All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 18, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:26
December 18, 2014, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Look, I don't care how you slice it, folks.
The number one takeaway in all of this is that the United States government is kowtowing to regimes who are either dictators, thugs, or who hold America to blame, responsible for their plight and the plight of poor people the world over.
This is inarguable.
This is, I mean, Obama propping up Cuba, Obama, look, who he chooses sides with uh in the Middle East, everybody but our ally.
Uh there I don't think this is even arguable.
I think it's it's clear that that Barack Obama, with all of his apologies that he's made to countries around the world clearly believes, because he's been raised this way.
It's the way he was educated.
The United States has been the problem.
For whatever reason, uh our prosperity was ill-gotten, um our racist heritage uh stole Mexico, stole land from the Native Americans.
Well, this is how these people are educated.
And it's been two generations of people now that have been educated in this way of thinking, and they're old enough now to run for office, be elected to positions of great power and high authority, and they are now in positions of implementing these convoluted, perverted beliefs.
And they're turning out more and more of them at American institutions of so-called higher learning.
But there can be no other characterization here that in relaxing our economic uh blockade, to use Castro's word, on Cuba, we are propping up a dictatorship in the Caribbean.
We are propping up a communist regime.
Now, some people want to say, well, Rush, this just proves that 53 years of sanctions didn't work.
Okay, then let's take the sanctions off of Iran.
Okay, let's lift them.
They don't work.
Let's get the sanctions uh who else we sanction them?
Russia.
Let's get the sanctions, let's lift them.
They don't work.
Let's take what we've learned here, 53 years of failure in Cuba, then what are we messing around with in Iran for?
Well, I mean, let's at least be intellectually consistent.
If sanctions don't work, if the embargo doesn't work.
And by the way, how do you define working?
What was the purpose of the embargo?
It had, I think, multi-intentions.
But more than anything else, it was a statement of American values.
And if you want to claim that one of the objectives of the embargo was to harm Cuba economically, then, well, go for it.
Whether that's a factor or not, the U.S. embargo did not cause the Castro brothers to change their behavior toward their people.
They in fact used the embargo as an excuse, told their people, well, yeah, things would be different here, but the evil Satan to the North is denying us equal free to whatever he tells his people.
It was our fault.
But the purpose of it was not to harm the Cuban people, it was to limit the power and reach of the Cuban regime.
Any number of ways of determining whether or not it worked, but as a statement of American values, we are not going to openly trade with a nation that, by the way, was about to accept delivery of nuclear missiles that would be aimed at us.
It was a Soviet Union client state.
There's a lot of things about this that people of a certain age simply don't know.
You think Cuban missile crisis.
How do you think the Cuban Missile Crisis is taught in uh in schools today?
It'd be interesting to know how the Cuban missile crisis is.
We bullied Russia, bullied Cuba, or whatever, or it's probably our fault, because you know, if so the one of the things that's taught about about Castro and Cuba is that it was almost a bidding process.
Back in 1955, 56, 57, Castro was deciding which way he wanted to go.
He was either going to align with America and be a capitalist country, or he's going to align with the Soviets and be a communist country.
And he would come to the United Nations, and I remember, I mean, I'm seven or eight years old.
I remember this like it was yesterday.
I remember watching Castro on TV.
And I, and I can remember, I can remember the news that Douglas Edwards, CBS News, and Walter Cronkite.
You could I just I remember them hoping and praying Castro would choose us.
Even back then, hoping and praying.
But they were all convinced that he wasn't.
But Castro left it open.
It was a possibility he was going to choose to align with us.
And then when he aligned with the Soviet Union, oh, it was a letdown.
It was a terrible disappointment.
And it was portrayed as Castro spurning the U.S. And of course, even back then, Castro was justified in spurning us because Castro was smart enough to know that we really wanted to secretly overthrow him.
The point is that it's always been our fault.
So the Cuban missile crisis is an outgrowth of that.
Some Castro trying to defend himself, I mean, for crying out loud.
Yeah, it was well yeah, but see, in the in the at the time it was Kennedy, and at the time it was Candilot, and at the time Kennedy was the hero.
But I to the it's probably popularly well known by now that that Kennedy nearly blew it in the Cuban Missile Crisis.
And the and well, maybe not.
Maybe not.
Maybe maybe I'm a s well the old movies do.
