All Episodes
Previous Next
March 11, 2013 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:54
March 11, 2013, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, indeed.
America's anchorman is away, and this is your undocumented anchor man, Mark Stein, living in the shadows and loving it.
My pathway to citizenship got sequestered, but I don't care.
I'm still here doing the jobs that Americans won't do.
Actually, this is one job that Americans will do, guest hosting for Rush, because this is America's number one radio show, and there's lots of guys who would love to do this show.
And it's always an honor for me to be here.
Rush returns live tomorrow to take you through the end of the week.
So you need not be discompobulated by sinister foreign guest hosts.
I know, I know, it's never the same when the guest hosts are on, but don't forget, Pope Benedict will be being put into the guest host rotation, I believe, starting the Monday after Easter.
So you might want to put that in your diaries.
Breaking news.
Breaking news from the Larry Craig bathroom sting case.
Do you remember this?
This is like six years now.
This must be the most expensive, longest-running bathroom sex sting in the history of bathroom sex stings.
Six years ago, 2007, he was Senator Larry Craig, Republican senator.
So I'm being bipartisan here.
I love all the media matters thing, Oustein partisan hack and all the rest of it.
No, when our guys slip up, we hold them to the fire.
The Democrats would just make this guy nominate him for president.
But in the Republican Party, caused him a few more problems.
He was in the bathroom and he stuck his foot.
As I understand his explanation, he had a wide stance and he stuck his foot under the divider.
And the fellow on the other side happened to be an undercover cop from Minneapolis Airport.
I've actually been in this Minneapolis airport men's room.
And I have to say, you know, that if I think, I think they should probably just mandate minimum federal width for bathroom stalls, and they would probably have avoided all this.
But anyway, this bathroom cop, undercover Minneapolis bathroom cop, went full George Michael on him, and it didn't go well for Senator Larry Craig.
Now, the thing is, I've loved this guy's legal defense.
I'm not really interested in his wide stance or his playing footse under the divider with the cop, but I've always loved the legal ingenuity of Larry Craig's representation.
Because around the time he was having his trouble with the bathroom cop, I was on trial in Canada, had my difficulties with the Human Rights Commission up there over free speech.
And they said that I didn't have the right to write what I'd written.
Essentially, an excerpt from my book in the country's biggest selling magazine was put on trial.
And around about the time I was trying to fend off this legal suit, I read in an American newspaper that Senator Craig's lawyer had filed a brief arguing that the hand gestures that Senator Craig made under the bathroom stool divider were constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.
Well, you know, what a great country.
What a great country.
Who doesn't love America?
In Canada, according to the human rights guys up there, freedom of speech doesn't extend to my books and newspaper columns.
But in America, Senator Craig's men's room semaphore is protected by the First Amendment.
And I thought this was terrific.
And I made a resolution that from that day forth, instead of writing about radical Islam, I was only going to hit on imams in bathrooms.
It was a lot safer.
And this legal genius, now you've got to hand it to Larry Craig, getting a guy who'll advance that argument.
Now it's all come crashing down because the Associated Press has just reported breaking news that a federal judge.
There's now another case.
First, there was the case in which he pleaded guilty to playing FTSE under the bathroom divide and copped a fine for it.
Then Senator Craig attempted to fight back by arguing that it was constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment.
Then the Federal Election Commission sued Larry Craig for using his campaign funds to pay for the hotshot lawyer who advanced that ingenious argument.
So Larry Craig is now in federal court in Washington arguing that the $217,000 in campaign funds that he used to pay the lawyer who represented him in the bathroom sex thing fall under his official duties as senator.
Therefore, he's allowed to use campaign funds to pay for the lawyer in his bathroom sex case because as senator, he was traveling between Idaho and Washington for work.
And therefore, the bathroom at the Minneapolis, the Minneapolis airport men's room, is a legitimate public expense that falls under his senatorial duties.
So he said, if you gave money to the Larry Craig campaign, he used $217,000 of it to pay for the legal representation he had in this bathroom sex case.
And the judge, the U.S. District Court judge, is concerned, A.B. Burbert Jackson is concerned that that is too broad a reading of official travel.
Okay, like these guys, congressmen and senators pay for nothing.
Do you remember the incident with Barney Frank?
He was on the ferry from, I think it was Fire Island in New York with his significant other, and the ferry ride is $2 or whatever it is, three bucks.
