All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 15, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:39
November 15, 2012, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
If there has been a theme to the 30 to 40, maybe even longer than that.
When I went to school, when I was in grade school, junior high and high school, there was none of this liberal indoctrination.
I graduated in 1969.
Now, granted, I'm a small high school, small town in uh in Missouri probably was a bunch of liberal indoctrination going on in the Northeast.
In my life, I never I never was inundated with this stuff.
But I think if there's been a theme, if there has been a theme to the corruption of public education, it has been anti-capitalism.
That has been the umbrella under which everything else has been taught.
For example, I mentioned these tech blogs.
By the way, welcome back, L. Rushbo, 800-282-2882.
I mentioned these tech blogs, these 25, 35, even sometimes 40-year-old guys.
And to them, uh global warming is gospel.
It's it it's almost religious gospel.
It's it's a fascinating thing to step back and just read what these guys believe, knowing that they're just they're dead wrong.
But there would be no way that I know of of engaging them.
Well, there has to be a way.
I just to illustrate, my name comes up in some of these blogs as uh a uh liar.
They cite me as uh as a denier of global warming, and they say that I'm lying about it to all of you, and the reason is because I support big business.
I am an arch capitalist, and I am defending big they really believe, folks, that these that that multinational corporations and that big oil, they really believe the planet's being destroyed.
They really believe that the temperatures rise.
So Obama at his press conference yesterday just lies through his teeth and says that global warming is taking place at even more rapid rate than anybody knew.
There hasn't been any warming, and this is science in 16 years.
But I am automatically discounted.
There's not even the slightest consideration that what I'm saying might be right.
I'm just automatically discounted, and mistakenly, because I'm in the back pocket of big business.
Pure and simple.
And so I am automatically disqualified.
And it's not politics per se.
I mean, it's got politics in it, but that's cultural.
And dealing with it's cultural.
For uh uh Romney, let's go back and look at Romney's campaign for a second.
Romney's campaign focused on the economy, and a lot of it focused on the entrepreneurial aspects of the economy.
And what did uh what did Romney say frequently?
We need to get rid of red tape and regulations, and we need to recreate the entrepreneurial spirit.
Most people, most of the people who did not vote for Romney haven't the slightest idea what a regulation is.
They're never impacted by it because they're not business owners, they're not small business owners, and they are not anything other than employees.
Don't frown at me.
Are you we it's not a question of stupid, it's a question of what they've been taught to question their life experience.
You know as well as I do, the percentage of entrepreneurs compared to standard employees is tiny.
Now, I'm I'm not criticizing the Romney campaign.
Don't misunderstand.
I'm just simply making an observation.
The idea that to these people, government does not put things in your way.
Government paves the way.
That's what they've been taught.
And we're out there trying to warn these people that government's blocking them and getting them.
They don't see it that way.
They don't see it that way because of their indoctrination the way they've been taught.
And when I say it's not political, of course it is political, but what I mean is eating them is is not that there's not a politician around that can do it using political tactics.
You either have to outnumber them and beat them as a strategy, or you have to convert them to your side.
It's it's the Republican Party's choice.
But if you want to convert them, you're gonna have to totally alter the cultural landscape of this country.
Look at this.
I I uh The more I think of this, the more almost every oddity can be explained by it.
This Jill Kelly, babe, this this uh this socialite in Tampa.
We've been laughing all week because she's out there saying she's an honorary consul.
Well, now, wait till you hear this.
Now you've got two separate stories.
Jill Kelly had lunch at the White House on September 28th.
And she told a Tampa Bay Times reporter on a September 28th email.
In addition to that, I was just recently appointed to be the honorary consulate general to South Korea.
I'm in D.C. today, just left from breakfast at the White House.
Really hope to see you soon.
That's an email to a reporter at the Tampa Bay Times.
So this Jill Kelly woman, she believes that she was appointed to be an honorary consulate to the general, the consulate general of South Korea.
And she had breakfast at the White House about it.
Then we turn to an AP story.
On Wednesday, a New York businessman said that Jill Kelly was introduced to him at the Republican National Convention in Tampa in August as somebody whose friendship with Petraeus would help facilitate a no bid deal with South Korea.
A coal gasification project.
She would supposedly be in a position to help broker the billion dollar deal directly with the Korean president.
She expected a 2% commission.
This according to Adam Victor, the president and CEO of Trans Gas Development System.
