All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 30, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:34
October 30, 2014, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of The Rush 24-7 Podcast.
And here we are, ladies and gentlemen, back at it, Rush Limbaugh, behind a golden EIB microphone and the Excellence and Broadcasting Network, broadcast excellence all yours for the next three hours.
As usual, a thrill and a delight to be with you.
Telephone number if you want to join us 800-282-288 to the email address, L Rushwo at EIB net.com.
Well, the Ebola News continues to take uh well, it's not as much front and center as it was, but it's still out there.
But I want to put that aside.
I mean, basically the nurse who said hell you with you and then went out for a bike ride.
Uh Governor Christie got a little spat with a uh with a heckler uh again one week before, but never mind.
And then we've got uh uh the drive-by's making a big deal about that.
Uh the president redefining American exceptionalism by how willing we are to keep our borders open for Ebola patience.
And uh you know the drill.
What's I think probably of more value at this time is to examine the drive-bys and the way they are reporting various aspects of the upcoming election next week.
We know I could probably fill, not going to, because I'm not caught up in conspiracy theories, but I could probably spend the first hour of this program detailing all of the alleged voter fraud that's going on out there.
James O'Keefe has another video, Project Veritas, showing just how easy it is for vote fraud to take place, for illegals to vote, for unregistered people to vote.
It's everywhere.
Uh the question is how new is it?
I mean, we've always had voter fraud, but the question here is how widespread is it over what it normally is, and is it uh is there enough of it going on to have a significant impact?
And this is what nobody ever really knows uh beforehand.
We also have you know, some fun cultural stuff.
A video has gone viral out there on YouTube and all of her social media.
A woman who obviously thinks herself attractive, otherwise why do this, dressed herself up in some uh how look, uh help me describe this.
She she wore a black t-shirt, right?
But but would you say the jeans the snug.
Okay, we we will we won't say tight fit.
We'll say the jeans are snug.
It's in New York City, so everything's black.
Every woman in New York City always leaves in black, so the soot doesn't show up.
Well, that's the first thing I noticed after moving there.
Everybody walking around.
It's just it's amazing.
Leggings, jeans, whatever, black, head to toe.
So anyway, the woman is walking and uh the the put together, what is this a four-minute?
It's a four-minute video that consolidates ten hours of her walking through the city in which she documents the uh the the way men treat her, with cat calls and uh mild intimidation.
And the point of it all is to show how uncomfortable, nervous, maybe even dangerous it is for women to be walking the streets of Manhattan because of all of the things men do when a woman goes walking by.
And I watched this video.
I watched this video after hearing about it a lot.
Now you know what it's like when I first saw The Exorcist, I saw it two months after everybody else had seen it.
And I walked into that theater expecting to run out of my seat in two minutes.
Everybody told me how scary it was, how gory it was, how just it was the best, it was the worst.
It was so I was prepared for the absolute scariest, more horror-packed movie I had ever seen.
And I sat there and I watched it, And when it was over, I said, what was all the hubbub about?
No, what had happened was my expectations had been ratcheted up so high that no matter what was in that movie, I was not going to be shocked.
It could not meet my expectations.
Well, the same thing happened here.
Although I haven't heard about this for two months, I heard of this for hours and hours before I watched the video.
And I came here today, and I guess I asked Snerdley, have you have you seen this video that this woman's gone viral out there?
12 million uh 12 million views or likes or whatever.
And he said, Oh, yeah, yeah.
I said, Well, what do you think about it?
And he told me what he thought.
He described it.
So I said, okay, well, and I wasn't gonna watch it.
I'm not big on internet videos.
But then I decided to watch it.
And the same thing happened.
After I I was I was expecting some real boorish sexist, dangerous.
I was expecting some real, real rotten conduct by guys, and I didn't see that.
I saw, hey, baby, looking good today, girl.
Have a good day.
How are you?
Ooh, ooh, looked and good.
Now there were a couple occasions where a guy walked with her for five minutes.
I mean, there were a couple, three things, maybe four that were that would fit the bill that would make you uncomfortable, nervous, or whatever.
Most of it was just it was men being polite.
And it was it was men uh mildly aggressive.
I can't even believe I'm you see a pretty woman, you react to it.
Hey, you're looking good today.
I mean, I don't do those kinds of things.
But but but it didn't seem intimidating to me.