And he goes, don't you know who I am?
He didn't want to pay for it.
He didn't want to.
Barney Frank didn't see any reason why he is a congressman.
Do you know what it's like getting these guys, once they've gotten used to that, to write a personal check?
So clearly, in this instance, Larry Craig thinks that paying for the lawyer to represent him in his bathroom sex case is part of his official duties.
And the judge is concerned that this could be too broad a reading of official travel.
Because, you know, after all, if everything he does between flying between Washington and Idaho counts as official business, you know, suppose anyone and then any other senator could decide to, you know, you've got a change at Minneapolis Airport and the plane's put back a couple of hours.
So you go to one of the hotels and you order up a prostitute and you put the hotel room and the prostitute.
You say that's part of your official duties.
Because Larry Craig's argument is that the Minneapolis men's room expenses incurred in use of the Minneapolis men's room fall under his official duties as senator.
He's not trying hard enough.
He could easily have said he was just checking whether the toilet tank was compliant with the Bill Clinton Al Gore maximum size toilet tank regulation.
If he'd done that, he wouldn't have had these problems.
But instead, he's basically saying that anything he does in a Minneapolis airport's men's room is part of his official duties as senators.
You know, there's a mentality here, and it isn't just, it's nothing to do with Republican or Democrat.
Once you get a permanent political class, and once you get people into the habit of not thinking like citizen legislators, then it becomes entirely normal to carry on like this.
And when you have these senators with their Gulf emir-sized retinues, why would Larry Craig think after enjoying that lifestyle that he somehow should be expected to dip into his own pocket to pay for his legal representation?
We accept too much of that.
I said the last time I was here that Obama's Christmas vacation costs more than the entire cost of flying everybody in the royal family around their various realms.
That's to say, not just around the United Kingdom, but to Canada and Australia and flying Prince Harry to Afghanistan and all the rest of it.
One Obama vacation costs more than the entire cost of the royal family.
And that percolates down the chain.
You look at the way, you look at everything.
The salaries are irrelevant.
It's like so much of American life now.
It's all in the benefits.
Senators and congressmen have nominally small salaries.
But when you actually look at what they're required to dip into their pocket and pay for, it's very little.
It's less and less, less and less.
You see it.
You slip into that lifestyle very easily to the point where when you get collared by an undercover cop in the next stall at the Minneapolis Airport Bathroom men's room, you hire the top legal representation and you think that's some kind of legitimate public expense arising from your duties as senators, as a senator.
And that mentality, that mentality is very revealing.
You know, when you have these guys with large retinues and large staffs and the whole thing, you know, there's just so much of everything now.
The legislators themselves, it's not just that there's 14,000 TSA officials at Newark Airport, at one lousy, unsafe airport.
Newark Airport, New Jersey, there's 14,000 TSA officials just for that one airport.
And they do a lousy job, but there's 14,000 of them there.
It's apparently the least safe airport in the country.
Would it be safer if they made it 17,000, 37,000?
It's very difficult for our legislators to actually get a grip on any of that when they're used to leading this regal lifestyle themselves.
And that's what the significance of the Larry Craig case is.
Look at this guy.
He's on the ropes.
So he's pushed it slightly marginally too far than you would expect to go because he's basically saying now $217,000.
By the way, $217,000, that's one hell of an expensive legal tab for a bathroom sex case.
But $217,000, he takes the money the public give him to elect one of their own to go and represent them in Washington, D.C., and he gives it to his lawyer in his bathroom sex case.
You can't have big government when you've got big, bloated legislators with big, bloated retinues.
In other words, these guys have got to start thinking.
If you wonder why they don't see it, why they don't think about it like this, it's because they're living this imperial lifestyle too.
Mark Stein in for Rush on the EIB network.
Going to take lots more of your calls.
1-800-282-2882.
Hey, Mark Stein, in for Rush on the EOEIB network.
Let's go to Everett.
I said we were only going to take calls in honor of the incoming Canadian Pope.
We're only going to take calls from border states.
So we're going to Spartanburg, South Carolina.
And Everett, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh show.
Great to have you with us.
How are you doing, Mark?
I'm doing good.
How are you?
I'm a longtime listener.
I've been listening for over 20 years.
Well, what I'm calling today is about your sequester.
