All Episodes
Previous Next
April 16, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:23
April 16, 2015, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And by the way, folks, I don't mean to be beating this to dead horse, but it's worth mentioning.
The Daily Mail online, formerly UK Daily Mail Online.
That article also points out that Hillary even used ringers in her announcement video, which also featured supposedly average, normal, spontaneous, everyday people, three of whom turned out to be Democrat operatives.
Greetings, welcome back, Rushlin Baugh and the EIB Network.
Happy to have you here.
I can't believe we're already at Thursday, but we are.
The telephone number, if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882, and the email address, LRushbo at EIBNet.com.
By the way, I've got, yes, yes, yes.
I'll tell you what I think about the Apple Watch at some point.
The rollout.
That's what you want.
Everybody wants to know, apparently Apple has with, let me just save it for later.
I don't want to get sidetracked with this yet, but I'll get to it.
The New York Times, I'm going to get to this later too, but I just want to tease you with it.
They have a column here by Thomas B. Edsel.
Now, that name might ring a bell.
Thomas B. Edsel used to write at the Washington Post, to be Washington for those of you in Riolinda.
And after leaving the Washington Post and now writing opinion pieces now and then for the New York Times, he has been involved in, I think, the Obama campaign somehow.
Not a direct paid participant, but there's been a linkage there.
Anyway, he's the guy in November of 2011 who had a column in the New York Times explaining how the Obama campaign was going to expressly ignore white working class family voters.
They were in the process of losing them anyway.
So they were just going to write them off and make up the difference by going after minorities, such as intensifying the effort on Hispanics, African Americans, women, lesbian, gay, transgenders, and so forth.
And what was noteworthy about it was here you had an incumbent president and somebody close to his campaign writing a piece acknowledging that the votes of white working class people were of no interest to them anymore.
That alone, and that's what it said.
I mean, that was the point of the column.
I was stunned not because of anything racial, don't misunderstand, because that's a large group of people, white working class reed, blue collar.
However, you are traditional Democrat voters.
White working class families.
These are the people.
Many of them had participated in the creation of TEA Party.
They were ticked off at Obamacare and all of the debt and everything, and everything was being written off, and there were a lot of them.
Now, if you wanted to add the racial component to it, you could, and you could get even more interesting, but that was not my, my initial take.
It was just a large number of people to just cast aside, and it was a tantamount admission, by the same token, that they'd lost them anyway.
Many of those people had voted for Obama in 2008.
So anyway, that's who Thomas B. Edsol is.
He has an op-ed in the New York Times yesterday.
Might have been posted last night.
I'm not sure.
But the headline is, has Obamacare turned voters against sharing the wealth?
Now, this is unbelievable.
To see this in the New York Times, to have this open, it's a long piece, 750, maybe 1,000 words.
The whole premise is Edsol is voicing concern felt by many on the left that the larger liberal agenda of the redistribution of wealth, the redistribution of income, is in trouble because Obamacare is not working and, in fact, may be turning voters against the concept.
In other words, Obamacare is such a disaster.
People on the left are worried that it is so prominent a failure and it's so obviously a socialist plan and that it is failing so dramatically might turn the socialist or left-wing agenda, turn people against it.
With the advent of the Affordable Care Act, the share of Americans convinced that health care is a right shrink from a majority to a minority.
The shift in public opinion on this, a major victory for the Republican Party.
And it's part of a larger trend, a steady decline in support for the redistributive government policies.
Emmanuel Saez, an economics professor at Berkeley and one of the nation's premier experts on inequality.
How in the world do you kidding me?
You have to be a college professor to be an expert on inequality?
Mr. Snerdley, how much money do you have in your pocket right now?
Okay, I've got 500 in my pocket.
I know that what you and I have is unequal, and I didn't go to college.
What is this?
A professor at Berkeley who is an expert on inequality?
That's not what he's an expert.
He's an expert socialist.
He's an expert at hacking away at the well-to-do.
That's what this means.
An expert on inequality is somebody who is expert and adept at devising policies to take money away from people who have it.
Anyway, they're worried.
And we'll get into this in greater detail as the program, when I finish this Hillary stuff, that frankly bores me.
But we got to do it.
You have to do it.
This is low-hanging fruit, this Hillary stuff.
I cannot ignore this.
But this whole, you know, healthcare is a right.
You know, who started that line of thinking?
