All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:27
July 22, 2013, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Ellie uh Royal Baby is still on the way.
Oh no, it it may it that there's been a birth.
Oh, either.
It's still on the way then.
Still on the way, as they say at CNN.
Anyway, greetings, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
And we welcome now to the uh EIB network.
Liz Cheney, this is uh I don't know, second, third time you've been with us, but this is momentous.
Liz, you're like how are you?
I'm fine.
Your life is going to change dramatically.
You are you are running for the United States Senate.
Now I've I hate to do this.
I have to that I it's it's hardly ever that I admit ignorance, but I have been really off the grid this weekend.
And so some of my questions you may have answered countless times.
I apologize.
Well, good for you for being off the grid.
I always advise you.
You know, it is kind of sweet.
It is it is kind of refreshing.
And I didn't get back in touch with anything until Sunday afternoon.
What is the primary reason you're doing this?
I mean, this is not something you have to do, it's obviously a passion.
What what do you hope to accomplish if you win?
You know, I I'm uh in the race rush because I am very concerned, deeply concerned about uh what's happening in Washington and what it means for the state of Wyoming.
You know, when you look across the board at the encroachment of the federal government into every aspect of our lives, uh whether it is, you know, the massive debt, 17 trillion dollars and growing, rather it whether it's the Environmental Protection Agency and the uh complete uh war on coal, war on fossil fuels, um the EPA's attack on our ag industries.
Uh, you know, this this president, I believe is, you know, the most radical man who's ever inhabited the Oval Office.
And I think that we've gotten to a point in the country where, you know, it's just it's a moment where we all have to decide, are we going to continue, you know, business as usual in Washington?
Are we going to go along to get along here?
Or are we going to stand and fight?
Are we going to say no more?
You know, are we going to say it's not uh obstructionism in this president's policies is patriotism.
When you say go along to get along, are you talking about the Republicans in Washington?
The Republicans.
I think that, you know, you have had uh uh some in Washington who um have not taken the approach that we've got to stand and fight.
They've sort of taken the approach of business as usual.
Um, you know, let's continue to work through kind of the seniority system and and let's continue to um look for ways that we can uh compromise.
And I put compromise in quotes because everybody believes in compromise for the good of the nation.
But you come to a point where compromise is capitulation.
And you know, here in Wyoming, one of the things that people feel very proud of is the code of the West.
Um and the very last line of the code of the West is know when to draw the line.
And I think we've gotten to the point where we've got to draw the line.
We've got to say, look, compromising with this president's radical agenda is only gonna result in a loss of the freedoms and the values and the very nature of of the nation that that we all love so much.
When you look at Washington and look at the current crop, let's keep it to the Senate since that's where you're hopeful hopeful uh next stop is there's a lot of of that.
There are a lot of Republicans, at least it appears, who have chosen the route of compromising with the Democrats or with the President, because it's the path of the least resistance, or because they think that's what the American people really want.
You can go issue by issue by issue, uh health care immigration, any number of things to to illustrate this, and it's really frustrating.
And I heard you say before I went off the grid, uh one of the things that you are going to bring to Washington is this is the end of deal making.
No more deals.
What did you mean?
You know, I think um the problem is uh when you're dealing with opponents like those we have today, this president and his liberal allies in Congress, um, that you know uh compromise for the sake of compromise with them leads us to the place we find ourselves today where we've got Obamacare where the president uh is really trying to kill the coal industry where the president's trying to raise taxes he is raising taxes on everybody where he's trying to nationalize a sixth of the economy with Obamacare
um and you know you have to you have to be able to say all right look I'll go this far and no farther.
And as a conservative as a Republican, I mean, you know, you sh you know better than than most, Rush, that when you stand up and you take a stand and you take the fight to the president, you're gonna get attacked and criticized.
And um most people I suppose you know don don't like that.
It's not pleasant.
Um but you know I I believe strongly that you've got to have the courage of your convictions and you've got to be able to lead.
You know it's not enough just to say I'm gonna s you know put my head down and and vote.
You've got to be able to bring other people around to see you know our way of thinking to see our vision for the future because we're not going to win against this president if we say oh let's you know let's depend on the media to to show the American people all the negative things about him.
It's just not going to work.
We have to mobilize others on our side stand up for what we believe in.
Who in the world in the Republican Party is saying, well let's let the media show the way about Ob who in the world think the media is Obama and Obama is the media.
You know Liz you you come from Republican Party royalty if I can use that phrase.
