All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 10, 2012 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:53
January 10, 2012, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, the establishment Republicans are uh they're feeling the heat today.
Everybody hitting them by virtue of the fact that Romney is being hit.
And I mean, Romney is the establishment candidate, and everybody to one day except Santorum.
Sandorms are taking it easy on the TARP aspect here, but uh I mean, San Torum's doing good cop to rom to Newt's bad cop when it when it comes to Romney, but Perry's out there uh hitting him, and the media today is hitting Romney.
Um, Henry and Mitchell and me seen here from Washington just speculated that Romney's unforced errors may hurt him in New Hampshire.
Now, the unforced errors are gee, I love firing people and explaining profits, and so forth.
So we're now in the in the middle of a debate over who is and who isn't a real capitalist on the uh on the Republican side.
So in that regard, just a couple of thoughts here before we get to the audio sound bites into your phone calls.
Now, Romney supported TARP in his book, No Apology, Romney says that the TARP program was intended to prevent a run on virtually every bank and financial institution in the country, and he says it did, in fact, keep our economy from total meltdown.
But he also, in the book, criticizes Obama's Treasury Secretary, little Timmy Geitner, for using TARP as a slush fund.
Under Geithner, the program was as poorly explained, poorly understood, poorly structured, poorly implemented as any legislation or recent memory, Romney wrote.
His final word of the subject should be shut down.
Now, I don't think you can't have it both ways.
You can't say at the outset that it was there to save a virtual worldwide economic collapse, and then, after having said that, say it needs to be shut down.
If TARP was successful as its proponents tell us, then why in the Sam Hill is there an economic crisis in Europe?
Because in addition to TARP, don't forget that the Federal Reserve, and at the time nobody knew who, but the Federal Reserve had lent or given or what two trillion dollars before TARP was 800 billion.
Well, close to one trillion anyway, but the Fed had given out, lent whatever two trillion, it wouldn't at the time tell us who got the money.
Now, here's the way it was explained to us.
George W. Bush and the White House minding his own business.
And the timing of this, how coincidental, right as the thrust of the presidential campaign begins.
Right, we get into September and October, and lo and behold, the Treasury Secretary, Paulson, a Chuck Schumer guy, goes to Bush and says we got 72 hours.
If we don't come up with $800 billion to bail out so-and-so and whoever, I can't guarantee that the world economy won't collapse.
What do you do if your president of your Treasury Secretary comes and tells you that?
What do you do?
And you uh you bring McCain, you tell McCain about it, McCain's, all right, that's sure.
I should spend my campaign.
Let's just spend the campaign, and we'll come back to Washington, and we'll discuss it.
And Obama goes too.
And then the news comes out that Obama took over the meeting in the White House.
Bush convenes a meeting in his cabinet room.
Obama comes in as a candidate, and the story comes out that Obama took over the meeting and told everybody what was going on, uh, ran the meeting, nobody else knew what was going on.
We got social act.
That was a biggest snow job because after a year and a year and a half went by, there was still two to three hundred billion dollars of unspent TARP money.
We'd also learned that a number of bank CEOs were commanded to appear in a locked room at the Treasury Department of Paulson made them take TARP money.
Made them sign a piece of paper, even those who didn't want it.
The Wells Fargo CEO specifically said, I don't need it.
My bank isn't in trouble.
I don't want to have to take 50 billion or whatever it was they were forcing him to take.
Paulson made them all take it so that there would be the appearance of unity and system-wide problems.
And we the story is, and I happen to believe it, that Paulson told them he wasn't letting them out of that room until they all signed.
They went in there at three o'clock in the afternoon, and he didn't let them out till six.
Now, this was happening.
You will remember that we stopped this for two weeks.
They told us this had to be done in 24 hours, and we delayed it for two weeks.
And in that process, I remember all of us saying, wait a minute, what is the emergency?
They said we had to do this in 72 hours or we're cooked.
It took two weeks to get it done.
Romney supported TARP.
Santorum has been defending Romney over Bain, so has Ron Paul.
Romney said that TARP should be shut down in December 2009.
He praised it in March of 2009.
McCain was ahead in the polls by about 15 points on September 15, 2008, the next day the financial crisis began.
It was ahead by a couple points in a couple of polls.
Not 15, it was like seven or eight points.
McCain was up.
Then this hit.
And then we were told that the world economy would collapse if we didn't do this.
