All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 21, 2015 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
January 21, 2015, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hi folks, welcome back.
It's great to have you here.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I am America's real anchor man, America's truth detector and doctor of democracy.
All in one harmless, lovable little fuzzball bundle.
800 282-2882 and the email address, L Rushball at EIBNet.com.
Here's another thing about this State of the Union thing.
I'm going to move on here in just a second.
But I didn't watch it last night.
If uh you didn't hear the first hour, and I'm this the first you're hearing of it.
I just couldn't bring myself to do it.
I knew what was going to happen.
I knew the attitude.
I know I was going to end up being insulted as a conservative.
I was going to be lied to.
And I just didn't feel like coming in here and giving you uh the equivalent of an oral final exam, meaning verbal report on it.
You know, can I tell you what's telling about this?
Remember the buildup to this thing yesterday?
And the day before.
And last week, the drive-bys had been breathlessly anticipating last night's State of the Union address for days.
And they have been trying to get everybody hyped up for it.
Oh, and it's going to be so revelatory.
It's going to be so important, so meaningful Obama is going to announce the next Santa Claus list and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
It was hailed, promoted as one of the most important states of the union ever.
It was going to be comprehensive.
All of this hype, all of this.
Focus on it.
You know what the most telling thing about Obama's speech is that after today, we will not hear another word about it ever.
Even though yesterday and the day before, and in the weekend in the Sunday shows, and even into last Friday.
Even with all of that, it was the it was the lead topic.
About 75% of the news sites, New York Times, Washington Post, Politico, that's all there was.
The State of the Union.
That's all it was.
There was nothing else going on.
There was a countdown clock on CNN, probably.
We had pre-analysis.
We had post-analysis.
We had post post analysis.
We had post-analysis post.
We just devoted everything to it.
And in a couple of hours, not another word will ever be said about it.
Which to me is the classic example of Bardaman Bailey con man hype and ratcheting up people's emotions to a fevered pitch.
Speaking of that, somebody, an academy voter, has written a piece in the Hollywood Reporter magazine explaining why Selma didn't get any nominations.
And there are two reasons.
And the first one was what uh I and many others considered to be relevant, and that is they just didn't get enough screeners out.
They didn't get enough DVDs to the academy to see the damn thing.
Most of the academy voters, it's beneath them to go to a theater because the Hoy Paloi is in there.
So they watch these nominated movies on DVDs that are produced by the studios and they're sent around.
And apparently there were not very many for Selma.
But the second reason is the guy actually says, I can't remember his name right now.
Let me get it in a minute.
Never heard of him, doesn't matter.
But he claims to have been an academy voter in good standing.
He says, we get race fatigue out here.
That's what he racial fatigue.
If it's not 12 years a slave, it's Django Unchained.
If it isn't Django Unchained, it's uh driving Miss Daisy.
If it isn't this, and he admits this.
He says, look at we've only, these are my words, not his, but what he means is our emotional reservoirs are only so deep.
There's only so much caring about this anybody has.
And after a while, you're out.
Well, that's me on the State of the Union.
There's only so much you can care about.
It's only so much passion, care, concern you can invest in it, and I've given the State of the Union everything I've got.
And the tank was empty last night.
Well, well, it, yeah, it used to be fun political theater.
It to me, I remember one time uh within the first four years of the program.
You know, when it was all new, and the drive-bys didn't know what to make of me, they'd never heard of me, they didn't know who I was, but it was big, and they didn't understand it.
To them, I didn't come from any of the acceptable places.
I didn't have an Ivy League education.
Uh, I didn't know anybody that they knew inside the beltway.
I mean, I just popped up out of nowhere, and as such was a huge curiosity item.
And in those days, this would be the Clinton years, the Washington Post, I think two or three years in a row sent a reporter to the studio to report for three hours my take on the Clinton State of the Union for like two, I think maybe three years in a row.
Some of them would send camera crews in.
Because it was all so new to them.
And after one of these um uh events after a State of the Union, after my show after a State of the Union, a Washington Post Info Bay that was a reporterette.
She wanted to interview me after the show, to which I said, What more do you need to hear?
I just did three hours on this.
Well, I need to ask you, okay.
And she said, Boy, do you just act like this is the most fun in the world?
You just I said, No, you're misinterpreting.
This is the hardest work in the world.