I had a piece in the Washington Post last Thursday, and they were talking about how the District of Columbia had put, depended entirely on government jobs, and how this sequester is going to hurt them because a lot of these government jobs are going to leave the District of Columbia.
So that's why they're screaming now.
Their unemployment rate has been around 4.5%.
I live in a county that the unemployment rate's been around 11%.
Yeah, and you're right about that, that D.C. is basically now the boomtown in an era of growing government.
Last year, they found that seven of the 10 wealthiest counties in America are basically in the Washington suburbs because that's where the big paying jobs are in government.
I have one other issue I'd like to bring up is I'm really disappointed in the Congress and their inability to get answers on Fast and Furious, Benghazi, the launching of the anti-ballistic missile off the coast of California.
And now they're talking about the Justice Department has stopped an investigation of NASA officials shipping top secret documents to China.
And what's going on with that?
Yeah, all these things are important, Everett.
And actually, today, it's six months ago that Benghazi happened, September 11th, 2012.
And the president and the behavior of the government officials is still something that very few people know about, has not been covered.
And it's absolutely disgraceful.
The more we know about this, the more there is a total absence of responsibility and accountability at the top of this.
All these guys, by the way, one of the most disgusting and nauseating aspects of the whole Benghazi thing, since you mentioned it, Everett, is that when the bodies were returned to the United States of the four dead Americans, the president and the vice president and the secretary of state were all there, and they all did this Chris this, Chris that, Chris, this is Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
That's what he's known as.
If I met him, I'd say Mr. Ambassador or Mr. Stevens or Ambassador.
But Obama and Biden and Hillary Clinton, it was all Chris this, Chris that, Chris this, like he's their best friend in the world.
Like they knew he couldn't get their attention.
Hillary Clinton testified when she was testifying in Congress, said she gets all these cables and emails.
Can't be expected to look at them all.
She didn't see his cable.
He's Chris this, Chris that when she's standing next to his coffin, but when he's trying to email her to tell her the security situation's all gone to hell, he can't get her attention.
She doesn't open her emails.
And that's the same thing with Obama.
He made one call.
I think it was at 5.30.
And then he went off to prepare for his big Vegas, glittering Vegas campaign event, and he never called again.
He never called again.
He wasn't even interested.
There's an American consulate or whatever this thing is.
We don't quite know what this facility still is.
And it's being ransacked live in real time.
They've got drones watching it.
They can watch it in real time, which very few countries around the planet, if they'd seized the Australian consulate or whatever, Australia wouldn't have drones over there that could watch it in real time.
They can watch it in real time.
And it's not just that he doesn't send anybody.
Not even interested.
For the first time in decades, a U.S. ambassador is killed, and Obama doesn't even think it's a big deal.
He's off, you know, okay, great.
So there's something going on in Benghazi.
Excuse me, I've got to go off to Vegas and prepare now.
And nobody cares.
Nobody cares.
You know, you look at Abu Ghraib, for example.
That was on the front page of the New York Times day after day after day after day after day for months on end.
And nobody bought any of the stories about how it's the responsibility of this or that low-ranking nobody out there running the prison.
No, it's all Rumsfeld is responsible.
Bush is responsible.
This time, apparently, no cabinet official, nobody, nobody you've heard of is responsible for this.
It's just one of those things.
Could happen to anybody.
Could happen to anybody.
It's six months ago today.
Six months ago today.
Nobody cares.
Everett mentioned a couple of these other things.
Fast and Furious.
Fast and Furious.
There's a big pile.
Let's put aside the American agents killed by these guns.
There's a huge, big pile of dead Mexicans killed by these guns.
Do you think George W. Bush could get away with killing persons of color in foreign countries with American guns?
This isn't like Reagan Iran-Contra sending a cake to the Ayatollahs or whatever that was all about.
This is actually a mountain of dead Mexican corpses.
And that's exactly the sort of thing the so-called American liberal media, liberal progressive media are supposed to care about.
Suddenly these corpses, if you happen to, these corpses don't matter because they're killed by Obama.
They're killed by Eric Holder.
They're killed by drones in Yemen or Somalia.
You look at these drone attacks, by the way.
Just to bring up one final thing.
These drone attacks.
It's not just that there's more drone attacks in the Afghan theater.
The drone attacks have been massively expanded to Yemen and Somalia, two countries that the last time anybody checked, the United States wasn't at war with.
