawn anatomically.
Because people make fun of his hair, the spittle in the corner of his mouth, the colors he wear.
I mean, he's under the microscope.
Right.
Here's the thing, though.
There's a, you know this as well as I do.
There are double standards in this.
With a man.
I mean, how many, no, I don't want to go about it that way.
It is considered fair game to attack a guy's looks because it's not a guy's looks that are considered to be the most attractive aspect.
Well, it used to not be.
You know, with the low information voters and the pop culture crowd and their surface interests, it may well be now.
But men are judged in entirely different ways.
Meaning, if you want to make fun of Trump's hair color or hairstyle, it's fair season.
It's open season, fair game, whatever.
Men are not allowed to complain about that.
But women, you can't do it.
You're not supposed to go there.
Nobody can control the way they look.
Nobody had a right to choose whatever genes they got, no matter the fact that people go DNA shopping before they get married.
Now, I'm convinced of that.
I could name names.
I'd get in trouble if I did.
I could name a big name right now that went DNA shopping before they'd get married just before she had reproductive sex with some clown.
But you can't do that with women.
Are you suggesting, by the way, Jeff, are you just being provocative here, or do you think that this is no big deal and people should not be holding Trump to any kind of serious account for this?
No, I honestly think it's no big deal.
I mean, he's just simply firing back over all the criticism he receives.
Yeah, but did she criticize his hair?
Did she make fun of him?
No.
She individually did not.
All right.
So in the circumstances.
All is fair game.
If you're going to play in that arena, be prepared for it.
Well, I understand that.
But let's, do you work in an office?
I do.
How much latitude do you have to run around the office and start making fun of, let's say there's a horse-faced woman that works down the hall from you and you start talking about it?
Well, I certainly don't tell the why the long face joke.
I mean, but you wouldn't do it anyway.
You couldn't.
I mean, you'd be run out of the place, or you'd have a serious HR problem.
True, that, depending on the relationship you have with that person.
Even if you don't, somebody who's a friend of that person who may not like you is going to hear about it and take you right down to HR and you're not going to have any defense for it.
That's true.
I mean, it's thin ice.
So why is it in politics?
Everything's fair game, but in the office, in the firehouse, in a police station, or wherever else you want to go, it's not.
Well, that's where the PC has all seeped into.
I'll tell you, let me tell you, this has me flabbergasted in a lot of ways.
I mean, people have said far less than this kind of thing and have been destroyed by the media, have been run out of their lives of their businesses or what have you.
And this CNN, they're actually debating today while they're laughing about it, Whether or not this is a new day, whether it's okay, whether Trump can survive it with no condemnation.
We stick with the phones.
Here is Jason, Fort Myers, Florida.
Great to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
Long time listener, first time successful caller.
And I also want to comment on Trump's recent comments about Parliament Fiorina.
To me, that's not presidential at all.
I told Mr. Snerdley, in my mind, at least, that reminded me of a kid in fourth grade that can't, that's losing an argument, can't come up with anything better.
They just resort to, I know you are, but what am I?
That's all he's doing.
He can't articulate any position, really.
You know, you played off Ted Cruz, four points.
That's what a president does.
Donald Trump has a day or two to think of a comeback, and he just comes up with, yeah, well, you're ugly.
That's not presidential material.
So you think, if I heard you right, you think that Trump is doing all of this stuff because he doesn't really have positions that he can explain on issue after issue.
So this is how he's dealing with that.
Yeah, I don't think it's an intelligent comeback, and I don't even think it's a mature comeback in any way.
I don't think he has any points compared to somebody like Ted Cruz.
Bobby Jindal, pretty much, after you played, you know, I've been on the line for a while now, and you played Bobby Jindal's remarks, and he kind of summarizes my feelings of Trump, too.
Trump is just not presidential at all.
Presidents don't, or presidential candidates remark like that.
Now, that's an interesting question, and don't misunderstand.
I'm not debating.
I'm not disagreeing.
I'm probing.
When you say it's not presidential, I mean, I know what you mean, but to me, Obama isn't either.
I mean, if presidential is he gives off the air of competence.
Well, okay, he is.
But my God, he's a disaster, Jason.
He's an absolute disaster.
You know, it's like talking about defining somebody as intelligent or smart.
Really?
Are they smart because they can use words and phrases and pause in the right way to make themselves sound intellectual when they're absolutely blooming common sense idiots?
You know, what is smart?
So what is presidential?
You think name-calling is petty and childish.
Yes, I think to even further that, your Manchild reference to Obama can be continued into Trump's term, should he win.
But I think Trump, like it or not, he's going to have to work with Democratic senators and congressmen and diplomats and all kinds of people.
What's he going to resort?
Just petty little remarks like that when he doesn't want to deal with somebody?
