We're back, Rush Lindball behind the golden EIB microphone on the cutting edge of societal evolution.
If you listen to regularly, you're going to be ahead of the trends because we are ahead of the trends.
You'll know it before it happens.
It's my job, men.
800 282-2882.
If you want to be on the program email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
Want to go back and air for you.
Eric Cantor from the House Republican leadership.
This was yesterday on Fox News Sunday.
We know in this country right now that there is a complaint about folks at the top end of the income scales.
If they make too much and too many don't make enough.
Well, we need to go encourage those at the top of the income scale to actually put their money to work to create more jobs so that we can see a closing of the gap.
You know, we're about income mobility, and that's what we should be focused on to take care of the income disparity in this country.
Okay.
Not to be repetitive, but if you're just joining us, that's yesterday, Fox News Sunday.
The Democrats, as an agenda item, have been harping on the rich get richer, the poor get poorer, this widening gap between the two groups.
And Obama has been saying that the rich need to start spending more money.
Invest in jobs.
Stop hoarding the cash.
No, it's Republicans.
Why be different?
You know what?
We find a problem with it too.
We need they think we think the rich ought to be spending their money more.
This is fear.
And I said when I played the soundbite that Romney has uh has done something similar, and it's on this.
I found the story from a blogger Walter or Warner Todd Houston only days ago.
Mitt Romney was saying that the Occupy Wall Streeters were dangerous, but true to his penchant to grow in his opinion, which means to flip-flop.
Romney is now beginning to accept the Occupy Wall Street theme of the 99%.
Ronlissey was uh to the during the first week of October, Romney was pounding Occupy Whatever's is dangerous.
All it took for Romney to begin his flip-flopping or growing was one week because now in a town hall in Hopkinton, New Hampshire.
Suddenly Romney is all about understanding the plight of the 99%.
We have to understand them.
So for some reason, well, I know what the reason is it's fear.
Um the protests and this assault on the rich orchestrated by the Democrats as the reason for all things wrong in this country.
The Republicans have decided that they've got to get in on that action.
By hook or by crook.
Now we know everybody's poll-driven.
In Washington, do they have polling data which tells them that the majority of people in the country sympathize with the Occupy Wall Street people?
They have polling data that tells them that the public agrees with the Occupy Wall Street protests.
And therefore they better not be left behind, the Republicans.
They better start saying things that indicate they are sympatico.
See it somewhat similarly.
Why else do this?
Okay, if they get to say watching TV.
So you think they're being moved by what they see on TV.
Okay, moved by the pictures, afraid of the pictures.
But it's all a hoax.
But they can't they can't afford to take the chance that it's not a hoax.
They have to, they have to roll a dice and maybe this is real.
These people we want to get re-elected, and we don't want to be in the 1%.
Or what have you.
Our guys.
You know, you know, they don't care whether it's a hoax or not.
Especially front runner.
Doesn't care if it's a hoax or not.
If it's what's on TV, it's what has to be reacted to.
Or if the public perception, whether it's right or wrong, and if it's on TV, then, okay, we have to act like we hear you.
And we're with you.
So while Obama is out trying to organize this bunch, he's, by the way, responsible for this.
This is Obama's protest to counter the Tea Party.
They're jealous.
The Democrats are so jealous of Tea Party they can't see straight.
This kind of thing is not spontaneous.
They didn't bubble up out of nothing.
This didn't bubble up out of genuine passion.
Like the Tea Party did.
They've had to create this.
They've had to pay for it.
They're advertising for protest.
And even that, the numbers of people showing up are not that big.
I gotta let me let me uh find this.
It's a uh a piece by Walter Shapiro in the New Republic.
He says, uh, one of the major points about this is that it isn't that big.
The number of people involved in this thing are not that many.
Now, wouldn't you know it?
I thought I had it in the stack.
I've got a separate Occupy Wall Street stack.
And I know I put it in here.
I'll have to find it for you.
But Walter Shapiro used to write for USA Today is a typical um left-wing journalist.
And also, do you know that the uh this probably will not surprise you, the Andrew Breitbart has uh dug this one up that journalists are advising the protesters.
Emails have been found.
Journalists at MSNBC and some guy named uh uh Matt Taibi.
At some uh Dylan Radigan at M SNBC and Matt Taibi are sending emails back and forth with organizers telling them how to position their demands, that they've got to have some demands, how they can improve their coverage.
