All Episodes
Previous Next
March 11, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:51
March 11, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 247 podcast.
Yeah, yeah, I think I'm gonna have to do that.
I'm gonna have to go back to the nineties and explain a lot of things.
In order to understand what's going on with Hillary Clinton today, you have to understand what happened in the nineties.
And what I mean by that, folks, in order to understand what the media is doing today with Hillary, we're gonna have to go back and revisit the nineties.
But don't worry.
It's gonna be fun.
It's gonna be some great memories revived from the grooveyard that many people have forgotten.
Anyway, great to have you here, Rush Limbaugh back at it on Hump Day.
Telephone number at the EIB Network is 800 282-2882, and the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
All right, so we had the press conference.
The first thing to point out, and I folks, please do not doubt me on this.
Uh none of none of what I am going to offer in terms of analysis or explanation of Hillary Clinton is ego oriented.
It is fundamentally necessary if you want to understand, for example, the press, AP has sued.
AP is suing to get hold of her records.
Most of the drive-by media is not tolerating what she said yesterday.
Most of the drive-by media is not accepting it, and many people are mocking her and making fun of her.
Uh justifiably so.
And people are puzzled by this because the popular conception is that Hillary is the Fetacomplied Democrat nominee for 2016, the Fatacomplied next president.
People assume the media loves her.
People assume that the media can't wait for her.
People assume the media have been winding up ready to launch her, get behind her and state her good graces.
None of that appears to be true.
And it's leading to some confusion in terms of people doing analysis of this.
I mean, that press conference is an absolute disaster, folks.
That woman is not the smartest woman in America, not the smartest woman in the world.
She's not even a good liar.
And that's the difference between her and her husband, one of the many.
She evokes no sympathy.
People don't really feel sorry for her, not even the feminizes.
It's a it's a it's a strange thing.
She's she's stuck back in the 90s.
You know, I I thought yesterday, I didn't want to say it yesterday.
All during the program, but when it was announced that that press conference of hers was going to be at 2 o'clock, I told myself, and I mentioned it to snurdly, I said, there's no way that she's going to come out and do this press conference before this program ends.
It isn't gonna happen.
And I didn't tell you that, because it didn't seem relevant at the time.
It was no big deal.
What was relevant was that she did this at the UN.
And that was that was purposeful because, as we mentioned yesterday at the United Nations, you have to apply for news credentials 24 hours in advance of any event.
She didn't give them 24 hours.
So the people that were on hand, the media people on hand to query her yesterday were the UN beat reporters for all the news networks and agencies.
So it wasn't the White House crew, it wasn't the daily news crew that you're used to.
It was a bunch of people whose beat is the UN.
By definition, they were not the most up to speed on whatever this scandal involving Hillary or email is.
That was done on purpose.
And right on schedule, I mean, to the second, when this program ended, out she walked.
And that told me that this woman is in a time warp.
That this woman is stuck in the 1990s.
And I've I've been thinking uh past hour to how best to put this in all in perspective and to make the most sense out of it.
And I think it is in order to do that, I need to ask you.
Do you recall the pretty in pink press conference that Mrs. Clinton did in 1994?
It was on April 22nd, 1994.
And it was called the Pretty in Pink Press Conference because she had on a pink pantsuit.
The reason for that press conference was me.
And if you have not been listening to this program from the beginning of its well, for from the beginning, if you've not been around um, say the last if your listening doesn't go any longer back than 15 years, you don't know what I'm talking about.
And that's why it's necessary to put this in perspective.
Back in 1994, Hillary care was all the rage.
And the Clintons were just getting started on ramping it up.
There had also been already the controversies over Whitewater and what had become known as the Rose Law Firm billing records.
There had been numerous bimbo eruptions.
We had not yet had the election in 1994 that the Republicans would go on to win and retake the House of Representatives.
The Clintons were arguably still in their honeymoon, it was the second year of the administration.
But what had happened that week, prior to the Pretty and Pink press conference, there was a town hall edition of Nightline.
And everybody was in Iowa.
There was something going on in Iowa.
Ted Coppel was in Iowa, and Geneva Overholzer was on that show.
She was at the time the editor of the Des Moines Register.
She'd later go on to work at the Washington Post and in USA Today, a number of places like that.
James Carver was there.
They asked me to be on this program, and I agreed to do it.
I was the only one not in Iowa.
