All Episodes
Previous Next
April 12, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:49
April 12, 2012, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, this ought to be good.
The spokes kid Jay Carney now getting questions about what Hillary Rosen had to say about Ann Romney.
And I don't care what the spokes kid says.
What's going to really interest me more are the questions.
Because it's the media.
And they're going to side with Hillary Rosen.
The media is going to sign.
I guarantee you.
I mean I could be wrong about this.
Hi folks, and welcome back.
Great to have you.
Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
I got a couple of interesting emails, Mr. Snerdley during the breaks.
You know, I'm just going to read one of them.
You amaze me.
I thought the Hillary Rosen story would be worth a segment.
I had no idea there was this much involved.
That's a email from a website subscriber, Rushlinbaugh.com.
And I said, I know this is why I say it's a teachable moment.
And I thank you for the email.
There's a couple others like that too.
There we're coming.
Hey, what are you spending so much time with it?
We got it after the first two seconds.
The reason is it's such a teachable moment.
And why so much time on this?
Folks, there are reasons galore never to support these people.
Never to vote for them.
I get an opportunity like this handed to me on a silver platter to help more of you understand just who these people really are.
I'm going to take it.
I I keep saying I want to move on, and I do.
But stuff keeps rolling in here, like the Ann Romney interview in the Boston Globe in 1994, in which she talks about the economic hardships that she and Mitt went through while they were in school, $62 a month corner apartment concrete floor.
In that piece, by the way, um that same interview is this passage.
The funny thing is Ann Romney speaking.
The funny thing is I never expected help.
My father had become wealthy through hard work, as did Mitt's father, but I never expected our parents to take care of us.
They'd visit, they'd laugh and say, we can't believe you guys are living like this.
They take us out to dinner and have a good time, then they'd leave.
What you you laugh.
It was a different era back then the purpose of adults was not to take care of kids.
It was to raise them to teach them to take care of themselves.
Gosh, it's scary to think that that seems so ancient.
A philosophy.
They didn't expect help.
They didn't expect parents to buy them an apartment and so forth.
Anyway, here is CNN InfoBabes.
We have a montage here.
Well, no, it's not a montage, is it?
No, no, no.
It's a segment here.
Uh Suzanne Malvo, Snerdley's old flame, speaking with the co-anchorette Carol Costello about Hillary Rosen's remarks that Anne Romney's never worked a day in her life, and that most women in America don't have the choice that Ann Romney has.
And Costello says, keep in mind, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, only 71% of mothers either work or are looking for work.
A lot of us were talking about this in the team, and we were just saying, wouldn't it be great if you had the choice?
You know, if you didn't have to actually go out and work.
You know, everybody kind of wants that choice.
They feel like if they could stay home, a lot of people would stay home.
And if you asked Hillary Rosen, she would say, well, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
Wait, and I can't let that go.
I'm sorry, I can't let that go.
Um wait a minute.
Does that Susan Malva, does she not understand how she just cut feminism feminism off at the knees here?
Well, a lot of us were talking about this on the team, and we were just saying, wouldn't it be great if you had the choice?
You know, if you didn't have to actually go out and work, whoa.
Ho.
So, Suzanne, you are working because you have to, Not because you want to.
Your I thought feminism drove you to the workforce.
I thought having it all.
I thought working, having a family, have it having it all, that was the epitome.
I thought there was no choice.
What is this?
Wouldn't it be nice if we have the choice?
Suzanne, you do have the choice.
That's the bottom line.
These women do have the choice.
She's doing what she's doing because she's chosen to do it.
Snerdley is arguing when he's saying, no, she doesn't have the choice.
There aren't enough rich men to go around anymore.
You know what?
I'm going to debunk that too today.
Because all this stuff about the income gap widening turns out that's a bunch of hocus pocus too.
From our old buddy Jim Pethacoukas.
But who says, Snardly, you're falling into the trip.
Who says the husband has to be rich for the You know, we could spend all day here taking phone calls from women who stay at home and raise their kids or who have whose husbands are not rich.
That was Anne Romney's point in 1994.
Okay, start this up from the top.
Talking about this in the team, and we were just saying, wouldn't it be great if you had the choice?
You know, if you didn't have to actually go out and work.
You know, everybody kind of wants that choice.
They feel like if they could stay home, a lot of people would stay home.
And if you ask them, hold on.
So all of the feminists at CNN were talking in the team, and if they could stay home, they would.
