All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:35
October 17, 2011, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We're back.
Rush Lindbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone and the cutting edge of societal evolution.
You listen irregularly, you're going to be ahead of the trends because we are ahead of the trends.
You'll know it before it happens.
It's my job, men.
800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program email address, lrushpo at EIBnet.com.
I want to go back and air for you Eric Cantor from the House Republican leadership.
This was yesterday on Fox News Sunday.
We know in this country right now that there is a complaint about folks at the top end of the income scales, that they make too much and too many don't make enough.
Well, we need to go encourage those at the top of the income scale to actually put their money to work to create more jobs so that we can see a closing of the gap.
You know, we're about income mobility, and that's what we should be focused on to take care of the income disparity in this country.
Okay.
Not to be repetitive, but if you're just joining us, that's yesterday, Fox News Sunday.
The Democrats, as an agenda item, have been harping on the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, this widening gap between the two groups.
And Obama has been saying that the rich need to start spending more money.
They need to start hired people.
Invest in jobs.
Stop hoarding the cash.
They know they've got it.
No, you're Republicans.
Why be different?
You know what?
We find a problem with it, too.
We think the rich ought to be spending their money more.
This is fear.
And I said when I played the soundbite that Romney has done something similar, and it's on this.
I found the story.
It's from a blogger, Walter or Warner Todd Houston, only days ago.
Mitt Romney was saying that the Occupy Wall Streeters were dangerous, but true to his penchant to grow, in his opinion, which means to flip-flop.
Romney is now beginning to accept the Occupy Wall Street theme of the 99%.
Ron, let's see, during the first week of October, Romney was pounding Occupy whatever's is dangerous.
All it took for Romney to begin his flip-flopping or growing was one way because now at a town hall in Hopkinton, New Hampshire, suddenly Romney is all about understanding the plight of the 99%.
You have to understand them.
So for some reason, well, I know what the reason is.
It's fear.
The protests and this assault on the rich orchestrated by the Democrats as the reason for all things wrong in this country, the Republicans have decided that they've got to get in on that action.
By hook or by crook.
Now, we know everybody's poll-driven in Washington.
Do they have polling data which tells them that the majority of people in the country sympathize with the Occupy Wall Street people?
They have polling data that tells them that the public agrees with the Occupy Wall Street protests.
And therefore, they better not be left behind, the Republicans.
Better start saying things that indicate they are sympatico, see it somewhat similarly.
Why else do this?
Okay, so they got they're watching TV.
So you think they're being moved by what they see on TV?
Okay, moved with the pictures, afraid of the pictures.
But it's all a hoax.
But they can't afford to take the chance that it's not a hoax.
They have to roll a dice saying, maybe this is real.
These people, we want to get reelected and we don't want to be in the 1% or what have you.
Our guys, they don't care whether it's a hoax or not.
Especially Front Runner.
Doesn't care if it's a hoax or not.
If it's what's on TV, it's what has to be reacted to.
Or if, okay, if the public perception, whether it's right or wrong, and if it's on TV, then, okay, we have to act like we hear you, and we're with you.
So while Obama is out trying to organize this bunch, he's, by the way, responsible for this.
This is Obama's protest to counter the Tea Party.
They're jealous.
The Democrats are so jealous of Tea Party, they can't see straight.
This kind of thing is not spontaneous.
They didn't bubble up out of nothing.
This didn't bubble up out of genuine passion like the Tea Party did.
They've had to create this.
They've had to pay for it.
They're advertising for protests.
And even that, the numbers of people showing up are not that big.
I got to, let me find this.
It's a piece by Walter Shapiro in The New Republic.
He says, one of the major points about this is that it isn't that big.
The number of people involved in this thing are not that many.
Now, wouldn't you know it?
I thought I had it in this stack.
I've got a separate Occupy Wall Street stack.
And I know I put it in here.
I'll have to find it for you.
But Walter Shapiro used to write for USA Today as a typical left-wing journalist.
And also, do you know that the, this probably will not surprise you.
Andrew Breitenbart has dug this one up, that journalists are advising the protesters.
Emails have been found.
Journalists at MSNBC and some guy named Matt Taibbi at some Dylan Radigan at MSNBC and Matt Taibbi are sending emails back and forth with organizers telling them how to position their demands, that they've got to have some demands, how they can improve their coverage.