I did it for my TV studio on West 57th Street in New York, across the street from the CBS Broadcast Center, just to give you some perspective.
And on that program, as they began detailed discussions of Hillary care and any number of other things, when Ted Koppel came to me, I said, Ted, essentially, I mean, I'm I'm gonna have to paraphrase this.
I don't have it exactly at my fingertips when I said verbatim.
I said, Ted, uh I think it's all pretty much a waste of time.
I don't know how we can believe anything these people tell us.
I think it would be ridiculous for us to believe anything the Clinton say.
And then I went rat tat-tat.
Why?
And Carville was reduced to a mumbling failed attempt at rebuttal.
It caused a mini fire storm on the set in Iowa because I was not falling into line.
I was not discussing the topic as it is.
That's why Coppel had me on.
Back then he liked me.
And it was it it it caused the program to in a mild way of expressing it, blow up.
Because essentially what I was doing was telling everybody, you guys, this is all a bunch of hooey here.
I mean, we can't believe what they say about health care, what they say about it doesn't matter.
They haven't told the truth about a lot of things.
And I went down list by list, item by item, what they lied about.
Well, the next day, the New York Times wrote a scathing review of what had happened on Nightline the night before, which is two or three days later, she scheduled that press conference that became known as Pretty in Pink.
And she sat right under a portrait of Abraham Lincoln and sat in the chair exactly as Lincoln was posed in that portrait.
And the picture, the image, you know, honest Abe, here's here's Hillary in the pink pantsuit, and she was masterful in the press conference.
She was relaxed, she was the exact opposite of the way she was yesterday.
She was relaxed, she was in command.
My name didn't come up, don't misunderstand.
But I was the reason the whole because I had changed the direction of the the way all this was being looked at.
I had challenged their veracity and their honesty.
Remember, there's no Fox News yet.
There's barely any other talk radio.
There are no conservative blogs yet.
And so it was the Clintons, the reason why this is relevant to yesterday.
I believe Hillary Clinton stuck in the 90s in a host of ways.
And coming out at three o'clock yesterday, waiting until this program was over to do whatever she did yesterday, to me is an indication.
Because back in the 90s, that's what they did all the time.
They waited until this program was over to do anything of substance, so that I would not have immediate opportunity to come because I was the only anti-voice back then.
There was no Fox, there was no blogosphere, and there weren't any other national conservative talk shows.
I was it.
So they did everything they could.
They never did a press conference between noon and three.
They never made news between noon and three.
They always waited until after three o'clock, unless it was something unavoidable that had was international incidents, some sort of thing.
But I mean, if if if they could avoid making news between noon and three, they did.
And I think Hillary's still stuck in that mindset.
What she has forgotten is I'm when I finish at 3 o'clock, yeah, I'm through.
But the rest of the new media isn't.
It's still out there, and it pounced.
It doesn't matter when the left does things now.
They don't have to wait till three o'clock.
They still do.
In Hillary's case, and I think it's a mindset.
I think it's indicative of a mindset that she is still stuck back in the 90s in a host of ways.
And you can see it in the media coverage.
Ron Fournier and a number of other drive-bys, and snurdly will back me up on this, are writing that they don't want to go through the nineties again with the Clintons.
They just don't want to go through it.
They had to blame everything on the Republicans, they blamed everything on the media.
They never took responsibility for anything.
It was, you know, many people hearing this will be surprised in your reaction, wait a minute, wait, wait, wait a minute.
I thought the media loved the Clintons.
I thought the media loved the 90s.
I thought everybody thinks the nineties were the good old days with Clinton running the show and the economy was booming and the Republicans are getting shellacked every day, and Ken Starr was getting shellacked every day.
And here's the media writing, oh my God, they don't want to go back to the 90s.
So what's that about?
What that's about is the media doesn't like Hillary.
They like Bill.
They love Bill.
They are enamored of Bill.
But Hillary, you take her because she is with Bill.
And to the extent that you get behind and help Hillary, you're doing it because you're getting behind and helping Bill.
But if they are so behind Hillary, if they are so supportive of Hillary, how the hell did Obama beat her?
You realize the first opportunity the Democrat Party had, and the first opportunity many of the media had to abandon her, they took it in 2008.
And I think what we're seeing in some of the post-press conference coverage yesterday from a lot of media that were that were reporting back in the 90s.
I mean, some of those people are still around, most of them are.