What do you mean?
I said, This is like an oral final exam here.
I got a president making a speech, chock full of BS last night.
I got an audience expecting me in less than 10 hours to break it all down and tell them the total truth about it.
I got you here watching writing about it.
This is high pressure, ma'am.
This is big time pressure.
Did you ever have to do an oral final exam in journalism school?
Uh no.
Well, I have to do one every day here.
And my audience is the class, and I'm not the professor.
They are.
They're the ones that hand out the grades, and I'm the one that has to get the good ones or I'm out.
Well, you mean it's work?
Yes, it's it's hard work.
I got a president can't tell the truth.
I got you facilitating his lies, you and all his buddies, your buddies, and I've got to sit here, and my audience has these high expectations.
I'm going to tell them the truth about this.
So, yeah, it was fun in that sense, it was fun as political theater.
Uh, but there was also a time where the substance of the damn thing mattered.
It wasn't that long ago that when a president showed up to State of the Union, he actually spent some time on the State of the Union, not just an opening sentence, I am here to report to you tonight that the state of our union is firm and strong, except for the bulls in New England.
And then they would move on into their wish list.
There used to be a time when we'd actually get a report on the State of the Union.
But when these speeches began to be, when I you might even be able to trace this back to Nixon.
But if not Nixon, would it have been?
They became Christmas lists.
They became the speech became just a series of empty promises.
And as such, the substance vanished.
And it didn't even matter whether any of it was ever going to happen, whether Congress is going to most of it never happened because Congress really doesn't take up all that much.
Well, well, uh, I don't know.
You know, Nixon had his his laundry.
Reagan's State of the Union addresses were Reagan's State of the Union, he would call the uh the freedom fighters in Nicaragua the uh moral equivalent of our founding fathers, and that ticked off the media.
And he would re would talk about defeating the Soviet Union.
It was serious stuff.
Reagan didn't do gift lists of what he was going to give everybody, food stamp increases, free community college.
Uh oh, yeah, when he announced uh strategic defense initiative, SDI Star Wars.
Oh, They had a cow.
The point is there are days in the past where the State of the Union was actually a substantive thing.
And something that you could learn from this, this was just political theater complete with a fraudulent hard luck story.
This this I I don't think we can spend enough time on this.
But I did in the first hour, so I'm not going to go through it here again, but just a fraudulent hard luck story, a former Democrat staffer sitting in hallowed ground next to Michelle Obama, total fake.
And if her story was real, again, I want to reiterate if her hard luck story is real, if she did have to come up from nothing and was eating and swallowing dirt every day, let's not forget who she was working for.
She said, Working for Patty Murray.
She said Democrat campaign staffer.
They must not pay their people very much.
And their benefit package must be pretty bad if the woman was suffering like that to qualify as a hard luck success story because of Obama's reach out to the middle class.
in the way the national football league has a problem people are laughing about this deflate gate thing up in new england but it's a problem it's a problem because of the integrity of the game And that is something that the league cannot be flippant or frivolous about.
They've now they've learned, and I guess they've known for a while, that 11 of the 12 footballs used by the Patriots were minimum two pounds under inflated.
And it's they they left, they left the officials two and a half hours for the game, the reps get the balls and they inspect them, and they left the officials in perfect condition.
And then they're taken to the ball boys.
Ball boys are employees of the teams.
So the ball boy on the Patriots side and on the visiting team, in the case of the Colts.
They're not employees of the league.
The ball boys aren't.
Okay, when did this happen?
If they left the officials in perfect condition, when did and who did it, they end up being deflated by two pounds each.
That's why New England won.
That's not the point.
The Colts were not going to win this game, no matter what the pressure was in the balls.
And the league knows that.
This is about the integrity of the game.
The ball has specific rule requirements, and they were tampered with.
And now all kinds of stuff is coming out of the woodwork.
Do you remember a quarterback named Brad Johnson?
He's a quarterback for your team, the pay uh the uh the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and I think a Minnesota Vikings.
Do you know what he had?
Oh, okay, yeah, Big D went to Florida State.
Big whoop.
Anyway, do you know what he admitted?
Have you heard what he admitted?
He they played Tampa Bay, played Oakland, the Super Bowl when Gruden was coaching Tampa Bay.
Rich Gannon was a quarterback for the Raiders.
