All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:50
October 18, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 Podcast.
I've changed my mind.
We will use Audio Sandwich 5 and 6.
All right.
So we're just going to skip number one.
Greetings, folks.
How are you?
We are back in a saddle.
Ready for another three hours of broadcast excellence, hosted by me.
Rush Limboa here at the Limboy Institute, the distinguished and prestigious Limbo Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Telephone number if you'd like to join us, 800 282-2882, the email address.
Lrushbow at EIB net.com.
The Barack Hussein Obama.
Out there on another bus tour.
Wasting precious fuels, polluting the skies, ruining the climate.
When all he would have to do is walk to the Capitol.
All he needs is votes from Democrats in the Senate.
He really wants to pass this boondoggle of a jobs bill.
Just walk across the Capitol, get over there to the Senate, get those two extra votes.
Voila, done.
But no.
Have to get in a Canadian-made bus and drive all over North Carolina.
It was in uh Asheville.
You know, Asheville, where uh the famous Vanderbilt estate is.
Ashville, North Carolina, he's in these, he's there, he's uh flipping all around, and you've heard the story about the truck carrying Obama's teleprompter and other electronic equipment being stolen.
Now we can't confirm that the teleprompter was actually stolen.
The truck was, and the truck was recovered.
Whether the prompter was actually stolen, we don't know.
But we do have some evidence is Obama did speak.
And there was no teleprompter.
This is what it sounded like.
Uh uh to today, we are and uh my uh jobs plan uh uh Well uh thank you very much.
Oh, we uh you know uh I uh uh well uh my job's plan is uh um you know it it's uh pretty cool.
Yeah, pretty cool.
Uh you know, because uh thank you very much.
So while we don't have any hard evidence a teleprompter was stolen, uh you'll be the judge.
Seriously, the bus tour is just a campaign tour.
He really all he needs to do is just walk across the uh walk across town if he's worried about saving the climate, drive across town, whatever, and we have a meeting with the Senate.
That's literally all he has.
This is the Obama in the bus is that it's kind of like uh Michael Dukakis riding in the tank a second time.
Looking like Beetle Bailey.
Remember that?
Back in 1988.
It's amazing.
That seems like it was yesterday.
And it's uh coming 23 years.
A lot of conflicting uh reports, folks, about Occupy Wall Street, Occupy DC, Occupy Oakland, all kinds of people are going to these rallies and interviewing them, talking to them, and everybody's coming away with a different take.
Uh on one hand, you have people saying, be very scared.
Be very worried.
These people are really smart and they're really educated.
They're terribly wrong, but they're very articulate and they're very serious, and do not laugh at them because there's nothing funny.
Other people go in there and talk to them and say the biggest bunch of idiots they've ever encountered.
Now Doug Schoen is out.
He's got a poll.
He is warning the White House do not back these people.
And there are two places where Doug Schoen's polling data is reported.
One's a politico, the other is the Wall Street Journal.
In fact, the Wall Street Journal Schoen wrote the piece himself.
At the politico story first, Doug Schoen is out with a warning for President Obama.
Supporting Occupy Wall Street could cost you a second term.
Doug Schoen, Democrat pollster.
He was a big Clinton poster back in the uh in the 90s.
I don't know he doesn't enjoy the position in the party that he once had.
I don't know what happened.
It's more than the fact that he just shows up on Fox all the time now, but he he's clearly in the last two years been producing polling data that is uh is not favorable and is uh very much a warning to Obama and the Democrats.
And he predicted the 2010 disaster in the midterm congressional elections.
That's why we listened to him.
He gets together now and then with Pat Cadell.
And he said that President Obama, the Democrat leadership are making a critical error in embracing the Occupy Wall Street movement, and it may cost them the 2012 election.
This is the op-ed in a Wall Street Journal today.
The movement spread beyond New York City now reflects values that are dangerously out of touch with the broad mass of the American people, and particularly with swing voters who are largely independent and have been trending away from the president since the debate over health care reform.
In the op-ed, Schoen presents findings collected by his firm.
What he touts is probably the first systematic random sample of Occupy Wall Street opinion.
The numbers show 52% of the Occupy protesters have participated in a political movement before.
Ninety-eight percent said that they would support civil disobedience to achieve their goals.
31% said that A would even support violence to advance their agenda.
