All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 12, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:58
September 12, 2011, Monday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this show documented to be almost always right, 99.6% at a time.
I, of course, am the host, the one and only the all-knowing, all caring, all sensing, all feeling, all concerned, even with an ingrown toenail, Maharushi.
Well, I do, and it's painful.
It's ticking me off here.
But of course, it's balanced by the fact that I am one of the few Americans who did know then what I know now.
Well, I have known for how I don't know how long that liberalism does what it does.
I've known that socialism does what it does.
I've known who liberals are and what will happen when they're in power.
You have too.
You just may not want to admit it.
Now my knowledge and what I knew then is the same as what I know now goes far beyond politics as well.
You know, people have said, gosh, would I love to go back to high school knowing then what I know now?
I do.
Indeed.
Oh, yeah.
So one of the reasons why I've become the uh overwhelming profound success that I have become.
At any rate, as I mentioned, the telephone number, by the way, 800 282-2882, if you want to be on the program.
Uh, Democrats fret aloud over Obama's chances.
That that's I'll tell you what, this speech Thursday night's what did it to him at the New York Times.
That was clown 101.
That was Barnum and Bailey.
You have a joint session of Congress.
Pass this bill now, and there's no bill.
And you give a campaign speech as a joint session, and you have up there a dreaded corporate CEO, Jeffrey ML.
Now, maybe cool that there's some crony capitalism going on between Obama and GE, but still, the left hates corporations except for their own.
Like they love the New York Times Corporation.
Yeah, and by the way, Forbes GE cuts offshore wind power plants.
I mean, this whole green energy thing is being exposed for what it's always been, a gigantic fraud.
General Electric, the U.S.-based industrial giant, leading manufacturer of wind power turbines, scaling back efforts to expand its presence in the offshore wind power market.
The rationale, there's no meaningful offshore wind market to speak of.
There's no business there.
This is Forbes.
I didn't say that.
I'm reading it.
Cylindra, there's no business there.
There is not when I say there's no, I don't mean people have no business doing that.
There is not an active business in solar panels.
It just isn't there.
There's not a business in wind power.
I mean, you might see windmills out there.
And the windmills might be turning, and the turbines might be making noise, and birds might be dying, but there's no business there.
Otherwise, corporate chieftains like Jeffrey MLDGE wouldn't be shutting them down.
There is no meaningful offshore wind market to speak of, at least not yet.
General Electric is considering laying off about 40 employees in Norway as it scales back its offshore operations there.
Now the New York Times, they see what's happening with Cylindra.
They see this clown speech on Thursday night.
And they assign three writers to a message sending story.
Democrats fret aloud over Obama's chances.
This story is a wake-up call.
This is the New York Times calling for Obama to take the gloves off.
They want him to go gangster.
They want him to go gunyon.
That's a combination, snertly, of Gogoon and Union.
Go gunion in his tactics, calling one's opponents The enemy, hostage takers.
That's not enough.
They need to go farther.
All their talk about civility is only an effort to get Republicans to shut up.
They want Obama to be even more uncivil.
My favorite line from the article is this.
Polling suggests that the president's year-long effort to reclaim the political center has so far yielded little in the way of additional support from the moderates and independents who tend to decide presidential elections.
What year-long effort to reclaim the political center would that be.
Name one significant thing Obama has done to move to the center.
They're probably thinking going along with extending the Bush tax rates was a move to the center.
So here the Republicans.
Honestly now, folks, the Republicans throughout the political spectrum are being told they need to be more moderate.
Even Republicans are telling people to be more moderate.
We've got Republican think tank artists telling me to be more moderate.
And to start learning the art of compromise.
Here's the New York Times telling Obama to go gunyan.
The New York Times telling Obama to go gangsta.
At times says that the problem is Obama's accomplishments are not being conveyed loudly enough to ordinary people.
Obama's accomplishments are not being conveyed loudly enough to ordinary people.
The trouble is the vast majority of Americans strongly oppose his accomplishments because they have resulted in the loss of their jobs and their homes.
I'm sorry for yelling, but I'm I'm amazed by this story.
Let me just get right to it.
Democrats are expressing growing alarm about President Obama's reelection prospects and in interviews, are openly acknowledging anxiety about the White House's ability to strengthen the president's standing over the next 14 months.
The New York Times agrees with El Rushbo.