This whole thing is a construct of the media Democrat complex, industrial complex.
Occupy DC emails show mainstream media Dylan Radican working with protesters to craft message.
Dana Locha has actually written about it.
Big journalism has learned that the Occupy Washington, D.C. movement is working with well-known media members to craft its demands and messaging while these media members report on the movement.
Someone has made the emails from Occupy DC email beastroad public and searchable.
The names in the list are a veritable who's who in the media.
Dylan Radical, Matt Radigan, Matt Taiebi from Rolling Stone.
Noam Chomsky, Bill Moyers.
All of these so-called journalists are advising via email, the organizers of the DC protest, how to position their demands and what to say.
That doesn't matter.
Rush, it's on television and it's on television, and it looks like people are sympathetic to it.
We Republicans have to react to it.
We can't just sit here and be critical.
You can teach.
You can try to inform and educate people.
But see, that's not what this bunch is about.
This bunch is about making no waves, trying to capitalize as much as they can.
Make sure that the impression Republicans are mean, selfish stuff so and so is not true.
Go out of our way.
Anyway, same old, same old.
I gotta take a break.
We'll come back and get your call started right after this.
Don't go away.
Here's that Walter Shapiro piece from the New Republic, a truth about Occupy Wall Street.
It's much smaller than it seems, with tensions at a fever pitch, and TV viewers from Laos To Lapland glued to their sets.
And therein lies the reason.
Our guys are caving on this.
With tensions at a fever pitch and TV viewers from Laos to Lapland glued to their sets.
The Occupy Wall Street protesters won a last minute reprieve Friday morning from Mayor Boomberg's demand that they vacate Zuccotti Park for cleanup.
By the way, the guy that owns Zuccotti Park is in bed with Obama and clean energy plans.
Somebody's on the board of directors.
It's just crony capitalism.
The web of deceit.
So intricately woven.
Here that it's uh it's possible to unravel it, and when you do, you just you you find that this whole thing is a Democrat construct.
From viewing fragmentary photos and glancing at the headlines, the uninitiated might imagine that this spot was a pristine green sword before the protest, not a chance.
Devoid of natural beauty and not surrounded by any obvious symbols of capitalism, let you count Brooks brothers.
This narrow block long open space.
Zuccotti Park boasts all the charm of a strip mall parking lot.
The fruit of a real estate deal that dates back to the troubled era when John Lenzi was mayor and New York was laughingly dubbed Fun City.
Zuccotti Park is an unlikely setting for anything, let alone the purported rebirth of the American left.
I thought it was going to be a grass park, said Aaron McEwen.
A community college student on sabbatical who's part of the protest.
I thought it was going to be a grass park.
It's not, it's cement.
Matt Smith, a bearded tourist from New Zealand who spent four days camping with the protesters radiated a similar sense of puzzlement.
When I spoke with him on Monday, I was expecting to be on Wall Street itself.
Nothing about Occupy Wall Street is what it seems.
Sure.
The month-long protest has launched more passionate theories than any event since the publication of Freud's The Interpretation of Dreams.
With opinions so polarized, even at the New Republic, the smallest fragment of description can be interpreted like a political manifesto.
Nothing riles the demonstrators camping out in Zuccotti Park like the inaccurate charge that they are unwashed, shiftless hippies.
Instead, after three days of following the protests, I came to a different conclusion.
What struck me was the sincere and good natured smallness of it all.
This is Walter Shapiro, a credited liberal journalist who's written for USA Today.
Now he's a new republic, but he's been everywhere.
Nothing I saw in New York this week justifies the current level of the whole world is watching media coverage.
He writes.
At times in Zuccotti Park, there seem to be almost as many reporters, many of them from foreign news services as overnight campers.
During the first full week in October, according to the Project for Excellence in Journalism, one third of the overall coverage of the economy centered on the Wall Street protests.
That seems as wildly out of whack as all those months when only a lonely band wrote about income inequality in America.
The idea of Occupy Wall Street so much larger than the actual reality at the place of its birth, maybe less than meets the eye is an enduring theme uniting all twenty first century political movements.
Tea Party, after all, was launched with little more than a primal scream on cable TV.
Anyway, he goes on to say that the mystery that will launch a thousand media seminars is this.
How did a monest encampment at Zuccotti Park morph in less than a month into a global news story?