Brad Johnson has admitted that he paid $7,500 to people on the day of the game to scuff up the footballs and to make them feel more comfortable in his hands.
Something like a hundred footballs on Super Bowl Sunday.
This guy has come out and admitted that he paid 7,500.
Now, in his case, he's saying he was paying 7,500 to make the balls normal.
He wanted the balls to be normal.
In other words, what he's implying is that he had to pay $7,500 to make sure the balls ended up as they should be and not tampered with.
Because remember, it was the Raiders who lead the league in allegations about deflated footballs and muddy spots on the field and all that.
And now other players are coming forward with other examples of playing With properly improperly inflated footballs.
And it's kind of cascading now.
And it's laughable because of balls and the male anatomy, and it's ripe with joke opportunity after joke opportunity.
But then you add to it, it's the Patriots.
And back in the Patriots era, you've got Spygate, and you've got where they were legitimately found to be violating rules, and the coach was fined a half million dollars, and the team fined 250,000.
And now people all over the league, well, not all over the league, but uh a lot of people are coming forth admitting that this kind of thing has gone on for a long time, but 11 out of 12 balls were tampered with.
And then you add to that, Tom Brady got soundbite back in 2011, said he prefers underinflated balls.
Well, he got 11 out of 12 of them last Sunday night.
So as far as the league's concerned, it's an integrity of the game issue that they do have to deal with here.
The minute the minute that there is a even slightly serious opportunity for people to start doubting the integrity of the outcome of these games, then the NFL has a huge, huge problem.
And that's why there's so much attention being uh paid to this, even though in the most recent instance it wouldn't have mattered to Hill the Beans if they were playing tennis balls.
The Colts weren't going to win.
You could have filled those footballs with Calfart methane gas, and it wouldn't have mattered.
And by the way, that would have helped global warming, but a Patriots could have done that, maybe helped themselves.
As football thing, it it still remains an item of interest to a lot of people because there's some things about it that are not understood.
The thing one of the most obvious questions I get is, well, wait a minute, rush, rush, rush, rush.
If the balls were deflated, okay, fine, the balls are deflated.
Well, how is that help New England and hurt the Colts?
I mean, how can a deflated ball be said to hurt one team and help another team?
That's a great question.
The answer to the question is each team brings its own footballs to every game.
The visiting team brings 12, the home team provides 12, then there's the home team provides another 12 as backup, and then there are special balls for the kicking game that are only used during field goals, extra points, and punts.
Therefore, the Colts, when are on offense, do not play with the same footballs the Patriots are playing with.
So if the Patriots, and 11 of those 12 balls were deflated, and we got the quarterback there saying he prefers deflated balls, easier to grip, particularly in wind, rain, and all that.
So if the Patriots' balls are made more comfortable for their quarterback, but the Colts do not alter their balls, then I mean, fill in the blank.
There is said to be an unfair advantage.
The only reason this happened was because a guy named DeQuell Jackson of the Coats, as Phil Sims says, intercepted Brady.
That's the first time the Colts had their hands on a New England ball in the whole game, intercepted Brady, and he said the ball felt different.
So he took the ball to the sideline, he gave it to the equipment people there and the head coach, and they took it to their general manager and executive staff, and then they did with it whatever they want.
But that's that's how it was learned it.
There might have been the second that in fact there was a game, there was a ball thrown out of the game by the referees.
When New England had the ball, there was a ball thrown out because it was underinflated.
But if the Colts had not entered coats, some sort of the coach is Phil Simpson.
If the Coats had not intercepted Brady, they might never have known.
And nobody's accusing the balls that the Indianapolis Coats were using of being underinflated.
Only the balls the Patriots were using.
So the balls are not mixed.
The offenses do not use balls from the same stash.
And that is why uh there could be said, it could be said there's a competitive advantage.
Grab some by 24 very quickly.
This is Brady.
This is November 14th.
He has a weekly appearance on a radio station in Boston.
And you got a question.
Don't you spike the ball?
When you score?
Yeah, which happens like once every three years.
When Gronk scores is like eight touchdowns a year, he spikes the ball and he deflates the ball, which I love that because I like, you know, the deflated ball.
Okay, so that's three years ago.
Brady happens, I like the deflated ball.
Okay, fine.
And then nobody's thought a thing of it.
Common.
I mean, football is uh quarterbacks, the bigger the hand, the better.