In addition, Schoen said an overwhelming majority of the protesters supported the president in 2008, but that now only 44% of them approve of Obama, and only 48% of them will vote for him again in 2012.
And you want to hear something else?
Most of them are employed.
Most of them are employed.
Our research shows clearly that the movement doesn't represent unemployed America.
It is not ideologically diverse.
Rather, it comprises an unrepresentative segment of the electorate that believes in radical redistribution of wealth, civil disobedience, and in some instances, violence.
Half have participated in a political movement before.
Ninety-eight percent say they would support civil disobedience.
Nearly one-third would support violence to advance their agenda.
The vast majority of demonstrators are actually employed.
And the proportion of protesters unemployed, 15%, is within single digits of the national unemployment rate.
So only 15% of these people are unemployed.
So they're not marching for jobs.
They're not protesting.
They're protesting because they have to work.
They're protesting because they don't want to work.
And you want to hear something hilarious?
Thieves have now set upon these people.
Thieves are stealing their cell phones and their other electronic gadgets.
And they're ticked off about it.
They can't believe people would focus on them and steal their stuff.
They don't see that that's exactly what they are all about.
They want to steal everybody else's stuff for them in the name of equality.
And here come a bunch of thieves showing up, stealing their iPhones and stuff, and they're ticked off.
Folks, this is why you need to pay attention to me talking to you about this because there's so much BS out there about this group.
I mean, I have seen things that you gotta take them seriously.
These are smart, these are articulate people, and they represent far more Americans than you would ever know.
Then they get shown with a completely opposite take on who they are.
And all these people reporting who this group is claim to be going down talking to them, some of them taking videos with four or five people, and then making a judgment that these four or five are representative of the whole group.
They're idiots.
And I've watched some of the stuff.
They're idiots.
You talk to them.
I've had this notion that they're articulate and smart.
Give me a break.
My dogs make more sense than these people do.
And I it just it's it's clear that what you have here is your average minority malcontent bunch of spoiled brats who don't want to work.
They resent that they have to work.
And when they get a little dose of their own medicine, like their precious gadgets being stolen, they don't know what to do about it.
But they are employed, they're genuinely unhappy, their lives are meaningless, they want to matter.
I mean, I know the profile.
And so they join this group and they try to get attention.
And the thing one thing that continues to be reported but doesn't seem to take hold is how small this whole thing is how small these individual groups of people are.
Of course, the the uh the regime and the media have a vested interest in this group, making it look big and spontaneous, but it isn't.
Here's more from Doug Schoen.
An overwhelming majority of uh demonstrators supported Obama 2008.
Now 51% disapprove.
Which makes sense.
If you listen to these people and you and you and you hear what they seriously claim to be upset about, why would they be supporting Obama?
Now, they claim to be upset at the banks and and uh, but that's not what they're saying.
Majority of them are upset at Obama.
And they're not gonna vote for him again.
But the media and Obama trying to tell us that these people don't like the banks.
Now, they've got no love for the banks, but they're not singularly focused against the banks.
Only 48% say they will vote to re-elect Obama in 2012.
Twenty-five percent will not.
Fewer than one in three, this is 32%, call themselves Democrats.
Roughly the same proportion, 33% say that they aren't represented by any political party.
The Occupy Wall Street group, this Doug Schoen writing here in the Wall Street Journal, thus Occupy Wall Street is a group of engaged progressives who are disillusioned with the capitalist system and have a distinct activist orientation.
Among the general public, by contrast, 41% of Americans self-identify as conservative, 36% as moderate, only 21% is liberal.
That's why the Obama Pelosi embrace of the movement could prove catastrophic for their party, because they're a minority.
And I I keep trying to drum this into people's heads as a means of keeping everybody psychologically up.
We are not the minority in either numbers or thinking in this country.
The left is.
But the assault on us and what we believe and what we think is everywhere, and the amount of negativity that is out there, if you don't, if you don't know how to avoid it, it can really affect you because it's everywhere.
I mean, including on our side.
Defeatism, agony, despair, it's all over the place.
You have to know how to how to rise above it or have boundaries told it all that bounces off you, and that's what I do.
Rather than embracing huge new spending programs and tax increases, Doug Schoen back to his conclusion here.
Rather than embracing huge new spending programs and tax increases, plus increasingly radical and potentially violent activists, the Democrats should instead build a bridge to the much more numerous independents and moderates in the center by opposing bailouts and broad-based tax increases.