You don't need a seminar to answer that.
All you need is an understanding of the media and its alliance with the Democrat Party.
It's a fraud.
It's a hoax.
It has been planned to distract people's attention from Obama and Washington and zero it in on Wall Street.
The media is a bunch of hippies from the sixties anyway.
They don't understand economics or anything else, but they understand protest.
And to them it's idyllic.
This is nostalgia for them.
This is the sixties all over again.
Just wait till somebody throws a rock through a bank building window, and then they'll really have an orgasm.
The final aspect is it's Mr. Shapiro again, is that the Occupy Wall Street protests filled in a missing piece in the political puzzle.
Mark Schmidt shrewdly suggested liberals had long been fantasizing about a Tea Party of the left.
But I also think serious journalists have been waiting for some bellow of outrage over the way that Wall Street plutocrats have been laughing all the way to their annual bonuses.
So, Mr. Shapiro outsom.
The media hates Wall Street.
The media wants Wall Street to go to jail.
The media's been waiting for somebody to pop up and do something.
And by hook or by crook, it's happened, and we have a story.
But it's smallness.
Is what everybody who goes down to it comments on.
How small it is.
How small the place is, how few the numbers of people are.
Mr. Shapiro says somebody in America had to get mad, other than Elizabeth Warren.
Occupy Wall Street's aurorsock test.
If you're true believer of the left, you can find something appealing in the well-intentioned and mostly well-behaved efforts of the protesters to call attention to economic injustice.
If you're hardcore conservative, you can mock the demonstrators as easily as you can pillory a vegan food co-op.
Yeah, I haven't pillaried a vegan food co-op in a long time.
I gotta start doing that again.
Pillaring a vegan food co-op.
Okay, we're gonna go to the phones.
We're gonna start in Demaris, Georgia.
This is Don.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Great to talk to you.
Thank you very much, sir.
Appreciate that.
Yeah, I just wanted to say one of the Eric Canner uh statements.
I didn't take it that way at all.
Uh I took it as he's calling for an end to the job killing regulation, heavy taxation, Obama game.
Why didn't he say that?
Why did he say that then?
He didn't talk about it in the he said with the rich need to start spending their money here.
We agree that they need to start.
Did he did he talk about ending regulation somewhere else in the appearance?
He he went on to say we have elected leaders in this town, he said, to who are frankly joining in an effort to blame others rather than focusing on policies that have brought the current situation.
That's the part that you left out.
But did he say we need to end regulation?
Did you hear him say are you interpreting that that's what he meant?
I guess that's my own interpretation.
Okay.
Well, so Eric Cantor's appearance on Fox News is a Rorsock test, too.
Um he's got to say something to the media.
The media is going to continue, as you said.
The media is going to go ahead and control this and expand upon it and make it last as long as they can.
So your own benefit.
Uh he has to say something to the media.
The media's asking them.
Is he just going to stay there and not say anything?
Well.
Okay.
So the objective is to answer the question so the media won't chase you anymore.
Uh, I'll agree with you on that aspect.
He could have been a little bit more forthcoming.
I think the media just picked up on that headline, though.
But they didn't pick up on the part that I'm waiting.
The media didn't pick up.
I did.
Yes.
Now I am the media in uh in certain circles.
But I didn't need anybody to media to pick up on that.
That happened all its own.
I just must be the consultants.
It must be somebody telling these guys that you've what is the advice?
Look, you gotta sound like Democrats.
You've got to sound like Democrats.
You gotta it you can't let the Democrats own this issue of income inequality.
You've got to get in on this.
You've got to tell people you care about it too.
You care about the poor.
You the rich need to start spending more money and so forth.
He said it came up with a new term for it.
Instead of income inequality, income mobility.
Anyway, I appreciate the call, Don.
I really do.
Christopher in uh in Rosalind, New Jersey, you're next.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush.
A little bit totally unrelated, uh, but one of the best philosophers in the city parks at Zuccadi Parks.
It's not that bad.
I just thought you might like to know that.
But hey, I was calling about the whole Class Act discussion that you were having.
Wait a second.
What is a colossal park?
No, a falafel cart.
Falafel.
Oh, okay, okay.
Great falafel there.
There's great phalapolized park.
Is there great sushi down there as well?
What's that?
Great sushi.
Yeah, yeah.