They are all in one way or another, lamenting, oh, we don't want to go back to the nineties.
And this press conference yesterday reminded them of what the nineties was.
That it was the Clintons lying every day.
And it was the Clintons blaming the Republicans every day, and the Clintons stonewalling and blaming the media every day and so forth.
And they just, they're writing that they don't want to go through that again.
Hillary Clinton, uh, ladies and gentlemen, is, and I'm I'm kind of sorry to say this, as you know, I tried to keep her campaign alive in 2008 when all of her supposed media buddies and party officials abandoned her, and make no mistake they did.
And what do you think's going on now?
Why do you think all this has come up?
They don't want her now, folks.
They want somebody who won Elizabeth Warren, they want somebody else, but that's why this is coming up now.
And that's why so many in the media seemingly are lining up in unsympathetic ways.
They didn't want her in 08, and they don't want her now, which I know violates every tenet of conventional wisdom, but it is what it is.
It's right in front of our face.
Hillary Clinton is the most cheated on woman in America.
I don't care how you slice it.
Now you can interpret that as a criticism.
You can think of it as uh as kind, unkind Or what have you, but I'm sorry in just her relationship with her husband alone, it's true.
But then look at all the other betrayal that she has had to put up with.
This 2008 campaign.
Remember what that was.
In her mind, that was her turn now.
She had done her duty.
She had backed her husband through all of his scandals.
She had given up her life, essentially, given up her own career to marry him, move to Arkansas.
There's no worse place to go, maybe, other than Oklahoma or Alabama.
If you're at Wellesley, and if you're in the Northeast, and if you're if you're in line to become something big in the New York, Washington, Boston Axis, and all of a sudden you end up in Arkansas.
But she did it.
And she stood behind Bill when every one of these female scandals, the bimbos that kept.
So anyway, you know this.
208 was to be her payback.
This was the party saying thank you.
First chance they got they abandoned her.
And I guess what's happening now.
There are media supporters, don't misunderstand.
There are people who are claiming that she did great yesterday, but it's not unison.
It's not a majority, and it certainly is not unanimous.
And I think this business about not wanting to have to relive the 90s is an indication these people think that she's stuck there.
She has not grown.
She has not modernized.
And this email story is all the evidence they think they need.
Some of these answers that she gave yesterday are just the idea that you need two phones for two email accounts.
I mean, look, everybody knows that's not true, but she thought she could get away with that lie.
You can have multiple accounts on a single device.
You don't have to have a separate account on a separate device.
But the fact and then some of the stories she's telling about the server.
Do you hear how she described it?
My server is secure.
It's in my home.
It's guarded by the Secret Service.
What?
The hacker is gonna break in your front door to corrupt your server?
You can have 15,000 secret service agents surrounding your server, and it can get hacked.
And these things indicate to a lot of people that she's that time has passed her by.
Tech certainly has.
And that's because in many ways she's stuck back in the night.
I think coming out at three o'clock yesterday is the greatest evidence in the world she's stuck back in the 90s.
I could take it as a compliment.
I'm not looking at it that way.
I'm analyzing it in a whole different way.
We're gonna get a nuts and bolts of what she said in the press conference as well, and some of the contradictions and the attitude.
Charlie Hurt had a piece at the Washington Times in which do we really want, do we really want another ten years of the woman scorned as our leader?
And it's a great way to put it.
She's where she is because she's been so scorned and so mistreated.
Now it's payback time, time to be nice to the girl.
No qualifications, no real reason for her to be president, other than we owe her.
And she plays that victim card well, and people are getting tired of it, I think.
That's yeah, yeah, yeah.
I'm aware of that flag burning thing on it, uh, UC Irvine.
I'm also aware that there was not a single American flag on display Sunday in some.
Not one, not one American flag anywhere to be seen.
Last Sunday in film.
So they not only cropped George W. Bush out, there weren't any flags.
Listen to Mrs. Clinton from the Pretty in Pink press conference.
This is April 22nd, 1994.
It says two days after that nightline episode that I was describing, just two days.
Because I basically said, Ted, why should we believe them about anything?
What what the details of her health care program are irrelevant to me.
Why should we believe them?
And as usual, nobody had planned that or contemplated that, so it took off.
Anyway, question from a reporter.
You were reported to have opposed a special prosecutor, some of the release of tax documents on the base of privacy.
You felt you had a right to privacy, Mrs. Clinton.