In the legal sense, there's nothing different about Obama sending drones out to clobber people in Yemen than there is about him sending drones to whack some guy in Belgium or in Sweden.
But apparently, you know, that's something that's just under the radar.
Where are the principled left on this?
Where are the principled left?
You know, this Ambassador Chris Stevens wasn't one of our guys.
He was one of your guys.
He believed the whole Arab Spring narrative.
He was fully on board of that.
He was your guy.
He was a progressive, liberal guy who died because of this administration's stupidity.
Is he just one of the, you know, you can't, whatever it was, Lenin's line or Stalin's line?
You can't make an omelette without breaking a few eggs.
And Chris Stevens is just one of those eggs.
And these dead Mexicans killed by Fast and Furious are just one of these eggs.
Where are the principled left?
Where's the principled left?
These are your guys.
These are your people.
These are people you profess to care about.
When are you going to do something about this?
Yes, Rush returns live tomorrow for full strength.
All American excellence in broadcasting through the end of the week.
And for the moment, we're down to the final half hour of wishy-washy, cheap, minimum-waged, outsourced, offshored foreign labor.
Don't worry, Rush will be here live tomorrow.
One final thing on this business with poor old seven-year-old Josh getting suspended for nibbling his Pop-Tart into the shape of a gun.
Julia Emails to say that the real crime here is actually sending a kid to school with a Pop-Tart, which is not on the list of Michelle Obama government-approved snacks.
So we need to back up here.
It may not be that this kid has been suspended and they're now passing this law in the Maryland legislature to forbid teachers from suspending kids for nibbling food items into the shape of guns.
It may just be, it may not be the gun shape.
It may actually be the Pop-Tart that is to blame.
I mean, for example, if he was, you remember when the president was campaigning in 2008 and he was in Iowa and he said, have you seen the price of arugula these days?
Had the kid taken a piece of arugula to school and nibbled it into the shape of an AK-47, would he have been suspended?
That is the interesting question.
If you take a Michelle Obama-approved meal, if you take some, say, Rutabaker slices, can you nibble, say, the Rutabaker slices into various shapes and put them together to form an ammo belt?
Would that be permitted?
We don't know.
It might just, in fact, be the Pop-Tart that is the real crime here.
It's like in Mayor Bloomberg's New York, where he's banned the maximum-size sugary drinks.
It might just be a nutritional issue here.
Let's go to Janet in Mansfield, Ohio.
Janet, you're live on the Rush Limbaugh Show.
It's great to have you with us.
Hello, Mark.
I'm happy to speak with you.
Thank you for taking my call.
My pleasure.
Great to have you with us.
I want to make my word known that I, along with many other Americans, take umbrage in the fact that Obama, President Obama, uses our government money recklessly for his own use.
He takes his wife to dinner for a date.
He bought two big buses.
Every time he goes anywhere, he has to take two airplanes.
He does not care about our government at all, or the sequester never would have come to this point.
And also, I take the fact that his lack of interest in the government and Benghazi as an assault and an affront to us who are paying his wages and trying to keep our government and America as it was intended to be.
Well, what's objectionable here, Janet?
Because just as a simple monetary item, the presidency costs more than every single European royal family puts together.
People don't believe it when I say that, but I said about half an hour ago the cost of flying the royal family around the world in, I believe the most recent year was 2011, $7 million.
The cost of flying the Obamas around the world in one year, last year it was $346 million transporting the, because in a sense, nothing he does is real.
You know, he takes a 40-car motorcade when he pretends to visit a hamburger stand or a bookstore in suburban Washington.
And what's he doing there?
I mean, that's what I find odd, Janet.
He's like saying, oh, oh, look, I'm just pretending to be a regular, even though I'm president, I'm pretending to be a regular person eating a hamburger and going to a pet store to buy dog food for my photo opportunity dog.
But the fact that you take a 40-car motorcade to visit a hamburger stand wipes that out.
It totally nullifies the whole point of it.
If you've got an imperial president, if you've got the mighty why not just pretend, why not just drop the pretense?
But there's something so condescending that it ought to make any true repub anyone with a truly Republican sensibility vomit to see a 40-car motorcade pulling up at a hamburger stand.
It's really another thing too, he took a $4 million vacation to Hawaii, and we have people in Staten Island and Upper New Jersey who still have not received the government funds promised to them to even have a place to sleep, let alone live.
