All Episodes
Previous Next
May 29, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:06
May 29, 2012, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show, documented to be almost always right, ninety-nine point seven percent of the time.
I am your host, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations every day.
It's a thrill and a delight have you with us, my friends, where we combine the serious discussion of issues, often with irreverence and sarcasm, sometimes even satire and parody, all of which escapes the left.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800 282-2882.
And the email address L Rushbaugh at EIB net.com.
Scott Walker.
The Wisconsin recall vote.
It'll be this time next week.
June 5, this time next week.
And it is increasingly clear, folks, the Democrats think they're going to lose.
And it's been that way for a couple of weeks.
First the DNC pulled their money out of Wisconsin.
Then Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz started saying, Well, that doesn't mean anything.
I mean, Wisconsin's a standalone, and there's nothing really to learn there.
And then the other side of her mouth, she says something entirely different.
Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, she runs a Democrat National Committee.
She's really outdoing herself.
She told C SPAN a couple of days ago that a loss for the Democrat candidate in Wisconsin wouldn't have any implications for other races.
No.
Even the presidential race.
It doesn't mean anything.
Folks, they they put everything they had.
This was the union's last stand.
This recall election, they failed at every recall.
They tried to try to recall legislature.
They've tried to recall judges.
They've done everything they could.
The unions, the Democrats have done everything they could to get rid of Scott Walker.
Um Republicans elsewhere in government to re uh reverse Walker's policies.
She said on C SPAN, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, I think honestly there aren't going to be any repercussions.
It's an election that's based in Wisconsin.
But then she went to CNN.
And let's see, where is it?
She was on CNN.
I was uh Sunday morning on State of the Union with Candy Crowley.
Candy Crowley asked her about the Wisconsin recall.
So there's a recall movement, sitting governor, but uh he's now leading in the polls up there.
And you've said you don't think there's national implications to this, and yet you're gonna spend some of your time up there fundraising for the Democrat who's challenging Walker.
If the Republican governor should retain his seat up there, what'll it say about the power of unions who've been fighting him?
And what'll it say about putting Wisconsin in play this fall, maybe going for Romney.
Well, I am going there Tuesday to campaign with Mayor Barrett.
I think that he has a real opportunity to win.
Ultimately, I think Tom Barrett will pull this out.
But regardless, it's given the Obama for America operation an opportunity to do the dry run that we need of our massive, significant, dynamic grassroots special campaign, which can't really be matched by the Romney campaign or the Republicans because they've ignored on the ground operations.
All right, though, which is it?
Two days prior to this on C-SPAN, nah, doesn't mean anything.
It's not a standalone election.
It's just what's going on in Wisconsin.
Now on CNS, somebody got hold of her.
Somebody said, Blabbermouth, what are you doing to us?
Now all of a sudden, Wisconsin's a referendum.
Now it's a dry run.
Now it's a test run of their massive, dynamic grassroots presidential campaign, which Romney can't match.
Ever heard of the Tea Party, Debbie?
Now I know she's got to say this stuff.
I uh but but I think these people are delusional.
Fully delusional.
This Wisconsin race, I can't tell you how this has upset them.
This was getting rid of Walker was going to be easy.
Uh And it's it's history repeating itself because they go into all of these elections this way.
Well, Walker, if the union's gonna win big Democrat state always has been, but nothing's gone the way they figure it in the 2010 midterms, these primaries where Obama is only getting 60% of the vote.
I'm telling you inside the Obama campaign, they don't know what's going on.
They didn't have a plan for this.
They wanted Romney.
They thought there's gonna be a slam dunk to occupy Wall Street and attacking Bain Capitol.
They really believed, Obama really believed that a majority of this country, a majority of the people who vote in this country really want a welfare state.
They've got themselves convinced of this, and it and it's it's mind-boggling to watch this.
And I think back to what we've been talking about uh previous hour, people sense this too.
This is and it's not doesn't resonate.
This is this is not the country people thought they lived in.
I think the Democrats are heading for a big shock, the likes of which they can't even conceive.
I think they are so out of touch.
Which is good.