And instead, the Democrats are throwing in with this bunch.
Which is perfect for us.
They're throwing in with this bunch of looney tunes.
They're adopting them.
Put simply, Democrats need to say that they are with voters in the middle who want cooperation, conciliation, and lower taxes.
And they should work particularly hard to contrast their rhetoric with The extremes advocated by the Occupy Wall Street crowd.
Sean served as pollster to President Bill Clinton, author of Hopelessly Divided The New Crisis in American Politics and What It May Mean for 2012 and Beyond.
That's the title of the book.
They needed two covers in order to put the title on it.
I've never seen a longer title for a uh for a book.
Um C USA Today.
Washington to blame more than Wall Street for economy.
This is a poll of most Americans, not just of the Wall Street crowd.
Let's see.
This website prints actually need a telescope or a microscope to read this.
And in the I'm gonna have to figure this out before I basically it is this.
USA Today Gallup poll.
Uh yeah, but who's who's polled here?
H.R. is this is this Occupy Washington or the regular people.
Okay, USA Today Gallup poll went out and I talked to regular people.
And the American people blame Washington more than Wall Street, 64 to 30%.
That's what it is.
And the narrative offered by Obama on who's responsible for a mess is coming up short.
Obama is not persuading people in the Occupy Wall Street crowd, not persuading people that Wall Street's the problem.
64 to 30 percent USA today gallop.
Somebody's gonna get canned for even conducting this poll.
Then somebody's gonna get canned for reporting the poll.
And somebody's gonna get canned for publishing the poll.
64 to 30 percent.
The American people blame Washington more than Wall Street for our economic problems in Malays.
Quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue after this.
You know, I'd say to Doug Sean...
Doug, nice try.
Little late to uh tell Obama not to embrace the protesters.
He organized and hired him.
And the protesters think he's gonna come down and say hi to them.
I mean, he's left the door open to going down there and encouraging them.
Now, clearly, this is an astro-turf job run by the AstroTurf creator and inventor David Raxelrod.
Uh, and it can only work, can only work with cooperation from the state-controlled media because on the ground, the reality in Virginia, AP, state-controlled AP.
Don't look for Democrats in fiercely contested legislative elections to join Obama as he brings his American Jobs Act bus tour to three Virginia cities.
For that matter, don't expect to see Tim Kane, the former Democrat National Committee chairman and past Virginia governor to join Obama either.
One statewide elected official will join Obama.
Republican governor Bob McDonald.
A GOP vice presidential prospect and a sharp frequent critic of the Obama White House.
McDonald announced that he would appear with the Obama tomorrow at a stop in Hampton at a military base for an event advocating expanded employment opportunities for veterans.
Republicans say that Democrats were so afraid to embrace Obama that Obama changed his Virginia itinerary to avoid stops near targeted Democrats.
Obama is staying away from Democrats running for re-election in Virginia who are in toss-ups because he's a drag.
He's an obstacle.
Wolf Blitzer, CNN.
There's some numbers in our new CNN orc international poll that should seriously worry President Obama and the Democrats.
Republicans are right now a lot more enthusiastic about voting in the next election than Democrats.
Some 64% of Republicans say they are extremely very enthusiastic compared to only 43% of Democrats.
But for the president, there may be an even more alarming number.
Among all voters, 59% think that Obama's policies will fail compared to only 36% Who say they will succeed.
And Wolf Blitzer, writing at CNN.com says there's still plenty of time for the president and the Democrats to turn this around.
Now, I'm told that we should not pay much attention to this, though, folks.
This voter enthusiasm business.
That the harbinger for all of this is the school board elections in Wake County, North Carolina, where the Democrats shellacked the Republicans.
The Democrats had three times the margin of victory in early voting.
The Democrats got people out like crazy.
The Republicans sat home.
This is the Wake County school board elections.
And I'm told that that is what we should do.
That's more indicative of the coming election in 2012 than what CNN's poll says.
Uh indicates.
So voter enthusiasm in a poll, yeah, but in the Wake County, North Carolina school board race, Democrats took it all.
It may be over, folks.
Here's the story about the thieves descending upon the Occupy Wall Street crowd.
It's in the New York Post.
It's a den of thieves.
