All Episodes
Previous Next
July 12, 2011 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:23
July 12, 2011, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Okay, we're up to audio soundbite number four.
All right, got that?
Okay, cool.
I know you're saying, why didn't you tell him that during the break?
I just thought of it.
That's why.
During the break, I'm trying to find out when Apple is going to release OS 10 Lion 10.7.
All of the educated guesses say tomorrow, but there's no indication of it.
And I already have it, so I don't know why I care.
I'm still interested in it.
Anyway, greetings and welcome back, my good friends El Rushbo, America's truth detector, real anchorman, doctor of democracy, all combined into one harmless, lovable little fuzzball.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Shortly in this half hour, U.S. Senator Marco Rubio from Florida will appear on the program.
He, by the way, in addition to a great floor speech in the Senate that Boehner quoted last week, Rubio said recently that every aspect of life in America is worse since Obama took over.
And I, you know, we don't schedule a lot of guests on this program.
They ask us to appear.
We scheduled this.
We need as many Republican voices saying this kind of thing and amplified as loudly as we can make it, I think, during this bruising battle.
And also, we had a call from a nice guy from the Bronx, Richie, who wanted to take issue with some of my reporting, quote unquote, about General Electric.
I pointed out that the General Electric CEO, Imel Obama's private sector hiring commission, telling businesses just start hiring people.
Stop complaining about government.
GE has fired or laid off between 36 and 50,000 people since 2009.
They want to call, well, you're not counting on the dispensation of jobs brought about by the sale of various entities.
No, I am because it's all underneath the GE umbrella.
So here are the details on the no-tax business.
And he also said, you're saying that they broke the law.
No, I'm not saying they broke the law.
I didn't say they're cheating anybody.
I think the number is actually 3.2 billion that they didn't pay in taxes.
Just like corporate jet owners aren't cheating anybody.
Just like corporate jet owners don't need to be hit on.
At any rate, from no less than the New York Times, March 24th of this year, General Electric, the nation's largest corporation, had a very good year in 2010.
The company reported worldwide profits of $14.2 billion and said that $5.1 billion, that's where I got confused.
That's their U.S. profit.
Worldwide profits of $14.2 billion, $5.1 billion of it from the United States.
Zero taxes.
In fact, general, no, I was right.
It is 5.1.
Here's where I got confused.
GE claimed a tax benefit of $3.2 billion.
New York Times, quite understanding here, by the way.
I mean, they want desperately to understand how this is possible, said that may be hard to fathom for the millions of American business owners and households now prepping their own returns.
But low taxes are nothing new for GE.
The company has been cutting the percentage of its American profits paid to the IRS for years, resulting in a far lower rate than at most multinational companies.
Its extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore.
So, folks, it's even better than we thought.
It's even better.
Creative accounting, innovative accounting, aggressive lobbying, all those things we're heretofore told we are supposed to despise.
We're supposed to hate lobbyists, and we're supposed to love things like Sarbanes-Oxley.
We're supposed to hate Enron type accounting, right?
Here, we're supposed gimmicks.
We're supposed to stand up and give GE a standing O and put its CEO on the Private Sector Hiring Commission and then get stories in the New York Times: hey, there's nothing to see here.
Move on, nothing to see here.
I don't remember, I don't recall the last time the New York Times was unmoved by aggressive lobbying, fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting.
By the way, ladies and gentlemen, Obama has just announced, not paraphrasing this now, but he's just announced that he can't guarantee that social security checks will go out if the debt ceiling isn't raised on time.
CBS News, Obama says he cannot guarantee Social Security checks will go out on August 3rd.
Here's the quote: I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved the issue because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.
He did, it's in an interview with Scott Pelley, the new info guy, according to excerpts released by CBS News.
Folks, that's just an utter lie.
Social Security checks are not affected by the debt limit.
The debt limit, we had all the details yesterday.
The debt limit does not deal with entitlements.
Entitlements are not debts, treasury bonds, T-bills.
Those are the kinds of debt we're talking about.
Social Security isn't on the table.
