All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 13, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:46
January 13, 2012, Friday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
From high atop.
No, we're not high atop anything here.
Well, we're close to high atop from the EIB Southern Command.
Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone on Friday, live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Telephone numbers 1800-282-2882.
I'm going to get to your calls quickly.
I meant to in the last hour.
And then I got diarrhea of the mouth.
But I promise, we'll get to your calls in this.
I really do.
I try to get more calls done on Friday.
There's just so much going on here.
800-282-2882, again, if you want to be on the program.
And open line Friday is your chance to talk about things that Monday through Thursday, you wouldn't stand a prayer of being able to talk about.
So the Gallup poll is out, two different Gallup polls, according to Gallup, for more than three years now, 40% of Americans describe their views as conservative.
35% as moderate, 21% as liberal.
So as I saw poignantly saliently inquired, previous hour, why is it that all of the polling organizations like Gallup continue to oversample Democrats and independents.
And we know they're not Democrats.
What percentage of it might be Democrats?
There might be some in there.
The old Reagan Democrats, so forth.
But given our culture and given the way the media presents life in this planet in this country, this is a stunning poll.
40% of people identify themselves as being conservative.
That's a little short of amazing.
Just imagine how conservative this country would be if we had a level playing field.
Imagine how conservative this country would be if conservatism was not maligned, impugned, and laughed at, made fun of all of that.
Imagine if the entire establishment, the news media, the entertainment industry, educational system, publishing.
Imagine if they were all not lockstep liberals.
Imagine what this country would be.
In other words, imagine if more people were allowed to hear more of the truth.
This is why, folks, for me, it's all ideological.
Ideas are ideological.
It's not party versus party, it's liberal versus everybody else.
And that's why I've always believed that the more we spend time telling people about liberalism and liberals, the much greater advance we would make.
The second Gallup poll is this one.
Americans name jobs, the national debt, and continuing economic decline, outsourcing, and politicians bickering when asked to say what worries them most about the national economy at this time.
The first three on the list, the national debt, jobs, and continuing economic compliance decline makeup 51%.
Those three.
The other stuff is small potatoes.
You have to go down to the bottom of the list to find out how many people say that the divide between rich and poor is one of their primary concerns.
In fact, the number is 2%.
2%.
It's up there with campaign finance reform.
Only 2%.
Consider the divide between rich and poor.
The haves that have the whole argument for class envy.
The whole argument for redistribution.
Only 2% of the people in this country identify it as something that's a major concern to them.
You got that?
That means Occupy Wall Street is a creation of the regime.
Occupy Wall Street didn't gin up on its own.
There's no such thing as a 2% movement.
That ends up being covered as Occupy Wall Street was.
Americans are worried about jobs, the deficit, the economy, not the divide between rich and poor.
Now, in polling data, this is interesting too, if I can remember this, I don't have it right in front of me.
In polling day that I've seen of people who are concerned about the divide between the rich and the poor, people are less concerned about what they have than they are more concerned what somebody else has.
See if I can find a better way.
In the rich versus poor, the US versus them, the gap between wealth and poverty, whatever.
The people on the low end are not upset about what they don't have.
They're upset what the others do have.
That is envy.
That is what Obama is playing off of.
They're not unhappy with what they have.
They're ticked off at what others have.
Now you might watch the difference.
It's a huge difference.
If the majority of them were unhappy with what they had, that would mean they didn't care what anybody else has.
This when when they're more concerned what others have than what they don't have, they themselves don't have.
That's just pure envy, resentment, what have you.
And that represents an opportunity for the class envy warriors to go out and exploit them.
All you got, oh yeah, I'll take it away from them.
I'll take it away from them.
That's how you get them.
You don't have to tell them I'll give you more.
I'll you don't have to say I'll make sure you end up I'll you have to say I'm just gonna go out and sock it to them.
Two fascinating polls here.
Both of those are from Gallup.
Audio soundbite time.
This is, and I delayed this.
I could have done this the first hour.
We have sound bites about me.
So let's get started.
Last night on the NBC nightly news.
This is a portion of a report by the correspondent Ron Mott about the South Carolina Republican primary.
As the race moved to South Carolina this week, whispers about Romney's business past became full-blown attacks.
Newt and Perry blew it the last two days, prompting prominent conservative voices from Rush Limbaugh to several wealthy Republican donors to push back hard.
So again, uh, folks, I that's only two percent hate the one percent.
Well, no.
Only two percent no.
