All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 15, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:45
October 15, 2012, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Are you kidding me?
Hillary Clinton has gone to Peru.
Is that is that not great?
I mean, just get out of Dodge.
They're dumping all over her.
They're throwing her under the bus.
They're throwing Bill under the bus.
And she decamps to Peru in the middle of all this.
My friends, you are tuned to the birthplace of the vast right-wing conspiracy.
And I am the Mr. Big of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
El Rushbaugh and a brand new week of broadcast excellence.
Happy to have you here.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program today, 800-282-2882, and email address El Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
So Obama's cramming for the next debate at a golf resort, but they didn't let him take his clubs.
They did not let it I mean that's torture.
They took Obama.
That's like that's like taking somebody to a whorehouse and moving all the women out.
They took him to a golf resort and didn't let him take his clubs.
Now he can still go rent some if he wants to.
Anyway, I'm stuck here, folks.
I'm getting confused.
Is Obama blaming Hillary for his la his debate performance?
Or is he?
No, he's blaming Hillary for foreign policy for Benghazi for lack of intel.
Who did he blame for his bad debate for?
Oh, that's a John Kerry.
Blame John Kerry.
Blames Bush for the economy, blames John Kerry for the bad debate, blames blaming Biden.
No, they're saying Biden won that debate.
If you read it, Obama's begging people, read the transcript.
You'll see that Biden won it.
Even Martha Raditz, the uh the second Democrat at the debate, uh with uh Biden and Paul right said, well, Biden was just too big.
He was just too big at the debate, meaning he was making too many noises, he was laughing too much, he was gesticulating too much, and you've got we got the audio sound bites coming up.
Everybody in the media, it's funny, is begging, urging, advising Obama, first thing out of your mouth on Tuesday night, 47%.
You gotta hammer the 47%.
You got you guys all you gotta say is just 47% because everybody in that room, Michael Barone has a great column about this today.
Michael by think it's the National Review Online.
I'm setting the table here.
This is what's all coming up on the uh on the program today.
I also think uh, ladies and gentlemen, I I actually I think we need to start saying I'm gonna start saying that I'm getting a little ticked off.
Eamon Al-Zawahiri Al-Qaeda, Al-Qaeda's spiking the football.
Well, they're picking off ambassadors, they're picking off embassies, whatever they want with impunity.
They're getting away with all kinds of mayhem.
I think Zawahiri's out there spiking the football.
You know, the the the fact Obama was um uh happy to hear the Republicans criticize him for spiking the football.
Uh who's really spiking the football is Al Qaeda.
You want to get down to Brass details on that.
F. Chuck Todd.
NBC says with a strong performance, Romney can effectively close out the election tomorrow night.
F. Chuck says he's looked at the polls.
Is this some structural problems with the polls for Obama?
F. Chuck's been on this ever since his own poll.
Ever since an NBC Washington or Wall Street Drittle poll came out about a month ago that had a Democrat plus 25 sample or whatever it was and had Obama up everywhere except Mars.
Uh F. Chuck, yeah, I got some real problems with these polls.
I'm just not sure I believe all this, and he's still talking about it, and he's a good indication.
There's real concern, there's real worry on the Democrat side that this is over.
And you gotta be very careful with these people because it wasn't long ago.
They're trying to depress everybody thinking it was over for Romney and trying to dispirit you.
It was just two weeks ago.
That all these polls said it's over.
Romney didn't have a prayer.
Now it's the other way around.
Now that it might be over for Obama.
And the psycho games continue.
We'll put it all into perspective for you today.
Uh Obama's got a new campaign ad out with Morgan Freeman and the ad, we got the audio coming up, the ad claims that few presidents have ever faced as many challenges as Obama has.
Oh, yeah, get the violins out, get the violins out, get the stratavarius out, get the tear jerkers going.
Oh, it's folks, and nobody nobody, nobody could have fixed it.
That's right, Limbaugh.
As I tell everybody, it's so bad, not even I could have fixed this.
And uh in the first black press, second black, whatever, hell yeah, he couldn't have fixed it either.
If I could, nobody could have.
But president, dead or alive, who could have fixed it.
And here comes Morton Free Morgan Friedman.
Few presidents have ever faced as many challenges as Obama has.
Now that would be news to George W. Bush, who saw the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a field in Pennsylvania wiped out.
And a recession.
