All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 27, 2014 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:43
January 27, 2014, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I was not teasing.
I was not kidding.
I was not making this up.
Right, here it is in the Washington Examiner.
First lady, Muchel Obama, is seeking $10 donations to protect Obamacare, her husband's troubled health insurance system.
Just one day before he gives the annual state of the coup address.
The first lady sent out a fundraising email to supporters hoping to use the speech to prompt donations to help Democrats in the midterm elections this fall.
So before Barack gives his state of the coup address tomorrow, chip in $10 or more and help protect Obamacare.
Now, never mind the fact it is bankrupting the country.
Never mind the fact that it is causing people's health expenses, both treatment and insurance, to skyrocket.
It's not enough.
And now the program is hanging by a thread, they want you to believe, because of the Republicans.
And so they need you to send $10 to help protect Obamacare.
That just says it all.
What did this fundraiser where you have to eat first before you show up to it?
Anyway, a piece here at a website called Sports on Earth, and it's written by Gwen Knapp.
It's about Aaron Andrews, the Fox Sports Sideline Infobabe.
And it asks the question, is she just too pretty to be taken seriously?
As soon as Richard Sherman ranted into the Fox microphone held by Aaron Andrews last week, blame was due to come her way.
The criticism would be absurdly stereotypical, almost as it was for Sherman.
He'd heard the blunt thug.
She would be implicitly tagged a bimbo.
Somebody help me.
Wait a second.
What is that?
Somebody, somebody is using a copper EIB microphone.
Look at that on Fox.
We have the exclusive of the golden EIB microphone.
That looks like it's not actually gold, but it's made to look like it, isn't it?
Don't tell me that.
It's silver, just the lighting.
No way.
No way.
That is, in fact, it's this exact microphone.
Well, not quite this exact, but it's damn close, though.
But it does look like an EV.
You know, it's just, it's just incredible.
Well, anyway.
Have you heard anybody complaining about Aaron Andrews in this whole Richard Sherman thing?
I haven't.
So where is this coming from?
Here, Andrews' beauty has always made her a suspicious character, so much so that it's impossible for many people to judge her work fairly.
When Kevin Harlan of CBS Sports had time to think about the Sherman frenzy, he decided it was partly, maybe entirely, Andrew's fault.
He called her reaction drama queenish and suggested that she may have provoked Sherman.
Well, that's not.
If anything, she looked a little taken aback.
I think just shy of scared.
But professionally scared, not personally threatened, scared, professionally scared, thinking, uh-oh, I've got an out-of-control circumstance here.
What do I do?
Didn't take it any other way.
And then Kevin Harlan clarified what he said: Well, nobody's demanding beauty and sexiness from, say, Chris Berman or Joe Buck or Stuart Scott.
Yet it seems, bottom line, women with sex appeal have an inside track over women with fantastic knowledge and poise, but say a belly.
Oh man, here we go.
Undeniable truth of life number 24.
Here it is, Kevin Harlan complaining that it's the attractive bimbos that get the gigs, and that there are substantive but fat women, that's what a belly means, who are not getting the gigs.
And it's not fair.
So we're back to it.
Inequality here, folks.
Again, inequality.
This is one of these things.
You've got the attractive versus the ugly.
The ugly are being discriminated against because they're ugly, apparently.
Silly season, it is.
Back to the audio sound bites.
This is Wolf Blitzer on Friday night, Situation Room.
His guest is New Yorker magazine Washington writer Ryan Lizza.
During a discussion about the New Yorker magazine interview with Obama, where he blamed me and Fox News, Wolf Blitzer and Lizza had this little back and forth.
I'm not the caricature that you see on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but I'm somebody who is interested in solving problems and is pretty practical.
What did that tell you?
Those comments from the president?
I mean, it tells me that he's accepted reality.
I do think one of my big criticisms of Obama is that his analysis of American politics back from 2004 to 2008 was flawed.
He really believed that the polarization in this country was something that any president could overcome.
Look at how Bill Clinton was treated by the conservatives.
You know, this is amazing.
When I hear these people talk about the world in which they work and the world in which they live, I am continually, and I ought not be, but I'm continually surprised.
So this guy, Ryan Lizza, thinks that Obama misjudged American politics 2004 to 2008.
He really believed that polarization in this country, why were we polarized in 2004 to 2008?
Why was the country, who did it?
Who did it?
