All Episodes
Previous Next
May 29, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:51
May 29, 2012, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 podcast.
Yeah, hang on.
I'm looking for something.
I'm going to change the audio sound bites here on the fly again if I got to find it.
Where is it?
Grab number four.
So we're going to have number 21 to number four, then we'll go to the top, all right.
Hi, folks.
How are you?
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh.
What is going to be a short week?
Well, not short, but shorter.
Here on the Excellence at Broadcasting Network.
Great to have you here, as always.
Telephone number.
If you want to be on the program, 800-282-288-2.
And the email address L Rushball at EIBNet.com.
Bob Schiefer at CBS.
It's not going well out there.
For the drive-by's state controlled media, they just don't quite understand.
For example, yesterday on Slay the Nation, a Sunday.
See?
Feels like Monday.
Sunday and all day yesterday, I thought today was going to be Wednesday.
Really, I mean, I spent a lot of time, not a lot of time, but a couple of instances yesterday when I was thinking I got to do tomorrow.
Tomorrow's going to be Wednesday.
And I was looking at my calendar for Wednesday stuff I've got to do.
And like, oh no, that's Tuesday.
I'm free.
I'm home clear.
I scheduled nothing.
Other than the standard ordinary show prep stuff.
Anyway, Bob Bob Schaefer, Slay the Nation, had Ed Gillespie on.
And they were talking about Corey Booker and Obama's hostility to business and so forth.
And Schaeffer tried to blame Romney for all this.
He said to Gillespie, you know, isn't it a fair thing that Governor Romney's the one who started this, the attacks on Bain.
Romney started this.
I mean, he's the one who came in and started talking about all these jobs he had created, when in fact, I mean, venture capitalists don't sit at the table and say, let's think about some plan to see how we can create a bunch of jobs.
They sit down and say, let's figure out how we can make some money here.
So Ed Gillespie said, well, Bob, there's a there's a correlation, buddy, uh, between making money and growing a company and then job creation.
It kind of all is tied together, but what he was trying to say, Bob old Buddy O'Powell was that you grow the business first.
The purpose, the motivation, the inspiration is to have a business that's in trouble.
You save it, you bail it out, or a startup, either way, you want to grow it, and you grow it.
And you need people when you grow it.
It's a fine line here.
These libs are just so trying to find any dirt on Romney.
They're trying to find any insensitive insensitivity.
So here we are in a period of time where there is no job growth.
There is no job creation.
Um, in fact, a lot of people are gonna have more details on this.
A lot of people are gonna be losing unemployment benefits in the next couple of weeks, couple of months, and that's gonna result in the unemployment rate coming down.
People are gonna go off the unemployment rolls, which is gonna cause the unemployment rate to fall.
No jobs will be created.
The media is even reporting this gleefully.
They're looking forward to being able to reduce the unemployment rates.
Anyway, they're trying to show here that Romney has no sensitivity.
That that private equity doesn't have any sensitivity.
They don't care about creating jobs, and Obama does.
Obama cares about creating jobs.
And Romney said all he cares about is profit.
No, no, no, no.
It's not, it's a trick, and they're using the old feelings versus fact.
And I love Gillespie's answer.
Hey, look, Bob, you know, there's a correlation between making money and growing a company and job creator.
They all go hand in hand, Bob.
We're just talking about why people invest their money.
Nobody sits around and say, you know what, we need job growth.
I think I'm gonna start a company, so we create jobs.
That and we don't start a company to create health care benefits for the community.
It's not why it happens.
But nobody on the left in the media anywhere else seems to have any under, especially news people.
They think news divisions ought to be untied from any profit and loss sheet.
I mean, from Dan Blather to the to Klondike, all these people, they all believe that news divisions were serving Such an important constitutional role that they could not be bound by the standard profit or loss sheet.
That they should be permitted to lose money.
Their calling was so high.
They don't have the slightest idea about real world economics and how this all works.
All they know is feelings and emotion.
And when they get on to something that they think they can portray a conservative is heartless, then they head right down that path, and that's what they think they're getting done here.
The fact of the matter is that the Bain attack by Obama is backfiring big time, and even Jeff Zelony of the New York Times says so in an audio soundbite.
But that wasn't the only Schiefer instance.
Here's another one.
Slay the nation.
Bob Schiefer talking to uh Bob Gibbs, Robert Gibbs, the former White House press secretary, now senior campaign advisor.