Two per only two percent hate the one.
Yeah, that's right.
Only two percent hate the one percent.
That's that's that's a great way of illustrating.
Only two percent hate the one percent.
The 99% do not hate the one percent.
So now I am a prominent conservative.
This varies from week to week, depending on what I'm saying.
One week I'm irrelevant and just an entertainer.
Uh another week I could just be making it all up and a liar.
Uh this week I'm a prominent, powerful, influential, conservative.
Last night on Fox, that show they have at five o'clock called the five.
You know why they call it the five?
It's no, it's not five women, unless you count Beckle.
No, no, it's not, it's it's five people at five o'clock.
And they couldn't name it after anybody because that person would have to get more money than the other four, and then they have ego problems.
You don't even really know who the host of the show is.
They rotate, do a pretty good job of this.
The five at five.
And they can put anybody in there.
They do have a regular rotation.
And the rotation yesterday was Eric Bowling, the good guy from the Fox Business Network, and Beckle was in there.
And I think Kimberly Gilfoy is part of this group.
Dana Perino's part of the group, and Angela Tarantula is uh part of the group.
Uh Republican consultant, Angela Tarantula.
And they were talking here about, well, Eric Bowling says Obama lost 1.7.
What?
No, no, no, no, no, no.
Bowling said Obama lost 1.7 million jobs on his watch.
Social engineering of the American economy doesn't seem to be working.
That prompted Beckle.
Since his stimulus package was put into effect, he's actually gained 1.4 million jobs.
Let's talk about what Rush said.
To say that the President of the United States is a sworn enemy of capitalism is actually pretty outrageous statement.
No, it's accurate.
That's bowling thing accurate.
But Beckle thing is pretty outrageous.
No, it's true.
Maybe not sworn.
Now may I don't think I've I don't think I've said Obama's a sworn enemy.
I think Obama stood up and said.
Well, no, wait a minute.
When he went to Osawatomi, Kansas, he did say America's never worked.
It has in describing capitalism, not by name, but he's never in fact he has mentioned capitalism as not working as as being unfair and so forth.
Regardless, he is an enemy of it.
There's no doubt about it.
Most Democrats are.
I don't know why Beckle's so nervous about this.
Most Democrats are enemies of capitalism.
They don't like it.
Last night on MSNBC, the last word, the host Lawrence O'Donnell spoke with MSNBC's uh Chris Hayes.
Chris Hayes about attacks on former Governor Romney during the Republican primary.
And uh O'Donnell said, Sarah Palin's over here, Rush Limbaugh's over here, sharp disagreements.
This is even more, it seems to me, than the Obama campaign could have hoped for.
They may have hoped for a longer contest for the nomination, but they couldn't have hoped for a better fight.
Well, they're talking here about Newt and Perry going after Romney this way.
Oh, Obama loves this, it's fabulous.
There is a way in which it's feasible to conceive of this as inoculating in some ways.
There is an argument I think you can make that it makes the story when it that these attacks come directly from the president or allied super PACs in the fall, have less of a bite because people kind of know the story and they've made up their mind on it.
The analogy here is if the Jeremiah Wright tape had surfaced in October as opposed to April, that would have been much harder for the president.
That may end up benefiting the campaign long run.
So this guy is saying, no, no.
Uh Mr. Nonald, you might not be right about this.
It could well be that this coming out now gets it out of the way, no matter that Obama will bring it up again.
This gets it out of the way.
Romney has a chance to deal with it, defend it, see how he does it.
So they're a little worried.
Bottom line is they are a little worried on the Obama side this stuff has coming out.
But notice that they equivocate or not they not equivocate.
They draw an analogy to the Jeremiah Wright tapes.
They're calling this the equivalent of the Jeremiah No.
Romney working with Bain is the same as the Jeremiah Wright tapes.
And that's not true.
That is insane.
What Jeremiah Wright tapes anyway?
I mean, I know what he's talking about.
There are any Jeremiah Wright tapes other than the DVDs that he sells.
His church sells any misting tapes out there, secret tapes that people took.
The sermons.
All right, we're going to the phones now.
Open line Friday, and we're starting in Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Peter, you're up first.
It's great to have you here.
Hello, Rush.
How are you?
Very well, thank you.
I'm honored to be your first caller today.
That's a big it's a big responsibility.
It sets the tone.
Yeah, I know, I know, I know.
Uh listen, I have to put you on the spot.
