All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:39
September 30, 2011, Friday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
In every story that you see about this dead terrorist in Yemen.
Well, what do you see in every American born?
American born.
Why do you think such a big deal is being made out of that?
In the drive by media.
It's Friday, folks.
Great to have you here.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep, yep.
Yahoo!
Here we are.
It's the end of the week.
It's open line Friday.
It's the greatest career risk taken by any major media figure ever.
Turning over the all-important content portion of the program to rank amateurs.
Lovable rank amateurs.
Only one highly trained broadcast specialist here.
That's me.
And on Friday, open line Friday, it's a tradition.
Whatever you want to talk about is fine.
That's not the case Monday through Thursday.
Monday through Thursday, you have to talk about something I'm interested in, or you um you won't make it.
But on Friday, if necessary, I'll fake it, or I'll act like I don't care.
Whatever.
It's your chance to make a comment.
Ask a question.
Whatever, that uh you think maybe something hasn't been discussed that should be.
So go for it.
Uh snerdily standing by, waiting to insult you at 800-282-2882.
So uh even as we speak, Barack Hussein Obama, the floundering president of the United States, spiking the ball, dancing in the end zone in Fort Myers, Florida about how he killed Alaki.
Yeah, and it's time to get those poll numbers back up.
There's Bin Laden two here.
Now the the ACLU is not happy that this terrorist has been killed.
The uh the headline for the top story at the ACLU's website, American Citizen and War Alaki killed without judicial process.
They're upset.
The ACLU upset at Obama, taking on an American citizen like this without uh without due process.
Anyway, great to have you here, folks, as uh as we wrap up another big week of broadcast excellence.
Dick Durbin says they don't have the votes for Obama's jobs bill in the Senate.
They never were going to have the votes.
They don't ever intend to vote on this in the Senate.
That's not the point.
In fact, Durban even goes so far, this is a story out of our blowtorch affiliate Chicago WLS, goes so far as to say that that uh it really is a tax bill.
This is a huge C I told you so on several levels.
On Tuesday, President Obama tried to keep the pressure on Congress to consider his uh 450 billion dollar jobs bill, saying it had been two weeks since he sent the bill at Capitol Hill, and now I want it back.
I want it back passed so I can sign this bill and start putting people back to work.
So why have the Democrats delayed action?
Well, Bill Cameron, WLS Chicago reports that Obama's own party has delayed action in the Senate, and he talked to Dick Turbin about it.
And uh and Turbin told WLS look, the oil-producing state senators don't like eliminating or reducing the subsidy for oil companies.
Really?
You mean to tell me that after all of this hubbub, Obama running around saying we gotta stop subsidizing big oil, that there are some Democrat senators who don't want to get rid of the subsidy.
Mary Landrew is first in line, that's right from Louisiana.
Right.
And uh they just they're never gonna vote for a tax increase.
There's some senators who are up for election who say I'm never gonna vote for a tax increase while I'm up for election, Durbin said.
Even on the wealthiest people, I'm not gonna vote for a tax increase.
Oh I mean, it is a slapdown of major proportions on Chicago Radio.
Where, of course, Obama's uh hometown.
So so we're not gonna have a hundred percent Democrat senators voting for this thing, Durbin said.
That's why it needs to be bipartisan, and I hope we can find some Republicans who will join us to uh to make it happen.
In other words, we need some political cover for this debacle.
Nobody's going to vote for Obama's tax increase bill, which is what Durbin has just essentially admitted it is.
Well, with friends like this, you know, Obama needs to start hanging around with Bev Purdue.
This is uh this is in the real world, everything is collapsing on Obama now.
You go to the Drudge home page, and there's a side-by-side picture of Chris Christie and uh and Obama.
Obama 44%, Chris Christie 43%.
I would I'm gonna make an offer right now.
Any polling company, I will pay for it.
Do a poll, Mickey Mouse versus Obama.
I'll talk to Drudge.
I think I convince him to run it.
You go out and do a poll, Obama versus Mickey Mouse, and I'll pay for the poll, get the results, and we'll plaster them everyone because every day it's a different Obama versus Paul, Obama, Christie, Obama, Palin, Obama, whatever.
And it's uh it's neck and neck.
Just throw Mickey Mouse in there.
Well, of course it has to be a legitimate polling company.
Well, you think I'm you think I'm asking for some fraudulent company here to do the poll?