I mean, it one of one of the most important aspects being quarterbacks is being able to the pump fake.
And to do pump fake, mean fake throwing the football.
I mean, not you got to make it look like you're really heaving the ball, but you can hold on to it and tuck it back.
You need huge hands for that.
And if your hands are not big enough, you need some way to hold on to the ball easier.
You don't want to be fumbling it when you do a funk uh pump fake.
So anyway, here you have Brady innocently saying three years ago, yeah, yeah, yeah.
I like the deflated ball.
Fast forward to Sunday, 11 of 12 balls.
In by the way, wind and rain were found to be under inflated.
And the league has no choice.
The penalty for this, by the way, the best I've been able to determine if they are able to prove guilt.
The perpetrator is fined $25,000.
Which is chump change.
Maybe loss of uh draft picks.
Okay, here's what happens.
Two hours and 15 minutes before kickoff, every football that's going to be used in the game is taken to the officials.
The kicking footballs, the 12 footballs in the visiting team, the 12 footballs in the home team, and the 12 backup balls.
They're all taken to the officials.
The officials then inspect them.
They weigh them, they check air pressure, and make sure that they're not scuffed and all that sort of thing.
They give them to the ball boys.
These are the guys you see throwing the ball to the refs from the sideline after every play.
The ball's replaced frequently in the NFL.
As much as for anything, is this time is 25 seconds between play or 40 25 seconds play clock.
So they've got they've got to get a new ball in there.
If the pass goes out of bounds and uh way down, they just throw a new ball in.
The ball boys get the balls after the referees have inspected them and given their stamp of approval.
The ball boys, each team has one, and they are team employees.
So in this case, we assume that the balls in New England passed inspection by the referees.
Two hours and 15 minutes before the game.
Then the refs give them to the ball boys, and that's the last the refs see of them, other than when the game starts and they're touching them, putting them in play, taking them out of play, or whatever.
The ball boys, important to note, are employees of each team.
They're not employees of the league.
So here's what happened.
If we're to believe what we've been told, two hours 50 minutes before the game, the referees inspected the balls and found them to be perfectly fine.
At some point after that, 11 out of 12 balls used by the Patriots were underinflated.
Now you might say, well, it was cold and rainy, and maybe they just lost air pressure on their own.
Yeah, maybe one or two, but 11 out of 12.
So the league is trying to find chain of custody.
What the hell happened?
Who had these things?
Who could have done it and not be seen doing it?
Cameras are everywhere.
So, but for them, it is an integrity of the game issue.
They they they just they cannot have these kinds of questions unanswered in a satisfactory way.
Uh this is this is the product.
And the epitome, the essence of fairness, and all that sort of stuff uh is important in terms of public perception.
But the things that are now being learned, like Brad Johnson paying $7,500 to make sure the balls were in normal shape.
Anyway, I gotta get to the phones here, folks.
It's been a while.
We're starting Denver.
This is Joe.
Thank you for waving, Joe.
Really appreciate it.
Great to have you on the show.
Bucket list kiddos.
I cannot believe I am talking to you.
Dream come to a rush.
Well, thank you.
I really appreciate that.
I'm glad you got through here.
Well, let me tell you, the the Bush tax cuts back in 2006 made college 529 plans totally tax exempt.
So long as you put the money in, it grew tax exempt, you take that money out, you pay for your kids' college, it was tax exempt.
Now Barack Obama wants to get rid of that Bush tax cut for the middle class.
And when you take that 529 money out, that's how he's going to pay for community colleges.
It's buried in the plan.
Forbes has an article about it, and I just can't believe that he sat there saying this is for the middle class when he's lying and taking away this tax exemption from the middle class.
It just blows my mind.
I know, doesn't it?
That's my whole point.
You know, Fox just got through running a package.
They did men on the street interviews.
And guess you know what the subject of it was?
How the rich aren't paying their fair share has resurfaced all of a sudden now as a cultural curiosity in America.
And so there they are out of the street, man on the street interviews.
Do you think the rich aren't paying their fair share?
Where did that come from?
Last night.
That all comes from the fact that Obama claims the rich aren't paying their fair share.
We've got to raise taxes on the rich, and so a whole brand new narrative is born.
The rich aren't paying their fair share.
And it's been recycled.
This is a fifth or sixth time in the last 27 years this has happened.
