All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:41
February 27, 2012, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Let me ask you a quick question, folks.
I checked the email during the break.
I'm not surprised.
Still got a lot of people out there who are scared to death about the social issues.
A couple emails.
You know, Rush, you are killing the Republican Party.
Your insistence on talking about this.
You should be steering people away from it.
If the Republican Party is dying, I have nothing to do with it.
I don't run them.
And I let me just pose a question.
If you're if you're nervous about the social issues being discussed.
And the polling data, by the way, does not show that it's hurting.
Let me just ask you a question.
Present a hypothetical for you.
If Obama be honest about this.
Barack Obama and Rick Santorum have a debate on faith and the Constitution.
Who do you think most Americans would agree with?
Do you think most Americans would agree with Obama on faith and the Constitution?
Do you think most people would agree that Barack Obama, if he said so?
Would agree that he's got the authority to mandate that anybody provide anybody else contraception or birth control or what have you, or make them get abortion, whatever it is in violation of the First Amendment?
Who do you think would win that debate?
I don't think it would be even close.
Look at what Obama would have to defend.
Obama would have to defend infanticide and partial birth abortion.
Do you think he would?
Those two things are indefensible.
You have you have a debate over this kind of stuff, and there's no way any Democrat wins this debate.
Let Obama make the case in a debate for infanticide.
Let him make the case for what he proposed in legislation and voted for.
You have an abortion, it doesn't go right.
Which means the baby survives.
So a third doctor, a second doctor is called in to finish the job.
Because the original intent of the mother was to abort the baby.
The doctor, the original doctor blew it, so bring in another doctor.
Third party, if you will, finished the job.
I think Obama's going to win that debate supporting infanticide as it is described.
Partial birth abortion.
Do you think Obama would win that?
Obama would have to defend same-sex marriage.
No, Mr. Lumbo, Mr. Lumbo, you're a terribly the President Obama has said.
No, he wants both sides of this issue.
But everybody would when everybody knows that Obama is for same-sex marriage.
Everybody knows it, even his supporters know it.
They wink at him.
Obama would have to defend the exclusion of the Christmas tree from the public square.
If he if he didn't do all of these things in a debate, his own side would be fit to be tied.
The problem that I'm trying to get to, the problem is not that the subject has come up.
The problem is dealing with it properly.
The media and the left are bigots about this stuff.
All we're saying is don't run from it.
They bring it up okay.
Don't cower in fear.
Don't be afraid of it.
Just take it right back to them.
Anyway, welcome back.
Rush Linbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
By the way, in the Wall Street Journal today, you know what?
There's a um there's an op-ed by Rick Santorum.
And you know what's it about?
It's about his economic plans.
That's right.
That's right.
Santorum has an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal today about his economic plans.
Have you seen any coverage of this?
You haven't?
You haven't seen him talk about this on PMSNBC?
Have you seen him talk about it, Fox?
Have you seen him talk about it on CBS, NBC, ABC, New York Times, Washington Post?
I didn't think so.
Well, no, it just came out today.
Meet the press couldn't have talked about it because it runs, it runs today.
Oh, wait a minute, ran last frightening.
Now you're you may have a point.
I'm not sure when it ran.
But the point is it isn't being discussed.
he's got an op-ed on economic plans.
I think it runs this morning.
Now, who who banned prayer in the public school and when did that happen?
Who started the war on religion in the public sector?
Who started all this?
Who are the real bigots?
Who are the people trying to deny people religious freedom?
Let this come up in a debate.
Let it come up.
I don't know why people have to be afraid of it.
I know that I, Il Rushbo am not.
I want to move.
I want to know what's going on in Afghanistan at Bagram Air Force Base or Air Base.
This is the story where Muslim prisoners were using books, uh, occasionally Qurans to pass messages to one another.
Incendiary messages.
They were using books in the jail to pass message to each other.
Some of the books were the Quran.
Nobody knew this because they were not printed in English.
When it was discovered, the books were taken away.
The people that took the books away are not the people who discovered the books.
The soldiers that took the books away and burned them didn't know they were burning Qurans.
They just were told to dispatch the stuff.
On schedule and on cue, massive protests erupted all over Kabul, and Americans were shot, and then Obama apologized to our puppet, well, our former puppet over there, Hamid Karzai, who was the president of Afghanistan.