Kelly is, this is Tampa Flores AP yesterday.
Kelly is an honorary consul for South Korea.
A ceremonial position.
She got diplomatic plates for her car.
After flying Kelly to New York to discuss how she could help with this gas business in South Korea.
This guy, Adam Victor, says that he concluded she had little to offer in the way of deal making expertise.
Now, this is in August.
Don't forget the Republican convention.
She's being held out as a liaison to Petraeus, the honorary consul of South Korea who can help broker a coal gasification deal at the Republican convention in August.
In September, she is having breakfast at the White House.
Yes, I'm in D.C. today.
I just left from breakfast at the White House.
I was just appointed to be the honorary consulate general to South Korea.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, I mean this gets weirder and weirder and weirder, but this is this is this is one sordid tale here.
You talk about an intricately woven web of deceit.
This is the woman that the FBI agent took his shirt off.
By the way, we got truth coming out on that.
This guy apparently is a conservative, which is why he's being hit on.
He has taken down two ter uh uh he stopped two separate terror incidents on his own.
Uh and he apparently is very good friends, he and his wife with Jill Kelly and her husband.
So it was it was not, he was not infatuated, sending her the shirtless photo.
It was a inside joke.
Anyway, I this we're we're we're talking here about the director of the CIA, and this woman claims that she's close enough at the Republican convention.
She's held out, not she didn't hold herself out.
She's pointed out to a guy, get to know this babe.
She's the honorary consul general of South Korea.
She can help you with her coal plant.
She's got an inn with Petraeus.
Lo and behold, she's having breakfast in the White House, for who knows what the hell reason, on September the 28th.
Basically a month after the Republican convention.
I have no idea what's going on here, but but I that's the that's the point.
Who the heck does know what they're going to do?
Now I want to play these Ron Paul sound bites.
I was going to hold this off to the next hour, but I've started in this direction.
And no, I have not forgotten about Benghazi and the timeline here, we're going to get to all that.
Ron Paul's farewell speech to Congress yesterday.
And I found this, we got two sound bites, and I found this intriguing.
I've thought a lot about why those of us who believe in liberty as a solution have done so poorly in convincing others of its benefits.
If liberty is what we claim it is, the principle that protects all personal social and economic decisions necessary for maximum prosperity and the best chance for peace, it should be an easy sell.
Yet history has shown that the masses have been quite receptive to the promises of authoritarians, which are are rarely, if ever, fulfilled.
Has he not just nailed it there?
He has for me.
I know a lot of you think we're listening to Cookville here, but for me, this nails it.
We are the party of liberty.
We we are the essence of liberty and freedom.
That's what it's all about.
When I made my CPAC speech, theme was liberty.
We want this to be the greatest country ever.
We want you to be the best you can be.
We want everybody to be the best they can be.
We want to get all the obstacles out of people's way.
Freedom.
Why is that a hard sell?
Because it is.
If freedom did not win in this election, freedom did not win.
Why is it a hard sell?
Why are the people, those of us proclaiming freedom?
Why are we the ones mocked and laughed at or insulted, impugned?
Because that's all we stand for, and that's all we want for anybody and ourselves is liberty and freedom.
And yet, look at how we're really viewed.
We are seen as the deniers of freedom.
And why?
Well, we don't believe in abortion.
And to the left, the ultimate freedom is aborting your baby.
We're said to be on the wrong side of gay marriage.
To the left, that's especially to the young today, that gay marriage, gay rights is the legalized pot issue of the 60s.
It is the thing they care most about.
It is the civil rights issue of the 60s.
Gay rights and gay marriage among young college people and you know, up to age 30, maybe a little older.
We who do not support, we are not looked at as people who believe in freedom.
They see us as thwarting their freedom.
Figure that.
Now there's a reason why.
I know the I know the answer.
That is because on our side, there's along with freedom, there are natural limits to it that we call morality.
And that's what the other side doesn't want any part of.
You start talking about morality.
That's judgmentalism.
That's not freedom.
If you start implementing morality, say you're imposing your moral views on everybody, when all we think we're doing is continuing traditions and institutions which have been shown to maintain the freest, most productive, conducive, peaceful society, the world is known.
Morality is a key element.
Morality.
It's old fashioned.
It's none of your business.
And so those of us who really, I mean, when Romney goes around and talks about limiting regulations and free things of entrepreneurs, that's the essence of a liberty agenda.