Molly Yard, you hear that?
I am outreached by I wonder what Gloria Steinem thinks of this.
If we could stay home, we would.
Okay, so which Republicans' fault is it that you don't have the choice?
Which Republicans' fault is it that you have to go work now.
Hey, here's the rest of it.
I'm sorry, folks, I can't let this stuff go by without comment.
It's just who I am.
And she would say, well, that's exactly what I'm talking about.
Right.
Anne Romney doesn't have to go outside.
It's a luxury to have to be able to.
Stop the tape.
And they're see, these women are in the news business.
They haven't thought to do a Google search on Anne Romney.
Their producers and whoever's on their team haven't thought to maybe do a Nexus search, Lexus Next, maybe find this 1994 Boston Globe story, which I'm sure they wouldn't believe.
It's the Boston Globe for crying out a lot.
I mean, it's not conservative publication.
Anne Romney doesn't have to go outside and work.
She did.
But even so, that disqualifies her.
That disqualifies her from having any relatability or understanding of economic circumstances for people.
Democrats have tried this argument many times.
Like if you didn't serve in Vietnam, you have no right to talk about the defense budget.
They tried that on me.
If you haven't signed up, if you haven't joined the military, if you haven't gone and killed a bunch of commies, you have no right to talk about the defense budget.
Oh, I can't tell you how often, since the 80s I've been hit with that.
So now Ann Romney says she doesn't have to work now means she doesn't have any right to talk about or advise her husband.
See if we can get through the rest of this without my stopping it.
That's what she was saying that she didn't understand those 71% of American mothers who maybe have to work.
I don't have children, but man, I admire, I don't know the strength it takes to raise your children right.
Yeah, I can't imagine doing it all, really.
Me neither, that's why I don't have any.
I don't either.
All right, so here you have the clucking hens at CNN talking about, well, I don't have kids.
So but I can imagine Carol, you can't talk about the economy now.
Carol Costello, you are now prohibited from doing any stories on the economy.
You don't have kids.
You don't know what it's like.
Malvo, I don't did she have kids?
I don't know if Malvo has kids or not.
Well, as it was just Costello, says Sean.
That's what she was saying.
Oh, yeah, they Malvo, okay, she didn't.
Malvo said she didn't have kids either.
So neither of these women have kids, and they're in there ripping Ann Romney.
These two don't have kids, but they can do all kinds of journalism on the economy, and they can do every story in the world about what's important to women and what isn't.
But Anne Romney, who has raised five boys while fighting breast cancer and multiple sclerosis, doesn't have the right to talk about.
That's who these people are.
And I'm saying it on purpose, they don't have the right.
That's how they think.
It's not that they're not qualified.
It's not that they don't know what they're talking about.
They don't have the right.
They don't have the permission.
And since they don't have the right to talk about it, Anne Romney, she does not have the right to be listened to either.
Which of course isn't a right.
Nobody has to listen to you.
So they're circling the wagons over at CNN.
The White House is trying to push the wagon train outside the Oval Office and over at C and then they're circling the wagons into clucking hands or bragging.
I don't have kids either.
Gosh, I can imagine how hard it is.
Oh, wow.
But Ann Romney doesn't know diddly squat.
Hey, how about this Chiron Graphic on MSNBC?
GOP sensing opportunity to change narrative on women.
Ha ha ha ha ha.
Ha ha ha ha.
Hee hee hee hee hee.
How about that?
Republicans are sensing an opportunity to change the narrative on women.
I've got a question for Suzanne Malvo.
By the way, we like all these babes here.
I mean, journalists and so forth.
We play their audio sound bites, and they're they're who they are.
But I have a question, and Carol Costello is the CNN assigned stalker of this program.
I mean, that they assign a reporter to us, it's always in Carol Costello.
And they both admit it on TV today that they don't have kids.
So my question is do women without children have the right to report on stories about children.
Carol Costello and Suzanne Melvaux have no children.
So according to Hillary Rosen's stated qualification or lack of them for Anne Romney, should Suzanne Malvo and Carol Costello now not be assigned stories that have any to do with children or raising them or motherhood or anything because they can't relate.
Now I want to make one other point.
I'm I'm folks, I'm sorry, I really do keep intending to move on here, but uh this show is improv.
We don't have producers, there's no topics, nothing scripted, it uh happens, we deal with it, and I follow my passions.