I'm just but the the Cuban Missile Crisis as it is, as it is taught today.
I'm I'm let's take it away.
Let's stop talking about it as specific.
What we're left with is that in the American education system, more often than not, any conflict involving the United States is our fault to one degree or another, and therefore the behavior of the bad guys is justifiably explained by virtue of our overreach or whatever we're blamed for.
My only point is that two generations of young people have been brought up and educated this way.
Did now they're citing the godfather to me to prove my point.
See, this this is another thing that happens.
We we all cite, yeah, and you should see I'm telling you the truth because it was in the Godfather.
The Godfather's a movie.
It was a script.
Somebody wrote a script.
Right.
Well, the mafia did take over.
The mafia owned Cuba for a while, and but Castro portrayed as the good guy kicking them out.
For the people.
Oh, yeah.
Uh there's all kinds of those.
So the takeaway is that we've now elected somebody that's been educated to believe all this stuff, that the U.S. is the problem in the world.
And there are people, and I know them.
There are people very happy because they think the lifting of the embargo was a very humanitarian, because they believe it's our fault.
The Cuban suffering is our fault.
They eagerly eagerly support lifting the embargo or normalizing relations.
Because it allows them to continue this illusion that they too are humanitarian, and they too are good people.
They recognize suffering and they know who's responsible for it.
And here comes Obama saving the day for the suffering once again by realizing the U.S. was out of place and wrong in invoking the embargo in the first place.
And it's just obviously not healthy for a growing percentage of the population to think its own country is the problem in the world.
And I'm not talking about being nationalistic to the point of forgiving and ignoring occasions when America makes mistakes.
But these people don't, there's no forgiveness whatsoever.
America must be perfect, and if it makes a mistake, then it must pay the price in in ways that are very punitive to America.
There are other things out there too, and I've got some audio sound bites to back all of this up.
And I want to start getting your phone calls in on this.
But one thing, we've talked yesterday, this nothing to do with anything that we've discussed so far.
But yesterday we made mention of the fact that Barack Obama was running around talking about the fact that one time, that time long ago, he was insulted, and somebody thought he was a valet.
Not when he was president.
Over seven years ago, somebody thought he was a valet, and that meant the United States was racist.
That meant that he had a legitimate chip on his shoulder.
And then his wife was running around saying, Yeah, I went into Target, and I was first lady.
Now I was in disguise, but I went into Target if somebody asked me to get something off a top shelf.
And that was supposed to be racist because that meant that the person at Target thought that she was an employee, a grunt employee, and for only one reason that she was black.
And so that was used to tell us that our country is still racist when even the first lady and the president are insulted with racist comments.
Don't tell us that Barack's election means anything, was the point of that.
So let me ask a question.
If I call Michael Jordan and say, hey, man, could you show me how to can you show me how to make a jump shot?
Am I racist?
Is that racist if I call MJ and say I need some help with my jump shot?
It's not.
It's not insulting him because he's black.
I mean, I I just, well, I could just as easily call Kiki Van Daway and ask him, but no, I'm calling MJ.
Is that not racist?
If I want MJ to show me how to make a jump shot.
Well, then how come Obama gets away with saying it's racist?
Somebody asked him to be thinks he's a valet.
Anyway, there's there's a little news here on the on the Mrs. Obama aspect of this.
And it comes from our buddies at Truthrevolt.com.
Wednesday, People Magazine released an interview with President Obama and Michelle My Bell Obama, in which the two discussed their harrowing experiences with racism.
And among those dire experiences was a shocking incident during Michelle Obama's undercover trip to Target.
She said, I tell this story, I mean, even as the first lady during that wonderfully publicized trip I took to Target, not highly disguised.
The only person that came up to me in the store was a woman who asked me to help her take something off a shelf.
Because she didn't see me as the first lady.
She saw me as the help.
She saw me as someone who could help her.
Those kinds of things happen in life, so it isn't anything new.
From that, we're supposed to believe that America is so rotten, discriminatory that asking a black woman in Target to help get you something off the shelf is racist.
Because it means that every American thinks that every black is nothing more than an average minimum wage store clerk.
But do you know she told this same story two years ago?
In an entirely different way on Letterman.
Same story, same event.
Here's how she's described it on Letterman.
I thought I was undercover.
I have to tell you something about this trip, though.
No one knew that I was me because a woman actually walked up to me, right?