9-11 and a recession would have been news to President Reagan, who inherited a worse recession than Obama did, and still had to fight the communists.
Still had to fight the Cold War.
Hell Obama.
He'd have to do that.
And you can take it from there.
How about Felix Baumgartner?
I watched this yesterday.
I was one of the eight million watching it on the internet.
By the way, that is its own topic.
Eight million people with no buffering and no problems whatsoever watched an event on YouTube via the internet.
That's the biggest red flag to broadcast television yet.
The previous YouTube record was 500,000.
One of the problems with the internet has always been buffering crowded over usage jerky playback.
Eight million people were looking at it on high definition yesterday, just as though it was on television.
I'll tell you, the broadcast networks were smart.
They're lucky they've got the NFL locked up for 10 years.
The NFL can't go YouTube for 10 years.
But I'm telling you, that is an amazing topic in and of itself, what it means for broadcasting.
I'm going to share with I've all of my life since the space program began, I have had a recurring, and it doesn't happen often, but I've had a recurring dreamslash nightmare.
And it's not not so much a nightwear, but it was that I was stranded on a satellite 17,000 or 25,000 miles high.
And the only way to get home was to jump.
I was alive.
None of it was possible.
But I was stranded on a satellite, and I'm looking, the only way home is to jump.
And I'm clinging to that one of the one of the uh arms, one of the one of the wings of the satellite, uh one of the solar arrays by my fingerhand fingertips by my hands.
I'm just hanging there.
The only there's no other way to get home but than to jump, and I do.
And after that, I don't know what happens.
I either wake up or forget it, or what have you.
But I'm alive to remember it, so I figure I got home.
So honestly, when I'm watching this yesterday, I've seen it.
I've had a mental picture of exactly the view that we saw yesterday.
I know this sounds like a made-up politician Clinton story.
This is exactly the kind of lie Bill Clinton would tell.
Or Hillary.
Yeah, I was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, which could not happen because he didn't climb out Everest till four years after she was born, but they tell lies like, I'm telling you, I've had this dream.
And I've heard people, I couldn't do it.
I couldn't step out of that little capsule and I could I think I could, uh, because I've done it all my life in my dream.
There are a bunch of things about this that for example, uh real quick question.
If Felix Baumgartner can jump out of a capsule 24 and a half miles high, Why can't people in New York buy 32 ounce sodas?
Really?
I would think weighing the dangers of jumping from a capsule 24 miles up.
That the calculation would be that that's much more risky than drinking a 32-ounce coke.
Or sprite or seven up a root beer, take your pick.
So if a guy understands the risks of a given behavior, he goes up 24 and a half, five years training on this.
Red Bull, you realize Red Bull paid for this.
The government didn't.
The beverage, Red Bull paid for it.
Otherwise, it would not have happened.
Not with Obama's budget priorities.
Unless somehow, if Baumgartner could have convinced Obama that there was Muslim outreach in this jump, he might have been able to get funding for it.
But I don't think he even tried.
I'm watching every minute of this.
In fact, I'm watching this instead of football.
I watched from the moment the balloon launched.
I watched the entire ascent to 127,000 feet, whatever it was.
Watched the jump, and I saw the long-range camera from one of the tracking trucks on the ground where he was out of control, spinning out of control.
And I saw the jump, and I had made a mistake.
I thought that he was going to dive head first off that capsule because of something I had read earlier, and it had graphics and diagrams of how this was going to take place.
It was a bunny hop off of that thing and jumped down, and he's just going straight down.
And this is what I'm going to have to ask some experts on their stand.
At some point during this jump, and 800 some odd miles an hour beats well past the speed of sound, breaks the sound barrier.
Nobody knew what would happen to human body doing that, not in a vehicle.
And at some point starts spinning out of control, and you can see it.
You can see he's spinning out of control.
And to today I saw the video from the head the helmet cam where he is spinning out of control, and it said he almost lost consciousness and was very disoriented.
He was sticking one arm out trying to slow the spin and the next arm out create drag trying to slow the spin.
This is why you do the training.
I don't know what causes the spin in the first place.
And there's another thing, too, that I've uh gotta ask, maybe some experts in the audience have the answer to this.
I have heard that when people jump from great heights, say to commit suicide or do it intending to harm themselves, that most of the time, and I can't tell you, I just I've read this so many places over the years that I can't give you a sight right now, that people die of cardiac arrest on the way down.