Who did the polarization?
Who polarized this country?
George Bush won re-election handily in 2004.
What happened in the next four years?
The Democrats started their body count with the war in Iraq.
The Democrats started their campaign to lose the war in Iraq.
The Democrats started a campaign about how mean and rotten and all that Bush was.
The Democrats began a campaign to try to convince people we were in a depression or a recession.
The Democrats basically began a campaign to destroy George W. Bush, and the media was right in there helping him, perhaps leading it.
That's what caused the polarization.
They did it on purpose.
The Democrats thrive on polarization.
That is what's so frustrating when we hear people like McCain or Christie or you pick your favorite Republican say, we need to work these people.
We need to cross the aisle.
They don't want to work with you.
They thrive on the polarization.
Because the polarization, what is polarization?
Polarization, yeah, people taking sides, but polarization and the current modern manifestation of it is hatred of Republicans.
That's what the polarization is.
Okay, so that's the bottom line: hatred of Republicans.
Now, here comes Obama complaining that not everybody hates the Republicans.
And why?
Me.
If I weren't doing what I was doing, Obama would have free reign and everybody would hate the Republicans.
And then he wouldn't have any opposition and there wouldn't be any polarization.
It's like I've always said, there is no controversy on this program because everybody listening to it agrees.
So what controversy?
They've always called me controversial.
I'm only controversial of people that are threatened by me.
Or, and it's much the same who disagree with me.
Partisanship in this country is translated as hatred of Republicans.
That's what the partisanship is.
Therefore, it's up to the Republicans to stop being hated.
How do they do that?
Do what Democrats want them to do.
And that's why you and I get so damn frustrated with Republicans falling for this, accepting the blame.
They're the reasons for the partisanship.
And then they have to fix it by agreeing with Democrats.
And then the problem is the partisanship never goes away, does it?
The hatred of Republicans never goes away, no matter what Republicans do.
You couldn't get a bigger shout out than what Obama got from Chris Christie.
You couldn't get a bigger assist in a presidential election than Chris Christie gave Obama.
And what are they trying to do to Chris Christie?
Take him out.
Chris Christie, I'm sure, thought that he was buying some insurance.
He was bipartisan, state to protect, big disaster.
Obama's got the money.
Work with Obama, walk hand in hand, arm in arm, down the boardwalk, and show we can work together.
And here they're suppeding everybody they can to try to get Christie thrown out of office over traffic jam.
A traffic jam.
That's not how it's supposed to happen, right?
Christie's supposed to be loved by the Democrats now.
Partisanship is the practiced art of ginning up hatred and dislike for Republicans and conservatives.
That's all it is.
And so whoever stands in the way of Republicans being universally despised and hated, it would be me and I guess Fox News, then we become a problem.
So what Lizza is saying here is, you know, you know, Wolf, I'll tell you, the president has accepted that he can't overcome Rush Limbaugh.
He misjudged American politics.
The president thought that he could be the first president ever to bridge the gap, to unify the people.
That's not, Obama didn't want that.
That wasn't his purpose.
I mean, if that had happened, that would have been great from his standpoint because of how it had happened and what it would mean.
But he wasn't trying to unify people in the way people who voted for him to unify us thought.
That's not his, Obama's definition of unity is eliminating opposition, not agreeing with them and peacefully coexisting with them.
It's eliminating them.
And what Lizza is saying here, president's come to realize he can't eliminate them.
The president has realized here that he wanted to change the world and finally get rid of Republicans as a serious body of opponents, opposite, but he can't do it.
Later on, same show, situation room.
Wolf Blitzer is got Gloria Borger on.
Gloria Borger heard what you just heard and then she reacted.
When President Obama was elected, the hope was great in this country.
And I think the president himself has told people that he was surprised at the extent of the opposition that he faced.
He shouldn't have believed that Republicans were going to roll over, which is why I would argue that perhaps he should have gone about dealing with Republicans, you know, in a different way.
So Gloria Borger says that Obama should never have believed the Republicans would roll over, or he should never have believed that he had the messianic power to make them roll over and go away.
But of course, they have, in many ways, rolled over and gone away.
That's what's, I mean, the Republicans are leading the charge for amnesty now.
The drive-bys and everybody talk about how amnesty is dead for 2014.
Not if the Republicans have anything to say about it.
He should have dealt with the Republicans in a different way.