I was in the detergent aisle.
And she said, I kid you not, she said, excuse me, I have to ask you something.
And I thought, oh, cover's blown.
And she said, can you reach on that shelf and hand me the detergent?
I kid you not.
And the only thing she said, I reached up because she was short, and I reached up and I pulled it down.
She said, Well, you didn't have to make it look so easy.
That was my interaction, and I felt so good.
She had no idea who I was.
I thought as soon as she walked up, I was with my assistant, and I said, This is it, it's over.
We're gonna have to leave because I've been spotted.
But she just needed detergent.
So two years ago, it was a charming and funny event where a woman needed the assistance of a tall person to read something from a high shelf.
But today the same story is racism.
And this another example of how it's done.
This this spreading of guilt, making things up, structuring them as you go to achieve the desired result that you want.
And it's just I think it's obviously beneath these people to engage in this kind of thing, but it illustrates for us who they are and what they're really intending to do and what their what their base manner of thinking is.
And there's I mean, this is this to tell this story in a different way uh recently, people magazine is a country still around how does that advance anything?
How does that what what how does that help a thing?
Particularly when that was not her original interpretation of the event.
Anyway, break time and we'll get to your phone calls when we come back, my friend.
Sit tight, much more straight ahead.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network.
Here is Greg in Lule, Kentucky.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
Good to talk to you.
I appreciate your patience and waiting to appear on the program, Greg.
Oh, it's always worth it.
Um I wanted to say I I think I disagree with you about Cuba.
I think that's exactly the right way.
Uh look look at the history we see the Soviet Union is gone, it's no longer communist.
Eastern Europe is no longer communist.
China's not killing 40 million people like they did in their mao anymore.
It's a much freer society, still got a long way to go, but it's much freer than it used to be because of of of the trade and exchange that we've had with the West.
The two communist countries that are not free and are still holding on are North Korea and Cuba.
They remember the Berlin law was enough to keep people in, not keep people out.
So I think openness and exchange and free trade and travel is going to be more to destroy the castor regime than anything else.
Well, uh okay.
Well then I we let's just be patient and we'll see.
Fidel's gonna die at some point if he's still alive.
He's still gonna die at some point.
So we can't credit the lifting of the embargo for that when that happens because he's been sick for a I don't I don't I don't think that's but I think I think eventually that will happen.
But but I'm saying the best way to uh to expose the people of Cuba and to open up the society is to have an open exchange.
Right.
And have people uh travel there, travel here.
Yeah, that's broadcast the internet open up and they're gonna open up the internet to some extent.
Right.
And they will get some free ideas exchanging.
That that's a good thing.
That's what we believe in.
I thought it's freedom, we believe in liberty and spring.
Do you think the Cuban people are not aware of what they're being denied?
Well, yeah, they are aware, and they're getting more aware.
There'll be a lot more aware of it when the internet is no longer censored in the way it is, and it'll get more broadcasts, and absolutely, and the more they know There will be.
There are gonna be more broadcasts.
Yeah, the more there's gonna be more freedom and exchange of information.
That's the point.
Travel, back and forth travel.
And I think that's incredible.
At the end of the day's back and forth travels happening now.
Cuban uh r families, they can get travel permits, and they can even send dollars down there, and that's been the case for decade now.
But the more the merrier.
The more that happens, the better off we are.
The more we can travel back and forth, the more we expose them to freedom.
You know, a slave society can't compete with a free society.
There's no way if you have an open exchange.
I think that I think we can lead by example.
I I think it's a good thing.
I don't know why Obama did it.
Maybe he did it for the wrong reason.
I don't know.
But I think it's I think it's let's face it, the reason for decades this has been that way is because the electoral vote to Florida.
We all know that.
What's the difference between Soviet Union and Cuba?
I mean, come on.
Uh what we're losing.
What's the difference between the Soviet Union and Cuba?
Yeah, why would we trade with the Soviet Union?
You could travel the Soviet Union.
Why would we trade with East Germany?
Uh well, we would trade with China, but not Cuba.
There's no rational distinction between those places.
It's it's all American politics in Florida.
Would you agree?
Um well no, I'm I'm not sure that your assumptions are correct here.
I think we didn't openly trade with the Soviet Union.
A lot more than the same.
Now things got into the Soviet Union a black market.
