All Episodes
Oct. 6, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:49
October 6, 2014, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'm sorry, I don't know what to tell you.
If I knew what to tell you, I'd tell you.
I just don't know what it means.
And there's no way of knowing what it means.
Too often I have said that poll is crazy.
The last time that I have thrown out poll results to my regret was the 2012 presidential race.
I thought there's no way Romney was down six or eight points.
I thought those polls had to be full of it.
I thought they were using an incorrect turnout sample.
And those polls are right on the money.
So I don't think it's a safe bet to just reject polls that apparently don't make sense to you.
Well, no, it just, I'm being flooded with emails from people who are in a not a panic, but I mean, they're curious.
Okay, so we have this polling data out here.
Voter opposition Obama at 16-year high.
I mean, these are just a Gallup poll, and these are people who say specifically that the reason they're going to vote is to register opposition to Obama's policies.
It's a record high for that poll in Gallup.
I mean, and it's a big number.
It's huge.
The number of people who say in a poll, the reason they're going to vote is to send a message to Obama that they hate what the hell he's doing.
Okay, so there's that.
And then over here in North Carolina, this Kay Hagan, I got to be very careful here.
But that's one example where she's leading.
NBC has a poll.
She's ahead of Tom Tillis.
It doesn't make any sense.
People, well, Rush, what does this mean?
I don't know, folks.
In the past, my instinctive reaction would be that the polls have been doctored to keep you dispirited, to keep you depressed, and to counter what the drive-bys and their polling units know is going to be a bad year for Democrats.
But as I say, the last time that I actually thought that was the 2012 presidential polls, and I was dead wrong.
Now, tell you the mistake I made.
By the way, welcome back.
Great to have you.
El Rush, we're here at 800-282-2882.
I was looking at the 2010 midterms, which was the closest election to 2012.
And I was thinking, why in the world are the pollsters not using that as a model?
Because that was a Tea Party turnout.
It was an anti-Obamacare turnout.
And the pollsters all said, because a presidential turnout is different from a midterm, it doesn't matter what's happening in the midterm.
And you've got to compare polls from 2008 to 2012, not 2010.
You have to have a poll that's got the same turnout size, same basic makeup.
And the polls that did that show an Obama win by anywhere from four to eight points.
And I was stubbornly stuck here thinking, how in the world can there be a 2010 turnout that gave the Republicans the House, that lifted the Tea Party to vast stages of relevance, be ignored?
And the pollsters all said it's not the same turnout, Mithrilimbo.
And Dick Morris, Dick Morris was on Fox every day, basically saying the same thing, that these polls were all miscalculating.
They were using a skewed sample that was not relative to the current circumstances.
And they were hearkening back to the 2008 turnout using that as a model.
And they turned out to be right.
So much as I would love to tell you that while you have a poll here that shows a tremendous number of people can't wait to go vote to register their anger and disgust with Obama over here, your senator, your incumbent Democrat, in the midst of all that is still leading.
I would love to tell you that I think it's a skewed poll, but I don't dare anymore.
And it may well be not just Kay Hagan, but Landrew, whose Landers aren't great, but you're looking at a runoff there.
And so that's another thing.
Obama's not going to do amnesty until after that runoff is over.
He's not going to do it before the Senate is finished being shaped.
He is not going to do amnesty until that runoff with Landrew is over and that race decided.
He's not going to do anything that's going to harm the Democrats' chances.
The only way he's going to do amnesty is if he can figure out a way to blame it on the Republicans.
And I don't doubt they're going to continue to try.
How do you do that?
You somehow you finagle it so the Republicans are out there publicly advocating it, which they have been.
Now they've gone silent on it.
Well, not silent, but they've dialed it back, their support for amnesty right now.
But not that long ago, a month, six weeks ago, I mean, they were, everybody knew they were all for it.
So I've always felt that when it comes to amnesty, Obama's never going to do that.
There's no credit.
Nobody's going to get, whoever does that, whoever's seen is responsible for it is not going to get any credit.
It's nowhere near a majority support issue.
I mean, amnesty is going to be the biggest flying finger in our face that there has ever been in politics.
Amnesty is going to be, take this.
It does not have majority support.
It's not even close.
It is going to be the epitome, the essence of governing against the will of the people.
And because of that, Obama's not going to do it till after all these Senate races are over and have been determined.
And the last runoff would be Landrew's in late November, early December.