What, throw him in jail?
What's the different way?
What could he have done differently, Gloria, that he hasn't done?
I mean, he's just this, like a couple inches shy at criminalizing being a Republican.
What else could he have done?
Do we have any more on this?
I know we do.
Yes, we do, folks.
Sit tight.
Oh, this is great.
This is great.
Let me take a break so I don't leave you with a 90-second segment here at the bottom of the hour.
Up next is Howard Kurtz, who can't believe any of this.
Back up.
Folks, I got to get some phone calls in here.
I have to be polite.
I just have to do that.
People have been waiting since the program started.
And so we'll do the Howard Kurtz soundbites about me and Obama and all that coming up just second here.
New York Daily News Today, back page cover.
It's a picture of cornerback Richard Sherman of the Seahawks.
The headline, the mouth that bored.
Sherman had a press conference after the Seahawks arrived, and he acted like an adult.
And the media is depressed.
Media is disappointed, let down, and bored.
Because Sherman didn't give him what they were.
I never forget.
I've watched a, it was one of those awards, Academy Awards, MTV.
No, it must have been, no, it couldn't have been MTV.
It was some award show, and there was no political controversy, and the F-bomb didn't drop, and the media the next day wrote about what a boring show.
Might have been the MTV award show.
So the media is not helping folks in our quest to reclaim our culture.
The media is begging for cultural depravity to report on and to be entertained by.
So Sherman comes out.
He's very responsible, respectful toward the Broncos, respectful of his opportunity, honest about the task that lay ahead, and it's a yawner.
Ho-hum.
Well, Richard, it was fun while it lasted, but you're worthless to us now.
You better get back to being a thug, or we're not going to have any interest in you.
Meanwhile, Dave in Senecaville, Ohio.
It's great to have you on the EIB network.
Dave, hi.
Hey, how you doing?
Good.
Hey, I was telling Mr. Stewart I was listening to your idea about doing this show.
Basically, you're making fun.
Well, I think it would be something that would be fantastic to do.
You've got enough people and enough talent.
There's probably some other people in the radio world that would love to join you.
Give me a pay-per-view.
I'd pay to see it and think it would be a fantastic fundraiser for the military or for whoever you would want to make it.
So you're saying you would pay to watch a show like that.
Oh, more would I ever.
I refuse to watch those shows on TV because I'm like you.
I really do believe that they're making fun of people.
I mean, they are.
Well, we're talking about two different things here, but like the Grammys last, it's clear what they're doing to me.
And the same thing with the Academy Awards.
You get New York and L.A. and then Flyover Country, and they make fun of the people in Flyover Country, which is the bulk of the audience, or they laugh at them, or they purposely try to offend them.
That's what they're trying to do.
Just love it.
They make fun of their own audience.
It's exactly what's going to try to shock their own audience so that their own audience is talking the next day about what a bunch of reprobates or whatever they are, and they're laughing all the way to the bank doing this.
But the second thing he's saying here, Dave and Senecaville, Ohio, would pay to see my idea of the revamp of the White House Correspondence Center made in the image of the Grammys or the People's Choice Awards or the Epidemic Awards or whatever.
I'll go through it again.
But the problem is, you couldn't get people in Washington to do it if they didn't participate.
You could do it.
But the thing that makes the Grammys the Academic Awards Worker Academy is that it's the actual performers that are being awarded or nominated that make the show, that participate.
My idea is to totally redo the White House Correspondence Dinner with awards for biggest fraud of the year, best recovery from a scandal, best lie for a successful purpose, best supporting lie, largest secret donor contributions, biggest under-the-table payoff, best hoax of the year, most insincere apology.
If we did a show with awards like that, oh, can you imagine?
And it would be real.
That's how people look at politics.
Instead of this phony one-night get-together where people that hate each other's guts act like they all love each other and they're all on the same team, which actually may be more truthful than we know.
But for my purposes, they put together this boring little show.
I mean, the most exciting thing about the White House Correspondence Dinner is who the prettiest actress is that shows up and at whose table.
And the politicians are sitting there, saliva just dropping to the floor from their open mouths as they're salivating because politics showbiz for the ugly.
I just came to the conclusion, those Grammys last night, say what you want about it.
They were more substantive than anything in politics is.
Politics, phony, plastic banana, good time rock and roll.
At least these people were really being given awards for serious achievements.