So it can't be that bad, right?
So it's a vegan delight.
Cool.
Yeah.
Hey, uh, on this whole Class Act thing, uh, where where is the public outcry going to be about this?
If people had really studied the Class Act when the health care legislation was being passed, they would know that this was nothing more than use an overused phrase, a Ponzi scheme.
Uh the word savings has got to be used loosely when you relate the Class Act relative to uh the Affordable Act.
Because the way the plan was really going to work was people were going to put their premiums in for five years, and they couldn't get benefits for those first five years.
That's right.
So the government was going to take that money, and that's what they're calling savings in the overall health care.
Right.
Well, that's how they were doing everything in this health care plan.
That's the taxes started immediately, the benefits phased in over four to five years, and that's how they got the CBO to lie about this thing being revenue neutral or to come in under a trillion dollars.
So about it when does the CBO replace it?
I mean, when does the public outcry come out that health care just went up 40% on Friday?
Our debt just went up 40% on Friday.
Don't look for it.
The story is being reported as it's a sad thing for the Obama administration that they had no choice uh but they they had to it's it's really being blamed on the public.
There just weren't enough people volunteering to sign up.
You know, all this all this garbage about the class act being particularly meaningful to Senator Kennedy.
The Class Act was nothing more than a ruse.
Remember, they were using budget reconciliation to get a lot of the health care law passed.
And this class act was a ruse.
And it was a lie, and the CBO had to be in on the line.
They tried to tell us that the Class Act, which was what the regime canceled on Friday, just pulled it out of Obamacare.
They tried to tell us that's where 40% of the savings in health care would come from.
But the problem is nobody signed up for it.
And it's just the same thing with the high-risk pools.
The high-risk pools you're supposed to be able to get in in uh in these pools are gonna be cheaper to get in the high-risk pools, and nobody signing up for those either.
So this whole thing was a sham.
Fraud, hoax, scam, what have you.
The news that was gonna come in under a trillion dollars, all of it was bogus, folks.
I'm just I frankly am shocked that they pulled it.
Because what do they care that it's unfunded?
What do they care that it runs the deficit way up?
What the hell do they care?
This must be so bad that it's too much destruction too soon.
They had to pull it.
Because normally this regime, as noted, this is what they're all about.
For them to admit they have to pull this out of there because uh it it it it would it would not work.
Is this it could be something else going on here, too?
Like I remember we talked about this two, maybe three weeks ago.
That it's possible Obama wouldn't be unhappy at all.
If this thing is is ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
So we'll see how it shakes out down the road.
Uh speaking of C, I told you so, so I want to go back to me on this program on October 6th, talking about the Occupy Wall Street protests.
So you gotta create the illusion that these protests are big, filled with energy, and for Obama.
Because nothing is happening spontaneously.
No knockout stories of Romney.
The smear of Perry, no accident.
Protests are needed because the economy sucks.
And these washouts would normally be protesting a Republican president who was responsible.
Now they're targeting Wall Street as if Wall Street's responsible for the failure of Obama's policies.
They're trying to blame the rich for these economic problems when it's Obama and they're targeting Romney as a Wall Street guy.
So I think part of the reason this was concocted was to take Romney out after seeing to it that he's the nominee.
I still stand by that.
I still think that that's one of the purposes of this, and it's multifaceted, by the way, the creation of Occupy Wall Street now.
Here uh is is uh Axelrod from yesterday morning on this week on ABC, Christian Amon Poor said, uh what about Occupy Wall Street then?
Is this something that'll benefit your party?
Benefit the president as he goes into re-election.
Well, that remains to be seen.
Obviously, I don't think any American is impressed when they see uh Governor Romney and all the Republican candidates say the first thing they do is roll back uh Wall Street reforms and go back to where we were before the crisis and let Wall Street write its own rules.
I think that will be an issue.
Such Wall Street write its own rules.
Nobody's writing their own rules except Obama.
Everybody's got regulations and hoops that they have to jump through, including these Wall Street guys.
They were the ones that were forced to make loans to people that could never pay them back.
Anyway, David Gregory on to the the uh Meet the Pressure he moderates.
Uh David Gregory proclaimed Occupy Wall Street protests would dovetail nicely into a big message that the president's selling, which is that the wealthy should pay more.
That banner of going after Wall Street and the banks talking about unfairness that a lot of protesters are complaining about.