And I remember over the years I've gotten a lot of trouble with the feminazis over the years.
One for coining that term.
But I always had a question about this um women and the choice to have children.
And I always posited my belief that when it comes to freedom and opportunity in the American workplace, women have much more freedom and opportunity than men do.
And always have had.
And by the way, this is also the answer to what that claim is also the reason why there is a disparity in pay between men and women.
Let me illustrate it this way.
A woman gets hired, knowing full well that she might one day get pregnant, and so the company has in place a maternity policy.
And the maternity policy.
They differ from place to place, but they anywhere from three what is to six months with some you get full pay, some half pay, some whatever, you get paid something, full benefits, and then your job back.
Now don't spoil it.
Somebody explained to me where up until recently, a guy could walk into a place and apply for employment and say, by the way, my wife has a baby.
I want six months to stay home and help her raise it.
I want full pay, I want my job when I get back.
How many men would be hired with that demand?
Answer Zilch Zero Nada.
But every woman will be hired.
Well, no, there some places will not hire if they if they suspect you're gonna get pregnant, they'll find a way.
But no man ever gets hired.
The opportunities, the flexibility that women have in the workforce is far, far greater than men, and it's because of pregnancy and motherhood and because of the value that society places on motherhood.
It's it's good thing.
And so accommodations are made for it.
Some places have daycare in the place of business.
So a new mom can bring the child in.
Uh some disagree with the doing that, but some businesses do.
To accommodate finding good people can be hard depending on what the job is.
So women have always had far more flexibility.
Now, Dawn is screaming at me that men go on maternity leave now.
What what is there an artificial womb that's been invented that I haven't heard of?
What is it the wife what what happens here?
The woman, the mother comes to work and the and the father stays home to raise.
Is that what happens?
Or they both explain them.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, okay, okay, okay.
Gay gay men.
Yeah, Dawn is saying in some companies, gay couple, a gay yeah.
Gay couple will adopt a child, in some cases an infant, and the gay employee will have okay, yeah.
That I I hadn't thought of that.
But that's that's a specific targeted group.
That doesn't apply to all men.
And the vast majority of men applying for a job with that demand are not going to be hired, and they're certainly not going to get promoted.
And I'll tell you something else about the flexibility.
A woman, at any point in her motherhood, can say, Well, you know what?
I don't want to work anyway.
I just quit.
A man does not have that flexibility, that goes on his record, and he is not going to get promoted, and he likely is not going to get hired for a significant job after he establishes a track record of being gone for months, coming back.
It just is it's it's different.
And this, by the way, also, and this has been documented here by the independent women's forum or something.
I've got two stories on this, but there's a big argument here today over the disparity in pay.
You know, we thought we had this fixed too.
We all we we thought that not fixed, but I mean significant ground had been gained, and that the differential in pay between men and women for the same work uh had decreased the differential.
And then we found out that women in the White House earn 18% less than the men who work in the White House.
Well, so here you have the Mecca of liberalism, the Mecca of socialism.
Where there is, at least when they control things, they're gonna have their utopia.
Everything is going to be perfect.
Everybody's gonna be treated the same, everybody's gonna be treated fairly, everybody, nobody's gonna be discriminated against.
You would think the White House would be that utopian.
You've got the head utopian Obama, and he's got total power, and everybody he hires is also a utopianist, and everybody in there believes you would think, therefore, that the workplace in the White House would be the model.
Ah, that's where everybody should look to find out how to do it.
Wouldn't you expect that?
In fact, wouldn't you, folks, where liberalism is the vast majority of the power, and it's not really opposed, wouldn't you think that every liberal city, every liberal town, every liberal club would be its own mini utopia?
Wouldn't you think I mean the things they're trying to force on us, wouldn't they have already implemented for themselves?
So therefore, wouldn't the White House workplace be ideal?
Wouldn't the White House be the utopia that we all should have where there is equal pay for equal work and everybody gets paid a lot and everybody gets the same benefits and everybody is respected and nobody's laughed at, nobody's made fun of, and nobody's bullied.
And there's no disparity in pay between men and women, and there's no discrimination between the races, the genders, the orientations, what have none, right?
Isn't that something we should all expect?
Who can tell Obama that he can't do that in the White House?
Who can tell if if the president of the United States, this utopia that he and liberals believe shouldn't it exist in a place that's under his and his wife's direct control?
It should because it's the best, right?
