All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:24
August 25, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, America's Anchorman is away, and this is your EIB anchor baby, Mark Stein live from far northern New Hampshire, hard by the Canadian border.
If you're uh if you're fleeing the country, do swing by and say hello.
You can't miss us.
There's a big sign on the interstate saying last rush, guest host before the border.
So do do do drop by and say uh say hello.
Uh we're talking about anchor babies, uh, because Jeb Bush has clarified his position.
Um there was uh uh w this morning that we it had an interesting report on the radio about how um how Jeb Bush uh had r had hit back, punched back at um the reports that he was uh low energy, as Donald Trump put it, uh and that he was on fire last night, uh, wherever it was, giving some speech down on the Texan border.
And they didn't have a clip from it, and uh I realized shortly afterwards that the rear the the reason the reporter didn't have a clip for it was that this guy, Bush had been all fired up because he was given the speech in Spanish.
And it's true, if you look at this this clip, he's he's in some border town on the US side where ninety per cent ninety per cent of the town speaks Spanish.
But don't worry, that's coming to a state near you soon.
Ninety percent of the town speaks Spanish, so he's giving the speech in Spanish, and it is in fact amazing that he gives a far more animated performance in Spanish than he does in English.
Now I don't uh claim to understand every nuance, I'm not a Spanish speaker, but you can just tell his body language, his animation is more vibrant in Spanish than when he does that sad sack thing with the hunched shoulders and he's talking in English uh uh about uh common core or whatever.
I mean, a lot of times it is just the language.
It's like um people generally sound ro more romantic when they're uh talking in French, you know, because they go into the full Jacques Chiracon or hitting on the Syrian president's wife movie madame for mid if you don't know understand a word or what he's you can just is if you look at Jeb Bush speaking in Spanish, he's like far more an far more animated about it.
But he's clarified his position that he means Asian anchor babies, Chinese anchor babies, not Mexican anchor babies.
So he doesn't want to repeal the Fourteenth Amendment, you constitutional scholars out there.
He'd just like to shave it back to a kind of thirteen and seven eighths amendment where we just get rid of the Chinese anchor babies.
That's his thing.
Headlines Byron York of the Washington Examiner has uh a piece called Trump on Immigration.
What about the Democrats problems?
He's got three headlines here.
Trump's immigration plan could spell doom for the GOP.
Read a headline on a syndicated column by George Will.
Trump's recklessness threatens GOP, read a headline on a Charles Crauthammer column.
Donald Trump reveals the ugly side of the right.
Read a headline on a piece by the Washington Post Jennifer Rubin.
These are all three conservative columnists.
You don't I'm beginning to get the picture.
You don't really need left wing media bias when the so-called conservative columnists are winning to do this.
Byron York's point is that actually the radical position on immigration here is Hillary Clinton's.
Hillary Clinton is proposing to support the unilateral executive edict giving legal protections who came to the United States illegally as children.
She's also pledged to support Obama's court challenged unilateral executive edict.
In other words, this is the one that judges, the same kind of judges who've legalized gay marriage and that Democrats are hot for.
The judges have said that Obama's executive action, giving legal protection to the parents of these now no longer illegal children, she said she'll do that too.
Okay, so it's not just the children now who've been legalized, but she's also said she's gonna support she supports uh Obama's action legalizing their parents too, even though judges have said it's not legal.
And then she's promised citizenship to all the others.
We can't wait any longer, she said.
We can't wait any longer for a path to full and equal citizen.
Believe me, any legal immigrant And I'd never make that mistake again.
But any legal immigrant knows that waiting longer is actually the definition of the United States legal immigration service, not the INS.
What's it called this week?
BCIS?
Is that what it's called?
I can't remember.
They keep shuffling the letters around to throw you off the track.
So when you uh when you've been waiting ten, twelve, seventeen years uh and you want to know what's happened to your application, uh they've always changed the initials, so you can never find it in the phone book.
Um but it's I think it's BCIS they're calling it this week.
Uh and uh and she said, we can't wait any longer, she said, we can't wait.