This whole thing is a construct of the media-Democrat complex, industrial complex.
Occupy D.C. emails show mainstream media Dylan Radigan working with protesters to craft message.
Daniel Losch has actually written about it.
Big journalism has learned that the Occupy Washington, D.C. movement is working with well-known media members to craft its demands and messaging while these media members report on the movement.
Someone has made the emails from Occupy D.C. email bistroad public and searchable.
The names in the list are a veritable who's who in the media.
Dylan Radical, Matt Radigan, Matt Taibbi from Rolling Stone, Noam Chomsky, Bill Moyers.
All of these so-called journalists are advising via email the organizers of the DC protest how to position their demands and what to say.
That doesn't matter, Rush.
It's on television and it's on television and it looks like people are sympathetic to it.
We Republicans have to react to it.
We can't just sit here and be critical.
Yeah, you can teach.
You can try to inform and educate people.
But see, that's not what this bunch is about.
This bunch is about making no waves, trying to capitalize as much as they can, make sure that the impression Republicans are mean, selfish stuff so-and-so is not true.
Go out of our way.
Anyway, same old, same old.
I got to take a break.
We'll come back and get your call started right after this.
Don't go away.
Here's that Walter Shapiro piece from the New Republic, a truth about Occupy Wall Street.
It's much smaller than it seems.
With tensions at a fever pitch, and TV viewers from Laos to Lapland glued to their sets.
And therein lies the reason.
Our guys are caving on this.
With tensions at a fever pitch and TV viewers from Laos to Lapland glued to their sets, the Occupy Wall Street protesters won a last-minute reprieve Friday morning for Mayor Boomberg's demand that they vacate Zuccotti Park for cleanup.
By the way, the guy that owns Zuccotti Park is in bed with Obama and clean energy plans.
Somebody is on the board of directors.
It's just crony capitalism.
The web of deceit, so intricately woven here that it's possible to unravel it.
And when you do, you find that this whole thing is a Democrat construct.
From viewing fragmentary photos and glancing at the headlines, the uninitiated might imagine that this spot was a pristine green sward before the protest.
Not a chance.
Devoid of natural beauty and not surrounded by any obvious symbols of capitalism, unless you count Brooks Brothers, this narrow block-long open space, Zuccotti Park, boasts all the charm of a strip mall parking lot.
The fruit of a real estate deal.
It dates back to the troubled era when John Lenzie was mayor and New York was laughingly dubbed fun city.
Zuccotti Park is an unlikely setting for anything, let alone the purported rebirth of the American left.
I thought it was going to be a grass park, said Aaron McEwen, a community college student on sabbatical who's part of the protest.
I thought it was going to be a grass park.
It's not.
It's cement.
Matt Smith, a bearded tourist from New Zealand who spent four days camping with the protesters, radiated a similar sense of puzzlement when I spoke with him on Monday.
I was expecting to be on Wall Street itself.
Nothing about Occupy Wall Street is what it seems.
Sure, the month-long protest has launched more passionate theories than any event since the publication of Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams.
With opinions so polarized, even at the New Republic, the smallest fragment of description can be interpreted like a political manifesto.
Nothing riles the demonstrators camping out in Zuccotti Park like the inaccurate charge that they are unwashed, shiftless hippies.
Instead, after three days of following the protests, I came to a different conclusion.
What struck me was the sincere and good-natured smallness of it all.
This is Walter Shapiro, accredited liberal journalist who's written for USA Today.
Now he's at the New Republic, but he's been everywhere.
Nothing I saw in New York this week justifies the current level of the whole world is watching media coverage, he writes.
At times in Zuccotti Park, there seem to be almost as many reporters, many of them from foreign news services, as overnight campers.
During the first full week in October, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism, one-third of the overall coverage of the economy centered on the Wall Street protests.
That seems as wildly out of whack as all those months when only a lonely band wrote about income inequality in America.
The idea of Occupy Wall Street so much larger than the actual reality at the place of its birth, maybe less than meets the eye, is an enduring theme uniting all 21st century political movements.
Tea Party, after all, was launched with little more than a primal scream on cable TV.
Anyway, he goes on to say that the mystery that will launch a thousand media seminars is this.
How did a modest encampment at Zuccotti Park morph in less than a month into a global news story?