Do you think that that helped to create any impression that you were trying to hide something?
It's the same thing with this woman, always.
And here's what she said.
You're right.
I've always believed in a in a zone of privacy.
And I told a friend uh the other day that I feel after resisting for a long time, I've been rezoned, you know, and I uh I now have a much better appreciation of what's expected and not only what I have done, because I am extremely comfortable and confident about everything that I have done, but about my ability to communicate that clearly and to give the um information that you all need.
See, nothing changes, and the media knows it.
That was about turning ten grand into a hundred grand in the cattle futures market.
That's what that question was about.
How did you do that?
Do you think maybe you should have been up front and forthcoming and tell people how you did it?
Yeah, looking back on it, I zone a privacy, but I've learned.
She has the same old readings.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Meeting and exceeding and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
Let's listen to a couple of excerpts from Mrs. Clinton's uh press conference.
Uh no, no, no, no, wait.
I just saw the call snerdly put up there on line four.
Let me take this.
This is uh interesting take if I'm reading it right.
Were you ready to go to the phones in there?
You got the cool.
Here's Paul in Greensboro, Georgia.
Paul, welcome to the program, sir.
Great to have you.
Rush, thank you very much for taking my call.
You bet.
Hey, hey, Rush, you know, I heard the uh I heard Hillary yesterday.
Yeah.
Uh, and her uh she was very adamant about not turning over the server.
Right.
I'm of the opinion that she's actually baiting the Republicans to go after that server, and then after six months or perhaps a year, you'll get a hold of it, and lo and behold, everything will be gone.
That's could that could possibly have been damaging.
And and I think it's a strategy on her part.
One of the things I've learned about her is that she is shrewd.
And I think she was very deliberate about the way she said she's not turning it over.
I think ultimately she believes she will.
But interestingly, about a year from now we'll be right in the middle of the election, and you can imagine the papers coming across with uh big headlines that Hillary's claim.
Well, look, I don't I I I do not blame you for thinking that in this mess the Republicans could end up being blamed.
And I do not blame you for thinking in this mess that the Republicans are the target for more ridicule.
But I don't think that's what's going on here.
Uh because I don't think the Republicans are behind this.
And I I don't I don't think I I think the Republicans are going to be hands off.
Uh I don't think the Republicans are going to go there because the Republicans don't want to irritate the independents.
And the Republicans think that criticizing any Democrat, first African American president or a female Secretary of State, that's war on women, I think they'll shut up and let this play out.
They've got their own presidential campaign revving up now, uh, focusing on that.
The real um impetus is not the word I'm looking for.
But but I I think Clinton, Hillary's real enemies on this are on the Democrat side.
She has she has, in the estimation of many legal beagles, she's committed felonies here.
I mean, there are State Department forms that people leaving the State Department.
I've just seen one.
You have to fill it out.
You have to promise this and that has happened, and you've given up your records.
You know, threatening to to to never let go of this server because all that's on it is yoga and uh emails back and forth to uh Chelsea uh about her wedding and so I can understand how you think that'd be a rope a dope uh kind of thing.
I I think there's more than that on the server that she doesn't want people to see.
It's the sole reason that she set it up is to be able to keep things uh from anybody's eyes.
I and I think largely she was doing this to to to shield herself from Obama.
I think no mistake.
There's no love lost between the Obamas and the Clintons.
Now you say, well, then why did he make her Secretary of State?
Well, it's the old saw about keeping your friends close to your enemies closer.
If you put her in the regime and she accepts, she almost has to be loyal.
She almost has to.
I mean, it should be very difficult for her to start sabotaging the president from inside.
So I think there's all kinds of reasons what may they cover up the fact that there's real animosity between these people.
But this campaign in 2008, that was that was brutal within its own parameters.
And it was not kumbaya when it was all over, and let's uh let's hunker down and be friends again.
There's still a lot of real animosity.
Hillary was owed that.
That was hers.
And now 2016 is supposedly hers.
And the same thing is starting to unfold again right before our very eyes.
What was hers is now they're already making a move taken away from her.
And the point of playing the soundbite from the Pretty and Pink press conference back in 2000, back in 1994, was to show she hasn't changed.
She is still she's paranoid.
She thinks everybody's out to get her.
And just because you're paranoid doesn't make you wrong.
And I think she's more concerned about Obama and Valerie Jarrett and the Democrats than she is about the Republicans.