I mean, they had sold items.
They sold best song, best album, best record, whatever.
Anyway, let's go to Brian Winterport, Maine.
You're next, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hey, Rush, first time, long time.
Thank you, sir.
Hello.
I have a wonderful idea.
In addition to your children of equality, I think the government should require that the parents pay for the children to stay intoxicated at home and pay for the video games until the children are at least 30.
Why 30?
Well, I don't think 26 is long enough on the health insurance, which should be extended as well.
Well, let's not forget what we're doing here.
Now, the president and his, this is why, ladies, I'm trying to be as nice so I can be here.
So I have always said for 25 years, don't try this at home.
It invariably happens.
I, as do all accomplished, great people, make what they do look easy.
Anybody thinks they can do it.
It's a brilliant idea today to illustrate the president's quest to solve the problem of inequality.
And Brian here, a great guy, loyal member of the audience, wants to add to the idea with his own suggestions, which is cool, which is fine and dandy.
But part of what he said might take under advisement.
Somebody's got to pay for the kids to stay high and watch videos.
Ladies and gentlemen, a point of clarification.
I don't want anybody misunderstanding here.
I'm not issuing a stamp of approval about the Grammy show substance.
It was horrible.
It was despicable.
That's not my point.
My point is that whatever was going on in the show, the people that were given awards got them on the basis of substance.
They sold more records.
They had whatever the criteria.
Now, as for the show itself, A.J. McCarron, the former quarterback at Alabama, he's getting ready for the NFL draft.
Now, I don't know why what A.J. McCarron thinks made the news, but I'm glad that it did.
It's a Breitbart story.
Former Alabama quarterback A.J. McCarron, prepping for the NFL draft, was watching the Grammys on Sunday and felt that the really demonic performances showed that there is a lot of evil in the world.
Katie Perry dressed up as a witch and was burned at the stake in her act while gay couples were married to the song Same Love, and that song openly attacked right-wing conservatives and Christians.
I mean, that's the point of these shows.
I mean, let's face it, people all over the country buy music.
People from all political stripes buy music.
These people feel the need to go out and mock, insult, and lampoon their audience.
That's what these shows have become.
They're trying to offend you.
They're trying to get a rise out of you.
They think you're a bunch of square hicks, even if you do buy their music.
And of course, they're also currying favor with other people in their industry.
The old cocktail party routine.
It's why CNN still matters.
Nobody watches, but because they have not strayed from the liberal path, they're still loved and adored and praised for courage and sticking to it despite losing everything.
They have not watered down the liberalism they're hanging in as such.
They're the latest failure to be given a resume enhancement.
It says here, it is unclear what performance prompted the tweet from A.J. McCarran.
He later retweeted a response in which one of his followers wrote, I know, right?
I can only imagine what Katie's preacher father is thinking.
And other performances included Jay-Z grabbing his wife Beyonce's butt on stage, and then the artists Mecklemore and Ryan Lewis singing same love during the mass wedding.
And it's amazing, Justin Bieber wasn't even there, folks.
And all of this stuff still happened.
But it's clear what's going on.
Don't misunderstand me.
I'm not sanctioning or approving the content.
The content of these shows long ago has been in the gutter, and they just keep digging deeper.
But I know why.
I know why.
I know exactly what they're doing.
Folks, as conservatives, we are despised.
We literally are hated because we have sound principles and guardrails, if you will.
And we have definite beliefs in right and wrong and good and evil and how to best raise families and live lives.
And it just doesn't comport with anything they believe.
And so it is just, we are a big threat.
We are just a huge threat to these people.
And this is them striking back.
You know, the left, politicians are entertained, they will always tell you what they fear.
And that's all that's going on there.
But that's not my, my, my point is simply Grammys, Academy Awards, whatever.
Whatever's happening there on stage in terms of the show, the awards themselves are substantive.
They're real.
You may disagree with them and all that, but that's not happening in politics.
The White House Correspondence Dinner needs to become an award show in the same vein as the Grammys, the Academy Award.
That's all I was saying.
And then I made what I think is rather compelling idea.
I think, I think we get 50 million people to watch it.
Maybe more.
50 million might be the floor.
But we'd have to get all those people to participate.
And you never know, as eager as they are to get on TV, politicians and cameras and all that, they might at some point do it.
The winners wouldn't show up, I guarantee you that.
Best hoax, best lie in a supporting role.