I mean your your family, your dad, your mom, I mean you're you're you're you, you yourself you're you're from Republican family royalty the Republican Party today I I look at at at certain elements of its leadership and I'm at a loss to understand it.
I see uh and a lot of civilians see that the greatest opportunity we've ever had to contrast what we think and who we are with what is not what theoretically might be if they win.
They did win five years ago and this is what they are and this is what we're gonna get and too many Republicans seem at least at the on on the onset to just simply caved to this to have decided there's no point and nothing to be gained in opposing any of it.
And I I just can't understand it.
I look at Washington today and and feel as distant from it as I ever have.
Yeah no listen I mean I would say first of all I'm a proud constitutional conservative and I I too i i am very worried I share your concerns Rush about our party.
I share your concerns you know when I hear leaders of the Republican Party saying we need to move to the left we need to moderate um you know that is a recipe for disaster.
What we need are people who can stand up and explain why we believe what we believe, why we believe in a limited government and low taxes and a strong national defense and why you know we believe in the free enterprise system because it's raised more people out of poverty than any system that's ever existed.
It's the only system that's going to create opportunity for all.
You know we believe fundamentally in uh the Constitution and its inviolability and we'll fight to defend you know Second Amendment rights and freedom of speech and freedom of religion and all of those things that are under assault from this president.
So I think the Republican Party today has got a lot of very big problems.
And I think you've got a lot of people out there who completely understandably are more willing to identify themselves as conservatives than as Republicans.
And you know it just seems to me that the path forward here is electing strong constitutional conservatives who are going to be faithful to the Constitution and who are going to remember every single day that they work for the people who elected them not people who are going to go back to Washington and try to figure out how they can you know make the leadership in Washington happy with their votes and you know how they can sort of not make waves and not rock the boat.
You know this the situation is simply too grave for us uh not to stand and fight this fight.
If we care about the future, if we care about our kids, if we care about our freedom, we will fight the fight, we'll fight it here and now how did it happen?
I mean I I must be honest and say I'm shocked particularly at the Senate since that's where you're headed.
I'm I'm shocked at at much of what I hear from not just the Senate leadership but from many Republicans in the Senate.
I don't understand what's happened in five years.
I don't and maybe maybe it's been happening uh slowly and and surely and in ways that we haven't seen but I literally know what has happened.
I mean I know that uh as you say there might be fear of being called out.
There might be fear being called a racist, sex is bigot.
There might be fear of the White House coming after you, fear of being primary, fear of whatever.
But I I have never seen the Republican Party this informed by it.
This this inspired and motivated by fear.
I uh the the the uh the I I'm searching it's people ask me what has happened.
I don't know if it's the consultants advising candidates that uh are telling them this is what you have to do to win the independence.
I don't know if it's consultants telling candidates, look the uh I know that there's a war on conservatives in Washington everywhere, Republican Party, Democrat Party, and you're up against that, by the way, doing what you're doing.
But it is a it is a mind boggling thing when you stop and think of all Democrat administrations to compromise with and agree with this one.
This is the least likely for it any of this to happen.
So people are scratching their heads, it doesn't make sense to them.
And this gives birth and gives rise to all these mindless conspiracy theories when there doesn't appear to be a rational explanation why the president has no opposition, essentially in Washington.
You know, I think there's a couple of things going on, Rush.
I think first of all, uh it just happens way too often that when people get back to Washington, you know, they want to be liked by everybody else in Washington.
They want to be praised by people in Washington.
Um, you know, it becomes sort of a club and you want to be in the club.
Um, you know, uh uh that certainly isn't something that that compels me or drives me at all.
Uh and I think secondly, the president is a formidable communicator.
And too many Republicans look at his skills and his talent and they say we just simply can't compete.
And so they seed the playing field.
Or they tell themselves we're gonna compete in another way.
We're just gonna work really hard in another way, but we're not gonna fight the fight with him because my gosh, we might we might get bloodied.
And I I think that the future of the nation, the future of the state of Wyoming is simply too important for that.
And and I certainly, you know, came to the conclusion that I could not sit by the sidelines any longer in the face of the threats, you know, to the very principles on which our nation was founded.
By the way, uh Mike Enzey, current seat holder is uh, I think a friend of your father's.
They fished together.
Uh how how's that going down between your family and the Enzies?
This this uh you know, I have a lot of respect for Mike.
I'm not sure I I think they they may have fished together once.