They're the ones that can do her damage.
They are the ones that could deny her the nomination.
They are the ones that can pull the rug out from under her.
And she didn't want to give them any ammo whatsoever.
So hello, secret server, secret emails, separate rules, even though she knew what the rules were because she was making sure everybody else in the State Department abided by them.
Let's go to some audio sound bites.
This is at the United Nations.
Hillary's talking about the uh scandal involving her emails is listen to this.
I opted for convenience to use my personal email account, which was allowed by the State Department because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of two.
Looking back, it would have been better if I simply used a second email account and carried a second phone.
So she said the main reason for the email address in the server was because she wanted to use one device and not two, which of course is absurd.
You can have multiple accounts on one device.
You can, besides the rules for a device, I there's so much tech here that clearly she doesn't know.
But then I don't know how much other people know.
But the the the rules for what's going to happen to your emails on your phone or on your iPad, in 99% of the cases are established on your server or on your email program.
That kind of flexibility on a handheld device is not built into it because it would eat up the battery.
It would cause, it would require too much processing power, and that would really shrink battery life.
So email on a device is a slave to the server that delivers it and stores it.
Uh particularly in her case, if you have uh if you set up to use IMAP accounts, and everybody's everything stays on the server.
And what ends up on your device is determined by what rules you have set up on the servers.
There's any number of ways that Mrs. Clinton could have been legal.
There's any number of ways that anybody in IT could have made this legal on one device.
There's any number of ways that personal and professional would have been separated.
You can set up all kinds of rules to send mail from certain email addresses to this folder, that folder, and she, if she doesn't know this, her IT people do.
The point is, she didn't she didn't take any of these steps because her express purpose was to hide it all.
So now the next thing she's done, okay, I want my emails read.
I have instructed the State Department to distribute my email.
You know what she did?
And I frankly don't think she has the knowledge to figure this out either.
She's being advised on this.
The first thing she did said, I've got uh 60,000 emails, but only half of them are relevant, and I'm the one to decide.
No, she's not.
She doesn't get to determine which of her emails are private and which are official government business.
She's not the arbiter.
There is an archivist, in this case at the State Department that does that.
And that's why everything by law and by rule should go on the State Department servers.
So what Mrs. Clinton did, first thing she did was to decide which of the 60,000 that we're talking about were personal, and she kept them on the server, and I'm not giving you the server.
I'm not releasing the server.
It's personal, it's mine, and you're not entitled.
And I've decided it's all personal, nobody gets a chance to see.
The other half of them, 30,000, she printed.
She had them, she doesn't do anything.
She had them printed and had the paper, the dead tree versions of her emails delivered to the State Department.
You realize, sure you do, the near impossibility of searching hard copy emails.
You can't keyword search them.
You can't name search them unless somebody digitally rescans them.
And they would have to use OCR.
You can't, you can't make PDF copies out of every page and have the at some point you're gonna have to do optical character recognition to make that stuff searchable.
It's a nightmare.
And she's done this to delay and to obfuscate and to make sure that people can't find out what's in those emails or can't make any connection to anything based on what she released.
This is this is a pure out and out falsehood, series of falsehoods and obstacles that she's put while she goes out there and tries to make it look like, oh, I didn't know.
And you know, I didn't, two devices and I didn't mold.
I should have had a second this to make it simpler and so forth.
But you know, I just want to it's the same old technique, the lovable, likable Hillary bumbling around here doing her best, but don't doubt she's just just trust me.
Trust us, we're the Clintons, you can believe us.
And this is what the media that is revving up against her is fed up with.
Because they know they can't trust them.
If this were Bill, it'd be a whole different story.
If Bill were in this mess, that's another thing.
She's out there saying, well, some of these emails that I'm keeping were to my husband.
Really?
Well, her husband has said that he's only sent two emails in his life.
He doesn't do email.
There are a lot of people that don't do email for this very reason.
They don't want to establish this kind of searchable trail.
And Clinton's announced he's only sent two emails, and he didn't do it.
Somebody else did it for him.
But here's Hillary out there saying that, well, somebody's private emails, it's yoga.
And that's another thing.
Yoga, are we really supposed to sit here and look and see what we see in the yoga is taking place here?
But the instant messages, now that's a whole different ballgame.
Now, if you want to start talking Hillary's, now that, okay, so what's she using?
Okay, she had an iPhone, so she loves Apple Press.