That dovetail dovetails really nicely with Obama's message.
That's Gregory on the Meet the Press yesterday.
Little Axelrod says, yeah, I think it matches up.
Gregory admitting it.
We've got MSNBC and Rolling Stone journalists emailing with uh occupied DC protesters advising them on how to position their demands so that they look more reasonable and how to get coverage.
The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration said that the IRS developed outreach plans to notify tanning salons that the 10% federal tax would be due on ultraviolet light services paid for as of July 1st, 2010.
What this story is about is uh while the agency updated tax forms and tax return processing systems to prepare for the new levy, the IRS had difficulty determining the actual number and contacts for businesses required to collect the new tax from customers at the tanning outfits at companies, salons.
The IRS initially projected the tax would be due quarterly from roughly 25,000 standalone tanning salons, plus spas and health clubs and beauty parlors, but the inspector general report found actual tax returns filed for the first three quarters March 31st averaged just above 10,300.
The bottom line here is tanning tax revenues have fallen short of estimates, which always happens because they never score this stuff dynamically.
They just assume that everybody keep going, and everybody had just been over, pay pay the tax.
Well, fewer people are visiting the tanning salons, and fewer people therefore are paying the tanning tax, and so the amount of money expected to be collected in the tanning tax is running way below what was projected.
Shazam, isn't it amazing how this all works out?
And I tell you, I am so depressed today.
I can't I just can't tell you.
I don't I well, there's a lot wrong.
But I I found out, I found out over the weekend that one of my all-time, this is such an unkind cut.
I found out that one of my all-time favorite comedians is not just a leftist.
He's a communist.
Professor Erwin Corey.
You remember Professor Erwin Corey?
Professor Irwin Corey is 97 years old.
He lives in Manhattan.
He has a shtick now.
He pretends to be homeless.
And he panhandles.
He hits people up in their cars for donations for a children's charity in Cuba.
And the uh New York Post had a little story on this over the week in a picture of the guy.
New York Times has done an expose of the guy.
He lives in a three and a half million dollar apartment.
He's not homeless.
He just is just part of his shtick.
But he's a well-known, I didn't think he's a well-known anarchist communist.
He's he's there are pictures of him with Castro handing over money to this children's charity there.
Professor Irwin Corey is one of the reasons they used to stay up late as a kid to watch the Tonight Show.
So I'm I'm doing show prep yesterday.
I read this and I find it's not just a leftist.
That'd be bad enough.
He's a full-fledged communist.
And then what about the Steelers?
Steelers didn't depress me.
No, that's but you know, sit that's another thing.
Did you have you seen the video tape of Jim Schwartz and Jim Harbaugh going?
Let me let me let me read something to you.
I find it here.
Oh, it's worse than that.
It's worse than that.
Uh this is a clear example of how the leftist culture is just perverting everything it touches.
For those of you who didn't see, it was the Detroit Lions and the Forders at Ford Field.
And the Fortners pull a game out the last minutes of the game, big road victory.
Jim Harbaugh, the rookie coach of the Fordners, runs across the field like he's been launched from a missile silo.
He's got the exuberance of a college coach, runs across the field, grabs Schwartz's hand, the coach of the Lions, is a good guy, by the way.
Jim Schwartz is a good guy, trust me, don't demonstrate, shakes Schwartz's hand apparently very hard and slaps him on the back with appearing a lot of force, so much so that Schwartz, you can see it, just look shocked.
What the hell?
Looked around, and then there must have been something said because Schwartz started chasing Harbaugh all the way half of the way down the field to the locker room entrance.
And the cameras followed this stuff, and it was Fordiner security people and PR guys who were keeping Schwartz away from Harbaugh.
And the media has just had a cow over this.
The media is acting like this is the gravest transgression and the sorriest thing that's ever happened for our poor innocent little children to see.
Our kids are killing each other on the streets, and the media is upset with what's happened here, the way these two coaches behaved.
Members of the media, members of the sports media are demanding fines that these two coaches be made to produce television PSAs on sportsmanship, and that these two coaches make a tour of public schools to apologize for their actions to suggest that it was wrong and it was the wrong message to send the kids and to basically ask for forgiveness and to apologize from now to the end of the season for what kids had to see in the post-game of the Fortner Lions game.