Shock, fright, just die of cardiac arrest, and therefore they're not aware of hitting.
So I don't know if that's just a story they're telling us so that we don't feel as bad for the person, or if it's true.
And if it is true that most people jumping from heights experience cardiac arrest on the way down, then how does somebody like Baumgartner jumping from 24 and a half miles not experience?
I know training, I know this and that.
I don't know how you go into the spin.
If you're jumping, if you just straight down, um obviously goes through the through the jet stream at some degree there's there's winds.
Uh there's just a lot of this that I and I I tried to find this out.
I spent a lot of time on the web searching various sites that can ask questions, and I never got any uh satisfactory answers to this.
And I don't know how he got the spin under control, but I saw that he did, and he was coming face down.
He was he was head down that spin face first, and that parachute pops at 7500 feet, and I thought it popped higher than it, but it didn't.
Popped at 7500 feet.
So originally supposed to pop at 5,000, but that's there's a there's a you know what the most dangerous, one of the most dangerous points in this whole thing yesterday was the first 4,000 Feet of the ascent.
That's not enough altitude to bail out of there if you have to and survive.
If something had gone wrong in the first 4,000 feet, could have been very bad.
Any point after that, something goes wrong, you can pop the hatch and go.
Can you imagine standing on that step, that capsule, which they say is the size of a skateboard.
You imagine standing there.
You know that you're 20, you've got claustrophobia, by the way.
He's got claustrophobia.
He had to deal with that.
They kept him very busy rehearsing everything going up.
Tiny capsule.
Steps out.
You're twenty-four miles up.
And there's only one thing you can do.
There's only one option you've got.
You can't go back in and come back down.
You have to jump.
I don't care how much training you've got.
I don't care how many times you've rehearsed it.
I don't care how many previous jumps from a hundred thousand feet.
You're still, that's got to be.
That's why he didn't dawdle.
He hit that step and bam.
He didn't stand there thinking about it much.
It's confident you got a parachute, you've got oxygen and so forth.
It's not it's not as though you're stranded and have no options.
Still an amazing thing.
An amazing thing.
And it wasn't, it's not, it's not an evil canival thing.
It's actually going to have real life application.
When they start selling trips into space for civilians, and something goes wrong, this is evidence that you could jump out of a distressed spacecraft at such an altitude and survive.
Maybe.
Well, no, it demonstrates that it's possible.
Maybe not that you could, but that it is possible.
With the right amount of training and all that.
I'm still fascinated by it, though.
I think everybody is.
That going into the spin and how he stopped the spin.
I mean, that's you lose it in a spin that rapid.
You lose all cognition.
And you can see it on the uh on the helmet cam if you haven't taken a chance to look at it.
Anyway, I want you to sit tight, folks, because we've got uh a barn burner here today, all kinds of great stuff as we set up for tomorrow night, and the media and all of Obama's advisors are just hellbent on him making sure the first thing out of his mouth, 47%.
I mean, they're pretty much telling you think Romney's gonna have an answer for it after all this?
I think so.
Anyway, you sit tight, coming back with all the rest of today's program right after this.
You're guiding light through times of trouble, confusion, murkiness, tumult, chaos, lies, distortions, voter suppression, depression, and all of that, and even the good times always here.
Well, the Washington Post has a new story on their latest poll.
And you know what's interesting about this Washington Post story on the latest poll is that you have to read a long way into the story to find out what the poll says.
And you can probably ascertain the reason for that.
It ain't good for Obama.
The headline in this story from the Washington Post, that's actually ABC News Washington, but this is the actually ABC story, enthusiasm rises for Romney ahead of debate.
My Gary Langer rising enthusiasm and declining anxiety.
Mark an energy boost among Mitt Romney's supporters since he prevailed in the first presidential debate.
But a persistent sense that he would favor the wealthy combined with easing discontent with the nation's direction, provide a retort for President Obama raising the stakes for the second debate tomorrow night.
You ought to see here how far down you have to read to get to any numbers in a story on a poll.
In fact, this ABC article puts up two sets of good numbers for Obama before they even get around to reporting the most important numbers on who's ahead if the vote were held today.
And even then, the horse race number is is presented in a in a highly confusing way.
But here's the deal.
This is what I'm paid for.
I went through this.