Obama apologized.
And now if you haven't heard this, a Muslim group somewhere might be in Kabul, in in Afghanistan.
A Muslim group has demanded that the soldiers who took the garbage out and burned it now be put on trial and prosecuted.
Ah, NATO has agreed to the prosecution.
So the soldiers, the Americans, who burned the garbage, who did not know that the Quran was, and by the way, the Muslims prisoners themselves defaced the Quran by writing messages to each other in these books.
It was discovered, they were taken away and burned.
So now these guys are going to be prosecuted as everybody scared to death and bending over backwards, not to offend.
And it's gotten to the point where why are we there?
If this is the end result of us being there, let's get these people out, bring them home into hell with the place over there.
We're going over there for a host of reasons.
I've been there.
I was, it was many years ago, and there was, excuse me, there was a variation of nation building going on.
We're building schools.
And we were building especially schools for women.
We were doing everything we could.
This is during the Bush years that I was there, but they were doing everything they could to help women in Afghanistan get out from the prisons they lived in in just terms of everyday life.
We're building roads and this kind of thing.
But at the same time, we're also there for our own national security.
We're trying Al Qaeda was able to take over the place because it was a stateless place.
There was no leadership after the war between the Russians and the Afghanistan, it was a revolution and it was a stateless place, and that's made to order for a terrorist group when in the Taliban took over.
So we're trying to prevent that from happening.
A lot of good things we're trying to do.
But Obama has botched it left and right by announcing withdrawal dates and pull-out dates and this kind of thing.
If our soldiers are going to be prosecuted for doing their jobs, and if NATO and the rest of these people are just going to bend over and grab the ankles, what is the Point, folks.
For me, it's a simple case of being fed up and tired with the assumption that it's the United States that's guilty by virtue of its presence.
Obama doesn't help this along by apologizing left and right over and over.
Like Victor Davis Hanson points out a national review.
Look, an apology may be one time if it done right in the right place, the right time and the right tone and tenor might have an impact.
But when you just do it again and again and again, all you eventually say about yourself is that you're a weakling joke.
And that's what Obama's doing.
I think it's just absurd.
And now Mrs. Clinton's got in uh gotten involved in this, of course, as the as the Secretary of State.
She is upset that there is criticism of Obama for apologizing.
Yesterday morning on State of the Union on CNN.
Elise Labitt interviewed Hillary Clinton, and she said President Obama's apology has been very controversial.
I mean, obviously Newt Gingrich and others have made this apology part of a campaign, but other experts in Afghanistan are saying this apology sends a wrong message.
It gives the Taliban the excuse to go against us to help us to help use our enemies against us, and also a lot of these attacks that are happening against Americans seem to be in retaliation for something the U.S. is taking responsibility for the burning of the Qurans.
What do you say to that, Mrs. Clinton?
Well, I find it, you know, somewhat uh troubling that uh our politics uh would inflame such a dangerous situation in Afghanistan.
I well remember during the eight years of President Bush's administration when something happened that was regrettable, unintentional, as this incident was.
President Bush was quick to say, look, you know, we're sorry about this.
This is something that, you know, we obviously did not mean to do.
That's all that President Obama was doing.
What uh how can she say that with a straight face?
Bush?
What of what what what what did I miss?
Bush apologized all over the place for things like this when they happened.
But more than that, more than that, Mrs. Clinton says, I find it somewhat troubling that our politics would inflame such a dangerous situation.
Really, Mrs. Clinton?
You find it a shame that our politics would inflame such a how about when Michael Isakoff ran the false story that Qurans are being flushed down the toilet at Club Gitmo.
What about when you guys were calling David Petraeus a liar before he even testified?
And move on.org ran that ad the New York Times called Betrayus.
What about Harry Reid?
This war is lost.
What about all of the efforts?
John Kerry, John Murpha agreeing with false allegations that the Marines in Hadith had committed rape, murder in Mayhem against women.
And it acted like terrorists, John Kerry said.
You you you you are troubled that our politics would inflame such a dangerous situation, and this kind of thing didn't happen when Bush was president.
How about Mrs. Clinton himself herself undermining the war in Iraq?
Let's go back.
From her website, it's a video, February 18, 2007.
Hillary held a hill cast where she described her plan to stop Bush's escalation, laid out a roadmap for the end of the war in Iraq.