I forget, I think it's early December.
But I wish I could help you.
I wish I could explain to you why apparent empty suits are not suffering, Democrat incumbents, why they are not suffering at the same time the whole country's down on Obama.
All I can tell you is all politics is local, that old adage, the old theory.
But I think this is where the reality that the Republicans are not presenting an agenda or if not an agenda, a set of things that they're going to do to fix things, this is where it might be coming back to haunt them.
It's being left up to individual candidates to do.
And depending on how good they are, depending how good their advisors are, let's face facts.
Something that I have gleaned in listening and watching sporadically, I must add, Republican campaigns, be they for the House or the Senate, one of the things I note is a common belief that they must somehow persuade the media of something.
And that to me is a guaranteed loser because it's not possible.
The media is never going to see the light.
If you do a candidate's debate with the idea of changing the media coverage, never going to happen.
You do a campaign appearance or if you have a program or whatever that's designed to change media coverage, it isn't going to happen.
The media is not going to end up supporting a Republican challenger to a Democrat incumbent.
It's not going to happen.
Even they win.
I told them this.
Remember that orientation I went to?
In 1994, I told them, I said, you think you've won and the media in this town is going to love you.
They're going to resent the hell out of you.
And they're going to try to trip you up and they're going to be mad at you for winning.
They're going to wish Tony Coelho still ran the show, not Newt.
They're not your friends.
And I even said, if Cokie Roberts comes up and bats those big eyebrows at you and tries to seduce you into thinking she's on your team, don't fall for it.
And when I finished that speech, you know, a bunch of reporters in the Washington Post and those are in the room and they came up.
I was assumed my seat at the circular dinner table after I finished speaking.
Do you really, do you really think all of that that you just, I said, damn right I do.
I know full well you resent being in this room tonight.
Here you are covering the Republican freshman orientation.
The guy's going to be running the house.
The last place in the world, Saturday night, you people, I know damn well you don't even want to be here.
You'd rather be out partying with Ted Kennedy.
And they're writing furiously in my remarks and comments.
But it's so I think it's a waste of time.
And when I hear candidates say sometimes to me or, yeah, we had a really good debate.
You know, I think the media is starting to get wrong focus.
The media is not, but the Republicans can't get past it.
They can't get past the notion that they can't win unless the media is on their side.
And it's never going to happen.
Well, I don't know about never, but certainly not in the anywhere near future.
Focus has always got to be on the people.
You've got to try to relate, build a bond of connection to people and how they're thinking and feeling.
And when the subject of immigration comes up in a debate, how hard is it to say you support jobs for Americans?
How hard is it to say that you don't understand why all of a sudden in this current Obama economy, I want to say Obama, in this current economy, why you want to flood the market with low-skill, low-wage workers doesn't make any sense when there are plenty of Americans looking for work and that's what you're going to find.
How hard is that to say?
The media is going to beat you over the head for it.
They're going to call you bigots and anti-this, but you're going to resonate with voters.
To me, this is where I have to be very careful.
I want to phrase this correctly.
This is where, for some reason, there isn't a lot of helpful tutelage from consultants on how to build a bond, how to connect with voters and let them know that you're on their side and that you understand where they are and that you,
like them, think we've got a mess that needs to be fixed and pretty damn fast.
But that's just me.
And I always have to issue this caveat.
I'm not in politics.
I'm in broadcasting and it's an entirely different proposition.
Getting an audience is a much different thing than getting votes and I would be the first to acknowledge it.
So I say all these things with the caveat that I could very well be wrong about how to get votes.
No, it's not my business.
There are people whose business is getting votes, and they, well, I know they haven't been doing well, but it's just, I understand the frustration.
You see the polling that shows a nationwide rising tide of disgust with Democrats, and you wonder, well, why isn't a Democrat in my state paying the price?
How did I when, you know, now, wait a second.
Snirdly's asking me, how did I know that McCain wasn't going to win before?
That didn't, that wasn't hard.
That, that didn't.
Well, the consultants said that Romney was going to say McCain was going to win.
Well, look, the McCain loss, I mean, I don't want to rehish, but that was easy to spot.
It was easy to spot.
That was easy to spot.
I'll tell you when the first realization, when I saw McCain for the two years, even before he knew that he got the nomination, I thought if he gets it, he's in for the biggest shock because all he did, he was on MSNBC every night courting Chris Matthews.
And at the time, Tim Russert, he was courting all these people, and he really thought the media was his base.
He really, that was what he, that was his strategy.
He was joking about it.
That was his strategy.
The media was going to elect him.
Well, sorry.
It was the easiest prediction in the world to make that whenever the Democrats get a candidate, McCain becomes the enemy, and all this fun and friendly back and forth on MSNBC is going to end, and he's going to become enemy number one, and he's not going to know what hit him.
Anyway, let me take a brief time out here, my friends.
We'll come back.
There's much more as always.
Before the program ends, there's always much more.
So sit tight back before you know it.
Back to the phones.
This is Mike in Columbus, Nebraska.
Mike, welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello, sir.
Hey, Rush, Megan Dinnos.
Thank you, sir.
Great.
Good to have you here.
Yeah, I wanted to expand upon your previous caller and the PSA at that Michigan State football game.
It was a PSA for sexual assault, and it started off with your typical Hollywood act of famous people, then they were flashing different people that were reading the same script.
And Biden was there in the middle, and then it ended with Obama.
And when Obama came on the screen, the whole crowd booed as if the hometown quarterback just took a cheap shot.
It wasn't just somewhat booing.
It was a loud, very noticeable boo as if the hometown quarterback had taken the cheap shot.
Wait a second.
Were you at the Michigan State game?
I was at the game.
And matter of fact, I jokingly said to my wife who was sitting right next to me, because our team was losing pretty handily at that point.
And I said, that's the best part about this whole trip.
And one of the Michigan State guys that was sitting about two rows in front of me heard me, turned around, gave me a high five.
Not my experience with football.
But so it was a domestic, you know, I think I saw there was a PSA in the NFL games I was watching.
I saw it one time, and it was for domestic abuse.
And I remember when I saw it, I cringed.
I've seen it on TV.
It's an ad that's been playing on TV as well.
So it wasn't nothing out of the ordinary.
But the thing that really stood out at me is I thought, you know, here we are in Michigan, the heart of the unions.
And we, you know, Michigan State is only about an hour down the road from Detroit.
Right.
And it was, it was not just a little bit of chorus of booze.
It was a loud boo for about five to six seconds when Obama came on.
And I thought it was funny.
And that lady was absolutely right.
It was definitely noticeable, and it was directed at Obama being on the screen.
And it made me feel good.
It made the whole trip worth it.
Good.
Good.
I can relate totally to this.
I know exactly how that woman felt.
For the first time, she felt like she wasn't alone.
She's in a stadium full of tens of thousands of people.
And she, for the first time in all this, thinks that she's actually part of a big crowd of people that think this way.
Now, can you give me some of the names?
Because I'm trying to, my memory of what I saw is really vague.
And when I say I cringed, it's not that I cringe at the subject.
It's so transparent.
Okay, so the NFL is known in the last month for being a league where women get beat up.
And so here comes predictably a PSA.
It just seems so transparent.
It's like it wouldn't have run if there hadn't been these incidents of spousal abuse.
Obviously, that makes sense.
Well, it was definitely.
You're exactly right.
Who were the actors and actresses in this thing?
Do you recall the famous people you saw in it?
The main one that jumps out at me is, I believe, it was the lead actor from Mad Men.
I forget what his name is, but he was kind of the lead guy.
And Joe Biden was in there.
And there was a couple of female actresses.
I don't think that's the one I saw.
John Ham, is that the guy from Mad Men?
The guy that plays Don Draper?
Yes, that's his character.
I'm not sure of the actor.
I don't get it.
That's not the one I saw.
I should have paid closer attention.
I should have made note of it.
I've seen it on TV, so it's probably easy to find on YouTube if somebody was just to dig around a little bit.
But, you know, using Don Draper, they don't know him as John Hamm.
They know his Don Draper.
What is Don?
Don Draper grew up in a whorehouse.
Don Draper cheated on his wife all over the place.
Don Draper was these people, some of the choices they make, it's ironic.
It's humorous.
That would have been like having Clinton in there.
Yeah, you're exactly right.
I didn't even put two and two together on that, but that's exactly right.
To have him be the, and he was the front man, I believe, on the ad, if I remember correctly.
Okay, here's who's in it.
It's Daniel Craig, James Monn, Benicio Del Toro, Duel Hill, never heard of him, or Dulay Hill, Seth Meyers of Steve Carroll.
So John Hamm's not in this.
At least, at least, according to the source attempting to inform me of this at the moment.
Well, I'm not the authority on Hollywood actors.
I'm horrible at names and different things, but that's who I was thinking it was, but I could be wrong.
Well, I'm sure by now that Cookie, listening to the program, is trying to track this thing down.
And we'll have it.
I feel confident.
Excuse me.
I feel confident before the end of the program.
But I don't recognize any of these people in the thing I saw during NFL telecasts yesterday.
But it was the same thing.
It was how domestic.
I guess is there anybody for domestic abuse?
The idea you have to have a PSA against it must, I don't know.
It just me.
It's just me.
It seems like it's unnecessary.
I don't know anybody who's in favor of domestic abuse.
I guess maybe they're going to blame that on the Republicans, too, at some point if they can find a way.
Rush Limbaugh with half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Okay, there are two PSAs and John Hamm is in one of them.
So the caller was right.
I had been misinformed at first, second time today.
But I'm always here to correct the mistakes of others and move on.
Now, it is apparent what this you put Obama and Biden in these things, and what do you have?
You've got a campaign ad.
Exactly right, Mr. Snerdley.
You have politics.
Politics infects everything when the Democrats are involved in it.
And so what this really is, is another phase, if you will, of the so-called Republican war on women.
When you put Obama and Biden in a so-called PSA that is designed to say that they are opposed to spousal abuse, domestic abuse, domestic violence, and they are engaged in trying to do something about it.
The context is the Republican War on Women.
It's never stated.
But again, I keep falling back.
Who's for it?
Why do you need a PSA against it?
Show me the lobbying group that's for domestic abuse.
That's what makes it political, folks.
Here is Cliff in Fort Worth.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I'm glad I called, too.
As a former soldier myself, I'm wondering what they're going to do with these 3,000 soldiers that they're sending to Africa after they all get infected with Ebola.
Where can we treat them?
Are we going to put them in the Army hospitals?
Are we going to put them in the VA system?
The people that have to treat them are going to be exposed to Ebola.
Now, wait a minute.
Why are you automatically assuming they're going to contract the virus?
Well, I've talked to some medical people that have been involved in epidemiological stuff, and they said they don't have a handle on this.
They say it's not transferred by through the air and stuff.
But no one really knows.
Most of the doctors and nurses that have worked on this have died.
You know, this is some real bad stuff.
Well, now, wait, now, wait, wait, wait, wait.
We've got to be very careful.
Is it most doctors and nurses have died?
I know some.
Well, the ones that have worked directly with the patients.
The ones that have been out there with the patients, the African, the native visitors.
Now, I know that a couple of doctors have died, and one of them was treating patients in full-dress hazmat gear and still contracted the disease.
Yeah, the cameraman that worked for NBC was in full hazmat gear, and he caught it.
This stuff's a lot worse than people can even imagine.
No, no, no, no.
The Centers for Disease Control, guys, says that's just, that's hogwash.
There's no reason to.
Well.
Now, the number's up to 4,000 because the story is now from theHill.com, the U.S. sending 1,000 additional troops to fight Ebola.
The Pentagon sending as many as a thousand more troops to Africa to help fight the Ebola virus.
The troops are being sent on top of the 3,000 President Obama's already offered or ordered to help efforts in West Africa.
Rear Admiral John Kirby said Friday, we project that there could be nearly 4,000 troops deployed in support of this mission.
Now, I'm not going to put a floor or ceiling on it.
In other words, it could end up being more.
It's a virtual death sentence for everybody that they're sending.
They're not going to send their kids over there.
Now, this additional thousand, well, that's, yeah, another story.
But this additional thousand, this was announced late Friday when it was supposed to be unnoticed.
And so now the total is up to 4,000.
What I don't, I haven't heard it explained.
Maybe it has been and I've missed it.
But how do uniformed military personnel fight Ebola?
You can't shoot it.
What are they going to do?
Basically to enforce quarantines?
Are they basically there to make sure that the infected do not escape wherever they are and spread it further?
I wonder.
I'm wondering if they're not over there to get infected.
And what do you do with these people when you bring them back?
I mean, if there's a high infection rate and you try and bring them back and put them into, say, military hospitals?
Well, you're awfully pessimistic about this.
I mean, you're assuming they're all going to come back infected.
We got four quarantine locations, I'm told.
Yeah, people can fly into this country on an airplane and never even be checked getting off the airplane coming in from an area that's got it.
That's right, because to do otherwise would be mean.
Would hurt people's feelings.
It would hurt.
And it would, yeah, it would be really beneath us to do that.
You know, Rush, when I was in Vietnam, I was wounded, and I spent time in every level of Army hospital, all the way to convalescence and the VA hospitals.
I see how these places work.
The Army hospitals were better, but the VA hospitals are filthy.
If they put these people in the VA hospitals, that disease is going to spread everywhere.
And I just, I shudder to think what can happen to this country once that breaks.
You know, it's geometrical in the infection rate.
And I think it is airborne.
Show me how the cameraman caught it if it's not airborne.
They say it isn't.
They say it's hard to get.
Obama's telling us that.
The CDC guy is telling us that it's hard to get.
They're telling us we've got nothing to worry about.
In fact, I don't know if you're ever listening on Friday, but we had this author, I can't remember his name now, and I wish I could, David something or other.
And he actually said in his own politically correct way that we bear the responsibility for these people in Africa getting this disease, and we can't turn our backs on them because of that.
He said the only reason they are there is because of American slavery.
Liberia came to exist because of American slavery.
And since they fled this country to escape the bonds of slavery and they set up Liberia, if it hadn't been for us, they wouldn't now be suffering from this virus.
And so we can't turn our backs on them.
We are culpable in his way of thinking.
If it hadn't been for us, if it hadn't been for slavery, there might not be Ebola.
Now, he didn't say it in those words, but it's inescapable that conclusion.
My point to you, Cliff, and I know that there are going to be some people smirk at this.
David Kwaman was the guy's name, and he's a well-known Ebola expert and has written books about it.
And I'm telling you, there are oddballs.
There are people in this country.
Do not doubt me on this, folks.
There are people in this country who believe what this guy said, that this is ultimately traced back to us because of our slavery.
And these poor people had to leave this country because it was so horrible here because of slavery.
And they established Liberia.
Sierra Leone, by the way, was established by British African Americans who fled slavery there.
And if it hadn't been for that, they probably wouldn't have.
So there's some people who think we kind of deserve a little bit of this.
Make no mistake, that is leftist political correct thinking.
It's always been around.
The danger, the danger we have now is that we've elected people in positions of power and authority who think this or think like this in terms of this country being responsible, this country being to blame for things.
And it's that kind of thinking which leads to opposition to shutting down airports from these various countries.
It leads to opposition to keeping these people out of the country.
How dare we?
We can't turn our backs on them.
They exist because of us.
We can't turn them away.
Well, that means that anything that happens to anybody here because of that policy, we kind of deserve.
And it's a perverted, convoluted way of thinking, and it's there.
Political correctness has been around for a long time, and it's always been over there.
It's always been fringe.
But it isn't fringe anymore because we've elected people who think this way.
Cliff, I appreciate the call.
We've got some soundbites on all of this that we'll get to and story updates right after this break, so don't go away.
Here is the PSA.
We've got the audio of the PSA that our callers saw air at the Michigan State football game.
Quick snerdly, in what city in Michigan is Michigan State found?
He doesn't know its amateur.
Okay, in what state is the University of Michigan found?
And Ann Arbor is where Michigan is.
That's right.
Michigan State's in Lance.
It's a little pop quiz.
I mean, just to check the knowledge of the staff.
Asking a guy from Queens.
There is no Michigan except on Election Day.
Then it matters.
And here is the PSA that's led off with John Hamm.
Here are the Hollywood people in it.
John Hamm, Olivia Pope, Carrie Washington, sorry.
Joel McHale, Rose Byrne.
You remember her from Damages.
Kevin Love.
Maim Biotik and Randy Jackson together.
And then somebody called Questlove.
And then Connie, is it Britton or Brighton?
She's on Nashville.
You don't know how.
She was on Friday Night Lights.
I never know.
It's two T's, so I'm assuming it's Connie Britton.
And then John Hamm, and then Biden and Obama.
So here it is.
It's on us to stop sexual assault.
To get in the way before it happens.
To get a friend home safe.
And to not blame the victim.
It's on us.
To look out for each other.
To not look the other way.
It's on us to stand up.
To step in.
To take responsibility.
It's on us, all of us, to stop sexual assault.
Learn how.
And take the pledge at itsonus.org.
Well, at least there's not a hashtag.
They've got, how far away can that be, though?
A hashtag.
Ask it.
What's the question?
What is the all right now?
Now, now, now, now, okay, the question is, why is it or how is it on us to stop sexual assault?
Well, it's on you to not beat up your wife.
And they're also saying if you see somebody beating up their spouse, you're supposed to step in and stop it.
And then you're not supposed to blame the victim.
And then you're not supposed to look the other way.
And then John Hamm said to take responsibility.
And then Biden said, it's on us, all of us.
Learn how and take the pledge at it's on us.
And that's when the place booed like crazy, when Obama came up in the finale of the 32nd PSA.
So it's this is what I'm telling you.
This is exactly why this makes it political.
This, the point of this PSA, if you strip everything away, and if you take these people at their word and what they mean, we're permitting this to happen, and we better stop it.
We are allowing it to happen.
We're not assuming responsibility.
We're not interceding.
We're not getting in the way of it.
We're not stopping it.
We are letting it, it's on us.
It's on all of us.
We are failing to prevent it.
So this is an attempt to ladle guilt out on everybody.
And don't tell me I'm making too much of this because I know exactly how these people think.
I know how to connect the dots between the way these people think and what their desired political outcome is on this.
And this is not just a feel-good thing, and it's not just something to make you think these people are enlightened and know the right and wrong here.
What they're trying to tell you is that you don't know what's right and wrong until they tell you.
And now they're telling you that it's wrong, and you'd better do something about it.
It's not that they're accusing everybody of being sexual abusers.
They're saying we're all responsible unless we intercede and stop it.
And the broad-based meaning is we have a cultural problem.
It's all on us.
This is happening because you and you and you and you over there, and you are not doing enough to stop it.
You're not doing enough to care.
You are probably witnessing it.
You are seeing it take place and you are looking the other way.
You are not trying to stop it.
You are not reporting it.
And therefore, it's not only on the perp, it's on you.
Much the same way climate destruction is on you.
Same thinking here, same attempt at guilting everybody into accepting a proper political perspective on this.
Here's Karen Brighton, Michigan.
You're next.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Yes.
Hi, Rush.
Glad to talk to you.
I was a former graduate of Michigan State University, and it is located in East Lansing, Michigan.
I was thrilled to hear the previous caller mention the fact that the whole stadium booed when Obama came over the PA or the picture of him.
I think we're all just fed up.
And those of us with families and with people that we care about, we want to know why the CDC is lying to us about the whole Ebola virus, why they're not shutting down the borders, why they're letting these people in from West Africa.
Wait.
Wait.
There is, and again, it's political, but there is an explanation for why they're not shutting down the border.
And you know it as well as I do.
They can't shut down the border because as soon as everybody forgets about this, they're going to do amnesty.
They can't shut down the border to these people and keep it open for others.
They're never going to shut the border.
They're not going to shut the border because Obama and whoever else wants to do amnesty.
So if the price for that is Ebola patients getting into this country, that's just what we're going to have to pay because they are not going to shut the border, Karen.
Okay, so that they're going to kill off the whole population?
That's what I'm concerned about.
I'm not, don't anybody, I'm not saying that.
But you know what?
I totally, when you say that you and everybody else are fed up, I know.
I have been fed up since before January of 2009.
I have been waiting six years for people to join me in being fed up.
Now, you've probably been fed up for much longer than I know.
But the fact is you are one of millions who are fed up.
You're fed up with the way the economy is being ignored.
You're fed up with the way the health is being.
You're fed up with Obamacare.
You're fed up with all of it.
You're fed up with the fact that there aren't any jobs to have.
You're fed up that there's no great career advancement possible.
You're fed up at all kinds.
You're fed up at the president apologizing for the country.
You're fed up at the squandered opportunities that exist.
You're fed up that you have no political leadership in Washington for what you believe.
Everybody's fed up, except they don't know that everybody else is fed up with them.
Because that story is just not told.
So when you see a PSA like this and the whole stadium erupts in a boo, you feel like you're part of the crowd finally.
Hey, I have a quick question.
How many of these Hollywood people, actresses and actors, how many of them called out Bill Clinton when Paula Jones accused him of sexual harassment?
How many people interceded to stop Bill Clinton from his behavior of, say, Kathleen Willie?
Export Selection