All Episodes
Previous Next
June 9, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:27
June 9, 2015, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, Rush is taking a few well-earned days off, and it is the season of guest hosts.
But don't be worried, don't be alarmed, we got guest host Segogo, Buck Sexton here tomorrow, and a glittering array beyond him, Eric Erickson, Roger Hedgecock, and then Rush returns for full strength, excellence in broadcasting live next Monday.
I was talking, I was comparing Hillary Clinton and Marco Rubio in the previous hour.
This bizarre thing, this Rubio and his wife have a combined 17 traffic tickets from the last two decades.
She stacked up 13 of them.
He got four.
But I love the way the Times, this wife, this spouse of Marco Rubio's isn't a person in her own right.
Not just that she's a chattel, but her traffic tickets are just chattels too.
And there's some Florida community property law whereby if your wife stacks up speeding tickets, that's yours too.
And somebody said this on the internet, and I can't find who it was, but it's like a really brilliant line.
It goes, Hillary Clinton and her husband have sexually assaulted numerous women.
That's true.
Hillary Clinton and her husband collectively have made numerous flights on the Lolita Express with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Huma Aberden, let's not forget Hillary's gal Friday.
Huma Aberdin and her husband have collectively tweeted numerous pictures of their private parts across the country and round the planet.
We can all go, if we're going to hang, if the New York Times wants to hang Marco Rubio's wife, I don't even know her name.
I don't know.
I have no idea who she is.
Never heard of her.
But apparently, Marco Rubio's wife's traffic tickets.
It's like this is like the Sarah Palin thing all over again.
Sarah Palin's daughter's boyfriend's cousin's babysitter has got some meth conviction from 1997.
So that's why Sarah Palin shouldn't be president.
And it's exactly, they're doing the same thing now.
Hillary Clinton's husband is flying around with a pedophile.
Convicted paedophile.
The British papers are all over this because His Royal Highness the Duke of York, who happens to be the Prince of Wales' younger brother, so he's whatever it is now, one, two, three, four, fifth in line to the throne, sixth, seventh, I forget what it is.
Don't know how many children the lovely Duchess of Cambridge has had now, two.
He's seventh in line to the throne or something.
And he happened to be at some party with this guy, and the Daily Mail and the British papers have been all over it with this guy, with, you know, how disgusting it is that the guy who's seventh in line to the throne is consorting with this convicted paedophile and going to his parties on Pedote Island with all this jailbait.
Bill Clinton, Bill Clinton, is the former president.
He's not seventh in line to the throne.
He's going to be the equivalent of the Queen Consort when he's in the White House.
He's the first, going to be the first lady.
And nobody knows that, but apparently Marco Rubio's wife's traffic ticket.
The New York Times is only kept afloat by this Mexican billionaire, Carlos Slim.
And it's essentially now basically serves his political needs.
That's all that paper exists for.
Otherwise, it would be going out of business because that family is so ruined.
The whatever they're called, the Saltz, what were they called?
Salzbergers, whatever they are, have so ruined that newspaper.
But this is pathetic even by their standards, to be doing that.
Here's a letter from the New York Times, by the way.
This is from Hannah McShay of Durham, North Carolina, but she's a student at Harvard.
Harvard is this big, fancy university in Massachusetts.
So we're not talking community college here.
This is like the best of the best.
This is like her parents, a big financial sacrifice, huge student loans, very had to work this kid hard to get her to Harvard and to have a privileged education.
So she's writing about all this safe space and the way American universities have totally deformed and debased that word and they've now become safe spaces where the First Amendment doesn't run and where only approved ideas are allowed.
And she goes to the editor, yes, we are militant about justice.
But the justice we seek in an act looks like healing, reparation, and care.
We do have demands, but not that you submit to our etiquette, rather that you join a culture of compassion and acknowledge vulnerability.
College students are volatile.
And if our safe spaces seem more for hiding from ideas than for shelter from oppression, it is because we occasionally confound structural injustice, which hurts badly, with being in the world, which also hurts.
This is what a Harvard education buys you.
The safe space.
Anytime anyone uses the word safe space, you should laugh at them and throw it back in their face.
Because safe space is a fluffy bunny word for totalitarianism.
That's what it is, the safe space.
North Korea is a safe space, as far as Kim Jong-un sees it.
Because nothing, it's exactly like an American university campus.
Only the approved ideologies are let in.
And that's and any ideology, any ideas that don't fit in are kept out.