Now, I'm not the woman walking along wearing snug black jeans, GoPro camera.
Well, somebody walking in front of her that had the camera, right?
See, that now that's important in this because if the people in this video could see the camera, then that changes everything.
You put a camera on a street corner, and things will happen there that never would if the camera wasn't there.
Now she used a GoPro camera.
Those are not hidden cameras.
A GoPro camera is a small camera, you can attach it to the bill of your camp or something.
I but somebody had to be walking in front of her.
And so that somebody had to have that camera now.
I don't know whether you could see the camera or not, but if these guys, if people could see the camera, they had to know what was going on.
And it will affect the way people behave.
There's just no two ways about it.
Now, I didn't read anything accompanying the video.
I didn't read into the comments or any of that.
So maybe this has been explained how she did it.
Uh, that in this case, I'm just expressing my my ignorance about it.
But I again I was struck.
I was prepared for a bunch of wolf whistles and a bunch of disrespectful comments and a bunch of put down comments about salacious invitations, if you get my drift.
And I what when it was over, I said, uh, okay, yeah, but what uh really is the big deal here.
It was not filled with that kind of behavior.
There were some examples of it.
But hey, babe, maybe that's what it is.
Maybe it's the hey babe.
And that's just that's too familiar for somebody you don't know.
But there were there were things that have a nice day, looking good, uh other comments like that.
Anyway, it's four minutes, so I can I can't play the audio from it, and I'm not gonna spend any more time on it than that, other than to just other exercise here for me in everybody building something up and then watching it.
Say, wait a minute, I was expecting much, much worse than this.
But here's the thing.
The world is a changing place, and feminism has had a profound effect on women, and it could well be that what I saw as harmless in some cases might actually be thought of by women today as deeply threatening.
Maybe you're not supposed to speak to them on the street when they're walking down the street and you walk past them.
Maybe you're not supposed to just saying anything is an intrusion in their space.
And you shouldn't do it.
Now, Snerdley, When you're walking the streets of Manhattan, do you talk to people that you don't know?
I don't either.
Do you make so that's that's another thing about this?
I'm not denying that cat calls happen.
I'm not denying all this.
But this is just more evidence of a changing culture and a change.
This woman was on CNN today describing the horrors of this.
Well, yeah, it does depend on the neighborhood.
And let well, let's yeah.
Okay, okay, okay.
I guess I should mention that.
I guess I should it does matter the neighborhood you're walking in, and just in the interests of accuracy, ladies and gentlemen, the majority of men that are portrayed in this four-minute video are African American and Hispanic.
And I thought we were supposed to celebrate diversity.
Most of them are African African American and or Hispanic.
And it's another thing.
It's she total walk time is 10 hours, and there were apparently 200.
Is that right, incidents?
Doing this, I'm reconstructing it from memory.
10 hours total walk time.
200 incidents, and that has been edited down to four hours and twenty incidents or examples.
Anyway, to the election, the New York Times is all over the place today.
The New York Times is a good place to start because it's the House organ for the Democrat Party.
And in one story in the New York Times, you find unbelievably why polls tend to undercount Democrats.
You heard me right.
Polls show that the Republicans have an advantage in the fight for control of the Senate.
They lead in enough states to win control, and they have additional opportunities in North Carolina and New Hampshire to make up for potential upsets.
As election day nears, Democrat hopes increasingly hinge on the possibility that the polls will simply prove wrong.
But that possibility is not far-fetched.
The polls have generally underestimated Democrats in recent years, and there are reasons to think it could happen again.
In 2010, the polls underestimated a Democrats in every competitive Senate race by an average of 3.1 percentage points, based on data from the Huffing and Puffington Post's pollster model.
In 2012, pre-election polls underestimated Obama in nine of the ten battleground states by an average of two points.
Now, 2010 was a massive Republican landslide.
And the New York Times is claiming Democrats were undercounted in the polls.
When's the last time you ever heard that?
When is the last time?
When was the first time?
Maybe this is the first time that you have ever heard somebody complain that the Democrat sample in any public opinion poll was underweighted.
I've never heard this before.
This is a 47 paragraph long story in the New York Times, and it is a typical absurdity.
Now the the headline and the lead that I just read you tell you practically everything you need to know about the story.
Let me summarize what I just read for you.
Democrats might not lose in the upcoming elections after all.
They might not lose.
And why is that?