I mean, that what they believe in and the lifestyles and circumstances that they believe for us, they should set up for themselves.
So why is it that women make 18% less in Obama's utopian oval office than the men do?
Why?
Must be discrimination.
Nope, there's another answer to it.
You know what the answer is?
Motherhood.
Men work longer hours.
No, no, I've got it right here in a stack of stuff.
This actually is not my theory.
This is so women work longer hours and they have a flexibility, or men work longer hours, and women can leave the job whenever they want and come back whenever they want, when the child is involved, and as such, they earn less than men.
That's the theory in here.
I'll find it.
We'll get phone calls, too, when we come back.
Welcome back, my friends.
L Rush Mose serving humanity.
You know, people are starting to call me L for short now.
E L. Dear L. I kind of like it.
All right, here it is.
You know, uh it's it's it's really fascinating.
I I I've had what what I consider to be an epic broadcast so far today.
With um information, facts, illustrations, uh just un not going to be heard anywhere else.
And Snerdly is totally uninterested.
He and Dawn are in there yakking about the family medical leave act.
He keeps, what about Zimmerman?
What about Zimmerman?
We're gonna get to Zimmerman.
But here is this here's this piece.
Suzanne Vinker, V-E-N-K-E-R, Suzanne Vinker, co-author of a book coming a year from now, February 213, the name of her book, The Flip Side of Feminism, What Conservative Women Know and Men Can't Say.
Suzanne Vencker, flip side of feminism, what conservative women know and men can't say.
Oh, that book's already out.
I'm sorry.
Her new book will be published in a year called How to Choose a Husband.
And here's a she has a she has an open letter to President Obama that was published, and here's the here's the pull quote.
The bottom line is that the pay gap exists because of a voluntary division of labor, not discrimination by a conspiracy of male chauvinists.
Men simply work more hours than women, and people who work more hours or work at more difficult, unpleasant, or riskier jobs earn more, and they should.
You're wasting valuable time and money, Mr. President.
There will never be male female pay parity so long as most women spend part of their lives caring for their children.
And thank God they do.
And I'll tell you, government needs to keep out of it.
Obama wants to make this issue.
His own White House is full of lower paid women.
And by the way, we got the photos to establish that his campaign staff doesn't look like America.
His campaign staff, I'd send a stack from earlier this week.
You know, I I don't use pictures here because it's radio.
I can show it a ditto cam, but there's a picture of the Obama re-elect team.
It's all white.
It is like eighty people.
Now, if the Messiah, if the one cannot bring about pay equity in his own office, why should anybody else be forced to do it?
This is my point.
These are the utopians.
Obama has the power to put together his utopia right in the White House.
No bullying, no discrimination, equal pay, whatever the issues are.
And yet all this disparity exists.
And there's probably bullying that goes on in there.
And he's probably one of the biggest bullies in there as the boss.
But his campaign staff doesn't look like America.
And nobody on that campaign staff, for example, looks like Al Sharpton.
That uh that I could see.
It's almost it's almost totally white.
The first question to the spokes kid, Jay Carney today was about Hillary Rosen.
And Carney said he hadn't spoken to the one.
Uh and spoken to Obama about Rosen's comments, but uh Carney said, we can all agree raising children is an extremely difficult job.
Uh Jay Carney also said he wasn't sure how many times Hillary Rosen's been to the White House because he personally knows three people named Hillary Rosen.
So, yes, there's a Hillary Rosen was in there 35 times, but you know, it could have been different Hillary Rosen.
That's what he said.
Okay, I want to go to the phones.
We've got our leukemia lymphoma society Curathon tomorrow, too.
We're gonna be using Twitter for that.
I want to tell you about that.
Um before the program uh uh wraps for today.
Here is Judy in Westport, Connecticut.
I really appreciate you holding on.
Thank you.
Oh, thank you.
Um when I got up this morning and I saw this story and knew I had to call you.
I've um tried to get through to you four times since I've been listening to you over the years.
This is the first time I got through.
What I told Mr. Snerdley was that uh I think I took the easy way out.
I went to work.
I think that um Ann Romney had the tougher job.
I can't imagine staying home and raising five kids.
Um absolutely in awe of her.
With MS and breast cancer along the way.
Just amazing, but I've got to tell you, I'm basically your age.
And so I went through the whole you can have it all.
I bought into that.
Well, yeah, and interesting, what did that mean?