Just promised what?
Oh, oh, oh, uh, oh, you're thinking a bunch of flyby nights are gonna take me up and do a poll and send me the bill.
That's not how it's gonna happen.
There has to be a contract, pre-arranged agreement and so forth.
Lawyers happen to be involved.
And I you know, you are overly protective and concerned.
And I know you're you think there's a bunch of fly-by-night charlatans out there.
We know how to deal with it.
So Durbin has conceded in this piece that Democrats don't have the votes in the Senate to pass it.
Not at the moment.
I don't think we do, but eh, we can work on it.
Now, this shouldn't be a surprise.
This jobs bill, as Obama refers to it, is nothing more, folks, than a carbon copy of the budget proposal he sent Congress back in May, which did not get a single Democrat vote.
It's an idea this, as I tell you, these tax increases in this jobs bill are what he has been having dreams over.
Speaking of, it has gotten so bad.
They had to send Muchell out there in a in a in a Lady Gaga type getup.
She went shopping at Target.
Have you seen the pictures of this?
Now, folks, I looked at what's in her shopping cart, and I saw a spray bottle of Lysol.
Don't ask me how I know what Lysol is.
I know what Lysol is.
I haven't bought any myself at the store, but I see it under the sink where people use it.
And I'm thinking to myself, do they really need to send the first lady to Target?
Which is, by the way, a non-union shop.
They have to really send the first lady to Target for Lysol for the White House.
What a phony baloney, plastic banana, good time rock and roller optic photo op this was.
That's right, the White House tipped off an AP report.
How else you think AP has photographers just stationed at Target stores waiting for Muchell to show up?
Of course they were tipped off, which is something else.
Some other Democrat, first lady or whatever, went to a uh a store somewhere and they've never tipped off.
She's gonna be there.
I can't remember.
This is it's it's SOP, standard operating procedure.
So the AP reporter gets the phone going, hey, by the way, uh Michelle Obama at the target store.
Show up between here and there and get a picture.
I think we are.
What kind of uh, yeah, I guess it's supposed to make us forget the vacations, but we're actually supposed to believe that she's out buying Lysol.
For the White House.
Remember Sarah Palin that says Sarah Pitten got hell for going to Walmart.
They they accused Sarah Palin of cheap uh opportunism.
I think they accused Sarah Palin of alerting somebody in the media that she was going to Walmart.
When she was running for BP is uh is is when that happened.
So anyway, uh Durbin says the jobs bill stalled in the Senate, not going anywhere unless there are Republican votes for it, and there aren't going to be any Republican votes for it.
There are never intended to be any votes on this.
This is not intended to pass.
It'd be a real panic if it did.
Um, because that's not its intent.
It's it's supposed to sit there and Durban's playing it right.
Yeah, we can't get any Republican support for this.
Uh, can't get any bipartisanship on this.
Republicans once again just seeking non refusing to cooperate.
Uh poor president trying to bring us out of recession, trying to working hard here.
While we've all gone soft.
You heard him say that.
Country's gone soft.
The United States, in the last two decades, by the way, we've gone soft.
That includes Clinton.
That's not just the lost decade of George W. Bush.
When Clinton is included in this, then there are fireworks about the there's stuff going on behind the scenes here that you and I don't know about because this is not haphazardly tossed out.
We've gone soft the last two decades.
Now that brings Clinton into the mess.
That brings Clinton into the equation of what's wrong with a country.
And of course, who better to toughen us up than Barack Hussein Obama?
You remember uh, ladies and gentlemen, I can't tell you a number of times, it has become a major discussion topic for callers when banks have raised the ATM fee.
People go nuts.
They emailed me and called and talked about what a bunch of rotten creeps the banks were, why there have to be a fee on the ATM anyway.
I'm already paying this bank out to Wazoo.
Well, sit tight because your bank is going to jack up your debit card fee.
Bank of America customers with basic checking accounts are going to be hit with a $5 monthly fee in order to use a debit card for purchases.
The bank announced this yesterday.
Banks and card companies have been aggressively establishing and raising fees in recent weeks as banks plan for new rules taking effect Saturday that limit the amount they can charge retailers for debit card purchases and credit card purchases.
For example, there's a uh the fee is being cut in half.
This is so this is this is uh Dodd Frank, and this is the Financial Regulatory Reform Act, the bill, and this is where all these so-called consumer protections are.