Wait and waiting longer is actually the business model of BCIS.
It's chisel, it's the motto.
When you go in there to the beautiful stone building in Washington with the columns and everything, it's actually chiseled in the stone above the front door.
Wait longer.
You know, we go the extra mile for you to make you wait longer.
Um but she's saying, no, no, no, these people who bust into the country illegally we're gonna we're gonna legalize.
We're we're gonna leave.
Why isn't that the radical position?
Because she's incentivizing the next wave.
Why d why doesn't Jennifer Rubin or Charles Crowdhammer or George Will have a why doesn't that strike them as more radical?
Why why why is that?
I mean, I'm not asking I'm not asking uh George Will, Charles Crautham at uh Jennifer Rubin to go uh full blown right wing lunatic.
I'm just asking them to support uh an immigration policy as right wing as, say, Sweden's or France's or Ireland's or New Zealand's.
All the countries that the Democrats think we should be more like.
One reason uh that they're not like us is because they have an entirely different immigration policy.
Where you can't just uh give a baby in a as Rush was talking about last week, you can't just have a baby in news in a New Zealand hospital or an Irish hospital and be a citizen.
America America is the only country in the developed world that does that apart from Canada.
And as I said yesterday, Canada only does it uh because you guys do it.
And it doesn't work uh for America on a scale far beyond uh the way it deforms the Canadian immigration uh immigration pattern.
And and Byron York's right, the radical position here, the one that she should be on the defensive about is Hillary is Hillary Clinton's position.
The only reason she isn't on the defensive is uh because all the stories about Hillary Clinton are just about classified emails, uh and about now the uh the story is that uh friends have suggested she might temporarily suspend her campaign.
Uh this is uh growing national security questions about Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server during her time as Secretary of State, uh drowning out much of her message as a presidential candidate and causing many of her fellow democrats to worry about the future of her campaign.
Is it time for Clinton to put her campaign on a temporary hold on a temporary hold?
This is a story in Rasmussen reports.
We've heard a story that uh her abuse of this system by having uh by having confidential top secret materials on a private server was known to America's ally, so that the British Foreign Secretary wouldn't email Hillary direct.
He would only email Huma Aberdeen and other people who had state.gov email addresses and ask them if they would send it, uh show it to Hillary.
Uh in other words, he didn't want to be he didn't he understood that she had an insecure email address.
So what's the betting that the Russians know and the Chinese know?
If the British know and they don't want to use that email address, then you can assume the Russians and the Chinese know.
We now see that one uh of her emails discussed the security and travel arrangements of Christopher Stevens in 2011, the US ambassador to Libya.
And what do you know?
A year later, Christopher Stevens is dead because somebody knew, somebody knew that Ambassador Stevens would not be at his embassy in Tripoli that night, but would be in Benghazi.
Nobody why isn't that dooming Hillary?
Why why is it that uh that w wanting to talk about observing the laws of this country is somehow puts you beyond the pale.
But getting an ambassador killed while your Secretary of State uh I mean, I don't understand the news values of this country.
This country is the worst most stinking awful dullest newspapers in the English speaking world.
And by that I include the Pakistani papers, which are better written and have a better news sense uh than the American American newspapers.
We've got a shocking revelation here that that the travel movements of the ambassador who was killed a year later are discussed in Hillary's emails that she keeps in some guy's toilet in Colorado.
And she pays no price for that.
She pays no price for that.
You know, about a year and a half ago I was given a speech up in Ottawa.
And uh a couple of days before the speech, the premier of uh the Premier of Alberta had been uh down in Arizona vacationing.
Because if you live in Arizona, you'll know that aside from all the Mexicans living there illegally, you also have Canadians who legally have bought themselves some nice little winter houses there and the subdivisions full of Canadian snowbirds.
She's down there in in uh in Arizona, and the the f her pr one of her predecessors as Premier of Alberta dies, and she uh needs to get back in a hurry for the funeral.