Um there were things like videotapes of the T V series Dallas was one thing.
And and believe it or not, TV commercials for the Levi's, because the Soviet people were lied to by Soviet leaders.
And the United States was portrayed the way the Soviet Union really was.
And then people saw evidence of it, but not because there was open and free trade between the two countries.
We were doing our best to undermine them with people in a clandestine services working very hard to do it.
Now, your better argument would be North Vietnam.
If you if you wanted to cite, I mean, there's a communist country that we lost a war to, arguably, and we did open economic trade relations with them.
However, they are still communists.
And their people are still poor.
But Westerners can't go there.
China would be another if you want if you wanted to argue with this way, you can say that free trade with China, but the Chicons still have a vice-like control over their people.
But they're not the way they're not killing 50 million people the way that it doesn't a moo is the point I'm making.
It's improved.
I'm not saying it's a pretty good thing.
There are political, religious prisoners in droves in China.
It just isn't, it just isn't reported.
Look, I know your your your thought on this.
I've had people express it to me before.
You're not totally wet.
You know you can make book on it, folks.
You can make book on it.
Obama does a typically dumb, dangerous thing.
Shortly followed by Mr. Snerdley finding a caller claiming to be a super conservative, saying, you know what?
This is my work on.
I think openness and free trade.
We gotta give it some time.
I think this is how we spread freedom around.
We did free trade.
We have people open up and they see how great things are in America and it's a great move.
And then they call back and two years later and apologize being wrong.
We always seem to find those guys.
Now, you should have seen my email after after I raised the question of how is the Cuban Missile Crisis taught in the public school system today.
Well, I got email after email.
Come on, Rush, don't be silly.
JFK's the biggest hero.
He's still a god.
The Cuban Missile Crisis, it doesn't matter what it is.
If it's JFK, he's brilliant, he's the best, he's great, it's Camelot.
Not true anymore, folks.
This is my point.
I'm going to hit right here on the details in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
*gunshot*
And it's a story from the New York Times from November 11th last year, 2013.
Textbooks reassess Kennedy putting Camelot under siege.
A 1975 Haskrill text by Clarence Versteag and Richard Hofstadter said that in his handling of the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis.
Quote, Kennedy's true nature as a statesman became fully apparent in A People and a Nation, their book.
They said his 1963 limited nuclear test ban treaty was the greatest single step toward peace since the beginning of the Cold War.
Okay, that was for all intents and purposes, the way Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis were portrayed as recently as 1975.
But using the same title in 1982, Mary Beth Norton and several other textbook writers took a very different approach in a college textbook widely used today, still to this day in advanced placement courses.
They said, Mary Beth Norton and several others, they said that Kennedy pursued civil rights with a notable lack of vigor.
They blamed Kennedy for the missile crisis, saying that Cuban Soviet fears of invasion were stoked By Kennedy's Bay of Pigs landing in 1961 and other U.S. moves against Cuba sponsored by Kennedy.
And they said that Kennedy's real legacy was a quote, huge military expansion that helped gold the Russians into an accelerated arms race.
So in advanced placement courses in American universities, from 1985 on, Kennedy is blamed for the missile crisis.
Kennedy is blamed for the Soviet arms buildup because of his numerous efforts, starting with the Bay of Pigs to invade Cuba.
So this is what I, my instincts, I never doubt my instincts.
And this is, I just, it, I don't know if I'm going to take the time to defend Kennedy, but my point is that it's changed.
That everywhere it's America's fault, even to the point of having to blame JFK if the if the textbook writers, if the educators at the curriculum determiners are so hellbent on blaming America, they will even lump JFK in.
Now is the that's how pervasive the blame America crowd is.
That's how deep their tentacles spread throughout education now.
And you can't believe it.
You sit in there, I can say you can't believe that anywhere in America, JFK would be blamed for anything.
Much less the Cuban Missile Crisis.
And since 1985 in college advanced placement textbooks, according to a New York Times story last November, right here, that's the truth.
In 1985, folks, we're talking 30 years ago.
That's a generation of people coming out of college who believe that I'm telling you, this this this notion that America is the problem in the world is widespread among educated elites.
Educated elites end up where?
They end up in government bureaucracies.
They run for office.
They end up on Wall Street.
They end up CEOs.
They end up in a number of influential places.
Marco Rubio.
They're not in reaction to our last caller who thinks that lifting the embargo is going to...