This is classic.
This is exactly what the Democrats do.
This is another one of those instances where the Commerce Committee in the Senate takes on cable TV rates.
They're way too high.
We're gonna have legislation, we're gonna make sure those cable rates come down, and all they do is go up.
So in a consumer protection bill, Dodd Frank, there is a directive that the fee banks charge institutions for using their credit cards be cut in half.
I think it's 48 cents down to 24 cents per transaction.
So the banks, okay.
Well, we gotta obey that law.
So what they're doing is making it up somewhere else.
The Democrats never factor the dynamism into anything they do.
They look at everything as static and they say to the we're gonna we're gonna really punish these banks.
These banks have been ripping off our voters, these banks have been ripping off our customers, we're gonna cut that transaction fee in half.
We're gonna make sure these banks only get half of what they and they don't, after all these years, they have to know the banks are gonna find a backdoor way to get that money back and then some.
So while the transaction fee has been cut in half by law, here comes a $5 charge, brand new $5 fee, monthly fee to use the debit card.
This is not this is above and beyond whatever your ATM fee is.
This is now a $5 monthly fee just to have and use a debit card.
Brand new fee.
Because you see, there's nothing in Dodd Frank prohibiting it.
Nothing whatsoever.
They just fail to calculate the dynamism here.
They think that all of these institutions they target for punishment are gonna sit there and take it.
It never happens.
Every time the Democrats set out as a party to help the little guy, it's the little guy that ends up getting shafted.
So just you're at Bank of America, you're about to see a $5 monthly charge, if you can even find it on the bill, but it's going to be there.
All because Chris Dodd and Barney Frank decided to have a consumer protections bill, and Obama was out there touting it too.
JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo are testing $3 fees for debit cards in select areas.
What do you mean testing?
Well, they're going to find out it doesn't work.
Citibank recently announced it's raising fees for checking accounts.
Jamie Montgomery Scott analyst Thomas McCron said last week that Visa and MasterCard, the top two debit card companies, may increase drastically the increase fees on small purchases to offset the losses.
So you know what your money, you you might end up going back to using checks by the time these banks get through, finding ways around this new law that goes into effect.
Once again, thanks to the Democrats, all this is owed to Frank and Dodd, so and Obama, so-called consumer protections.
Your debit card fees are going up, your checking account fees, your ATM fees are going, you probably are not checking account, that's untouched.
You might end up going back now to writing as many checks as you used to write.
And don't be surprised if they start at some point adding fees for electronic payment of bills.
Yeah, my friends, uh, the economics of offering a debit card have changed with recent regulations, it says here.
This is Anne Pace, spokeswoman for Bank of America.
Yeah, the economics of offering a debit card have changed with recent regulations.
We've decided to introduce a monthly fee for customers who use their debit cards for purchases.
Fees will be assessed starting in January.
Clients with premium accounts will not be affected.
Customers who use their debit cards solely to receive cash at ATMs will not be charged because they're gonna get it on the other end with the ATM fee, which will probably be raised as uh, well, so this is it's it could add up to an additional $60 a year.
All in that is gonna cost you $60 in new fees, as the banks recoup what Dodd and Frank told them they have to do without.
Quick timeout back after this.
Don't go away.
You know the PS to all this financial news is that it's actually the so-called Durban amendment, which was a last minute addition to the Dodd-Frank bill, that's really causing all this.
The Dodd-Frank bill was bad at loan, bad enough as a standalone.
I mean, it was a it was a disaster.
And then Durban added an amendment, a last-minute addition to the Dodd-Frank bill.
They're calling it the Durban Amendment, and that's where the details of reloc reside, which is causing the banks to make all these changes.
Durbin wanted these extra fees to help provide fraud detection.
I kid you not.
That was his purpose for putting in these extra fees.
They were his idea.
And the money raised was supposed to go to fraud protection.
What we need is fraud protection from Congress.
We need fraud protection from the likes of Durban and Dodd and Frank.
I would pay $5 a month for that.
I would pay $500 a month for fraud protection against Congress, from Congress.
Keep these guys out of my business and out of my life.
I'd pay $500 a month for that.
I bet a lot of you would too.
We don't need fraud protection from Congress.
We've got life lock for fraud protection.
And doesn't cost anywhere near what the Durban Amendment is going to cost people.