It's the essence of an economic free agenda.
But culturally, freedom in pop culture means no obstacles on the road to what we call depravity and decadence.
They call it enlightenment emancipation.
I'm sorry, to fix this is going to be a cultural undertaking uh in addition to or instead of political.
Here's the next Ron Paul soundbite.
If authoritarianism leads to poverty and war and less freedom for all individuals, and is controlled by rich special interests, the people should be begging for liberty.
There certainly was a strong enough sentiment for more freedom at the time of our founding that motivated those who were willing to fight in the revolution against the powerful British government.
During my time in Congress, the appetite for liberty has been quite weak.
The understanding of its significance negligible.
That's just how they define it, Congressman.
Is it...
What he thinks is liberty and freedom is the absence of totalitarianism, authoritarianism.
It's not at all how pop culture leftists see freedom.
They see freedom as no conservatives around.
They see freedom as no corporations.
They see freedom as Julia.
You don't have to work, and you can still live.
You don't have to have, you don't have to accept any responsibility or accountability, and it'll be taken care of.
A doctor shouldn't profit for making somebody well.
That you want to talk about morality?
Why that to them that's immoral.
Because at the top of all this has been decade after decade after decade of the trashing of capitalism.
What do you think free markets means to the vast majority of people who voted for Obama?
You think it means anything?
Do you think the phrase free markets means anything to them?
Greed exploitation.
Uh taking advantage of free markets to them is evil corporations outsourcing jobs or paying people the minimum wage or what have is the opposite of fair markets.
Fair markets, of course, are when authoritarians make rules for everybody that they must follow.
Anyway, I gotta take a break, my friend.
Sit tight.
Coming back, El Rush Ball with much more of the EIB network.
Don't go away.
And we're back, and we head to the phones are gonna start in Cordelia, California.
This is Roy.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Good morning, Roy uh Rush.
It's uh uh an honor to talk with you today.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Um something's been bothering me about the reports out of Benghazi.
Um the disposition of Ty Woods uh illuminating the uh mortars uh with his laser designator.
Right?
Uh it's been reported it uh you, amongst other folks, have have said that uh he he probably lit that place up in hopes that some someone would see it.
Um, no.
No, no, no.
He wouldn't light it up unless he knew there was somebody up, unless he thought somebody, not I never said hope.
He had to think that somebody was going to act otherwise he's giving his location away.
Exactly.
My my contention is um I've been keeping it in touch with folks who are still active.
Those guys don't light those things up unless somebody they're in touch with some sort of asset that's there to help them.
I know.
This that's why this is really befuddling to me.
This is a Navy SEAL.
Yes.
He knows what he's doing.
He knows the story we've had is that he was told he and his buddies three times stand down, you don't show up.
They went over anyway.
And then they designated the target.
He designated a target with his laser.
That is worthless unless there's a bomb that's aimed at what he's lasering.
So I I thought from the beginning that he had to think that he had a C 130 or or a drone or something up there that was going to fire based on what he did.
Agreed.
And I I contend that he possibly was in contact with somebody.
We'd almost have to be.
I got you're look, that that I'm I probably haven't said that.
I've just assumed I'm making assume people would understand that he has to be a communication with somebody.
Uh he's not a you don't go light up targets with a laser designator on your own.
You just give yourself away.
There's no point in doing it.
Those those guys are t are too well trained, too well dedicated, and too intelligent uh to leave themselves open as a target unless you're Okay, so what you're saying, and we're in a dangerous territory here, because now we are really speculating, but I guess what you're thinking is is that there's a whole lot we don't know here that if uh that if if Ty Woods goes over there and does this, that somebody had to be involved in a coordinated response.
That that what that was underway that didn't happen.
Yes.
I I will leave open the the possibility of the desperation of the of the moment.
Umbe he ha he felt that he had no no other choice but just in blind hope that something was coming to help them that he lit that target.
But I I find believe look, they have to consider everything.
That could very well be possible that he just hope against hope.
Um that because people knew he left.
People knew that he and his buddies went over there.
Maybe somebody would have backed him up, well, because that's what happens.
Uh there's so much that's that's been um left open for interpretation because there hasn't been any explanation.
And now all these denials of everything that we thought we knew.
Uh and there's no question here, folks, that some of what we know is true that's being covered up now.
This was an utter disaster in every which way you look, and the people involved in that are obviously trying to cover up what made it a disaster.