The winners, somebody would have to show up and pick up the award for them because they'd be busy working on the next lie and couldn't make the show.
Back to the audio soundbites.
Just to illustrate this, this is Howie Kurtz on Fox News Sunday morning, Fox and Friends Sunday.
And Howie's got his own media analysis show on Fox called Media Buzz, talking about this New Yorker magazine in which Obama blamed me and to a lesser extent Fox News for the reason he can't get his message out.
And Clayton Morris is the co-host interviewing Kurtz.
And he said, this New Yorker piece, where the president's going back to the trough to say once again, the reason he can't get his message out there is because of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh said the issue's been the inability of my message to penetrate the Republican base so that they feel persuaded.
I'm not the caricature that you see on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but I'm somebody who's interested in solving problems and is pretty practical.
Basically, if you don't watch Fox News, then America's ills will be solved.
And here's Kurtz.
I can't understand why President Obama keeps going there.
This is at least the fifth or sixth time that he's taken a whack at Fox and at Rush Limbaugh.
And while it might please his liberal base, what is he really saying?
He really is saying that even though I have the most powerful megaphone in the world to get my message out in a million different ways, one cable news network and one radio talk show host are ruining my reputation.
Yeah, but Howie, previous sound bites that we've aired today from Hillary Rosen and others, Ryan Lizzie, say he's entirely justified in this.
Howie, check it out.
Others are saying he's totally legitimate in having this feeling, this thought that he's right.
Same network, different show.
Now, this is to Kurtz's media buzz show.
And he's talking with the managing editor at USA Today, Lauren Ashburn, about the New Yorker interview and how he said he told the New Yorker the issue has been the inability of his message to penetrate the Republican base.
So they feel persuaded that he's not the caricature you see on Fox News or Rush Limbaugh, but instead he's somebody interested in solving problems and is pretty practical.
So Howie, after weighing in earlier on his incredulity at all this, and then asked the USA Today, babe, what she thinks.
If I were in his inner circle, I would say, knock it off.
You sound like a crybaby here, and you're giving Fox and Rush Limbaugh ammunition against you.
I mean, this is the fifth or sixth time by my count that the president has brought up.
And look, he may really be esteemed, what Rush Limbaugh says about him.
There has been a lot of criticism on Fox News, but doesn't he have a pretty big megaphone himself?
See, this is where these people don't get it.
This is where his people don't get it.
People like Howard.
I mean, they don't understand Obama.
They really don't understand who he is and what makes him tick and why he'd be mad at something like this.
They are looking at it as though they were president and I would be, you know, a yapping chihuahua at their ankles.
They wouldn't have time, couldn't care less.
What does it matter?
A guy on the radio, cable news networks.
So what?
Obama, if there's any opposition at all, it's intolerable.
It's not permitted.
It's not something to be accepted.
It's something that has to be dealt with.
And it's a little bit more involved than that.
Here's Bob Beckle.
This is Friday night on the five on Fox, Eric Bowling.
Said the issue, they quote him again, blaming me in Fox News.
They said, Bob, why can't this man get us and Limbaugh out of his mind?
Well, because every day he's getting bludgeoned.
That's probably one reason he can't get it out of his mind.
There are people like me who strongly support Obama in some areas.
But I'll tell you right now, this is not the time to be picking fights with people.
I mean, when you're sitting where you are at the polls right now, the general rule of thumb in politics is let your enemies be quiet.
Try to embrace your friends, but don't attack your enemies.
I've tried to tell my candidates this, and this is the wrong time.
This is just amazing to me.
Honestly, folks, I mean, I probably ought not say any more about this because I don't want to give these people any ideas about how to deal with this.
But this is just flat out stunning.
So here you have Beckle.
Well, I mean, he's justified because Limbaugh's bludgeoning him every day.
He can't get it out of his mind because there are people out there ripping him.
I'll just give you one hint.
My view on if I were president, I don't know that I would have time to be concerned with what's being said about me on the radio or in the media.
Now, I understand presidents get worried about the New York Times and all that, but Obama's a different character.
He's a different creature in this regard.
And it's not hard to understand this at all, but these people are judging him by plugging him into the mold of every previous president in politics.
You can't do that with him until they understand the whole depiction of rules for radicals by Alinsky.
Will never understand what's going on here.
And as such, they really don't understand very much at all about how Obama has been governing and his policies or any of that.