Um I think that, you know, uh I can tell you that I respect his eighteen years of service to the state.
Um and it's not personal.
Uh you know, this is this is very much about policy and substance in the future.
And I believe it's time for a new generation.
Uh it's time for somebody who will be a strong voice in Washington for Wyoming.
Um so it's it's certainly it's it's not personal.
It's it's about the future and uh and about you know not having the luxury to sit by and wait.
Well, Liz, if if I may editorialize here, I don't I don't want to embarrass you, but I want to tell the audience here that I've I've known you for many, many years, and throughout the entire time I've known you, you haven't changed.
Your conservatism has been consistent and solid, and in fact, it may have uh uh even gotten, if I can use the term stronger, your commitment to it may have even increased.
And not not that it was ever in doubt, but I mean I can I can cite uh numerous times you've been on television as a guest and you have shown everybody how to do it.
For example, one of the favorite things that you uh techniques that you perfected was simply refusing to accept the premise of a typical question a Republican would get.
You showed the way.
And if you do seek this office and and if you succeed in getting it, uh everybody's gonna have their eyes on you and hoping and praying that whatever happens to Republicans in that town does not happen to you.
Because people like you are needed there.
Well, thank you, Rush.
I appreciate that.
And uh I I have to say that, you know, the uh the the admiration uh that that I have for you and for what you've done and for the strength that you've had under A pretty intense barrage at times, you know, not to wither and to stand up for your principles uh is uh is very, very high.
And uh and I appreciate that a lot.
And you can count on the fact that I'm uh I'm not gonna get back there uh, you know, uh and and forget uh who sent me and forget who I work for and the principles uh on which the nation was founded and that we've got to fight for.
Well, I appreciate your call.
I appreciate the time that you've uh you've given us here today.
And uh, you know, we need we need uh let's see.
We've got Ted Cruz and uh a couple of we need about ninety-five more of you.
And we might at least fifty one of you, at least fifty-one of you, and then we'd be talking.
Well, that's uh we got a lot of got a lot of good young people coming up in the party, and uh and I I think uh we're gonna we're gonna give President Obama a fight here and not not let him take this country away from uh the principles on which we were found.
Well, you've mentioned Wyoming, I don't know how many times in our in our chat here, and I did I think I think one of the problems have is that people get elected, they go to Washington, and they want to be liked by the culture there rather than remaining liked and appreciated in their home states or districts.
Don't forget that.
That's you you seem to have that nailed down.
That's that's uh that's crucial.
I mean, you your state is heavily involved in fracking and coal and energy, and the president's targeted everything that keeps that state viable.
Well, you know, we could have an economic renaissance in this country if the president were willing to uh you know allow uh people in states like Wyoming uh to be able to get access to the resources that we have here.
You know, really we could be energy independent, we could have an economic renaissance, but instead, you know, uh uh leases for drilling on federal lands in the Rocky Mountains have reduced seventy percent in the last couple of years.
And uh he's just he he's declared a war uh across the board on fossil fuels.
It's uh it makes no sense for the nation, for our energy needs.
Certainly it kills um thousands of jobs here in Wyoming.
And and you know, it's it's just time for it to end.
It's time for people to stand up and and uh back him off of these policies and and get people across the nation mobilized in order to back him off these policies.
Well, good luck, Liz, and thanks again very much.
Liz Cheney's seeking the Senate seat from Wyoming, currently held by Mike Enze, and we will be back, we'll get to your phone calls, maybe.
Depends on how I feel at the end of the obscene profit timeout.
After all the great things that uh Dick Cheney has done for our country over his long brilliant career.
Liz Cheney might turn out to be one of his biggest contributions of all.
We'll find out.
We go back to the phones.
No, we go to the phones, we start Wichita.
This is Tom.
Thank you for waiting, sir.
As always, great to have you on the program.
Good morning.
Hi.
Uh you stole some of my thunder this morning.
Uh I was going to talk about how he walked to the podium without a teleprompter and uh showed us his true feelings again and and who he represents.
Obama, you mean on Friday.
That is correct.
Yeah.
He uh he had everything to say about Trayvon, but he had nothing to say to his parents, to uh George Zimmerman or George Zimmerman's family or anybody else.
It was uh Well, it could have been him 35 years ago, some such bunk.
Well is it wasn't him 35 years.
It didn't happen to him 35 years ago.
Where was he 35 years ago in Burma?
No, he's in Hawaii.
Hawaii.