Sticking with the telephones for a while.
Mike in Camden, Tennessee.
I'm glad you called, sir.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thanks.
I'm talking to Russell Limbaugh.
I got something to talk to my grandchildren about someday.
Wow.
Anyway, uh the point I wanted to bring up is this Benghazi thing, what it needs is a John Dean.
It and and I think Petraeus could be that person.
That you know Hope Springs Eternal and the audience of the EIB network.
See, uh he he could he could be that man.
He could go tomorrow and just tell the truth.
And and you know, since he's not employed by the government anymore, he's not beholden to the government anymore.
Well, we don't know that.
And he don't know that's a fair thing over ho hang over his head.
We don't know that any of that.
We we that I mean, this Jill Kelly babe is saying she's tight with Petraeus and can help a guy broker a coal gasification deal in South Korea.
I I'm going by I watch the Fox News shows and I I see the former generals and people like KT McFarland who say they know this man personally and how honorable he is.
Yeah, that's what they all say.
And I I I think he could he could he could do it.
But you know I'm just holding I'm holding out hope.
All right.
But but you know, that what scares me about this whole thing, Russia is I got an 18-year-old son in in high school.
He's a he's a chief master sergeant in the Civil Air Patrol, and he wants to go into the military, and I'm really concerned that you know he would have Barack Obama as his commander in chief.
And and John, if you're not smart enough, you go to Iraq Terry as his defense secretary.
I'm just Yeah.
I'm looking for something.
I don't think I printed it out, and I'm going to have to print it out since you called.
What's that?
Well, a um military guy has written a piece today that is being forwarded around by generals.
I happen to know retired one I happen to know one of the retired generals who's forwarding this thing.
Highly respected.
You see him on TV.
This piece rakes Petraeus and Kelly over the coals, saying the last thing they are is duty honor country.
Just based on what we know in this episode.
Well And I only mention this to you because you you you're it's about all these people that are on TV saying that they they know Petraeus and he's uh the king of integrity and so forth.
And I just I'm just gonna let you know that there's a piece out there today floating around just the opposite, and it's a military guy.
Who is worried, wrong wrong button, he's worried and uh that the military is deteriorating like every other institution in this country.
That that that all of the the things taught at West Point duty on our country, none of that matters anymore.
None of it everything's everything's plastic banana good time rock and roll today.
That you that that nothing is what it appears.
Uh that that our overall decadence is happening throughout.
Every institution and tradition in the country, particularly the powerful ones we count on.
That that's his whole point in this piece.
Well, I got my fingers crossed.
Tomorrow may tell the tale.
Well, by the way, John Dean ain't no great shakes.
Uh you want to get down to things.
I well, I mean, I said a more honorable John Dean.
Okay.
I mean, I don't think Petraeus.
Where do you see John Dean on TV?
MSNBC.
Well, yeah.
But I would I mean that's the only example I could come up with at the time, but but you know, I I think if Petraeus went in there and told the truth, uh afterwards he wouldn't be called a rat.
Uh like uh Mr. Dean was.
It it they look at do I need to remind you what they were doing to this guy before he had even testified on the surge.
General B. Treyus.
Hillary Clinton was talking and called him a liar.
You have to you have to suspend reality to believe this guy.
By the way, this piece.
Maybe he needs to keep stuff like that in mind when he goes and uh walks through that door tomorrow.
Uh yeah, yeah.
I uh no, I understand I understand what you're saying.
You you're saying we need a hero.
He's he's he's we we need a hero.
And and everybody's fear is that there aren't any.
He got caught with his pants down literally, and he did the honorable thing, and he resigned.
So, you know, maybe he he he can carry it on.
Well, but but he didn't want to resign.
He didn't want to leave.
Yeah, that's true.
He wanted to stay.
That's yeah, that's been the Washington Post, the Philadelphia Inquirer.
He wanted it swept under the rug.
He didn't want to leave.
He essentially was fired.
Anyway, I I I appreciate the call.
I'll find that piece between now and next week and print it out.
Now I'll find it here in just a second.
I can summarize it in in two or three sentences.
Um I'll summarize it in just a second.
I I don't I don't want to get I don't want to get I'm already losing ground here.
I've got sound bites eight through twenty-one on this Benghazi business that I thought I'd be over with by now.
I have the comparison that Broadwell's getting from two different women.