A guy named Harris Wofford, who was a senator from Pennsylvania back in the, I forget, 80s.
And during one of his reelection campaigns, he ran around saying, if the Constitution provides you a lawyer because you are too destitute or too poor to afford one, well, then, by God, the Constitution will provide you health care if you get sick.
And of course, low-information people all over the country cheered, got rapidly happy over such a premise.
And they started polling it.
And a majority of people originally supported the whole concept that health care is a right.
But with the advent of Obamacare and all of the inherent problems, that's not now a majority point of view.
A majority of Americans do not view it as a right.
And when that's the case, they are not going to support redistribution to make it happen.
And when they don't support redistribution, they're not supporting liberalism.
They're not supporting socialism.
Now, I don't expect that to stop Democrats.
They're governing against the will of the people even now.
Democrats don't care about the will.
I mean, ego-wise, they'd love to have it, but it doesn't stop them.
Public opinion doesn't stop them.
Let me remind you, case in point, 2012 mid or 2014 midterms.
Just as in 2010, the Democrat Party got shellacked.
Democrat Party lost seats.
Now, combined with 2010, over 1,200 seats, electoral seats from the U.S. Congress all the way down to local town council all over the country.
It was a huge shellacking.
And you remember Mitch McConnell shortly after the Republicans took control of the Senate expressing his surprise that Obama had not moved to the center as a result?
I'm sure you remember that.
It was a ridiculous assumption.
It's rooted in the old days that politicians responded to public opinion.
And if the public rejected something and they truly believed that in order to maintain public opinion and hope to be elected in the future, they had to moderate their views.
And here Obama was doubling down.
Not only was he not moving to the center, he was moving further to the left in utter defiance of the voters.
And Mitch McConnell couldn't understand it.
Because the Republicans, when they think they lose and public opinion goes against them, they all of a sudden favor amnesty.
They come out in favor of whatever it is the people that voted against them believe.
Because that's what you have to do in politics.
But you see, folks, the Democrat Party doesn't care about public opinion.
They'd love to have it.
But it doesn't stop them if they don't.
I maintain to you that Barack Obama, the Democrat Party, been governing against the will of the people for the past six years.
I think Obama was elected under false pretense.
A lot of people thought they were getting something other than what they got.
I don't think the American people voted for this.
They didn't vote for this debacle called Obamacare.
They didn't vote for Iran to get nuclear weapons.
The American people didn't vote for the 30-hour work week.
The American people didn't vote for an $18 trillion national debt.
The American people didn't vote for anything that they're getting here.
Hasn't stopped Obama, has it?
Hasn't stopped the Democrat Party.
So this New York Times piece said they're worried that people are losing faith in the whole philosophy behind the redistribution of wealth.
It's interesting, but it isn't going to stop them.
It's just going to make them angrier.
Oh, you don't believe what we believe, huh?
Hey, you like tax increases?
Here, take that.
Democrats do not react kindly to people who do not support them.
And public opinion, necessary evil.
They can find a way to ignore it.
They damn well will.
Now, Harris Wofford, Senator Pennsylvania, was 1991 to 1995.
Harris Wofford is the man responsible for the claim that health care was a right because you're entitled to one.
A lawyer, if you are accused, and some of you can't afford a lawyer, the Constitution gives you a lawyer.
It should give you health care.
Yay, yay.
He was a senator from 1991 to 1995.
One term defeated by Rick Santorum when he was only in there because John Hines died in office, a helicopter crash or collision between the airplane he was on and a helicopter.
And that freed up Teresa Hines to marry the haughty John Kerry, who had served in Vietnam.
He took his time on that, but plans were well laid.
Here's Kevin in Tifton, Ohio.
As we head back to the phones, I'm glad you called, sir, and welcome to our program.
Thanks, Rush.
Yeah, I was just wondering why there was no mention of the security issues around his visit to Chipotle.
What were the security issues at Chipotle?
Well, not that there was any specifically, but this is a former first lady.
I mean, who knows what could have happened in there?
I mean, she just had her and another lady, right?
Well, was there security there or not?
See, I don't even know that.
That's my question.
It probably wasn't.
And that's kind of frightening because who knows?
Like, there could have been a terrorist in there or whatever.
Well, no, they vetted this place the night before.
That's the thing.
They knew they didn't.
They wanted to portray Mrs. Clinton as a fearless.