And that's what North Korea has in common with an American university campus.
A lady called Rachel Martin, who's a host on NPR, and she interviewed this Northwestern professor, Laura Kipnis, who was essentially investigated under Title IX for something she said.
Title IX, which insofar as anybody knows anything about it, was some law that we thought was intended to make sure women weren't denied the opportunity to be on the college wrestling team and that kind of thing.
Al Gore was keen on it.
In the 2000 election campaign, he was taking a riverboat cruise.
Don't worry, he didn't buy an $80,000 speedboat like Marco Rubio, shameful man.
This was entirely some other kind of boat.
And he was going down the river and there were some people on the bank that he thought were for some women's sports team.
And he shouted out, How do you like that Title IX at them with that deft campaigning touch that Al Gore is renowned for?
And they stared at him blankly because they hadn't heard of Title IX.
But that's what it was.
As recently as 2000, people thought it was something to do with making sure that girls had spots on the wrestling team or whatever.
And now it's become something that is being used in the name of gender equality, is being used to shut down speech that ruffles the safe space.
The safe space is a totalitarian concept.
And Republicans ought to get serious about this kind of stuff because by the time these kids take the six or seven years to finish their bachelor's degrees and come out at the age of 27, 28, 33, 34, however old Sandra Fluke was by the time she'd finished school, the idea that they can be marinated in this for two decades and then go and suddenly pull the lever for a Republican candidate or support conservative ideas is absolutely ridiculous.
The safe space is a fluffy expression for totalitarianism.
Hitler, if Hitler had any sense, he would have changed the name of the Third Reich to the Third Safe Space, and people wouldn't have bothered him.
And likewise, Stalin, if instead of calling it the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, he'd called it the Union of Safe Space Republics, USSR.
He wouldn't have to change any of the acronym or anything like that.
People would have left him alone.
If Mao had called Communist China the people's safe space of China, they would have had no problems.
It's what a safe space is: a one-party state.
So that is exactly what it is like at American college campuses right now, where if you want to shut down a speaker, all you have to say is, oh, they're making you feel vulnerable.
They're causing you a trigger warning.
Coming and talking perhaps about a fair tax is a microaggression that's reminding you of your vulnerability as a woman who once invented a fake rape story and got on the front page of Rolling Stone.
So the safe space is a totalitarian concept.
The biggest safe space on the planet right now is the Muslim world.
That's one huge safe space.
The Arab world, the parts of it, Malaysia, Indonesia, you still have a bit of free speech and all the rest of it.
But the Arab world is a big safe space monolith where nothing that doesn't fit ideologically gets in.
The United Nations did a survey a few years ago and they discovered that more books are translated into Spanish.
Speaking of Rush Revere, because Rush Revere's Spanish edition is published today, and people are probably wondering, well, why is Rush Revere being translated in Spanish?
Because more books, as the UN said, more books are translated into Spanish in a single year than have been translated into Arabic in the last thousand years.
And when you have a safe space that's as safe as that, what it does is basically it shuts you down, closes you off.
You become a moribund culture.
You become a non-innovative, non-dynamic culture.
And when you read the letters of Hannah McShea in the New York Times, when you listen to Rachel Martin on NPR saying there's a war of ideas, she's writing about this use of Title IX to shut down Laura Kipnis.
And she says there's a war of ideas happening on college campuses these days.
No, there isn't.
There ought to be a war of ideas happening on college campuses, but there's nowhere with less ideas, nowhere with fewer ideas anywhere in the Western world than an American college campus.
There's a war on ideas happening on college campuses these days, where people are actively waging war on free speech.
And then they come out of these places and they're in the real world.
And you think the real world's going to hit them like a cold gust of wind.
And suddenly they'll have to realize that there are people with different opinions on gay marriage, different opinions on transgendered bathrooms, different opinions on climate change.
And that they're going to have to adjust to that.
But no, they don't adjust to that because they've been raised in the safe space.
So their reaction is when someone has a different view on climate change and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse says, let's use RICO racketeering laws against people who are climate change deniers, they think that's good because those climate change deniers are violating the safe space.
When Clint Eastwood makes a joke about Caitlin Jenner on the Blokes channel, on the Guy channel, on the man channel, even the men, the metrosexual eunuchs who emerge from the safe space say, oh no, Clint, Clint made a joke about Caitlin Jenner.
That might be a microaggression to people.
We'll have to cut that out of the broadcast.
So we can't have that.