She's a slut to one woman and the other woman she's a victim.
Uh so I've got a lot of stuff yet here, and I want to plus I've got to squeeze these phone calls in here.
So I'll I'll find I'll I'll I'll uh after the break, during the break, I'll get it here and I'll I'll summarize this thing for you.
Five minutes, folks.
Maybe six.
In the meantime, Vic in Genoa, Illinois.
Hello and welcome to the program.
Oh, thanks, Russia.
It's great to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Yeah, we're all sitting out here licking our wounds over the election, but we gotta keep moving on anyway, right?
Exactly.
You know, I think it's either that or move to Australia with Hillary.
Uh I I think I've got uh uh uh at least some food for thought.
Yeah, I don't you know, I hesitate to talk in front of millions of people say I have an answer to anything, but but I certainly have some food for thought.
You're asking the question about why is it so hard for for us to really grasp the concept of freedom today and what all it means.
And I I think the answer is No, no, no, no.
That's it.
Well, I won't I'm Mr. Precise.
Uh the question is why is it such a hard sell?
Okay.
You uh and and th along with that is why is it so difficult to grasp among today's young people?
What the answer I think is responsibility.
Uh Today we live in a in a in a generation where we teach young people that responsibility isn't theirs.
It's somebody else's.
It surrounds them in everything that they do.
They go to school and they get told they're not going to do as well as their parents.
This country has no opportunity left in it.
You're going to have to rely on someone else.
So they they believe that.
So now they think, gosh, there's a lot of risk.
I might fail.
If I exercise my freedom to do the best that I can for me, yes, there's a risk I'll succeed.
Yes, there's a risk, I'll fail.
Well, failure, gosh, that's so scary today.
So responsibility is a is a thing that we're we're really uh kind of uh educating out of our kids.
I think there's a lot of truth in that, folks, because freedom inherently requires responsibility.
Yeah, that's why they're moving home.
That's you know, in droves.
That's why we're going to insure them until they're 26 years old.
I mean, you know, uh, it's why the teachers TV uh constantly telling them, you know, we're we're gonna get you the money you deserve.
We're we're gonna get you the money that you're entitled to because it's somebody else's fault.
It's always the teacher who's wrong, right?
Yes.
When I you and I went to school, a teacher was always right.
Today when you and I went to school, if we were kids, if we had a couple of bucks in our pocket, man, we were rich, and we made that last as long as we possibly could.
Today the kids have so much.
They have so much that they don't know what it's like to do without.
So they don't worry too much about getting out there and getting more.
If the government gives them a minimum life, hey, that's good enough for me.
If I don't have to work too hard for it and take a lot of responsibility.
Barack a clause, people are willing to vote themselves a lifestyle they're unwilling to earn.
Absolutely.
And and as far as this morality thing goes, I tell you, it just makes me sick because, you know, you talked about how uh, you know, we're getting away from morality.
Well, the very people that are teaching us that morality doesn't count, and it's not important anymore, the same people that are persecuting David Petraeus.
So, I mean, it's as crazy as it can be.
It is.
But part of the solution is correctly identifying what it is that you're fighting and trying to change.
And I really think we've been missing it.
Looking at it purely in political terms.
It's understandable.
Uh elections are fought on political battlegrounds, but this is this is gonna have to take place in in uh in other ways.
Look, Vic, I'm glad you called out there.
I gotta take a quick time out.
I'll find that piece and share the uh some stuff.
I'll summarize it for you, basically.
When we get back, don't go away.
Okay, the uh the piece here is uh written by G. Murphy Donovan, and it was forwarded to me by a retired general.
G. Murphy Donovan, Vietnam veteran, former intelligence offer officer, writes frequently about national security and military affairs and politics.
I don't know where the thing was published, but it was sent to me, and it's going around, folks.
The point is this is this is going around the retired military officer community.
And Snerdley, listen up.
You wanted the summary.
Here's the summary of this piece.
Petraeus is a fraud.
The military has also been corrupted by our overall cultural societal decline, and just as in the Democrat Party, failures are made heroes in the military.
Now, I threw in just as in the Democrat Party, because I'm the one that makes a statement.
He doesn't say it in this piece.
He doesn't say just as in the Democrat Party, but he does say pretty clearly that people rise to the top in the military and say, forget two.
We you have two kinds of of generals in the military now, in whatever branch.
You got the warriors and you got the politicians.
