All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:24
August 25, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's Anchorman is away and this is your EIB anchor baby Mark Stein live from far northern New Hampshire hard by the Canadian border.
If you're fleeing the country do swing by and say hello.
You can't miss us.
There's a big sign on the interstate saying last rush guest host before the border.
So do drop by and say hello.
We're talking about anchor babies because Jeb Bush has clarified his position.
This morning it had an interesting report on the radio about how Jeb Bush had hit back, punched back at the reports that he was low energy, as Donald Trump put it, and that he was on fire last night, wherever it was, giving some speech down on the Texan border.
And they didn't have a clip from it.
And I realized shortly afterwards that the reason the reporter didn't have a clip for it was that this guy, Bush, had been all fired up because he was giving the speech in Spanish.
And it's true.
If you look at this clip, he's in some border town on the U.S. side where 90% of the town speaks Spanish.
But don't worry, that's coming to a state near you soon.
90% of the town speaks Spanish, so he's giving the speech in Spanish.
And it is, in fact, amazing that he gives a far more animated performance in Spanish than he does in English.
Now, I don't claim to understand every nuance.
I'm not a Spanish speaker.
But you can just tell his body language, his animation is more vibrant in Spanish than when he does that sad-sack thing with the hunched shoulders and he's talking in English about Common Core or whatever.
I mean, a lot of times it is just the language.
It's like people generally sound more romantic when they're talking in French, you know, because they go into the full Jacques Chirac hitting on the Syrian president's wife.
and it's it can be even if you don't know understand a word what he's you can just is if you look at jeb bush speaking in spanish he's like far more and far more animated about it But he's clarified his position that he means Asian anchor babies, Chinese anchor babies, not Mexican anchor babies.
So he doesn't want to repeal the 14th Amendment, you constitutional scholars out there.
He'd just like to shave it back to a kind of 13 and 7 8ths amendment where we just get rid of the Chinese anchor babies.
That's his thing.
Headlines, Byron York of the Washington Examiner has a piece called Trump on Immigration.
What about the Democrats problems?
He's got three headlines here.
Trump's immigration plan could spell doom for the GOP, read a headline on a syndicated column by George Will.
Trump's recklessness threatens GOP, read a headline on a Charles Krauthammer column.
Donald Trump reveals the ugly side of the right, read a headline on a piece by the Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin.
These are all three conservative columnists.
I'm beginning to get the picture.
You don't really need left-wing media bias when the so-called conservative columnists are winning to do this.
Byron York's point is that actually the radical position on immigration here is Hillary Clinton's.
Hillary Clinton is proposing to support the unilateral executive edict giving legal protections who came to the United States illegally as children.
She's also pledged to support Obama's court-challenged unilateral executive edict.
In other words, this is the one that judges, the same kind of judges who've legalized gay marriage and that Democrats are hot for.
The judges have said that Obama's executive action giving legal protection to the parents of these now no longer illegal children, she said she'll do that too.
Okay, so it's not just the children now who've been legalized, but she's also said she's going to support, she supports Obama's action legalizing their parents too, even though judges have said it's not legal.
And then she's promised citizenship to all the others.
We can't wait any longer, she said.
We can't wait any longer for a path to full and equal citizenship.
Believe me, any legal immigrant, and I'd never make that mistake again, but any legal immigrant knows that waiting longer is actually the definition of the United States Legal Immigration Service, not the INS.
What's it called this week?
BCIS?
Is that what it's called?
I can't remember.
They keep shuffling the letters around to throw you off the track.
So when you've been waiting 10, 12, 17 years and you want to know what's happened to your application, they've always changed the initials so you can never find it in the phone book.
But it's, I think it's BCIS they're calling it this week.
And she said, we can't wait any longer.
She said, we can't wait.
Waiting longer is actually the business model of BCIS.
It's chiseled.
It's the motto.
When you go in there to the beautiful stone building in Washington with the columns and everything, it's actually chiseled in the stone above the front door.
Wait longer.
You know, we go the extra mile for you to make you wait longer.
But she's saying, no, no, no, these people who bust into the country illegally, we're going to legalize.
We're going to leave.
Why isn't that the radical position?
Because she's incentivizing the next wave.
Why doesn't Jennifer Rubin or Charles Krauthammer or George Will have a...
Why doesn't that strike them as more radical?