That's why Bill's not around, by the way.
You ever wonder where Bill is?
No, good point.
Where's Bill?
I mean, here's her announce week, and Bill isn't there.
She's talking to waitresses.
That's one reason.
But Bill's not there, so there's a reason for that, too.
I think the reason that Bill isn't there could be any number of things.
They could have polling data.
They could have Google data that people don't like Bill and Hillary together.
It could well be that Hillary's supporters are not crazy when Bill is there because many of them are feminazis and they don't like him coming along stealing the limelight.
It could be that he's sick, not up to it.
It could be that it just obviously so overshadows and takes over and becomes the focal point, and they can't afford that.
Well, yeah, we know that.
We know he's got dates lined up, but he can easily schedule a date on the same day that he shows up for a half hour at a diner.
Point is, he's not there.
He's nowhere in sight, out of sight, out of mind.
And of course, there's no, now there is security all over traveling.
They're in front of and behind and probably in the van.
But the reason there's no security in the places is because they're all vetted.
The security goes in there well in advance of Mrs. Clinton's arrival.
And they take a look at the place and all that.
And make no mistake, they're around.
But as part of her desire to create this vision, these pictures, average, ordinary, everyday housewife running for president, walking into a diner, the average, ordinary American does not walk in with Secret Service protection or bodyguards.
All part of the show.
Kevin, I appreciate the call.
This is Pete in Seattle.
Great to have you, sir.
Thank you for waiting.
And hello.
Hello, Rush.
Good to talk to you.
Thank you, sir.
I have an apology to make.
When I first heard you, I was a little aghast at how you were responding to a presidential candidate's wife.
And you were 100% correct.
Wait a minute.
Now, this is you're going back to the 90s, Bill and Hillary?
92.
And That same president's wife was in Seattle to start her national bus tour in, I believe it was 1994.
Right, for Hillary Care.
That's exactly right.
I remember that bus tour very well.
And this was the go ahead.
No, no, you finish your thought.
This was the first stop, and she had our two U.S. senators with her, and they had like 500 IAM and SEIU members bust in.
So it was supposed to be a choreographed event, but it was announced like the day or a couple days prior that she was going to be here.
And a fellow that was on your station at the time, Kirby Wilbur, announced that he was going down there.
And about 1,500 or 2,000 members of Wilbur's warriors showed up.
And so these people were outnumbered like three or four to one.
And the crowd was polite.
I mean, the opposition crowd was very polite, but they were tossing out questions that she had.
See, this happened at every step.
Back then, you hated me, right?
You didn't like the way I was treating the wife of the President of the United States.
You thought Kirby Wilber was a great guy, but you're mad at me.
No, it was irrelevant, I thought, what some guy's wife thinks or is that's running for office.
I was shown how wrong I was.
I see.
I see.
Okay.
Well, I remember that bus tour very well because we sabotaged practically every stop.
At every stop, we engineered more anti-Hillary health care bodies, people, than Hillary had supporters.
There was even one, help me out on this, Mr. Snerdley.
I've got a vague memory that we even caused them to change the route one day.
They had their announced route.
Everybody knew well in advance what the stops are going to be.
And they, under cover of darkness, changed the route so that they could go to a place that was unannounced.
They announced that they were going to be there just two or three hours in advance, hoping to at least have one stop where Hillary's supporters outnumbered the detractors.
And we even sabotaged that one.
Now, I use the word sabotage lightly.
We didn't do anything.
We're just talking about the Hillary health care tour and her bus tour.
And she's highlighted this thing.
And it was made to look like that she is going coast to coast on a bus to demonstrate all of the massive national support for Hillary Care.
And it didn't exist.
Hillary Care was not supported by a majority of people, just like Obamacare never was.
Hillary Care wasn't either, but they were trying to create the impression that it was with this fake bus tour.
Well, it wasn't a fake bus tour, but a bus tour with all of these supporters lined up as just average ordinary people rapidly supporting the idea.
And we were able to turn out more people just here on the radio.
Hey, you know, Hillary's coming to, you know, we're at Dodge City tomorrow.
Be great if you could turn out and greet Hillary.
That's all we had to say.
We didn't have to say turn out and boo because they were, as Pete said here, they were polite.
But you could say they were frustrated.
What was the name of this bus tour?
What was the name of that bus tour?
Anyway, Hillary's been using plants all of her life.