Occupy Wall Street protesters said yesterday that packs of brazen crooks within their ranks have been robbing their fellow demonstrators blind, making off with pricey cameras, phones and laptops, and even a hefty bundle of donated cash and food.
Stealing is our biggest problem at the moment, said Nan Terry, 18, a kitchen and legal team volunteer from Fort Lauderdale.
Now, isn't that what these protests are all about?
Stealing.
There have been signs.
The protesters are carrying signs that say we just want your money.
So apparently stealing is only a problem when it happens to you.
When it happens to others, it's social justice.
One of these protesters was crying, I had my Mac stolen.
That was like it was like $5,500.
Every night something else is gone.
Last night our entire kitchen budget for the day was stolen.
So the first thing I had to do was get the message out to our supporters that we needed food.
Crafty cat burglars sneaked into the makeshift kitchen as a cotton park overnight, swiped as much as $2,500 in donated cash from right under the noses of volunteers who had fallen asleep after a long day whipping up meals for the hundreds of hungry protesters.
I had umbrellas stolen, a fold-up bed I brought because my back is bad.
They took that too.
Security volunteer Harry Wyman, 22 of Brooklyn, was furious about the thievery and vowed to get tough.
I'm not getting paid, but I'm not going to stand for this.
Why people got to come here and do stupid stuff?
All it does is make people not want to come here anymore, he fumed.
I don't understand this, folks.
I thought the whole idea here was share and share alike.
I thought the whole idea here was that whatever you have is everybody else's.
I thought the whole idea here was if somebody's got a $5,500 Mac and you don't have a $5,500 MAC that you're entitled to it.
I thought that if there was an envelope of $2,500 of cash in a kitchen, and it's not yours that you're entitled to it.
They haven't gotten around to blaming George W. Bush yet because they're still begging for food now.
They're not begging for food, they're begging for cash.
They want replacements.
At one point yesterday, Wyman, this is Harry Wyman, 22 Brooklyn Other Volunteers, briefly scuffled with a guy who was standing near a park entrance with a pail calling out donations, donations, and pocketing the cash that people tossed in the bucket.
So here's a guy collecting donations, pocketing what he was collecting.
What's wrong with that?
I mean, this whole group is about thievery.
This whole group is about burglary in the name of social justice, but look what happens when it happens to them.
They get so righteously outraged and indignant.
What I love about this is that you've got some people.
Same people that have learned how to how to scam Medicare And Social Security.
They see exactly what we have here a collection of absolute bird brains.
They see a bunch of spoiled, rotten, probably a lot of rich kids.
They know there's going to be a lot of money there and a lot of goodies.
So they wait until these people burn themselves out at the end of the day, get all tired, is walk in there dressed up as fellow protesters and just walk out with whatever they want.
It's easy.
Because these protesters can't fathom anybody taking anything from them.
And when they do, of course, it's terrible, terribly injustice.
Meanwhile, the Reverend Jackson was at Zucati Park late last night as he and about 50 protesters.
Speaking of con men, the Reverend Jackson showed up.
This is not going to make Reverend Sharpton happy.
It looks like he got upstage.
The Reverend Jackson was at Zuccotti late last night as he and about 50 protesters formed a human chain in front of a medical tent after cops came over to ask about the tent.
A medical tent where they probably dispense medical marijuana.
It's probably what's going on in there.
Jesse dropped in like a ninja, said Stephanie Paracone, 21.
He came out of nowhere.
And he helped us out.
The officers were asking about the size of the tent when the crowd of demonstrators, including the Reverend Jackson, stood en masse in front of it.
The cops saidn't ask for it to be taken down, and the issue was quickly resolved.
What a triumph, another triumph for the great Jesse Jackson.
Hope he got his usual cut.
Hope they paid him.
Can you imagine a Reverend Jackson showing up to shake down these four people after they're being stolen from?
And he shows up.
By the way, Bloomberg, what Bloomberg said something about this.
Yeah.
This is in the New York Times.
Maker Mayor Michael Doomberg speaking Monday as Occupy Wall Street protesters celebrated the passage of one month in Campton's Acadi Park said he was trying to strike a balance between protecting protesters' right to free speech and the needs of lower Manhattan residents.
He said the Constitution doesn't protect tents.
It protects speech and assembly.
We can't have a place where only one point of view is allowed.
Not looking good for the protesters, and Mayor Doomberg's about to turn on them and claiming their tents are not protected under the First Amendment.