I I I weaved my way through all the BS in this story.
Romney is ahead of Obama in the latest ABC Washington Post poll among likely voters 49 to 46.
That is a three percentage point lead.
It is even more significant when you see that the poll oversampled Democrats by 9%.
Everything I just told you, you have to read at least half of this story to find.
And then you have to almost translate it because they present numbers favorable to Obama first.
But the bottom line is ABC Washington Post poll, it is Romney plus three in a Democrat sample of plus nine.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Okay, now I'm a little confused.
The politico is saying, let me read this.
Let me hang on just a second here.
Did I get this?
So the politico is saying Obama's up three in the Washington Post ABC poll.
Obama 49 Romney 46.
The way I looked at it in this story was Romney up 4946.
Anyway, uh there's a the crazy thing about this Washington Post ABC poll.
They oversampled Democrats by 9%.
In their own poll, they say that the enthusiasm for Obama is down eight percent since 2008.
And what they did, they replicated a 2008 turnout in their sample.
The 2008 turnout is going to be nothing like the turnout in 2012.
They say that the enthusiasm for Romney is 30% higher than it was for McCain.
And that the Democrats only had a 7% advantage 2008, yet they've got a 9% advantage in this poll.
doesn't make any sense.
And all of this data is buried so deeply in the poll.
The headline enthusiasm rises for Romney ahead of debate.
The bottom line is this.
The bottom line, two weeks ago, maybe even not that long, just prior to the last debate.
How many polls we shared with you here, how many polling organizations said that the election's over.
That Romney doesn't have a chance.
That he doesn't have a chance in Ohio or any of the swing states, doesn't have a chance.
It's over.
I don't know how many different polling units said this, but it was significant.
Was over.
Then the debate came.
And if we if we are to believe the media, the debate fired up the Republican base.
The debate gave the Republican base confidence.
The debate gave the Republican base enthusiasm.
And at the same time, the debate quelled enthusiasm for Obama.
And so the debate took what was a sure in the bag victory for Obama and turned it into a toss-up.
And since then, it has become almost over.
If Romney wins tomorrow night's debate decisively, many in the media think it's almost over, such is what they're saying.
And all it does is buttress the point that I have been making that these polls they're meaningless in April, in May, June.
They are used to shape public opinion.
They are used to move agendas.
And I am I want to tell you again with as with as much enthusiasm as I can muster here without raising my voice.
The whole point of every one of these polls prior to the present moment has been to suppress your vote, depress you, convince you it's over, get you not enthusiastic, lackadaisical, perhaps not even showing up.
And they have misunderstood throughout this entire period.
There's nothing they can do to keep you from voting.
There's no amount of suppression, no amount of Depression, no amount of attempts to make you think it's all over that it's going to keep you home.
This is what they have not understood.
But they are still desperate to prove to themselves that they have this kind of power, and so they engage in efforts to do so, shaping public opinion every every week, at least with these polls.
So the politico is right.
My my first interpretation was wrong.
Uh the ABC Washington Post poll has Obama up three, 496.
That is how poorly written this thing is.
I'm I tell you, you need a PhD in mathematics to translate this story.
And even with Obama up three, it's not it's not demonstrated anywhere in this poll where that makes any sense.
It's a story overall about the enthusiasm that has built up for Romney.
Now we move on to USA Today.
Shocker.
Obama Romney nearly tied in electoral college.
Again, last week, two weeks ago, it was over.
There wasn't a way to victory for Romney.
Particularly he had no prayer in Ohio, and without Ohio, it didn't matter.
Nothing else mattered.
Now they're essentially tied in the electoral college.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
Let's grab F. Chuck Todd here this this morning on the Today Show.
And I think this, given that these people all speak to each other and they all basically have the same worldview, all the media people, they all think the same way.
This is pretty much indicative of what the real mindset is behind closed doors out there.
Savannah Guthrie talking to F. Chuck Todd, NBC's White House correspondent, political director, and so forth.
She said you've seen the uh the polls, Chuck, nationally tight, Romney leading.
This is an election, it's going to be decided state by state.
How close is this race right now, if Chuck?
The numbers I've seen, and in talking to both campaigns, something shifted fundamentally.
And it's a dead heat, but it's one of these.
But even right after the debate, yeah, the Obama campaign thing.
Yes, it's a dead heat, but we've got all these fundamental advantages in the battleground state.