So they hop on a plane, and because she claimed the uh as a business expense, the travel fare of her children, which came to eight thousand dollars Canadian, she had to resign from office for eight thousand for an eight thousand dollar expense.
An eight thousand dollar expense rendered her unfit for office as Premier of Alberta.
She had to resign.
She's gone.
History.
Uh a guy there there's a trial gun up there at the moment, a guy who uh supposedly got a hundred thousand claimed a hundred thousand dollars in in in expenses wasn't entitled to.
Kicked out of the Senate, and he's on trial at the moment, on a criminal trial.
We have a situation so we you've got an eight thousand dollar offender and a hundred thousand dollar offender.
Meanwhile, down here, down here, you've got a Secretary of State uh who has uh who is using a uh some no name server to discuss the travel movements of an ambassador in the most dangerous part of the world, and the ambassador subsequently is dead a year later.
So you can't call him to testify.
You can't call him to testify at all.
He's gone.
He's dead.
And it's not on the front page of the New York Times, and it's not leading ABC News or CBS news or NBC News.
You know, all the time the Democrats talk about uh oh, why can't we bo we be more like Canada?
Why can't we be more like Scandinavia?
Why can't we be more like these other Western countries that are social democratic and all the rest of it?
Because you're too corrupt.
It's not that it's in the end it's not even about left wing or right wing.
You're corrupt.
You're corrupt, and say what you like about those wimpy Scandinavians, but they come by their left wing drivel, honestly.
Here it's just corruption.
It's just filthy, disgusting corruption.
Where why can't uh why won't the New York Times put this email discussing Christopher Stevens' travel arrangements on the front page?
Why won't a why won't NBC News lead with it?
Why won't CBS news lead with it?
It's nothing to do.
Why won't why is it why do even conservative columnist here think you're hateful?
You're a hateful, hateful person because you want to move to the same immigration policy as France and Sweden.
That's what Charles Crowdhammer and George Will and Jennifer Rubin are saying, that you can't even discuss it to suggest that uh uh America could possibly move to the same immigration policy as hateful places like Ireland and Norway.
Oh how th you can't even mention that.
This will doom the GOP.
That's why the Republican Party is useless and the Democrat Party is corrupt.
Mark Stein for Rush will take your call straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for Rush on the EIB network.
Let's go to Chris in Kansas City, Missouri.
Uh Chris, you are live on the Rush Limbaugh show.
Yeah, I am totally good for securing the border, getting these people off our welfare system.
But when you start talking about Donald Trump wants to ship off thirty million people, just start making me think, what is that going to do to our economy when you ship off thirty million people?
What is that going to do to our housing economy?
Is that the reason that Republicans don't want to deport anyone?
Well, look, uh that that's the that's George George George Wills got this argument that if you were to deport whatever it is, uh eleven million, fifteen million, thirty million, uh hundred and twenty-seven million, uh, then the buses that would be required to deport them uh would stretch all the way from here to Papua New Guinea.
Uh and it's easy to make arguments like that.
But uh after 911, uh there were some uh Pakistani New Yorkers living in New York ill uh illegally, and a couple of them came up on the radar of the Ion INS because after i uh for about a week after 911, because there was a big smoking crater in the middle of New York, uh the immigration bureaucracy took immigration seriously.
So they went and rounded up uh three, four, five, seven, a dozen Pakistanis in New York who'd come to their attention because they'd been uh in email chains with the guys who pulled off nine eleven.
And I happen to be uh heading to Montreal uh uh about a week later, and at the border crossing on I eighty seven uh uh uh at the New York State Quebec border, there's this like big big line of people, and I say to the guy, what is that?
He goes, they're Pakistanis from New York who, because a dozen were were rounded up, thousands of them then voluntarily left.
The idea that you're gonna need to deport ten, fifteen million people is abs is is ridiculous.
And George Will advances it because it's not going to happen.
What would happen once you be w once you began de serious in enforcement of the immigration laws is that people it would be too much trouble for people to stay.
Look at it from your point of view, Chris.
You can't, as an American, you couldn't go anywhere and open a bank account now because they passed this thing called the Fat Cat Act, right?