Schiefer said the uh the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday campaign would actually become more aggressive with these attacks on uh on Romney and Bain.
They seem to be buying more time to run these ads.
Have you done some polling?
Why are you so aggressive so soon?
Let's be clear.
This is the central and only point that Mitt Romney brings up that, in the words of his campaign would make him an economic savior for this country.
What Bain Capital never did uh was focus on job creation.
That's not what uh Bain Capital does.
It loads up companies with debt, it takes money out of those companies and pays those investors.
It's not about job creation, and that's what Mitt Romney is running on.
These guys, I tell you, folks, um, it's an insult to your intelligence and to mine.
It'll play with certain people.
I mean, the the the the shallow surface uh types who uh hear job creation and think that uh that's all that's that's on the agenda here, and not realizing it's part of an all-encompassing process and equation that loads up companies with debt, takes money out of those companies, uh pays those investors, not about job creation.
That's what Mitt Romney is running on.
So Schiefer, beside himself.
Bob is exasperated here because he wants what happened to Hope and Change.
What happened to what happened to all of this unity?
Here, listen to Schiefer in the next budget.
You know, one of the refreshing changes when the president was elected, uh, he talked about hope and change.
Whatever happened to hope and change.
Now it seems he's just coming right out of the box with these old-fashioned negative ads.
All campaigns seem to think are the basis of all campaigns.
No, no, Bob, look, there's going to be a choice in the selection.
That's what this campaign is going to be about.
Are you going to be better?
Who are you going to be better off with in the next four years?
Look, this is why I don't watch these shows anymore.
It's why I watch very little cable news.
It's so formulaic.
And it's utterly predictable.
You you know the kind of questions you're going to get from the host based on who the guest is, and you know the formulaic answers you're going to get.
Now you don't have to watch Face the Nation to know that the Democrats are going to go after Bain Capital and Romney because they go into debt and reward the investors, not create jobs.
You know that's going to happen.
And I frankly, it's a waste of time.
For anybody who knows what's going on, who says a slight slightest understanding that it's a waste of time to watch these shows anymore.
I think.
But Schiefer, what happened to Hope and Change?
Bob, if you're not paying attention, Obama ran as a percentage more negative ads in the 2008 campaign than in the history of presidential campaigns.
Barack Obama did.
And if you add the ads against Hillary in the primary, why it's not even close.
Obama is the king.
Have you ever heard of Saul Olinski, Bob?
So Bom's he's ringing his hands.
Well, whatever happened, all this positive stuff.
Well, whatever happened to Hope and Change.
What hope and change is a joke.
It's a nickname for Obama now.
Here, grab audio soundbite number two.
E.J. Dion Jr., where was his on Meet the Press?
And it's the same answer, and it's the same thing, Only this time using me.
They're talking about Obama's attack on Romney at Bain Capitol, and again.
The ad in question attacks Bain for doing things at a time Romney wasn't even at Bain, number one.
Number two, the guy running Bain now is one of Obama's biggest campaign bundlers.
Here's E.J. Dion Jr.'s take.
The argument over Bain is actually part of a substantive argument over the future of American capitalism.
First, if Romney from the beginning was saying his role as a job creator at Bain was a key reason why he should be president.
Well, thanks to this exchange, even Rush Limbaugh has now said no, the private equity companies are not about creating jobs.
So I think they've already made that point.
So yeah, I said that.
But this is taking me out of context in order to plug me in to their little hole or their little maze.
Anyone who listens to this program or listens to me knows exactly what I said about this, what I mean by it.
And this is this is the problem I get into.
You know, I live in Realville.
And in real, things are really simple.
They're so simple, they're hard to understand.
And most people, Realville's very small town, folks.
There are very few people.
We got fewer people in Realville than live in Rio Linda.
Realville sometimes slaps you upside the face.
Realville does not have much in common with platitudes and hope and change real has to what is.
What is private equity?
Where has private equity been?
What does it do?
You can you I'll tell you one thing.
You listen to every Democrat who's come out in opposition to Obama overdoing this.
They know exactly what private equity is.
Private equity builds.
Private equity saves.
Private equity grows when it works.
Sometimes it fails, like every investment can fail.
There's no sure shot.
Everything's a risk.
These are risk takers.
They try to take the best calculated risk they can.