And all of our self-appointed geniuses who were trying to burn Newt at the stake a couple of weeks ago, also supported TARP.
It's hard to find people who didn't.
I remember I went, I had to go to my hometown of Cape Girardo, Missouri, a courthouse was being dedicated in the name of my grandfather.
And the senator, one of the senators from Missouri was their Kit Bond.
And there was a there was a dinner the night before the big ceremony of name the courthouse dedicated.
And I was dubious about this, and I took him inside.
I said, Senator, is this really?
Oh, yeah, oh, oh, I'll tell you this is bad.
Oh, this is horrible.
If we don't do something about, oh, I can't, future of the world's at stake.
Oh, okay.
That's what they were told, and these people bought it.
And all it was, as we look back, all TARP was.
There was certainly nothing capitalistic about it, and it was something, nothing capitalistic about the failure of the U.S. economy.
Capitalism was not in play.
The subprime mortgage crisis had no relationship to capitalism.
Capitalism would not permit the subprime mortgage crisis.
Capitalism does not permit the bailout of failed institution after failed institution, which is what TARP was.
It was the biggest bailout of failed businesses in the history of this country, and it ended up being nothing more than a massive slush fund.
And all of these people that are ripping into Romney or whoever now for being anti-capitalist so forth, they didn't care that TARP was anti-capitalist then.
You know, all these all these people standing up and defending capitalism today didn't care a whit about it when it was under siege with the subprime mortgage crisis and didn't care a whit about it when TARP was proposed.
TARP, what was what is a bailout?
A bailout is nothing more than wealth redistribution, and this was with taxpayer dollars.
This is before Obama's porculus.
By the total here, we're looking at 1.8 trillion dollars of slush funds redistribution that took place inside of six months, all set up by a phony economic crisis.
Well, not phony, but but what was phony was the severity of it.
In terms of if we don't do this, The world economy collapses in 72 hours.
That was bogus.
So we bailed out big banks, in some cases, banks that did not want to be bailed out.
Sovereign wealth funds of foreign countries all on the backs of American taxpayers.
They said it simply had to be done.
There was no time to stand up for things like principle.
There was no time to worry about the moral hazards here.
There was no time to even really dig deep and get the details and have us be uh told exactly why this needed to be done.
No, no, there wasn't time.
It was a crisis like every damn thing that has happened in this country the last four years, it has been a crisis that we cannot afford to wait on.
TARP was the first one, the stimulus was the next one.
Now it goes without saying in all the great investigations and fixes that followed.
There has been no accountability of anybody who supported TARP.
Not a single bit of it.
Even after everything we said about TARP proved to be true, even after it was used by Paulson and Geithner and Obama as a piggy bank to reward their friends.
Don't for a minute think that Cylindra didn't get some money from the TARP slush fund.
Even after it ended up being used as a slush fund, even after it was used as a bailout so Paulson's buddies could hold on to their houses in the Hamptons and so forth.
We heard the argument, it's too big to fail, Mr. Limbaugh.
We can't let these things do.
And that argument, too big to fail, is still with us.
Too big to fail is still something that we are hit with.
So if disaster strikes again, and there's Greece lurking out there, and all of Europe, and if TARP was to fix this and prevent it, it hasn't worked, has it?
Because we're being told the same thing now.
Another crisis.
The world economy is nearing collapse.
Look what's happening in Europe.
The Germans are gonna have to bail out the Greeks, and if they don't, all hell's gonna break loose.
European Union, the Euro, too big to fail.
We can't allow this to happen.
So if Greece goes belly up and starts taking Europe down with it, guess what we're gonna be told?
It's too big to fail.
We can't let this happen.
So would Romney give us TARP too?
If Romney's elected and the powers that be in the financial community walk into his office and tell him what they told Bush.
Mr. President, we got 72 hours here, and it's really bad.
You think we'd get TARP too?
I bet we would, and all the same geniuses would be saying once again that this is something we just have to do.
We don't have time to think about it, we don't have time to explain it.
This is a crisis.
It is an emergency.
The world economy hangs in the balance.
Same technique they use every time we need to extend the debt limit.
Every time Obama wants to spend another trillion dollars, what are we told?
It's crisis.
It's an emergency.
We don't have time for debate.
We don't have time for the usual congressional hearings.
We don't have time for the usual congressional test.
We don't have time.