And of course, that's today, and anything I always add the caveat, anything can change on a dime in politics.
But if it were held today, slam dunk, I don't even think it'd be close to uh tell you the truth.
But didn't she just she just made it a forecast for him?
She has handed Obama a horrible storyline there.
They're not as smart folks as you give them credit for.
She just said that Wisconsin is a dry run for Obama's massive presidential effort, his get out the vote techniques, the uh massive ground swell of the grassroots uprising.
Now what if they if they lose Wisconsin, what has she done?
She has just set the stage for Obama's whole dry run test run to go up and smoke to be discredited like crazy.
Now, how many of you change the subject?
How many of you have often thought, often believed that if the Republicans would make some real genuine outreach effort to the black community and just get three to five percent of the black vote.
If we could do that, that would end it.
A lot of people believe that.
And the rule of thumb, standard operating procedure opinion is that Republicans just never make the effort.
They just they don't know how, they just they they really uh outreach African American community.
Don't do it.
They should try it.
Well, Romney did.
Romney went to Philadelphia.
The Washington Post has the details.
When Mitt Romney came to an inner city charter school last Thursday to promote his new education agenda, outreach to the African American community.
He received a history lecture about the persecution of blacks in America and the struggles of African American children to meet the academic achievements of their white counterparts.
What persecution would that be?
Persecution of blacks in America.
What are we talking?
Affirmative action?
What is this persecution that's going on?
So Romney goes in for some outreach.
This story, by the way, it was in the Washington Post and it wasn't picked up.
It didn't get very much attention.
But let me briefly tell you what happened.
Romney goes to this charter school of West Philadelphia.
Local officials attending the event lectured him and insulted him.
The Obama campaign organized so-called residents to protest across the street from the school where Romney was.
They shouted at Romney and they told him to get out of their neighborhood.
Now I want you to just try to imagine the outrage from our news media if the Romney campaign had organized whites to tell Obama to get out of their neighborhood.
But there was no outrage.
This story caused none.
I mean, even the Washington Post sounds amused.
They they think this was funny, what happened.
But you see, apparently the Republicans are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
Not once in this entire article is it ever mentioned that Romney supports school vouchers, which Obama doesn't.
That's something you think that local school officials would support as well.
The article quotes the mayor of Philadelphia, Michael Nutter, as saying that Romney, quote, suddenly somehow found West Philadelphia.
Nutter said, I don't know that a one-day experience in the heart of West Philly is enough to get you ready to run the United States of America, unquote.
Now, that's a little ironic, given that you might think Mayor Nutter would be in hiding after what he and his fellow Democrats have done to that once great city.
Then there's a quote from a woman named Madeline Dunn, who said she was, quote, personally offended that Romney would visit her neighborhood.
She said it was quote, absolutely denigrating for Romney to come in here and speak his garbage.
Now, who is this babe?
Madeline Dunn.
She's a longtime Democrat political activist.
She has served as a chairwoman for the radical Philadelphia Congress of the National Congress of Black Women.
She's currently listed as one of Obama's truth team.
This is not in the story.
I wanted to find out who why was this woman being quoted?
I was curious.
Who is this woman?
The post doesn't tell us.
I found that stuff out on my own.
They just portray her as a as another legitimately and genuinely outraged resident.
The bottom line is Romney attempting outreach, goes into an inner city school to talk about his education ideas in West Philly and is basically told to get the hell out.
What are you doing here, pal?
We don't want you here.
It won't be long before we hear some civil rights leader saying they don't care about us, the Republicans, they don't care about us, they never they never reach out, they never they never try.
So it's a it's a damned if you do and damned if you don't situation.
Which is why this this I don't blame Romney for trying this.
I in fact I give him credit for it, but it's why I am of the belief that there's no compromise here.
I mean, Romney shows up and they basically gonna say for publication that they're offended he would dare come into their neighborhood and denigrate him for doing so that when he what he talks, he's speaking garbage.
What in the world is there to compromise there?
Where is the common ground?
That's why to me defeating these people is what's paramount, not getting along with them and not trying to find common areas of agreement.