Yep, and again, you're right.
That's atrocious.
You're right there.
He flew in.
He flew in, Janet, and he was there in the days after the storm.
And he was photographed putting his arm around all these people whose homes were devastated and saying that I've directed my officials to cut the red tape, to make things happen, to get things done.
The FEMA guys moved in.
Three, four months later, whatever it is, there are still people in Staten Island.
I mean, this isn't like some remote little upcountry village hundreds of miles from the nearest city.
Staten Island, New York, there are still people living there in homes without light, without heat, without electricity, who've been cloddered by all these other winter storms that have come along in the four months since that I mean you look at the way they hammered Bush on New Orleans.
Everything that happened in New Orleans was Bush's fault.
Obama flew in two days later, looked cool in a bomber jacket on Air Force One in his monogram bonner jacket saying Commander-in-Chief on, and then flew away and nothing, and that's it.
He's made a photo op.
He doesn't have to pay.
And by the way, just to fact-check your $4 million on that Obama Christmas vacation, that's actually an underestimate.
I believe the most recent estimate of that is that that vacation cost over $7 million, Janet.
So it's $7 million.
It's a resolution, and that's to impeach him for a lot of things.
He has not yet proven that he is a U.S. citizen, especially when his passport's showing that he was taking trips back and forth to Africa when he was getting student aid from the United States and he wasn't living here.
This wasn't his residence.
Oh, right, right, right.
All the business about Columbia.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Here's the thing.
Here's the thing, though, Janet.
You know, nobody's going to impeach him.
Nobody's going to impeach him because the Republicans don't want that hung around the neck.
But what they should do, what everybody should do is say, look, either, if people are hurting, if people are hurting, if it's necessary, when you've got a nation with 50 million people supposedly on food stamps, the president has to forego the occasional golf game with Tiger Woods.
Look, he's provided with the White House.
That's pretty nice.
Used to be actually a pretty simple affair, but like everything else, it kind of growed like Topsy.
And it was a simple affair, by the way, until pretty much the Eisenhower era.
This is not something with deep roots in American life.
He's got the White House.
He's got Camp David.
So he's got a town place and a country place.
He's got twice as many homes as the average American has.
And that's not enough.
And he has to be told, well, why don't you spend Christmas at home?
What is this business of Christmas in Hawaii every year.
Most, why doesn't he spend Christmas in the White House or Christmas at Camp David or Christmas back at his house in Chicago?
And the 40-car motorcade doesn't impress anybody when you're broke.
When you've got a federal debt of $16 trillion, having a 40-car motorcade to pretend to visit a burger joint or a dog food store doesn't impress anybody.
And that's not a left-right thing.
It shouldn't, if a Republican were carrying on like that, the left would be right to be up in arms about it.
You know, you either have a citizen president or the whole revolution thing is a waste of time.
For some reason or other, I happen to be watching over the weekend a video of the Queen opening the Scottish Parliament last year, I believe it was.
It's basically the Scottish equivalent of the State of the Union.
The Queen arrives with a car in front and a car behind, right?
That's a three-car motorcade.
The 40-car motorcade doesn't make the president any safer.
It'd be just as safe with a 20-car motorcade.
With the more people you have involved, the more opportunity you have for security breaches.
As anybody who's, you know, I've seen things at presidential events in New Hampshire where if you happen to know the ins and outs of the buildings, you realize that exactly as with the TSA, the 40-car motorcade, like the 14,000 TSA officials at Newark, is basically all about security theater.
It's security theater.
But at some point, at some point, people have to say either he's right that people are hurting and there's 50 million on food stamps and we've all got to, you know, somehow we've all got to live prudently, and he's got to be part of that too.
It ought to revolt anyone.
Tiger Woods golf game, why don't you just halve the number of golf games?
Why don't you invite him over to your place?
Why don't you play at Camp David?
You've got twice as many homes as your subjects.
Why do you need to fly off here and fly off there?
Why do you need to shut down Manhattan because you want to pretend to take Michelle Obama, the first lady, to a Broadway show?
Why do you need to shut down Manhattan?
It's absolutely, as I said, the whole revolution's a waste of time.
Because this is, George III didn't carry on like this.
And no monarch can.
That's the advantage, by the way, of monarchy in a democratic age, that monarchs can't go around queening it.