Why...
Why is that?
I mean, I'm not asking George Will, Charles Krauthammer, Jennifer Rubin to go full-blown right-wing lunatic.
I'm just asking them to support an immigration policy as right-wing as, say, Sweden's or France's or Ireland's or New Zealand's.
All the countries that the Democrats think we should be more like.
One reason that they're not like us is because they have an entirely different immigration policy, where you can't just give a baby, as Rush was talking about last week, you can't just have a baby in a New Zealand hospital or an Irish hospital and be a citizen.
America is the only country in the developed world that does that apart from Canada.
And as I said yesterday, Canada only does it because you guys do it.
And it doesn't work for America on a scale far beyond the way it deforms the Canadian immigration pattern.
And Byron York's right.
The radical position here, the one that she should be on the defensive about is Hillary, is Hillary Clinton's position.
The only reason she isn't on the defensive is because all the stories about Hillary Clinton are just about classified emails.
And about now the story is that friends have suggested she might temporarily suspend her campaign.
This is growing national security questions about Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State are drowning out much of her message as a presidential candidate and causing many of her fellow Democrats to worry about the future of her campaign.
Is it time for Clinton to put her campaign on a temporary hold, on a temporary hold?
This is a story in Rasmussen Reports.
We've heard a story that her abuse of this system by having confidential top-secret materials on a private server was known to America's allies so that the British Foreign Secretary wouldn't email Hillary direct.
He would only email Huma Aberdin and other people who had state.gov email addresses and ask them if they would send it, show it to Hillary.
In other words, he didn't want to be, he understood that she had an insecure email address.
So what's the betting that the Russians know and the Chinese know?
If the British know and they don't want to use that email address, then you can assume the Russians and the Chinese know.
We now see that one of her emails discussed the security and travel arrangements of Christopher Stevens in 2011, the U.S. ambassador to Libya.
And what do you know?
A year later, Christopher Stevens is dead because somebody knew, somebody knew that Ambassador Stevens would not be at his embassy in Tripoli that night, but would be in Benghazi.
Nobody, why isn't that dooming Hillary?
Why is it that wanting to talk about observing the laws of this country somehow puts you beyond the pale, but getting an ambassador killed while you're Secretary of State?
I mean, I don't understand the news values of this country.
This country is the worst, most stinking, awful, dullest newspapers in the English-speaking world.
And by that I include the Pakistani papers, which are better written and have a better news sense than the American newspapers.
We've got a shocking revelation here that the travel movements of the ambassador who was killed a year later are discussed in Hillary's emails that she keeps in some guy's toilet in Colorado.
And she pays no price for that.
She pays no price for that.
You know, about a year and a half ago, I was given a speech up in Ottawa.
And a couple of days before the speech, the premier of Alberta had been down in Arizona vacationing.
Because if you live in Arizona, you'll know that aside from all the Mexicans living there illegally, you also have Canadians who legally have bought themselves some nice little winter houses there and the subdivisions full of Canadian snowbirds.
She's down there in Arizona, and one of her predecessors as Premier of Alberta dies, and she needs to get back in a hurry for the funeral.
So they hop on a plane, and because she claimed as a business expense, the travel fare of her children, which came to $8,000 Canadian, she had to resign from office for an $8,000 expense.
An $8,000 expense rendered her unfit for office as Premier of Alberta.
She had to resign.
She's gone.
History.
A guy, there's a trial going up there at the moment, a guy who supposedly claimed $100,000 in expenses wasn't entitled to.
Kicked out of the Senate.
And he's on trial at the moment on a criminal trial.
We have a situation.
So you've got an $8,000 offender and $100,000 offender.
Meanwhile, down here, down here, you've got a Secretary of State who is using some no-name server to discuss the travel movements of an ambassador in the most dangerous part of the world.
And the ambassador subsequently is dead a year later.
So you can't call him to testify.
You can't call him to testify at all.
He's gone.
He's dead.
And it's not on the front page of the New York Times.
And it's not leading ABC News or CBS news or NBC news.
You know, all the time the Democrats talk about, oh, why can't we be more like Canada?
Why can't we be more like Scandinavia?
Why can't we be more like these other Western countries that are social democratic and all the rest of it?
Because you're too corrupt.
In the end, it's not even about left-wing or right-wing.
You're corrupt.
You're corrupt.