And particularly in an election year, I mean, I wouldn't expect these people to do anything other than what they are doing.
They're Obama voters, they're Obama supporters.
They're Democrats.
They're not interested in what Romney has to say.
Now, Romney, to his credit, goes in there, and he can always say that he did.
And he can talk about the effort that he made.
But note that it wasn't widely reported.
You probably didn't know about this.
I mean, hell, if Dawn hadn't heard about the new South Beach diet, I'm sure you hadn't heard about this story.
We'll be back after this.
Now, right, if Romney had not gone to a black neighborhood to campaign, they'd call him a racist.
You know how long this stuff's been going on.
Does the name Jack Kemp ring a bell?
As far back as the early 90s, Jack Kemp had an idea for Republican outreach To inner city communities.
One of the ideas he came up with was something called Enterprise Zones.
And in theory, they're pretty cool.
There aren't any to speak of, not for lack of effort.
Just the outreach isn't really desired.
They talk about it, but all they do is talk.
Demand outreach.
Show us you care.
Show us you're not racist.
Show us that you're not the KKK.
So Romney goes in.
What are you doing here?
Get the hell out of our neighborhood.
You make me sick.
You got no business being here.
Then you got media people that tweet, well, what the hell did Romney think was going to happen?
He goes into a West Philadelphia neighborhood.
What did he think was going to happen?
Well, who's the idiot that sent Romney in there?
There's our media tweets.
They not think he'd be peppered by pro-Obama protesters.
Who was the idiot sent Romney in there?
And once again, it's accepting a premise.
The premise is that we don't care about minorities, which is bogus.
We care about everybody.
We just don't see people as minorities.
We don't see people as members of groups.
Folks, let me, I need to talk about something here.
I've I'm always uncomfortable talking about this, but and I haven't even seen it, but I've started playing golf over the weekend, and a friend of mine says, by the way, these stories about how you've lost audience in uh in in April.
I said, What?
Oh, yeah, these stories are everywhere.
I said, I haven't seen one.
Oh, yeah, the story is all about how your audience is.
It's not.
It's crazy.
We're up.
It's incredible.
I haven't seen the stories.
But I look it, I know what's going on.
It's the ongoing effort.
It's been going on for 23, almost 24 years now.
In this case, uh, in large part, there's some radio people actually behind it.
These trumped up bogus stories.
But let me tell you who's really in trouble.
We're not in trouble here in any way, shape, manner, or form.
We are as strong or stronger than ever, audience wise, business wise, all of this is bogus.
It's it's laughable to hear about this stuff.
It's also instructive because even my friends reading this stuff think it's true.
One of them gets it, one of them didn't, but but it's just the power of the printed word.
There happened to be over the weekend a story in uh New York magazine by a guy named Joe Hoke, Joe Hagen.
And it's a story about the New York Times.
What happened when they got rid of their CEO, Janet Robinson?
Janet Robinson was Arthur Schultzberger Jr.'s right hand.
I mean, she ran the newspaper.
They were inseparable.
They were a platonic married couple.
They were that close.
And she was the one who was trying to help the paper recover from all the lost advertising revenue.
You want to talk about people ratings down, revenue down.
It's the New York Times, and this magazine story, New York Magazine, makes it very clear.
But before I get to the details of that, what happened was that Little Pinch got a girlfriend that he met over at Davos.
She had something to do with the World Economic Forum.
I can't think of her name right now.
Claudia Gonzalez is a Mexican marketing executive who formerly worked for the World Economic Forum in Davos.
Well, it turns out she didn't like Janet Robinson.
Little Pinch gets a girlfriend.
Fell madly in love with her.
He was, I guess, got divorced in 2008, fell madly in love with this babe, and this babe then started telling him that he didn't uh she didn't like the way Janet Robinson running a paper.
The upshot is Robinson gets canned a 24 million dollar golden parachute to get her to go away.
The rest of the Times employees were fit to be tied over this because the unions are having to give things up, they're giving up pensions, they're giving up uh health care, uh, no wage increases and so forth, and the CEO, an exec, a suit, was paid 24 million dollars to go away because Pinch's girlfriend didn't like her, is essentially the upshot of the story.