Now your example stuff of the middle class who needs to just cut the taxes for my boss so he can employ more people.
Precisely.
But it's worse than that.
Because the community college, as you have just illustrated, for a lot of people is not going to be free.
They're actually going to end up paying for it.
But even the people, it's not free.
Somebody's paying for this.
Somebody, a lot of people are going to be paying.
Here's what's really worse.
You and I saw something the other day, I don't think I printed this out because I was in a mad dash in a hurry.
I can find it if I have to.
That would not be a problem.
I believed it too, because of things I'm learning with the Rush Revere books that I'm writing.
I and you might have seen this yourself, Snerdley, in your uh daily dalliance with show prep.
That the first two years of college have declined so much that they're now the equivalent of what a high school education that a high school diploma ten years ago is now what you get after two years of college.
Well, I'm sorry for that.
That is a huge decline in education achievement.
That is that is going backwards.
It you know used to be that a high school diploma was an embarrassing.
If that's all you had, you might have had a problem.
And you had to have at least some college to have some sort of respectability.
But now, education has been so watered down.
And by the way, what's watering it down?
Political correctness and appeasing the slowest learners and appeasing the lowest IQ students in the class.
We can't humiliate them.
We can't have uh smarter or or faster learning students uh maintain their pace because that's not fair to those who don't learn as fast.
So we are defining educational standards down.
You've gotten to the point now where the first two years of college used to be what you came out of high school with.
And now you throw this whole free community college thing in there.
Why does why is that even an issue?
You know why that's an issue?
Is because college itself, not junior college, but major institution of higher learning college, the tuition is exorbitant.
The tuition, you we're getting to the point we need education care to send kids to college, much like you need health care to go to the doctor.
It's it's flat out absurd.
And you'll note The president never, never chastises big education, never demands they lower prices.
The president of the Democrat Party will chastise Walmart all day long, and they'll chastise Exxon Mobile all day long.
And they'll get all over the cable companies, and they'll get all over the uh telephone company.
I mean, they're just their enemies' list is one industry and drugs pharmaceutical, but big education can raise their prices.
It doesn't matter how much.
And all we get is Obama and the Democrats launching new programs, student loans, student list, free community college, in order for people to be able to access it and afford it.
And why is this the case?
Because the Citadel of Education is where the American left is.
They own it.
And there's not going to be a serious move at reducing salaries for these professors, these communists and socialists that are teaching your kids.
There won't be one.
And that's why there's not going to be any serious alteration to what's happening in college athletics because of the money.
And so now this whole push for community college, part of it is that the four-year cup, people can't afford it.
And so it's another giveaway, and it's another way for the Democrats to try to make the little guy think that it's the Democrats looking out for him.
It's the Democrats and their policies which are destroying all of these long-held traditions and institutions that people thought were tantamount to being part of the American dream.
And now they're out of reach for more and more Americans.
And the Democrats come, doesn't matter.
We're going to give it to you.
But they're not.
Somebody's paying for it.
And I'll take a quick time out.
I appreciate the call, Joe, very much.
Don't go away, folks.
Much more straight ahead.
We're back.
Great to have you, Rush Limbaugh on the EIB network.
I went, I got this Forbes article that Joe in Denver was talking about.
This is this is classic.
Joe was exactly right.
Let me read you some excerpts.
The Forbes article is entitled Obama's New State of the Union Tax Hike on Middle Class 529 College Sabres.
Here's a little bit from the article.
One tax hike in particular was very odd since it's aimed almost exclusively at middle class families with kids.
The exact demographics that the goodies in the tax plan is targeted.
This is written post-speech.
And the author of the story is this tax increase that Obama proposed last night is really odd since it's aimed at middle class families with kids who've set aside money for college.
The levy in question would increase taxes on college savings accounts, known as 529 plans, after their section in the Internal Revenue Code.
Now, by definition, these accounts are really only used by middle class families.
And here's the money quote for the piece.
But there it is, buried on page nine of the league document.
The president's plan will roll back expanded tax cuts for 529 education savings plans that were enacted in 2001 for new contributions.
It's a Bush plan, and what it's it's essentially an education savings plan, much the same way that health savings accounts have been talked about.
Parents, and obviously this is for middle class families, could set aside a certain amount of money, because it's kind of like a 401k, except it's exclusively for use in college and junior college tuition.