Now it's time to say the redeployment should start in 90 days, or the Congress will revoke authorization for this war.
Oh, it's somewhat troubling.
Our politics would inflame such a dangerous situation.
September 11, 2007, in Washington, Capitol Hill.
This was during a Senate foreign relations committee hearing about the status of the war in Iraq.
Petraeus was testifying, and Mrs. Clinton during the QA.
You have been made the de facto spokesman for what many of us believe to be a failed policy.
Oh, no.
Despite what I view as your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony, both yesterday and today, uh, I think that um the reports that you provide to us really require the willing suspension of disbelief.
Whoa, so Mrs. Clinton is basically saying the war is lost too.
It's a failed policy.
This is very troubling that our politics would inflame such a dangerous situation in Iraq.
Because she was on CNN yesterday.
She's very upset that our politics would inflame this situation with the Quran's being burned in Afghanistan.
Oh, it's horrible.
It never happened.
Bush did the same thing Obama did.
He apologized left and right.
April 28, 2003, Hartford, Connecticut, the annual Jefferson Jackson Bailey dinner.
Here's Mrs. Clinton.
I am sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and you disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic, and we should stand up and say we are Americans and we have a right to debate and disagree with that administration.
And people ask why the divorce rate in America is so high.
But that's Mrs. Clinton.
What a terrible, terrible thing.
Our politics would inflame such a dangerous situation in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Well, it's just that's just it's so horrible, isn't it?
Mrs. Clinton can't believe that people would politicize this.
And let's go to Dick Turbin.
He was on Morning Joe this morning on MSNBC.
And the guest panelist was Anriam Mitchell, NBC News and Washington.
She had an aspirin between her knees.
She said, What about those events like Afghanistan?
Gasoline prices, global events over which the President has so little control.
Did Andrea Mitchell ever make that observation about George W. Bush?
Worldwide events of the president had so little control.
So she continues her question at Turban.
gasoline prices.
Doesn't President Obama have a lot of challenges going ahead, going forward as the commander-in-chief, as the incumbent looking Look at the three Republican candidates scurrying to go to these talk shows on Sunday to try to say, well, we're really going to broaden this battle.
the inflammatory rhetoric from Newt Gingrich, which just continues on a regular basis.
President Obama is showing leadership at a time when people want it.
He is trying to calm a dangerous situation when we have American troops whose lives are at stake.
That is what a leader does in foreign policy.
Doesn't run off and inflame the situation in the hopes of winning a few points back home.
Really?
Really?
Um Obama's showing leadership when people want it.
Calm a dangerous situation.
We have troops whose lives are at stake.
This Gingrich guy, all this inflammatory rhetoric, Dick Turbons what seems to me, if we go back to June 10th of 2005, seems to me we got somebody who's a perp.
You're guilty of this.
We found somebody who's done exactly what Durbin says shouldn't be done.
We've we found a soundbite of somebody in 2005 doing exactly what Dick Durbin's speaking out against this morning.
If I read this to you and didn't tell you that it was an FBI agent describing what Americans had done to prisoners in their control, you would most certainly believe this must have happened by Nazis, Soviets in their gulags.
Whoa.
Or some mad regime, Paul Potter, others.
Whoa.
No concern for human beings.
Whoa.
Sadly.
No.
That's not the case.
No, it's not.
This was the action of Americans in treatment of their own prisoners.
I have to take a break, but the hypocrisy here is just glaring.
Politicizing.
In flaming, criticizing these Democrats clean and pure as the wind-driven snow.
They are the pumps.
They start this stuff.
And back to the phones we go.
Nice to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Rush, it's great to talk to you.
Uh, even though we've never met, you're an old dear friend of mine.
Thank you, sir very much.
Um if you will allow me, I know you've been covering a lot of topics, but I'd like to go back to Al active valor, if we could.
Sure.
Uh I'd like to echo everything that you said.
Uh after the movie was over, after I sat there and stunned silence.
Uh I gave it a standing ovation along with everybody else in the theater.
Uh And then I went out and I was sitting on my truck for ten minutes with tears streaming down my face.
And uh then I went to Facebook, posted out all over.
I was texting all my friends, you gotta go see this movie.
Because I'm sure that you you you noticed uh you could tell that the SEALs were not real actors when you saw real actors on the screen.
You could tell the SEALs were did that did that take away from the movie any at all for you?
No, you know it's funny you mentioned that because uh being former military, I'm always hesitant to see a movie uh uh coming out of Hollywood about military, and so I always go and look at the reviews, and there was there was negative reviews.
Uh, and one of them mentioned that you know they're not actors, they should stick to what they know.
But uh it they did a great job as far as I concern.
I mean, could you could tell that they're not professional actors, but for me, that's a great thing.
I had this I love to see real people.
Catherine and I had this.
I love that fact that these guys were real, and that's why I went to see it.
I went to go see it because I heard your review last week.
Well, we had this we had the same reaction to it.
Um it's obvious that they're that they're not trained actors, but it adds to it.
It adds to the realism of it all.
Some of the I mean, there are stunt people in this movie, but all the exercises performed are actual exercises and tactics that SEALs are trained to do and perform in Canada.
And I've never seen half of them.
There's no action adventure movie.
I mean, they do impossible things in in like mission.
This is real stuff that I have never seen done before.
I really, you know, I had a DVD to watch when I could rewind it.
You're gonna wish you could do that if you see it in a theater.
I want to say one more thing about the movie Act of Valor, and I'm gonna shut it down because I don't want to build the expectations up so high that they can't be met.
That happened to me with the exorcist.
I was one of the last people to see The Exorcist.
And by then I'd heard it was the most horrifying, scary uh gory movie ever.
So I was really expecting this over-the-top thing.
When I finally saw it, when it was over, I said, what was the big deal?
So I don't want that to happen to you if you go see Act of Valor after I after I discuss it.
But I I I do have to tell you that they they shot this on a $3,000 camera, and it is the most beautiful movie I've ever seen in the from the stand.
I'm not a professional reviewer of movies, so when I say cinematographer, I'm just talking cinematography.
I'm just talking about every frame looks.
I was lucky the print that I got, the the copy I got on my DVD was it was almost like Blu-ray.
So it wasn't, but it was it was that good.
I'm telling you some of the shots, some of the places they put cameras, some of the action that they got, I've never seen in any movie where they stage these kinds of events and come up with impossible things that human beings cannot do in movies.
This consists of everything seals do and can do and are trained to do.
But I was just overwhelmed by it.
We we we had the the flexibility of hitting the pause button now and then rewinding to look at something again, which I'm telling you, you're going to wish you could do.
That's as much as I'm gonna say about it, because any more would be uh would be overkill.
Other things going on in the news, this from the hill.com.
Look at this headline.
Democrat governors discuss bypassing Congress with Obama.
President Barack Hussein Obama met with a group of Democrat governors on Friday, and they discussed plans to work around Congress toward policy goals.
Governor Jack Markle, or Mark L. Not sure how he pronounces it, the Democrat governor of Delaware, the vice chairman of the National Governor's Association told the Hill at the meeting was very good, said that many of the governors were responsive to ideas about bypassing Congress.
Now, this doesn't mean legal bypassing Congress.
This means autocratically bypassing Congress.
Markle said there was a sense that none of us should wait.
We can't wait for things to happen in Congress.
We're gonna do what we can do now.
Now, if you think that this is anything, remember the old governor of North Carolina that's quitting.
What was it in Dumplin?
Bev Purdue suspend suggested suspending the 2012 congressional elections.
Let's just not have them so that the members of Congress won't have to worry about raising funds and running for re-election, and so they won't have to worry about voting against their own interest.
And when there was an outcry, she said, I'm just kidding.
Come on, lighten up.
So everybody went back to the audio tape and listened to it again, and she wasn't kidding.
And now, as a result of that and some other things, Beverly Purdue has said she's not running for governor, not running for re-election, which apparently the regime didn't know.
She didn't clear it with them.
The Democrat conventions in North Carolina.
And she's announced she's not running for re-election.
And the regime is is livid.
And so apparently the White House is sending streams of people into North Carolina afraid of losing it in 2012.
They're actually afraid of losing it.
So as an aside to you people of North Carolina, you got traffic jams from now till December.
Yeah, you're not going to be able to look anywhere without noticing some interlopers from the Democrat Party in there trying to save the state for themselves.
So anyway, she suggests canceling Congressional elections.
Now these guys say, okay, we can't do that.