And the Romney folks would have conceded that.
The numbers I've seen privately come over of the last 72 hours.
We are in a real dead heat.
And you see that shift.
This means Savannah, this debate couldn't be more critical for President Obama.
If he loses this debate, then you could start seeing a momentum just continue to shift to Romney, and he would pull ahead in a lot of states.
The momentum could continue to shift, meaning the momentum is still with Romney.
Romney's crowds in Ohio.
Drive-by's even reported that they are Obama-sized crowds, that Romney is drawing.
Well, let me, that's been the case for a while.
That's been happening in Florida and a number of other states.
They just haven't been reporting it.
This enthusiasm for Romney, look, I don't deny that the debate buoyed everybody.
I don't deny that the debate jazzed everybody.
And in fact, I've got a story here from Ohio that talks about how the people were depressed and they were down in the dumps, and they were down in the dumps and depressed because of what the media was saying.
Then the debate came along and they're all fired up.
My contention was I don't care how depressed they say they were, they were still gonna vote.
They were still gonna vote because they tired of this.
They don't want any more of this.
They don't want any more excuses.
They don't want any more definitions of how 7.8% unemployment is the new norm.
They don't want to hear that a hundred fourteen thousand new jobs.
That's wonderful.
They don't want to hear that.
They don't want a president with a crumbling foreign policy.
They don't want any more a president.
Can't protect diplomats.
They don't want a president that's seemingly lost and clueless.
You really have to stop how much of the to use a cliche, how much of the bloom is off the rose of Obama.
You go back and compare Obama 2008, it was not and is not an exaggeration to say that he was messianic.
You go back and look at Grant Park on election night.
Look at the people in that crowd.
Zombies.
The walking dead.
Didn't matter what he said, it was What they wanted him to be.
That's what he was.
That's gone.
There is none of that.
All there is is a hard cold reality that he was not what anybody thought him to be.
Whatever it was that every individual that voted for this guy in 2008 made him out to be in their own mind.
He's not that anymore.
And there's no way of capturing it.
There's no way of getting it back.
He's got a record and it's dismal.
He can't defend it.
He doesn't even want to talk about it.
Even the New York Times, Jeff Zelony had to admit yesterday in Fox News that Romney is seeing massive enthusiastic crowds.
David Axelrod, we got the audio of this coming up.
Axelrod refuses to say whether Obama met with the national security team before heading to Las Vegas.
This isn't a Benghazi thing.
What a disaster.
Pat Smith, this woman whose son died, still hasn't gotten an answer.
They're still lying to her about why her son died, how her son died.
What happened?
She still can't get a straight answer.
We've got people throwing people under the bus in this administration.
This Benghazi thing isn't going to go away.
There's nothing they can do to make it go away.
And the way the administration's handling it is to make excuses and continue to hype a video and so forth.
It's really amateur hour.
And it's apparent to everybody.
I think this, I'm going to be very, very careful here.
But I I think this is much further along than even F. Chuck wants to admit the fact that F. Chuck says that it's do or die for Obama in this debate tomorrow.
What does that really mean?
If it's if it's due or die of one debate, one debate determines whether or not Obama wins re-election or not.
What does that really mean?
How far has Obama really fallen?
There is no enthusiasm behind Obama.
None.
There's nobody who wants any more of this.
I'm talking about majority numbers.
I'm just sure we've got people who think that Obama equals a free phone.
Let's just acknowledge as a given there's 30% of the people who either Democrats loyal to the party or who want big government to give them stuff.
But I think we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief.
We're nowhere near that.
The majority of the country.
Nowhere near it.
I think we've learned that to uh to this point.
We got a we've got a presidential candidate, incumbent, running for re-election, trying to get a majority of the moron vote.
We have a presidential candidate who ran a campaign that cast aside white working class voters as of last November, and they said so.
And since they announced that they were not going to try to get the votes of white working class voters, i.e.
mine workers.
They have been on a mission of depressing those people, suppressing their vote, not just ignoring them.
I take a quick timeout.
We'll do that, we'll continue with the audio.
Soundbite's gonna squeeze your phone calls into this.
Sit tight, we'll be right back.
Don't go away.
800-282-2882, the number when we get to the phones, if you want to appear.
Tom Brokaw this morning on the Today Show, Savannah Guthrie.