She uses plants in the audience of her question and answer appearances.
She did 2008 during that campaign.
But the bus tour, I will never forget.
It's stop after stop after stop.
Hillary and her supporters vastly outnumbered.
It was fun, and we'll be back.
The name of that bus tour was the Health Security Express.
And there were 16 buses.
I mean, it was massive.
She had her clack.
She had the SEIU crowd out there.
She had all these union people were on the bus.
And they were made to look like just average, ordinary, everyday Americans, just like the people in the Chipotle in the coffee shop, wherever she goes now.
And she did the same thing in 2008.
She had a bus tour.
It wasn't nearly as big.
It didn't have 16 buses in it.
That was called the Middle Class Express in 2008.
I hope she does it again here.
I hope her campaign lasts long enough for there to be another bus tour.
16 big buses.
The stop that broke the camel's back when they decided to fake the itinerary was somewhere, if my memory serves, at Oklahoma.
The bus tour started in Seattle.
Pete was right.
Started in Seattle and it winded its way down toward the through Colorado, the straight line through the Rockies, over the Rockies, through the Rockies, whatever they did, into Kansas, down to Oklahoma.
And they were going to turn up and head up toward New York to wrap the thing up, or maybe Washington.
And the wheels came off in Oklahoma.
That's when they had to change the itinerary under cover of darkness and didn't tell anybody.
But of course, we had spies.
We had secret agents that were reporting.
So they weren't able to get anything.
They did.
We didn't know they were going to an alternate location until they were rolling.
But we had plenty of time to alert people before they got there.
Anyway, let's move on to the fake grandparents now.
Oops.
Well, I'll get that later.
This is the story from BuzzFeed that anybody could have found by going to Ancestry.com.
Speaking in Iowa on Wednesday, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that all of her grandparents had immigrated to the United States, a story that conflicts with public census and other records related to her maternal and paternal grandparents.
The story of her grandmother specifically immigrating is one Clinton has told before.
Now, Clinton's sole foreign-born grandparent, Hugh Rodham Sr., immigrated as a child.
A Clinton spokesman told BuzzFeed News, her grandparents always spoke about the immigration experience.
And as a result, she's always thought of them as immigrants.
Now, see, this is, again, another thing that is classically identified, not just with Hillary, but with every other democrat.
Everything is fake.
Everything is manufactured.
Everything is designed to pierce the voter's heart with emotion.
Okay, so we've got a big issue out there is immigration.
And executive amnesty is on the table.
And this involves, in addition to the issue itself, a minority Hispanics.
And so it's not enough for Mrs. Clinton to say she's pro-immigration.
Not enough.
Not enough for her to say that she thinks we ought to grant amnesty.
No, no, it's never enough.
No, she is for this because she has direct contact with it in her life.
She is related to people who were immigrants.
And if the country was as opposed to immigrants when her grandparents came as the Republicans are today, why she might not even have been born an American, to which everybody would cheer.
But this is the way they make these things up.
They literally make it up out of whole cloth.
They manufacture these biographical sketches and stories.
And they rely on the fact that the drive-bys are not going to check it out.
The drive-bys are not going to vet any of this.
And they also know that if the Republicans do and try to make some hay out of it, that the drive-bys will take care of the Republicans or anybody else in the media tries to make a big deal out of it.
So they go into this with relative confidence until they get away with it.
Clinton himself did this.
I mean, how many times did he tell us, you know, when I was a boy, I can't tell you the number of times.
I was reduced to tears when I saw black churches burning.
I can't tell you, man.
I see the Klan coming and I knew what was going to happen.
Either they're going to torture church or they're going to grab some poor guy and they're going to put it behind the back bumper of their truck and drag him down a dirt road.
I've seen that.
He never saw it.
He never saw a church burn.
He never saw any of that.
Just make it up.
They all do it because they all think that who they are is not enough.
They've got to manufacture.
They all have direct contact with it in their past.
They have personal knowledge.
Therefore, they have credibility.
So BuzzFeed gets hold of this campaign and somebody says, well, her grandparents always spoke about the immigrant experience.
And as a result, Hillary has always thought of them as immigrants.
And is that all it takes?
Like, if my grandfather would have constantly spoken about the immigrant experience, could I have said that my grandfather was an immigrant?
That's all it takes?
He talked about it with such devotion.
He talked about it with such care.