But here are the details of the New York Times.
Next time you read about supposed problems here, let me just give you the real truth here.
In the era of Arthur Schultzberger Jr., I'm reading from New York magazine.
When newspapers have flailed under new digital realities, the New York Times Company has shrunk dramatically.
Once it was a wide-ranging media empire of newspapers and TV stations and websites, even owned part of the Boston Red Sox.
The New York Times Company was worth almost seven billion.
Today it's essentially two struggling newspapers, a very small internet company, and it's all worth less than one billion dollars today.
If you've ever heard of the internet company, a music company called Pandora, it's worth twice what the New York Times is worth.
Pandora, a music streaming outfit.
Despite the shrinkage, the New York Times company has retained essentially the same top heavy management, which it has kept well compensated.
So I don't mean to hit on little pinch here, but but since he took over, they've built this new building that they couldn't afford.
They've done all this crazy stuff, paid $24 million to their CEO to go away.
$7 billion company is now worth one billion dollars.
And you know who's really up to it?
Apparently there are 40 members of the Ox Schulzberger family who live off the dividends.
And there aren't any anymore.
And they're all upset.
The newspaper or the magazine describes them as uh people who have respectable but low-paying jobs, job like admirable but low-paying jobs like academics, artists, uh, and so forth.
$7 billion to $1 billion less than $1 billion in less than 10 years.
Now, if you want to know who's in trouble media-wise, it's newspapers and liberalism, folks, not us.
I got back to the phones here in a jiffy.
I just want to read you one more little excerpt here from uh the New York magazine piece on the New York Times at Twilight.
That's that's the title of it, New York Times at Twilight.
That was fine for Schultzberger and the five other family members with salaried positions at the company.
But the wider family of sons and daughters and nieces and nephews, and there are 40 of them.
See, what happened was that every year the Times Company paid dividends, and the family described here as academics, novelists, musicians, and psychotherapists, divvy up, or 40 of them, they divvied up the 20 million dollars that were that were paid every year.
And now the dividend's been suspended because there isn't the money for it.
And so this story describes the pain and suffering of the family members.
They're now forced to sell stock at a historical low just to raise money to live.
Most of them have admirable, admirable, if low wage jobs.
So the heartstrings are being tugged here over the circumstances for the family members that feed off the New York Times.
Meanwhile, you have a newspaper here that rips the hell out of people at work.
And claims they're not being taxed enough.
You have a newspaper company that's value has shrunk from over seven billion to under one billion.
The dividends have been suspended.
And the family's not.
I mean, they're having to sell stock at low prices just to be able to live.
And this is not unique.
This is happening.
The New York Times Picky Union, I didn't know this.
I didn't know this until yesterday.
Have you heard the New York Times Pickyune?
The newspaper in New Orleans is only going to publish three days a week.
I didn't find that out till last night.
Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, I think.
They have an online version, but the printed pay and uh Super Bowl's gonna be there this year.
I mean, for all this talk, folks, I don't want you to ever, we are strong as we have lost any average.
Well, we've regained whatever advertisers lost.
There were three.
This is all a bunch of BS, and I really don't want you Falling for it or worrying about it or believing it.
The real problem in media is being experienced on the left.
CNN.
54,000 viewers.
Oh, speaking of them, they've come up with a fix.
They're going to, they're going to now focus on international news.
That's the answer.
CNN is going to do more international news.
They're going to tell us more about the Muslim Brotherhood, for example, and the Greek debt crisis, and what's happening in Singapore.
That's the answer.
I kid you not.
I think I read this in the well, the reason they're doing is CNN International is doing well.
Worldwide, it does do well.
So they're doing, okay, well, that's working.
Let's try that here domestically.
They're not going to stop American operations.
But I'm just I'm just telling you.
MSNBC to anybody listening or watching for the all intents and purposes.
All these newspapers, advertising revenues down, circulation is down.
People want to sit here and lie about what's happening on this program.
They're welcome to do it, but they better start paying attention themselves.
Here's Ralph in the Jersey Short.
Ralph, thank you for waiting.
