All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 20, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:00
January 20, 2012, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right, 99.7% of the time.
It's a new Sullivan Group opinion audit.
Just announced this week.
It's Friday.
Let's keep it rolling.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday and one big broadcast hour to go.
Busy broadcast hour here where you determine what it is that we talk about.
Well, when we go to the phones, you determine that.
And I have today suspended any analysis of last night's debate in lieu of hearing yours.
And we're going to continue that through this hour.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address, L Rushbo at EIBNet.com.
There are other items in the news.
Sides of debate out there.
There is a great piece at the Heritage Foundation, their morning bell, which is one of the many Heritage Foundation blogs.
Obama has been in Disney World all week.
Shutting down Main Street, as it were, to go meet Mickey Mouse.
Convention of big-eared people.
And the jokes were all abundant that Obama, they had to shut down Main Street, USA at Disney World, I think where it was.
And the Heritage Foundation has a great piece here.
Obama's magic kingdom of joblessness.
Yesterday, Walt Disney World, a land where dreams come true.
President Obama appeared before Cinderella's castle to announce his latest plan to boost the boost jobs in America.
An effort to increase tourism in the United States.
This the same guy who told people not to go to Las Vegas.
His announcement came one day after he flat out said no to a plan that would have directly created at least 20,000 truly shovel-ready jobs and 179,000 American jobs by 2035, the Keystone XL pipeline.
Had the president approved the Keystone Pipeline, a 1,700-mile pipeline, would have extended from Alberta, Canada to Texas refineries, lifting up the U.S. economy with private sector investment, putting people to work and helping increase the supply of energy, which would lower prices when fuel costs are through the roof.
They've doubled.
Gasoline pump prices have doubled since Obama was immaculated.
The president is so out of line with fact and reason.
The Washington Post, as I mentioned yesterday, strongly condemned the decision in an op-ed, saying the pipeline rejection's hard to accept.
Today in the Washington Post, economist Robert Samuelson says that rejecting the Keystone pipeline's an act of insanity.
Washington Post continued, we almost hope this was a political call, because on the substance, there should be no question.
We almost hope it was a political so we can have an excuse.
We at the Washington Post want an excuse for this insanity.
You think they would be that broadly for giving a Republican similar decision?
Gosh, we hope this is they will tolerate Obama's political decisions.
Well, obviously, yes.
As the Post explained, even without the pipeline, Canada's still going to export its all.
But across the ocean to the Chicoms.
Meanwhile, the United States will continue importing crude from the Middle East.
In other words, the environmental lobby might have stanched the flow of all from Canada, but it's being diverted onto the seas.
And fossil fuel consumption will necessarily continue.
To transport all on the seas, the environmental left's victory, quote unquote, is ultimately another loss for the American people, especially the 13.1 million unemployed Americans.
It's a loss for small business, such as restaurants and hotels in the towns along the proposed pipeline route.
It's a loss for state Budgets.
That would have seen billions in tax revenue as a result, and it's also a loss.
For those who are struggling with high energy costs.
Gas prices are at a record high for January.
28.5 cents per gallon higher than a year ago, and that's expected to go even higher.
Some analysts predict that the national average for a gallon of a regular unleaded, which nobody buys, could hit four to four twenty-five a gallon by this spring.
Now one might think that given the high cost of energy, the president would be seeking to increase domestic production.
Especially given Iran's threat to block the Strait of Hormuz.
Hormas, for those of you in Rio Linda.
Think again, under President Obama, all and natural gas production on federal lands is down by more than 40% compared to ten years ago.
2010 had the lowest number of leases issued for oil and gas production on federal land since 1984.
And the regime held only one offshore lease sale in 2011.
There's a moratorium they've put in place.
What nobody mentions here is that Obama's all in on green energy.
That's where the crony capitalism is.
That's where his donors are being repaid.
There's one bright spot in the nation for energy production.
North Dakota, overall energy production has increased thanks to the state's pro-energy policies.
North Dakota has reaped the benefits, as have other like-minded states.
As Heritage reports, North Dakota unemployment rate 3.4%.
The lowest in the country.
According to a recent report from IHS Global Insight, North Dakota already returned to pre-recession employment along with energy rich Alaska.