From CNN Money.com, three years after a financial crisis pushed the country deep into recession.
An overwhelming number of Americans, 90%, say that economic conditions remain poor.
When's the last time you ever saw a poll where 90% of anybody agreed on something?
Now the poll has some curious data.
Asked which administration is to blame for this, 52% of the 90% blame Bush.
I'm sorry.
Only 32% blame Obama the Democrats.
I do not believe that.
If that were true, Obama wouldn't be landslidable right now.
He wouldn't be in any trouble at all if that were true.
Open line Friday, Rush Limbaugh having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Open line Friday is the equivalent of a high wire act without a net.
And there have been some bombs.
There have been some bombs, and very rare, very rare.
When they happen, well, we deal with it as best we can.
It's always snerdily's fault when that happens.
But uh to his credit, it really hasn't happened much, but since it has happened once, then it's always.
Was it that long ago that the bomb was?
Really?
Was it that long ago?
Ten months ago, eleven months ago?
It just seems like two or three months ago.
Well, no, it doesn't seem like the bomb was yesterday, but it does seem like it was not almost a year ago.
Open line Friday, it's also a chance for me to phone it in.
I never do.
But but I can phone it in open line.
I want to go back seriously to this CNN poll.
It's a it's a CNN ORC International poll.
90% of the uh poll uh the 90% of the sample here says that 90% 90% say the economic conditions remain poor.
And 52% blame Bush, 32% blame Obama.
I just I'm sorry, doesn't make any sense.
Obama should be in no trouble.
In fact, Obama should have a lot of sympathy.
There's uh what was it?
Dick Morris is out recently, I think it was on Hannity or somebody on Fox, some show on Fox.
He fully expects Obama not to run.
He fully expects Obama to pull out of this.
I don't.
I I don't see that, but I've I think Obama's got grand designs.
He's only, by his own admission, 70% of the way to where he wants to be.
Uh I think he's very frustrated, but I don't think he has any desire to step aside.
Now it may well be the Democrats have a desire for him to step aside, because he is taking their party down the tubes, and there's no question about it as we sit here today.
There's just no way in a night in a poll where 90% of the people agree the economy stinks, that over half of them blame Bush.
None of the rest of what's going on makes any Obama's approval numbers in the high 30s and low forties don't make any sense.
If uh if this is right, asked which administration is to blame.
52% of Americans blame Bush.
32% point a finger at Obama and the Democrats.
And then while there is widespread consensus, the economy's in rough shape, Americans have a split opinion of two of the biggest actors, Ben Bernanke and Warren Buffett.
And they really well, yes, I think partly, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Uh, you're right.
This 52% of Americans blaming Bush.
What percentage of that bunch doesn't want to tell a pollster that they blame the black guy?
Now that's uh that's a there's no question that that's a factor, isn't it?
Here's Obama.
U.S. has become a little soft.
This was In an interview with a television station in Orlando.
Said his administration has been tough on the country's trading partners, tried to strengthen U.S. manufacturing is a great, great country.
Gotten a little soft.
We didn't have that same competitive edge we needed over the last couple of decades.
We need to get back on track.
The last couple of decades.
You know, this is not going to sit well with the American people.
To tell them that the country has gone a little soft.
Obama is who is soft, leading from behind, blaming everybody else for problems that he creates, arguing with straw men, hiding behind Warren Buffett's secretary.
Parties, vacations, golf in the face of wars and human suffering here at home.
Pretending speeches solve problems.
Tell the soldiers they gone soft, tell the first responders they've gone soft.
Tell people out of work looking for jobs they've gone soft.
You know this peep this this poll, the CNN poll, 90% of the American people think the economy stinks.
Ask them.
They blame America for being too soft.
Is that why they can't find work?
Is because they agree with Obama.
The uh the U.S. has become a little soft.
To the extent that this country is soft, where is it soft?
On the left, exactly right.
Where are the pansies in our culture?
Totally on the left.
Who is the chickification crew?
I mean, who's chickenified the news?
Who's chickenified men?
Who's chickenified politics?
It's the left.
Not to say the chicken equals going soft.
I don't think anybody would ever call Hillary soft.
Don't misunderstand.
But the wimpification of men is uh is going soft.
There's a piece at the Canada Free Press, Judy McLeod.
Warning the threat of suspended elections is real.
A dangerous new chapter is being written in American history that, if successful, is destined to impact the history of the West.
