All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 6, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:49
October 6, 2014, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm sorry, I don't know what to tell you.
If I knew what to tell you, I'd tell you.
I just don't know what it means.
And there's no way of knowing what it means.
I've too often I have I have said that poll is crazy.
The last time that I have thrown out poll results to my regret was the two 2012 presidential race.
I thought there's no way Romney was down six or eight points.
I thought those polls had to be full of it.
I thought they were using an incorrect turnout sample, and those polls are right on the money.
So I don't think it's a safe bet to just reject polls that apparently don't make sense to you.
Well, no, it just it it I'm I'm being flooded with emails from people who are in a not a panic, but I mean they're curious.
Oh, yes, so we have this polling data out here.
Uh voter opposition Obama at 16-year high.
I mean, these are people it's a Gallup poll, and these are people who say specifically that the reason they're gonna vote is to register opposition to Obama's policies.
It's a record high for that poll in Gallup.
I mean, and it's a big number.
It's huge.
The number of people who who say in a poll, the reason they're gonna vote is to send a message to Obama that they hate what the hell he's doing.
Okay, so there's that.
And then over here in North Carolina, this this Kay Hagen, I gotta be very careful here.
But that's one example where she's leading.
NBC has a polls.
She's ahead of Tom Tillis.
It doesn't make any sense.
People, well, Rush, what does this mean?
I don't know, folks.
My it in the past, my instinctive reaction would be that the polls have been doctored to keep you dispirited, to keep you depressed, uh, and and to counter what the drive-by's and their polling units know is gonna be a bad year for Democrats.
But as I say, the last time that I actually thought that was the 2012 presidential polls, and I was dead wrong.
Now, tell you the mistake I made, by the way, welcome back.
Great to have you.
El Rushville here at 800-282-2882.
I was looking at the 2010 midterms, which was the closest election to 2012, and I was thinking, why in the world are the pollsters not using that as a model?
Because that was a Tea Party turnout.
It was an anti-Obamacare turnout.
And the pollsters all said because a presidential turnout is different from a midterm, it doesn't matter what's happening in the midterm.
And you've got to compare polls from 2008 to 2012, not 2010.
You have to have a poll that's got the same turnout size, same basic makeup.
And the polls that did that show an Obama win by anywhere from four to eight points.
And I was stubbornly stuck here thinking, how in the world can there be a tr a 2010 turnout that gave the Republicans the House that lifted the Tea Party to vast stages of relevance, be ignored.
And the pollsters all said it's not the same turnout.
Myther Limbaugh.
And I and Dick Morris, Dick Morris was on Fox Everyone, it was basically saying the same thing that these polls were all miscalculating.
They were using a skewed sample that was not relative to the current circumstances, and they were hearkening back to the 2008 turnout using that as a model, and they turned out to be right.
So much as I would love to tell you that uh while you have a poll here that shows a tremendous number of people can't wait to go vote to register their anger and disgust with Obama.
Over here, you're a senator.
Your incumbent Democrat in the midst of all that is still leading.
I would love to tell you that I think it's a skewed poll, but I don't dare anymore.
And it may well be.
Uh not not just Kay Hagen, but uh Landru.
Who's landers aren't great, but you're looking at a runoff there.
And so that that's another thing.
Obama's not gonna do amnesty till after that runoff is over.
He's not gonna do it before the Senate is finished being shaped.
He is not gonna do amnesty till that runoff with Landrew is over and that race decided.
He's not gonna do anything that's gonna harm the Democrats' chances.
The only way he's gonna do amnesty is see if he can figure out a way to blame it on the Republicans.
And I don't doubt they're gonna continue to try.
How do you do that?
You somehow you finagle it so the Republicans are out there publicly advocating it.
Which they have been.
Now they've gone silent on it, well, not silent, but they've dialed it back.
Their support for amnesty right now, but not that long ago, month, six weeks ago.
I mean, they were everybody knew they were all for it.
So I I I've always felt that when it comes to amnesty, Obama's never gonna do that.
There's no credit.
Nobody's gonna get whoever does that, whoever's seen as responsible for it is not gonna get any credit.
It's nowhere near a majority support issue.
I mean, amnesty is gonna be the biggest flying finger in our face that there has ever been in politics.
Amnesty is going to be take this.
It does not have majority support, it's not even close.
It is going to be the epitome, the essence of governing against the will of the people.
And because of that, Obama's not going to do it till after all these Senate races are over and have been determined.