That's that that was passed in Congress.
You can't go to uh Toronto and open a bank account.
You can't go to Bermuda and open a bank account, you can go to Paris and open a bank account, you can't go to J Geneva and open a bank account, because no bank anywhere on the planet wants to do business with Americans because this Congress passed this thing called the Fat Cat Act that makes it impossible for Americans to have a bank account anywhere around the world.
Uh they they so the same government that can make it impossible that can apply enough pressure on a bank in Tokyo or a bank in Sydney to say I'm not going to let Chris of Kansas City, Missouri, open a bank account.
That that same government then turns around and says, but we can't do anything to stop Jose, who's in America illegally opening a a bank account at the branch of the first bank of Kansas City, Missouri.
Don't don't you understand that the this is incompatible?
Either the the big security state that George Will says is necessary um is already here.
The difference is it's being used to to make your life hell if you try to fly from Kansas City to Chicago.
It's being used to make your life hell if you happen to buy a uh beach place in the Turks and Caicos and want to open a bank account in Grand Turk.
But but the big security state, it's it's reading every single email uh and telephone call.
It knows every single telephone call you've placed, every email you've made.
Uh but apparently uh but but but apparently uh Donald Trump's scheme to stop wire transfers back to Mexico is impossible.
The big government state already exists, it's just turned on you and legal people in the country legally rather than those who are here illegally, Chris.
Well, thank you.
I think I think that was a satisfied customer.
I hope so.
Listen, this business about collapsing the economy.
Uh there's what is it now?
It's up to ninety-seven people, million people out of the workforce.
We have the lowest workforce participation in American history.
In part because illegal immigration on this scale, to the point where 8% of the babies born in the country are illegal, you imagine the 13% of California school children who are the children of illegals, you imagine what the wages are here.
They're miserable.
They're flatlined.
I said yesterday, if you're born in the bottom 20% in this country, now your chance chances are you're stuck there because wages are depressed because the country's full of people willing to do those jobs illegally's anchor man is away and this is your uh official Fourteenth Amendment certified EIB anchor baby sitting in while Rush uh takes a day off.
Rush will be back tomorrow for authentic full strength all American excellence in broadcasting uh through the end of the week.
So don't miss that.
I've been talking uh and I should perhaps uh clarify this.
I've been talking about the general uselessness of the Republican Party uh for much of the day and I mean in Washington things are things are different according to which part of the country you're in at the state level but uh uh occasionally even in relatively unfavorable electoral circumstances Republicans can get uh things done.
And if you're one of those parents or you're one of those students who's just starting at an American college or university and you're figuring out uh what you're gonna do about uh six figure college debt and all the rest of it, this story of what's happened in Washington State uh will be of interest to you.
State Senator Andy Hill from Washington State is on the line.
Uh and you actually won one for the good guys, Andy.
Good to have you with us.
Oh thank you Mark.
Yeah, we had a big victory, a historic victory in Washington State by lowering tuition for the first time in the state's history.
Because as far as most people know, it's just supposed to go up, up, up, far more than the rate of inflation.
And you'd actually had a situation where it had doubled in...
In uh the years from 2002 to 2012.
So in what people think of as the difference between yesterday and today and in a period of relatively low inflation where houses and salaries haven't doubled, but mysteriously tuition at Washington state colleges and universities somehow managed to double.
Well and interestingly enough we were under single party rule um during that entire time in the state uh Washington kinda kinda tends to be a blue state and um you know it was really nothing nothing uh less than a hidden tax on the middle class.
Uh what what the Democrats did was uh they would uh cost shift the Constitution off to parents and families and students and spend that money otherwise on um uh on their programs and and rewarding their special interests.
Right.
And they have in the big education uh bureaucracy they they have a lot of uh that that's that's one of the loyalist of Democrat uh voting blocks.
Now you you said that your state is a blue state and nobody's suggesting that there's been some kind of uh conservative revolution uh in the state of Oregon.
You don't hold the governorship, you don't hold the House, and you don't hold...
And you barely kind of control the Senate.
Is that correct, Andy?
That's correct.
About about three years ago we uh we took over a twenty five twenty-four majority in the Senate with the help of two uh fiscally conservative Democrats.
Uh now we have a twenty six twenty-three uh advantage uh with one of those Democrats with us.
So we we just we barely control one third of the uh uh of the the legislative process and yet we're able to uh you know kind of turn back the tide of the of a democratically controlled house that just wanted to raise taxes and pay off special interests uh and a democratic governor who was um you know really he had a an extreme green agenda at the at the expense of of literally everything else.
And and just just to to explain the way thing things work here in in Washington a couple of fiscally conservative Democrats who were willing to work with you on this and then made it happen.
That's right.
That's all you needed.
That's all it took.
That's right.
And we actually have an outright Republican majority right now in the Senate.
And that's um you know two years ago when we took over we managed to freeze tuition for the first time in a generation against the Democrats' wishes.
And then uh two years later in 2015 we were able to cut tuition up to twenty percent at our uh colleges and universities.
Yeah and that's actually that that's that's actually a four-figure sum that uh that that that parents and students are saving uh it's like it's real money that they're not having to pay.
It's a quarter billion dollar uh tax relief to the middle class it it's and it's it's wildly popular more popular than I think we would have ever expected um with families and with students.
Yeah because b because it's not really a left wing right wing thing if you if you've got students that you're sending to universities you benefit from that regardless of what your ideology is.
It's a it's a classic in that case it's a i it's a it's the sort of classic issue uh that has no downside for you from that from that point of view.
No and and it also helps you know we have students in Washington State graduating with an average of twenty five thousand dollars of debt so it also helps them get their uh you know get their feet on the ground and get their careers launched and uh and making them great citizens and great taxpayers.
And and but y but you've done it across the board because I think uh at uh at the maximum it's 20 percent but all the way even at like the community college level which is the kind of bargain in economic terms but you even managed to cut that by five percent.
We did we did we wanted to we you know we wanted to capture as large a swath of s of of relief as possible.
And we, you know, when we looked at the numbers, we figured this is the best way to deliver the most value to the most people.
Now, just just to be clear what we're talking about here, because, again, the problem with Washington is that when they talk about cuts, they actually mean cuts in the in the rate of increase.
What you're what you're doing here now is is actually reducing it in hard dollar terms for people for people who are who are going to start college this year.
In other words, it's real money.
It's not just some abstract exercise like Washington accounting.
But no, if you were in college last year.
year and you go to college this year you're gonna be paying it somewhere like the University of Washington when this is fully implemented you'll be paying about two thousand dollars a year less.
That's what those are real dollars.
Right, right.
And which is which is what a cut is supposed to be that's right and and just you you said you the average student leaves with that $25,000 in debt.
Just to connect the things we've been talking about this morning Americans now have about 1.3 trillion dollars in in private college debt uh which is about the equivalent of the uh GDP of Mexico.
I mean it's a hu it's a huge amount.
It's actually just when you think uh your kids are grown up and they're ready to go out into the world suddenly you have these huge amounts of money uh that either the parents or the children have to find something to do with otherwise they can't they're ineligible for middle class employment uh effectively aren't they Andy you can't buy a home you can't start your own business if you've got this this anchor hanging around your neck.
Yeah yeah and and you say it's been popular with with both uh Democrats and Republicans the i in in terms of your electorate the electorate is is elated over it it's it is wildly popular when we froze tuition two years ago we really didn't um we were surprised at the response there from the electorate now again not as not as popular with the governor and the Democratic lawmakers but with the broad electorate it is just wildly popular and it shouldn't be a surprise.
I mean, they have, you know, they've had this tax kind of forced down their throat over the last 10 years.
And it's rare that you see real tax relief.
Now, do you think you can use this not to be all because we're talking about the nobility of education, everything?
But do you think you could actually use this to grubby partisan advantage in the sense that it's clear that Democrats in your house and in the governor's office are essentially prioritizing their interest groups over the interest of their electorate?
Do you think you can persuade a significant chunk of the electorate to reward you for?
actually putting two thousand dollars in their pocket Well, I you know, I I I think so.
I think it it definitely helps the brand.
Um it shows that we're results driven.
We're not talking about it, we're not giving it lip service.
You know, we actually have the leadership to go through um and govern responsibly and govern with uh you know with with the people in mind instead of uh instead of politics and special interests.
Well, that's uh that's good n that's that's good news.
Thanks for uh telling this uh telling us about this, Andy.
Rush mentioned this uh last week uh and Rush cited it as an example of of what can be done, and as you explained, you now do have a majority in the Senate, but basically at the time you began trying to do this, it was basically uh you had half the Senate and you picked up a couple of uh Democrats who you persuaded see it your way and you accomplished something, Andy.
And that is a rare inspirational story at this time when we're told far too often that nothing can be done.
So thanks for taking the time to uh to talk with us about it today.
That was my pleasure, Mark, and you know the key was we all stuck together and we all kept a rhyme on the prize.
So you greet people here in Washington State.
Yeah, that's uh that's good.
Thanks.
Thanks a lot, Addie.
That's State Senator Andy Hill from the uh Washington State Senate, uh where they where they actually cut something uh and they and it was of huge benefit uh to the voters of that state, regardless of whether you're Democrat or Republican, as he was just explaining, you've between last year's college bill and this year's college bill, you're two thousand dollars better off.
This thing that had rampaged out of control all of this century, doubling in the years between two thousand and two, two thousand and twelve, you've now got uh twenty percent cuts at regional colleges, fifteen percent cut at the Washing University of Washington and Washington State University, all the way down to five percent cuts even at community college.
So actually, fiscal conservatism, a rare victory, and the people who benefit are not the special interest groups, but the citizens.
Mark Stein, Infor Rush, we'll take more of your calls straight ahead.
Mark Stein Infra Rush on the EIB network.
What what are we?
We're like an hour and uh just like halfway through the show.
I got nothing to talk about, because yesterday you recall uh I I made uh I made some uh mildly dismissive remark about Rick Wilson, this member of the Republican Consultant Industrial uh Complex.
There was there was him and there was who is it, Charlie Black, who worked on the uh McCain Romney campaign, um uh McCain and Romney campaigns.
These guys, they go from one terrific uh campaign to another campaign.
And I made a mild uh uh you know, a mild crack.
Do these guys all live in some bizarro alternative universe at the foot of some alternative Mount Rushmore uh where all their winning candidates are uh are lined up, uh McCain, Romney, Bob Dole, uh Wendell Wilkie, Thomas Dewey.
And uh and and Rick Wilson, you you uh I'm willing to tweet me, tweet me Rush's home number, and I'll call you direct and we can thrash this out man to man, you little punk ass foreigner.
Uh how dare you do this?
And uh yeah, I we said obviously we're not gonna tweet Rush's home number.
Uh that would be out an outrageous breach of security.
It would be like uh it would be like the Russians getting hold of Hillary Clinton's fax machine in a toilet in Colorado.
Um so uh we reached out, our head of uh GOP Consultant Industrial Complex Outreach, uh DM'd uh Rick Wilson to say, send us a phone, you want to come on the show, you because he's been doing this that gutlas pansy, that little fairy boy girly pan Stein doesn't have he doesn't have the guts to take me on.
Uh so he's been doing all this stuff, and uh we said uh g send us an email number or a phone number where we can get hold of you.
And instead he just he's just been tweeting, oh, I'm in a meeting.
The meeting's overrunning a bit.
He's having a meeting uh to discuss their the winning ad by they're doing for the Lindsey Graham campaign.
Uh they're uh they're spending uh two hundred million dollars on advertising in select swing counties in Iowa, and he's tied up in that meeting, so he can't come out and talk to talk to me now.
Uh but Rick Wilson, if you're listening, uh we've asked you, we've DM'd you as the as the hipsters say, uh if you could send us if you could s if you could send us a phone number, if you could send us an email address, if you could send us the number of your nineteen seventy-eight fax machine in the basement, we will get back to you and you can come and we can thrash it out, man to man.
And otherwise, if you don't want to do that, uh if you want to if you want to I'll send you the fare for a greyhound bus ticket, and I'll meet you at an interstate rest area on I-91, and uh we can we we we can have pistols at dawn then if you want to do it that way too.
But I got nothing to talk about now.
Uh so I tell you what, I might as well uh plug my uh book uh for a minute or so, because um uh President Obama is going and giving a speech on climate change in Vegas.
He came back from Martha's Vineyard, right?
And immediately he goes, the the markets are collapsing.
The uh New York, London, Shanghai, down, down, down, and he decides that's the perfect day to give a uh uh uh uh a speech on climate change.
And I've written a new book, it's called A Disgrace to the Profession.
It's not about what other uh GOP consultants think of Rick Wilson.
Don't worry, it's not about that.
A disgrace to the profession is the story of the most famous uh science graph of the twenty-first century, the global warming hockey stick, and the shenanigans that were required to waft it upwards, it was in Al Gore's movie, it was uh taught in schools around the world, uh, and it is scientifically speaking complete rubbish.
And yet when uh Obama stands up in public in as he did in Vegas and says the science is settled, there's no argument, when John Kerry says uh only you flat earthers are disagreeing with that, that's not true.
In fact, there are thousands of scientists who think that the cartoon climatology of global warming is complete nonsense.
Uh there in my book, it's called a disgrace to the profession.
It comes out in a few days' time, and uh I'm gonna be uh I'm gonna be working the plug circuit uh fairly seriously when it does come out.
But it's uh it's available for pre-order at Amazon, and it is cracking stuff if I do say so myself, because you think if you think a lot of this science stuff is going to be too complicated to wrap your head around, and lay people won't be able to understand it.
In fact, this science, the global warming science, a lot of it is so thin that it actually literally relies on one or two trees uh purporting to tell you the temperature of the entire planet.
That is how insanely stupid it is.
Nobody believes that.
No serious person uh who looks at this science believes it.
So if you ever wanted to have all the facts in a nice digestible form about what is wrong with this cartoon global warming science, uh then my little my little contribution, uh it's called a disgrace to the profession, and it is uh available now for pre-order in uh e-book form,
your Kindles and your Nooks and your whatnots, as well as in old-fashioned print form, where we've destroyed so many trees to print all the all the books that people will be want about that there will not be enough tree rings left to divine the temperature in the year 700.
So we we've we think this is like the the handiest, neatest way to get all the facts about global warming in one form.
It's called a disgrace of the profession.
As I said, I got nothing to say now.
It's uh I'm waiting for Rick Wilson.
He's promised me he's in a meeting because Strom Thurmond apparently is thinking of throwing his hat in the ring, and uh he's thinking of working on Strom's campaign uh for president, and so he's in a big meeting.
But as soon as he's out of the meeting, we're gonna try and get him back on the air.
Mark Stein in for Rush, more straight ahead.
Mark Stein in for Rush.
You you may have heard about this Ashley Madison thing.
Uh no relation to James Madison, I don't think.
Uh I don't think she Ashley Madison is his or is James Madison's great great-great-great-great-great-granddaughter or whatever, although that is actually the history of the Republic in a nutshell, from founding father to porno site.
Um but Ashley Madison, you've Josh Duggar was named, and uh apparently some of the big time jihadists were also availing themselves of the services of Ashley Madison, so these devout Muslims aren't above getting it on with uh the infant filthy infidel whores if the uh if the price is right and the arrangements can be made.
But uh there's a piece here by Ruth Bargolis, why are we denying that women used Ashley Madison?
And it's it's basically objecting on feminist grounds that we're just making a fuss about the men like the jihadists and Josh Duggar, who all signed up with Ashley Madison, but all the women looking for a good time who signed up with Ashley Madison are being protected,
▲
Export Selection