So I said yesterday, you know, there are ideas, and then there are people that are governed by them, and there are people that are inspired by them, people that get into politics because they want to advance ideas, but I'm telling you, at the same time, there are people who get into this strictly solely to have access to all this money.
Much easier than having to work for it, and the amounts that you can take and have allocated to you are far greater than what you can convince somebody to pay you.
September 25th, 2008.
Gingrich appeared on Fox News and said that the TARP legislation was socialism, said that it should be defeated.
That's September 25th.
On September 28th, Gingrich was on this week on ABC.
Said the question was not whether something needed to be done, but whether it needed to be TARP, whether it needed to be done the next 48 hours.
He then stated that he would probably reluctantly Vote for it, but so everybody got captured by it.
Then on October 1st of 2008, Gingrich wrote in Human Events that his solution would be to get rid of Secretary Paulson and to suspend the market to market rule, which would give Congress the breathing room to develop a plan to replace TARP and to reestablish trust with the American people.
So Gingrich was opposed to TARP.
Romney, everybody was for it.
TARP is not capitalism.
Romney, we're being told, is the big capitalist.
He supported the biggest bailout of banks and sovereign wealth funds.
So my point is all of these allegations going back and forth about who's a capitalist and who isn't, who's willing to defend it.
The way it's manifested itself now.
The establishment's candidate is under assault for being a capitalist.
His opponents are running around using the language of the left to attack him as a capitalist.
Now what are they going to do?
They're going to defend capitalism?
Somebody better.
Because whatever's happening to Romney now, whoever our nominee is, you can you can quadruple this.
Terms of the allegations.
What a Republican is, a conservative is mean spirited, loves big profits, love big business, take money from the poor, give it to the bankers, all of that crap.
It's going to be, it's going to be magnified twice what it is in the Republican primary right now.
Meanwhile, in the Oval Office, we have a genuine redistributionist Marxist.
And our establishment will not get anywhere near properly characterizing him that way.
You know my job is to communicate, to make the complex understandable.
And I just want you to understand.
I'm not defending Bain.
I'm not defending Romney, I'm not defending Newt, I'm not defending Santorum.
I am defending capitalism and conservatism.
And we are seeing, because this has happened, we are seeing in microcosm form the Obama campaign against our nominee in one regard.
This is going to be, and it's going to be much more amplified than this is.
For all the language Newt's using, and uh whoever the others are attacking Romney for profits and firing people so forth.
Wait till the Democrats get hold of this.
This is mild compared to what it's going to be.
So it's a good proving ground.
But this is the time to stand up for capitalism to explain it when everybody's paying attention.
This is the time to define it, to illustrate, explain what it means.
This is the time to stand up and say, if you allow people to pursue profit and earn profit, you never need tarp.
If you let people pursue profit, if you let people pursue self-interest, if you let people try to manufacture and sell products and services that a mass number of people want, you will never need to bail them out.
But if you let liberals in charge of everything and you put obstacles and regulations and taxes in front of innovators and risk takers, and if they fail because of it, you're either going to let them fail and feel bad, or you're going to have a call to bail them out.
And we know that the money changers, power brokers, whoever, the people that run Washington and have access to that money are going to bail out their friends first.
And that's not you and me.
But if you let people pursue, you just let capitalism take hold.
You don't need TARP.
And capitalism has a very functional aspect to it.
Businesses fail.
It's the result of people doing something they shouldn't be doing, doing it in a bad way, making a mistake.
It's the result of people not wanting the product, not wanting a service.
It fails.
If it fails, you go back, you try it again, try to get it right.
Some succeed.
Well, where we are right now is the people who succeed are suspects.
The people who succeed are somehow villains.
And the people that fail are the ones who are virtuous.
The people that fail are the ones who've been taken advantage of, who've been screwed, who've been ripped off.
No, they're just not as good.
So we're going to end up propping up mediocrity rather than encouraging excellence in everybody.
And then you need TARP.
And then you need stimulus.
And then you need bailouts.
Because it makes everybody feel better and it's fair.
But you don't have capitalism when all that's going on.
Now, why is this happening?
On the Republican side, I'll tell you exactly why it's happening.
This is how Romney hopes to win.
This is the end result of a strategy.
Mitt Romney has spent a fortune in two election cycles, attacking the records of people who are more conservative than he is by claiming they are not conservative.
And he's attacking them from the right.
Now, what outrages Newt and the others in the past, the people back in 2008, is that Romney is not Mr. Conservative.
But he's positioning himself that way and attacking others for not being.
Newt, I guarantee if you ask him, Newt thinks he's twice the conservative Romney is.
So here's Newt being hit up and ripped for not being a conservative by a guy he doesn't think is anywhere near as big a conservative as he is.
I mean, imagine if you were on the end of millions of dollars of attack ads in opposition research, and you think all of it's a bunch of lies.
What are you going to do?
You're going to try to retaliate.
So that's where we are.
This campaign is where it is because decisions were made by certain candidates to take it here.
So it has to be dealt with as is.
And we will be back.
Speaking of TARP, Newt, he really nailed it in his human events piece 2008, October 1st.
Let me give you a brief excerpt of what Newt wrote then.
He said the TARP plan that relies on the former chairman of Goldman Sachs, that would be Paulson, presiding over disbursing hundreds of billions of dollars to Wall Street is a terrible concept, and inevitably will lead to crony capitalism and the appearance of, if not the actual existence of corruption.
Well, that happened.
That's exactly what TARP was.
So now Newt and Perry are attacking Romney from the left.
Like Obama.
This is so simple.
We got a Marxist in the White House, come up with a conservative nominee, run a campaign, win in a landslide, and save the country.
And instead, what happened?
The establishment Republicans get scared to death of conservatives, thinking it's going to result in a gold water landslide.
And they figure Obama can't be beat anyway.
So let's find a moderate that doesn't tick off the independence.
Let's try to win the Senate and get ourselves in charge of the chairmanships and the money, and we'll call it a day.
And any conservative that got in the race, the establishment set out to destroy.
That's where we are.
That's why all this is happening.
Because they got a bunch of people in a Republican establishment who don't think the Marxists in the White House can be beat anyway, and really care more about getting themselves in charge of the money than anything else.
And they do not share our view that the country's future is in peril.
They don't.
That's where we are.
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
Let me illustrate some of what I've said.
We'll start with Newt.
This was on Fox and Friends this morning.
The co-host, the weather guy, Steve Ducey.
So I was driving around yesterday in my car, and like every other American, I was listening to Rush, and he was talking about you and how you've gone after Romney and Bain Capitol.
He said you're using the language of the left to beat up Romney over Bain.
He said it makes him uncomfortable because that's what the left is going to do if Romney's a nominee.
I don't think I'm using the language of the left.
I'm using the language of classic American populism.
Main Street has always been suspicious of Wall Street.
Small businesses have always worried about big businesses.
People have a natural concern when they see financiers come in from out of town, take over a company, uh, take all the profits, and then leave people unemployed behind.
But There's a big difference between people who go out to create a company, even if they fail, if they try in the right direction, if they share in the hardships, if they're out there with the workers doing it together.
That's one thing.
But if somebody who's very wealthy comes in, takes over your company, takes out all the cash and leaves behind the unemployment.
I think that's not a model we want to advocate, and I don't think any conservative wants to get caught defending that kind of model.
Well, but that's not the model.
That's not what happens.
But see, this this is why uh my old buddy Jay Nordlinger in Impromptus at National Review is pulling his hair out.
And why a lot of because this this that is language of the left.
I know you could you could say that that Newt actually compounded this and made it worse with with the with these comments on Fox this morning.
Um small business have always worried about big business.
Main Street's always been suspicious of Wall Street.
People have a natural concern.
They see financiers come in from out of town, take over a company, take all the profits and leave unemployment behind.
My gosh, that's what the people who indict capitalism say.
that So it does uh it continues to make me uncomfortable.
The next answer, the question came from Gretchen Carlson.
She said, Well, what constitutes acceptable capitalist behavior then in your mind?
To put in 30 million and get back 60 million would be a fabulous return.
To put in 30 million and get back 90 million would be a fabulous return.
Did they really need to take out 180 million?
If leaving 30 or 40 million behind, the company would have survived, the people would have been employed, the jobs would have been there.
I just think that Romney's gonna have to have a press conference and walk through case by case the places.
These are not places where they lost money when a company went broke.
These are places where they made money while a company went broke.
How do you translate that?
You want me to show you how you translate that?
Here's how you translate that.
Audio somebody number four, Mr. Broadcast Engineer.
Here's how you translate what Newt just said.
I do think at a certain point you've made enough money.
But you know, that part of the American way is, you know, you can just keep on making it if you're providing a good product or you're providing good service.
Yeah, but that's not.
We don't want that.
At some point you've made enough, and we're gonna be the ones that say so.
And then we're gonna have you appear to press conference, defend yourself, have make it too much money.
That's what we're gonna do.
And then after you defend yourself, we're gonna take it.
Because you don't need that much.
We're gonna decide how much you need.
Um the way Newt's talking here, I've never heard him speak this way before, I must tell you.
And and the way he's speaking, this sounds like left-wing social engineering.
Does it not?
When I have to play an audio sound by from Barack Obama to translate what Newt said about Romney and Bain.
What's the number of companies that Bain went in there took over?
There was this kind of it was two out of a hundred and some odd.
You know, I guess it's time for some full disclosure here.
Bain Capital uh is is one of how do I phrase this?
My former syndication partner was clear channel communications.
Clear channel communications was taken over, bought out by Bain Capital and another uh private equity firm.
So Bain Capital would safely be said is my syndication partner here.
Used to be Clear Channel.
I've never met anybody at Main.
I've never talked to them.
They're not that's that's they're they're distant, so forth, but I need to mention this just in the interest of full-fledged under percent disclosure.
But I can tell you that this has not happened here.
Every EIB employee, nobody has yet come to me and said you got to get rid of It just has not happened.
But when you have to, when you have to play.
By the way, this happened long after Romney.
Romney has nothing to do with Bain now.
So Romney's not part of this.
Don't misunderstand.
But when you have to play Obama to translate what Newt just said, basically, well, I think Romney was it's okay they made that much, and then maybe it's okay made that much, but at that point, nobody needs to make that much.
180 million.
No, you don't need you can leave some of that in there and not fire a bunch of people and uh and what have you.
See, well, it's none of his business.
It's it's none of the government's business.
This this stuff, if you just leave it alone, it'll all shake out.
Um you could have rid read this in uh in an Occupy Wall Street flyer.
Uh I know.
I know a lot of people don't think Newt should have taken a million dollars, whatever it was in Fannie Mayor Freddie Mac.
That was too much.
He didn't need that much.
Um left the mortgages standing.
I know.
I know.
Where does this stuff stop once you start going down this uh this slope?
So here is an ad.
Newt's got some super PAC money now.
Let's put it.
There is a super PAC now for Newt.
We gotta be very careful because the candidates are not allowed to have any contact with the super PAC.
And I don't want to be misunderstood saying that there has been between Newton and his.
This this Newt Super PAC has got an ad running out there on a YouTube channel called Winning Our Future.
We've got the audio, it's about 21 seconds.
Here it is.
A story of greed.
Playing the system for a quick bug.
A group of corporate raiders led by Mitt Romney.
More ruthless than Wall Street.
For tens of thousands of Americans, the suffering began.
When Mitt Romney came to town.
It's...
It's funny on the radio, listen.
The suffering began.
Music stop.
When Mitt Romney came to town.
The suffering began.
A group of corporate raiders.
I've the left could not improve on this.
Yeah.
Hey, you people at the nude pack, you need to add a line.
You need to add Romney saying, I love being able to fire people.
At the end of this ad.
The suffering began when Mitt Romney came to.
I'm Mitt Romney and I love firing people.
Why don't you close the loop?
And make this ad really good.
Now then they brought forth, this is not all that's in the ad.
Then they brought forth a parade of victims.
Little old ladies whose lives were ruined by Mitt Romney.
Mitt Romney became CEO of Bain Capital the day the company was formed.
His mission to reap massive rewards for himself and his investors.
Mitt Romney and them guys, they don't care who I am.
He's for small businesses.
No, he isn't.
He's not.
And that hurt so bad to leave my home.
Because of one man that's got 15 homes.
You gotta.
At David Axelrod's shop, they're listening to this stuff.
They're looking at these ads and saying, man, these Republicans are good.
These Republicans are great at playing the class envy game.
Of course they can use it.
Of course they can use it.
They can use fair use.
Take a 10-second excerpt of it.
At least I'll say this.
At least Romney knows how many homes he's got.
McCain didn't, If you recall.
Of course, this is not unprecedented, uh, ladies and gentlemen.
George H.W. Bush.
Once referred to Ronald Reagan's economic policies as voodoo economics.
So it's uh not unprecedented.
Uh a number of comebacks that Romney could use.
Yeah, I like firing people, but I never fired a wife on her deathbed.
No, no, I know that that's not what Newt did, but we're talking political ads.
You can say anything.
Uh the New York Times is there were two companies that that uh Bain took over that this kind of thing happened out of over the hundred and fifty that that Bain took out.
The New York Times is writing about those two, and it's those two that Newt is discussing here.
Then Newt wants Romney to do a uh a press conference to explain all this.
But uh again, uh folks, uh uh this there's a reason we're here.
There was uh I told I told you yesterday that that that well last week I told you uh after Romney took Gingrich out in Iowa, this was totally predictable.
Totally.
One hundred percent predictable.
And as Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz is she's up there on MSNBC, she's salivating on actually to wipe the saliva off the corners of her mouth.
Uh she can't wait till they put together their ad where Romney says he likes firing people.
But again, isn't that what we want in somebody?
Let's go to the phones.
Let's uh people have been waiting patiently.
We haven't been to a phone call yet.
We're gonna start Portland, Oregon.
It's a Chauncy.
Great to have you, and I really appreciate your patience.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
Wow.
Um, here's what I have to say.
Rush, I just I really don't understand you today.
I mean, I I'm getting really sick of all the negativity.
I'm about to turn off Fox and turn off everybody.
Yep.
I want to hear us build up our candidates.
I'm I'm part of the one percent economically.
I'm a Mormon, and Mitten, Romney's my last choice.
Well, I draw on Paul.
And I I want to hear people built up because we have one objective, and it's to get Obama out of our lives.
And and all you're doing to me today is confusing me.
All you're doing is making me feel negative about everybody.
Uh no, I'm not making you feel negative.
They are.
I'm just I'm I'm I'm just I'm telling you what they're all saying.
I'm trying to explain why and what it means, and I'm being very critical of it myself.
Well, my my message today would be let's let them duke it out.
Let's just stand on the sidelines and let them say whatever they're gonna say, let them vet each other.
Well, I they are and then get behind who is ever the nominee.
I don't care who it is.
I absolutely don't care.
I want Obama out of my life.
Well, I so we all do.
We discuss the news on this program, and and and the news today is the candidates are not building each other up in the news.
They're they're tearing each other down.
Right.
In the news today.
All right, well, that would be my message to the candidates.
Let's just focus on Obama.
They've tried.
I mean, they did how many how many of these debates have there been where we have praised them for going after Obama?
That's it's been going on since the outset.
That one of the highlights of this campaign has been that during each of the debates, at some point, a candidate stands, okay.
Stop this.
The real opponent is Obama, and we all agree Obama must be defeated.
That's happened at every debate.
We have reached new territory here.
I just want you to be positive.
I want you to to to positively build up.
I started out positive.
I told you before I got into any of this Republican stuff.
I gave you the lay of the land as it relates to Obama.
He's not sitting pretty despite all of this.
No, he anybody knew yourself say anybody can defeat him.
Anyone should be able to defeat this guy.
We shouldn't care what he thinks.
We shouldn't care what the White House thinks, that the left thinks what they say who they think their perfect candidate is.
It's irrelevant.
I don't know what are you talking.
I didn't I'm talking about polling data, which shows that people, when asked what do they fear most about this year, by two to one said Obama being re-elected.
Yeah, but but you you've gone on and on about how you know what the left thinks about Romney being the perfect candidate.
Who cares?
No, I've gone on and on about what Newt thinks of Romney as a candidate.
Okay, my friend.
I love you.
You still do?
Of course.
What are you talking about?
You call here to rip me to shreds.
Say that I'm a worthless host that I'm not worth listening to anymore.
You tell me you still love me.
I'm just sick of the I'm just sick of the negativity.
I just want to hear we're gonna take this guy out big.
We're gonna take over Congress.
I still think we are.
I the election we're held today, he loses in a landslide, despite all this.
This is all happening for a reason, a series of them.
And I've tried to explain to you why, as a way to partially mollify, partially explain it, but uh there's nothing I can do to stop this.
I mean, I could, I can say I I okay, I could I could issue a commandment to Perry and Newt and Romney to stop this.
That we've had enough.
Okay, we get it.
But not yet.
It's too much fun.
You know, you could uh these that Newt the Newt pack, got an idea for you guys.
Recut your ads on Romney.
And your tagline is I am Barack Obama and I approve of this message.
Put that at the end of your ad.
I'm considering what to do about this, folks.
I know it's serious.
Sit tight.
▲
Export Selection