And say what you like about those wimpy Scandinavians, but they come by their left-wing drivel, honestly.
Here, it's just corruption.
It's just filthy, disgusting corruption.
Why won't the New York Times put this email discussing Christopher Stevens' travel arrangements on the front page?
Why won't NBC News lead with it?
Why won't CBS News lead with it?
It's nothing to do.
Why do even conservative columnists here think you're hateful?
You're a hateful, hateful person because you want to move to the same immigration policy as France and Sweden.
That's what Charles Krauthammer and George Will and Jennifer Rubin are saying that you can't even discuss it to suggest that America could possibly move to the same immigration policy as hateful places like Ireland and Norway.
Oh, how you can't even mention that.
This will doom the GOP.
That's why the Republican Party is useless and the Democrat Party is corrupt.
Mark Stein for Rush will take your call straight ahead.
Mark Stein, in for us on the EIB network, let's go to Chris in Kansas City, Missouri.
Chris, you are live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
Yeah, I am totally good for securing the border, getting these people off our welfare system.
But when you start talking about Donald Trump wants to ship off 30 million people, it just started making me think, what is that going to do to our economy when you ship off 30 million people?
What is that going to do to our housing economy?
Is that the reason that the Republicans don't want to deport anyone?
Well, look, that's George.
George Wills got this argument that if you were to deport whatever it is, 11 million, 15 million, 30 million, 127 million, then the buses that would be required to deport them would stretch all the way from here to Papua New Guinea.
And it's easy to make arguments like that.
But after 9-11, there were some Pakistani New Yorkers living in New York illegally, and a couple of them came up on the radar of the INS because for about a week after 9-11, because there was a big smoking crater in the middle of New York, the immigration bureaucracy took immigration seriously.
So they went and rounded up three, four, five, seven, a dozen Pakistanis in New York who'd come to their attention because they'd been in email chains with the guys who pulled off 9-11.
And I happen to be heading to Montreal about a week later, and at the border crossing on I-87 at the New York State-Quebec border, there's this like big, big line of people.
And I say to the guy, what is that?
He goes, they're Pakistanis from New York who, because a dozen were rounded up, thousands of them then voluntarily left.
The idea that you're going to need to deport 10, 15 million people is ridiculous.
And George Will advances it because it's not going to happen.
What would happen once you began serious enforcement of the immigration laws is that it would be too much trouble for people to stay.
Look at it from your point of view, Chris.
You can't, as an American, you couldn't go anywhere and open a bank account now because they passed this thing called the Fat Cat Act, right?
That was passed in Congress.
You can't go to Toronto and open a bank account.
You can't go to Bermuda and open a bank account.
You can't go to Paris and open a bank account.
You can't go to Geneva and open a bank account because no bank anywhere on the planet wants to do business with Americans because this Congress passed this thing called the Fat Cat Act that makes it impossible for Americans to have a bank account anywhere around the world.
So the same government that can make it impossible, that can apply enough pressure on a bank in Tokyo or a bank in Sydney to say, I'm not going to let Chris of Kansas City, Missouri open a bank account, that same government then turns around and says, but we can't do anything to stop Jose, who's in America illegally, opening a bank account at the branch of the first bank of Kansas City, Missouri.
Don't you understand that this is incompatible?
The big security state that George Will says is necessary is already here.
The difference is it's being used to make your life hell if you try to fly from Kansas City to Chicago.
It's being used to make your life hell if you happen to buy a beach place in the Turks and Caicos and want to open a bank account in Grand Turk.
But the big security state, it's reading every single email and telephone call.
It knows every single telephone call you've placed, every email you've made.
But apparently Donald Trump's scheme to stop wire transfers back to Mexico is impossible.
The big government state already exists.
It's just turned on you and legal people in the country legally rather than those who are here illegally, Chris.
Well, thank you.
Okay.
I think that was a satisfied customer.
I hope so.
Listen, this business about collapsing the economy, what is it now?
It's up to 97 people, million people out of the workforce.
We have the lowest workforce participation in American history.
In part because illegal immigration on this scale to the point where 8% of the babies born in the country are illegal, you imagine the 13% of California schoolchildren who are the children of illegals.
You imagine what the wages are here.
They're miserable.
They're flatlined.