He just gets plugged in.
He's just the latest Democrat president.
He's no different than anybody.
He's just the latest Democrat.
And we're going to have a Republican someday.
They're going to win the next election.
The dead, everything he's done policy-wise, that's just the latest Democrat president.
They really don't get it, folks.
I got to take a break.
We'll get back to more of your phone calls when we get back.
Baba, Dubai.
Okay, so Bob Beckles says that Obama is justified in calling me out.
He's being bludgeoned.
What is being bludgeoned?
How am I bludgeoning Obama?
All I'm doing is holding a mirror up to what he does.
I get bludgeoned, if I may interject this.
All we do is hold him.
Look at, we're not the guy.
We're not the people that told you your health care premium is going to be coming down $2,500 a month.
We're not the ones that told you that two years ago we'd be producing 600,000 jobs a month with our policies.
We're not the ones that told you we're going to fix the roads and the bridges and the schools with a stimulus and are going to get the economy going again.
We're not the ones that told you that all you got to do is work hard and the American dream is yours.
We're not the ones that told you that you could keep your doctor and keep your insurance plan if you like it.
We're not the ones that told you that all we cared about was jobs and that we're laser-like focused on creating jobs.
We're not the ones that started blaming George W. Bush for everything.
And we're not the one.
Here's the, if, folks, if Obama had fixed the roads and bridges and schools, and if unemployment, if we didn't have 92 million people out of work, but if instead the unemployment rate was a genuine 4.7% like it was with Bush, and if everybody who wanted a job had one, and if people were advancing in their careers, it wouldn't matter what I said.
The only reason what I'm saying resonates is because it's true.
And the only place you hear it is here in Fox News.
You don't hear it anywhere else in the media.
And that's what he's really ticked about.
What he's really ticked about is that he doesn't own us and that we tell the truth about what's happening in the country.
We don't let him get away with the fact that he wants you to think he hasn't had any control in five years.
In fact, I'm the one that concocted the Limbaugh theorem to explain to you how he's doing it.
He's not being bludgeoned.
He's just having his claims, promises, commitments measured against reality.
And he's coming up way short.
Nothing that he told you he was going to do has happened.
Nothing has gotten better.
There isn't any green energy revival.
There isn't any new renewable energy.
Nothing.
None of these great things.
The world doesn't love us any more than they hated us when he took office.
He hasn't gotten us out of Klub Gitmo.
He hasn't ended the woe in Afghanistan.
None of it.
But in his world, being honestly critiqued equals being bludgeoned.
And that's got to be stopped.
Here is Nathan in Seattle.
As we go back to the phones.
Hi, Nathan.
Thank you for waiting, and it's great to have you with us.
Hello, we just finished your Russian Revere book Saturday night.
We wanted to call.
My kids wanted to call and say thank you for it.
Well, you're welcome.
I appreciate that.
How old are your kids?
I'm Daniel, and I'm 11.
The crowd launchers are on the phone.
You're Daniel and you're 11.
The 10-year-old, what is your name?
Ammon.
So there's three of you here, and one's six.
Yeah, Samuel, Ammon, and Seth.
And you read the book to them?
Yes.
Well, that's good.
And I assume they like it.
That's why you're.
Oh, right when it first came here, we read the first three chapters, and then they were begging for more.
Is that normal?
No, it was the first book that I actually was able to read, and they were able to sit down and pay attention, and that we were able to actually finish without them getting bored.
And they kept asking you to read it more and more?
Oh, yes.
That's incredible.
That is just incredible.
That's superb.
Well, I'll tell you what, you know, what I do for everybody that calls, because the audio version of the book is out there, too.
And I recorded it.
I'm very fond of it.
I'm very proud of it.
And I want to send you one.
It's four and a half hours.
And if you ever get tired of reading it to them and they still want to hear it, just plug this in.
Plug in the CDs and let them listen to me read the book.
It's an entirely different experience from having read it.
And Nathan, hang on so Snerdly gets your address so we can send you that and send some Ted T-Bears out there too.
And thank you, El Mucho.
Back after this, folks.
Scott Walker has finally made the news.
Scott Walker in Wisconsin finally made the news in the UK Telegraph.
An opera singer is out of work after surgery left her unable to sing without farting.
It's right here.
It's in the UK Independent.
I'm not making it up.
▲
Export Selection