Well, because the source for this proposition of Democrats are underrepresented in polls consum Pew.
And a pollster from the Pew Center for People in the Press claims that Democrats have been uncounted in polls for years.
In fact, it turns out that every poll except the Pew poll doesn't skew their polls enough for Democrats.
Never mind that in the 2012 elections, Pugh was usually ranked in the middle of the list of pollsters for accuracy.
They were not the leaders.
The New York Times And the Pew Center claim that the polls do not weigh heavy enough for young voters and Hispanics.
And even though they admit the trend is not to turn out this year in those groups.
So the New York Times is saying, if you read all 47 paragraphs, the New York Times is saying here that no matter what the outcome, the Democrats should win every election because they are not properly represented in the polls.
They're undercounted in the polls, and they're undercounted in the vote totals because they just don't turn out.
But there are more Democrats everywhere.
They don't show up, but they're there.
They don't properly represent in the polls, and some of them don't show up on election day, but the Democrats ought to win every election.
That's what this story is saying.
So the bottom line for you Democrats, you have no reason to be depressed about the latest polls.
No reason whatsoever.
These polls are rigged against you.
These polls have a stacked deck against you.
The polls taken by your own polling units are undercounting and undersampling Democrats.
And you know what that means?
It means you need to get out there.
You Democrats, you need to get out there and vote Democrat early and often.
That's what this piece is.
It's a get out the vote piece disguised as news in the New York Times with this absurd proposition that Democrats are cheated against.
That Democrats are under-sampled in polls, under counted, and basically mistreated, disrespected, and taken for granted, should win every election on just by the numbers alone.
So that's one New York Times story.
Now let's go to another one.
Let's see here.
Latino support for Democrats falls, but Democrat advantage remains.
This happens to be a pew poll.
It's just amazing.
These people are so convoluted, disorganized, and panicked that they don't know what to do.
And so they're trying to get their vote out.
They're trying to keep everybody's spirits up.
And now they're trying to claim that they are the victims of improper polling and vote fraud and voter turnout missteps that shouldn't happen because Democrat voters get depressed when they ought not to be depressed because there are enough of them to win every election every time, no matter what.
Welcome back, folks.
Rushlin bought a EIB.
Now they were a little hoarse today, screaming last night during the World Series.
What a heartbreaker.
What a heartbreaking loss for the Kansas City Royals and their fans.
And then to have the tying run in the bottom of the ninth just 90 feet away.
But then the problem, Madison Baumgarner.
I'll tell you talk, if you want to talk dynasties, what the San Francisco Giants have done is just not done in professional sports anywhere.
The last time something like this happened, three world championships in five seasons.
You'd have to go back to the 1970s in the Pittsburgh Steelers, uh, where they had four Super Bowl championships in six years or seven, something like that.
It's just incredible.
What a great story for baseball, the Kansas City Royals were this year.
But man, that's a heartbreaking.
I mean, I worked there.
I was I was involved with the Royals from 1976 to 1983, and 1976, 77, 78, every year got to the playoffs.
Every year lost in Game Five to the New York Yankees.
Every year it was the most heartbreaking thing.
1979 didn't make it.
1980 finally beat the Yankees and got to the World Series against Phillies and lost it.
And I was having flashbacks of what those three years, 76, 77, 78, were like game five, every year making the playoffs, losing to the New York Yankees and the ALCS.
And it's just uh, but it's such the first time in 29 years, such a stark turnaround.
It's an ultimate upper and a positive but a real sad disappointment for last night.
This woman, by the way, uh in the cat call video is a budding actress.
Her name is Shoshana B. Roberts.
Oh, I did find out that the camera that was used to videotape this or to tape this was hidden in a backpack in a guy walking in front of her.
So there was a guy who was walking in front of her the whole time.
I don't know whether any of the people involved happened to notice that or not.
Maybe they didn't.
If they didn't see a camera, then you can count on what happened there being genuine and real.
But on her website, she's got a website.
The woman has a website, and she describes herself uh as a 34 double D. So she uh she she can put it out there.
But that's who she is.
The uh camera hidden in the backpack on the back of a guy walking in front of her.
And ten hours, I don't know, ten straight hours, but ten total uh hours doing this.
Uh Barack Obama.
Speaking of Ebola and Ebola doctors.
Have you seen by now the uh Obama photo op with a number of doctors and nurses who have returned from Ebola countries, many of whom are still in their 21-day monitoring period?
Obama goes out of his way to shake hands with every one of them in front of the cameras.
And this just a few days after he hugged the Ebola survivor, nurse Nina Fam before the cameras in the White House.
Anyway, uh gotta take a break.
Be right back, folks.
Don't go away.
Sit tight.
And we're back.
Happy to have you here, Rush Lynn Bonnet, cutting edge of societal evolution.
As I was saying, you probably have seen the Obama photo op with the number of doctors and nurses who have returned from Ebola countries.
And many of many of those doctors are still in the uh 21-day monitoring period.
The so-called quarantine.
And in fact, Obama even went out of his way to shake hands with every one of them in front of the cameras.
And it was just a few days ago he hugged the Ebola survivor, nurse Nina Pham, just you know, before the cameras in the White House.
But what struck me about this, wasn't it, or did I imagine this?
Is this the same Obama who said when he was asked why he would why would not go down to the border back in September as he didn't do theater?
He didn't do photo ops.
That's not what he's about.
That's not what he does.
And he was not going to entertain the whole thing going to the border or going anywhere else where news is being made because he doesn't do theater.
Thing that surprised me was that the nurse, uh, Casey Florence Nightingale Hickox didn't make it to the White House with that photo op because she left her quarantine in Maine.
She's holding her own series of photo ops.
She and her boyfriend left their house in Maine to go on a bike ride in front of an amazed and fawning media.
You know, they love this woman.
Oh, they just they absolutely love this woman.
They know she's a liberal.
They know she's an Obama supporter, and uh she's just refusing to abide by the rules and conventions that society has set forth.
I mean, there were two dozen reporters there watching this woman.
And I don't know how the governor, you know, the governor of Maine thinks that she ought to be abiding by the 21-day quarantine.
But I don't know how he's ever going to be able to arrest her now.
She's not only an Ebola worker, but she rides a bicycle, and those people are untouchable.
Those people get away with anything.
And Obama's out talking about American exceptionalism and redefining it.
We've got the audio sound bites of all of this coming up.
I want to grab grab line five because Patrick and Norman, Oklahoma has a comment on Nurse Hickox.
Hey, Patrick, I'm glad you called.
Welcome to the program.
Hi, Russ.
Nice to talk with you.
Uh, thank you, sir.
I was just going to say about the nurse that is arguing about whether or not she should be quarantined.
She's just uh auditioning for her speech at the Democrat National Convention, a la Sandra Flo.
I can see that.
Auditioning for her next appearance at the Democrat National Convention.
Well, it uh could be firsthand contact with Ebola victims.
Yeah, interesting point.
Okay, back to the folks, excuse me, I am really hoarse today, and I've I'm practically shouting here, and I'm it's it's distracting to me, so I'm gonna do my mess to muddle through this.
But if if I sound distracted, it's not because I am, it's just I am being distracted by my voice, but feel like I have this constant need to clear my throat.
Anyway, New York Times Latino support for Democrats falls, but the Democrat advantage remains.
Now remember, we just had the story of the New York Times about uh the belief that the Democrats are not sampled properly in polling day.
They're just so unfair.
The polls never sample enough Democrats.
And of course, the bottom line of the story was you can win Democrats, you can win everything.
You should win every election if you would just get out and vote.
Why polls tend to undercount Democrats?
That's what this story of 47 paragraphs, New York Times, it's basically a uh uh get out the vote effort.
But the this story is Latino support for Democrats falls, but the Democrat advantage remains with Latinos, nevertheless.
And this Latino story in Democrats is all over the place.
The numbers here, 57 to 28 percent Latinos favor Democrats, but that's down from 65 to 26 percent.
35 percent in this poll say there is no difference in the parties.
Washington Post, the Hispanic vote is completely misunderstood.
And here's proof.
President Obama, the Democrats are losing ground with the Hispanics just a couple of months after Obama delayed a planned executive action that would potentially legalize millions of illegal immigrants, the vast majority of whom are Latinos.
And that delay is causing Hispanics to ditch the Democrats, right?
Well, not exactly.
A new pew Hispanic Center survey shows that contrary to popular belief, Hispanics are relatively evenly split on Obama's decision to delay the executive action until after the election.
And then they go through the vote count that I that I just uh just gave you.
And so they're trying what it it's amazing the efforts that are being taken.
Well, it's not amazing, it's just it's fun to chronicle the efforts being made in the drive-by media today to mitigate and downplay the danger that is posed to Democrats in this election cycle.
Here it is from the Hill.com.
As Democrats lose Latinos, Senate could follow, with Hispanic voters not showing up, it's looking bad for the Democrats.
Democrats have lost their grip on Hispanic voters heading into election day and in turn could lose the Senate because of them.
So this is three groups now that we have been told in the last three or four days who will be responsible for the Democrats losing if they lose.
In the first instance, the black vote wasn't gonna show up.
And if the black vote didn't show up, a Democrats are gonna lose.
And then it was the single female vote, not just in Colorado, but nationwide.
The single women female vote wasn't jazzed.
And in in fact, even in women overall, the Democrats had lost their advantage, and the Republicans had picked up a slight majority in women and maintain a huge majority in men.
So today we're told that if they lose Hispanics, it's Sayonara.
Uh the adios.
If they lose the Hispanic vote, now so three, four days in a row here.
We've intrigued to stories about how the black vote is not excited, not turning out, spells Doom for the Democrats.
The next day, women, and now today it's Hispanics.
And the Hispanic story, it's everywhere, and they're trying to, it's not as bad as it looks.
It's not as bad as it looks.
And then over here back in the New York Times, don't forget all of these polls are undercounting the Democrats.
All these polls are undersampling the Democrats.
So you Democrats, when you hear that the black vote isn't showing up, and when you hear that the uh female vote is changing, orienting itself toward Republicans, the Hispanic vote not as excited for Democrats.
Don't believe it.
Because the polls are wrong.
The polls are not accurately properly waiting and counting Democrats and all these groups.
So don't sweat it.
You should win every election.
You will win every election if you just get out and vote early and often.
This period of time, or now the last week, this is when you can.
Well, I was going to say trust.
But you can never trust what's in the media.
But this period of time what we're in now with so little time left before the election.
This is where you get the best indication of the real opinions, the real thoughts, the fears, in this case, of the drive-by media, which is just the Democrat Party.
Drive-by media is just a branch of the Democrat Party.
So it's in these news stories, if you know how to read the stitches on the fastball, know how to read between the lines, you find out what they're really afraid of.
You find out what's really keeping them up at night.
Find out what's really got them nervous.
And they're losing all of these groups.
When I say losing, they're losing their advantage.
All of these constituency groups are trending away from Democrats.
But that's not unprecedented.
That's not unprecedented.
That happens.
We've had six years of the country in the dumps.
There's no reason for anybody to be happy with the status quo, or very few people.
There's no reason for people to want more of this.
It's only common sense that even low information voters would want to change from what's going on now.
And that's what these polls all show is going to happen.
People just want to change.
Things aren't going well.
The problem with this is that these anti-Democrat votes, sadly, I'm I'm not yet convinced they're anti-liberalism votes.
And that's what really is needed.
What's needed here is these people to understand why they're voting against Democrats, what they're upset about, why this isn't working.
They need to be voting against the policies, not just voting because it's time to give somebody else a chance because these guys have had their turn.
Now we'll take it.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm looking at a uh gift in the mouth here.
We'll clearly, clearly take it.
But it's just, I keep harping on this opportunity that that exists here.
Because these these constituency groups of the Democrats are clearly unhappy.
They are not jazzed, they're not motivated.
It shouldn't take much to tell them why.
It doesn't seem like it would require a lot to tell them why they're unhappy.
And see, you're right to be unhappy.
Nobody is.
Nobody wants a country like this.
Nobody wants this much disarray, disorganization.
Nobody wants this kind of uh cloudy future.
This is not the promise of America.
This nobody wants this kind of downsizing that's taking place.
There isn't any inspiration.
There's no leadership, there's no upbeat positive message coming from anybody out there.
And so people naturally can do pessimism on their own.
Everybody knows pessimism.
Everybody knows how to be pessimistic.
Everybody knows how to be depressed.
Everybody knows how to be fatalistic.
And people are, and they're gonna take it out on next Tuesday.
They're gonna take it out again against against incumbents in more cases than not.
So it makes total sense that all this is happening.
And I watched the Democrats' efforts to mitigate it and try to limit the damage and maybe even reverse some of it.
And the one thing that I don't see in any of these news stories is anybody touting the Obama agenda.
I don't see one story reminding people, hey, you know, Obama has been pretty good.
Hey, don't believe what you hear.
Obama has been great.
I got a couple of sound bites with some people saying this.
And we'll get to those, I promise.
But I don't see in the drive-by media at large, these voters being told, hey, don't buy what you're feeling.
We got a great president.
We got great politics.
We're on the cusp of greatness.
I don't see one story telling people to vote for more of this.
What I see is the kind of stuff, frankly, that Republicans tell themselves before they're gonna lose big.
I don't trust the polls.
I don't believe the polls.
That's what the Democrats are doing now.
I'll find that sound bite on uh it's uh how great Obama.
No, no, wait a minute, man.
Maybe I got it wrong.
Yeah, I got it wrong.
It's David Aaron Miller, the Middle East scholar expert at the think tank for scholarship experts in the Middle East, whatever it is, saying no president could be great anymore.
Greatness is impossible.
And it write at Reagan wasn't even great.
It just he knew how to make people think he was.
Reagan, it's not possible to have great presidents in America because of all of the news media that's out there.
And all of the criticism and all of the catcalls and naysayers.
It's impossible to create greatness because there's just too much criticism all the time and not enough getting along out there.
So much more straight ahead.
Don't go away.
Back to the phones we go.
This is Beth in Middleburg, Virginia.
Hi, Beth.
Great to have you here.
Hello.
Hi, well, it's good to be here.
I just wanted to call because I heard you talking about the woman who's gone viral uh with her video, and I have to say I saw that the other day, and I'm sixty-two years old now, but way back when I was really, really young, I moved to New York City in 1977,
and I was from Boston, so I dressed very conservatively, and I'm a very slight build, and and I can tell you what she went through in that video that struck such a nerve because you cannot walk four blocks in any direction in any part.
Are we losing her connection?
Oh, can you hear me?
I think I lost you when you said you cannot walk in any direction, any part of any part of New York City without um exactly what happened in that video happening to any woman.
What happened in that video?
Well, it just you it's it's you know, there's times y you're nervous because someone is a very good thing.
Wait a minute strange.
Beth Beth, wait a minute.
Are you telling that happens to every woman walking?
Every single woman, every single woman.
It has nothing to do with how she's dressed or what she looks like.
There are millions of women wal I have let me tell you, I have well, I've walked a couple of feet in New York now and then.
I may have even walked a whole block once.
I don't think they'll do it to you.
No, but I didn't see it happening to any other woman is my point.
I've never seen I'm not denying that it happens.
Don't you said it happens in every woman.
If you're in midtown and people are walking quickly and they're going about their business, you're not likely to see that.
But if you're on any other part of the streets, um, you know, my roommate one morning, she came back, she was livid.
She was absolutely livid.
She went out and a guy did it to her for the millionth time, and she cross she chased him across the street.
I screaming at him.
Just how dare you talk to me?
You don't even know me.
Why would you say that to me?
And and the guy was like shaking in his boots.
But um Well then it worked out.
It's annoying.
Yeah, but it's annoying.
I mean, you know, it's very annoying.
That's tough to And it's rude.
You said earlier you have never said anything like that.
You want to know why?
Because it's rude.
No, I would never I would never, I've never wolf whistled, I've never cat commented, uh cat called or any of that.
I d I've just I I I don't do it because I think it's cheap.
I think it's I think it's objectifying women, and uh even even to the women who are who are well uh can't go there anymore.
It just I just don't do it.
I lived in Paris, France for four years.
And one day I was walking down the street and a gentleman came over to me and he said, you know, I and he said this all in French, but translated it well, he said, I am not trying to be rude, but I just want to let you know I you have lovely legs.
And I appreciated that.
Um but someone just standing there shouting things.
No.
I I don't think it has anything to do with whatever.
It's just rude.
Okay, so if it's okay for a guy of Paris to do it, no, do you with a you do it with a French accident?
You imply it as sound like Jean-Paul Belmondo, and then you apologize first.
Gee, I'm sorry to bother you, but your legs are driving me crazy.
That's okay, but hey, babe, have a nice day.
That's a nice ass you got.
That's not called for.
No, no, I'm just I'm just thinking about the humor and the futility of all this and how nothing's new.
We've been there and done that with this wolf whistle business.
It's just recycling for a younger generation now.
▲
Export Selection