And by the way, Rand Paul has come out in support of it.
Well, I'm just telling you, Rand Paul has distanced himself.
Once I think once Rand Paul saw saw Jeb come out against this, this is Republican presidential politics.
Rand Paul's, aha!
I got an opportunity here to stake out a different position than Jeb.
So I think that's what that is about.
I'm not saying that Rand Paul doesn't really mean it.
I'm just saying, okay, so Jeb's come out against the embargo or the normalization.
Uh the embargo being lifted, so Rand Paul, aha.
I can go someplace that Jeb isn't.
Which is uh an attractive thing.
Marco Rubio said that a top State Department official was dishonest with him about the Obama regime's plans to change its policy on Cuba, Tony Blinken and Standby Soundbites uh eight and nine.
Uh Tony Blinken, a newly confirmed deputy secretary of state told Rubio at his confirmation hearing uh last month that the regime would not unilaterally change its Cuba policy without full consultation with Congress.
So this newly confirmed Deputy Secretary of State during his confirmation hearings promised Rubio and the people in the Cuba, oh no, no, no.
We would never unilaterally change our policy with Cuba, not without consulting you first, Senator.
And of course, the consultation didn't happen.
They lied again.
Rubio's out telling me, telling the story.
Blinken was confirmed by the Senate Tuesday.
Blinken gets confirmed and Obama makes the move.
Rubio told a weekly stand-up he was dishonest with us.
He was clearly evasive.
And it was on Wednesday after Blinken is confirmed on Tuesday that Obama announces the move on Cuba.
Here are the audio sound bites, November 19, 2014, then there is Senate Committee on Foreign Relations hearing on the Blinken nomination of Deputy Secretary of State.
Rubio said, Do you anticipate uh during the rest of the president's term that there'll be any unilateral change or any change in U.S. sanctions or conditions against Cuba, absent Cuba meeting any conditions of democracy, human rights, so forth, the things outlined in that legislation.
Anything that in the future might be done on Cuba would be done in full consultation with the real meaning of the word consultation that I just alluded to with this committee.
Well, it was the real well, he lied.
But here, this is typical liberal qualification.
Well, anything that in the future might be done in Cuba would be done in full consultation.
With the real meaning of the word consultation that I just alluded to with this committee.
So I guess he's got a different definition of consultation.
Consultation is Obama will consult with himself and decide to do it, and that means they've consulted.
But Rubio's on point is lied to.
This guy lied, and he was confirmed Tuesday, and then Wednesday lifts him.
Then Rubio Rubio said next, okay.
Look, there's been some chatter, and I understand some of it's just chatter as happens in this town.
I understand there's been some chatter that somehow over the next couple of years, at the end of his term, President Obama may seek to make some changes with Cuba, perhaps even unilaterally towards U.S. sanctions and policy in Cuba.
Is that being contemplated right now, Mr. Blinken?
Is that being contemplated?
Absent real Democrat opening?
So let me translate.
Rubio says to me, okay, you say you will not unilaterally change anything in Cuba policy without consulting us.
Okay, how about the next two years?
Are you going to are there any plans to normalize relations with Cuba without requiring Cuba to make any concessions?
Are you planning on doing anything in the next two years?
It depends on Cuba and the actions that they take.
And what we've seen, as I just alluded to, are actions in exactly the wrong direction.
The detentions, the harassment.
They talk about wanting to improve relations.
I have not heard you say point blank that absent democratic openings, we're not going to see actions on the part of this administration to weaken the current embargo and sanctions against Cuba.
Unless Cuba is able to demonstrate that it is taking a meaningful steps to move forward.
That's just last month, folks.
That's just last month.
Now, what step did Cuba take?
Well, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, hung on.
There's been a prisoner exchange here.
We got back our guy, Gross.
And by the way, Gross was being tortured.
This gross guy lost in five years like a hundred pounds, and uh I blinded he lost teeth blind in one eye.
But there's a picture, you may have seen this by now, depending on how much you surf the web.
There's a picture of Gross in his lawyer's office upon arriving home from Cuba.
His is law is a picture in his in his lawyer's office.
He's there with a babe and and uh two people in the lawyer's office and and and gross, and look they're pouring over documents and doing things that make it look official.
And right there on the wall, in the lawyer's office is a picture of Shea Guevara.