Who is it that's been telling you he's in trouble?
Who is it?
Not bragging, reminding, who is it that has been telling you that the internal numbers in the White House are devastating?
Their own polls, meaning the honest ones, not the ones that Chuck Todd says our pollsters are concerned about.
Elected officials and party leaders at all levels said their worries have intensified as the economy has displayed new signs of weakness.
They said the likelihood of a highly competitive 2012 race is increasing as the Republican field, once dismissed by many Democrats as too inexperienced and conservative to pose serious threat, has started narrowing to two leading candidates, Mitt Romney and Rick Perry, who have executive experience and messages built around job creation.
Oh, now all of a sudden there is legitimacy in the Republican side.
Elected officials and party leaders at all levels now see legitimacy in the candidacies of Romney and Perry.
And that's a little backhanded slap, but still.
you know, I'm not going to be able to do it.
So now they're knowing.
Now they're starting to realize that this isn't an admission in the New York Times that Obama wasn't qualified.
And that these two Republicans are.
The Times is admitting Obama wasn't qualified and that he has not learned on the job because genuine executives and job creators pose his threat, greatest threat.
These are gut punches to Obama.
I mean, I read this, and the first question, why are they doing this?
So I said, why are they writing this now?
They're guaranteeing this is going to be seen.
Sunday, September 11th, everybody's reading newspapers.
They are guaranteeing this is going to be seen.
Why are they doing this?
They're sending a men.
They are worried.
They know now they're dealing with somebody unqualified and inexperienced, and in contrast with two people who are, who are generally genuinely associated with job creation, and experienced executives.
Obama is looking bad.
And in a campaign cycle in which Democrats had entertained hopes of reversing losses from last year's midterm election.
Some in the party fear that Mr. Obama's troubles could reverberate down the ballot into congressional state and local races, as they did last November.
Peter DeFasio, Democrat, Oregon, in my district, the enthusiasm for Obama has mostly evaporated.
There is tremendous discontent with his direction.
So now we got Democrats speaking by name on the record.
Let me translate Peter DeFasio here.
He says, in my district, the enthusiasm for Obama has mostly evaporated.
There is tremendous discontent with his direction.
You know what the translation is?
Paging Hillary, attention, paging Hillary, Hillary Clinton, is what that means.
Thank you.
The president's economic address last week offered a measure of solace to discourage Democrats by employing an assertive and scrappy style that many supporters complain has been absent for the last year as he has struggled to rise above Washington gridlock.
Several Democrats suggested that he watch a tape of his own job speech over and over and use it as a guide until the election.
What kind of idiot do they take Obama for?
Tell him to watch the speech over and over?
He's that inexperienced, and he's got to watch his own speech over and over.
What in the world, what has happened out there to make the New York Times of Democrats think that next year's election number is going to be any better than last year's?
What's better in the country since the November 2010 elections?
What's better?
Nothing's better, nothing's improved.
We've had to have a new jobs bill, a new stimulus.
Everything is worse from where I sit.
So what makes them think that November forten is even better results?
But that's what they say.
But a survey in two dozen Democrat officials of two dozen Democrat officials found a palpable sense of concern that transcended a single week of ups and downs.
The conversations signaled a change in mood from only a few months ago when Democrats widely believed that Obama's path to re-election while challenging was secure.
Now this confirms what we already know, that the Democrats live in an echo chamber and they're tone deaf.
They actually, up until what, a few months ago, thought everything was hunky-dory?
I don't believe that for a second.
I think they've known.
Since the November elections.
Give it six months after the election.
I think since the Tea Party bubbled up, they have known they're in trouble.
Why very soon?
Because it is working.
Obama is and isn't working.
There is no utopia out there.
There is no new kitchen, no new car.
The people making out like bandits are Wall Street and CEOs, the kind of people that Obama's voters think Obama hates like they do.
Obama's in bed with them.
The frustrations are real, said Representative Elijah Cummings of Maryland.
He's in the Congressional Black Caucus, by the way.
He was the state chairman of Obama's campaign four years ago in Maryland.
I think we know that there is a Barack Obama that's deep in there, and he's got to synchronize it with passion and principles.
Thank you.
So here's Elijah Cummings, good friends with Maxine Waters, who says, I think we know that there is a Barack Obama that's deep in there.
Deep in what?
Deep in doo-doo?