I said yesterday, if you're born in the bottom 20% in this country now, your chance, chances are you're stuck there because wages are depressed, because the country's full of people willing to do those jobs illegally.
Yes, America's Anchorman is away, and this is your official 14th Amendment certified EIB anchor baby sitting in while Rush takes a day off.
Rush will be back tomorrow for authentic full-strength all-American excellence in broadcasting through the end of the week.
So don't miss that.
I've been talking, and I should perhaps clarify this.
I've been talking about the general uselessness of the Republican Party for much of the day.
And I mean, in Washington, things are different according to which part of the country you're in at the state level.
But occasionally, even in relatively unfavorable electoral circumstances, Republicans can get things done.
And if you're one of those parents or you're one of those students who's just starting at an American college or university and you're figuring out what you're going to do about six-figure college debt and all the rest of it, this story of what's happened in Washington state will be of interest to you.
State Senator Andy Hill from Washington State is on the line.
And you actually won one for the good guys, Andy.
Good to have you with us.
Oh, thank you, Mark.
Yeah, we had a big victory, a historic victory in Washington State by lowering tuition for the first time in the state's history.
Because as far as most people know, it's just supposed to go up, up, up far more than the rate of inflation.
And you'd actually had a situation where it had doubled in the years from 2002 to 2012.
So, in what people think of as the difference between yesterday and today, and in a period of relatively low inflation where houses and salaries haven't doubled, but mysteriously, tuition at Washington state colleges and universities somehow managed to double.
Well, and interestingly enough, we were under single-party rule during that entire time in the state.
Washington kind of tends to be a blue state.
And, you know, it was really nothing less than a hidden tax on the middle class.
What the Democrats did was they would cost shift the cost of tuition off to parents and families and students and spend that money otherwise on their programs and rewarding their special interests.
Right.
And they have, in the big education bureaucracy, they have a lot of that's that's one of the loyalist of Democrat voting blocks.
Now, you said that your state is a blue state, and nobody's suggesting that there's been some kind of conservative revolution in the state of Oregon.
You don't really have, you don't hold the governorship, you don't hold the House, and you don't hold, and you barely kind of control the Senate.
Is that correct, Andy?
That's correct.
About three years ago, we took over a 25-24 majority in the Senate with the help of two fiscally conservative Democrats.
Now we have a 26-23 advantage with one of those Democrats with us.
So we barely control one-third of the legislative process, and yet we were able to kind of turn back the tide of a Democratically controlled House that just wanted to raise taxes and pay off special interests and a Democratic governor who was really, he had an extreme green agenda at the expense of literally everything else.
And just to explain the way things work here in Washington, you just found a couple of fiscally conservative Democrats who were willing to work with you on this and then made it happen.
That's right.
That's all you needed.
That's all it took.
That's right.
And we actually have an outright Republican majority right now in the Senate.
And that's, you know, two years ago when we took over, we managed to freeze tuition for the first time in a generation against the Democrats' wishes.
And then two years later in 2015, we were able to cut tuition up to 20% at our colleges and universities.
Yeah, and that's actually a four-figure sum that parents and students are saving.
It's like it's real money that they're not having to pay.
It's a quarter billion dollar tax relief to the middle class.
And it's wildly popular, more popular than I think we would have ever expected with families and with students.
Yeah, because it's not really a left-wing, right-wing thing.
If you've got students that you're sending to universities, you benefit from that regardless of what your ideology is.
In that case, it's the sort of classic issue that has no downside for you from that point of view.
No, and it also helps, you know, we have students in Washington State graduating with an average of $25,000 of debt.
So it also helps them get their feet on the ground and get their careers launched and making them great citizens and great taxpayers.
But you've done it across the board because I think at the maximum, it's 20%, but all the way, even at like the community college level, which is the kind of bargain in economic terms, but you even managed to cut that by 5%.
We did.
We did.
We wanted to capture as large a swath of relief as possible.
And when we looked at the numbers, we figured this is the best way to deliver the most value to the most people.
Now, just to be clear, what we're talking about here, because again, the problem with Washington is that when they talk about cuts, they actually mean cuts in the rate of increase.
What you're doing here now is actually reducing it in hard dollar terms for people who are going to start college this year.
In other words, it's real money.
It's not just some abstract exercise like Washington accounting.
No, if you were in college last year and you go to college this year, you're going to be paying at somewhere like the University of Washington when this is fully implemented.