And the last runoff would be Landrew's in late November, early December.
I forget I think it's early early December.
But I'm I f I wish I could help you.
I wish I could explain to you why apparent empty suits are not suffering, Democrat incumbents, why they are not suffering at the same time the whole country's down on Obama.
All I can tell you is all politics is local, and that old adage, the old theory, but I think this is where the reality that the Republicans are not presenting an agenda or if not an agenda, a set of things that that they're gonna do to fix things, this is where it might be coming back to haunt them.
It's being left up to individual candidates to do, and depending on how good they are, depending how good their advisors are.
Let's face facts.
Something that I have gleaned in listening and watching sporadically, I must add, Republican campaigns, be they for the House or the Senate, one of the things I note is a common belief that they must somehow persuade the media of something.
And that to me is a guaranteed loser because it's not possible.
The media is never gonna see the light.
If you do a candidate's debate with the idea of changing the media coverage, never gonna happen.
If you do a uh a campaign appearance, or if you have a program or whatever that's designed to change media coverage, isn't gonna happen.
The media's not gonna end up supporting a Republican challenger to a Democrat incumbent.
It's not gonna happen.
Even if they win, I had told them this.
Remember that orientation I went to in uh in 1994, I told him, I said, you you you think you've won and you're gonna the media in this town's gonna love you, they're gonna resent the hell out of you, and they're gonna try to trip you up and they're gonna be mad at you for winning.
They're gonna wish Tony Coelho still ran the show, not Newt.
They're not your friends, and I even said, if Koki Roberts comes up and bats those big eyebrows at you and tries to seduce you into thinking she's on your team, don't fall for it.
I remember and and when I finished that speech, you know, the bunch of reporters in the Washington Post and those are in the room and it came up, I was assume my seat at the circular dinner table after I finished speaking.
Do you really do you really think all of that that you just I say, damn right I do.
I know full well you resent being in this room tonight.
Here you are covering the Republican freshman orientation.
The guy's gonna be running the House.
The last place in the world Saturday night, you people know I know damn well you don't even want to be here.
You'd rather be out partying with Ted Kennedy.
And they're writing furiously in my remarks and comments.
But it's so I I think it's a waste of time.
And when I when I when I hear candidates say, sometimes to me or other, yeah, we had a really good debate, you know, I think the media is starting to get wrong focus.
The media is not.
But the the Republicans can't get past it.
They can't get past the notion that they can't win unless the media is on their side.
And it's never gonna happen.
Well, I don't know about never, but certainly not in the anywhere near future.
Focus has always got to be on the people.
You gotta try to relate, build a bond of connection to people and how they're thinking and feeling.
And when the subject of immigration comes up in a debate, how hard is it to say you support jobs for Americans?
How hard is it to say that you don't understand why all of a sudden in this current Obama economy in this current economy why you want to flood the market with low skill, low-wage workers doesn't make any sense when there are plenty of Americans looking for work, and that's what you're gonna find.
How hard is that to say?
The media is gonna beat you over the head for it.
They're gonna call you bigots and anti this.
But you're gonna you're gonna resonate with voters.
To me, this is this is where I have to be very careful.
I want to phrase this correctly.
This is where I for some reason there isn't a lot of helpful tutelage from consultants on how to build a bond, how to connect with voters,
and let them know that that you're on their side and that you understand where they are, and that you like them, think we've got a mess that needs to be fixed and pretty damn fast.
But that's just me, and I always have to issue this caveat.
I'm not in politics, I'm in broadcasting, and it's an entirely different proposition.
Getting an audience is a much different thing than getting votes, and I would be the first to acknowledge it.
So I I say all these things with the caveat that I could very well be wrong about how to get votes.
No, I it's not my business.
There are people whose business is getting votes, and they well, I know they haven't been doing well, but it's it's just I understand the frustration.
You see the polling that shows a nationwide rising tide of disgust with Democrats, and you wonder, well, why isn't a Democrat in my state paying the price?
How did I when now wait a second?
Snerdley's asking me, how did I know that McCain wasn't gonna win before?
That didn't, that wasn't hard.
That that didn't.
Well, the consultants said that Romney was gonna uh McCain was was gonna win.
Well, look, um the Mc the McCain the McCain loss.
I mean, that I don't want to rehash, but that was easy to spot.
It was easy to spot.
You could you could that that was uh that was easy to spot.
I'll tell you when the first realization, when when I saw McCain for the two years, even before he knew that he got the nomination, I thought if he gets it, he's in for the biggest shock is all he did.
He was on MSNBC every night courting Chris Matthews, and uh at the time Tim Russard, he was courting all these people, and he really thought the media was his base.
He really that that was what he that that was his strategy.
He was joking about it, that was his strategy.
The media was gonna elect him.
Well, sorry.
It was the easiest prediction in the world to make that whenever the Democrats get a candidate, McCain becomes the enemy, and all this fun and friendly back and forth on MSNBC is going to end, and he's going to become enemy number one, and he's not gonna know what hit him.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out here, my friends will come back.
There's much more as always before the program ends.
There's always much more.
So sit tight back before you know it.
Back to the phones.
This is uh this is Mike in Columbus, Nebraska.
Mike, welcome to the EIB network.
Hello, sir.
Hey Rush, Megadettoes.
Thank you, sir.
Great, good to have you here.
Yeah, I wanted to expand upon your previous caller and the PSA at that uh Michigan State football game.
It was a PSA for sexual assault, and it started off with your typical Hollywood uh act uh famous people, then they were flashing different people that were reading the same script, and Biden was there in the middle, and then it ended with Obama, and when Obama came on the screen, uh the whole crowd booed as if the hometown quarterback just took a cheap shot.
It wasn't just somewhat booing, it was a loud, very noticeable boo as if the hometown quarterback had taken a cheap shot.
Wait a second.
Were you at the Michigan State game?
I was at the game, and matter of fact, I jokingly said to uh my wife who was sitting right next to me, uh, because our team was losing pretty handily at that point, and I said, uh that's the best part about this whole trip, and one of the Michigan State guys that was sitting about two rows in front of me hurt me, turned around, gave me a high five.
Not my experience with football fan.
But uh so it was a domestic you know, I think I saw there was a PSA in the NFL games I was watching it.
I saw it one time, and it was for domestic abuse, and I remember when I saw it, I cringed.
I've seen it on I've seen it on TV.
Um it's a it's an ad that's been playing on TV as well.
So it's it wasn't nothing out of the ordinary.
But the thing that really stood out at me is I thought, you know, here we are in Michigan, the heart of the unions, and we you know, Michigan State is only about an hour down the road from Detroit.
Right.
And it was it was not just a little bit of chorus of booze.
It was a loud boo for about five to six seconds when Obama came on, and I thought it was funny, and uh that lady was absolutely right.
It it was definitely noticeable, and it was directed at Obama being on the screen, and uh it it it made me feel good.
It made the whole trip worth it.
Good.
Good.
I can relate totally to this.
I know exactly how that woman felt.
For the first time, she felt like she wasn't alone.
She's she's in a stadium full of tens of thousands of people, and she for the first time in all this thinks that she's actually part of a big crowd of people that think this way.
Now, can you give me some of the names?
Because I'm trying to my memory of what I saw is really vague.
And when I say I cringed, it's not that I cringe at the subject.
It's so transparent.
Okay, so the NFL is known in the last month for being a league where women get beat up.
And so here comes predictably a PSA.
It just seems so transparent.
It's like it wouldn't have run if there hadn't been these incidents of spousal abuse.
Obviously, that makes sense.
But it just Well, it was definitely it you're you're exactly right.
Who were the actors and actresses in this thing?
Do you recall the uh the the the famous people you saw in it?
The main one that jumps out at me is I believe it was the lead actor from uh Mad Men.
I forget what his name is.
Um, but he was he was kind of the lead guy, and Joe Biden was in there, and uh there was a couple of female actresses, but I don't think that's the one I saw.
The the John Ham.
Is that the guy from Mad Men, the guy that uh that that plays uh uh Don Draper?
Yes.
That's that it's his character.
I'm not sure of the actors.
I don't know.
That's not the one I saw.
I I should have paid closer attention.
I should have made note of it.
I've seen it on TV, so it's probably easy to find on YouTube if if somebody was just a dig around a little bit.
But you know, using Don Draper, Let's f that's what they don't know him as John Ham.
They know his Don Dra.
What is Don Don Draper grew up in a whorehouse?
Don Draper cheated on his wife all over the place.
Don Draper was these people that some of the choices they make, it's it's ironic.
It's humorous.
That would have been like having Clinton in there.
Yeah, you're exactly right.
I didn't even put two and two together on that, but that's exactly right.
To have him be the and he was the front man, I believe, on the ad, if I remember correctly.
Okay.
Here's here's who's in it.
It's uh Daniel Craig, James Munn, Benichio del Toro, uh Duel Hill, never heard of him, uh Doulet Hill, Seth Myers and Steve K Steve Carroll.
So uh John Hamm's not in this.
At least at least, at least according to the source attempting to inform me of this at the moment.
Well, I'm not the authority on Hollywood actors.
I I'm I'm horrible at names and different things, but I've if I he that's who I was thinking it was, but I could be wrong.
Well, I I'm sure by now that Cookie listening to the program is trying to track this thing down, and and we'll have it.
I feel confident, I feel confident before the end of the program.
And it's I I but I don't recognize any of these people in the thing I saw during NFL telecasts yesterday, but it was the same thing.
It was it was how domestic abuse.
I guess is there anybody for domestic abuse?
This is my d why the the idea you have to have a PSA against it must I don't know.
It just me.
It's just me.
It it seems like it's unnecessary.
I don't know anybody who's in favor of domestic abuse.
I guess maybe they're gonna blame that on the Republicans too at some point if they can find a way.
Rush Limbaugh with half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Okay, there are two PSAs and John Hamm is in one of them.
So the caller was right.
I had been misinformed at first, second time today, but I'm always here to correct the mistakes of others and move on.
Now, it is apparent what this you put Obama and Biden in these things, and what do you have?
You've got a campaign ad.
Exactly right, Mr. Snerdley.
You have politics.
Politics infects everything when the Democrats are involved in it.
And so what this really is a another phase, if you will, of the so-called Republican war on women.
When you put Obama and Biden in a in a so-called PSA that is designed to say that they are opposed to spousal abuse, domestic abuse, domestic violence, and they are engaged in trying to do something about it.
The context is the Republican war on women.
It's never stated.
But again, I keep falling back on who's for it.
Why do you need a PSA against it?
Show me the lobbying group that's for domestic abuse.
That's what makes it political.
Folks.
Here is Cliff in Fort Worth.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
I'm glad I called too.
Um as a former soldier myself, I'm wondering what they're going to do with these 3,000 soldiers that they're sending to Africa after they all get infected with Ebola.
Where can we treat them?
Are we going to put them in the army hospitals?
Are we going to put them in the VA system?
Uh the people that have to treat them are going to be exposed to Ebola.
Now, wait a minute.
Why why are you automatically assuming they're going to contract the virus?
Well, I've talked to some medical people that have that have been involved in epidemological, you know, stuff, and they said they don't have a handle on this.
They say it's not transferred by um you know through the air and stuff, but no one really knows.
Most of the doctors and nurses that have worked on this have died.
You know, this is some real bad stuff.
Well, now wait is now wait, what wait, wait, we gotta be very careful.
Is it most doctors and nurses have died?
I know some.
Well, the ones that have worked directly with the patients.
The ones that have been been out there with the patients, the African, the native uh uh I know that I know that a couple of doctors have died, and one of them was treating patients in full dress hazmat gear and still contracted the uh the disease.
Yeah, the cameraman that worked for uh NBC was in full hazmat gear and he caught it.
Yeah.
This stuff's a lot worse than than people can even imagine.
No, no, no, no.
The Centers for Disease Control guys says it that that's just that's that's hogwash.
There's no reason to Now the numbers up to 4,000 because the uh the story is now from the Hill dot com, the U.S. sending a thousand additional troops to fight Ebola, the Pentagon sending as many as a thousand more troops to Africa to help fight the Ebola virus.
The troops are being sent on top of the three thousand President Obama's already offered or ordered to uh help efforts in in West Africa.
Rear Admiral John Kirby said Friday, we project that there could be nearly four thousand troops deployed in support of this mission.
Now, I'm not gonna put a floor or ceiling on it.
In other words, it could end up being more.
That's th that's a virtual death sentence for everybody that are sending it.
They're not gonna send their kids over there.
Now, this additional this additional thousand well, that's yeah, another story.
But but this additional thousand, this was announced late Friday when it was supposed to be unnoticed.
And and so now the total is up to four thousand.
What I don't I I haven't heard it explained.
Maybe it has been, and I've missed it.
But how do uniformed military personnel fight Ebola?
You can't shoot it.
What are they gonna do?
They're basically to enforce quarantines?
Are they basically there to make sure that the infected do not escape wherever they are and spread it further?
I I I wonder.
I I'm wondering if they're not over there to get infected.
And what do you do with these people when you bring them back?
I mean, if there's a high infection rate and you try and bring them back and put them into, say, military hospitals.
Well, you're awfully pessimistic about this.
I mean, you're assuming they're all gonna come back infected.
We've got we've got four we got four quarantine locations, I'm told in this.
Yeah, people can fly into this country on an airplane and never even be checked getting off the airplane coming in from an area that's got a that's right, because to do otherwise would be mean.
It would hurt and and it would it would yeah, it it it would it would be really it would be really beneath us to do that.
You know, Rush, when I was in Vietnam, I was wounded, and I spent time in every level of Army hospital all the way to convalescence and the VA hospitals.
I see how these places work.
The Army hospitals were better, but the VA hospitals are filthy.
Well if they put these people in the VA hospitals, that disease is gonna spread everywhere.
And um I just I shudder to think what can happen to this country once that breaks.
You know, it's it's geometrical in the uh in the infection rate, and I think it is airborne.
Show me how the the cameraman caught it if it's not airborne.
They say it isn't.
They say it's hard to get.
Obama's telling us that.
The CDC guys telling us that's hard to get.
They're telling us we've got nothing to worry about.
In fact, I don't know if you're ever listening on Friday, but we had this author, I can't remember his name now, and I wish I could, David something or other.
And he actually said in his in his own politically correct way that we bear the responsibility for these people in Africa getting this disease, and we can't turn our backs on them because of that.
He said the only reason they are there is because of American slavery.
Liberia came to exist because of American slavery, and since they fled this country to escape the bonds of slavery and they set up Liberia, if it hadn't been for us, they wouldn't now Be suffering from this virus.
And so we can't turn our backs on them.
We are culpable in his way of thinking.
If it hadn't been for us, if it hadn't been for slavery, there might not be Ebola.
Now he didn't say it in those words, but it's it's it's inescapable that conclusion.
My my point to you, Cliff, and I know that there are going to be some people smirk at this.
David Kwaman was the guy's name, and he's a well-known Ebola expert and has written books about it.
And I'm telling you, there are oddballs.
There are people in this country.
Do not doubt me on this, folks.
There are people in this country who believe what this guy said that this is ultimately traced back to us because of our slavery, and these poor people had to leave this country because it was so horrible here because of slavery, and they established Liberia.
Sierra Leone, by the way, was established by British African Americans who fled slavery there.
And if it hadn't been for that, they probably wouldn't have.
So there's some people who think we kind of deserve a little bit of this.
Make no mistake, that is leftist political correct thinking.
It's always been around.
The danger, the danger we have now is that we've elected people in positions of power and authority who think this or think like this in terms of this country being responsible, this country being to blame for things.
And is that kind of thinking which leads to opposition to shutting down airports from these various countries?
It leads to opposition to keeping these people out of the country.
How dare we?
We can't turn our backs on them.
They exist because of us.
We can't, we can't turn them away.
Well, that means that anything that happens to anybody here because of that policy, we kind of deserve.
And it's a perverted, convoluted way of thinking, and it's there.
Political correctness has been around for a long time.
And it's always been over there.
It's always been fringe.
But it isn't fringe anymore because we've elected people that think this way.
Cliff, I appreciate the call.
Uh we got some sound bites on all of this that we'll get to and story updates right after this break, so don't go away.
Here is the PSA.
We've got the audio of the PSA that our callers saw air at the Michigan State.
Football game.
Quicksnerdly, in what city in Michigan is Michigan State found.
Okay, in what state is the what city is the University of Michigan found.
And Ann Arbor is where Michigan is.
That's right, Michigan State's in Atlance.
It's a little pop quiz.
I mean, just to just to check the knowledge of the staff.
Asking a guy from Queens.
There is no Michigan, except on election day.
Then it matters.
And here is the PSA that's led off with John Ham.
Here are the uh the Hollywood people in it.
Uh John Hamm, Olivia Pope, uh, Carrie Washington, sorry, Joel McHale, Rose Byrne, you remember her from Damages, Kevin Love, uh Naim Biotick and Randy Jackson together.
And then somebody called Questlove, and then Connie, is it Britain or Brighton?
She's on Nashville.
You don't know how she was on Friday Night Lights.
I never know.
It's two T's, so I'm assuming it's Connie Britton.
And then John Hamm and then Biden and Obama.
So here it is.
It's on us to stop sexual assault.
To get in the way before it happens.
To get a friend home safe.
And to not blame the victim.
It's on us.
To look out for each other.
To not look the other way.
It's on us to stand up.
To step in.
To take responsibility.
It's on us.
All of us to stop sexual assault.
Learn how.
And take the pledge at it'sonus.org.
Well, at least there's not a hashtag.
They've got how how far away can that be, though?
A hashtag.
Ask it.
What's the question?
What is the now now?
Okay, the question is why is it or how is it on us to stop sexual assault?
Well, it's on you to not beat up your wife.
And they're also saying if you see somebody beating up their spouse, you're supposed to step in and stop it.
And then you're not supposed to blame the victim.
And then you're not supposed to look the other way, and then John Ham said to take responsibility.
And then Biden said it's on us, all of us.
Learn how and take the pledge at it's on us not.
And that's when the place booed like crazy.
When Obama came up in the finale of the 32nd PSA.
So it's this is what I I'm telling you, this is exactly why this makes it political.
This the point of this PSA.
If you strip everything away, and if if you take these people at their word and what they mean, we're permitting this to happen.
And we better stop it.
We are allowing it to happen.
We're not assuming responsibility.
We're not interceding.
We're not getting in the way of it.
We're not stopping it.
We are letting it's on us.
It's on all of us.
We are failing to prevent it.
So this is an attempt to ladle guilt out on everybody.
And don't tell me I'm making too much of this, because I know exactly how these people think.
I know how to connect the dots between the way these people think and what their desired political outcome is on this.
And this is not just a feel-good thing, and it's not just something to make you think these people are enlightened and know the right and wrong here.
What they're trying to tell you is that you don't know what's right and wrong until they tell you.
And now they're telling you that it's wrong, and you'd better do something about it.
It's not that they're accusing everybody of being sexual abusers.
They're saying we're all responsible unless we intercede and stop it.
And the the broad-based meaning is we have a cultural problem.
It's all on us.
This is happening because you and you and you and you over there, and you are not doing enough to stop it.
You're not doing enough to care.
You are probably witnessing it.
You are seeing it take place, and you are looking the other way.
You are not trying to stop it.
You are not reporting it, and therefore it's not only on the PERP, it's on you.
Much the same way climate destruction is on you.
Same thinking here, same attempt at guilting everybody into accepting a a proper political perspective on this.
Here's Karen Brighton, Michigan.
You're next.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hi, Russ.
Uh, glad to talk to you.
I have a former graduate of Michigan State University, and it is located in East Lansing, Michigan.
Um, I was thrilled to hear the previous caller mention the fact that the whole stadium booed when Obama came over the PA or the picture of him.
Um I think we're all just fed up.
And those of us with families and with um people that we care about, we want to know why the CDC is lying to us about the Holy Ebola uh virus, why they're not shutting down the borders, why they're letting these people in from West Africa.
Wait, um wait.
You uh th there is, and again it's political, but there is an explanation for why they're not shutting down the border.
And you know it as well as I do.
They can't shut down the border because as soon as everybody forgets about this, they're gonna do amnesty.
They can't shut down the border To these people and keep it open for others, they're never gonna shut the border.
They're not gonna shut the border because Obama and whoever else wants to do amnesty.
So if the price for that is a bowl of patients getting into this country, that's just what we're gonna have to pay because they are not gonna shut the border, Karen.
Okay, we said that they're gonna kill off the whole population?
That's what I can say about this.
I'm not don't anybody I'm not saying that.
But you know what?
I totally, when you say that you and everybody else are fed up, I know.
I have been fed up since before January 2009.
I have been waiting six years for people to join me and being fed up.
Now you've probably been fed up for much longer than I know.
But the fact is you are one of millions who are fed up.
You're fed up with the way the economy is being ignored, you're fed up with the way the health is being you're fed up with Obamacare, you're fed up with all of it.
You're fed up with the fact that there aren't any jobs to have.
You're fed up that there's no great career advancement possible.
You're fed up at all kinds, you're fed up with the president apologizing for the country.
You're fed up at the squandered opportunities that exist.
You're fed up that you have no political leadership in Washington for what you believe.
Everybody's fed up, except they don't know that everybody else is fed up with them.
Because that story is just not told.
So when you see a PSA like this and the whole stadium erupts in a boo, you feel like you're part of the crowd finally.
How many of these Hollywood people, actresses and actors, how many of them called out Bill Clinton?
When Paula Jones accused him of sexual harassment, how many people interceded to stop Bill Clinton from his behavior of, say, Kathleen Willie?
▲
Export Selection