Deep in doo-doo?
And you've got to find a way to extract Obama from the deep in doo-doo?
Or what is Obama deep in?
Deep in doo-doo?
These are on the record quotes, folks.
This is unbelievable.
We heard complaints last week the Republicans weren't giving the president the proper respect by not attending his speech and by not offering a response.
It's clearly the Democrats that don't respect this guy, and they've lost all confidence.
At least the ones that are speaking on record here to the New York Times.
Get this, it gets better as I go on.
There is little cause for immediate optimism with polls showing Mr. Obama at one of the lowest points of his presidency.
Remember now this is even after the heralded clownish speech last Thursday night.
This speech was heralded.
He's back.
Howard Feynman exceeded my expectations.
This is three days after that great appearance.
His own economic advisors have quit.
The Times doesn't say that I did.
I threw it in.
This properly written should say Obama's remaining economic advisors concede that the unemployment rate, currently 9.1%, is unlikely to drop substantially over the next year, creating a daunting obstacle to re-election.
What?
Wait a minute, folks.
Now I thought the economy was saved.
Thanks to Obama's latest spending spree.
I thought Thursday night's job act saved everything.
Another half a trillion dollars.
And you mean for another half a trillion dollars the unemployment rate's not going to move?
For another half trillion dollars, we're going to stay at 9.1%?
This is what the New York Times is telling us.
And the Republicans are supposed to pass this.
Liberals have grown frustrated by some of Obama's actions, like the decision this month to drop tougher air quality standards.
And polling suggests that the president's year-long effort to reclaim the political center has so far yielded little in the way of additional support from the moderates and independents who tend to decide presidential election.
Again, that's my favorite part of this.
Reclaim the political center.
By being the um most petulant, childish, angry, divisive president in history?
By running the economy into the ground, by blowing up the deficit with insane spending, by not producing budgets?
By lying about headwinds and bumps in the road, and we've turned a corner.
By claiming that ATMs and earthquakes halfway across the world are responsible for the economy.
By the way, if earthquakes are the problem, they're over.
Why hasn't the economy recovered?
So Obama's excuses are tired.
Nobody believes a word he says.
New York Times is worried, and I'm still not through.
Baba do Badu.
I taking a brief time off from the New York Times story for some folks, I was uh really wrong here, but San Francisco Chronicle.
Um there may be a business there.
Solar City gets one billion dollar federal housing contract.
The federal government on Wednesday, this is from September 8th this last week.
The federal government on Wednesday tapped San Mateo's solar city for the largest residential solar project in history, a one billion dollar effort to install panels and a hundred and twenty-four U.S. military bases during the next five years.
Solar City will place solar systems on as many as a hundred and sixty thousand military housing buildings, base warehouses, and administrative buildings.
The first installations at Hickam.
Air Force Base in Hawaii are already underway.
The scale of this absolutely massive, said Lyndon Rive, SolarCity's CEO.
It's equal to all our solar the country's installed in the last 30 years.
Well, I would think...
My gosh, I got a little tea business.
Imagine what would happen if I could get a billion dollar grant.
Think about that.
Then I wouldn't have to be worried about shipping costs.
I wouldn't have to worry about revving up on big promotion days, buying a bunch of extra servers and so forth to handle the load.
I could just go out.
I wouldn't have to worry about business things at all.
Wouldn't have to worry about Cylindra because the government shut them down.
I'd have to know I'm next, by the way.
If all goes as planned, the solar strong.
You know, the cylinder guys have to be asking, what the hell do we do wrong here?
You gave us 523 million bucks, and now our CEO's house are being raided.
You invite us in the meetings.
You, Obama, come out, you tout us as the future.
Now you've shut us down, you give this clown here a billion dollars to start housing.
We what military?
You actually want to help the military.
I thought we were cutting the military budget.
No, no, we're gonna use a little experimentation.
The military, as America's largest consumer of energy, has set a goal of getting 25% of its energy from renewable sources by 2025.
So they're actually forcing the military to do this.
That's what this is.
But there is a business there.
Billion dollars, federal housing contract, solar panels, military base.
It's easy.
you Okay, uh, back to the phones here in just a second.
I want to finish with this New York Times piece because uh it's now you know what?
I better take some calls because we've got three more pages of this.
It is a long piece.
It's filled with pithy uh unique comments from me.