She's always thought of them as immigrants.
Well, what if they're not in the way she means it?
What if they weren't?
What if they were born here?
Which they were.
Well, they always talked of the immigrant experience as far as Hillary.
Oh, you mean like when she went out and told everybody she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary?
Yeah, yeah, you got it.
Exactly like that.
But Edmund Hillary hadn't climbed anything when she was born.
Nobody knew who he was when she was born.
Well, but after she was born, everybody knew what Edmund Hillary did.
And her parents always said that they wanted to name her after somebody famous.
They named her after Edmund Hillary.
But Edmund Hillary, she couldn't have been named after Edmund Hillary because he wasn't anything.
Nobody knew who he was.
Yes, she was.
End of story.
That's one of the reasons why these people bore me because it's all fake.
They can't rely on who they really are for some reason.
They're not genuine enough.
They have to go out and add to it and embellish.
Mrs. Clinton says, All my grandparents, you know, they came over here.
And, you know, my grandfather went to work at a lace mill in Scranton.
And, you know, he worked there until he retired at 65.
And he started there when he was, you know, a teenager.
And he just kept going, Clinton said.
We're turning down people who really want to work.
I mean, they're here to work.
And a lot of them now have children who are American citizens.
And they're doing the best they can to try to make a good life for themselves, you know, and their families.
And, you know, I think if you were just go around this room, there are a lot of immigrant stories.
my grandparents you know came over here and you know my i'm quoting by the way here she said all of these you knows and you know my grandfather went to work at a lace mill in scranton and worked there until he retired at 65.
My grandmother on my father's side, Hannah Jones Rodham, by the way insisted on using all three names.
I wasn't the first in my family, despite what people in Scranton might have thought at the time.
How shameless, how pathetic is this.
My grandmother my grandmother on my father's side, Hannah Jones Rodham, by the way insisted on using all three names, despite what people in Scranton might have thought at the time.
Oh so that's why Hillary calls herself Hillary Rodham Clinton, because she had a trailblazing grandmother in Scranton Pennsylvania, who didn't care what they, what the patriarchal society, thought back then.
It's this kind of made-up crap folks, that makes me wonder why is anybody afraid of this?
This is so easily rooted out.
Buzzfeed just did it, and they did it at Ancestry.com.
So i'm not.
I'm not surprised, I would not have.
I would have expected her to lie about whatever issue is front and center.
She'll have a personal connection to it.
I guarantee you, if they have to make it up, she'll have a personal connection to it.
So here she got a personal connection.
Her grandparents she lies about them immigrating.
How many autobiographies this woman written not how many have people bought.
How many autobiographies has she written and how many semi-autobiographies we had?
It takes a village.
We've had this debacle, 14 million dollar advance for a book, nobody bought a book tour, nobody attended.
And Buzzfeed outs her at Ancestry.com to the audio soundbites.
Yesterday afternoon Norwalk Iowa, Capital City, fruit Hillary, Clinton campaign roundtable with small business owners no doubt paid to be.
We are turning down people who really want to work.
I mean, they are here to work and a lot of them now have children who are American citizens and they are doing the best they can to try to make a good life for themselves and their families.
And you know, I think if we were to just go around this room, there are a lot of immigrant stories.
You know, all my grandparents, you know, came uh over here and so I sit here and I think.
Well, you're talking about the second, third generation.
That's me, that's you.
I came here, you know I well, i'm one of you.
I'm one of them.
I may not look Hispanic, but i'm one of them.
They'd deport me if they could, those Republicans.
That's why i'm in solidarity with them.
You know my grandparents.
They had to fight it.
My grandparents, it's all made up and she kept going.
She wasn't.
There's some more.
You knows here my grandmother on my father's side, Hannah Jones Rodham, who, by the way, insisted on using all three names, despite what people in Scranton, Pennsylvania might have thought at the time, was one of those tough Methodist women who was never afraid to get her hands dirty.
She traced her Methodism back to the Wesley brothers themselves, who converted her great-grandparents in the small coal mining villages of southern Wales.
She immigrated with her family as a young girl to Scranton.
She was born there.
The ancestry.com stuff, she was born there.
Everybody she's talking about was born in Pennsylvania.
They've published at BuzzFeed the actual census documents, the actual handwritten forms.
It's all there.
This is all made up.
Congenital liar.
William Sapphire called her a congenital liar.