Let's just pretend they're not there.
Let's just govern without them.
And that's what Obama and the Democrat governors got together to discuss.
Obama has positioned himself against Congress as he's running for re-election.
He's arguing that lawmakers are failing to solve a country's problems.
Where Congress won't act, I will, he said back in October.
The Delaware governor said that the conversation with Obama did not dwell on Republican opposition.
He said the tone of the meeting was positive, and the governors agreed Obama has been terrifically responsive to their state governments.
So the Democrat governors discussed three major job goals.
Building manufacturing, training workers, and increasing American-made energy.
We had a we had a great conversation on that.
Very focused, surprisingly, not surprisingly, on jobs, though.
The biggest issue for all of us in that room, no matter where we came from, was jobs.
He said the discussion with Obama steered clear of transportation bills and all that.
They're not even talking about legislation.
They're talking about how they can just rule, not govern.
That's what the meeting was.
How can they get this stuff done in an election year over the heads of Congress?
Health care news from the Washington Post.
The per person cost of federal high-risk medical insurance plan has doubled.
This is, do you know what high-risk medical plan is?
Do you know what that is?
That is the pre existing condition.
This is what's in the Obamacare that even some Republicans, you know, what a lot of people like this pre existing condition stuff.
We gotta we can't overturn the whole thing.
Well, it's not good news, folks.
Medical costs for enrollees in the health care law's high-risk insurance pools, that's for preexisting conditions, are expected to more than be double the initial predictions.
The Obama regime admitted this itself in a report last Thursday at the end of the day.
The health care law set aside five billion dollars for a preexisting condition insurance plan meant to provide health insurance to those who had been declined coverage By private carriers.
Since its launch last summer, nearly 50,000 Americans have enrolled in the program.
It'll phase out in 2014 when insurers will be required to accept everybody, regardless of their health care status.
And I'm here to tell you that once they have to accept everybody, it's no longer insurance.
It is a welfare plan.
And that is by design.
That one fact will close down private sector health insurance.
Just shut it down.
Now you know this.
We told you all of this throughout the debate on the health pill.
You may have forgotten it, but you know this.
You know that in 2014, this this high risk thing is just an interim plan right now until 2014 after Obama's been re-elected and firmly into his last term and no accountability.
Private sector health insurance companies will be required to accept all applicants regardless of their health care status.
And again, folks, when that happens, insurance companies are no longer insurance companies.
They are simply agents of mandated federal welfare.
And they will go out of business.
By design, this is what the Democrats want.
They want private sector insurance companies who are hated, by the way.
The regime.
The Democrats have spent years ginning up hatred for every private sector industry they can except education.
But drugs, pharmaceuticals, oil, retail, you name it, they're hated and despised.
They kill their customers, they gouge their customers.
They don't care about their customers.
And so when the private sector insurance companies refuse to do business, Obama says, see, I told you you can never stress them for the first.
They don't care about you, and they never didn't care about you.
Since we have finally made it clear to them they can't uh uh make an obscene profit off of you.
Well, then they've decided to close.
Well, that's okay, because we'll be here and we'll we'll provide you insurance.
And that's exactly what's headed our way.
Private sector insurance mandated to cover everybody.
Private sector.
Yeah, right.
Exactly.
Premiums are gonna go down 20,500 premiums are gonna drop.
Premiums are gonna drop $2,500 in this interim program.
Guess what?
50,000 people have signed up, and the premiums have doubled.
Ah, I should say they have risen to double the initial projections.
Now, the initial projections were low balled.
We'll have to admit this in order to falsify the total cost is under a trillion dollars to get that magic number so it would pass.
But nevertheless, a question that I always have.
The government botches everything it tries like this, and yet way too many Americans still think the government ought to do this, although in health care the numbers are not that anymore.
Health care of the more and more Americans are suggesting the government should have nothing to do with it.
So here are the details.
Those who have enrolled in the program are projected to have higher medical costs than the government initially expected.
Each participant in the pre-existing condition insurance plan is expected to average $29,000 in medical costs in 2012, this year.
According to the report, that's more than double what government contracted actuaries predicted in November of 2010.
Back then, the analysts said that the program would cost $13,000 per enrollee.
Now it's $29,000.
It's more than doubled from the initial projection of what it costs.
Can you say debt?
Can you say deficit?