You'll be paying about $2,000 a year less.
Those are real dollars.
Right, right.
And which is what a cut is supposed to be.
That's right.
And just you said the average student leaves with that $25,000 in debt.
Just to connect the things we've been talking about this morning, Americans now have about $1.3 trillion in private college debt, which is about the equivalent of the GDP of Mexico.
I mean, it's a huge amount.
It's actually just when you think your kids are grown up and they're ready to go out into the world, suddenly you have these huge amounts of money that either the parents or the children have to find something to do with.
Otherwise, they're ineligible for middle-class employment effectively, aren't they, Andy?
It isn't.
You can't buy a home.
You can't start your own business if you've got this anchor hanging around your neck.
Yeah, yeah.
And you say it's been popular with both Democrats and Republicans in terms of your electorate.
The electorate is elated over it.
It is wildly popular.
When we froze tuition two years ago, we really didn't.
We were surprised at the response there from the electorate.
Now, again, not as popular with the governor and the Democratic lawmakers, but with the broad electorate, it is just wildly popular.
And it shouldn't be a surprise.
I mean, they've had this tax kind of forced down their throat over the last 10 years, and it's rare that you see real tax relief.
Now, do you think you can use this not to be all because we're talking about the nobility of education and everything, but do you think you could actually use this to grubby partisan advantage in the sense that it's clear that Democrats in your house and in the governor's office are essentially prioritizing their interest groups over the interest of their electorate?
Do you think you can persuade a significant chunk of the electorate to reward you for actually putting $2,000 in their pocket?
Well, I think so.
I think it definitely helps the brand.
It shows that we're results driven.
We're not talking about it.
We're not giving it lip service.
We actually have the leadership to go through and govern responsibly and govern with the people in mind instead of politics and special interests.
Well, that's good news.
Thanks for telling us about this, Andy.
Rush mentioned this last week, and Rush cited it as an example of what can be done.
And as you explained, you now do have a majority in the Senate.
But basically, at the time you began trying to do this, it was basically you had half the Senate and you picked up a couple of Democrats who you persuaded to see it your way and you accomplished something, Andy.
And that is a rare inspirational story at this time when we're told far too often that nothing can be done.
So thanks for taking the time to talk with us about it today.
That was my pleasure, Mark.
And, you know, the key was we all stuck together and we all kept our eye on the prize.
That's right.
You great people here in Washington State.
Yeah, that's good.
Thanks a lot, Andy.
That's State Senator Andy Hill from the Washington State Senate, where they actually cut something, and it was of huge benefit to the voters of that state, regardless of whether you're Democrat or Republican.
As he was just explaining, between last year's college bill and this year's college bill, you're $2,000 better off.
This thing that had rampaged out of control all of this century, doubling in the years between 2002, 2012, you've now got 20% cuts at regional colleges, 15% cut at the University of Washington and Washington State University, all the way down to 5% cuts even at community college.
So actually, fiscal conservatism, a rare victory, and the people who benefit are not the special interest groups, but the citizens.
Mark Stein, in for Rush.
We'll take more of your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein, in for rush on the EIB network.
What are we?
We're like an hour and just like halfway through the show.
I got nothing to talk about because yesterday, you recall, I made some mildly dismissive remark about Rick Wilson, this member of the Republican consultant industrial complex.
There was him and there was, who is it, Charlie Black, who worked on the McCain-Romney campaign, McCain and Romney campaigns.
These guys, they go from one terrific campaign to another campaign.
And I made a mild, you know, a mild crack.
These guys all live in some bizarro alternative universe at the foot of some alternative Mount Rushmore where all their winning candidates are lined up.
McCain, Romney, Bob Dole, Wendell Willkie, Thomas Dewey, and Rick Wilson, you, you, I'm willing to tweet me, tweet me Rush's home number, and I'll call you director, and we can thrash this out man-to-man, you little punk-ass foreigner.
How dare you do this?
And we said, obviously, we're not going to tweet Russia's home number.
That would be an outrageous breach of security.
It would be like the Russians getting hold of Hillary Clinton's fax machine in a toilet in Colorado.
So we reached out, our head of GOP Consultant Industrial Complex Outreach, DM'd Rick Wilson to say, send us a phone.
You want to come on the show?