Plus the overall translation of translation of why the thing has been written and published.
And the the the bottom line is that they are scared to death.
They know full well Obama can lose and lose big.
And what they know, folks, what they know is that it is their ideology that's on the line.
They know that liberalism finally is being understood in a in a in a mass way.
It's not just Democrats versus Republicans.
This is ideology.
The New York Times, they are fearful that people are waking up to the ideological failure that is liberalism, the ideological understanding of it, and therefore it must not lose.
And whatever it takes to win, they are urging Obama to do, and they will support.
It doesn't matter.
Liberalism must prevail even if Obama doesn't.
It's no longer about it.
That's really what this story is.
They are telling him that that pal, it's no longer about you.
It's about who we are on the left.
And our triumphing and winning.
And if you don't do what's necessary here to win, we will.
They're admitting that he is land slightable.
But to the phones, Chet in Pittsburgh, great to have you, sir.
Thank you very much for waiting.
I appreciate your patience.
Hi.
My pleasure from a previous Democrat who've been a longtime listener, and hopefully my whole family knows that I've called because we're all very proud of you.
It's it's interesting that you stopped uh your your uh previous section with a the New York Times article, and I want to circle back to the Kruckman article.
Uh the game being a stinker yesterday.
I had a little bit of time to tool around the internet, and what you didn't get to in that Krugman piece about the hijackers of 9-11, i.e.
the uh Kerricks and the uh and George Bush and their response and Julian's responses, at the very end, he states, of course, he's not going to permit any coasts uh any uh any posts on his blog, quote, for obvious reasons.
Well, the obvious reasons are exactly what you're talking about.
The liberals think they know more than us.
They think that the First Amendment should only apply to their views, not opposing views.
And here we are.
He is uh espousing these very hateful things, but nobody else could have an intelligent contrary response to him.
That's liberalism at a type.
Yeah, it's true.
It's very true.
Krugman did uh say at the end of his piece in the New York Times on the on the web version that he was suspending comments.
He was not gonna because he knew what he was gonna get.
He knows that he is thinking is uh so small you can put him, everybody else that believes what he believes in a thimble.
Maybe a phone booth.
But it's not a First Amendment issue, I don't think with he he just doesn't want to deal with it.
He just doesn't want to see it.
He doesn't want to see the disagreement, he doesn't want to deal with it.
He doesn't want to hear any back sass.
Um pure and simple.
He did everybody a favor.
Because who wanted to read it anyway?
I we we we need more honesty from the left like that.
He told us frankly what he really thinks of 9-11 and the effort to keep the country safe.
He also told us as a liberal, he doesn't care what you think.
He doesn't want to read what you think, and it doesn't matter to it.
For all of you people paying to read the New York Times on the web, keep that in mind.
Don't care what you think.
Neil, Matthews, North Carolina, hello, sir.
You're next to the EIB network.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, thanks for taking my call.
You bet, sir.
Hey, listen, you want to rob those record-breaking numbers in the NFL.
I'll tell you why.
It's not because people are looking to escape, it's because people are looking, they're trying to search for something that this country was founded on, and that is pure competition without somebody intervening every time somebody gets ahead of somebody else.
That's okay.
I can go for that.
Strength.
Traditional American values.
That's what they're seeing.
But it is an escape.
Don't for a moment think that it's not an escape from things.
Sports always is that, even in good times, it's an escape from everybody's humdrum because everybody does have humdrum.
But I think you're you're you're absolutely right.
Just old-fashioned, unfettered competition drama.
Nobody knows what the outcome's gonna be.
There will be efforts to cheat.
Some will succeed, some will fail.
The reps won't catch everything.
It's all there.
Well, if you if if you would uh take an example of your Pittsburgh Steelers, and I hate to say this, but uh at halftime, if the if Obama would have been the uh commissioner, he would have changed the rules so Pittsburgh could have come back and you know scored some more.
Well, I don't know what he would have changed, he might have penalized Baltimore somehow.
Um that is uh well it's not the regime's team.
The regime's team is the Chicago Bears.
The reg the regime Dan Rooney raised a lot of money and campaigned for Obama and they gave him a jersey.
I got so sick when I saw that, but they gave him a jersey.
Uh uh nevertheless, uh uh the the uh point is well taken.
Look, folks, you you might say, Rush, are you serious?