If it works, jobs are saved first.
Yeah, some people are laid off as the company is downsized, but as opposed to everybody being laid off and the company going down the tubes, private equity comes in and saves it.
They lop off what's not working, they reorganize it, and then they in turn try to grow it.
And if they do, jobs are created.
And in the process, there are profits.
In the process, the company grows.
And everybody wins.
And that's not hard to understand.
When it doesn't work, it doesn't work.
When it works, it works.
In Romney's case, 80% of Bain's investments worked.
They had an 80-20 success rate.
Pure and simple.
The regime is focusing on one thing.
Romney said that he created $100,000.
I know why Romney said it.
Because it's the meme.
It's the theme of the day.
We got Obama who's destroying job.
The idea here that Mitt Romney is anywhere near Obama's league in job destruction is laughable.
We've got a genuine job killer working in the Oval Office.
Barack Hussein Obama has presided over some of the worst job news situation mess in the history of the country since the Great Depression.
And in that, Romney is saying I know how to create jobs.
And things I did, 100,000 jobs are created.
Then the attack on Bain comes.
And this leads people to try to explain to other people what the purpose of private equity, what the purpose of any.
Look, whoever founded Johnson and John.
Let me use me.
1988.
We decided to do the EIB network.
We did not do a whole bunch of audience research.
All we did Was say, you know what?
We got a good show here.
We're going to try to syndicate it in the daytime.
It's never worked before on a mass scale.
It's never made any real money.
Syndicated talk in the daytime has never made any.
And the dirty little secret was it didn't make any money at night either.
Particularly overnight.
May have made some money at night, but but overnight, midnight to six, that was lost leader time.
Nobody bought ads then.
It's how.
Remember the old Mutual News Network?
Well, Mutual was the network syndicator Larry King for Midnight Six.
Larry King's real value to mutual was that if a station wanted Larry King's show, they had to carry mutual news in the daytime.
They had to carry mutual news.
Therefore, or they had to run mutual news spots during the day.
Therefore, Mutual, as a network, got their spots aired when there was an audience.
Not when King's show was on.
King's value was not his show per se and the audience there, but the fact that his show was popular and people wanted it, so they had to carry mutual news during the daytime if they wanted Larry King.
That's the way the business worked.
But at no time did mutual news, you know, what we're here to do is create jobs.
So when we started the EIB network, everybody in the world said, you can't do it, Rush.
We wish you the best, but it's never worked.
Radio in the daytime's got to be local.
Local phone numbers, local issues, local hosts.
This has never worked.
Okay, well, then if it doesn't work, we just join the long list of failures and move on to something else.
If it works, fine.
But at no time when we started the EIB network, did anybody say that our purpose here is to create jobs in radio.
We were trying to do a good show that attracted an audience so we could charge confiscatory advertising rates.
And that's where it stopped.
Now, what's happened?
Since that success, since the EIB network success, look at all the AM radio stations still on the air who probably wouldn't be.
Look at all the conservative.
There has been massive job creation.
There has been massive amounts of new money brought into the business.
We expanded the pie.
But not once did any of us say our purpose is to create jobs.
But we did with massive growth.
Why are you frowning, sir?
Is this hard to understand?
I have created more jobs than Obama and Romney put together, damn right.
And for a longer period for 23 years.
I have a greater record of job creation to Romney or Obama.
And in the process of creating all those jobs, I still have mine.
I did not cannibalize myself.
I got to take a break.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
Rushly boss saving more industries and creating more jobs than Barack Obama and Mitt Romney combined.
Here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Great to have you.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program.
800 282-2882.
Look at how outrageous the uh I don't know, the th the theme of the day is.
Obama is trying to create a can convince the public that Romney's a big job killer, and that Obama is a big spending cutter.
Really?
That's what the regime is attempting to pull off today.
Romney, a big job killer.
Romney puts people out of work.
Romney takes over companies and folds them and takes nothing but the money that's left for himself.
Romney's a corporate rapist.
That's all Romney is.
But Obama.
Why he's the biggest spending cutter that we've ever.
This is why living in a real ville is such a challenge, and why it can be so frustrating at times.
Everything coming out of the Obama administration is a lie.
Everything about their campaign is a lie.
Everything about themselves, everything about Romney.
Everything they're saying is misdirection, purposeful lying.
No question about it.