Because he's been doing this, ah, that gutless pansy, that little fairy boy, Girlie Panstein, doesn't have, he doesn't have the guts to take me on.
So he's been doing all this stuff.
And we said, send us an email number or a phone number where we can get hold of you.
And instead, he's just been tweeting, oh, I'm at a meeting.
The meeting's overrunning a bit.
He's having a meeting to discuss the winning ad-buy they're doing for the Lindsey Graham campaign.
They're spending $200 million on advertising in select swing counties in Iowa.
And he's tied up in that meeting, so he can't come out and talk to me now.
But Rick Wilson, if you're listening, we've asked you, we've DM'd you, as the hipsters say, if you could send us, if you could send us a phone number, if you could send us an email address, if you could send us the number of your 1978 fax machine in the basement, we will get back to you and you can come.
We can thrash it out man to man.
And otherwise, if you don't want to do that, if you want to, I'll send you the fare for a greyhound bus ticket and I'll meet you at an interstate rest area on I-91 and we can have pistols at dawn then if you want to do it that way too.
But I got nothing to talk about now.
So I tell you what, I might as well plug my book for a minute or so because President Obama is going and giving a speech on climate change in Vegas.
He came back from Martha's Vineyard, right?
And immediately he goes, the markets are collapsing.
The New York, London, Shanghai, down, down, down.
And he decides that's the perfect day to give a speech on climate change.
And I've written a new book.
It's called A Disgrace to the Profession.
It's not about what other GOP consultants think of Rick Wilson.
Don't worry, it's not about that.
A disgrace to the profession is the story of the most famous science graph of the 21st century, the global warming hockey stick, and the shenanigans that were required to waft it upwards.
It was in Al Gore's movie.
It was taught in schools around the world.
And it is, scientifically speaking, complete rubbish.
And yet when Obama stands up in public, as he did in Vegas and says the science is settled, there's no argument.
When John Kerry says only you flat earthers are disagreeing with that, that's not true.
In fact, there are thousands of scientists who think that the cartoon climatology of global warming is complete nonsense.
They're in my book.
It's called A Disgrace to the Profession.
It comes out in a few days' time.
And I'm going to be working the plug circuit fairly seriously when it does come out.
But it's available for pre-order at Amazon.
And it is cracking stuff, if I do say so myself, because you think a lot of this science stuff is going to be too complicated to wrap Wrap your head around and lay people won't be able to understand it.
In fact, this science, the global warming science, a lot of it is so thin that it actually literally relies on one or two trees purporting to tell you the temperature of the entire planet.
That is how insanely stupid it is.
Nobody believes that.
No serious person who looks at this science believes it.
So if you ever wanted to have all the facts in a nice digestible form about what is wrong with this cartoon Global Warming Science, then my little contribution, it's called A Disgrace to the Profession, and it is available now for pre-order in e-book form, your Kindles and your Nooks and your whatnots, as well as in old-fashioned print form, where we've destroyed so many trees to print all the books that people will want about that.
There will not be enough tree rings left to divine the temperature in the year 700.
So we think this is like the handiest, neatest way to get all the facts about global warming in one form.
It's called a disgrace to the profession.
As I said, I got nothing to say now.
I'm waiting for Rick Wilson.
He's promised me he's in a meeting because Strom Thurmond apparently is thinking of throwing his hat in the ring and he's thinking of working on Strom's campaign for president.
And so he's in a big meeting.
As soon as he's out of the meeting, we're going to try and get him back on the air.
Mark Stein in Forush, more straight ahead.
Mark Stein in Forush.
You may have heard about this Ashley Madison thing.
No relation to James Madison, I don't think.
I don't think Ashley Madison is his or is James Madison's great-great-great-great-great-great-granddaughter or whatever, although that is actually the history of the Republic in a nutshell, from founding father to porno site.
But Ashley Madison, you've Josh Duggar was named, and apparently some of the big-time jihadists were also availing themselves of the services of Ashley Madison.
So these devout Muslims aren't above getting it on with the filthy infidel whores if the price is right and the arrangements can be made.
But there's a piece here by Ruth Bargolis: Why are we denying that women used Ashley Madison?
And it's basically objecting on feminist grounds that we're just making a fuss about the men like the jihadists and Josh Duggar who all signed up with Ashley Madison, but all the women looking for a good time who signed up with Ashley Madison are being protected.
▲
Export Selection