They were not happy about that.
But that's what Sapphire called her.
So anyway, grab sunbite number five.
Now, this guy, John Dickerson, that CBS just hired to replace Bob Schieffer, this guy, this guy, he's got roots to the media.
You remember Nancy Dickerson, the NBC Info Babe, way, way back when she might have been the only one.
Well, Barbara Walters was always there, but she was one of the first.
Then Jessica Savage came along, but Nancy Dickerson beach.
She had a baby, and John was the baby.
And a big, I mean, wealthy family, they just go way, we have a huge mansion this guy grew up in, which is, it's no big deal to me, but they try to portray themselves as average, ordinary, everyday people.
They're not.
Anyway, this is the guy who used to write for Slate.
I think he still does.
And he told Obama in an advice column, you go out, you pulverize these Republicans.
You have to destroy the Republican Party.
That is your mission.
This is the guy CBS just hired to take over for Bob Schieffer at Face the Nation.
Anyway, this guy, John Dickerson, he's on CBS this morning today.
He's their political director.
And the co-host, Vanita Nyer, said, you were with Hillary in Iowa out there, John.
And of course, one of the big questions is how are voters responding to her?
What was really her message?
And how did voters receive it?
It was sort of like an arranged marriage where the new couple goes down for their first meeting and the entire village comes to watch.
So she had some interactions with voters, but there was this gargantuan press throng around her.
This is not.
This is exactly what I was talking about earlier when I told you to drive by.
They're not buying this.
It looked like an arranged marriage.
It's actually a good way to describe this.
You had to be there.
People were picked and chosen, and they had to go.
They had to be there.
It was not spontaneous.
None of it was.
But arranged marriage, you used that term with Mrs. Clinton in earshot, and you are taking a big risk, I would think.
Okay, let me get this Apple Watch business out of the way because I'm being peppered with many emails asking my thoughts on this.
They originally announced April 24th as the launch day for the watch, but it's been clear they don't have any.
On April 10th, they allowed people to go to stores and try them on and decide what they wanted, mix and match the different kind of cases with bands and so forth.
And they, for the longest time, said that the availability of the launch day would be April 24th.
If you order early enough online, you'll get yours delivered that day.
Became obvious that they couldn't meet that.
And a precious few will get their watches on April 24th.
The vast majority of people who ordered the first six hours of availability will not see their watches until June.
So obviously they're having mass production problems.
That's one thing.
And I don't know.
I mean, I just know what I read.
And therefore, I don't know anything.
If what I read is wrong, then we're all misinformed.
But apparently, they're having trouble with the screen.
The screen is very small.
It's a new kind of display that they have never manufactured before.
It's not the kind they use in iPhones or iPads.
And they're having trouble maintaining color purity.
And then there's something called a taptic engine that taps your skin to reflect your heartbeat.
Or if you're to turn left, if you're walking someplace and the map is on with directions, a left part of your wrist will tap the right part.
They're having trouble with that engine.
They're having trouble mass producing these components.
I don't think they have any.
But the real problem, I think, is something that's happening.
Steve Jobs never did this.
While people cannot get their watches, people who want to order them are told never, mind, you're not going to see one until June or July.
People that did order being told the same thing.
Meanwhile, they're giving them away.
They're giving away the $10,000,000, $15,000, $20,000 watches to rappers and designers.
The other day, Carl Lagerfeld, this designer, got his gold watch with a $25,000 band, and he took a picture of it.
And it was clear that he doesn't even know what he's got.
The launch screen was what was on the face of the watch.
He hadn't even paired it with his phone.
He had no idea what he had.
Now, you can say what you want about jobs, and people say, well, Steve Jobs would have never done this.
In this case, celebrities never got early releases of iPhones or I've never.
No, when it was released is when everybody had their first crack at it.
Now, to give these things away, the top-end watches, to give them away, it'd be one thing if you could go in the store and buy one today, but to give them away to people when you can't even get one, I can't help but think that's not helping them.
They think it's going to celebrities wearing them, it's going to entice people to go buy them.
It may eventually.
But I think that's right now a bit of a PR problem.
Basically, however, folks, a mass production problem.
That's what I think.
And eventually they'll get it figured out.
Say guy says to me, Apple's blowing it because they're not catering to their core customers.
Not necessarily true here when it comes to the watch.
Hang in there, be tough, folks.
▲
Export Selection