If you're wondering why free speech is on the rocks in the United States and around the free world, it's by letting our children be held hostage in the safe space for the first 20 years of their life.
And it's the safe space is where cultures go to die.
The safe space is why the Arab world is culturally, intellectually, argumentatively dead.
And it's why American campuses are dead too.
Mark Sneinin for Rush, 1-800-282-2882.
Live on Eyewitness News in Florida right now, direct from the pier, Marco Rubio's wife is double parked and blocking the Oppo research guys who are staking out her speedboat.
So if she hears this, could you move the car?
Because they're anxious to pull out of the parking lot and start following you down the street.
By the way, people are probably wondering.
You know, New York Times is shocked, shocked, shocked at the fact that Marco Rubio and his wife have this house debt and they're paying off this thing called a mortgage, right?
You know, you buy a house, but you can't buy it, so you get this thing called a loan from a bank, and they call it a mortgage, and you pay it off over several years, maybe 15, 20, 25 years, whatever.
And they can't understand this because a normal, healthy politician of integrity gets a guy like Tony Rezco to buy a house.
That's what he did for Obama.
Tony Rezco buys the house and he takes the fall and then he goes to jail for 10 and a half years for corruption and fraud.
That's how a healthy, well-adjusted, fiscally responsible politician takes care of buying a house and paying his mortgage.
Let's go to Brian in Orlando, Florida.
Watch out for Mrs. Rubio rear-ending you at 28 miles an hour, Brian.
Great to have you with us on the show.
Thank you for taking my call.
My pleasure.
What's on your mind?
Well, I wanted to comment on something you said in the first hour.
You said that about 73 people in the TSA are on the terrorist watch list.
And I just wanted to direct you to a 2014 article on the Huffington Pussy Post saying seven ways that you could end up on the terrorist watch list.
All you need to do is raise reasonable suspicion.
This can be from a tweet.
This can be on a Facebook post.
This could be by signing a petition.
And when you look at things like on Representatives Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and Peter King are saying, they're saying that even Ted Cruz is a terrorist.
If a Republican is a terrorist, I got to put my hand up.
I'm probably on that list too.
No, it's true.
The terrorist watch list has a million and a half people on it.
And a lot of those people shouldn't be on it because it's badly done and it's incompetently done.
On the other hand, there are people who can't get on it.
The Panty Bomber was supposed to be on the terrorist watch list, but he got on the plane.
And afterwards, Janadin Competano, who was then the Homeland Security Secretary, Janadin Competano explained that, no, the system worked perfectly because he wasn't on the terrorist watch list.
He was on the kind of waiting list for the terrorist watch list.
It's like when you're at LaGuardia waiting for an upgrade on United or USAIR, but you're not actually on the official terrorist watch list.
I don't doubt that there are all kinds of people on the territory.
Steve Hayes, who's a commenter on Fox News.
And Steve Hayes writes a lot about terrorism.
And so that means he goes to places like Turkey, which is the same place that people who want to sign up and fight for ISIS, they generally fly to Turkey and slip over the Syria-Iraq border from the Turkish side.
So because he went to Turkey, he wound up on the do not fly, the no-fly list.
And that's completely ridiculous.
And that only confirms the point, though, of the incompetence, the staggering incompetence.
The United States has more agencies, Brian.
It's not even a partisan thing.
Everybody should be able to agree on this.
The United States' answer to any problem is always to create a new acronym and toss it in the great wasteful alphabet soup of the federal government.
So they have more agencies doing more of the same things, keeping more lists.
And for the usual, what do they call it here, KMA or CYA?
What is it?
CYA, I think.
Cover your posterior.
For those reasons, it's better to put more people on the list.
So if Nancy Pelosi sends a tweet out to some guy in Turkey, let's stick her on the list.
And so you're right there, that there's people who are there on that list who shouldn't be on that list.
But on the other hand, the Inspector General, I believe, examined these names.
What the actual report is, these are just the things they've released to the public.
The actual report is apparently more devastating, that it is actually quite serious people with terrorist links, not just Steve Hayes and Nancy Pelosi and other suspicious people, but people with serious links to terrorism who are working in American airports.
And that's bedrock.
That's bedrock security, Brian.
Because if nothing else can be done after 9-11, you know, we accept that there are peripheral things, that they may not get to the ferry terminals.
They may not get to all the obscure little travel Canadian land crossings.
But 9-11 was an airplane attack, an airplane attack.