And sit here and and and listen, try to digest this stuff, is it's funny, yeah, but sometimes it gets frustrated.
Look at the EIB network.
Go back to that for just a second.
We started.
The EIB network was started with private equity.
One man's money started the EIB network.
A man by the name of Ed McGlachlin, who was the former president of the ABC radio networks who retired when Capital Cities merged with and essentially took over ABC.
Ed was one of the ABC execs that went off on his own, and his um his package when he left, they gave him two hours of satellite time from noon to two to fill as he chose.
That's that's one of the forms of compensation.
And then using his own money, built this network.
He was the founder.
And it's all private equity.
And at no point in any of this did any one of us ever talk, yeah, what we really can't wait to do here, create jobs.
That was not the focus.
It never is.
It's just automatically assumed you're going to need good people if the thing works or to make it work.
Now, let me let me give you the numbers, folks.
Now these are approximate numbers.
1988, when this program started, I was set the stage for you again, 1988, which to me seems just like yesterday.
It's a long time ago.
It's almost 24 years ago now.
August 1st, 1988.
The only cable news network was CNN.
That was it.
You had CBS, NBC, and ABC.
They still had their monopoly 24 years ago.
They had a news monopoly and a monopoly over what was reported and what wasn't reported.
And they had a monopoly on commentary.
You had the Washington Post, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, USA Today was up and running.
You had Time and Newsweek, U.S. News.
That was the major media.
Then you had all the local papers.
That was it.
At the same time in 1988, there were 200 radio stations in America that were doing talk.
And not very many of them were doing conservative talk.
Ten years later, less than 10 years later, there were 1,200 radio stations doing talk.
And at that time, the vast majority of them were AM, which everybody was saying was dead in 1988.
So now look at it.
Now you've got 1,200 stations doing talk, which means countless local talk show hosts and jobs.
You have countless national talk shows.
They have their little shows here and there and their networks here and there.
And then we've got Fox News, which sprung from the concept of talk radio, particularly Fox Primetime.
So there's been an entire expansion of the media pie.
We didn't take anything with anybody else.
We just expanded it.
And during this whole time, my audience, I'm not all these new talk shows and news stations have not taken any audience from me.
The pie, the financial pie, the little number state has grown countless thousands, hundreds of thousands of jobs, all these new revenue streams and so forth.
All started private equity with one two-hour show from noon to two on a satellite on August 1st, 1988.
And this is realville.
And at no point, folks, did anybody sit around and say that our objective here was to create jobs.
But look at what happened with the growth of the business.
Now, by the same token, nobody sat around and said we're going to save AM radio.
And nobody sat around and said we're going to have 600 stations.
And nobody sat around and said we're going to have all that just happened as a result of the growth and the business being very copycat.
Success has many fathers.
Failure is an orphan.
And even now, I am still reviled and despised In much of radio throughout my own industry.
I'm reviled and despised.
And it's all because of politics.
Snerdlies in their lab, but it's true.
You know it's true.
I don't care.
I don't.
Oh, it is.
Oh, it's not.
Well, there might be some of that, but it's a genuine revulsion.
And it's all about politics, mostly about there's some people that just don't like the level of success.
But the point is, folks, that even in the best of times, there's never unity.
There's never harmony.
There are more people in radio hoping I bomb out every day than otherwise.
It's just the nature of the beast.
It's human nature.
It's the way it is.
And here you've got Obama now trying to make everybody believe that he is the number one spending cutter, and that Romney is the biggest job killer in the campaign.
It's just absurd.
What do you mean I have to take credit for some job loss?
Well, yes, Governor Cuomo's talk show didn't work, and Gary Hart's talk show didn't work, and Jim Hightower's talk show.
I did kill some jobs.
That's true.
I did I am a job killer.
I did kill some jobs Air America.
That's true.
I have to take credit on both sides.
I did kill some jobs.
I did run some people out of the that's just the nature of the beast.
It's the way it happens.
Over the weekend was the 75th anniversary of the Golden Gate Bridge.
Now I don't know why, but the Golden Gate Bridge fascinates me.
When I lived in Sacramento, 1984 was my first time in San Francisco.
I covered the uh the Democrat convention then for a local radio station in Kansas City.
And I'd I'd never been there before.
And I one of the first places I went was to Old Fort Point, which is underneath the South Tower of the Golden Gate Bridge.
I'd watched so many movies that shoot from there.