And the politicians are winning.
And what do politicians do?
They pander.
So let me give you a flavor for this thing.
General David Petraeus eliminates two grand military issues at just the right moment.
Officer core character and flag officer performance.
Petraeus could be the poster child for a clueless Gilbert and Sullivan character, too.
The very model of a modern major general.
Major general was the highest rank to Which an officer might aspire in the last century.
Grade inflation has created the contemporary glut of four stars, including Petraeus.
You don't need to hear anymore.
Grade inflation means there's a whole bunch of four-star generals who are nowhere near it.
A bunch of people who are getting C's, but they're being given A's.
In this guy's opinion, and I remember this thing is being passed around by retired military top line people.
Praeus doesn't deserve the four stars, and neither does Kelly, as you read this thing.
Now, folks, let me.
Again, I'm not saying this is gospel.
I don't know that it's gospel.
I'm just telling you how I got it.
But since the theme today is the overall decline of the institutions, duty, honor, country, all of these things, clearly, those things were set aside here.
In this episode, and this guy makes that point.
David Petraeus gloried in wearing every token of service on his chest, including presumably the good conduct ribbon.
Or maybe not.
The good conduct medal only goes to grunts, not officers.
Clearly, the good conduct award should hereafter be a badge of misplaced military expectations.
Nonetheless, the U.S. Army West Point officers like Petraeus continue to pay lip service to traditional military values and ethics like duty, honor, and country.
The second imperative, honor, seems to have been honored in breach by the former commander, this is Petraeus.
It's hard to believe as it was with Bill Clinton that Paula Broadwell was a one off.
So these guys are all running around saying, well, if it was Broadwell, there had to be others.
Or maybe the West Point honor oath is more relevant.
A cadet will not lie, cheat or steal, or tolerate those who do.
Ironically, cheating on your wife seems to be a moral misdemeanor in the army, while cheating on your trigonometry quiz could lead to dismissal.
Alas, Cadet David gets the hat trick here.
On the Larceny count, Petraeus stole reputation from both sides of his family.
His wife Holly is the daughter of a former West Point Commandant.
I mean, this guy is laying into Petraeus in this piece.
Now can you imagine our caller, John from Crofton listening to this?
He called yesterday, just raking me over the coals.
This is a 40-year hero.
Why in the world would you say he would go up and not tell the truth under oath?
Don't we more often than not wonder who will tell the truth under oath these days?
Particularly in American politics.
Isn't it a more unique occurrence when somebody tells the truth in politics?
And be not distracted by any honey trap nonsense.
Cheating on wives is a military tradition, not a scandal.
Officially, a remote tour is designated unaccompanied.
But overseas orders seldom require celibacy.
Alas, unaccompanied officers are known in the military as geographic bachelors.
A senior officer is not busted for cheating, but he will get drummed out of the corps for getting caught too visibly.
And morality only becomes an issue when it embarrasses the military.
In this respect, contemporary military culture is no different than American political culture.
If and when Holly Petraeus sings a few choruses of stand by your man, as did Hillary Clinton, the triumph of the bimbo ethics will be confirmed.
Men behave like swine because the women in their lives have either low or no expectations of them.
Petraeus not only gives new meaning to terms like embedded and all in, but he and Mrs. Broadwell give a whole new dimension to ring knockers.
That's a Military euphemism for arrogant military academy graduates.
Indeed, if the general was making booty calls with G.I. Jane and Kabul, the angst in the ranks should be unique.
Unlike Europe, Korea, Vietnam, ordinary soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan are discouraged, if not prohibited, from fraternizing with Muslim women like Saigon back in the day.
However, apparently the brass gets first run on the imported camp followers.
Rank still has its perks.
The imported camp followers, geographic bachelors.
And folks, there's three more pages of this stuff.
And again, just G. Murphy Donovan.
I've been told now it's posted at American Thinker, but I got it from a retired general who, and these guys are circulating this all over the place.
Do with it what you will.
I'm just telling you it's out there.
And it sort of fits with our overall discussion today on the decline of everything that we used to think we could count on.
Okay, coming up, the uh competing opinions of Paula Broadwell.
Uh, both from women, as well as uh we had a slew of sound bites here on this this whole Benghazi thing, and uh the long knives are out to drive bys.
They do not want a select committee, and they're mad at Lindsey Graham and McCain for ruining Obama's press conference yesterday.
▲
Export Selection