In Gross's lawyer's office.
Now, Shea Guevara is only a mass murderer, but he's a hip mass murderer because he looks cool and hip.
He wore the rebel hat and had the beard and he'd look good in a bond movie.
He's just perfect.
Hollywood loves Shagueira, mass murderer.
An enforcer for Castro.
And he's held in honor.
In the uh in the office of this gross guy's law firm.
What would a program on embargoes and foreign policy and all that be without John Kerry being part of it, folks?
A um haughty John Kerry who once served in Vietnam.
He held a press conference yesterday in Washington and had this to say about uh the new policy at Cuba.
There is no other country in the world to which we have Closed our lives for as long as we have closed them to Cuba.
See?
The Berlin Wall fell 25 years ago.
Right.
And the wall separating Americans and Cubans has yet to come down.
Oh, yeah.
Not only is this policy failed to advance America's goals.
It has actually isolated the United States instead of isolating Cuba.
Did you hear that?
So we have just had the U.S. embargo made morally equivalent with a Berlin wall.
This is how these people think, folks.
The Berlin Wall was built to keep people from escaping a communist regime.
And the U.S. embargo has just been compared to that by John Kerry, who served in Vietnam.
And the U.S. embargo did the exact same thing that the Berlin Wall did.
It closed off and isolated the United States.
It didn't isolate Cuba, it isolated us.
So our embargo only hurt us because so much that Cuba has to offer was denied us.
It is convoluted, perverted thinking, but it it stands as dominant reason with uh with this crowd.
Here's Sylvia in Miami.
Hi, Sylvia, I'm glad you called.
It's great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi there, and I'm very, very sad by what's happened here.
And I just can't believe the way that these elected officials are talking about an issue that obviously they know nothing about.
They're being very naive, or they finally joined the rest of the world in making it about making money and not about helping the people in Cuba.
Well, yeah, that's probably true.
I I think this crowd uh is very obviously blames America for the plight of the Cuban people.
That's what John Kerry just said, and your your take on it is uh I think pretty right on in that regard.
That's the that we are hurting the Cuban people.
Absolutely, and I wanted to say something yesterday when I was hearing the president talk about, you know, we've been doing this for 50 something years.
Actuality, Cuba does not have an embargo in the sense of a worldwide embargo.
When apartheid ended in South Africa, you know what happened there?
We ain't gonna place some city happen there, where the world got together and said there's no way we're giving them a dime.
Right.
As long as they're oppression going on with the people.
That never happened in Cuba.
So the only country that kind of was still making a point out of the atrocities happening in Cuba was this one.
That's another great point.
You want me explain it to you?
Please do.
Okay, because the people being oppressed in South Africa were communists.
African National Congress and Mandela's bunch, they were communists, and the South African government was not.
South African government was was suppressing and oppressing a bunch of communists.
It was intolerable.
They happen to be black.
That made it even worse.
In Cuba, the oppressors are the communists, so it's okay.
Absolutely.
Well, that that's the difference.
You wonder why is the world not joining to help liberate the people of Cuba?
Because they're not going to align against a communist lead dictatorship.
Yeah, there's not even an embarrassment.
Like when I see uh celebrities in Cuba frolicking in the sand, taking pictures, they don't even run away from the photographers.
They're happy to be there.
There's nothing wrong with us being there.
Yet, had they done that back when the part that was going on in South Africa, they would have been boycotted immediately.
And it's a shame.
I mean, I was born in this country, Mr. Cuban, and it really hurts to see how for whatever reason the plight of Cuba has never had that sex appeal where the rest of the world can join in, where I mean, yesterday I thought I was I had I didn't even know what to think when I was giving the president.
Because Castro is has always been a figure of great mystery and intrigue.
Not that people have not really had any animosity.
People you're talking about have not had any animosity toward uh toward Tward Castro.
And these these Hollywood types you're talking.
Look, it's just more of the same uh from people who believe that America is the problem.
So you go down and frolic on the beaches in Cuba, and you welcome the photographers in the paparazzi because what you're doing is thumbing your nose at America.
And that makes all the hassle worthwhile.
That's who they are.
She Guevara, you know what he did?
He made bombs out of Pinya Coladas.
I mean, how low is that?
Make a bomb out of a pinnacolada or a uh a chocolate sundae.
I saw it in a movie.
▲
Export Selection