And everyone's seen these thrillers where it's the guy who's working at the Burger King at gate 27 who slips into the bathroom and prepares the bomb there.
If they can't do that, they can't get those guys.
They can't get anything.
Oh, yeah.
Great to be with you.
You're not sure where to get your dad for Father's Day, which is coming up in about a week and a half.
Why not give him a subscription to the Limbaugh Letter?
It's a great gift.
It includes not just Rush's own thoughts on the global scene, but also interviews with top conservatives like Ben Carson and Scott Walker and even me.
I've been in there a couple of times sharing my thoughts with Rush.
Last time we did it was an absolutely cracking interview.
So if you really want to get your dad a great Father's Day gift, take out a subscription and buy a back copy of, I think it was October 2014.
That was the last time I was in there.
But that's, I like to think at any rate, that's a particularly good issue.
But it's great every month.
And if you subscribe for your dad for a great Father's Day gift, you can now get an extra issue free.
If you subscribe right now, this isn't going to be around for 4th of July or for Labor Day.
It's just a Father's Day offer.
You can get an extra issue free, and you can get two bonus commentaries from Rush, including Rush on the truth about American exceptionalism.
And in this month's issue, in the June one, Rush has a terrific commentary: a celebration of the American Mail, the last bastion of American toughness.
I love that.
The word bastion.
Bastion is a tough word.
I mean, what's tougher?
Bastion or safe space.
And as Rush says, the American Mail, the last bastion of American toughness, before it all crumples away into one strange blanc, jelly wobbling safe space until the Muller's nucus.
But that's maybe a glum thought for Father's Day.
But do your dad a favor, get him a subscription to the Limbaugh letter.
Get those free bonus commentaries by going to rushlimbaugh.com.
While you're there, do him a make it a real Father's Day to remember and get out a subscription to Rush24-7.
He'll thank you for it.
And while I'm plugging, I'm still getting mail saying, after yesterday's show, saying, Stein, you were talking about this book about climate change that you're in.
What's that book called?
Well, to keep it simple, because when people say, what's the name of that climate change book?
We thought we'd keep it simple, and it's called Climate Change.
It's actually called Climate Change Colon the Facts because it's the facts about climate change.
That's how simple we wanted to keep it.
But I'm still getting a ton of emails from people saying, I heard you talking about this book about climate change that you're a co-author of.
What's it called?
Well, the book on climate change is called Climate Change.
That's what keeping it simple.
The book is called Climate Change.
When we open on Broadway, it'll be called Climate Change the Musical.
And when we do the movie version, it will be Climate Change, the Motion Picture, adapted from Climate Change, the Musical, adapted from Climate Change, the Facts, the book.
And Mr. Snurdley is asking whether it is available out Abbazon.
It is available at Abbazon.
I'm happy to say that it keeps selling out at Abazon.
It was number one on the climatology hit parade.
I didn't even know there was a climatology hit parade.
But yeah, they allowed the book to be sold on Abazon.
It's not like these little bobbin pop bookstores in Fabod, which are like safe spaces too.
You go into a little bobbin pop bookstore in Fabod, and it's got, you know, interesting books that you already agree with, but nothing that's going to disturb you from the safe space.
This is a book for people who want to bust out of the safe space.
This is a book for people who want to nuke the safe space.
This is for people who say, free people, free peoples do not live in a safe space.
Free peoples want to live in the rough and tumble of free society.
They don't want to live in the totalitarian, one-party state of the safe space, no matter how much fluffy, inclusive, compassionate, vulnerable students like Hannah McShea writing in the New York Times take up all the nice, safe-sounding words like compassion and vulnerability.
The safe space is totalitarian.
Climate change, the facts, is for people who don't want to live in the safe space.
And I don't need to.
Mr. Serdley asks whether I need to pay protesters.
I don't need to pay protesters.
I've got, like, the last time I spoke in Copenhagen, a one-legged Chechen, they're always the most dangerous kind, by the way.
A one-legged Chechen, he strapped on his bomb and came.
I was being interviewed by the Mohammed cartoon guys, and the one-legged Chechen decided it would be a great time to take us all out.
And he started, he put his bomb on and started hopping across the hotel room and prematurely self-detonated.
I mean, it's just, don't you hate it when that happens?
I think they've got a pill for it now.
But so I don't have to pay protesters, Mr. Serdley, but it is climate change, the facts is available, is available at Amazon and all other good outlets.
And you can get it in Kindle or Nook.