With his grandparents having a very good time.
So that was tell you what, you it uh I didn't mean to steal your venom.
Um I usually call it thunder.
But uh if you want to characterize it as venom.
Oh, y he was stirred up.
I mean he stomped in there and uh kind of and it's like you know, when he was speaking uh very candidly with Joe the Plummer, the same thing came out, you know, his true colors comes out.
I'm I'm with you groups, your elite groups, and I'm a member of you guys, and everybody else can just fly it.
Let's let's go uh uh Mike Audio sound button number six.
Media montage.
I spoke of it earlier, how excited the media was over this.
It was an oval office address looking into the camera reading from the teleprompter.
Not using a teleprompter like we very often see this president.
No teleprompter, few notes.
Not using a teleprompter.
There was not a teleprompter.
There was no teleprompter.
Without a teleprompter, by the way.
Unscripted, no teleprompter.
He spoke without notes or a teleprompter.
Very few notes, no teleprompter.
It was extemporaneous, no teleprompter.
He did it without a teleprompter.
He did so in a 17-minute speech, and he did it without a teleprompter.
Wow.
Wow!
They are shocked.
Five and a half years into his presidency, Obama gave his first speech without a teleprompter, and they were so impressed.
And we all know why.
You see, he didn't need the prompter for this because he was going to be entirely totally open.
Every other speech is scripted so that Obama doesn't reveal who he really is.
That's the reason for the prompter is to keep the mask and camouflage on.
Back to the phones, Dallas, Texas.
David, glad you called.
Welcome to the program, sir.
It is an honor to speak with you, Rush.
I appreciate that.
Listening for many years back into the days of TV.
Uh issue that you were talking about earlier, and my great-great-grandmother, uh, back in 1843, when she was about 18, was captured by the Comanche Indians.
And her and another girl at that time.
The other girl eventually, of course, didn't survive, but uh obviously my great grandma great-great grandmother did.
Her name was Juana.
And uh she was later rescued and traded for two brothers uh who had moved to Texas from Connecticut area that had set up a trading post and uh traded for her.
So the point is that the Indians had slaves and they went to war over them.
That is correct.
And nobody would believe that.
You tell him nobody would believe that, uh, because of the the history revisionism that has taken place about how Native Americans were exploited by the evil uh white Europeans who came here, took everything they had, and then did unspeakable things.
Um I I know I I think of of all the races, Caucasians have the less, their least to feel guilty about.
Uh in in in in the context of truth, in the context of what's real in the world.
We are the only race that has gone to war to eliminate slavery to boot.
And so now some of these slave-holding Indians are running casinos.
Where's the justice?
That is the justice.
I know.
You know, if you stop and think of everything that's out of whack here, it's it's it's it it challenges um sanity.
I mean, for example, here's here's Obama, he bops out there Friday, he didn't even need his teleprompter.
And he starts talking about, yeah, 35 years ago, that could have been him.
And if he'd had a son, it uh would look like Trayvon.
But when you get down to it, Obama does nothing in common with Trayvon Martin other than the color of his skin, and that's it.
Thirty-five years ago, O'Berry was in uh was in Hawaii being raised by two rich white people.
And he went to one of the most exclusive prep schools out there.
Punah ho.
He did.
What are you laughing about?
What in the world is funny about that?
It's the absolute truth.
And wait, but he didn't.
You know, all of this coulda, would uh as if the the fact is that Barack Obama has more in common with George Zimmerman than he does with Trayvon Martin.
George Zimmerman is a mixed race man.
His mother is a black Hispanic and his father's white.
How come Obama doesn't identify with Zimmerman?
Obama is a mixed race man.
His mother was white.
His mother was a racist.
The grandmother, the grand typical white woman, the grandmother, her mother, his his is his white mother's mother.
The grandmother was a typical white woman.
Yeah, racist.
And his father, uh Barack Obama what I forget senior.
He's junior or the third.
Anyway, his father was uh African American.
His mother was white.
There's more in common there with Zimmerman.
What?
Is he less in common with with Trayvon Martin?
Snerdley says, You like being the Friend fan, huh?
No, I don't like being a frying pan, but I'm not afraid of being in a frying pan, but I'll tell you, what I'm really not afraid of is truth.
I am not afraid of it.
And I don't have any guilt.
So I know, I don't, I don't uh I don't fit the current mold.
But I just I I think if we're gonna get real here, uh Zimmerman's mixed race and Obama's mixed race.