Well, I don't know.
Some of the that could actually be fun.
I mean, frankly, is it really, for example, is it really impolitic or in the shallow end to refer to Anthony Weiner as a perv or is it true?
And is it presidential or not presidential?
I mean, you know what Anthony Weiner did, right?
Yeah, yeah.
Okay.
Trump's a guy's a perv.
He's a sick perv.
His wife has got secret classified data, probably sharing with his perv.
It's a situation we shouldn't have to deal with, blah, blah, blah.
Per virgin's a choice, though, but your hair, well, I guess your hairstyle is a choice, but how Carly Fiorina was born or anybody else is born, that's not a choice.
And it's, I don't know.
To me, it's just the same as a fourth grader that can't come up with any better argument, and so just resorts to I know you are, but what am I?
And he even had time to think out a better response than that.
And after a day, he still can come up with something better.
Okay, I get your drift.
I know what you're saying.
This is not the kind of stuff that you want to hear a president saying, and so you don't want to hear a presidential candidate saying it.
It's beneath what you believe the station of the office is.
And I suspect a lot of people agree with you.
But on the other hand, there are a lot of people who think all of this enforced politeness and propriety is what's leading the country astray because it's preventing people from being honest about the things they actually see and believe from high positions of leadership that are being done to destroy the country.
And at that point, you throw politeness out and you call a spade a spade, whatever it is.
And that's why Trump, one of the many reasons why Trump continues to grow his support.
We'll see.
You know, I guarantee the establishment is probably rubbing their hands together today, wherever these people gather.
You know, I don't know whether their clubhouse is.
So it's not a clubhouse.
I'm sorry.
The grill room or the country club.
I don't know where the establishment goes, but I guarantee wherever they are, they're rubbing their hands in glee.
He's done it now.
You just don't call a woman ugly and get away with it.
Not in American politics.
You just don't do it.
Rubbing their hands.
They think this is it.
They think the next series of polls are going to show a bunch of people abandoning Trump because of this.
Here's Mike in Salt Lake City.
You're next.
It's great to have you.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, I think that Trump is a big fan of your show.
He's acknowledged that.
He said that.
I think he's taken a page out of your playbook, Rush.
I think you can take credit for this one that was several months ago.
I was waiting for this.
I remember listening to your show.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I've been waiting for this.
You stating that you didn't want to particularly look at Hillary Clinton for the next eight years.
No, it's not exactly what I said.
I was speaking actually sympathetically to Mrs. Clinton.
He's not buying that out there.
I hear him laughing about this.
I asked the question, because men can age and they are assumed to be maturing and becoming smarter and more powerful.
When women do, it's this is not the same.
Does the American people really want to watch a woman age dramatically in office when it's the Oval Office?
I did.
I asked that question.
You're right.
Not Hillary Clinton Rush.
I mean, Carly Fiorona, for your AI, I could watch her age.
I think she's an attractive woman, but not Hillary Clinton, not for the next four to eight years.
Yeah.
Well, I've been waiting for somebody to remember that, and I knew it was going to.
But I did offer that when it, in the context of that was, it was, I don't know if it was during, exactly during Operation Chaos, but it was around that time.
And we were trying to keep her candidacy alive just for the sake of material here on the show because the Republican nomination was over.
McCain had it wrapped up.
And how exciting was that?
Now, we needed a Democrat campaign to go on.
So Operation Chaos was to keep Hillary alive, keep that campaign alive.
And it required me to be somewhat sympathetic here and there and supportive within bounds of what she was trying to do.
And then something had happened.
Somebody had made some comment about pantsuits or some such thing.
And I remember coming into the studio that day with mock outrage and how anybody could be so rude and impolite to such a valiant woman who has given everything she had, which wasn't much, for this country.
Let me take a brief departure, change the direction just a bit before we get back to phone calls and Trump and Carly Fiorina.
I have to tell you, folks, I am still capable of being surprised, and I will admit that I'm being surprised by an overwhelming number of reactions to Trump's references to Fiorina's appearance.
One of the common threads that I'm seeing is, hey, everybody, they want equality.
Well, come on.
This is what happens in politics.
This is what happens in primaries.
Everything's fair game.
What's the big deal?
So we'll see.
My evidence here is purely anecdotal, nothing scientific to it.
But switching gears for just a second.
In the last couple of three days, there have been a combination of news stories and pundit reactions to those stories that make me think that within the bowels of the drive-by media and a Democrat Party apparatus, they are literally beginning to panic over Hillary.
There are just two bits of evidence from today.
One is, well, actually three.
One is there's a new, what is it, Quinnipiac University poll out there in Iowa.
And for the first time, Bernard Sanders, not a Democrat, a registered independent, admitted socialist, now leads Hillary Clinton 41 to 40%.
That has not happened.
