All Episodes
Previous Next
April 23, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:25
April 23, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I tell you, folks, the Bombay doors remain open, and there are more bombs dropping on the Clintons, even as we speak.
Greetings and welcome back, Rush Lindbaugh at a cutting edge of societal evolution, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882 and the email address L Rushbo at EIBNET.com.
Judicial Watch has just announced that it has received 126 pages of documents from the State Department related to Hillary Clinton's possible conflicts of interest regarding her position as Secretary of State.
The initial Freedom of Information Act request published and placed on May the 2nd, 2011.
Four years ago.
And the documents are being released today.
That's right.
OMG.com.
These documents are being released as a result of a federal court order in a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the State Department, May 28, 2013, by Judicial Watch.
Judicial Watch also disclosed State Department turned over nearly 1,000 records to the Clinton Foundation beginning in January of 2014 for review prior to public release.
The lawsuit is ongoing and had previously forced the disclosure of documents that provided a roadmap of over 200 conflict of interest rulings that led to 48 million dollars for the Clinton Foundation and other Clinton connected entities during her tenure, Secretary of State.
The bottom line of this week is Judicial Watch says that the State Department documents that they have been given access to reveal Bill Clinton's activities with Saudi entities and government concern about them.
The documents contain concern at the highest levels of the U.S. government over Bill Clinton's activities with the Saudi entities.
Now this is just all coming at us now.
We don't know how legit any of this is.
This is obviously after a four-year request, two years after a lawsuit, the documents released this week, today, what have you.
And once again, on the other end of these documents, you find the regime.
Bill Clinton could be totally in the he might have gone over and discussed women with the king.
Who knows?
But the release says that the government is concerned about Bill Clinton activities with Saudi entities.
Now we already had the New York Times story where they detail Hillary Clinton facilitating Russia gaining control over the uranium market in exchange for at least three million dollars of donations.
And remember, there are others.
The $2.3 million donation came just from uh the chairman of the Canadian uranium company, but there are others again among the donors to the Clinton Foundation that had a role in the uranium deal in Canada.
Frank Justra, 31.3 million dollars, a pledge for 100 million dollars more.
He built a company that later merged with uranium one.
Ian Telfer, 2.35 million.
He's the mining investor, chairman of Uranium One when the Russian government acquired it.
Paul Reynolds donated between 1 million and 5 million dollars.
He was an advisor on the 2007 Eurasia Uranium One merger, and he later helped raise 260 million dollars for the company.
All of these people gave money to Clintons.
While she's Secretary of State.
So she looked the other way while all this was happening.
She was paid off to look the other way.
She was personally rich, as was her husband, while Russia cornered the market or tried to on uranium.
And here's Frank Holmes, 250,000 to 500,000, chief executive, U.S. global investors, which held 4.7 million dollars in shares of the Canadian Uranium Company in the first quarter of 2011.
That's the New York Times.
That is throat slitting.
That is to all of our minds here, unprecedented.
And the state of American journalism today is such that when you have just these facts, people on our side say, well, uh there's got to be an angle here that they're going to blame it all on the Republicans.
Can't blame people for thinking that.
The next story in the stack, and not necessarily in any chronological order, Washington Post.
That's right, even the Washington Post getting into the.
In fact, the Washington Post article.
I stopped editing this thing, and there are still 33 paragraphs left in it.
The Washington Post story details dozens of other lavish speech payments that Bill Clinton got from foreign entities.
And they're usually $500,000 or more just for a speech.
And all of these entities paying Clinton to give a speech had business with the State Department when Hillary ran it.
And none of these, or the vast majority, were ever disclosed.
That's what the stories were about.
None of these donations were disclosed.
The Clintons did not disclose any.
That's why the Reuters story is all about how the Clintons now are redoing all of their tax returns to finally report this stuff because they didn't.
They went Al Sharpton on the IRS.
And now the cover is blown and all of this is being revealed.
The Clintons are refiling all of their tax returns over the period of years involved here.
Headline, Washington Post, for Clinton's speech income shows how their wealth is intertwined with charity.
Stop and think of that for a second.
Look, I folks, just two examples.
Catherine and I are deeply involved with the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
I have been since its founding in the mid-90s.
We're one of their sponsors, the Rush Revere book series, children's books, time travel adventures for exceptional Americans.