So a family can set aside money in the 529 account.
And it's tax-free.
But the money has to be used when it's withdrawn for tuition.
If you withdraw it and use it for anything else, then you pay a penalty, like an early withdrawal from your 401k.
And Obama's eliminating that as part of his free community college.
He's eliminating the 529.
He's eliminating the opportunity for the middle class to set aside tuition money tax-free under the guise of providing free junior college tuition.
So, Another thing watering down education standards, no core curriculum, no requirements.
So Joe was calling to say, what the heck is this?
Here's a plan that was set up, and people have put money in it, and you take it off the top of your income so it's not taxed, and it goes into this account for your kids' education, and if you use it for that, then fine.
If you withdraw it early or use it for something other than education, then you have to pay the tax on it.
Program's going to be destroyed.
Or eliminated.
And it was a tax cut for the middle class.
The president is eliminating essentially a tax cut for the middle class.
All the while claiming he's raising taxes on the rich.
I'm sorry, if you eliminate a tax cut, you are raising taxes.
And it's not a semantics argument.
It's legitimate.
Here's Alex in West Wareheim, Massachusetts.
Alex, glad you called, sir.
Hi.
Mega Ditto's Rush.
A long time listener back to your early California days.
Wow.
Great to have you still with us.
Huh.
Say again.
I'm glad to have you still with us.
Yes, I am still with you.
My point on the football inflation, a couple of points.
One is I think we sh should by regulation lower the pressure on cold days.
The fans like to see an exciting game.
They don't like to see the ball being dropped every uh five minutes.
And uh if it was the same regulation for everybody, it would not be an advantage to one team or the other, it would simply make the game more exciting.
Well, I don't problem with that.
I'm I'm not aware that a properly inflated ball provides an impediment in cold weather, but I guess somebody could make the case that it could.
Well, that's what they've been trying to say.
The other thing is Wait, wait, wait, wait, who's been saying what?
Somebody's been saying the Patriots deflated a ball because they get an advantage in cold weather.
I believe they claimed that the Patriots would have an advantage by having a deflated ball.
It was known that the weather was cold.
Maybe uh I didn't maybe nobody was saying because of, but there is a relationship between temperature and pressure in a football.
Well, this is true.
This is true.
But I I didn't know if anybody made that specific.
I mean, we know that the quarterback has said he likes deflated balls because it's easier to grip, but theoretically easier to grip and throw on wet or cold days.
Well, if everybody likes it better, I think it's worth a big thing.
But they see they don't.
Aaron Rodgers has said he likes an over-inflated ball.
He likes a ball that's got a couple pounds additional pressure in it.
The harder the better for him.
You see, every quarterback's different, everybody quarterback's got different tastes.
And the kickers, they got have you ever seen um you've ever paid attention?
Kickoff.
Any kickoff, but particularly the first one, the kicker will grab the ball and just be pounding it into the ground and squeezing it, bending it, it's shaping because it's a brand new ball.
K-balls are brand new balls.
They're just out of the box that day.
And these kickers are trying to limber them up.
They're trying to soften them up because you get more compression on the ball, the softer it is, more compression, and the more it's gonna take off the foot.
This is somewhat of it works the same way.
All depends on speed, though.
Um, in a golf ball, the compression coming off the driver, depending on how hard the golf ball is.
If you've got a if you've got a great swing speed, you've got 120 mile an hour swing speed, then you want a high compression golf ball.
If you've got a low swing speed, you want a low compression ball.
Everybody's different, is the point.
So that's why they've got this standard.
The standard is a two-pound range.
And I think it's 12.5 to 14 a pound, uh, 14 and a half pounds per square inch.
Maybe it's 13 and a half to 15 and a half, but there's there's a two-pound window that's supposed to accommodate legality and uh and individual tastes.
Anyway, I appreciate the call out there, Alex.
We have take another obscene profit break, folks.
We'll do it right now.
Ladies and gentlemen, you want to hide the women and children for the next item coming up on the program, and you might even require a barf bag for it.
Just trying to give you ample warning.
Uh, because our purpose here is not to shock, and our purpose here is not to offend.
So we give you ample time to uh shield yourself and protect yourself from the grittier, seedier parts of life that we may on occasion discuss.
Stand by, be right back.
▲
Export Selection