She's obviously using iMessage.
Well, I'm sorry, I don't care if she's got 15 personal servers, those messages, she doesn't have control over.
They are on Apple servers.
The problem is they're encrypted, and the CIA can't even unlock them.
But if you're talking about instant messages, now that's a different thing in email.
She doesn't control the content of the instant message.
That's another reason why to not give up the server.
But the the the messages, she's using BlackBerry BBM, that's on Blackberry servers.
If she's using AOL, instant message, that's on AOL servers.
If she's using WhatsApp, if she's using iChat, if she any number of these, she does not have her own message service.
You can get your own email domain, and you can control it with your own server, where you hit delete and it's really gone.
But there's another thing about that.
And she does know this because she referenced this.
You can have your private Server all day long.
And you can delete every email that you have received, and you can delete every email that you have sent from your server.
However, the person to whom you have sent email maintains a record of everything you sent.
And you can't when you delete your sent email from your server, you are not deleting it from the server of the recipient.
So the emails that Hillary did send to people about Gubman business, like other people in the State Department, anybody with a.gov email address.
Those still exist.
And they exist on government servers.
If she's emailing with other people, say uh have an iCloud.com account.
They're on Apple servers.
Just because you delete what you send, you you can't recall an email that you've sent and delete it from the recipient.
And the recipient, nine out of ten people, 99 out of 100, do not have their own servers.
You could, by the way.
People have been emailing.
What is a server?
What do I have to do?
Folks, you you can make a server out of any computer from for all intents and purposes.
If you want to, you can have your own server in your own house.
But you'll have to go get your own email domain, which means you're going to have to buy a domain.
It's not that expensive, but you're you become the administrator.
You operate the program, you have to become proficient in maintaining the email program.
It's not the program that's on your computer.
It's a it's a it's a whole different ball of email's a complicated thing.
And it takes an IT specialist to install it and maintain it.
Hillary wouldn't have the slightest idea.
Most people wouldn't, but you could do it too.
I mean, you can you can create a server out of a Mac Mini, which is the size of a hockey puck.
Just however many external hard drives you need to store the data that you accumulate and that you receive.
But anybody can have their own server, and you can put it in your house, you can put it in a storage thing, put it anywhere.
But it's it's having your own email domain.
You have to pick one that you a lot of them are bought up, like we bought up, um, we bought up Drive by Media.
Uh every derivative of that for our use, just to keep other people from having it.
And depending on who owns them, uh, it's uh it's a negotiating practice.
So but that's what you'd have to do.
Then you'd have to get your own administrative email program, your own server software, you have to learn how to operate it.
Uh and you'd have to go spam filters and any number of things that the providers do for you that you never see, you'd have to do for yourself.
And it would give you the privacy that you want, but it would give you all kinds of new time requirements you would have to spend on uh keeping it up and running.
And when it goes down, guess what?
You have to fix it.
Or you have to hire somebody to come in and fix it.
And the minute you do that, the minute you hire somebody else, then you got to wonder, okay, are they mirroring your server on theirs?
Because they know all about tech and you don't.
So are you really private?
I mean, there's snakes in the grass everywhere out there, folks.
And the more high profile you are, the more delicious your data is.
So it's something you could do if you wanted to.
It's not even that cost prohibitive, but it's uh it does carry with it its own responsibilities and time constraints, consumption requirements, and this kind of thing.
Uh Mrs. Clinton said two devices, but and she should have used two, but she decided to use one.
But just a few weeks ago, she admitted that she had two phones.
Yesterday she said she only had one.
I should have had two, it would have made it a lot easier.
Well, just February 24th, Santa Clara, California question uh with Kara Swisher at Recode.
Ask the big question.
Okay.
iPhone or Android.
iPhone.
Okay, in full disclosure, Blackberry.
And a Blackberry.
She has both.
iPhone, you hear that laugh.
That's the Arkansas Broadbeam that is found in the wild of Arkansas, and it's migrated to the East Coast.
It's found often in Washington and New York.
Hillary sounds just like it.
It's incredible.
And listen to this yesterday afternoon from her UN press conference.
The server contains uh personal communications from my husband and me.
And um I believe I have met all of my responsibilities, and the server um will remain uh private.
Yeah, right.
She's reading from notes.
She doesn't even know what she's talking about.
Her husband sent her two emails, folks.
There are not a bunch of emails.
▲
Export Selection