Texas expected to do so in the first quarter of this year, followed by Nebraska and South Dakota next year.
All related all.
Meanwhile, President Obama singled out Charles Wrangell for praise during a campaign fundraiser last night, seeming to complete the political rehabilitation of a lawmaker whose colleagues censured him in 2010 for eleven ethics violations.
Now, what I find fascinating is the media can't wait to get to the bottom of Newt Gingri about Mitt Romney's taxes.
Just can't wait.
Can't wait to prove that Romney's parking money offshore hiding it.
Not paying his fair share.
Meanwhile, there's Obama raising money with an acknowledged tax cheat.
Just amazing.
Charles Wrangell, Obama loves the guy, cheated on his taxes.
But who does the media go after?
Nitt Romney.
A guy who has paid his taxes in full.
Interesting, um, wait, no, it's not.
It's not interesting given who wrote it.
Something in the New York Times that's unlike the New York Times, but a conservative wrote it, so it may as well not even be in the New York Times.
So what is this Huffing and Puffington host?
Despite conventional wisdom that the divorce rate is still increasing.
The fact of the matter is the divorce rate in the U.S. is the lowest.
It has been since it peaked in the early 80s.
Nevertheless, couples getting married today have about a 40 to 45% chance of getting divorced.
Many factors influence risk for divorce.
Sociological studies show that couples with higher levels of education are less likely to divorce.
In addition, research at the University of Denver's Center for Marital and Family Studies shows that couples who live together without a commitment to marry and then marry are at higher risk for divorce than couples who do not live.
Well, this is nothing new.
Everything in this story I've known for 20 years.
What is what do you think all of a sudden is the reason for all these studies on marriage?
Well, let me answer it for you this way with another.
Why in the mid-90s were we hit with a plethora of stories on how Lying is good.
Bill Clinton was in charge and he was a serial liar, and we had to have stories.
It's no big deal.
In fact, it's actually very compassionate.
Sometimes actually very compassionate.
Sometimes lying spares people hurt feelings.
Sometimes we should lie.
Sometimes it's the nice thing to do.
They got stories like that too.
Now, all of a sudden, the divorce rate, it's not increasing.
All of a sudden, it's not as bad as we thought it was, even though when you read further, you find out it is.
But the leads is not as bad.
I wonder why that is.
Newt Gingrich.
That's why.
Newt's a divorcee.
Now all of a sudden we got a stigmatize it by showing and having studies and stories that it's not as widespread as it used to be.
So typical.
So understandable.
Mind manipulation by the drive-by media.
Okay, take a quick oh, here's another one.
You talk about a great economic indicator.
This is an AP story out of Detroit.
Americans are holding on to cars and trucks longer.
The average age of a vehicle in America is ten point eight years.
Now that's telling.
That is very telling.
The Polk research firm said uh earlier this week the average age of a car last July was eleven point one years.
The truck average was ten point four.
So you combine those two, you get ten point eight.
Unemployment and a sour economy have caused people to put off buying cars and trucks.
Shazam, you think?
Really?
Ten point eight years.
Used to be you could pay off your car in three.
Do you remember those days?
The car loan was a three-year property.
You remember those days, Brian?
You probably don't.
Average car loan was a three-year thing, and then you'd roll it over and get a new model.
That's that's that's the way it worked.
They come out with uh significant body style changes every three years.
And you'd roll your loan over, you'd pay off your car, you'd trade up, trade in, whatever, and you'd keep it going that way.
You'd pretty much could pay off the loan, get close to it in three years.
Now that's not even close.
Ha!
How are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, open line Friday.
Grab audio sound by number 15, the CNN.
This is uh last night on the Situation Room with Wolf uh Wolf uh uh blitzer.
And he had uh Jeannie Moss on there, uh gadfly uh info babe reporter ed.
And she did a report on allegations by Newt's wife that Newt asked her for an open marriage.
And she talked about this program and a caller to this program yesterday.
Rush Limbaugh had to defend Newt to a conservative caller for whom the subject was closed.
An open marriage?
I mean, so Calista's gonna be the first lady?
Are you kidding me?
We've already had one.
Huh?
We've already had an open marriage in the White House.
Maybe with the Kennedys, how many open marriages?
Where do they get the machine that makes my voice sound so gravelly?
Or does it sound that way, just not that way to me.
Ah, good.
Okay, good.
It's the way they record it.
Were they still using cassette machines?
Is that what they do?
A microphone in front of a radio, is that what they do?
It must.
It doesn't sound like it's a direct audio feed.
Ah, well, who's complained?
Suzanne in Elkart, Indians.
We go back to the phones.
Welcome to Open Line Friday.
Great to talk to you, Rush.
Thank you very much.
I listen to you every day.
You're you're my mentor.
I appreciate it.
I really do.
I understand too.
Thank you.
Uh I I uh have an opinion about the debate.
I um was unable to listen, but I followed it as much as I can on radio.
But um just this week we celebrated Martin Luther King's birthday, and we're supposed to judge this country supposed to think about judging a man by his character.
I'm wondering where is everybody's character.
Rick Santorum is much better a man, much more Christian man, and he can't buy the presidency.
I'd like to see South Carolina supports him.
I'm really disappointed there hasn't been more support already in the polls.
He is at 15% pre-debate.
I haven't seen uh if there's been a flash poll since the debate.
I haven't heard either, and I and I listen continually.
I'm in a hospital bed and not.
Oh no.
What happened?
Well, I have multiple sclerosis.
Oh, gee.
But but you know, I get a lot of religion and I get a lot of politics this way.
Well, my gosh, I'm sorry to hear that.
I mean that you're in a hospital.
No, I'm in the hospital bed.
Oh, you're at home in a hospital bed.
Yeah, I'm I'm very happily at home.
Oh, good.
Well, that's that's better than being in a hospital in a hospital bed.
Well, yeah, the Santorum right now is at 13% nationally.
You know, it isn't you go back to the to the uh uh campaign of nineteen ninety-two.
This is kind of interesting.
It is.
1992, the whole character thing on our side of the aisle was number one.
It was that and Clinton's liberalism and uh Hillary with uh uh Obama care uh Hillary care at the time, but Clinton was so known for the mistresses and the uh alleged rape of Juanita Broderick, so known for it that we were scratching our heads wondering why do the American people not care.
And the Clinton campaign was all about how rotten the George H. W. Bush economy was and this so-called recession, worst economy last fifty years, that we were lied to about.
So we were scratching our heads.
Now, jumpstart, and my my point is Moynihan, Daniel Moynihan, you just the longer this stuff goes on, the more you define deviancy down.
When you can't stop it, you simply say, let's stop trying, and we'll declare it normal.
And that's how you define deviancy down, and you legitimize what used to be a crime, or you legitimize what used to be immoral.
So now the same people, the same people in many cases, and this is not a criticism, it's an observation.
The same people who wanted to roast Clinton are now saying, hey, Newt's paid his dues, we believe in forgiveness, uh, this kind of thing, and what is on the other side of it?
We think the country's being destroyed, and we uh we really believe that we it doesn't matter.
The only thing that matters is stopping Obama, that we can't afford four more years of this kind of radical, of this kind of anti-Americanism.
Somebody wants to drastically transform and change the country in ways that we won't recognize it.
So a lot of people who in 92 staked their entire vote on character and morality.
Now subordinate it to further down the list.
And this has you scratching your head, correct?
That's what television's done for us.
It's destroyed, decayed our morality and our our culture.
All this stuff, all this crap on television.
You actually think it's television.
I think it is because I don't even watch it anymore.
I have nothing to do with it.
And I and we don't have cable, but we're we my husband wants to get it, but he he works nights, and I said, I don't need it.
I don't need to see blood and guts and and sexual immorality continually all night.
Well, you know, she might have a point.
I mean, you you you look around at at I Catherine and I'll be watching TV, network TV.
If somebody use a word, that twenty years ago was i no way.
I mean it's not thinkable.
Ten years ago not thinkable.
Bastard and bitch are common on primetime TV now.
Uh pissed off, common on primetime TV.
Yeah, the vulgar vulgar language just with all that, you you don't you don't see the uh morality police worried about that, but let there be a divorced candidate in the race with an ex-wife that's talking about open marriages all of a sudden it's a giant scandal.
So, as always, there seems to be a missing sense of proportion in all this.
But I don't disagree with you that our culture is coursening, that morality is being redefined, and so forth.
I just I do, as a cultural observer, it is interesting to take note of it.
Yes, I think so.
And so you're wondering, you your your experience is we stand for character and morality.
The founding fathers demanded it if you look at the if you look at the uh the uh uh Federal Federalist Papers and the and when on the Federalist papers and the qualifications of the chief executive, morality character number one above all else.
You got a guy you think Santorum passes that test, and he can't get past first base.
It's gotta frustrate you.
I understand.
Back we are.
We're gonna do some Santorum sunbites here, and I will have a uh couple thoughts on the uh AFC NFC championship games on Sunday.
We've got the Baltimore Ravens, the New England Patriots in the early game, a three o'clock game on Sunday, and the Giants at the Forturners on Sunday at 6:30.
Are you interested in that game?
Well, you're a Cowboys fan.
Are you?
Oh, so if you're pulling for the Fordiners.
Ah.
All right.
Rick Santorum is at 13% nationally in the polls.
He's uh, I think at Rasmussen at 15% in South Dakota.
By the way, Mitt Romney, I should tell you, Mitt Romney has uh opened up a new line of attack against Gingrich today.
He has called on Mr. Newt to release the full report from the ethics investigation that led to his downfall in Congress.
Romney said today, you know, it's gonna get out before the general election.
He ought to get it out now.
This is payback for Newt last night saying to Romney, look, if there's any of these tax returns that's going to embarrass you, you better get it out there now before we get our nominee.
You better get it out there now so everybody knows, so we're not embarrassed.
If you end up being the nominee, you put some out there that synks you were in big trouble.
You better put it out.
And Romney's saying the same thing.
And uh what a lot of Republicans are saying that, look, look, Nancy Pelosi knows what's in that ethics report.
She was on the committee.
She's even threatened to go public.
Now, theoretically, it's against the law.
We're talking Democrats here.
That's why it's theoretical.
But Pelosi knows what's in Newt's ethics report.
So Romney has turned the tables today.
Wolf Blitzer.
Ha ha!
Look at this.
Wolf Blitzer's got a blog.
Bad blood could impact Republican ticket.
What insight.
Who did John King tell him that?
How did Wolf find that out?
By the way, John Adams, I mean, just to back up my point, the Federalist Papers and the Founders when discussing the qualities, qualifications of a chief executive, president.
John Adams' October 11th, 1798, our Constitution.
This is not Federalist Papers, this is in addition.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
And his point is being illustrated.
We've got people running this country that couldn't care less about the Constitution.
In any moral or religious sense, none whatsoever.
Okay, here is Santorum.
And as I say, a lot of people I talk to, uh, my friends, emails.
People I don't know, people I don't like, people that don't know I don't like them.
Uh have uh sent me emails, and Santorum was the winner in their minds.
Best performance yet.
Really nailed it to Romney, really nailed it to Gingrich, really spoke up for himself.
Best debate performance yet.
If anybody had any guts, anybody can be honest, it was a smoke.
It was it was Santorum all the way, and nobody was even close.
I can't tell you how many people shared with me that thought, that review of the debate last night.
So let's listen.
This is Santorum talking about Newt's unpredictability and his grandiosities.
The question from John King.
Senator Santorum, Speaker Gingrich said he thought it'd be preferable for the conservative movement if one candidate in his view had a direct campaign against Governor Romney.
So it was up to you.
But he suggested maybe Perry and Santorum get out of the race.
In suggesting it, he said this.
You don't have any of the knowledge for how to do something on this scale.
Newt said that about you, Senator Santorum.
What do you say to that?
Grandiosity has never been a problem with Newt Gingrich.
He handles it very, very well.
And that's really one of the issues here, folks.
I mean, a month ago he was saying that, oh, I'm it's inevitable that I'm going to win the election, and it's I'm destined to do it.
I don't want a nominee that I have to worry about going out and looking at the paper the next day and figuring out what is he can't worrying about what he's going to say next.
And that's that's what I think we're seeing here.
And there was significant applause to that, and that has been something that a lot of people who support Newt have offered as a reservation.
That's why I even I said the other day that maybe half his brain needs to be tied behind his back just to uh limit that kind of thing happening.
But grandiosity, when I could counter with some grandiose ideas, such as the Declaration of Independence.
That was a pretty grandiose idea.
I will bet you there were people in the colonies who thought the writers and the signers of the declaration were insane, and wished they would shut up for all the hell that was going to descend on them because they were doing it.
You want to bet I'm right.
I know I'm totally right.
The Louisiana Purchase.
Thomas Jefferson.
Grandiose idea.
The Lewis and Clark expedition, send two guys and a team to map the Louisiana Purchase.
Find the Northwest Passage.
Think of that.
Grandiose idea.
Connect the coasts with a Continental Railroad.
The emancipation proc.
Can you imagine what the popular sentiment must have been in certain parts of the country when that came along?
How nutty some people thought that was landing men on the moon and returning them safely?
While actually filming the whole thing in a studio in Arizona.
Just kidding.
I mean, we're filled with grandiose ideas.
The idea this country is a grandiose idea.
I remember an Apple commercial.
It was a testament to Steve Jobs.
Here's to the crazy ones the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes, the ones who see things differently.
They're not fond of rules, and they have no respect for the status quo.
You can quote them, you can disagree with them, glorify or vilify it about the only thing you can't do is ignore them because they change things.
They push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.
That was Steve Jobs.
They turned that into an Apple commercial.
You might even say grandiosity in the defense of liberty is a virtue.
So you could play it both ways.
Anyway, that's Santorum ripping Newt.
This is Newt replying.
You're right.
I think grandiose thoughts.
is a grandiose country of big people doing big things, and we need leadership prepared to take on big projects.
And one more bite.
This is Santorum taking on Romney and Newt, but basically taking them out in one answer.
The question from John King.
Senator Santorum, you heard Governor Romney and you heard Speaker Gingrich.
Do you trust them?
If one of them is the Republican Party nominee, potentially the next president of the United States to repeal Obamacare.
Do you trust them to do that?
Governor Romney tells a very nice story about what his plan is now.
When he was governor of Massachusetts, he put forth Romney care, which was not a bottom-up free market system.
It was a government-run health care system that was the basis of Obamacare, and it has been an abject failure.
Speaker Gingrich, who has been who has been for an individual mandate just a few years ago.
He stood up and said that either should have an individual mandate or post a hundred and fifty thousand dollar bond.
How many hundred and fifty thousand dollar bondholders do we have here who can post a bond for their health insurance?
These are two folks who don't present the clear contrast that I do, who is the author of health savings accounts, which is the primary basis of every single conservative reform of health care.
That was a great point.
He's pointing out these guys say they're going to repeal it.
Obamacare is Romney care.
Verse Vice.
Newt, he was all for the individual mandate.
I'm the guy who has never crossed the line.
I'm the guy who's never been for national socialized health care of any kind.
I've never been on one side of it, had to change my mind and come up with an excuse.
I am the purest, is what Santorum was saying.
Romney finally decided to go on offense, defending Bain Capital and defending capitalism.
I'd like to talk about something else that President Obama has been doing.
He's been practicing crony capitalism.
And if you want to get America going again, you've got to stop the spread of crony capitalism.
He gives General Motors to the UAW.
He takes 500 million dollars and sticks it into Cylindra.
He uh he stacks the labor studious on the NLRB so they can say no to Boeing and take care of their friends in the labor movement.
This president is the biggest impediment to job growth in this country, and we have to replace Barack Obama to get America working again.
Romney had a good night, Les, a better night than he had on Monday night.
Romney had a good he continued with this.
We started a number of businesses.
Four in particular created 120,000 jobs as of today.
We started them years ago.
They've grown grown well beyond the time I was there to 120,000 people that have been employed by those enterprises.
There are others we've been with, some of which have lost jobs.
People have evaluated that since uh well, since I ran four years ago when I ran for governor.
And those that have been documented to have lost jobs lost about 10,000 jobs.
So 120,000 less 10 means that we created something over 100,000 jobs.
Right on right on right up.
But what they wanted, and the the question was can you get a math for us?
How'd you get to 100,000 jobs?
Well, we just got there, and then we lost 10.
So that 110 total.
See, there's the math.
No, no.
Where do you got from zero to a hundred thousand jobs?
How'd you get that's with the math that John King wanted and didn't get?
But Romney, this this is the answer I think that most people who liked Romney's performance last night liked, in which he finally came out, said there's nothing wrong with profit.