Uh Obama nothing like the life Trayvon Martin had.
Well, uh, but you you think do you think uh uh well now wait, I I take it back.
I take it back because Trayvon smoked dope, right?
So'd Obama.
He was he was chum gang.
So there is some commonality there.
I just conveniently, inconveniently forgot that.
But in terms of what Obama's talking about, Obama's clearly talking about race.
He's far more in common with Zimmerman than he had with Trayvon uh Trayvon Martin.
Um let's go back to audio sound bites here.
This is Travis Smiley, Tavis Smiley was on Meet the Depressed on Sunday during the round table, and having a discussion about Obama's remarks about the Trayvon Martin case, and David Gregory said, Tavis Smiley, you were critical of the president.
You said on Twitter his comments were as weak as pre-sweetened Kool-Aid.
He took too long to show up and express outrage.
This town has been spinning a story that's not altogether true.
He did not walk to the podium for an impromptu address to the nation.
He was pushed to that podium.
A week of protest outside the White House, pressure building on him inside the White House, pushed him to that podium.
The bottom line is this is not Libya, this is America.
On this issue, you cannot lead from behind.
What's lacking in this moment is moral leadership.
The country is begging for it, they're craving it.
Now, I don't know why maybe Tavis here is critiquing the media.
Uh, and he may have a point there.
I mean, they they they went into immediate spin mode after that speech and started talking about, well, this is the greatest speech Obama's ever given.
Why it was so good he even went out there and he gave it without the teleprompter.
Oh, man, oh man, this guy is as good as we've always thought.
And Tavis would say, wait a minute, there were nothing genuine about this.
This town's spinning a story about Obama's speech that it doesn't deserve.
Now here is David Brooks.
David Brooks of the New York Times was also on a round table to meet the depressed.
David Brooks once had dinner with Obama.
Uh first time.
I've probably been many subsequent occasions, too.
But this is the man who thought because of the crease in Obama's slacks that he was destined to be president.
And we do not make that up.
David Brooks actually wrote that.
As well as said it.
The crease in his slacks.
So impressed David Brooks.
What do you have to be looking at to see that, by the way?
When is the last time?
Don, when's the last time you noticed the crease in a guy's slacks?
Brian, how about you?
Snerdley.
Me either.
Uh the crease in somebody's slacks, I the last time I cared about the crease and anything was Major League Baseball uniforms when I was a kid and wanted my little league uniform to look just like theirs.
But Brooks couldn't help but notice it.
So on Meet the Press, David Gregory said, David Mariness, who wrote a biography of Obama, writes this morning that once the president had reached the White House, it appeared that his intense interest in the subject of race had diminished.
He would be judged by the content of his presidency, not the color of his skin.
Race seemingly became an important, if not irrelevant to the first black president of the Union.
This is you know, this I think is an interesting point.
This is David Gregory quoting David Moranus, or uh uh in a piece that ran Sunday.
And I think this is how Obama had everybody fooled.
Remember, Obama was portrayed as this post-racial president, post-partisan president.
Everything was gonna vanish.
There wasn't going to be any more racism.
Weren't it gonna be any more partisanship?
There wasn't gonna be any more bickering, there's gonna be total unity.
And I think these guys all swallowed that Kool-Aid.
That pre-sweetened Kool-Aid.
They all swallowed it.
They all drank it.
They all had this image of what Obama was, and they made him fit into it, whatever the truth was.
And they really believed that Obama didn't care about race once he became president when anybody paying attention would know that's the primary thing that animated him.
It's the primary thing that informed him, primary source of his grievance.
Obama is grievance politics.
And the primary reason for that grievance is race.
It's in everything that he's done.
It's in every policy.
It's almost in every speech.
That and unions.
Victimization, minorities, and how they've been screwed by the majority for time immemorial.
all there.
Now these guys, Obama, when he became president, why, he just forgot all about that.
They wanted Brooks'opinion on that.
It's important to remember race is his first subject, as it would be if you had a black father and a white mother.
And all the mental habits he brings to all the other issues grow out of the way he framed race and the way he started thinking about race.
I thought this speech was one of the highlights of the presidency.
I thought it was a symphony of indignation, professionalism, executive responsibility, personal feeling.
It had all these different things woven together.
I thought beautifully.
But it's important to remember race is how he thinks.
Man, oh, man, I just marvel at it.
There are people inside Washington when Brooks said that, oh, man, I wish I had the ability to write that way.