The Leukemia Lymphoma Society.
We have we have been involved in donating and or raising tens of millions of dollars for both these charities.
And we know the people that run them.
And they're not wealthy.
They're not any wealthier today than when the charity started.
The Marine Corps Foundation, law enforcement foundation, has a pass-through of 99%.
You give a dollar, 99% goes to kids of children of Marines killed in action.
Leukemia lymphoma is pretty close to that.
There aren't people that went from nothing to a net worth of between 250 and 300 million dollars simply by having a foundation.
And the Clintons don't even have a charity.
It's just a foundation.
What is the charity that they do?
Save our girls' hashtag.
What do they do?
What does the Clinton Family Foundation do?
What charity does it promote?
Maybe it's a bunch of them, a little here, a little there, but I don't know anybody.
Maybe you do.
Now, if you want to look at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack, NGOs, charities, donors, you know, people there get rich.
Yeah, but that's a that's not above board either.
I don't know anybody.
I mean, even at some of the sleaziest charities, and we all know there have been.
Even at some of the sleaziest, the people that run them make half a million a year.
But nobody that I know becomes a member of the top 1% of the 1% with a foundation.
In fact, the fact of the matter is, for those of you in Rio Linda who will never have a foundation, the point of putting up a when you start a foundation and you put money into it, you lose control over that money.
You are donating it essentially.
When you start a foundation, it's a charitable, obviously, it's a charitable foundation.
You give the money and it's gone, you can't go spend it yourself.
I mean, the way it works in that case, let's say you you um come into some money, you want to start a foundation, and you do it to have a lump sum available to donate rather than have to take individual phone calls, or you maybe you want a large tax deduction in one year.
The rule of the foundation is roughly let's say you start a foundation with $500,000.
You get the deduction of $500,000 the year you put that money into it.
You have to donate at least 5% of it every year.
It can't just sit there.
But you don't have to donate much, it can just sit there, and it can keep earning money, but it's not yours anymore.
And the money that other people donate to it, it's not yours either.
You don't get it.
That's the whole point of it.
But the Clintons have this foundation that somehow they are the charity.
They go out and do a speech, raise money for the Clinton Family Foundation, $500,000 Clinton gets.
He says, Yeah, that's right, Limbaugh, that money goes straight to the foundation.
Well, how the hell do you people have $300 million bucks?
Because all you do is give speeches.
And I know that Mrs. Clinton, she didn't make anywhere near 10, 15, 20, whatever, 50 million dollars at Secretary of State.
Nobody does.
Where'd this money come from?
So I mean, look, I'm not saying that every dollar donated to their foundation ends up in their back pockets, but something is awry here.
Something is really out of kilter.
I don't know anybody who administers or runs a CEO, whatever, of a foundation of a charity, who essentially is the primary beneficiary of the thing.
Do you snurly, do you know anybody that runs a foundation?
Look at it.
The people who run the Ford Foundation do not have a net worth of 150 or 200 million because they run the foundation.
They may have it because of other things they've done in their lives or might have inherited it, but it's just unheard of here.
People I know at Leukemia and the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation don't have any more money today than they did when the thing started as a result of working with the foundation.
The foundation's not contributed a dimes.
That's not why they've done it.
I don't understand how this happens.
Right, Bill and Melinda Gates.
Well, yeah, that that's a but they started it.
They don't need to play any games to get rich.
They already played their games.
You know, they've they already got rich.
They're not a good comparison, but still, they start the foundation for other reasons, charitable included among them.
But I I'm just this is this just smells.
And now the the drive-by media going full bore, exposing all of this stuff, and basically raising the same questions I'm raising here.
How the hell does this happen?
Who gets $500,000 for a freaking speech anyway?
You know, one of the big things that people misunderstand.
Bill Clinton, we're told that he's a funny, lovable guy, has great charisma, is one of these guys that makes you think when he's talking to you that you're the only one in a room.
How many women have we heard say that?
I don't care how popular he is.
Anastas Mikoyan from Kazakhstan is not giving Bill Clinton 500 grand because he's a good guy.
Anastas Mikoyan, or whoever, is giving Clinton 500 grand because he expects somehow that Clinton is going to be in a position someday to pay that back.
That's going to be in some way favorable to Mr. Mikoyan.
And largely that's the assumption Mrs. Clinton is going to be in the White House someday.
But they didn't even have to wait for that.
She's Secretary of State.
She can look the other way while the Russians try to corner the market in uranium.
And who knows whatever else.
So you give Clinton 500 grand, that's a message to his wife, who is the Secretary of State.
And this has been going On for years.
The point of this is none of this is new.
What's new is the reporting.
What's new is the full bore nuclear bomb aspect of the reporting on this.
Everybody's known the Clintons have been doing this.
And it's one of the many things the Clintons have been doing that we on our side have just thrown up our hands, just assumed forever.
They're always going to get away with it because they're Democrats, they're liberals, they make minceme to conservatives.
That's why they're loved and adored, and nobody's going to ever hold them to account.
And now here we are on April 23rd, the day before the Apple Watch comes out.
And not saying it has anything to do with anything, but here comes bombardment on the Clintons.
And there now is sunlight being shined on all these things that everybody in the establishment in DC knows they've been doing all of these years anyway.
And they may not be the only ones, by the way, but I mean they are defining how to do it.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out and start getting some of your phone calls in because people do want to weigh in, and if I were you, I would want to too.
So sit tight.
Back with more after this.
I do not believe this.
Yes.
So Josh Ernest, unrelated here for just a second.
As you know, the the regime today announced that two Americans were killed in a counterterrorism raid that we initiated against Al Qaeda.
We ended up killing two hostages.
One of them was an American with a drone strike.
Okay.
Announced that this morning.
Obama went out to the Bergdahl Garden and sort of took responsibility for it.
And then elsewhere in the regime, they said he wasn't responsible.
Now, Josh Ernest is doing the press briefing.
You know what he just said?
He just said Congress has a role in drone policy.
Congress doesn't have a role in immigration.
Congress doesn't have a role in practically anything else.
But now that the regime is as mistakenly erroneously killed an American in a counterterrorism op, all of a sudden Congress has a role in the policy that sent the drone up there.
I'm sure Boehner and McConnell are on the phones.
What?
When did we order the drone strike?
That's incredible.
Okay.
Ask.
In my case, I asked, I've got the answer.
I mentioned to you mere moments ago that have a post here from the Federalist.com.
U.S. Constitution actually bans Hillary's foreign government payola.
And I mentioned that there actually is a clause in the Constitution which bans what she did.
And it the clause actually has a has a name.
It is the I'll find it.
It's not the point.
The story contains some relevant information.
To set it up, I must tell you, Howard Dean was on TV this morning attempting to defend the Clintons and their personal wealth as a result of their foundation by saying, Howard Dean on TV saying, hey, look at all this money went to charitable causes.
All of it went to things like reducing malaria and improving people's standards of living.
And that simply cannot be.
Otherwise, Bill and Hillary Clinton would not have such a high net worth.
150 to 300 million, I think it's reported.
Anyway, the Federalist reports, here's the answer.
You know, I said the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, 99% passed through.
The Clinton Family Foundation passed through is 15%.
The Federalist reports, only 15% of the money donated to the Clinton Family Foundation went to actual charitable causes.
The bulk of the money donated to the Clinton Family Foundation went to travel salaries, benefits.
60% of all the money raised went to other expenses.
Thank you.
In other words, folks, 85% of every dollar donated to the Clinton Foundation ended up either with the Clintons or with their staff to pay for travel, salaries, and benefits.
Fifteen cents of every dollar actually went to some charitable beneficiary.
And 60, 60, a whopping six zero percent of all the money donated to and raised by the Clinton Family Foundation went to a category called other expenses.
And other expenses we are left to define ourselves.
Could other expenses mean salaries and benefits for the Clintons and their exhaustive hard work helping others?
Well, this is your answer.
There's a 15% pass through rate, the Clinton Family Foundation.
15% of every dollar goes to a charity.
85% goes to enriching people that have anything to do with it.
And that's why they're re-filing tax reports, tax forms, tax returns for all these years.
Just one more observation, my friends, before we head to the phones, and it is this.
Every bit of this news that we are reporting today with the Clintons and the Foundation and the money and the donors and the causes and so forth.
This has all been known.
Another suspicious aspect of this is that the drive-by media waits until she has made her announcement.
They don't.
They didn't run with this stuff before she officially claimed she was seeking the presidency.
They could have.
They could have run this stuff three weeks ago, month ago, six weeks ago.
They sat on this stuff.
They sat on this stuff until Mrs. Clinton had finished all of her paid speeches.
Remember, it was even known that she was delaying her announcement until she finished the paid speech schedule, which ended in March.
They waited.
They waited until she committed before letting fly with all this.
If I were the Clintons, I'd be shell-shocked right now.
I I would be, you know, I'd be caught, David Brock, what the hell have you done here?
You're supposed to stop this stuff from happening to us.
Sidney Blumenthal, where the hell have you been?
John Podesta, how did you let this happen?
You know, all the insurance policies they've hired, all the power brokers to keep this stuff from ever happening have all failed them with their buddies in the drive-by media.
There's a caveat, there could be a whole lot more to this that we don't know that somehow will explain it all later.
You never know.
The Clintons might call an emergency press conference for Friday afternoon at 5 o'clock and have an answer for all of this that just sweeps the story away, and then imagine how dispirited you'd feel.
Now, Snur.
Snerdley is shaking his head.
What's he gonna say?
I'm not a crook.
No, what if they've got evidence that none of this is true?
What if all this is made up?
You know, I'm just speculating here.
Uh well, I think I think I do know him pretty well.
I know him pretty well.
Uh but I'm that's no question about it.
That's what Whitewater was all about.
Money is what drives these people.
Well, money drives everybody.
I I don't care what people say.
Money drives everybody.
But these people obsessed.
They obsessed over what they didn't Have they envied what other people did have, particularly people they ran with.
And I'm telling you from the 80s, a leftist in the 80s didn't think that rich people were legitimate.
They got it by chicanery, trickery, uh thievery, inside knowledge, knowing somebody, it could not have been the result of hard work.
That's what Whitewater was.
It was their feeble attempt to pretend they were big players.
In a real estate market.
I'm I guarantee you Hillary was behind that.
I guarantee I can guarantee you exactly why all that happened.
In the old parlor's, it was a get rich quick scheme, because that's what they thought everybody else did.
And she was sick and tired.
There's her husband.
She gave up everything.
And her husband's sitting there as governor of some Hayseed State, 25 grand a year, and she has to work at the Rose Law Firm for 106 grand a year, and they're hanging around with the Thomasons or a multi-millionaires and everybody else.
Not for long, buddy.
So hello, Susan McDougall and Jim What's his face over at Whitewater?
And then all this started the train rolling.
And that gave us Johnny John One, Charlie Tree, the dubious Chinese barbecue place in Little Rock.
I mean, it just it all adds up.
Anyway, to the phones, because I promise this is Jay in East Liverpool, Ohio.
I'm glad you waited, sir, and welcome.
Hey, Russ.
Uh, I heard your question.
I appreciate you giving me the opportunity to take a stab at it.
Sure.
Okay, so here's what I'm thinking.
The biggest fear of any presidential campaign is an October surprise, right?
I mean, that's what we always hear about.
Most of the time they turn out, you know, they fizzle out and turn out to be nothing.
But a legitimate October surprise, and by legitimate, I mean something where there's there's uh a smoking gun or uh something that's that it gives it legitimacy that people will look at it and say, yeah, you know what, this kind of fits with what I know about the candidate.
Um and I think that's that's the big fear here is that there's some a smoking gun, a blue dress, if you will, that somebody's sitting on waiting until just the right moment, because that's the other key with uh good October surprises it's well timed.
And the problem is that the people don't know what's in her emails.
And everybody thinks that that the people who are most interested in those emails are the Republicans and Trey Gowdy.
But I really think the people are most interested are the ones that Hillary are gonna is going to be hitting up for tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars for a campaign.
And the media, I mean, once once she's the candidate, she and uh the media are basically gonna have a wedding ceremony.
They're gonna be joined at the hip.
Wait a second now.
Wait a minute now.
You're off you're you get you got two theories here, or is this all part of one theory?
No, it's part of one theory.
Okay, hold it.
Now don't go any further.
Let me see if I understand.
I'm gonna see if I'm up to speed with you right now.
So you think the media is nervous about supporting Hillary not knowing what those emails contain because they don't want to go all in for somebody that's going to be blown away by an October surprise containing this kind of stuff.