There's nothing wrong with profit, by the way.
That profit.
That profit went to pension funds, to charities.
It went to uh a wide array of institutions.
A lot of people benefited from that, and by the way, as enterprises become more profitable, they can hire more people.
I I'm someone who believes in free enterprise.
I think Adam Smith was right, and I'm gonna stand and defend capitalism across this country throughout this campaign.
I know we're gonna hit it hard for President Obama, but we're gonna stuff it down his throat and point out it is capitalism and freedom that makes America strong.
You do not hear too many Republican candidates defending profit.
Hey, run away from it.
Consultants don't even go there.
Don't try to justify profit.
You can't do it.
Uh, don't sing the praise of capitalism.
Don't do this he's he threw it all away and just went for it.
It was that answer that I think the Romney fans focused on as the reason he finally came alive and finally had a debate worthy of his stature last night.
Do-ba-ba-doo-doo-da Okay, National Football League championship games, the AFC game at three o'clock.
It's the New England Patriots hosting the uh the Baltimore Ravens.
Give you an interesting statistic.
Ryan, you may not know this.
The New England Patriots, regular season record 13-3.
They did not beat a team with a winning record the whole season.
Now stop and they won 13 games and did not beat a team with a winning record.
They lost to the Steelers.
They lost to the New York Giants.
They had, by quirk of fate, the weakest schedule.
The record of their combined opponents was 450.459.
Less than 50%.
I think that is an amazing statistic.
The Patriots also had to put at least 30 points up every week to have a chance.
Their defense finished 31st in the league out of 32.
But as they often say, throw that out once you get to the playoffs.
Last week, the Patriots stunned, not really, the Denver Broncos, the Tebos.
The Tebos did not have a winning record.
Tebos were what?
8-8.
Finish the season.
Forget where they might have had a mining record.
The Ravens can't score points.
Like the Steelers.
They just did they're having trouble in fighting with their quarterback Flacco.
Brady, on the other hand, can score at will.
Everybody cites, well, yeah, but look back rush 2009.
The Patriots creamed them.
33-13 or something.
Yeah, but back then they'd have Wells Welker and they'd have the two tight ends.
New England Patriots own the middle of the field.
They didn't do that on offense.
They haven't been able to do that.
They weren't able to do that in 2009.
I um this game is really let me just I'm gonna be shocked.
I'm gonna not shocked.
I'm gonna be surprised if the Super Bowl is not New England San Francisco.
There's rain falling in San Francisco.
The Forderners uh field is underwater anyway.
It's below sea level, could be a mutter game, and that favors the Fordiners.
Because that means you got to run the ball.
The Giants down at the bottom of the list in the running game.
Their passing game depends on speed, which is neutered with a muck wet field, and it's gonna be covered, but it's still below sea level anyway.
Four days of rain.
It's it's it's gonna be more.
I um Giants have a couple injuries nobody's talking about either tight end is not doing well.
Uh the Fordiners basically uh, aside from a wideout are are healthy.
They clearly have the edge in the uh in the running game, theoretically.
However, the Giants are peaking, you know, Giants are playing well at this point in the season, but so are the Fordiners.
I think they're both gonna be barn burner games.
I think they both have a chance to be good.
And I can see upsets in both of them.
Home team is no longer the built-in advantage that it used to be in this weekend, the divisional round weekend last week, and it um it is.
But, and just looking at the games straight up.
Uh I'll be I'll be surprised if the Super Bowl is not New England and the uh and the Fordiners.
Is that an official pick?
I guess I have to stand by that as an official pick.
So what it's what it is.
We'll see.
Three o'clock Sunday, it all kicks off, and we'll find out.
Okay, I know you're thinking.
Wait a minute, Rush haven't told us what you thought about the debate.
I pretty much agree with what people on the phone said.
I can't tell you what I thought.
This one at times I can't tell you.
Call it a draw.
Nothing's gonna change much from it, and that's uh pretty much what I'll say.
I I disagree largely with one sentiment that most of my friends told me about, but I'm not gonna dare tell you what it is because it's pointless.
Um, but I think Romney probably wasn't hurt enough to have it matter, so that's the end result.
Noodle probably do well on to Florida.
We'll go.
▲
Export Selection