Can you say national debt?
The costs are significantly higher also than those of similar high-risk pools that many states have operated for decades.
In other words, states have the same high-risk pools for pre-existing conditions, and their prices have not gone up like the federal government's has.
States spend an average of twelve thousand four hundred and seventy-one dollars per patient.
That was in two thousand eight.
So there you have it.
Pre-existing condition costs doubled.
That's okay, Mr. Labor.
It doesn't matter because it's free.
It's free to the patron.
No, Mr. New Castrati, it isn't free.
Nothing is free.
Not even your condom or your abortion pill.
Nothing is free.
The continually shrinking percentage of people who pay for everything are going to be paying for that.
And here's this USA Today Gallup poll again.
A poll of the nation's twelve top battleground states, a clear majority of registered voters call the passage of Obamacare a bad thing and support its repeal if a Republican wins the White House in November.
Two years after Obama signed it, the president has failed to convince most Americans it was the right thing to do.
Well, that's a hell of a time.
How about maybe trying to convince them before they vote on it?
Which wasn't allowed.
So Obama totally out of touch with the American.
Doesn't care.
Governing against the will of the people.
Battleground state.
Battleground states.
That means up for grabs in the 2012 presidential election.
It's a bad thing.
Obamacare is a bad thing.
We'll be back.
Don't go away.
No, I don't know.
I don't know.
It doesn't say.
That's that's it's and because of that, it's got to be pretty big.
Snerdley wants to know if this U.SA.
Today Gallup poll gives a number to the number of people that oppose in the battleground states that oppose the passage of Obama.
It doesn't say.
It says a clear majority.
Now, we got another poll that says 75%.
I'm telling you, you don't see 75% on anything, agreement on anything.
This number must be pretty bad for them not to publish it.
It's gotta be this clear majority's gotta be well up there for USA Today not to put the number in the story.
Now, the number of people in the clear majority who oppose the passage of Obamacare in the battleground states, that's the polling date.
Now the poll also says that uh the Obamacare mandate is making independence turn against Obama.
Yes, indeed.
Among independents who lean to the GOP, 54% say they are much less likely to support Obama as a result of the Obamacare mandate.
75% nationwide oppose this.
In the battleground states, we don't know what the number is.
They're not using the number of battlegrounds, 75% nationwide.
In the battleground states, it's got it even higher for them not to use it.
And here again, all you Republicans worried about the social issues.
You look at 54% of independents turn away from Obama on this mandate business.
Contraception mandate, all of them.
Okay.
Eric in Glen Arbor, Michigan, you're next on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello, sir.
Hi, Rush.
Longtime listener from the early Clinton years.
Thank you, sir.
Um the reason why I'm calling is uh it's about the oil prices and what we're paying at the pump.
Lots of news about it.
And if we go to five, six dollar a gallon oil, that's gonna sink the economy.
And I think it's time to fight back.
And I think we can fight back by uh uh several uh perspectives.
One, we as a consumer can cut back slightly on our fuel usage, and two, instead of just releasing thirty million barrels of oil from the strategic energy reserves, we need to do it in a strategic manner.
For example, release seven million barrels of oil at say eighty-nine dollars a barrel.
It's about a hundred and nine bucks a barrel today, release it at below the market price, and then make several subsequent releases without telling anybody.
There's not there's not enough oil there to to make it different.
The real question here is what is the price of algae by the gallon?
Because that's that's you know, Obama has suggested pond scum as uh the the next alternative fuel for for oil.
And I we we cannot, by the way, and I I I appreciate the uh uh the the the the big heartedness here in wanting to conserve.
Uh but we can't there's gonna be forced conservation at five dollars a gallon.
There was it four.
People will drive less because they can't afford it.
By the way, the economy is already sinking.
But you get up to five or six dollars a gallon, you won the the choice to conserve will not be something you have to force on people.
It'll it'll be happening naturally.
But even at that, conserving is not growth.
And growth is what our economy needs.
Growth and supply, growth and expansion, demand, all these things.
That's what this country and this economy needs.
We can't conserve our way to growth of anything.
Danica Patrick did say this.
Danica Patrick, the uh indie car driver.
I leave it up to the government to make good decisions for Americans.
That's about health care.
Danica Patrick, I leave it up to the government to make good decisions for America.
▲
Export Selection