Vertigo had a great scene, the Alfred Hitchcock movie, and I've been fascinated with the bridge.
It was built in the Depression in 1934.
Uh took four years to build it.
While they were building that bridge, they built the Bay Bridge, they built the Hoover Dam, the Empire State Building.
I mean the construction, the building that was going on in this country at that period of time was unparalleled.
That bridge, Howard is always fascinated me.
It's such a masterful design.
It looks like it is part of the creation of the earth.
It looks like it is as natural as the hills and dales on both sides of the Golden Gate.
And I went down to Old Fort Point the first time.
And every time I'm in San Francisco, I go there.
Well, I was in San Francisco last week.
I couldn't go, didn't have time.
I don't even know if you can go down there anymore after 9-11.
It was closed at one point.
I should check.
I don't even know if you can anymore.
But it's it's a beautiful spot, and every time I was in town, I would go down there, and I would stand there and say, okay, if if somebody came to me, 1934, and there's no bridge there, so we're going to build a bridge here.
I wouldn't know the first thing to do.
I wouldn't have the slightest idea.
I'm not an engineer, obviously.
So I consumed voluminously as much as I've been able to about the construction of that bridge and the engineering and the design.
And it's stunning.
Verizon Narrows Bridge Jordan.
They're all equally amazing as design feats.
But that one, it just, it's not the longest anymore.
The Verizano Narrows is longer than the Golden Gate Bridge.
But I still, to this day, marvel at it.
75th anniversary.
They've had some earthquakes.
The bridge is still there.
It's it's as in good a shape as the day it opened.
And when I lived in Sacramento, I had a chance through a highway patrol officer to actually go to the top of the South Tower.
This after I had seen there was a James Bond movie called a view to a kill.
And they had staged a fight scene on the top of the North Tower.
And that just enhanced my curiosity and overwhelming awe of this bridge.
So I was talking about how much I'd love to get up close tops when I was on the air.
And a retired or off-duty highway patrolman in California, arranged it.
So I took a day off, had my Super 8 video camcorder.
We drove down there.
We arrived at the bridge office.
They put us in a golf cart.
And we drove out the sidewalk to the door on the South Tower and got in an elevator that was so small that we had to stand to put the camera on the top of my head, and I had to stand with my arms straight up so I make room for two other people.
Tiny elevator, and we started up, and it's dark in there.
There it is, an occasional 75-watt light bulb that you pass.
And the elevator is open.
It's a platform elevator.
You can't fall out of it, but it's it's not enclosed.
You can see out, but it was dark.
The sounds going, I could hear then.
You could hear the bridge strain under the load of traffic and wind and everything.
The elevator was slow as it can be.
It was scary heading up there.
And then it doesn't take you all the way to the top, or it didn't then.
Had to climb the last 30 feet on a ladder, straight up, and you pop out of a hatch, much like in a submarine.
So one of the bridge officials went first, went up the ladder.
I was next.
He popped the hatch, walked out, and I and proof that there was a god, there wasn't a cloud in the sky that day, there wasn't any fog.
And we were up there for about, I guess, hour and a half.
I didn't want to leave.
I didn't, I didn't I didn't want to take the elevator back down.
I didn't want to climb those 30 steps on the ladder.
I mean it was a vertical straight up and down ladder.
It was not a stepladder.
Just to get back down to that elevator.
And but up there, uh they said, no, do not go to the top of the saddles.
Do not do that.
We weren't actually at the very top for all practical purposes, we were, but where the cables uh run over the tower and are anchored in the saddle.
You could go up there, but they said don't.
Vertigo will get you.
The railing is not high.
You you might lose your mouth, fall off.
Don't go up there.
Wouldn't let us go up there.
But I did lean over the edge.
Little over the edge.
I mean, if I didn't, if somebody pushed me, I'd have gone plunging off.
I leaned over the edge and pointed my Super Eight video camcorder down to the roadway and did a fast zoom to replicate what it would be if you fell off or if you jumped.
I got as many still shots uh, and I don't have them anymore.
I I don't know where the uh the this is before you could transfer this stuff to computer.
You had to watch it patched into a television set, and all the moves that I've made, uh, I don't know where the tapes are, and I never I never got them copied.
That's too bad.
I'm not organized enough for that stuff.
But I just noted that it was the 75th anniversary of the bridge uh over the weekend, and it is it is a it is a marvel to me.