You don't need a seminar to answer that.
All you need is an understanding of the media and its alliance with the Democrat Party.
It's a fraud.
It's a hoax.
It has been planned to distract people's attention from Obama and Washington and zero it in on Wall Street.
The media is a bunch of hippies from the 60s anyway.
They don't understand economics or anything else, but they understand protest.
And to them, it's idyllic.
This is nostalgia for them.
This is the 60s all over again.
Just wait till somebody throws a rock through a bank building window and then they'll really have an orgasm.
The final aspect is, this is Mr. Shapiro again, is that the Occupy Wall Street protests filled in a missing piece in the political puzzle.
Mark Schmidt shrewdly suggested liberals had long been fantasizing about a Tea Party of the left.
But I also think serious journalists have been waiting for some bellow of outrage over the way that Wall Street plutocrats have been laughing all the way to their annual bonuses.
So, Mr. Shapiro, outsom the media hates Wall Street.
The media wants Wall Street to go to jail.
The media has been waiting for somebody to pop up and do something.
And by hook or by crook, it's happened, and we have a story.
But its smallness is what everybody who goes down to it comments on.
How small it is.
How small the place is, how few the numbers of people are.
Mr. Shapiro says somebody in America had to get mad other than Elizabeth Warren.
Occupy Wall Street's a Roar Sock test.
If you're a true believer of the left, you can find something appealing in the well-intentioned and mostly well-behaved efforts of the protesters to call attention to economic injustice.
If you're a hardcore conservative, you can mock the demonstrators as easily as you can pillory a vegan food co-op.
Yeah, I haven't pilloried a vegan food co-op in a long time.
I got to start doing that again.
Pilloring a vegan food co-op.
Okay, we're going to go to the phones.
We're going to start in Demarest, Georgia.
This is Don.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Great to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate that.
Yeah, I just wanted to say on the Eric Canner statement, I didn't take it that way at all.
I took it as he's calling for an end to the job-killing regulation, heavy taxation, the Obama campaign.
Why didn't he say that?
Why did he say that then?
He didn't talk about it.
He said, the rich need to start spending their money here.
We agree that they need to start.
Did he talk about ending regulation somewhere else in the appearance?
He went on to say we have elected leaders in this town, he said, who are frankly joining in an effort to blame others rather than focusing on policies that have brought the current situation.
That's the part that you left out.
But did he say we need to end regulation?
Did you hear him?
Are you interpreting that?
That's what he meant.
I guess that's my own interpretation.
Okay.
Well, so Eric Cantor's appearance on Fox News is a Roar Suck test, too.
He's got to say something to the media.
The media is going to continue, as you said, the media is going to go ahead and control this and expand upon it and make it last as long as they can.
So, your own benefit.
He has to say something to the media?
The media is asking him.
Is he just going to stay there and not say anything?
Well.
Okay.
So the objective is to answer the questions so the media won't chase you anymore?
I'll agree with you on that aspect.
He could have been a little bit more forthcoming.
I think the media just picked up on that headline, though, but they didn't pick up on the part that I was saying.
Wait a minute.
The media didn't pick up.
I did.
Yes.
Now I am the media in certain circles.
But I didn't need anybody to media to pick up on that.
That happened all on its own.
I just.
Must be the consultants.
It must be somebody telling these guys that you.
What is the advice?
Look, you've got to sound like Democrats.
You've got to sound like Democrats.
You can't let the Democrats own this issue of income inequality.
You've got to get into this.
You've got to tell people that you care about it too.
You care about the poor.
The rich need to start spending more money and so forth.
He said came up with a new term for it.
Instead of income inequality, income mobility.
Anyway, I appreciate the call, Don.
I really do.
Christopher in Roseland, New Jersey, you're next.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
A little bit totally unrelated, but one of the best falafel carts in the city parks at Zuccotti Parks.
It's not that bad.
I just thought you might like to know that.
But hey, I was calling about the whole Class Act discussion that you were having.
Wait a second.
What is a colossal park?
So a falafel cart.
Falafel?
Falafel.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
There's great falafel there.
There's great falafel in Zuccotti Park.
There's a great sushi down there as well.
What's that?
Great sushi?
Yeah, yeah.
So it can't be that bad, right?