It's great to have you here.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you doing?
I'm okay, doing pretty well.
Well, I I'm I'm not.
I'm very, very upset.
First of all, I just want you to know that I'm a former U.S. Marine recon Vietnam veteran.
Uh and to hear what I heard this morning on this radio uh on this station from Haraldo Rivera, who, by the way, is very dangerous because he likes to make people believe that he's uh a conservative, but oh my God.
Well, well, what?
Yeah.
Hold it.
Hold ho.
Haraldo is is trying to do what?
Make people think he's conservative?
Yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
He's you know, middle of the road, but I lean to the conservative side, you know, and that kind of this morning he said Well, how's that working out for him?
Well, here's the thing.
You know the uh the poll you gave before about the veterans like myself that are going to vote for Romney, it's like 28% more.
Yeah.
His comment to that was, and I heard it with my own ears, that's probably because they're from the South, they're religious and not very bright.
Probably Republicans.
That should be just words.
And I almost I I was I I was out doing my run this morning and I almost ran into a wall.
Well, look, this uh should not be news to you.
I mean uh uh Ralph, you know full well that the Democrat Party, even pre-Obama, pre-Horaldo, the Democrat Party has denigrated.
This has made me so mad over the years, and I've talked about it in this program.
They have claimed the only reason people join the military is because they're either stupid or America is in such bad shape and is such an unjust country that that's the only chance some of these poor people have to get an education and get a job.
America is such a forlorn place that the military is their only option.
And I've I've read this, and and alternately they've they've, as you heard, they have really been insulting of military people as they're short-sighted, they're not very bright, they're just a bunch of warmongering second amendment types, can't wait to pull a trigger, all this kind of stuff.
And I've I've always asked myself, okay, maybe you're anti-war, but why denigrate these people?
What's in it for you to denigrate these people?
They've done nothing but offer their lives in sacrifice for your freedom.
Why do you find it necessary to insult them?
What is it that makes the left think they have to go out personally impugn people like you?
You've never done anything to them.
All you've done is is put yourself up as the line of defense for them.
I've I've it's always made me very angry.
I've I've I've I've well I've say I've never understood it.
I do understand it.
I know exactly why they do it.
They're just flat out mean people when you get right down to it.
Um and it's really no more complicated than that, but there's some ideological aspects to it as well.
But it it frosts me.
Okay, so you're anti-war.
You may not like war.
You may think we shouldn't be in Iraq, you maybe think we shouldn't have gone to Afghanistan.
These people volunteered.
So we even have to denigrate that.
We have to wait we we can't say they volunteered because they patriots because they want to guarantee and defend this country and protect freedom.
No, no.
It has to be something else.
It has to be they're stupid and have no other opportunity in life.
Or it has to be the country sucks, and there's no opportunity unless they do this.
And they're all a bunch of hayseeds, all a bunch of Republicans, a bunch of people been fooled by religion.
I just it really irritates me when these people get denigrated and impugned like this.
And it always has.
And if if I'm I'm sad to hear that that's for crying out loud, Obama went out yesterday.
He knows he's in pro.
He saw that Gallup poll.
Obama's Memorial Day speech was all about defending Vietnam vets.
He all he went back and relived Vietnam vets coming home and being spat on and disrespected.
And he stood up for them.
Yeah, by his fellow liberals.
That's that's the people that were doing it exactly right.
Obama's crowd were engaging in all those quote unquote atrocities against returning Vietnam vets.
But he knows the trouble he's in with the military.
Understandably so.
So I tell you, if if what you heard actually happened, it's that's that's not helping uh not helping uh Obama.
Anyway, I look, I'm glad you called Ralph.
I appreciate it.
I got to take a brief time out, folks.
We're coming back with much more right after this.
Don't go away.
Hi, welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh, and the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I want to share with you an email that we got at uh at two if by tea.
This has been such a rewarding thing for me.
I must, I must tell you.
Uh two if by tea, I mean, we had uh a lot of reasons for doing this.
One of the reasons, and we named it two if by tea is a takeoff on two if by sea, one if my land, two if by sea, Paul Revere, America's founding, uh the liberals are coming, and the liberals are coming, we're trying to have some fun with it.