You tell me you're you're my age, so you you you come from the uh the formative years would be the modern era feminism in the late 60s, early 70s.
What to you did having it all mean?
Didn't it mean a great job with great pay and motherhood and going with the kids to soccer and doing all isn't that what it meant?
Oh, that's what you were supposed to do.
That's what you were expected to do.
And if you didn't do the work half, you were betraying the sisterhood, right?
Well, it was just it was what we were expected to do.
I mean, I wasn't I'm an attorney, so I went through law school.
I was expected to go practice law.
By who?
Who had these expectations of you?
Generally that's what society expected.
No, that's what the feminists told you.
That's what yeah.
But when I think back, I mean, having it all when you do that, when you're at work, you always think you're supposed to be home, and when you're home, you always think you're supposed to be at work.
It's it's very hard.
It's a cycle, isn't it?
It's as vicious as the full engelata.
Yeah, it was very rough, and when I think back, you know, I could have taken a break at that point in time.
Did you get married?
Well, I was married for ten years before my son was born.
Typical for my generation, we waited till the last possible minute to have kids.
Right.
And you did that because the biological time bomb was about to go off, right?
Right.
It was I know the story, folks.
I know this story without knowing the woman.
I know the story.
So you delayed it, the biological time bomb, and and uh I know so many women who bought into this and they waited and waited, and it got to be too late.
And now I can't tell you how unfulfilled they are where they don't have kids.
Well, I'm so happy that uh I made it before the biological time bomb went off.
But I think at that point I could have taken a career pause, but I didn't.
I was just starting up my own law practice.
Well, were you serious about the regret?
You you at the regrets you said at the beginning of the call, you you would have chosen if knowing what you know now, you would have uh you would have chosen the Ann Romney path.
Oh no, that's not.
You said you took the easy way.
You I took the easy way out.
I got to go to work.
So I got to be around adults all day.
I got to have adult conversations.
I mean, she being in the house with small children and not having adult contact all day.
That's hard.
Yeah.
That's a difficult job.
Yeah.
I know what you mean.
I can relate to that, my three dogs.
Well, I got to scoot out all day.
And come home in the evening.
I mean, I spent as much time as I could, but I worked for myself, so I was able to I still do.
So as able to come and go as I wanted to.
Well, I'm glad you called.
I appreciate your your uh your perspective on this.
Uh did the did the Hillary Rosen thing irritate you?
Is that why you wanted a call?
I woke up this morning and I looked at Drudge, and that was the first thing that I saw, and I said, I don't care how much time it takes, I gotta call Rush.
Well, I'm glad you did.
I'm glad I had my automatic phone redialer.
Well, the connections work this Judy, thanks for the call.
I really appreciate it.
Thank you.
All the best to you.
All right, before we go to the break here, folks, tomorrow is the annual cure-a-thon here on the Rush Limbaugh program to cure the blood cancers, leukemia and lymphoma.
We do this in conjunction with the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America.
We've been at this, I guess it's 19 uh 89.
Uh uh and we have since then uh total combined donations, I think it's w over th what it's either 30 or 36.
It's 26 or 20 or f it's it's it's thirty million dollars or more.
Uh and it it and we've never had a down year.
Every year no matter what the economic circumstances are, we've always had up years.
It's blown us all away here.
Uh during this particular recession.
What we we continue to beat previous years' expectations.
This is not a challenge.
I'm not throwing out a challenge, I'm simply telling you how uh appreciative everybody is and how surprised we have been during a couple of these because the uh Curathon took place during a uh severe economic downturn.
Uh what we're gonna do, uh we're we're going to add uh Twitter for the first time this year in our leukemia lymphoma society Curathon.
We're gonna put a hashtag.
We're going to use a hashtag.
The hashtag is the number sign rush LLS Radio Thon.
That's the hashtag, rush the number sign rush LLS Radio Thon.
And when you retweet that, you are helping to build awareness that will uh lead to more donations.
It'll alert people not listening to the radio program as to what's going on here and bring them here and understand what we're doing.
Because uh this disease has touched a lot of people that that we know personally here.
And when you are every year, for example, I have new facts to report to you on uh survivability rates, which are increasing after being diagnosed with a certain kind of uh blood cancer, the survivability rate can be anywhere from three to five to ten years now.
That's much longer than it used to be.
Regardless what the number is, it's...
when you when you finally meet somebody that's dealt with this or dealing with it, you find out what that really means.