They don't want to make that mistake, so they're trying to find out what's in these emails now before they commit to her.
Right, right.
And this so they're essentially now getting the October surprise out of the way a year and a half early.
I think their hope is is to draw the fire.
It's just like in the old war movies where somebody where there's a standoff and somebody throws a rock out in the middle of of no man's land to draw the fire.
So I think this is the New York Times and and and the others, this is their version of throwing that rock out there to see where the fire comes from, to see who's holding what.
Because there who knows where these emails went to.
Who knows how many different aides saw different emails?
Who knows what's out there?
And and you know, we look at it and say, well, you know, what what might be uh, you know, what could we use uh to hurt Hillary?
Well, that do you think that people are going to be asked to contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to campaign aren't thinking the same thing and the people in the media?
The way I look at it.
Okay, so wait, wait.
There's one thing I miscon I I think I now get it.
You think that that the October surprise is being done now to take her out now.
Not necessarily.
I think they're wanting to see if somebody's holding something, because they're gonna be tempted.
If you if you've got a damning email and you see all this other stuff coming out and the media focusing on all this, would there not be a temptation to rather than hold your fire till October, would there not be a temptation to go ahead and go public with it now?
And I think they they need to know, they need to know can this horse make it across the finish line.
Who again, I'm losing who is they.
Well, I think both the media and the big big money donors because the media.
But they're finding out.
Wait a minute.
No, they're finding out.
They're they're finding there this is enough.
I don't think they know the extent of what's out there.
So you think this is an effort to find out everything else that's in there?
Yeah, well, it's just like, okay, look, if if if if they're getting married, basically.
Once once she's once she's the candidate, they they are in a partnership or a marriage.
If it's if if you're considering ha inviting somebody to get in bed with you, you want to know who else they've been in bed with.
They want to know who else Hillary's been in bed with.
This is their version of uh, you know, uh an SDD test for Hillary.
Find out where else has she been?
What what else might change her going forward?
Because we need to know now either to try to fix it, you know, to deal with it, or to cut her loose and find somebody else.
I don't I don't think the media has any loyalty to the Clintons necessarily.
They have a least their loyalty is with the Democrat Party.
So if they don't I don't think they really care that much about who's the candidate, as long as it's somebody who can beat the Republican.
Uh that is true.
And and I've I've thought since 2008 that the media has not been all in for Hillary.
Bill's a different story.
Bill, they love Bill.
Oh, man.
I mean, Nina Burley said she'd give Bill a Lowinski just for keeping abortion legal.
Time magazine reported the women in the drive-by's love Clinton.
They're still dreaming, you know, that it was him and not Juanita Broderick.
Uh, them and not with Broderick or Paula Jones.
They're jealous of these people.
Hillary's a different matter.
She's the ice queen, you know, she's nurse ratchet.
Well, okay, interesting theory.
This is part of the vetting process in other words.
They're letting the stuff out.
The donors seeing if they can withstand the heat, find out what else is in there, do the October surprise now, and if uh if she can't make it, find out now, dump her and go somewhere else.
Um let me, before you go, do you think this is yes or no?
Do you think that this is part of a process to help her get elected?
I think it's a process to find out whether or not she's going to make it across the finish line in the end.
They want to know now whether this horse can cross the finish line.
And if she is, if she can't do it.
Interesting theory that they don't want to do anything to help her do that.
They want to find out in your theory if she can do it on her own.
They're not interested in covering anything up for her, according to your theory.
They don't want to help her cross the finish line, they're throwing the stuff out there.
In other words, the proverbial excrement is being thrown up against the wall, and everybody's watching to see what sticks.
And if too much of it sticks, it's bye-bye, Sayanara Hillary, and hello, Elizabeth Warren or whoever else.
All right, cool.
Back after you younger listeners, those of you who are millennials, and others of you who were alive and paying attention during Whitewater, but still are not sure what it really was.
Would you like for me to tell you in one paragraph what it was?
You really want to know what Whitewater was.
It's real simple, and it's real slimy.
Whitewater, the Clintons rightwater with w uh uh uh scam with uh with Jim McDougall and his wife Susan.
He was the money guy.
Clintons didn't have any money.
It was a real estate scam where they bought development property, resort type property, near bodies of water and so forth, Whitewater in uh in Arkansas.
They built homes, they bought lots, and what they did, they aimed this development at seasoned citizens.
It was a it we it was not an old folks home.
It was it was single family homes, seasoned Citizens, wealthy, moderately wealthy retirees could buy and live in single family dwellings.
The Clintons would cheat the seniors out of their down payments.
If the buyer missed one mortgage payment, the Clintons repossessed the property and resold it.
And they did this over and over.
And it was a scam designed to sell property to people who couldn't afford it.
They got the down payment from them.
And then, you know, of course, when something's financed, the finance company gives you the payment, and the person living in it makes monthly payments.
So you sell a house, you get the money for it from the bank or whoever.
The person with the mortgage pays the bank back.
Well, the Clintons got the money.
The McDougall's got the money from whoever was financing it.
And if these retirees missed, it was in the it was in the documentary.
You missed one mortgage payment, the thing was repossessed.
And they did this, and they kept flipping these properties over and over.
I mean, it was a it was it was targeted to the seasoned citizen population, but it was not just limited to them, but the people that were ended up uh getting approval to buy property were people who it was suspected might not be able to make a payment at some point.
And when they missed one, the Whitewater Development Corporation swept in there and repossessed the property and kicked out the old folks and resold the property.
That's essentially what Whitewater was.
Now it took the New York Times, gosh, how many days and reams of paper and words to explain it all.
But if you're like me, and you can make the complex understandable, that's essentially what uh it was.
The Clintons were the original predatory lenders.
The Clintons were the ones that told the subprime guys, showed the subprime guys how it's done.
You qualify people who aren't qualified, you take advantage of when they can't pay, you repossess, and you resell it.
The subprime was obviously a little different than that, but that's what Whitewater was.
It was a get-rich quick scheme.
It was designed to sell again and again properties over and over, not sell a bunch of properties, just you know, sell a few and flip them.
Predatory lending.
And the Clintons, that's what everybody else did.
There weren't any legitimately wealthy people.
Everybody cheated people.
I mean, hell, that's what liberals think anyway.
They don't need to resent rich people uh on the cum.
They do anyway.
They don't believe that wealth is legitimate unless it's inherited like the Kennedys.
Uh Matthew in Columbia, Maryland, I'm glad you waited.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Hello.
Gosh, I guarantee absolutely that Martin O'Malley will be the Democratic nominee.
Don't doubt me.
Why do you say that?
Because he's this generation's Bill Clinton.
He's handsome, he talks well, he'll fight Hillary from the left, and most importantly, nobody wants Hillary.
Everybody hates Hillary, but they're scared to death to say it.
When you say everybody, you mean in the media and on the on the media on the left?
The media on the left, Hollywood, Matt Lauer, Savannah Gumphury, you name it.
Nobody wants her, nobody likes her, but they're scared to death to say it.
Something about what you're saying is ringing a bell that and it's just recently that, and in fact, I even had it here.
We talked about how the uh that that Hillary was really not loved and adored, it was just that the Republicans are hated more.
And I'll do real, I'll do you even better.
Elizabeth Warren will be his run his running mate.
Uh-huh.
Uh-huh.
You think even O'Malley is going to overcome Hollywood's love for Elizabeth Warren and beat her, huh?
Yes, absolutely, because she's too inexperienced, she's too far wacko.
But when you have Martin O'Malley as the front man who's just as wacko and just as extreme as her, they're gonna fall in love with him.
When do they care about wacko?
Wacko is what they think is normal now.
Exactly, which is why Martin O'Malley will be the nominee.
Hillary Clinton is Vladimir Putin.
Everybody's scared to death of the retribution if they come out.
Tom Hanks, all those Hollywood folks, they don't want to say that they're against Hillary.
They don't want to say that they want Elizabeth Warren or Martin O'Malley.
Well remember they may still have those 900 FBI files.
I mean that's the one.
Yes, they do.
The media will latch on to Martin O'Malley.
I guarantee he will be the Democratic.
There you have it, folks.
Martin O'Malley, the nominee from Matthew in Columbia, Maryland.
If anybody would know he would.
It is the fastest three hours in media.
The proof is how fast it goes by every day.
We were already done with two hours.
We only have one big exciting broadcast hour remaining, and we're gonna get straight to it.
We get back from our obscene profit timeout here at the top of the hour.
Much more.
▲
Export Selection