Uh you keep saying on practically a daily basis, that if the election were held today, Obama loses on a landslide.
Well, to whom.
Whoever runs.
Oh, yeah.
Uh Ron Paul beats Obama in a landfly.
Well Huntsman meets uh Obama in a landslide today.
Huntsman might.
I'm saying that, but but but these guys, you're you want to stick to the list of potential nominees?
We know that Huntsman's not going to be the nominee and Ron Paul's not going to be the nominee.
You know I'm using a rhetorical device.
I am trying to illustrate that this is not a lock.
I know that there are people out there thinking this guy can't be beat.
And there are people on our side who thinking this guy is not going to be easy right here overstating it here.
I mean, he's got a billion dollars.
He's got this.
My point in saying this is that the people of this country want a change badly.
They are not happy with this.
There is nowhere near a majority of people who want any more of this, but it's never reported.
It's not this.
I I I really believe that the majority of people in this country, if they had a chance to get rid of this administration would do it, is my point.
But they wouldn't do it just, you know, with anyone.
I mean, if somehow Ron Paul, you know, was a nominee, I mean, he is way, way down there compared to uh Obama, you know, and according to every major poll, uh, you don't have matchup, uh Obama would win in a landslide.
Yeah.
But Ron Paul's not gonna be the nominee.
So you're just saying of the most likely nominee like uh like Romney or Newt or whatever.
Yeah.
Sarah Pearl, you take it.
Romney uh Newt, Santorum, Bachman would have, I think.
Okay, so you're saying Romney, Newt, Santorum would all beat Obama in a landslide today.
Yeah, I think the the real meaning here is that Obama can be beat.
Obama can be defeated.
He's not invincible, and it's not automatic.
He's gonna be reelected.
And the point is that the vast majority of people in this country don't want four more years of this.
Right, but they have to think what's the alternative, you know.
The twenty ten elections show us the alternative.
The alternative is the Republican Party.
There wasn't the people that abandoned the Democrats in 2010 didn't weren't voting for a guy.
They were voting against a guy.
They were voting against a party.
That 2010 election, that was a massive landslide victory all the way down to dog catcher on the ballot.
That was big.
Well, it's a shame that people, you know have have to vote against one party and not for a candidate or for a party that they they they can't be.
Well, naturally I would prefer that there be a four-vote.
Uh that because that's how you get a mandate.
Of course I would prefer, and then and that will be the case by the time we get there.
By the time there is a nominee and the uh circumstances exist and the contrast are drawn, there will be that.
Well, hold on.
And I think people instinctively understand it already.
They know that they don't want this.
They now know what liberalism is.
They know what Marxism is, they don't want it.
They don't want the health care bill.
Sixty-five percent, fifty-eight percent.
Take your poll.
Don't want the health care bill.
Now you disagree with me, obviously.
You you I've seen polls.
I I I look at, you know, all the major polls out there, Rasmussen.
Uh, you know, I I tracked uh the the daily polls, uh particularly Rasmussen almost every day.
And actually, in the latest poll for whatever it might mean to you, uh Romney trails Obama by about three points.
I didn't see that poll.
I saw a poll that says Romney beats him by three points on Fox this morning.
That was, I think about uh Yeah, I I think I I I saw that.
That was that was uh Fox uh Rasmussen that I know only polls, likely voters.
Uh well, you should know.
If you're a regular listener, you should know.
I couldn't care less what a presidential poll today says uh, you know uh uh victory, it's it's a tie at best.
Victory is a tie at in the poll.
Yeah, I I as if as I'm saying, I don't care about a poll of an event in November today.
I don't care about it.
I'm using my instincts here.
I'm not I'm not arguing with polls.
I'm not telling you I disagree with the polls.
I'm saying I don't pay any attention to them.
That's not how I I have an empathy.
I have a gut instinct about things.
I don't polling data for me is that that that it's it's sort of like what the um investing is hope.
Investing in hope is the recipe for not doing anything.
Relying on polls means you don't have to think.
It means you don't have to take a risk.
The polls say this.
The polls say that.
So that dictates everything else you do.
Sorry, not me.
So this is a good thing.
You mean if there is a poll out there right now, and you've told me there is that says Romney loses to Obama.
Well then let's let's quit.
Let's pack it in.
Poll says.
I don't that's this is why I'm not in politics, I guess.
But uh I don't use polls.
In fact, I think polls are used to make news.
I think polls are part and parcel of news making quote unquote process.
But I get your point.
You think I'm wrong.
You think that I'm not living in the world of reality.
You think I have moved out of Literalville and into fantasy land.
And you think that I am existing entirely on hope and prayer, winging a prayer, whatever, and I am so devoid of reality, and if I keep this up, people have false confidence, and I'm gonna be responsible for Obama winning.
You think I have totally moved out of out of out of realville.
And I'm telling you that I don't think the polls are reality.
Pure and simple.
Let's take a poll on who's gonna win, T Bowl or Brady tomorrow night.
And then when the poll's over, let's not play the game.
The poll said.
And it's the fans.
And the fans they're sacrosanct, whatever they say, that's the way it's gonna be, right?
Same thing in a poll.
Let's just forget it.
Not even play the game.
Back to the phones.
We go on open line Friday uh to the Bronx next.
This Robert, great to have you, sir, on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Uh first off, I love the two of IT, by the way.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I just um I just got a note from Catherine, who uh just tuned in via the Ditto Cam.
She said it looks like a tea ghetto in here, as I have so many bottles around.
So I've shuffled some and uh moved some out of the way.
Have you tasted the the latest uh flavors, the peach or the blueberry?
Uh I have the blueberry.
Oh I love it.
Oh, it's like it's like drinking blueberry muffin batter.
Yep, and you were right.
You said when you open the the cap you can actually smell the blueberries, and it's very tricky.
Oh, it is just stunning.
I'm gonna do it right now.
In fact, I got one.
That's one of these bottles I had to move.
Okay.
Oh, I tell you, that is just what an aroma.
I'm glad you mentioned that.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah, good stuff.
Rush, I I guess bottom line, uh I'm confused.
Well, confusion and fear, I guess.
I know that John McCain is a Republican moderate, supporting Romney this time.
And Chris Christie is a conservative.
I know Romney has flip-flopped on issues and claims, underlining claims, to be a conservative.
So there's my confusion.
Um I I fear once elected, if that is to happen.
Romney will become John McCain of course, you know, uh reaching across the aisle.
Lot of people, blah, blah, blah.
May I ask you, and I'm I'm look at not being provocative.
Really, there's there's no wrong answer here.
I would like to know why you think that.
And a lot of people tell me they're worried about Romney, eh, he's not conservative, Russia can end up being just like McCain or Nixon.
Why do you think that?
What has he said or done?
Well, I guess, you know, I've I've heard a lot of the the you know, commercials uh i against him, I guess, because I've always been a a newt uh supporter.
And uh you know, I it's it's documented.
I I believe that uh, you know, he has he has Changed his mind and in you know many, many ways, and uh but you can't give me one.
Uh I'm sorry, I'm not sure.
I know it's tough.
I put you on the spot, and I don't I don't mean to be doing bad, please.
I'm I'm just people tell me a lot, they think Newt is or uh Romney's a flip flopper like John Kerry wasn't.
I mean, he's gonna be saying one thing here when he gets to the White House and turn into a moderate, uh, and so forth.
And I can think of things like 2006 or 7 Romney uh in Massachusetts.
I'm not a conservative Republican, I'm a moderate.
Well, people hear that okay, he's telling us the truth.
Romney says, no, I'm in Massachusetts.
Yeah, I did say that, but I don't mean it anymore.
Right.
Um and so we're left with what?
We gotta which which Romney we're gonna believe.
Therefore, that's why you say flip flopper.
Yes.
Yes.
But Newton Newt Newt um has changed you're a new guy, Newt's been all over the board.
Newt believes in man-made global warming, but's trying to cover it up.
Yeah.
Newt sat down on the couch with Pelosi.
Right.
Christie.
Christie is uh you think he's a big conservative because he's really, really tough on the unions, but is he really the full-fledged conservative that you think?
The the egg you you basically want to know why are these guys on board with Romney?
Christie thing is a big conservative and McCain, why are they on board with Romney and say this proves that Romney is like a McCain, and therefore you're what's Christie doing?
The answer to your question is nothing to do with what you've asked me.
They're all Republicans, they're all part of the Republican establishment, and the word's gone out from on high.
Our choice from the powers that be in the Republican Party is Romney.
And so if you're a governor, let's say you're Nikki Haley.
This stuff matters.
This is reality.
You're Nikki Haley, you're a Tea Party governor.
The Tea Party gets you elected governor of South Carolina.
But you've got this onerous Obamacare bill staring you in the face, and you know it's gonna kill your state if you are forced to live under it.
So here's Romney saying the first thing he's gonna do is repeal it.
If Nikki Haley decides I'm gonna buck the party, I'm gonna nominate somebody party doesn't want, she has just ostracized herself from the party, and there goes her chance to maybe get VEP.
There goes her chance to maybe get a cabinet post if she wants one, there goes her.
I'm not saying she does, I'm just saying all businesses have a ladder of success in them, and there are certain rungs that you have to climb to get to the top.
And when politics, once the party has chosen its candidate, if you are in the party and if you are a party person, you must support the nominee.
Why do you think after every bruising primary?
For example, why in the world would Romney want to be seen with McCain after what McCain did to Romney in 2008?
Romney was taken out by Huckabee and by McCain in the real world.
He doesn't like them, he doesn't want to do with them, and he liked the screw him.
That's you and me in the real world.
But in politics, he's their best buddy.
He will take their support, he'll go on stage with them.
That's party politics.
And you and you put all that stuff that happened in 2008, you throw it away, you put it aside, you forget it, until you have an opportunity to get even somehow, so it may take ten or fifteen years.
You don't do it publicly or what have you.
It's it's it's it's uh I'm sorry, but that's the explanation for it.
Right.
It really and don't don't you in in the real world, I mean, if I'm if I'm Mitt Romney and and I'm making real tracks in 2008 and I'm getting close, and then all of a sudden uh McCain and Huckabee team up against me, and they get the governor of Florida to team up against them, uh with them against me.
Right.
How do you four years later become best buds with people that destroyed your career four years ago or destroyed your chance then?
But it happens all the time in politics.
Yeah.
It happens.
Yep.
If Chris Christie doesn't support Romney, um then he's got one choice.
He better become so untouchably popular on his own that the party can't stop him, like Reagan did.
What look at Reagan?
This is a great example.
George W. George H.W. Bush, 76 and 80, literally tried to destroy Ronald Reagan's political career.
Voodoo economics.
Guess who ends up being on the vice presidential ticket?
George H.W. Bush.
That's right.
It's party politics.
Where ideology doesn't triumph.
Well, I don't know.
Romney the old man, I don't know.
George Romney, I don't know if he ran against I don't know if he ran against Reagan or not.
I don't know.
What's that got to do with anything?
You're just trying to show off your memory about George Romney.
Nobody's talking about George Romney snurely.
Nobody cares about George Romney.
In the middle here of explaining to a caller who had a terribly important question, you bring up George Romney to me.
This is why they don't have microphones, folks.
Anyway, does that does that help?
But very, very last question is about these debates.
How much importance, you know, to the American people do you put into these debates?
Because, you know, going back to Newt, I I believe that he's a superb debater.
And and uh again, against President Obama, I believe he would beat him up senseless.
Right.
A lot of people do.
A lot of people do.
Right.
I am of the scruel of thought that presidential debates, barring some really huge gaffe, don't change that many votes.
Significantly change that many votes.
Really?
Yep.
And I see that you've you've hit on something else, too.
I know for a fact that a lot of Republicans are simply trying to find the person they think is the most articulate and well spoken and smartest.
Because they're sick and tired of having people with accents who can't put three syllables together as their nominee or as their candidate.
They're sick of it, and they're sick of the media laughing at their nominee or their candidates are being stupid.
They're tired of it, they're tired of liberals laughing at them, and especially when they have to sit there and listen how smart Obama is, a guy destroying the country.
So a lot of people really would have their lives made if somebody would just destroy Obama in a debate to hell with the election.
If somebody just destroys Obama, I mean in a score.
Yeah, just make Obama look like an absolute blithering idiot.
That's all that they'd be happy as they could be, wouldn't care who won the election.
And if I've described you, you know who you are.
A lot of people out there, look and I know how this is.
I I go to California and I run into all these arrogant liberals, and back back during the uh Bush years, all I heard was how stupid the guy was.
Just how stupid he was.
As though that that's all that mattered to them.
They loved talking about and making fun of how stupid George W. Bush was.
Now stupid it was when he talked.
And therefore, that disqualified what he was doing in the Iraq War, and that disqualified any policy.
Bush is stupid.
And our voters don't want a nominee about whom that can be said.
Pure and simple.
I understand all this.
That's why I am who I am.
Okay, snurtly, George Romney did not run against Reagan.
I checked.
He was running against Nixon when his campaign began to collapse after he was I was brainwashed in Vietnam statement.
Reagan came along later.
It was Nixon he was running against.
Now the I I got an email uh during the breaks.
Why is this intelligence business?
Somebody is worried about the debates mattering so much.
Somebody was just terribly concerned, and and I I appreciate this, by the way, this this notion that we have to nominate somebody who can win a debate.
I don't think that's how this election is going to be won.
This is an election about ideas, not debate skills.
But I know people disagree with me.
The reason people, conservative, the reason people on our side care about this so much is very simple.
Conservatism is an idea with multiple subsets of ideas.
Conservatism requires basic speaking and communication skills to explain it.
And to contrast it with liberalism.
In addition to that, people have to be able to complete thoughts and get those ideas across.
When you are in the ideas business, you had better be able to communicate them.
What I would submit to most of you who think that recent Republican presidential nominees have been stupid or inarticulate is really not what they've been.
They haven't been full-fledged conservative.
They have when it's in your heart, it pours out of you.
When it's not, and you're having to fake it, that's going to create pauses and insecurity, uh unsureedness and so forth.
But if you I don't ever have a problem explaining conservatives.
I don't care who I'm talking to.
But I would probably be a little halting if I were trying to make somebody think I was a moderate.
I'd have to stop and think about it.
When you stop and think about it, you look stupid.
Unless you've mastered the facial expressions of looking thoughtful.
Well, that's Snerdley just said that's not fair for me to say this because I could make anything interesting.
No, I can only make the things I care about interesting.
You don't want to hear me talk about something I don't care about.
I will bore you to tears.
That's why I've always believed that passion is the giant magnet.
It is passion.
You talk about bowling, and if you do it passionately, you will attract people like a magnet to it.
They may be laughing themselves silly that you care so much about bowling or whatever it is, but you'll still have them.
You know, passion is the ingredient.
But my only point is conservatism, we're party of ideas.
Gotta be able to communicate them.
You have to feel them.
They have to be in your heart.
And when they're not, you have to stop and think about, okay, well, what should I say here?
I've got to make those conservatives really believe I'm a conservative.
And then you're gonna make mistakes and you're going to, and then the conservative is gonna say, see, he's not really conservative, the modern is a flip-flopper, and they'll be right.
Or when the person halts, pauses to think about what the next sentence ought to be.
Stupid Candy just can't even remember what he was saying, lost his place.
What an idiot.
The lack of commitment to it manifests itself as something other than what it really is.
In many cases, it's um it's stupid.
Well, open line Friday could be an opportunity for you to listen to me talk about what I don't care about.
But so far that hasn't happened today.
We haven't yet had a call about something I don't care about.
It happens.
It happens.
In fact, I I should tell Snyder, we should we should do an experiment here.
I'll show you what I'm talking about.
Well, folks, there are things you could bring up today that would tick me off so much that I've you I can convince you I'm a mean guy by virtue of my reaction to it, just because I wouldn't want to I don't know what it is, I'm just I have my pet peeves too.
I get frustrated at stuff.
I'm just I'm just saying here that sounding smart is something that can be accomplished with just passion and belief in ideas, particularly ours.
If you don't have that, and you're trying to fake it, you're gonna raise questions about your intelligence, your commitment or what have you.
I think that's largely what's going on.
Do we have time here to we do?
Sh.
Well, no, then This next call wants to talk about the Marines and the Euro Nation on the Taliban, and they're really not, there's not enough time.
Actually, not enough time to be fair or unfair to uh to anybody.
I do want to make a quick point before we hit the uh the break.
You know, Obama had his big press confite appearance yesterday on insourcing and jobs and so forth.
And the U.S. Chamber of Commerce had a great rejoinder to it.
Hey, Mr. President, you missed the biggest in sourcing opportunity that's come down your pike in three years, the Keystone Pipeline.
You want to insource jobs?
How about authorizing the Keystone Pipeline?
It's a great point.
And the reason it's a great point because Obama is not about insourcing jobs.
Brief timeout, folks, be right back.
Don't go away.
Another exciting hour of broadcast excellence, hosted by me, America's real anchor man, El Rushbow, now in the can, and soon to be in preparation for posting at the Limbaugh Broadcast Museum, which is at Rush Limbaugh.com.
It is a fabulous, a forerunner of what's going to exist someday, perhaps.
The virtual Limbaugh Broadcast Museum at Rushlimbaugh.com.
If you haven't seen this, you should.
Whole website, in fact.
▲
Export Selection