It's called Reelection by Suspended Election Revolution.
With absolutely no proof of any kind of who he really is, Barack Obama made it to the Oval Office in 2008.
There was no media vetting of the largely absentee senator from Illinois who even back then had the temerity to compare himself to Abraham Lincoln.
All anyone ever had to go on was an autobiographical book, now suspected of being ghost written.
We all know how it goes with politicians and autobiographical books.
When Nancy Pelosi writes hers, she'll claim that she Trump's mother Teresa, the Calcutta Saint, not the one married to John Kerry.
If Harry Reed ever gets around to it, writing his wine will turn to vinegar overnight.
You can claim to be anyone you want to be in a book, and that's what Barry Satoro did.
This is Judy McCloud again, the Canada Free Press.
The point is that Barry Sotoro took the name Barack Hussein Obama, got himself elected, immediately began pushing the country that so many look up to, right up to the precipice, and nobody, nobody's been able to stop him.
Now, when we have a narcissistic Obama plunging in the polls, a Democrat governor in North Carolina is pushing the envelope for suspending elections and covering up a notion that she dropped a bombshell by claiming she was only using hyperbole to make a point for a rotary club.
If the election were held tomorrow, Obama would go down in a land slide, strikingly more humiliating than the shellacking he and his party got and never got over in the midterms.
I'm gonna change up the soundbite order since now this is the second person to say Obama will go down in a landslide.
Let me find this it's it's uh looking for Charles Crauthammer, grab audio soundbite 13, sorry, 11.
No.
Number 12 first.
June 7th of this year, on this program, your host, I. The question that I'd like to ask to all of you liberals, and I know you're out there.
You know you're here.
I know you're here.
You're here every day.
On what basis does Obama deserve re-election?
On what basis has Obama earned your vote?
On what basis of all the things that this regime has done, what is it that you want more of?
What is it that's making everybody so ecstatically happy or supremely content that you want more of it?
You know, the popular election slogan, re-election slogan, four more years of this.
What do we want four more years of?
I can't think of a single thing that we want four more years of from this administration.
There's nothing that would recommend this guy is land slightable defeatable.
June 7th of this year.
I think Cookie found that was probably my first such utterance.
June 7th.
It seems like I said that earlier, but I will go with it.
June 7th, I L. Rushbo.
This guy's land slidable.
Last night on the uh special report with Brett Bear, the all-star panel at Fox News.
Brett Bear talking to Charles Krauthammer.
For Democrats in polls, not only our poll, but Gallup.
The excitement about the 2012 race, the disparity between Democrats and Republicans is significant, Charles.
That has to be concerning for the White House.
I think even worse for Obama than the decline in the intensity of support among Democrats.
Because after all, where are they going to go?
They're gonna on election day, they'll be out there for him is the number on independence.
The number of independence is staggeringly bad.
31% approval of independence.
Obama won the election in 2008 on the basis of independence.
And the first hint of trouble came in the off-year elections at the end of 2009 in Virginia and New Jersey, where independence in states that had gone, Obama went two to one against Obama.
And I think if Obama cannot rise from the 31% approval he has among independents, he's gonna suffer a landslide.
Who?
And everybody in the DC media crowd says land slightable.
Well, we here are on the cutting edge.
And we told you back in June he was landslideable.
And now uh Judy McLeod, Canada Free Press, Obama would go down in a landslide if the election were held tomorrow.
So this is now becoming common.
This hit this is becoming almost conventional wisdom.
However, the 2012 election is not tomorrow.
It's more than a year away.
The man who made it all the way to the most powerful office on earth without any identity documents, has all the money, the absolute power it brings at his command.
This is Obama's well-stocked position at a time when only suspended elections would guarantee his re-election.
So North Carolina Governor Bev Purdue was not joking when she spoke about suspending elections, nor did she pick the idea out of thin air.
Purdue was giving the suspend congressional elections idea its first oxygen for her hell bent for leather boss.
Remember now, nothing is impossible when all the control is held by a tyrant.
This is in a Canadian publication.
Obama and his masters already pulled the biggest scam on any country in modern times by making it to the White House without legitimate ID.
A dangerous new chapter is being written in American history that, if successful, is destined to impact the history of the West.
It's called re-election by suspended election revolution.
This babe, Judy McLeod, Canada Free Press actually thinks this is a strategy.