What is a three-year survivability rate mean?
As you might have young kids and you've got a diagnosis where the uh the averages are three year survivability.
What do you use those three years for?
What uh or five or ten?
And it's um profoundly important aspect of the research being done to increase the survivability rights upon diagnos uh uh uh uh rates upon diagnosis.
And that's one of the things that we're gonna be talking about tomorrow in uh in context here.
So we can't wait for we do it each and every year.
It's a um it's a real upper of a day.
And uh adding this uh the the Twitter hashtag to it is uh going to enable us to attract attention from even more people who might want to help out here.
So that's all coming up tomorrow.
We'll start it as always.
We don't broom the whole program, we do the radio curaton along with the radio show at the same time.
Be right back after this.
Hillary Rosen has apologized to Anne Romney.
I do not have the text of the apology in front of me.
But she has apologized.
It's uh somewhat lengthy apology, in which she apologizes to Ann Romney, anybody else that she offended, and then she says it's time to declare peace on this phony war.
Time to declare peace on this phony war.
Phony war?
That's obviously a reference to the war on women.
Well, whose phony war on women is it?
Who started it?
White House.
In conjunction with George Stephanopoulos at ABC News and a question of Mitt Romney on January 7th at a Republican debate in Manchester, New Hampshire.
By the way, uh ladies and gentlemen, Bright Bart.
Obama lays groundwork for Rosen's attack on Anne Romney.
The Obama campaign would have us believe that last night on CNN, Obama advisor and frequent guest, Hillary Rosen, spoke out of turn with her indefensible attack on Ann Romney and every woman who chooses to stay home and raise her family, but but in a speech last Friday at the White House Forum on women and the economy, Obama seemed to be laying the groundwork for exactly this attack.
By last Friday, it was already apparent that the only thing stopping Romney from becoming the Republican nominee were mere formalities.
Talk had already begun among uh Obama's media allies that Anne Romney was going to be a huge asset for the Republican ticket.
Attractive, charismatic, warm, well-spoken, intelligent, well-mannered, likable on site, she would do much to not only soften Mitt's edges, but also to help shore up the so-called gender gap, as we've all seen.
Since Obama stabbed the Catholic Church in the back a couple months ago, Obama is cynically plotting a path to re-election through a phony war on women because he can't run on a failed record.
When that's your sinister plot, a woman like Anne Romney's a serious problem.
So last night on CNN, Hillary Rosen attacked Ms. Romney, but almost immediately afterward, the regime assured us that Rosen doesn't speak for him.
It's baloney.
Obama might not be all that hot as president, but when it comes to campaigning and message discipline, this White House knows what it is doing, and it doesn't hurt to have the media carrying your water either.
Speaking of his own wife Muchell, just a few days prior to Rosen's attack, Obama launched a little theme that should sound familiar after last night's fireworks.
And once Michelle and I had our girls, she gave it her all to balance raising a family, pursuing a career, something that could be very difficult on her because I was gonna be gone a lot, and I was in the state legislature, and I was teaching, and I was practicing law, and I'd be traveling, Obama said, and we didn't have the luxury for her not to work.
Oh boo hoo for the Harvard graduates.
Here's Michelle with a no-show job of 300 grand at some Chicago hospital.
When Barack was earning a hundred some odd grand in the State House.
So the theory from Breitbart is that Obama himself laid the groundwork for Hillary Rosen's attack last night.
Oh yeah, when I was a state legislature, I was teaching, I was working, I was traveling.
We didn't have the luxury for her not to work.
That was last Friday in the forum on women.
And by the way, this attack on Ann Romney last didn't come out of the blue.
CNN set it up.
In other words, another news, folks, very quickly here, George Zimmerman appeared for his arraignment just a few minutes ago.
Did you notice, Snerdley can't wait for me to talk about Zimmerman?
So I'll ask you, did you notice Zimmerman actually turned himself in?
I have to say, so far at least Zimmerman seems to be the most cooperative, racist, profiling, trigger happy, rumble wannabe hothead I have ever heard about.
Folks, have you noticed that George Zimmerman, I mean I'm sorry, I just I'm an I'm an observer of things.
You notice that George Zimmerman looks a lot less white Hispanic in his mug shut, and he looks a lot less white Hispanic standing next to his lawyer and next to the African American police officer.
You notice that?
▲
Export Selection