Now, you got a you got a student down there, whoever protester with a $5,500 Mac.
They're all over the place with iPhones and other gadgets.
Obviously they can afford these expensive toys, but they can't afford their student loans.
They want their debt forget.
They don't want to have to pay off their student loans.
And you know, more about Jeffrey Immelt, the uh uh CEO of General Electric and also the CEO of Wells Fargo.
You know, a lot of people.
I can understand people being unhappy with the economy.
Makes perfect sense to be upset you can't find a job.
Makes perfect sense to be.
We've got to pay very special attention.
A lot of people are afraid of this munch.
Or if they're not afraid or trying to score some points somehow by sidling up to them.
But it's not, it isn't going to work as the Doug Schoen polling data indicates.
To the audio sound bites, John King.
Ladies and gentlemen, CNN, this is good.
John King, CNN, has repudiated his own random act of journalism because I praised it.
This has to be heard to believe.
Last night, yes, the well, no, no, no, no.
The Raspberry effect was no, no, no.
The raspberry effect is William Raspberry, a former columnist of the Washington Post, he wrote a piece highly critical of me based on things he had heard people say.
Then one day he just said, you know what, I'm gonna listen.
And William Raspberry listened to the program and basically retracted the criticisms that he had offered, saying I didn't hear anything that sounded like the criticisms I had been told.
So the Raspberry Effect, if you actually listen to the program, you have a far different impression of it than if you just listen to people describe it to you who have never listened either, who have an agenda.
This, this is quite different.
This is John King actually repudiating his own random act of journalism because I well he's he's repudiating his story.
He's not retracting it, he's repudiating it.
Because I praised it.
Here, I'll show you what I'm talking about.
Audio soundbite.
This is number two.
This is John King last night on his show, John King USA.
To hear Rush Limbaugh, we here at John King USA have caught the Attorney General in a lie, or at least a non-truth when it comes to his knowledge of the controversial gun trafficking program, Fast and Furious.
John King is calling attention to a huge contradiction.
How did the president know about this in March?
And how did the president know the attorney general knew nothing about this in March when the Attorney General says in May he just learned about it a couple of weeks ago?
Okay, so and that this was a question that John King himself asked.
If you recall the original story, John King played the audio soundbites of both these guys, and uh raised some uh questions.
Credibility questions on the part of both Obama and Holder, and we simply reported it.
John King had committed a random act of journalism.
He had been dubious, uh suspicious, curious of two ranking members of the regime.
It normally doesn't happen.
CNN normally covers up for the regime.
Uh Democrat regimes particularly.
And since we praised John King, got a little nervous out there.
So after playing that clip of me talking about his reporting on Fast and Furious, the gun program.
Mr. King then continued.
Here's tonight's truth.
While we're always appreciative of kind words, the facts do not support the black and white right and wrong view of Mr. Limbaugh and other conservatives who see a flat out contradiction.
The public record shows it was Holder himself who ordered his department's inspector general to investigate Fast and Furious.
Again, that was in March.
So he clearly knew about the controversy then.
What is curious is why he was then so vague when he told Congress he learned, as you just heard, quote, a few weeks ago.
Holder knows better.
He's an experienced attorney and an experienced political appointee, a veteran of the Clinton administration who knows all too well the perils of giving vague answers to a new Republican majority determined to challenge the Democratic administration with aggressive oversight.
Okay, so here again, King commits another random act of journalism, repeating his original random act of journalism while attempting to repudiate it at the same time.
Because I happen to cite it and praise it.
So after at first defending Holder and attacking conservatives by saying that we at John King USA are always appreciative of kind words.
The facts don't support the black and white right and wrong view of Mr. Limbaugh and other conservatives who see a flat out contradiction.
A public record shows it was Holder himself who ordered his department's inspector general to investigate Fast and Furious.
So clearly he knew about the controversy then.
What is curious?
Here comes the random act of journalism again.
What is curious is why he was so vague when he told Congress he learned only a few weeks ago.
And here comes the I gotta get it right with the regime portion of the report.
Holder knows better.
He's an experienced attorney, experienced political appointment.
You imagine Clarence Thomas knows better.
Alberto Gonzalez knows better.
And yet it wasn't true.
He uh wasn't true.
He ought to be Eric Holder's lawyer after this defense.