Or if you're listening in Canada, you can get it in Kobo because that's the big, that's the sort of Kindle of Canada.
You can get it in Kobo and be reading it within 90 seconds.
That's how easy it is.
So we call it, we're trying to say, so people saying, what's that book on climate change that marks Seinspower?
We thought we'd call it Climate Change and make it easy to remember.
But it's important, this stuff.
We are witnessing a war on free speech.
And I mentioned, I touched on this yesterday, that they're now using other laws.
One of the problems with federal lawmaking in particular, it's not the same at the state level, county, municipal, but federal law may federal laws in this country are really badly written.
Obamacare is just like the most bloated example of this, but they're all badly written.
And they all metastasize like a cancer.
So they spread to all kinds of things.
So this poor woman at Northwestern University, for an essay, they file suit under Title IX.
Title IX, which is supposed to be about having lady sumo wrestlers at American colleges, suddenly becomes a way to shut down the First Amendment, an end run around the First Amendment.
We've got a new thing now, a gag order under something called the Unified Agenda of Regulatory Objectives from the State Department on under International Traffic in Arms Regulations, ITAR, International Traffic in Arms Regulations, is basically a gag order that could shut down any discussion of guns on the internet, any technical discussion of guns on the internet.
If you own a gun, you know that there's all these firearms websites where people like to talk about the technical specifics of this gun versus that gun, that gun versus this gun.
And under something that nobody's ever heard of, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations and the unified agenda of regulatory objectives, which all by itself sounds like a Soviet term, it will apparently now be illegal for All these fora on the internet, all these websites, all these blogs to have little discussions back and forth on do you like that gun?
Do you like this gun?
What do you think of this?
What do you think of that?
They're all apparently illegal, and the Department of Justice will be able to prosecute you for taking part in a gun conversation on the internet.
And the people who aren't worried about this kind of stuff say, Oh, you don't have to worry about that.
Yes, technically they could, but come on, the Department of Justice isn't going to prosecute people for making comments on websites and that kind of things.
The Department of Justice is actually prosecuting people commenting right now over at Reason, the libertarian magazine, at their site reason.com.
The Department of Justice has got a grand jury subpoena for them to cough up the names of their commenters who express disapproval of a judge's ruling in this Silk Road drug case where some kid has wound up going to prison.
He's not kid, he's 28 or whatever, but he's going to prison without parole for the rest of his life.
People commenting on this judge, and the Department of Justice has now got a subpoena ordering reason.com to cough up the identifying information about its commenters.
So now they've got a provision in some federal regulation nobody's ever heard of that allows them to go after people who talk about gun specifications on the internet.
And it'll be one of these laws.
Maybe they won't get you for that, but when they need to get you for something, it'll be one more of those federal laws that they can get you on, such as Denny Hastett, who's being, as I said yesterday, is being arraigned today in Chicago for withdrawing his own money perfectly legally from his own bank account, perfectly legally, to give to some other guy perfectly legally.
But they've used this structuring law, again, one of those laws that can mean anything, one of these great elastic federal laws that they can use selectively to get you when they need to get you.
And that's what they're doing with the commenters on reason.com, and that's what they're doing with this new gag order on firearm-related speech, which is a new interpretation of a new regulation somewhere in the vast federal bureaucracy.
And where do you go?
I say it's a law, it's a new law.
It's not a law in the sense that it's been passed by legislators in a legislature.
That's what old laws used to be.
That's how it used to be in the old days: that legislatures would gather in a legislature and they would pass a law.
And if you didn't like the law, you could go to your polling booth a year or two later and vote that legislator out.
You don't know who came.
Nobody knows who came up with it.
No legislature voted to make it illegal to discuss guns on the internet.
That's just somebody in sub-basement level five of some department, of some agency, of a bureau, of a department, of a whatever, somewhere in the vast sucking more of the federal bureaucracy.
And there's nowhere you can go.
There's no polling booth in America that you can go to to vote that guy out.
Yet he just made a law that will allow the Department of Justice to prosecute you for talking about guns on the internet.
Mark Stein, Infra Rush, these are all threats to free speech.
We'll talk about that and a lot more straight ahead.
Mike Huckabee has called for the United States government to hack China back.
You know that the Chinese are the ones who are suspected of busting in and stealing four million records of federal workers, which is the sort of thing that could be very useful to a hostile power.
And Mike Huckabee is saying the responsible thing to do when a cyber attack is an act of war.