I'm I'm still uh trying to find things I haven't found to read about the construction and the uh and the design.
Uh you know, only one tower is actually in the water.
The North Tower is not in the water.
You can drive under the North Tower.
When I first went to San Francisco, the guy who had hired me in Sacramento lived in San Francisco.
He said, I'm going to drive you underneath the golden bridge.
His name was Norman Wooders.
What do you mean you're going to drive me on the golden?
Just wait, I'll show you.
So we go across the bridge on the Marin side somehow take some curly Q roads end up underneath the thing.
But it's not nearly as awesome as the view from Fort Point.
They built the bridge.
They had to protect Fort Point.
It is a protected historical site, so they had to build a bridge in such a way as to protect it and build over it.
So forth.
To me, it's just um.
And I got a great picture of it here with fireworks from the 75th anniversary bash.
Just amazing thing.
And I was remembering the trip to the top.
Had to be 22 years ago now.
Shortly after the 50th anniversary of the bridge.
Waking up early.
Here's a health news, folks.
Two health news stories.
Waking up early is making us fat.
It's called Social Jet Lag.
It's a new study.
It's in Newsweek magazine.
Waking up early.
Actually, not waking up.
If you need an alarm to wake up, you are going to be obese.
That's the point of the story.
And from USA Today, a long commute time is linked to poor health.
That story, there's a purpose behind this story.
Michelle Obama is the sponsor of the Navy's first submarine with an all-female crew.
Not kidding.
Michelle Obama is the namesake, well, not the namesake.
She is sponsoring the USS Illinois, the first Navy submarine to be staffed by an all-female crew.
No seamen on board.
By the way, I should tell you something else about the EIB network.
And anybody in radio who's honest with you will confirm this.
The noon to three time slot was among the least important at any radio station.
Throwaway.
Morning drive was number one, afternoon drive number two, night time noon to three, 10 a.m. to three.
That was throwaway.
It was not important whatsoever.
So look what's happened.
At any rate, I'm not kidding about this.
Are you socially jet lagged?
The evidence that social jet lag might be a major factor driving obesity keeps mounting.
You remember that phrase, early to bed, early to rise makes a man healthy and wealthy and wise.
Whatever happened to that, now there is this social jet lag.
If you need an alarm clock to wake up, then you are socially jet lagged.
The term is coined by Till Roenberg, a chronobiologist at Ludwig Maximilians University in Munich.
It refers to what happens when your internal body clock wants you to stay asleep, but your external social clock wants you to wake up by getting up with our alarms all week and then sleeping in late on weekends.
It's like sending our body clock to the left coast and dragging it back east Monday morning.
The result is there are people who, caught in a cycle of sleep loss and oversleeping, hardly ever get a normal night's sleep at all.
So here you have it.
It's in Newsweek.
It's going to be in other places.
So how many people in a couple of weeks are going to believe this?
Social jet lag.
That's the excuse for obesity.
By the way, I don't have an alarm clock.
I don't need one.
I have a cat.
This morning, four o'clock.
A cat starts headbutting me.
I mean mean headbutting.
Hard stuff.
Little cat, eight-pound pumpkin.
And I uh I open my eyes and it's dark and I look at the clock and said, what the hell is this?
Normally, I get head butted at the first sign of light.
And that's a signal that the cat either thinks I ought to get up or wants to eat.
So what could this be?
So I panicked.
You know, I can't hear.
Is there is an alarm going?
Is something happening here?
So I bolted out of bed.
I put on my cochlear implant.
I walked all around.
Trying to figure out if listening for alarms, smelling if there was smoke, and there well, you know what it was?
I had I well, I didn't know what it was at the time, but both cat bowls were full.
And I said, Well, you know, maybe maybe the cat doesn't like us a third bag of food, so I threw out one bowl, replaced it with the third bag, and the cat started eating it.
So I got awakened at 4 a.m. with headbutts from a cat.
Say cat could eat.
And I went back to sleep, and damned if she didn't headbutt me again at first light.
So I don't need an alarm.
I have an alarm cat.
I am not making this up.
If first U.S. submarine without seamen.
Yeah, Michelle Obama, USS Illinois, all female crew, but again, we were on the cutting edge here.
Years ago, we suggested the All-American First Cavalry Amazon Battalion.
▲
Export Selection