Oh, it's a vegan delight.
Cool.
Yeah.
Hey, on this whole Class Act thing, where is the public outcry going to be about this?
If people had really studied the Class Act when the health care legislation was being passed, they would know that this was nothing more than, to use an overused phrase, a Ponzi scheme.
The word savings has got to be used loosely when you relate the Class Act relative to the Affordable Act, because the way the plan was really going to work was people were going to put their premiums in for five years, and they couldn't get benefits for those first five years.
That's right.
So the government was going to take that money, and that's what they're calling savings in the overall health care.
Right.
Well, that's how they were doing everything in this healthcare plan.
The taxes started immediately, the benefits phased in over four to five years, and that's how they got the CBO to lie about this thing being revenue neutral or to come in under a trillion dollars.
So when does the CBO reprice it?
I mean, when did the public outcry come out that health care just went up 40% on Friday?
Our debt just went up 40% on Friday.
Don't look for it.
The story is being reported as it's a sad thing for the Obama administration that they had no choice, but they had to.
It's being blamed on the public.
There just weren't enough people volunteering to sign up.
You know, all this garbage about the Class Act being particularly meaningful to Senator Kennedy.
The Class Act was nothing more than a ruse.
Remember, they were using budget reconciliation to get a lot of the health care law passed.
And this Class Act was a ruse.
And it was a lie, and the CBO had to be in on the lie.
They tried to tell us that the Class Act, which was what the regime canceled on Friday, just pulled it out of Obamacare.
They tried to tell us that's where 40% of the savings in healthcare would come from.
But the problem is nobody signed up for it.
And it's the same thing with the high-risk pools.
The high-risk pools you're supposed to be able to get in these pools are going to be cheaper to get in the high-risk pools, and nobody's signing up for those either.
So this whole thing was a sham.
Fraud, hoax, scam, what have you.
The news that was going to come in under a trillion dollars, all of it was bogus, folks.
I'm just, I frankly am shocked that they pulled it.
Because what do they care that it's unfunded?
What do they care that it runs the deficit way up?
What the hell do they care?
This must be so bad that it's too much destruction too soon.
They had to pull it.
Because normally, this regime, as noted, this is what they're all about.
For them to admit they have to pull this out of there because it would not work.
There could be something else going on here, too.
I remember we talked about this two, maybe three weeks ago, that it's possible Obama wouldn't be unhappy at all if this thing is ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
So we'll see how it shakes out down the road.
Speaking of C, I told you so.
So I want to go back to me on this program on October 6th, talking about the Occupy Wall Street protests.
They've got to create the illusion that these protests are big, filled with energy, and for Obama, because nothing is happening spontaneously.
No knockout stories of Romney.
The smear of Perry, no accident.
Protests are needed because the economy sucks.
And these washouts would normally be protesting a Republican president who was responsible.
Now they're targeting Wall Street as if Wall Street's responsible for the failure of Obama's policies.
They're trying to blame the rich for these economic problems when it's Obama and they're targeting Romney as a Wall Street guy.
So I think part of the reason this was concocted was to take Romney out after seeing to it that he's the nominee.
I still stand by that.
I still think that that's one of the purposes of this.
And it's multifaceted, by the way.
The creation of Occupy Wall Street now.
Here is Axelrod from yesterday morning on this week on ABC.
Christiana Monpoor said, what about Occupy Wall Street then?
Is this something that'll benefit your party, benefit the president as he goes into reelection?
Well, that remains to be seen.
Obviously, I don't think any American is impressed when they see Governor Romney and all the Republican candidates say the first thing they do is roll back Wall Street reforms and go back to where we were before the crisis and let Wall Street write its own rules.
I think that will be an issue.
Let Wall Street write its own rules.
Nobody's writing their own rules except Obama.
Everybody's got regulations and hoops that they have to jump through, including these Wall Street guys.
They were the ones that were forced to make loans to people that could never pay them back.
Anyway, David Gregory on the Meet the Press Show he moderates.
David Gregory proclaimed Occupy Wall Street protests would dovetail nicely into a big message that the president's selling, which is that the wealthy should pay more.
That banner of going after Wall Street and the banks talking about unfairness that a lot of protesters are complaining about, that dovetails really nicely with Obama's message.
That's Gregory on Meet the Press yesterday.