You have to attach politics to everything.
I'm not attacking politics.
Um this is culture, folks.
This is culture.
I mean, I could I can we've got the National Football League, we've had the opener on Thursday.
We had a near record viewer for Thursday night opener.
We had a 15-year record last night for Sunday night football.
And I got people writing me, I don't care, nobody cares about football, stick to the issues.
And the whole country is watching this stuff.
Yes, I saw uh snurtly, I watched portions of every game.
What did I think of Philadelphia?
Well, uh it's hard to know yet.
They're playing the lambs, and the Lambs lost their three key players.
Uh well, the receiver, M. Andola, for a year they don't know, but Bradford may not be able to pick up football for a while.
Uh Steven Jackson can't uh I Philadelphia's gonna be a good team.
There's no question they're gonna have a they're gonna be gonna have a good season.
But well, you you know the game of the day was I'm gonna shock everybody.
The game of the day was the Carolina Panthers and the Arizona Cardinals.
That was the game of the that was the nail biter game of the day.
If you throw out Thursday night's finish.
But on Sunday, the Carolina Arizona game.
I mean, and here's this rookie Cam Newton that everybody throws over 400 yards and and and uh did not look like a rookie at all.
If you have a chance, if you have NFL rewind, or if you if you have a you you have a chance on the uh the I think I'm sure that the NFL network will replay that game during the week.
If you have a chance, you should watch that one.
You all right, ask it.
What's totally unrelated question?
Oh.
How can you be he's wanting to know how you can be uh Tebow question?
How can you be so great in college and uh and and have problems in the NFL?
Totally different game.
I mean Collie his his his offense in college was uh Tebow left, Tower right, Tow up the middle, and maybe if you have to throw it, you know, wind up and chuck it six yards.
But the National Football League is the Air Force.
And he's got a throwing motion that takes uh way, way too the the vaunted marino quick release.
T bow just doesn't have it yet.
No hardly nobody works harder than he does, but but that's why people say, Well, you like college?
No, I mean I didn't go to college, so I don't have an alma mater, so I don't have it's a totally different game than the National Football League.
Nothing wrong with it.
I just it just doesn't uh appeal to me.
I like watching the best.
I'm not into amateur anything.
I that's why I'm not into the Olympics.
And the Olympics was never amateur because we're always against the Soviet Red Army in something.
These German women who were men.
The Olympics is always, as far as I'm concerned, been a joke.
That's why that hockey victory was so special.
That we really was a bunch of amateurs that beat the Soviet Red Army in 1980.
Anyway, I I'm just not I've never been an amateur anything.
Uh who's next?
Arlene, and that's just me, and I'm not putting it down.
Um if you love it, that's fabulous.
I know people that just went nuts over the Notre Dame, Michigan game on Saturday night.
I saw I you don't want to know what I saw.
You know, you don't care about that.
I mean just people loved it.
I don't want to burst bubbles.
Arlene in Chicago.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Great to have you here.
Hi.
Thank you, Usha.
I called about a Ponzi, the Ponzies game, which it is for Social Security, but I do disagree.
The best game was the Bears.
And I wanted to comment quickly on the No, I'm talking about you're a Bears fan.
Of course.
I'm talking about the best game to watch.
It's a solid game to what was it it I'm not people aren't gonna believe this, the Arizona Cardinals and the Carolina Panthers, but it was a good game.
If you get a chance to watch it, watch it.
Anyway, that's not what you call it.
What'd you call it?
I I did want to mention uh the uh when I heard the president say about one day of service, I thought, what?
As a young girl, I was taught we do service for our country every opportunity because especially girls, and some countries we wouldn't uh live very long.
And so therefore I I have done uh m massive uh amounts of service, and I do go to uh nursing homes uh every week, and believe me, when the Bears were on, those guys uh even though they're sick and half half awake, half a they were awake for the for the the the uh Bears game.
Yep.
And uh as far as the Ponzi uh scheme it is I'm a senior, I am living on not living, but I I do get social security because when I was a teenager, I was told my first job by a very astute uh uh uh person that I shouldn't depend I will never be able to live on social security.
I should save my money and I listened and uh if I didn't I would be up a creek without a paddle right for you that's very that's a sign that we're gonna do it.
And you know all these young people and think about it all those that were killed on uh September 11th probably put an average of twenty to thirty years or into social security and not didn't get a penny.