But uh we we have a sponsor, the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
One of the things that we really wanted to do with this, with the website that we have and so forth, is to connect to the to the nation's founding and to have the the product be tied as much as it could to the decency and goodness of the country.
And we get emails from customers like you wouldn't believe, and they all talk about how much they love the tea.
And it really, you know, I didn't bring this up to mention this, but I'm telling you, it is the best bottled iced tea in this country ever anywhere.
It's not even close.
And I know you would think I would say that, but I wouldn't if it wasn't true.
I'd talk about anything else.
If the tea wasn't that good, I'd try to cover it up by saying it's it worth it in other ways.
But we got an email from a man who was a won a prize on our most recent sweepstakes.
He was a second prize winner, which in this was the ride of a lifetime prize, and it wasn't, it wasn't much.
It was it was a a treasure chest of mementos from Boston, things that have to do with Paul Revere's ride and the whole founding of the country from there.
And this man took his son, took his family to Washington for the Memorial Day weekend, and they took some pictures.
They went to the Iwo Jima.
Well, they went to all the places, but they took some pictures in front of the Iwojiwa memorial, which is uh uh that that famous picture planting the flag is on the rear of our label on two if by tea.
So they went there and they took pictures, and they've got the uh the old Paul Revere hat, this man and his son, uh, and they took pictures of themselves holding the prize, the treasure chest, And a bottle of tea.
And the uh uh the his son is is holding up a sign that they made two if by tea.
Uh happy memorial day.
Uh best wishes, and man's name is Bud, and his son's name is Carter, and they sent this this little note to uh one of fact we we've got one of the greatest staff members at 2 if by T. I hope, I hope we never lose this woman, Liz Cross.
Everybody, every customer loves Liz Cross.
It's it's I've never had an employee get this kind of positive, not even you, Snerdley.
I mean, it it everybody deals with Liz Cross has to tell us about it.
Dear Liz, thank you so much for the two if by T Ride of a Lifetime Prize.
It arrives Saturday, and it's awesome.
Here are a few pictures of me and my son Carter, the prize suitcase, uh, and the two if by tea at the Iwo Jima Memorial taken this morning on Memorial Day.
Please pass along my sincere thanks to Rush and Catherine and everybody else at 2F by T, and thank you all for supporting our troops and keep up the amazing work and have a great memorial day.
And I'm gonna post this, the pictures and so forth at uh at Rushlimbaugh.com.
And they did all of this on their own.
Going to Washington was not part of prize.
It was their own initiative to go to um uh the Ewo G Memorial, just like is on our label on the bottle.
And we didn't ask him for pictures, and we didn't ask him to dress up with these uh Paul Revere hats, and they didn't uh get those as part of uh part of a prize.
They did this all on their own.
And they were not even the grand prize winners.
The grand prize winners went to Boston, Freedom Trail Ride, all of that stuff.
These are the second place guys.
And they were just uh ecstatic.
So I told Coco to be ready to post that uh as soon as I talked about it.
And I this is a good occasion, good opportunity here to uh to make that happen.
So names man's name is Bud Harrell and his son Carter.
And you guys don't know who Liz Cross.
You've never you that's right, Liz Cross has never been in here, you know who Liz Cross is.
That's why she's down in uh uh the Regis office.
Is where Liz is.
Global warming skeptics.
This this is a this is a study.
It is a fabulous, it's in the it's uh in a magazine called Nature Climate Change.
They did a study published it Sunday, found that people who are not that worried about the effects of global warming have a higher level of scientific knowledge than the advocates.
People like me have more scientific knowledge than the average advocate of global warming.
And this publication, by the way, is not some secret right-wing think tank publication.
Brief time out.
Be back right after this.
Don't go away.
New York State has lost 3.4 million residents in 10 years.
Taxes.
3.4 million residents.
I, El Rushbo, am one of them.
Uh, we'll have details tomorrow.
Thanks so much for being with us today.
We appreciate it each and every day more than you know, and we'll see you right back tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection