All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 21, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:54
October 21, 2011, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
You see that Senate Democrats have voted for more women to get raped.
And Senate Democrats also voted for more murders.
Senate Democrats voted down Obama's anti-rape and anti-murder bill.
Senate Democrats voted against a $35 billion bill that would have prevented rape.
So we never heard from rapists yesterday about what they were scared or not.
Maybe we'll hear from some today.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's Open Line Friday.
Open Line Friday.
Yip, yip, yip, yip, yahoo.
One of the greatest career risks ever taken by a major media figure.
We take it every Friday.
We allow rank amateurs unfettered airtime to control the content of the program whenever we go to the phones.
Very few limitations on callers on Friday.
Not the case Monday through Thursday, but it is on Friday.
You know the rules by now.
So here we go.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
The email address lrushball at EIBnet.com.
If you were not with us in a third hour yesterday, as you know, Vice President Bite Me has been ratcheting this up.
He's running from Flint, Michigan to any number of places, trying to convince the American people to pass or to support the passage of the president's jobs bill, $35 billion jobs bill, so you can hire more cops and more firefighters and more teachers.
Because if we don't do that, there are going to be more rapes.
There are going to be more rapes in Flint, Michigan.
There are going to be more rapes everywhere.
And of course, this is pathently outrageous and ridiculous.
But I thought we would go about it in a different way.
Obviously, this meant that the nation's rapists and purse snatchers and murderers would be eagerly watching the Senate vote today.
We even speculated they might be watching C-SPAN.
So we asked to put out a call yesterday to murderers and rapists to call here and tell us if you're worried what you plan on doing.
For example, if the jobs bill goes down to defeat, if the Democrats vote it down, which they did, are you going to go commit more rapes?
Or on the other hand, if the bill passes, are you going to commit fewer rapes?
Are you waiting for the Senate vote on this?
Because the vice president's made it sound.
I made it sound.
I mean, he's assured, he has predicted, he has confirmed that if this thing doesn't pass, that there will be more rapes, not just in Flint, Michigan, but everywhere.
And who better to ask than rapists?
NASI put out the call for rapists yesterday to call in.
We didn't get any.
Snurdley is asking me now.
It's Open Line Friday if the offer still holds.
It's Open Line Friday, Snurdley.
What can I tell you?
We'll see what we get.
But it is clear that the Senate Democrats voted for more rape and for more murder yesterday by turning down the president's jobs bill.
I mean, what else can you conclude?
Since the Democrat-controlled Senate failed to pass Obama's jobs bill, it was a straight up and down majority vote.
The Democrats control 53 seats in the Senate.
They couldn't even muster 51 votes for this vitally important bill to stop rape.
Apparently, it still hasn't been broken down into small enough bite-sized chunks for even the Democrats to swallow.
Now, according to reporters on the ground in Libya, Colonel Qaddafi's body, there's one good thing about this guy's death, and that is the tombstone.
We're finally going to find out how he spells it.
There are about 120 different versions of the spelling of Qaddafi's name.
Oh, they did?
AP's got a story how he spells it.
So it's in the stack here?
Oh, we know that.
Oh, cool.
So we don't have to wait for the tombstone.
Fine.
Not what I was going to say anyway.
That was just a random thought.
According to reporters on the ground in Libya, Colonel Qaddafi's body was put on the hood of a car and driven around the town of Misrata yesterday.
Some of the rebels even posed with the corpse of Colonel Gaddafi.
This, ladies and gentlemen, apparently is how democracy works.
Well, this is a democratic movement.
We're told here this is the blossoming of democracy here in Libya, and this is what happens.
In democracy, you put the corpse on the hood of your car and you parade around the Capitol.
On the hood of the car, he's alive in the first video.
Oh, you know, I saw that video yesterday.
They haul him off the back of the pickup truck and then the savage group.
What are you trying to tell me that he's not dead?
Is that what you're trying to tell me?
No, you are trying to.
You're trying to tell me that you're not convinced he's dead yet.
And the only reason you're thinking that's because we haven't had the official confirmation from Calypso Louie.
Farrakhan has not issued a statement.
Now, Hugo Chavez has.
Hugo Chavez called him a martyr.
Hugo Chavez is a bad move.
But Calypso Louie has not said anything.
But the regime, the Obama bunch, has told us that this is an outbreak of democracy.
So I guess we have to add that to the definitions.
You're vanquished, get put on the hood of a car and paraded around town.
Let's go to the audio sound base very quickly because the Daily Press briefing yesterday at the White House, a reporter asked the press secretary Jay Carney following question.
The vice president said that murder will continue to rise, rape will continue to rise, all crime will continue to rise.
Does the president agree that that's going to happen if his jobs bill doesn't pass the Senate?
I think it would be hard to find anyone who doesn't agree with the simple equation that fewer police officers on the street has a direct effect on the crime rate.
That's the point he was making, and that's a point that the president absolutely does.
Actually, it doesn't, and we have the statistics to back it up.
Particularly, the factcheck.org has gone to work and they have nailed every argument and every stat that Biden used.
Folks, I'm going to tell you something.
This is unhinged with Biden and this rape business and Obama signing on it at Jay Carney.
I have a theory about this, and it goes beyond the fact that they're just lunatics.
They're trying to distract us.
Now, I think that there's something going on somewhere, the polling data, whatever it is, that is so bad.
This is over-the-top silly and stupid.
It really, for now, Carney to jump into this.
Oh, yeah, yeah, we fully support the vice president.
If that jobs bill doesn't pass, there could be more rapes.
Oh, yeah.
Well, fewer cops equals more rapes.
So the reporter said, but Mr. Secretary, the Republicans are jumping on this.
They're saying that they're being told that their opposition means more people to be raped, more people to be murdered.
What does the president say to them?
Are Republicans arguing that there is no correlation between the number of cops on the beat and the crime rate?
That would be an interesting argument to hear.
It's a new one, a novel one, but I'd like to hear it.
Yes, we are saying that more police officers on the beat is a good thing and will help keep crime rates lower.
More firefighters fighting fires will reduce the impact that fires will have in our communities and will save lives.
That's a fact.
What kind of talk is this?
More firefighters fighting fires will reduce the impact that fires have in our communities.
What is that?
That's like yesterday I jokingly referred to the rapist community in order to call in the rapist community.
Everything's a community out there.
Root word commune.
So the White House has doubled down on this.
And the president shares this point of view.
They're not walking this back.
They're not trying to clarify it and they're not trying to inject a little intelligence or common sense.
They're backing Bite Me fully.
I mean, they could say, well, we're not saying specifically that rapes ramp up.
What we're trying to do here is say that more firefighters and more cops could have an effect on the commissioner crime or apprehension of criminals or what have you, but they're not doing that.
They're going all in on this.
Now, more firefighters do not prevent more fires.
Fewer smoky bears or fewer campers or what?
Fewer lightning strikes.
But you could add a thousand firefighters to your town today.
It's not going to change the number of fires that break out.
How many firemen would it take for there never to be any fires?
How many policemen would it take for there never to be any rapes?
How many cops would it take for there never to be any robberies?
Ain't going to happen, which is why yesterday I wanted to try to go at this from the back end, so to speak, and talk to the actual criminals and ask them if they were watching all this and if the jobs bill passed, if rapists would commit fewer rapes.
I wanted to know what they were thinking.
I wanted to know if they were following it.
Bank robbers, people to hold up the Quickie Mart, purse snatchers, murderers, these little back barnyard thugs down there.
There's a woman.
There's a woman from Florida, a 38-year-old mother of four, who left her family to go join Occupy Wall Street.
And she's shacked up with some 30-year-old guy from India.
And she says, no, I'm not going back.
And look at this.
It's not strange.
People leave their families to join the military all the time.
I kid you not, a Florida mother of 438 has abandoned her home and her family to go join the protest.
It's rich out there today, folks.
Really, really rich.
From the National Journal, police officers, firefighters, and teachers are yesterday's news.
Senate Democrats are moving on to contractors and construction workers next.
After the defeat last night of legislation to give $35 billion to states and cities to hire and retain teachers and first responders, Senate Democrat leaders and Transportation Secretary Rayla Hood are highlighting the next proposal designed to highlight the individual components of President Obama's jobs message.
Are you ready for this one?
This piece of the president's jobs bill seeks $50 billion, not 35 to stop rape.
Now we're up here to $50 billion for immediate spending on the transportation network and another $10 billion to form an infrastructure bank to lure more private sector investment into the maintenance and construction of roads, bridges, railways, and runways.
So the next message is traffic and potholes.
$50 billion to stop traffic and fill potholes.
$35 billion for cops, firemen, and teachers, and fewer rapes, murders, and personnel.
Now $50 billion for traffic improvements, pothole repair, and National Journal.
This is where they're headed next.
Yes, yes, I know about the Steve Jobs biography leak.
I know it all.
I just, I can't talk about it all in the first 20-minute course I know about it.
Why don't you ask me if I don't know something?
The odds are far less.
Back after this.
It's Open Line Friday, and I am Rush Limbaugh, half my brain tied behind my back.
Just to make it fair, Jake Tapper at ABC News, a lot of other networks are alluding to this too, says that Obama at 1245, about 21 minutes or so from now, is going to announce the complete drawdown of U.S. troops from Iraq by the end of this year.
So basically, a couple of more months, just under two and a half months, we're out of Iraq in total.
In the words, war is over.
They got rid of Mubarak, got rid of bin Laden.
We got rid of Gaddafi, got rid of the guy in Tunisia, got rid of Olaki.
War is over.
Mission accomplished.
And the base, which has abandoned Obama in recent months, theoretically now will be reinvigorated.
Jazzed, as they say, because America is getting out of the world.
We're pulling our military away from every entanglement except Afghanistan.
This is without doubt part of the 2012 presidential campaign.
Now, this next, this is hilarious.
This is from Human Events.
An economic recovery bill authored by Representative Rosa Doloro, a Democrat Connecticut, seeks to empower struggling families by directing the federal government to distribute free diapers through daycare centers.
Free diapers, the Diaper Investment and Aid to Promote Economic Recovery Act.
The acronym is Diaper.
I'm not making this up.
The Diaper Investment and Aid to Promote Economic Recovery Act would relieve some of the stress on families facing hardship in the economy.
I'm reading from the bill by providing this direct service, Doloro said in a letter to congressional colleagues urging them to co-sponsor her bill.
Without diapers, children are not allowed to attend daycare, except Rosa DeLauro, who described those in need as a lost generation of Americans.
No, no, I'm not pooping you.
There's the story.
I kid you not.
The Diaper Investment and Aid to Promote Economic Recovery Act.
Without diapers, it says here, children are not allowed to attend daycare.
And DeLauro said, who described those in need of diapers as a lost generation of Americans.
Now, I am not, my generation was not lost.
And my generation did not go to daycare, and we wore cloth diapers that were washed and reused.
But I mean, this is taking indoctrination to steps I never dreamed of.
Indoctrinate babies early and often in daycare, and you get them in daycare by promising free diapers.
It says here in this story: one in five mothers have had to skip an obligation and stay home with their child because of a lack of diapers.
Now, where did they get this number?
This is like there were 3 million homeless for all those years until there weren't.
This is like cell phones are going to cause brain cancer until we find out that it doesn't.
Like coffee was going to cause heart attacks by age 40, except until we learn that it doesn't.
One in five mothers have had to skip an obligation to stay home with their child.
And it can't have that, by the way.
Can't have children staying home with their mothers.
Why?
That would be horrible.
Can't have mothers at home with their kids.
Why, we need the kids at the daycare center so we can corrupt them and pollute them and propagandize them, indoctrinate them.
One in five mothers have had to skip an obligation to stay home with their child because of a lack of diapers.
Losing out on daycare makes it even harder for parents to put in a full day's work.
Of course, in this instance, we're talking about people who might still have a job, which is a dwindling number.
We all believe that nothing we do in government is as important as ensuring the next generation has the tools to poop in, that they need to thrive.
But our children and our nation, she is saying this.
This is Rosa DeLaura.
We all believe that nothing we do in government is as important as ensuring the next generation has the tools they need to thrive.
But our children and our nation do succeed.
And for them to succeed, we need free diapers.
And we have to support their development, their families, and their public policies that ensure opportunity for diapers.
Ensuring that low-income families have access to diapers through the Diaper Act is one of those policies that'll make a difference.
And I urge you to become an original co-sponsor, DeLaura wrote in the October 5th letter.
Critics of the bill say that it exemplifies the type of cradle-to-grave named state legislation supported by Democrats.
DeLauro's legislation would aid families who have toddlers enrolled in daycare.
It does not include free diapers for stay-at-home or unemployed moms who don't use daycare.
So you can only get free diapers if you pack your kid off to government-run health care.
I am not, I don't think, making this up.
I am not making up the diaper bill, folks.
I'm not making up anything I said about it.
Free diapers for every mother who is in, has a kid in daycare.
If you're unemployed or your kid's not in daycare, you don't, if you're a stay-at-home mother or unemployed, you don't and don't use daycare, you don't get free diapers.
This is, I mean, gives a new meaning to the term pampering the poor.
Just, it's, it is absurd.
And now here's this.
This is from yesterday in the New York Post.
A 30-year-old California guy who wears diapers and lives as an adult baby can keep his $800 a month Social Security disability checks.
The agency has ruled.
Stanley Thornton is the guy's name.
His infantile lifestyle won him national attention after a National Geographic TV show revealed how he was spoon-fed and clad in baby clothes by his roommate, prompting Senator Tom Coburn, Republican Oklahoma, to demand a probe of his supplemental security income checks.
We recently reviewed the evidence in your social security disability claim.
We find that your disability is continuing, the agency wrote the guy.
So here we have a guy living as an adult baby, living in diapers.
And the Social Security Administration says he continues to qualify for disability payments.
Is not indicative.
Well, he does have, don't know about, has a job.
He wears diapers, lives as an adult baby.
Don't know if he has a job.
But look, the Rosa DeLaura bill would not affect him.
It would affect his parents.
But he's already getting the diapers.
It's just a little tie-in story.
Where are we going?
I want to always try to start the second half hour on Open Line Friday on the phones.
What's our first call?
Where are we?
Harry in Neptune City, New Jersey.
Hi, Harry.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
He's not there.
Harry, I knew he wasn't going to be there.
Hello.
Hey, Harry, how are you?
Good.
How are you doing, Roger?
Very well.
Thanks very much.
Longtime listener, 24 by 7 member.
Appreciate that.
I really appreciate that.
Thank you.
I wanted to call.
I have a friend who is an international hitman.
He's a member of the International Hitman Association of America.
I was talking to him last night about...
Now, wait a second.
Wait a second.
You have a friend who's a hitman?
Yes.
There's no International Hitmen of America Association, right?
You're just making that up.
Well, maybe.
Maybe.
I'm not sure the exact wording of it.
Okay.
But what you're saying is that this hitman has to be part of some group so people can reach him.
That's correct.
But if you want to hire him, you've got to know how to reach him.
And so there's a group, the hitman group.
Okay, so you got, you know, a friend who's a hitman.
Let's start there.
You have a friend who's a hitman.
Yeah, and I was speaking to him last night about the job spill.
I was talking, you know, I was telling him about the show, and I was listening yesterday at lunch.
And his concern was it's.
Wait a second.
Wait, whoa, whoa.
Hold it.
Your hitman is concerned with the legislation?
He is.
Okay, now tell me why.
Well, he's concerned that if the job spill passes and they put more police officers on the street, it's going to make their jobs more difficult.
It's going to cut into their income.
And it's going to push more of their work overseas, which means we're losing more jobs in America because of the job spill.
That is an interesting aspect of this.
I hadn't even thought of.
So it's not going to stop him from doing his job.
It's just going to change where he does it.
That's correct.
And, you know, this is a person that obviously pays taxes in the United States.
So we're going to lose taxable income.
He obviously has a support staff.
That support staff is going to wind up being outsourced overseas.
So it's going to have this ripple effect where we're going to lose jobs in America testing this jobs bill.
The Senate Democrats actually voted for more crime and more rape because they defeated the jobs bill.
So your hitman actually will not have to take his job overseas and his support staff and his tax revenue.
So the country is saved his services and his taxes.
Once again, it's great.
It's great to be in America.
Yeah, it is.
It really is.
Well, have you talked to him since the bill went down in defeat?
I have not.
I'll probably speak to him tonight.
He's probably going to throw a party now that it's been defeated.
Well, I'd like to know what he thinks.
I'd like to know if he's happy now that there will be fewer cops trying to catch him as he's out doing his job.
Yeah, I will talk to him tonight and ask him.
All right.
I appreciate the call, Harry.
I really is Harry from Neptune City, New Jersey.
It's a different perspective, folks.
That's something I hadn't considered.
Driving criminals overseas, outsourcing the work, say, to India and other places.
If the United States are going to make it tougher for rapists and muggers and murderers and hitmen to do their jobs in America, once again, it's Obama and the Democrats sending that work overseas.
Offshore, if you will.
You know, we're joking about it, and look at this.
We had a hitman actually following this, actually following the vote.
I should have asked if he was watching C-SPAN, but I didn't think of it in time.
Where are we going next?
Stephen, Huntsville, Texas, Open Line Friday.
Hello, sir.
Hello, how are you doing?
Very good.
Thank you.
I'd like to comment on Rick Perry's now going to the flat tax or his tax overhaul.
Yep.
And I'd like to comment saying that everyone's protesting Wall Street and everything like that want to 1% to pay their fair share.
And honestly, a flat tax, and what should appease them is making everybody pay their fair share.
I know Steve Forbes did one of the 17% whenever he ran for president.
But if everybody paid...
By the way, speaking of Steve Forbes, Steve Forbes has, I think, Steve Forbes is getting close to endorsing Perry.
Yes, yes.
I watched a video of him talking about it earlier today.
But I believe that right there would solve all the problems.
I mean, everyone wants them to pay their fair share.
So Rick Perry, I know, hasn't laid out a percentage yet.
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute.
How do you know everybody wants to pay their fair share?
General Electric doesn't.
Well, that's what the people of Wall Street want.
They want everybody to pay their fair share.
And that's what Obama has been running on.
The wealthy should pay their fair share.
What's more fair than everybody that pays taxes paying, say, 16% of what they make overall?
Well, what's more fair than everyone paying, actually, percentage-wise, their fair share?
Yeah, you've got to be careful on this whole fair share business.
Seriously, I have a major problem with the whole concept of fair.
I think it's elusive, difficult to define, other than situationally.
And it's risky, I'll tell you.
But speaking of endorsements, Judge Bork, who is writing a book called 1973, that's when he was Solicitor General and Nixon ordered him to go in there and fire everybody.
And he did it.
What became known as the Saturday Night Massacre, Robert Bork writing a book has endorsed Romney.
The primary reason is that he's not Obama.
But Bork has endorsed Romney.
Teve Torbs getting close to endorsing Rick Perry.
Got a break, and we'll take it.
It'll be back right after this.
Had a bunch of emails that I read during the break here.
Rush, don't worry, even if the hitman happens to leave the country, take his work overseas.
There are plenty of people coming into the country who will do jobs that Americans won't do anymore.
And I hadn't thought of that.
That's probably a relevant factor as well.
I mentioned factcheck.org in the first half hour of the program, running down the numbers on Vice President Bite Me and his claims on rape.
And the factcheck.org story documents that Biden is just lying brazenly.
And so are Dick Durbin, anybody else who happens to be supporting Biden in any of this.
Factcheck.org, Joe Biden falsely claimed on multiple occasions that the number of reported rapes in Flint, Michigan has skyrocketed since 2008, providing different accounts at different events that do not square with FBI data.
He started at a 152% increase, and since then has said rapes in Flint have tripled and have even quadrupled.
But FBI data show the number of rapes in Flint, Michigan has actually gone down 11% from 103 rapes in 2008 to 92 rapes in 2010.
And something that's not mentioned, and BiteMe doesn't mention, is that in Flint, Michigan, they alternately open and close the jail.
It's not always open.
Sometimes they don't have the money to keep it open.
Sometimes the townspeople vote to shut it down.
There's all kinds of variables, but the number of rapes in Flint, Michigan, and Biden is clearly saying we're losing cops.
We're not having as many cops in the street as we used to.
Rapes are skyrocketing.
They're not.
It's a total made-up farce.
Biden also said the city of Flint, Michigan's murder rate has tripled.
The city says there were a record high, 66 murders last year, double, not triple, the 32 murders that occurred in 2008.
So while the number of murders had gone up, not nearly as high or as much as Bite Me says.
The vice president has been touring the country, delivering his pitch for the American Jobs Act that includes $35 billion to prevent the layoff of cops, firefighters, and teachers.
On October 12, Biden visited Flint, Michigan, which has had the highest violent crime rate in the nation for the last two years.
The city's violent crime rate has increased from 20.2 violent crimes per 1,000 residents 2008 to 22 violent crimes per 1,000 residents in 2010.
That's a jump of about 9%, according to FBI data.
Crime is bad in Flint, no doubt, but Biden is making it out to be worse than it is.
Biden on October 18th, I was up in Flint, Michigan last week.
Their police departments cut more than half.
The murder rate close to triple.
The number of rapes had quadrupled.
A day later, Biden was asked by a reporter for Human Events if he regretted using a rape reference to describe Senate opposition to the bill.
Conservatives, including El Rushbo, have criticized the vice president for suggesting that rape and murder will rise if the Republicans don't pass the jobs bill.
Biden said, I said rape was up three times in Flint.
Those are the numbers.
Go look at the numbers.
Well, we've looked at the numbers at FactCheck.
We started with the number of reported rapes because Biden makes three claims that don't add up, that rapes have gone up from 103 to 229.
That's a 152% increase.
He said that rapes have quadrupled and that rapes have tripled.
He is badly wrong on all counts.
The FBI's uniform crime reports for those years show that the number of reported rapes declined.
From 103 in 2008 to 92 in 2010.
That's a drop of nearly 11%.
So will we get an apology from Biden and Jay Carney and Obama?
FactCheck also calculated the rate of reported rapes per 1,000 residents to account for the city's declining population.
And even then, the rate of rape has declined from 9.1 per 1,000 to 8.0 to 0.84, 0.91 rapes to 0.84 rapes per 1,000.
That's a decline of 8%.
We asked the vice president's office to explain such a gross discrepancy.
It referred us to the Flint mayor's office saying the figures came from the city.
And in response to our questions here at factcheck.org, Flint, Public Safety Director Chief Alvern Locke, put out a statement saying the city stands behind the crime stats provided to the Office of Vice President.
So Biden got on the phone to Flint and said, you're backing me up.
Nobody messes with me.
You know, Muamark Gaddafi also had hair plugs.
I don't know that there's a connection.
They say that cell phone use can cause cancer.
What about hair plugs?
What percentage of people who died last year have hair plugs?
What percentage of people with hair plugs are certifiably insane?
We know two of them, BiteMe and Muamarkaddafi.
Seriously, they're just out there making this stuff up.
Factcheck.org finds out.
Let's ask Stacey if we can call her back when we've got, I don't want to give her just only two minutes.
We've got our insurance expert from Georgia on the phone, but I don't have enough time really to let her get into what she wants to talk about.
So give me somebody else before we head to the break.
And we'll take a break now and we'll come back and resume right after this.
Don't go away.
Head back to the phone to Williamsburg, Iowa.
Hi, Deb.
I'm glad you called here on Open Line Friday.
Welcome.
Thank you.
I was told to get right to my point.
So my point is this person who is the diaper bill, they cannot possibly be a true Democrat because if she was, she would be wanting them not to use disposable diapers, but she would be pushing the reusable diapers so she could put more people to work when they wash the diapers.
That's an interesting thought, but I can tell you that this is a genuine, full-fledged, undeluded Democrat.
Rosa Delaware.
She's deluded if she thinks that people should be forced to pay for some other kid's diapers.
If they can't afford the diapers for their kid, they shouldn't have one.
Really?
Yeah.
Okay, I agree.
But then if we're going to say that about diapers, why do we not say it about other things like food?
That's a really good question because I do daycare for a living myself.
And I think I've got one of the most important jobs in the country because I am raising someone's child to be a better person.
And just so you know, every kid at my daycare listens to Rech Limbaugh almost every day.
Right now.
Right on.
I'm happy to hear that.
And there's probably more of that going on than anybody would believe.
But really, folks, free diapers?
A piece of legislation called the Diaper Act?
Taxpayers will give diapers to mothers, only mothers who send their kids to daycare.
If you're unemployed or a stay-at-home mom, but what?
I mean, this whole thing is an absolute absurd.
We have a member of Congress who's actually considered this and has written it out and it's real legislation.
And she's looking for a co-sponsor in the midst of all of this, in the midst of the economic destruction we face, in the midst of all of the debt and all the spending, in the midst of people rising up against it.
Now, diapers are an entitlement.
Diapers for crying out loud.
And it's being reported by news agencies as seriously as it can be.
There's nobody questioning it.
There's nobody raising red flags.
Nobody thinks it's out of the ordinary or odd except us.
Anyway, that's it, folks.
Another exciting hour.
▲
Export Selection