And when you have one of those, you should respond in kind, and we should hack China back.
I don't think we're good enough to hack China back.
Just yesterday, the U.S. Army's official website, whatever it is, Army.mil, the public website, was hacked by some social media wing of ISIS.
And everyone said, oh, don't worry about it.
Don't worry about it.
It's just the public website.
They didn't get anything classified.
Look, a bunch of rinky-dink head choppers in the middle of the desert have managed to hack into the U.S. Army's official website.
And if you don't think that has an impact in the world, then you're not living in the real world.
You have to be able to do this stuff back.
China is better at the hacking than we are.
Russians are better at the hacking than we are.
And as I said, no-account branch offices of ISIS in busted, completely failed, imploded states in the middle of nowhere are better at this hacking stuff than we are.
Let's go to Tony in Richmond, Virginia.
Tony, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
Great to have you with us.
Mark, it's great to connect to IStation EIB.
I was listening intently to the infractions of Marco Rubio and noted that Hillary Clinton does not have a single parking ticket.
That's important.
At least it shows that Marco Rubio and his wife know how to drive a car and have done so within the last 30 years.
I don't think Hillary can be accused of that.
She's been driven everywhere her entire life.
And with regards to Marco Rubio's $80,000 boat, I'll bet you Hillary Clinton spent more than $80,000 on the half and half for the coffee for her little get-togethers every year since she's been in her, whatever you want to call it, her little kingdom.
And also, I wanted to make an offer to everyone out there that I today have a sale, $350,000.
I will give a speech on the green apple trots to anyone that's willing to pay.
$350,000.
Yep.
Okay, okay, Tony.
That's bargain.
You can't get Chelsea Clinton on African diarrhea for $350,000.
That's certainly the case.
Tony makes a good point there.
But the New York Times, you see, they think now, this is how depraved the political class has become.
They don't understand why Mrs. Rubio is driving around in her Honda Civic or whatever it is.
The thing about it is that real politicians, they get driven and it's all taken care of.
And they don't have mortgages.
What's the mortgage like?
Chelsea Clinton, for example, managed to buy a condo in New York for over $10 million.
Chelsea Clinton.
I mean, she was the one who said that she went to work at the Clinton Foundation because she realized after a year of working at NBC, I think it was, was it NBC or ABC or CBS?
I don't know.
It could have been any of them.
That she didn't want, she didn't want to be in this money world.
Money wasn't important to her.
And that's why she went to work for the Clinton Foundation.
Because the Clinton Foundation, if money isn't important to you, the Clinton Foundation is a great place to work because they take care of getting all the money for you.
So she didn't have to, mysteriously, the nice little selfless charity worker, Chelsea Clinton, then got this $10.3 million condo in New York.
And the New York Times isn't interested in that.
But the fact that Marco Rubio has a couple of hundred thousand dollars on his mortgage is apparently a scandal, a scandal, scandalous.
He's unfit to be president.
If he doesn't know how to shake down some Saudi prince or some minor Gulf Emir to cough up the money to buy his big $10 million condo in New York, how can he possibly think he's fit to be president?
If he doesn't know how to get a $7 million yacht by marrying some ketchup heiress and park it in an adjoining state to waive half a million dollars worth of it, how can we expect this guy to function as president?
If he doesn't know how to find some big sugar daddy who'll take care of his house and then take the wrap and go to jail for 10 years for fraud and corruption like Tony Rezco did, how can we possibly expect this guy to be fit to be president?
It's disgusting.
It's absolutely disgusting, this Marco Rubio guy driving around and getting a parking ticket once every 10 years.
It's disgusting he should even presume.
Why isn't he being driven around like real presidential candidates?
Get out of this race.
You shame the Republic, Marco Rubio.
More on the Rush Limbaugh show straight after this.
Saudi Arabia has summoned Iran's ambassador after four Saudis vacationing in the northeast Iranian city of Mashhad died from poisoning in some hotel in Mashhad.
It's a revered sacred shrine of Imam Reza.
And four Saudis went there to see it and they died of poisoning.
And the Iranians are saying the poisoning appears to be accidental and due to poor cleaning standards at this Iranian hotel, not because they're enriching uranium in the gift shop in the lobby or anything like that.
But the Saudis aren't taking it lying down and they have summoned the Iranian ambassador.
So this is what it's going to be like.
We can have UN inspectors in Iran and they will die of food poisoning in the hotel.
▲
Export Selection