Because you know, we got conflict resolution, and this went this this cutch cuts against a grain of conflict resolution, these two guys.
What a horrible It's football for crying out loud.
It was a great game.
It was it was one of the best games of the weekend, and you've two surprised teams.
The Lions were undefeated.
A lot of emotion in this game.
But now we've got all these suggestions that these guys record PS that the NFL fine them tens of thousands of dollars and put them on television PSAs and then make them tour the schools apologize.
Can you imagine these two guys going into a school apologizing what they did, and these kids looking around and saying, you know, I just slapped my buddy upside the head and I cut off his ear this morning, and they're apologizing to me for this.
And nobody even swung at each other anybody.
Just sit here and watch the deterioration of everything that used to be great.
To just sit here and have to watch it.
I'm telling you, folks, it's depressing.
Erwin Corey, Professor Erwin Corey.
He was so bad a communist that the Communist Party rejected him as being too radical.
One of my all-time favorite communities.
Do you realize what a kick in the gut this was?
You got President Obama running around saying, Hey, if they bring a knife, we bring a gun.
Get in their face.
Republicans want people to die.
And the sports media is out telling us we need to have two football coaches do PSAs and pay fines and run around to a public school tour of I'm sorry.
Okay, let me change subject.
You know, we um we're having fun here at our little tea company, two if by tea.
And I told you one of the reasons that I started this company with Catherine and I started, I want to actually have some experience, hands on in starting a business in the Obama climate.
Just to find out what what kind of regulations and stuff, and I have to tell you, just to put together a contest requires a month and a half with lawyers.
Because of all the regulations are referred to on the website, what we say on the radio about it.
I mean, it is an absolute, which it's ridiculous.
Just to put together a contest to give away some prizes.
Sorry if I sound mad.
I'm not mad about that.
I'm just depressed.
You remember.
You remember when uh when Obama told the American people of days ago into Las Vegas are over.
Well, Las Vegas has suffered ever since.
You've seen the unemployment rate of Las Vegas is 15.9%.
So for us, at 2 If By T, Las Vegas is open for business and we want to send you.
We're running a lot of promotion and contests in conjunction with the Republican presidential debates as they unfold.
And there's one coming up in Vegas, if they all don't boycott it now.
Who is it?
Huntsman's boycotting it because of some reason.
And there's a pressure on all the Republicans to boycott the oh, because they want to move their primary up.
But it won't stop us.
What we're gonna do is send a lucky winner to Las Vegas.
Las Vegas is open for business, is what we're calling it.
Anyone that purchased a case of tea from right now through 11.59 p.m. tomorrow, October the 18th at 2ifbytea.com.
That's that by the way, that's Pacific time.
So if you're in the Eastern time zone, you've got to almost 3 o'clock in the morning.
But if you buy a case of tea from right now through October 18th at 11.59 p.m. Pacific time, you're automatically entered to win it.
A grand prize winner gets a three-day two-night trip for two to Las Vegas.
This prize includes airfare, hotel room, and a well-known prestigious hotel.
You know I don't stay in dumps, and neither do people who win my contests.
It's not going to be a dump, and it's not going to be a wedding chapel hotel either.
It's going to be a top draw place.
Three days, two-night trip for two to Las Vegas, airfare, hotel room at a well-known prestigious hotel, and credit towards meals.
And if you are the grand prize winner.
We've checked.
We went through the regulatory hoops.
We've checked if you want to gift the prize to a friend.
You can.
If by chance you can't fly, for example.
If you're the winner and you can't travel when you want to gift it, you can do that.
But there are going to be a lot of chances to win.
There'll be a total of 100 lucky winners.
Second place will receive a $1,000 gas card.
Other prizes include a limited edition 8x10 autograph photo of me, not signed by a machine, but actually signed by me.
So to be automatically entered to win, go to 2ifyT.com or call 866 662 1776.
All the official rules can be found on the website in case anything is misunderstood.
You have to order between now and 1159 p.m.
October 18th to be entered at 2ifbyt.com or 866-662-1776.
There's an added bonus, by the way.
The tea is the best damn tea you'll ever taste.
Okay, another exciting excursion into broadcast excellence.
Another hour is in the can.
Don't sweat it.
We still have another one left to go here.
We'll get to it as soon as we get back from the top of the hour and your local news or whatever happens here at the local break at the top of the hour on your EIB affiliate.