I've had relatives their families did because they died before they even got a first check no their families did though now let me ask you I don't have much time here but I gotta know what do women do you said girls and women do things, service their country every day, what did you mean?
PTA, Girl Scouts go and help in nursing homes and hospitals if you can, there's so many places uh be a uh a judge at election time because especially here in Chicago it is so crooked here.
Yeah okay that's I mean there's countless things you can I didn't know if you meant having babies or what uh having babies and raising them there's no question that's a factor too.
Okay, okay.
Just I wanted to know what we were talking about.
I'm looking Oscar Wilde said it and it works for me.
I have simple tastes I am only satisfied with the best try this a flash comment from a female listener about the guy calling about football dear Maha Rushi I think your caller is onto something.
I mean, just tuning into any NFL game gives a viewer a shock of recognition.
Oh, yeah, this is what American kick-ass men look like, especially those of us immersed in watching politics.
One gets so used to seeing pansy pundits and politicians, especially those on the left, that it's just totally refreshing to see every second of the NFL with actual testosterone and physicality.
That was definitely my first reaction.
Oh, yeah, this is America.
I forgot, just catching a glimpse with all of this.
all the American male obsessed sports traditions rules of the game and just so totally reassuring America's still here and then you add on top of that the NFL really did the 911 memorial pregames well.
They didn't overdo it it wasn't maudlin it was it was just the right tone.
And I tell you I was flipping around last night before the um football game and I catch uh caught uh a little bit of the pregame at uh the Mets Mets Cubs and the Mets did a great job last night with their pregame.
Some people think it went over the top I don't I thought it was beautiful.
So I I th I I can understand people with this uh point of view it was Americana on uh on parade that's why I mean I could pass for an NFL guy mad one time maybe uh Tony Edmond I still yes I've still got the New York Times thing to go here.
Look there's a lot to do.
We still got another hour sit tight.
Tony in Edmonds, Washington Great to have you on the EIB network sir.
Hello.
Ah hi Rush uh thanks.
I I uh heard your talk about this billion dollar contract of these Yehoos and and uh it's a solar city down there in uh down there in uh the Samateo.
Well it's just ludicrous.
I'm an architect and I deal with this market.
My profession has drunk the Kool-Aid on the sustainable archie to the utmost and and that's all these guys do these days is talk sustainable.
I I ran the numbers on solar collectors.
Um there's a little program here at Magnolia Seattle that is um you can buy a solar collector for a thousand bucks that'll generate a point three four kilowatt per hour.
You count that out which will run what what will that run?
That will run well a point three kilowatts it'll spin your meter back three kilowatts per hour.
Yeah, but what'll I run?
A light bulb, what'll it run?
Well, I'm not sure exactly.
I mean, a kilowatt, you know, if you take a 60-watt light bulb, it takes 60 watts, I guess, per hour to run that light bulb, is how it works.
Okay.
Well, you're an architect, you would know.
Well, so this thing is is is 0.3 kilowatts.
You count it out, and you assume, say in Seattle, you had 260 days of sunlight for eight hours a day.
And that's a very generous assumption.
Probably it's more like 180 and and maybe six hours per day.
I don't know.
But but you know, use that that number of 260 days at 10 hours of sunlight a day, and you calc it out and you get um essentially sixteen years payback to earn a thousand dollars at ten cents a kilowatt hour.
Well, look it.
We're look we're we're talking marketing terms here anyway.
There is no such thing as renewable.
There's no such thing as sustainable.
There's no such thing as clean.
In terms of energy.
Is there?
You're an architect.
Well, no, there isn't.
I mean, what what what renews?
Well, you run.
Maybe reverse osmosis with water.
But what what renews?
Well, I mean, supposedly sunlight just shines down and you collect the energy, but you gotta clean these panels.
You know how your windshield gets dirty just sitting out in the uh in the why does it take a one billion dollar grant from the government to some company to be able to harness that in the point there it doesn't work is the point.
Anyway, I gotta break.
We'll be right back.
If you get the NFL network on your cable system, I know it's on direct TV, if you get it on your cable system, NFL Network is gonna replay Carolina at Arizona Tuesday night at 9.30.
And it's a good game.
Might have been the game of the week, just in terms of pure nail-biting football.
We'll be back.
▲
Export Selection