That it is a stratagem, that it is a gambit that is being hatched in the darkest corners of the Oval Office in the White House.
I find it fascinating.
Fascinating.
This is what happens, folks.
This is this is exactly the kind of thing that happens When you get tyrants and authoritarians in office, this she said it.
You know, the thing the thing that we we can't forget here, Bev Purdue said it.
Now, you might think she's a dork.
You might think she's an idiot, and she may well be.
I I don't I have the slightest idea.
I don't know anything about her, other than she's the governor of North Carolina, and I I know some people who live there what they think of her.
But she said it.
And then she tried to cover it, oh, it's just joking.
And then it was sarcasm, it was hyperbole.
She said it.
And she gave reasons for it.
A Democrat said it.
Look at these people, in a way, are like Mahmoud Ahmedine Zad.
They are going to tell us what they're going to do.
They do tell us what they would like to do.
It's up to us to deal with it.
It's up to us to believe it or cast it aside because that's kooky.
It can't possibly be true.
Yes, it can.
You don't think these people would suspend elections if they could get away with it?
Elections are going to lose.
Gotta go.
We'll be back.
I'm gonna get to your phone calls when we come back.
It's open line Friday.
Always try.
Start with phone calls in the first hour of the program and are gonna do it when we get back.
I knew.
I knew I had said Obama was landslidable before June.
We did a search of the archives at RushlinBoard.com.
Where, by the way, we have revived and and not revived, we've redesigned, they've upgraded the website.
And no longer, folks, do you have to wait until 5.30 or 6 p.m. every day for the whole site to update.
Now it updates as we go, as we transcribe monologues, other segments of the program, they're posted immediately.
The website uh updates much faster now.
Is uh much more current in real time in relationship to the program.
And we uh we're continually making progress on our search engine.
Uh it's tough to create a search engine that can find everything I've said.
Uh it's just it's just it's difficult.
It's so diverse and massive, intricate, complicated.
Uh, even though I make the complex understandable.
Uh nevertheless, we're continuing to make inroads here in our search engine.
So I did a search, we found out that I first said Obama was landslidable April 25th.
Not June the 7th.
I knew it was earlier than that.
All right, we're starting in Topeka, Kansas, with Kip.
You're up first on open line Friday.
Great to have you here.
Thanks, Rush.
Good to talk to you.
Kiddos from Kansas.
Thank you, sir.
Here's my question.
I, or here's my comment.
I'm a physician, and I've been uh I've been very concerned.
I know you think that the uh Obamacare will be repealed, and first that he won't even be re-elected.
I also know you think it'll be unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, especially with the recent decision by the district court.
But here's my concern.
As we wait for all these things to happen, the federal government is slowly implementing step by step Obamacare.
I mean, we've already, we're already, we're already feeling the effects as physicians.
We're already feeling Medicare cuts.
We're already feeling, you know, the states have already received their money from many of them from the state exchange.
I know.
Patient premiums are already going up.
People are already losing their coverage.
Employees are afraid to hire because they know they're gonna have to pay for this expensive premium for their employees, so the economy stays stagnant.
Doctors are leaving their practices and drugs, and so I I'm very concerned that as we sit and wait for all these things to happen, it's gonna be too little too late because it'll already be implemented.
No, it's never it the I'll tell you where where you're going to be right as if uh Obama wins.
And you know, we ought to talk a little bit.
Look at their strategy is exactly as you lay it out.
Slow implementation, get the roots of this thing, the entitlement aspects get them planted, making it really, really tough to uproot them.
I mean, there there is a strategy here, and and and you're right, but it's not too late yet.
And we really need to talk about the the regime's strategy in taking this to the Supreme Court, because it's multifaceted what they could be trying to secure here by going to the Supreme Court and asking for an early review of this.
I'm glad you called.
I gotta take a brief time out here.
Back in just a second, folks.
Don't go away.
I forgot where I saw this, but there's some guy, it was a blogger, it might have been National Review Online, something like that.
Some guy suggests that Obama wouldn't mind losing at the Supreme Court.
Have the thing declared unconstitutional.
You get an albatross around his neck removed for his re-election.
And of course, he wouldn't mind winning.
Having it declared constitutional.
It's kind of all over the ballpark, but uh they are trying to speed this up.
The regime does want an early ruling on uh Obama's health care bill for whatever reason.
▲
Export Selection