Only presidents can go around queening it.
And this guy and this guy is, it's an affront to any kind of sense of Republican self-government.
Mark Stein for Rush, lots more still to come.
Mark Stein in for Rush on the EIB network.
The senators, the senators have crafted a bipartisan overhaul of U.S. immigration laws to agree a path to legal status, AIDS.
But other hurdles remain.
This is from the Los Angeles Times.
What is fascinating to me about this?
This is about legalizing the status of 11 million people or more, 20 million, who are here illegally, who are here illegally.
And that may or may not be a good idea.
But what's crazy here is the assumptions made by the way it's reported.
Still undecided is how long illegal immigrants would need to wait before they could apply for permanent residence status and eventually become citizens.
The delay for a green card probably would be 10 years or longer.
What is this about?
There are people who are here working, living here illegally, in many cases for many, many years, right?
What difference does it make whether your official government permit to live and work here is called a green card or a purple card or a pink polka-dotted card?
It doesn't make any difference.
The minute you've got the first bit of paper from the U.S. government saying you're here and nobody's going to deport you, all your worries are over.
The idea that somehow there is some kind of punishment, that you've got to, you know, you won't get your green card for 10 years, which means in theory, you won't get your U.S. citizenship for 15 years.
That doesn't care.
Who cares about that?
The minute you've got one little, nobody except some stupid bureaucrat would care about the distinctions between this particular documentation and that particular documentation.
Once your status is legalized, it doesn't matter whether it's green card legalized, whether it's chocolate cupcake legalized, whether it's pink unicorn legalized.
Once you've got the documentation saying you're not a criminal, nobody's going to deport you, you're here legally, all the rest is mumbo-jumbo.
The fact that the United States Senate, by the way, every other country in its immigration program understands that.
Why do you think people who come here illegally are like gagging for some path to citizenship?
They're coming here essentially for economic reasons, and there may or may not be advantages to U.S. citizenship.
Certainly, if you're remitting most of your money back to your pals, your family in Mexico every month, there's certainly a downside to taking U.S. citizenship.
This idea that the senators are arguing over the time at which they'll get a proper official green card, the time at which they'll get a proper official certificate, the time at which they'll get an official welcome letter from Joe Biden.
None of that makes any difference.
The fact that we're talking about it in these kind of terms is a sign that the debate is insane.
Once they've got the official legal status, all the rest is applesauce.
All the rest is details.
Another great story I don't want to let go by today.
This is from the Boston Globe.
Liz Kovalchek.
People have noticed that suddenly there's certain kind of fees, a certain type of fee seems to be creeping up in their medical bills.
You know, so you pay, these are all people in New Hampshire, by the way.
They're paying like this one person paid $250 for the surgeon, Tufts Medical Center.
The surgeon billed $250 for his service.
But the patient was also charged with a $500 facility fee for spending 20 minutes in the building, right?
So the doctor is $250, but you've got a $500 facility fee for using the waiting room.
And people have begun to notice this, that this is essentially – my experience, by the way, of American health care is that if you question any of this stuff, they'll roll it back.
If you question any item on the bill, they'll roll it back.
But that's the point.
Third-party systems, whether it's insurers or whether it's the government, are always more expensive.
When people have to pay for their own health care, as these people in this story with their high deductibles do, they start to notice these items.
$500 facility fee for sitting around in the waiting room for 20 minutes.
When you have to spend your money, you look at the bill.
When it's a third-party cost, whether it's the insurer or the government, it's just about whether the third party will give you access to the treatment.
So I say bring it on and question the items on the bill.
Mark Stein for Rush, more in a moment.
Mark Stein in Farush on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
What a day.
Day 10, day 10 of the sequestration nightmare devastating America.
I think it's up now to 19, 19 states reporting cholera outbreaks.
So we've discussed that, and we've dealt with all the exciting news regarding baked goods that one is not permitted to nibble into gun shapes in American schools.
I feel safer already.
I feel safer already knowing that.
And Kwame Kilpatrick, who will be, he's committed a sin almost as serious as nibbling a Pop-Tart into a gun shape, and he's going to jail for conspiracy and all the rest of it.
I've had a great time being with you, but the Border Patrol is knocking at the door.
Don't forget, Rush returns live tomorrow with all your breaking news from the Papal Conclave and more.
▲
Export Selection