And that 40% for Hillary represents an 11-point drop in two months in Iowa.
And now, one in three self-identified Democrats say she is not honest or trustworthy.
That's another bit of news that we've had polling data recent days, those three top three names that people, top three words people associate with Hillary, liar, untrustworthy, dishonest.
And then Chris Saliza writing today at the Washington Post upon hearing about this Iowa poll, it might be time for Hillary Clinton to start panicking.
And then there's a tweet from the irrepressible Karen Tumblety, who used to be at Time magazine, now at the Washington Post.
And the tweet is a picture of a practically empty room where Hillary is conducting an event for women in Columbus, Ohio.
And her tweet is not exactly a packed house for Hillary Clinton women's event in Columbus.
And believe me, it looks like the only people that are there are media people.
They're holding cameras and pencils and microphones and recorders and so forth.
It's an empty room.
She didn't attract people to book tour.
She didn't sell any books.
People know she didn't write it, and they wouldn't have cared if she did.
Because Hillary Clinton does not have a connection with people.
She never has had.
I won't bore you going through this again, but it's undeniable.
Hillary Clinton does not have—this is the mistake the media makes, the Democrat Party makes.
I think a lot of people make.
They think that Hillary's beloved, that there's an actual deep bond or connection that Democrat voters have.
And there isn't.
She's where she is because there's a D by her name, and her last name is Clinton.
If not for those two things, nobody would care who she is and nobody would know.
She is the result of a lifetime PR hype job.
Where are the accomplishments, for example?
Where is the serious achievements?
Where are they?
Independent of anything her husband's done at the party.
Where are they?
There aren't any.
The woman's been on the come for I don't know how many years, meaning, and what I mean by that, she's the next big thing.
It's her turn, it's the next big thing.
Hillary is going to whatever.
But there's no reason for it.
There's no curriculum that says she's great behind her.
There isn't a series of, getting elected, Senate, big deal.
What you do there?
Loss to Obama.
So I think in the media here, when you start seeing people referring to it may be time to panic, it tells me that the panic has already started.
And I think the media people know it.
And rather than write that, this is how they are staying credible.
They know there's panic going on behind the scenes.
So rather than write that, because that would be devastating, they instead acknowledge that they're aware of it happening by saying, it may be time to start.
It's a clever little journalistic technique.
Now, I want to play this soundbite again, and this is what we had.
This is when we had this one, Tuesday.
And yet people didn't start talking about this till last night and yesterday.
It's another example of what I mean by you're in a cutting edge of societal evolution.
This is from World News Tonight, Tuesday night, David Muir.
And this was where everybody was analyzing this from the standpoint of what she said about her emails and how she appeared.
What was her stature, her countenance?
Does she look dear in the headlights?
And it escaped people other than me for 24 hours what she actually said, among other things.
Yes, of course, because it really is hard.
My mother had a terrible childhood.
She was abandoned by her parents.
She was rejected by her grandparents.
She was literally working as a housemaid at the age of 14.
That's right.
And she told me every day, you've got to get up and fight for what you believe in, no matter how hard it is.
And I think about her a lot.
I miss her a lot.
I wish she were here with me.
And I remember that.
And I don't want to just fight for me.
I don't, I mean, I can have a perfectly fine life not being president.
I'm going to fight for all the people like my mother.
Listen.
They need somebody in their corner.
And they need a leader who cares about them again.
That's what I happen to notice.
I remember making a big deal out of that.
Wait a minute.
What does that mean about Obama?
What is she saying about Obama?
I asked two days ago.
And again yesterday.
And then I see it becomes big news last night and this morning.
You were onto it first.
Remember, we played this back-to-back with that Soundbite New Hampshire 2008.
She started talking how hard somebody asked her, how do you deal with all the this criticism?
It's hard.
You know, it's really hard, but you can't get it.
You have to keep.
No, sorry.
It's hard.
You have to keep going.
It still spoke in a robotic way.
Right there.
She wants to know that people can trust that she can be in their corner because they need a leader who cares about them again.
And after making that point, if you're realizing that, then I remind you about Biden on Labor Day weekend marching with the union people in Pittsburgh, ragging on the economy.
Something terribly wrong in the economy.
Right, right.
Well, whose economy is it?
In fact, old Joe was even put in charge of making sure the stimulus money was passed out without any favoritism or scandal or whatever.
How'd that work out?
Yeah, yeah, there's other stuff out there.
Of course, we still have another big, exciting broadcast hour straight ahead of us.
More of your phone calls in there as well.
So, no, I'm not going to go, I'm not going to tease you with it.
Although there is this: one in five voters say that immigration, somebody stance in immigration, it'll be critical to their vote.
I thought it'd be higher than that.
It's a Gallup poll.
We'll be back.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection