All Episodes
Previous Next
May 15, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:37
May 15, 2014, Thursday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
Greetings, my friends.
Great to have you, L. Rushbow here at the Excellence in Broadcasting Network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
We have another exciting three hours of broadcast excellence straight ahead, just for you.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, the email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Ladies and gentlemen, you are listening to your harmless lovable fuzzball host Rush Limbaugh, well-known radio rack and tour bon vivant, and now Children's Book, author of the year.
The awards were handed out last night by the Children's Book Council.
And I just I want to take a moment here to thank everyone in the audience, particularly uh young people who voted.
This is an award where the readers determine the winners.
And Catherine and I flew up after the program yesterday to New York for the uh awards banquet, the the event.
This is the seventh annual.
It's relatively new, and it's combined with a children's literacy uh project, and it was really it was a what a great evening.
It was a wonderful event, and I had honestly, I'm sure you understand, no expectation of winning this thing.
And when they announced my name, I was I was uh well, I was momentarily frozen there.
We were sitting in the front row with uh a couple people from from Steinman und Schuster, the uh well-known publishing house, Mitchell Ivers, uh and and uh Jean Ann Rose, they were there with us, and it was just a really, really nice uh event.
And I have to say there were so many immigrants that came up to me uh before the event started, where everybody was being seated and and during the event and were telling me what what coming to America meant to them.
One of them was the photographer, uh, one of the official photographers for the event.
Uh there were just a lot of people that that were uh working the event that came up and wanted me to understand how much America had meant to them, and it was uh it was really great.
Now we've got at Rush Limbaugh.com and over at our Facebook page, we have posted the video of my acceptance remarks.
They gave every award winner two minutes.
It's an event, you know, it's a children's book event, and it uh oh funny story.
It it's scheduled to run from 6 to 8 p.m. basically.
They do dinner at 6, 6.15, and then at 7 to 715, everybody's supposed to be seated.
Well, we've landed right at 6 o'clock.
So we hustle off the plane, we get in a car, and my security guy, Joseph Stalin's phone rings.
And I hear him say, yeah, really?
Oh, well, is it still on?
I said, oh no, what's happened?
So he he completes the call.
I said, What happened?
He said, There's a fire in the in the in the in the building.
And they're evacuating everybody.
I said, Oh no!
They think I'm there already.
It turns out it was a minor little smoke thing in the basement of this building.
It was um it was it was near Chinatown in and little Italy in lower Manhattan in an old giant building.
It used to be a Bowery Bank branch, and it was really decked out, tastefully, really, really well done, and the ceremony had some kids singing songs uh before it and afterwards, and the presentation of the awards was really well done.
And it was I two years ago, this is the last place I would have ever expected to be.
Uh two years ago, the last thing I would have ever expected to have done would have been writing books aimed at uh children ages 10 to 13, but you know the story there actually for everybody, the books are, but primarily children's books.
So I want to play for you the uh the video of all this, as I say at rushlimbaugh.com.
We're also posting it at 2fbyt.com and our Facebook page.
But we've got the audio here for you, and I want to play for you the introduction, the the the uh uh intro of me and winning the author of the year award is what I won.
And it was presented by the uh executive director, Robin Adelson of the uh Children's Book Council and Every Child a Reader, she's the executive director.
And here is her presentation listing all the nominees and the winner.
If any of the contenders for author of the year come as a surprise to you, maybe you haven't been paying attention to their audiences.
They certainly have.
The books that put their authors on this list covered the subjects kids and teens like most.
There's mythology, wimpiness, dorkiness, dauntlessness, and a snarky talking horse that travels back through time.
Each book on this list and each author has a mind-boggling fan base.
They came out in droves to vote for their favorites.
The children's choice book awards finalists for the author of the year.
Uh Jeff Kinney, Diary of a Wimpy Kid.
Hard luck.
Rush Limbo, Rush Revere and the Brave Pilgrims.
Time travel adventures with exceptional Americans.
Rick Riordan, The House of Hades, Heroes of Olympus, Book 4.
Veronica Roth, a legion.
Rachel Renee Russell, Dork Diary 6.
Tales from a Not So Happy Heartbreaker.
We've been doing this seven years.
I've never gotten to open one of these envelopes.
And the winner is author of the year, Rush Limba for Rush Revere and the Brave Pelgrims.
Time travel adventures with exceptional Americans.
Yes, folks, you're hearing correctly.
You're hearing applause there.
So I stood up, I'm in the front row.
I stood up, I'm looking at at everybody, and I'm sort of in uh in disbelief.
So I I I uh paused for a couple of pictures, photographer, the uh the immigrant uh who who just must have told me three or four times just how how proud he was to come to America and how much it had meant to him coming here.
And I finally posted for him for a couple times.
I made my way to the stage, and they'd given us two minutes.
They asked everybody keep it at two minutes, and I am a highly trained professional in these matters.
I came in at 210, folks, two minutes and ten seconds, and here it is.
This is unexpected, but it's a thrill.
I um, on behalf of Rush Revere and his talking horse liberty, time traveling.
I want to thank all the children who voted and who've read the books.
And I have to tell you how they came about.
The late Vince Flynn, noted thriller author, had been after me to write another book I'd written two previously, way back in the early 90s.
And it was one of those things.
I said, Ah, Vince, I've uh I've done that, not really excited about doing it.
He kept pushing me and he kept pushing me to do it.
Finally, my wife Catherine said, you know, you really care about history.
You care about people learning American history and about kids learning American history.
Why don't you write some kids' books?
Why don't you try that?
And that lit my fire because I've never done that before.
That was a new challenge.
That was something to try, and it was invigorating, and it was something about which I'm very, very passionate.
I love America.
I wish everybody did.
I hope everybody will.
It's one of the most fascinating stories of human history.
This country and what it has meant to the world and what it means to citizens who live here.
And it's a delight and it's an opportunity to try to share that story with young people so that they can grow and learn to love and appreciate the country in which they're growing up and will someday run and lead and inherit.
So I want to thank everybody that's made this possible.
It genuinely is a thrill.
This is a tremendous event.
I'm so honored by this.
I'm honored to be here among all of you and all of the other nominees for this and the other categories.
It's just a wonderful evening, and I Thank everybody who had anything to do, particularly the kids who voted in every category.
It is a great project that you have going here.
Children's literacy to expand it.
And the organization and the work that you're doing is just profound, and I'm honored and humbled to be a small little part of it.
Thank you all very much.
This is tremendous.
And it was, folks, it was.
It was uh it was a big deal.
It it it really was, it was a much bigger deal than I thought it was going to be.
And I don't don't I don't mean to imply that I thought it was uh uh small and insignificant.
It just it was so well done, highly professional, uh, and this group is uh very serious about their charter, which children's literacy.
And to win this award, I'm saying it's a very humbling thing because the the readers, uh kids vote, and it's such great feedback.
I have to think of them there there's a mission uh behind these books, and that is to teach the truth of the American history to people.
I I I do.
I love this country.
I do wish everybody did.
There are parts of me that don't understand people that don't like this country.
The intellectual side of me understands why when you factor ideology and so forth.
But it is without parallel.
This country in human history is as unique as anything in human history is.
It's worth appreciating.
It's worth learning the truth about.
And that's getting harder and harder to do.
Everything's politicized these days and everything has an agenda, it seems.
And the truth of American history doesn't need to be changed.
It doesn't need to be jazzed up.
It doesn't need to be colored in any way.
It doesn't need to be exaggerated in order for it to make an impact.
American history is profound.
The people who came here originally, discovered, founded, explored, built this country are some of the most incredible people who've ever lived.
And they are worth knowing.
What they did is worth understanding and appreciating.
And that's the objective of these books.
They have this time-traveling horse, which is able to take Rush Revere, the official icon of Tuif by Tees, the substitute teacher.
And they're able to go anywhere in American history.
That's the vehicle that was created to write the books.
And the reader is taken to each seminal event and is part of the event while it's happening with the prominent figures in American history explaining why they're doing what they're doing, why they're devoted to what they're devoted to.
They're adventures.
Time travel adventures with exceptional Americans is exactly what it is.
And the reader is taken right to these events.
And the people that made these events, that made them possible, the people that live these events, relive them for the reader.
And what we found is that people, adults, are reading the books and learning things they didn't know.
We got a call yesterday from grandparents who are reading with their children and grandchildren.
It's just the exact mission.
And to be recognized after just first book like this by this group...
Uh is uh I'm I'm highly appreciative.
And I have to give a shout out to to Robin Adelson, the again the executive director of the children's book council, every child a reader.
She put the event together and she uh she ran it and it came off without a hitch.
It was exceptionally well done.
And it was I just when I was up there on stage and I was I was going through my remarks, you know, I was I was I was mental picture of all of you, uh knowing that you were gonna eventually hear what I said.
I wanted to make sure that I got the appreciation out, uh, so that everybody understood that I know why I won.
And I really take the occasion here of my my program today to thank you again deeply.
Catherine does too.
It's you know, there's a lot of people that put these uh these books together, the illustrators, a lot of research to get it right.
Uh this these books are not something that just one person uh could do effectively.
One person could do it, but but not effectively.
I couldn't illustrate it, so one person couldn't do it.
Uh And we have a lot of people contributing here to make these things as accurate and as good.
There's a lot of editing that goes on, a lot of rewriting.
And it's it's all a labor of love because it's a passion that everybody involved cares about, and that is this country and having everybody, as many people as possible, learn to love and appreciate the genuine profundity that is the United States of America.
And to be recognized like this, that's that to me was big.
We're just we're thrilled, and I uh take the occasion here to thank everybody again.
Now, brief time out.
We've got all kinds of things in the news.
Do you know do you know that Barbara Walters was seriously thinking of Monica Lewinsky to replace her on The View?
Monica Lewinsky and Barbara Walters Barbara Walters says so.
That's the source for it.
Barbara Walters hints that ABC approached Monica Lewinsky about co-hosting The View.
Warren Buffett's 1.2 billion dollars lifetime donations to the pro-choice movement.
Some people have run the numbers.
They found out that's enough to abort the entire city of Chicago.
That's how many abortions Warren Buffett has paid for.
With his donations.
Enough to abort the entire city of Chicago.
The Miami Dolphins player Don Jones, who tweeted horrible after the kiss on TV between Michael Sam and his boyfriend Vito, has been sent to sensitivity training.
The Dolphins.
Let's see, did they find him?
Yeah, Don Jones, he tweeted, oh my God, OMG, uh, and thought the whole thing was horrible.
Yeah, he was fined and suspended from all team activities until he completes educational training.
He is going to re-education camp sensitivity.
This is creepy.
This is just creepy stuff.
That's that's creepier than I mean, some people found the kiss creepy.
I wouldn't.
He's too old to go to re-educate.
You can't send Sterling away.
They gotta keep Sterling on TV as often as they can.
They're not going to send Sterling to re-education camp.
I mean, he's he's 81.
It's too late to resensitize him.
He's useful as one of these buffoons on TV every day, but the Dolphins player's been sent the re-education camp.
That's creepy.
That is creepy stuff to me.
And by the way, we found out, ladies and gentlemen, get this.
Oprah, her network is called Own, OWN.
She's made a reality TV deal with Michael Sam and his boyfriend, and the cameras, they were already rolling on the reality show that it's gonna be of Michael Sam and his boyfriend.
So the cameras were rolling.
That means you know my theory on cameras.
I take a break.
I just see the clock.
I'll give you my theory on cameras.
You probably remember when we get back.
Don't go along.
And we're back.
El Rushbow here on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
Now, my theory of cameras is that they change what otherwise would normally happen if they weren't there.
You go to any street corner, go to any person's house, go anywhere.
You put a camera, a single camera, and you forever change what otherwise would happen.
If everybody knows the camera's there.
They immediately start playing to it, immediately get self-conscious, immediately start thinking about how they're gonna look, how do they look, how do they sound, what should they should not say?
Don't doubt me on this.
It takes a long time to forget that a camera is someplace.
That's why, you know, reality shows are not real.
The only difference, I've been on them, folks.
The only difference in a reality show and any other TV show is that the writers for reality shows are not union.
I've been on a reality show where there were five and six takes of an event.
I said, wait a minute, I thought this was a reality.
Well, it is.
Well, then why did what just happened not work?
Well, it could be done better.
But I thought it was a reality show.
Well, it is.
Well, no, it's not.
If we're having to redo it.
And they get all flustered.
So my my point is that we were told that everything that happened when Michael Sam's draft pick was announced was spontaneous.
It couldn't have been because there were cameras there.
Oprah's reality show cameras were rolling.
And so they had already fought people, not just Sam and his boyfriend.
Everybody there had thought about what they were going to do.
Whether they wanted to or not, you can't help it, is my point.
It's not charging anything conspiratorial here.
And it's why, if I may be so bold, it's why there really is no such thing as a reality show.
There's no such thing as reality TV.
The only way, the closest that you ever got to real reality TV was a candid camera.
Whatever the camera is there.
You you've seen this.
I'm sure you've seen it, even when it's not professional.
When somebody starts videoing a family gathering, there's acting involved.
Everybody starts behaving in ways they wouldn't otherwise behave.
So Oprah's cameras being there, the only point is that it was not totally spontaneous.
I don't care what it was, it's not the point, but it's just they're not being up front.
Now, Snerdley asked me what goes on at re-education camp, sensitivity training.
How do I know?
I've never been sent.
Your guiding light to times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos.
Yes, all of that, and even the good times when you find them.
I'm here, El Rushbow.
As long as I'm here, it doesn't matter where here is.
The why has been established on the IRS Tea Party scandal.
New IRS emails describe Washington direction of the targeting of the Tea Party efforts.
This is a Washington examiner, but it's everywhere now.
Because Judicial Watch obtained some documents that illustrate active direction from the Washington office of the IRS in targeting Tea Party and other conservative nonprofit applicants during the 2010 and 2012 campaigns,
the emails obtained by uh the Freedom of Information Act, a request for that.
I mean, maybe maybe these House committees ought to go that route rather than demanding the regime submit documents.
Let's go the Freedom of Information Act route.
So here's what we know now.
The two rogue agents in the Cincinnati office who were acting on their own was alive.
Just like a video nobody saw was responsible for the Benghazi attack was alive.
Just like you can keep your doctor and your health insurance policy if you like them was alive.
Just like Dingy Harry saying that Mitt Romney was a tax cheat was a lie.
By the way.
You know, everybody's talking about Donald Sterling being early onset dementia out of it, KCK Sim.
Somebody needs to seriously examine Harry Reid.
This man has got Coke brother itis.
I don't know what else you would call it.
Dingy Harry has now suggested a constitutional amendment to limit the Koch brothers' influence.
I mean, he's just is over the edge now on this.
I mean, they're trying to use the Koch brothers as the personification of the 1%.
The personification, he just said the other day, last week, that they, the Koch brothers, are responsible for global warming.
Quick, somebody tell the consensus of scientists.
Because they're not blaming it on the Koch brothers.
They're blaming it on America at large.
But this obsession that Harry Reed has, it's bordering the obsession at CNN had with the missing Malaysian airline flight.
He just he just now stuck in this groove and he won't leave it.
And this is a common thing that happens to older people when dementia starts to set in.
Dingy Harry said yesterday he would bring a constitutional amendment to the floor, granting Congress the ability to set strict new limits on campaign contributions.
And he warned that he will force multiple votes if necessary to pass the measure.
He rejected concerns from a lot of Democrats that his focus on the Koch brothers has done nothing to help the Democrats.
Dingy Harry said to Koch brothers, I'm not walking away from them.
I'm going to be on their tail for the whole campaign, because if they think Romney was watched closely by me, that's nothing compared to what it's going to be like with the Koch brothers.
They're spending money in state party races.
They're going after secretaries of state.
They want to do everything they can to suppress voting.
They want to do everything they can to go back to that 1980 campaign.
And of course, that's all a lie.
I happen to know the Koch brothers.
This is, folks, this is not normal.
I mean, even for somebody playing a political card here, even for somebody that thinks they're onto a hot political issue, but he's not.
This is not working.
Other Democrats are right.
Nobody knows who the Koch brothers are, and very few people care.
The Koch brothers have not done anything to anybody.
There's no evidence whatsoever to back up, I mean, none to back up what Harry Reid is saying about them.
The other day, he said, well, no, he was asked about Sheldon Adelson.
Sheldon Adelson is a very, very, very wealthy casino mogul.
Las Vegas Sands.
Got casinos in Las Vegas and in Macau, not far from Hong Kong and Kowloon.
But he lives in Nevada.
He's the guy that gave Newt $10 million in a last-ditch effort for Newt to show well in the Republican primaries in 2012.
I think it was $10 million.
It could have been $10 billion, $10 billion.
I don't know.
It was a lot of money.
And Dingy Harry was asked to, but oh no, no, Sheldon, he's okay.
No problem with Sheldon.
And immediately, okay, what has Sheldon done for Dingy Harry?
Because there's no difference.
I mean, Sheldon Adelson would be a bigger target for Dingy Harry than the Koch brothers, just normal everyday give and take in politics.
But I'm telling you, this is this is border.
This is not.
If if Harry Reid was a relative of yours, you would be having private family discussions about what to do.
And I don't know that the Democrats are not doing that.
This is this is not helping them.
It isn't productive.
It's obsessive.
It's manic.
It's obsessive compulsive.
It's codependent.
It's all of those new age highfalutin terms.
So Dingy Harry now, despite what we're looking at, the IRS targeting the Tea Party, the IRS, the Washington office, there was nothing about this rogue agents in Cincinnati thing that was true.
This came, Lois Lerner is hip-deep in this stuff.
This stuff was going on from the Washington office.
Here in a July 2012 email, Holly Paws, who was then director of the IRS rulings and agreement division, asked an IRS lawyer, Stephen Grodnitsky, to quote, let Cindy and Sharon know how we've been handling Tea Party applications in the last few months, close quote.
Cindy Thomas, the former director of the IRS exempt organization's office of Cincinnati.
Shannon Camarillo, the senior manager to Los Angeles office.
And the email conflicts with claims by the regime that the targeting effort was done exclusively by the government workers in the Cincinnati.
And they've stuck to that throughout all of this.
And this just puts the lie to it.
So there's that big news, and a lot of people are really all excited about what happened to Jill Abramson yesterday.
Jill Abramson.
What was she?
The managing editor of the New York Times, the first female managing editor of the New York Times.
And she was fired.
They tried to talk her into going along the idea that she resigned.
They asked her to show up at the meeting with the staff, or they announced her replacement, the first African American managing director, Dean Bakay.
But she wouldn't go along with it.
She got canned.
And she put out a story.
You wouldn't believe the stack of stuff just on Jill Abramson today.
And it's if she would have just read her own paper, she might have been able to avoid this.
There were stories about what women who want to raise should do, how they should go about it.
Don't do it yourself.
You'll come across as pushy, have a lawyer do it for you, have a third party do it.
The New York Times has had story after story of advice for women on how to get a raise.
She didn't do anything.
According to the news, anyway, that her paper had published previously.
Her previous editor, she replaced Bill Keller, and she claimed that she found out that he was making more and had a better pension.
So she went and she demanded equal pay.
Is this not juicy?
Here you've got the regime last week or two weeks ago on income inequality and this pay gap between men and women, and here's the I mean the House organ, the gospel.
The Bible of liberalism.
The most powerful employee outside ownership in the New York Times claims that she is a victim of pay discrimination.
So the Times management got in gear real fast.
No, no, no, no, no.
She was not paid significantly less than Keller.
Remember, Keller had been here a lot longer than she had been here.
And that's why Keller's pension was bigger than hers was.
Keller had been here a long, long time.
So they kind of swatted that away.
I must tell you, I uh I first saw this, I was gathering news, even doing show prep on the flight up to New York to the uh children's book awards, and I saw a picture accompanying this story, and I thought it was Hillary.
And I saw New York Times managing editor out, and I thought I thought the picture was that they had hired Hillary for the gig.
And then I said, no, no, it's Jill Abramson.
I apologize if that offends anybody.
I'm just telling you, I thought the picture of Jill Abramson was Hillary when I first glanced at it.
Then a little bit more time I discovered it wasn't Hillary, but I saw why I could think that.
Anyway.
So it's sort of it's sort of Shadden Freude, isn't it?
I mean, here these people at times leading the charge on these bogus stories of inequality and pay inequity, men and women, and here is the managing editor of the Bible of the American left, complaining that she was a victim of pay discrimination because she was a woman.
You can't write this stuff.
Well, you can't go work for Obama because he does the same thing.
Obama pays women less than the New York Times does.
Well, she was working for Obama when she was at the Times.
That's the point.
Everybody at the Times is working for Obama.
It's the point.
So anyway, stories have now come up.
Well, the Times is dumping on her.
Now the stories are that little Pinch never liked her.
Pinch Schultzberger, Arthur Schultzberger the third, his dad was called Punch.
So they call him Pinch.
He doesn't like it, by the way.
I don't know why Punch was the nickname for his dad, and I don't know why Pinch, other than it's not Punch, is his nickname.
But the story is not that they never got along.
That there were always fights and management disagreements, and it was it may have been it making it sound like the only reason she got the gig was that she was a woman, and they were trying to be politically correct, or even putters versions of that out there.
And Well, let me tell you something.
I that's not why I remember Jill Abramson.
That's all fine and dandy, and if you if you get a little get some jollies out of all this, which I admit I do too.
I mean, I wouldn't be human.
But I there there's something else I want to remind you of about Jill Abramson.
She has a partner, had a writing partner named Jane Mayer, who is currently at the New Yorker or at New York magazine, one of the two.
I'm always getting uh them confused.
Yeah, that's right.
She complained that her predecessor Bill Keller was being paid more, and I think they bumped her up.
They gave her pretty close to what Keller was making.
They couldn't do the pension thing because he'd been there long, had more time in.
Abramson used to work at the Wall Street Journal, so did Jane Mayer.
But let's let's remember what they did.
They co-authored a smear book about Clarence Thomas.
It was called Strange Justice.
They just set out to destroy Clarence Thomas in this book.
And they tried to portray him as this oversexed, sexually harassing, incompetent, uncle time, illegitimate African American kind of.
It was just vicious what these two did in their book on Clarence Thomas.
And that's who Jill Abramson is to me.
Whether she was a bad manager was bossy, underpaid, fine and dandy, to me, those are just distractions.
And I don't know whether this is karma things being, you know, coming back and whatever you call justice or what have you.
But uh it that book that they wrote was just hideous.
And I've I've never ever forgotten that book.
Grab a quick phone call.
It's trying to squeeze one in here in the first hour.
Go to Queens.
This is Marie.
Thank you for calling.
It's great to have you here.
Hi.
Yes, uh Rush.
I listened to sm this morning to the dedication of the memorial.
It was very big, very beautiful.
But what I told Mr. Sturdley, where the hell was President Bush, why wasn't his name even mentioned?
You know, I I didn't have the sound up when I watched that, not much of it.
I had it on a TV show.
Oh, his name wasn't mentioned?
He wasn't there, that's for sure.
But his name wasn't even mentioned.
This is the 9-11 museum, right?
Yes.
The dedication of the museum.
Well, I saw Governor Cuomo there.
He's been the first person to speak, or at least his name mentioned.
I'm very upset.
I'd lost a subject.
I have to say she's got a point here.
I have to say you've got a point, Marie.
I I I here's who I saw.
I saw Mayor Doomberg.
I saw Mayor uh de Blase.
I saw Governor Cuomo.
Uh but I you're right.
I didn't hear anything.
Did they mention everybody but President Bush, even his name wasn't mentioned.
Well, you say the event was not political.
Did you it wasn't political, but all the other guys were there.
Well, and I want to ask you about it, not being political.
You you say it was not supposed to be political, but when you were that nobody made any political comments, you didn't get any political vibe from it while you were watching it.
I cried.
That's all I got.
I just wouldn't tear it.
I said, where the hell?
Why why isn't President Bush's name even mentioned?
It's like he didn't exist.
That's an interesting point.
I I I maybe I'm crazy.
Maybe it's me.
I don't know.
Yeah, I I heard she lost her son on 9-11.
Yes, I did.
He was a fireman.
And uh that's why you you're more.
now don't don't misunderstand.
I'm just trying to learn how you think here.
Why were you were you expecting to hear President Bush's name mentioned and why?
Well, I thought he'd even be there.
I don't I uh everybody else was there from everybody concerned with that day was there.
Giuliani, you you name it.
Well, his office put out a statement, Marie, that he was invited to the dedication of a museum, but that he had a scheduling conflict and couldn't make it.
Oh well, I really don't believe that.
Well, then it but it it's his office that that is uh Yes, I know saying that.
Well, it's Marie, I appreciate the call.
Uh thanks.
Thanks for you know, people that lost family and loved ones in 9-11.
I know a couple.
They s what the term closure, there still isn't any for a lot of people.
And there may not be for a while.
Somebody said Jill Abramson was getting treatment for her management problems.
What?
Sensitivity training?
She they they were having big problems.
But they fired her anyway, even though she was in treatment.
It was just getting warmed up, folks.
Just getting started.
So happy to have you along here today.
The fastest three hours in media, Rush Limbaugh.
And the EIB network.
Take a brief time out here at the top.
▲
Export Selection