Axelrod says, yeah, we're going to get Max's matches up.
Gregory admitting it.
We've got MSNBC and Rolling Stone journalists emailing with Occupy DC protesters, advising them on how to position their demands so that they look more reasonable and how to get coverage.
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration said that the IRS developed outreach plans to notify tanning salons that the 10% federal tax would be due on ultraviolet light services paid for as of July 1st, 2010.
What this story is about is while the agency updated tax forms and tax return processing systems to prepare for the new levy, the IRS had difficulty determining the actual number and contacts for businesses required to collect the new tax from customers at the tanning outfits, companies, salons.
The IRS initially projected that tax would be due quarterly from roughly 25,000 standalone tanning salons plus spas and health clubs and beauty parlors, but the Inspector General report found actual tax returns filed for the first three quarters, March 31st, averaged just above 10,300.
The bottom line here is tanning tax revenues have fallen short of estimates, which always happens because they never score this stuff dynamically.
They just assume that everybody keep going and everybody would just bend over, pay the tax.
Well, fewer people are visiting the tanning salons and fewer people therefore are paying the tanning tax.
And so the amount of money expected to be collected in the tanning tax is running way below what was projected.
Shazam.
Isn't it amazing how this all works out?
And I am so depressed today.
I just can't tell you.
I don't, well, there's a lot wrong.
But I found out, I found out over the weekend that one of my all time, this is such an unkind cut.
I found out that one of my all-time favorite comedians is not just a leftist.
He's a communist.
Professor Irwin Corey.
You remember Professor Irwin Corey?
Professor Irwin Corey is 97 years old.
He lives in Manhattan.
He has a shtick now.
He pretends to be homeless and he panhandles.
He hits people up in their cars for donations for a children's charity in Cuba.
And the New York Post had a little story on this over the weekend, a picture of the guy.
New York Times has done an expose of the guy.
He lives in a $3.5 million apartment.
He's not homeless.
He just is part of his shtick, but he's a well-known, he's a well-known anarchist communist.
There are pictures of him with Castro handing over money to this children's charity there.
Professor Irwin Corey is one of the reasons I used to stay up late as a kid to watch the tonight show.
So I'm doing show prep yesterday.
I read this and I find myself.
It's not just a leftist.
That'd be bad enough.
He's a full-fledged communist.
And then, what about the Steelers?
Severs didn't depress me.
No, that's...
But, you know, that's another thing.
Did you...
Have you seen the videotape of Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh?
Let me read something to you.
I'll find it here.
Oh, it's worse than that.
It's worse than that.
This is a clear example of how the leftist culture is just perverting everything it touches.
For those of you who didn't see, it was the Detroit Lions and the Fortuners at Ford Field.
And the Fortiners pull a game out the last minutes of the game, big road victory.
Jim Harbaugh, the rookie coach of the Fortiners, runs across the field like he's been launched from a missile silo.
He's got the exuberance of a college coach, runs across the field, grabs Schwartz's hand, the coach of the Lions, who's a good guy, by the way.
Jim Schwartz is a good guy.
Trust me, don't doubt me.
Shakes Schwartz's hand apparently very hard and slaps him on the back with apparently a lot of force, so much so that Schwartz, you can see it, just looks shocked.
What the hell?
Looked around.
And then there must have been something said because Schwartz started chasing Harbaugh all the way half of the way down the field to the locker room entrance.
And the cameras followed this stuff.
And it was Fortuner security people and PR guys who were keeping Schwartz away from Harbaugh.
And Harbaugh was looking around and they were shouting at each other.
And the media has just had a cow over this.
The media is acting like this is the greatest transgression and the sorriest thing that's ever happened for our poor innocent little children to see.
Our kids are killing each other on the streets.
And the media is upset with what happened here, the way these two coaches behaved.
Members of the media, members of the sports media are demanding fines that these two coaches be made to produce television PSAs on sportsmanship and that these two coaches make a tour of public schools to apologize for their actions, to suggest that it was wrong and it was the wrong message to send to kids, and to basically ask for forgiveness and to apologize from now to the end of the season for what kids had to see in the post-game of the Fortiner Lions game.
Because, you know, we got conflict resolution and this cuts cuts against a grain of conflict resolution, these two guys.
What a horrible.
It's football for crying out loud.