He has since tried to satisfy the committee with a very detailed letter, but the Republicans want to see him in person.
They want him to testify again.
Well, here's betting he has a much more detailed recollection when he does.
Until then, Republicans can rightly say they have questions and can rightly say the attorney general in that testimony you just heard could have been and should have been more precise.
Right.
But the truth is it's a stretch and a huge stretch to say anything beyond that.
Well, uh uh uh see here.
Uh this all started with Mr. King saying to hear Rush Limbaugh, we here at John King USA have caught the attorney general in a lie, or at least a non-truth.
Well you know a lie is different than a non-truth.
You know the difference?
Democrats tell non-truths and they know better.
And when we catch them telling non-truths, we're gonna we're gonna help them finesse their way through it.
Republicans lie.
And they do it on purpose for the attempt to deceive and protect themselves.
But Holder was a non-truth.
And um we know that when he testifies again, he'll be far more specific.
He'll have a much more detailed recollection.
Until then, Republicans can rightly say they have questions, and I can rightly say the attorney general that testimony you just heard could have been, should have been more precise.
Truth is he told a non-truth.
But that's a stretch.
A huge stretch to say anything beyond he told a non-truth.
Mr. King probably, to be fair, here is fighting for his professional life, and we know uh the the the worst thing that can happen, the worst thing that can happen to a liberal media person to be praised by me.
They can't you just don't know.
Living that down is next to impossible.
I get divorced over it in some cases.
Ladies and gentlemen, I noted lovable radio raconteur El Rushbo have no children.
And I have been very open about this.
So I don't really know how to hold babies.
But there's a picture, the far left-hand picture, three of them at the Drudge Report.
There are three pictures.
The far left-hand picture, I want you to log on to the Drudge Report to look at how Obama is holding a little baby and tell me if that's how it's done.
And notice.
Well, it's the one hand, one finger hold.
Are you looking at it, Brian?
Do you see that?
You have a child.
Are you ever held your child that way?
One finger there.
You ever done that?
I uh never seen anybody do this.
And this is all the while Obama says he's not campaigning.
I'm gonna take a call as we wrap up the first hour.
Wherever we go, Rochester, New York.
Hey Mike, I'm glad you're up first today.
Welcome to the program.
Rush, how are you?
Very well, sir.
Thank you.
You and Mark Levin, best radio across America.
I'd love to listen to you why I drive truck.
I got two questions.
Uh I hope you can get to the second one because that's more important to me than the first.
Well, then ask it first.
With your vast knowledge and your memory bank, can you recall any president so arrogant, condescending, self-righteous as the one we have right now?
Uh what he said yesterday about having to break down that bill so the Republicans can't.
Yeah, I'd take a fight of it or whatever, Jim.
I think Bill Clinton was this arrogant and condescending.
Uh, Clinton Clinton.
I don't recall that.
No, the the the the uh the talk about Republicans wanting to kill people and wanting them to die and all I mean that my gosh, various uh Democrat senators and members of Congress.
This is not new talk.
Now, maybe you're asking it from a president.
Is it is it now you may have a you have to you may have a point on uh on that.
My I just I think back I think back to the way they talked about Reagan.
Uh it really isn't anything new.
They're just recycling pages in their playbook.
Well, I'm not talking about everybody in office.
I'm just talking presidential material.
Well, we've never had it's a close contest in narcissist between this guy and Clinton.
Well, I think he needs to take a good lesson from Bush.
Say what you want about his policies, uh uh bills, whatever.
He is such a man, he shows so much class.
Far more than Obama would ever know or what's the second question?
Because we're we're running out of time.
What's the second question?
No, I'm gonna have to put my shame aside on this, but I heard you say one time to uh uh another caller, you've got a whole wall of laptops.
I need one.
I gotta get your limbaugh letter.
I gotta I gotta be bold enough just to come right out and ask it.
Well, I appreciate your asking.
I have a I have a policy though.
I've got a policy.
I never I I I no, I don't I decide when I want to give one away.
It's totally on impulse.
And uh I I have a policy.
I uh I don't give away when somebody asks.
Then it's not a gift, and I wouldn't have anything left in five minutes.
If you go to Drudge, take a look at that photo that I just called your attention to.
Note the guy behind Obama.
That guy's either um really getting off on this, or he just has got a great sense of humor.
One of the two.
▲
Export Selection