Oh, I wish I had the ability to speak that way.
Oh, wow, was that not good.
Never mind that it's full of it.
I thought the speech was one of the highlights of the presidency.
35 years ago, that could have been Trayvon Mark.
If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon Mark.
Oh, that speech is one of the highlights of the presidency.
I thought it was a symphony of indignation, professionalism, executive responsibility, personal, a symphony.
*phone rings*
Quick timeout, folks, as we...
Oh, look at that.
Dennis Farina, the actor, has died.
He's dead.
He was uh 69.
He was a Chicago cop who somehow was discovered and played really funny parts.
One of the funniest roles was in a uh John Travolta movie, Get Shorty.
He played uh played the mobster in in Florida that uh Travolta was trying to run away from.
It was hilarious.
And practically all he ever uttered was the F-word.
But uh, oh, that's too bad.
Uh let's see, Royal Baby still on the way.
At least as reported by CNN.
Here's Rob in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Great to have you on the program.
Hello.
Hey, Ross.
Uh, I very upset.
Uh Well, I'm upset about a lot of things that Obama said on Friday, but in particular, it really upsets me when he said uh that um had the races of the two participants been reversed.
That is, that Martin been white and uh Zimmerman been black, that um the outcome at every step along the way might have been different.
And I I'm an attorney and I practice criminal law for several years, and it is really upsetting.
I I don't see anything like that in our criminal justice system, especially on a case like this where the evidence that the prosecution had was so sketchy.
I mean, I cannot imagine a jury convicting this guy.
The only thing that really might have been different is uh the Zimmerman never would have been charged had he had he been black.
Uh, but had he been charged and had he gone to trial with this kind of evidence, there's no doubt that the jury wouldn't would not have uh convicted him.
Okay, so uh I just want to make sure I understand what it is that that you're upset about.
Obama said that if the circumstances are reversed, that means he's saying he's saying that that our judicial system is inherently racist.
And and uh, you know, for the president of the United States to come out and say that uh is is I mean it's inflammatory.
It is, but why okay, let's stick with that then.
Why I I know it it it it's frustrating and makes you angry, but does it surprise you?
Oh it shouldn't.
Is my point it shouldn't.
Obama is all about creating chaos and upsetting the order of things.
He's all about stirring the pot and and generally uh involving things that have to do with race.
This is, I think, what Obama said is classic.
It was entirely un unsurprising, and furthermore, expected that he would go out and say something like this.
He's gotta keep his constituency happy.
He's got to keep his base happy.
He's got civil rights coalition breathing down his back because he hasn't acted mad enough about this.
So he goes out there and he he reads the script.
He says something that just like Jesse Jackson would say, or something just like Al Sharpton would say.
Uh, and who cares whether it is it is corrupting the judicial system.
Obama thinks it already is.
I'm not disagreeing with you.
I'm uh in any just don't don't misinterpret the tone of my voice.
Um, but you your point is that that uh are are you saying that that in your in your experience blacks do get a fair shake in the justice system?
Yes, absolutely.
I mean, uh, you know, there's always individuals are always gonna have their own prejudice prejudices.
But uh in general, generally speaking, uh when you have evidence, uh especially when you have evidence that's so one-sided, I I just cannot imagine a circumstance under which race would have mattered, the race of Zimmerman would have mattered case.
That's a great Rob, that's another great point.
Here we had another circumstance where the nature of the evidence was irrelevant.
The nature of the evidence is not what mattered.
The charge was what mattered.
And in the world of liberals, the charge is reality.
The evidence is not reality.
The evidence, if it doesn't go your way, is what's supposed to be doctored, manipulated, lied about, shaped or formed, so it means something other than what it really means.
The charge is what counts.
The charge is the truth.
It's like the presidential race in 2004, Rob.
The exit polls, the early, the first two waves of exit polls had John Kerry way, way ahead, winning the presidency.
Then the real votes started being counted after the first two waves of exit polls, and it turned out the exit polls were wrong.
Liberals immediately said the exit polls are what right and challenged the real vote on the basis that that's where the fraud had to be.
The real votes.
The real votes didn't count.
The fake exit polling is what was real.
Same thing here.
The nature of the charge.
And the charge, racism.
And that's what they were upset about.
Pure and simple.
They didn't get their way.
We'll be back.
Folks, don't go away.
Sit tight, my friends.
We got much more straight ahead.
Detroit and George Zimmerman is a hero.
▲
Export Selection