It was a great game.
It was one of the best games of the weekend.
And two surprised teams.
The Lions were undefeated.
A lot of emotion in this game.
But now we've got all these suggestions that these guys record PS, that the NFL fine them tens of thousands of dollars and put them on television PSAs and then make them tour the schools of politics.
Can you imagine these two guys going into a school apologizing for what they did?
And these kids looking around saying, you know, I just slapped my buddy upside the head and I cut off his ear this morning and they're apologizing to me for this.
And nobody even swung at each other.
Anybody?
Just sit here and watch the deterioration of everything that used to be great.
To just sit here and have to watch it.
I'm telling you, folks, it's depressing.
I tell you, Erwin Corey, Professor Erwin Corey, he was so bad a communist that the Communist Party rejected him as being too radical.
One of my all-time favorite companies.
Do you realize what a kick in the gut this was?
Hey, you got President Obama running around saying, hey, if they bring a knife, we bring a gun.
Get in their face.
Republicans want people to die.
And the sports media is out telling us we need to have two football coaches do PSAs and pay fines and run around to a public school tour of I'm sorry.
Okay, let me change subject.
You know, we're having fun here at our little tea company, 2 If by T.
And I told you, one of the reasons that I started this company with Catherine and I started, I want to actually have some experience hands-on in starting a business in the Obama climate.
Just to find out what kind of regulations and stuff.
And I have to tell you, just to put together a contest requires a month and a half with lawyers because of all the regulations that refer to the website, what we say on the radio about it.
I mean, it is an absolute, which is ridiculous.
Just to put together a contest to give away some prizes.
Sorry if I sound mad.
I'm not mad about that.
I'm just depressed.
You remember, you remember when Obama told the American people the days of going to Las Vegas are over?
Well, Las Vegas has suffered ever since.
You see, the unemployment rate in Las Vegas is 15.9%.
So for us, at 2IF by T, Las Vegas is open for business, and we want to send you.
We're running a lot of promotional contests in conjunction with the Republican presidential debates as they unfold.
And there's one coming up in Vegas if they all don't boycott it now.
Who is it?
Huntsman's boycotting it because of some reason.
And there's a pressure on all the Republicans to boycott the, oh, because they want to move their primary up.
But it won't stop us.
What we're going to do is send a lucky winner to Las Vegas.
Las Vegas is open for business, is what we're calling it.
Anybody that purchases a case of tea from right now through 11:59 p.m. tomorrow, October the 18th, at 2ifbytea.com.
By the way, that's Pacific time.
So if you're in the Eastern time zone, you've got to almost 3 o'clock in the morning.
But if you buy a case of tea from right now through October 18th at 11.59 p.m. Pacific time, you're automatically entered to win it.
Grand Prize winner gets a three-day, two-night trip for two to Las Vegas.
This prize includes airfare, hotel room at a well-known, prestigious hotel.
You know, I don't stay in dumps, and neither do people who win my contests.
It's not going to be a dump, and it's not going to be a wedding chapel hotel either.
It's going to be a top-draw place.
Three days, two-night trip for two to Las Vegas, airfare, hotel room at a well-known, prestigious hotel, and credit towards meals.
And if you are the grand prize winner, we've checked.
We went through the regulatory hoops.
We've checked if you want to gift the prize to a friend, you can.
If by chance you can't fly, for example, if you're the winner and you can't travel and you want to gift it, you can do that.
But there are going to be a lot of chances to win.
There'll be a total of 100 lucky winners.
Second place will receive a $1,000 gas card.
Other prizes include a limited edition 8x10 autographed photo of me, not signed by a machine, but actually signed by me.
So to be automatically entered to win, go to 2ifbytea.com or call 866-662-1776.
All the official rules can be found on the website in case anything is misunderstood.
You have to order between now and 11.59 p.m., October 18th, to be entered at 2ifbytea.com or 866-662-1776.
There's an added bonus, by the way.
The tea is the best damn tea you'll ever taste.
Okay, another exciting excursion into Broadcast Excellence.
Another hour is in the can.
Don't sweat it.
We still have another one left to go here.
We'll get to it as soon as we get back from the top of the hour and your local news or whatever happens here at the local break at the top of the hour on your EIB affiliate.
See you soon, folks.
▲
Export Selection