We've been known to hype things in the past here in the media, but this is a very high stakes moment.
What we have here is the media advising Obama on how to bring up Romney's 47% comment.
The president can take the playbook page from what Vice President Biden did the other night in one answer.
He talked about 47%.
Where are your tax returns?
We're gonna cut taxes for the middle class, and if you're making more than a million dollars a year, you're gonna raise taxes.
I think that we'll see the president coming after him saying, this is the Matt Romney today.
This is a different Mitt Romney than we just saw a month or so away.
Okay, so it here you obviously the media advising Obama, and I get fascinating.
They don't think Obama's capable of coming up with the stuff on his own.
They don't think Obama, the Messiah, is able to do this without aid and assistance.
But they also are of the belief that there are two or three different Romneys out there.
And that Romney has genuinely flip-flopped on things like tax cuts and so forth.
And they really think that there's an opening to go say that the Romney who showed up in the debate is not the real Romney.
That the Romney is the guy they've been caricaturing in their ads.
What am I missing here?
Clinton's out on the stump saying the same thing.
They're trying to manufacture this notion that Romney is flip-flopping.
I understand he's got that reputation.
It goes back to Republican primaries, but what is he flip-flopped on?
What did he say in the debate that he's not been saying throughout this entire campaign?
The difference in the debate was that he finally said it to Obama.
Finally, somebody said it to Obama's face.
And Obama had no answer for it.
Anyway, they think they're they're sitting here on a on a home run.
They think they're the grand slab with the 47%.
Where are your tax returns?
Romney's released his tax returns.
He's shown how charitable he is.
He has shown how much he's paid in taxes.
He has shown he's given more in charity percentage-wise and dollars than Obama and Biden combined.
We're going to cut taxes on the middle class.
If you're making more than a million a year, you're going to raise taxes.
It's 250,000.
Well, Biden was talking about raising it to a million, but they slapped him down at the uh at the regime.
I I hope they do bring all this stuff again.
It's Obama who's the sitting duck on all this.
It's Obama who's got indefensible tax policy.
It's Obama whose economic policies are proven to be destructive.
What are they doing?
Are they asking this guy to walk into a trap?
Frank Luntz was on uh CBS this morning with Charlie Rose, said the Romney campaign expects Obama's gonna be more aggressive.
What does that mean?
What risks are there for the president?
If I am Barack Obama, I'm focusing on one number, 47%.
And I'm trying to drive that home as much as I possibly can, particularly because it's a live studio audience, and they're the ones who are going to be asking the questions.
Which one of you think you fall in the 47% and Governor Romney, who do you represent here and who do you not?
As much as they're hitting on this 47%, if Romney does not have an answer for this, I will be stunned.
I have the answer to it.
This the the the 47% tape.
Where he's talking to his donors, you know, turn it around.
Hey, Barack, what about the bitter cling?
Just turn it right around if you want to, or deal with the 40%, do both.
Deal with the 47% and then say, well, you know, President Obama, he also said in a campaign speech to some donors that people weren't supposed to hear, and he didn't particularly like people who cling to their guns and their religions.
He's got a name for them, bitter clingers.
The thing about the 47% is, not the thing, because there are many things about it, but one of the things about the 47% is most people who are in the group don't think they are.
Human nature, human psychology.
They don't think they're in that group.
But Romney can explain this with pure honesty, without offending anybody.
Here's David Korn faced the nation yesterday during a discussion about the second debate tomorrow night, David Korn, who's Mother Jones magazine.
The 47% tape, which I'll take some credit for, really showed a lot.
And I think that's why Biden came back to it.
And I do think in the debate ahead, talking to people in the Obama camp, Obama is going to try to remind people that there is a gap between what Romney said in the debate and what he has or hasn't said previously.
Okay.
Uh I'm sitting here in stunned amazement.
And I'll explain why when we come back.
Now I've I'm sitting here and I'm I'm um I'm asking myself, what am I missing?
I ask myself every day, have am I out of touch?
Am I losing it?
I'm paranoid about this.
And I don't get this 47%.
I don't understand.
Biden used it.
Biden used it against against Ryan.
Ryan didn't even respond to it.
Biden is not considered the winner of that debate.
I want I I think I understand why this means so much to these guys.
And they're really, they're really off base and looking at the wrong thing.
The media is on this.
▲
Export Selection