If there is a default, I've read Social Security checks all the way out to the end of the year because it would take that long for the Social Security bunch to change their computers.
This is all BS.
He personally can't guarantee.
That's why I'm telling you, they're the ones feeling the heat at the White House.
The pressure is on them.
They're the ones that are in a state of disarray.
It's not the Republicans.
Okay, got to take a break.
We'll come back and we'll have Marco Rubio, United States Senator from Florida, as our guest right after this.
Don't go away.
By the way, folks, that New York Times story from March 24th of this year also points out that General Electric, hey, Richie and DeBronx, are you listening to this?
Since the 1990s, General Electric has laid off one-fifth of their American workers, since 2002.
Since 2002, General Electric has laid off one-fifth of their American workers.
And by the way, speaking of shutdowns, the Minnesota government has been shut down for two weeks.
Has life ended there?
Heck, legislators, they're still being paid.
We welcome to the EIB Network Senator Marco Rubio from Florida.
Great to have you on the program, sir, and welcome.
Well, thank you for having me.
I want to play for you.
I know you heard this, but I want to play for you, Speaker Boehner, at his press conference yesterday in Washington talking about you.
If you want to see an increase in government revenues, then let's grow the economy and create jobs, broaden the tax base, and lower rates.
As Senator Rubio said last week, we don't need more taxes.
What we need are more taxpayers.
And you are also on record as saying every aspect of life in America is worse since Obama took over.
Republican voters aren't used to hearing this from elected Republicans.
Congratulations to you.
Well, maybe I just haven't been here long enough to know better.
You know, the first part about it, Rush, is something, you know, this debt limit thing.
I said to somebody earlier today in the hallway, one of these media types that waits out in the hallways to interview you.
They want to talk about the debt limit.
I said, the debt limit is a symptom.
It's not our problem.
The core problem is our debt and the fact that our government borrows 40 cents out of every dollar and has no idea how it's going to pay it back.
And that's a combination of spending.
We just spend way too much at government and loss of revenues.
Again, and not loss of revenues because our taxes aren't high enough.
Loss of revenues because we have too many people that are out of work that are not paying taxes.
So the solution seems to me to be a combination of fiscal discipline on the spending side, which you have to enforce through spending caps and a balanced budget amendment and cuts starting right now.
And at the same time, some sort of pro-growth measures that get people back to work that create not new taxes, but new taxpayers, people that are working, paying their taxes, adding revenue to government so that government can use that revenue not to grow government, but to pay down the debt and put us on a sustainable path.
I know, I mean, that just seems to me to be the common sense approach to this.
And instead, we've got this president's obsession with raising taxes.
And what bothers me the most about it, not just that it'll kill jobs and is bad for our economy, what bothers me the most is there isn't a single tax package out there that's reasonable and realistic that would even put a dent on this debt crisis.
I mean, people have no idea what you'd have to raise the taxes in this country to just to begin to make a difference.
Of course, you never can raise it to that level because you won't be able to collect them because people aren't dumb enough to work for free.
I mean, if you're going to tax all their money, then they're not going to keep working.
So these are the things I just don't get.
And I wish we had done a better job earlier of outlying these choices to the American people.
Well, you're doing it now.
It's not too late, is it?
I hope it's not too late.
I mean, part of the game that play out here is wait till the last minute, wait till the final days or weeks, and then basically tell everybody, well, guys, it's either take it or leave it.
Either we do this or the world falls apart, the government falls apart, we default on our debt.
We've known about this for months, for years.
This is an ongoing issue.
And I think part of that is strategy.
Part of that is just a political process that hopes someone's going to come in and solve it for them.
Well, we know what the this is as old as a Democratic playbook, and a lot of us wonder why do Republicans continue to fall for it?
Why are we so afraid that something you just articulated, and I'm sure if you know it, every other Republican on Capitol Hill knows it.
Why then is it such an over-the-cliff thing if we know what they're trying to do to us?
If we know what their plan is, that we know they're going to have newspaper stories coming soon praising Republicans that disagree with Boehner and McConnell.
Why is it so hard to resist this if we know what their plan is?
Well, part of the fear, I'll tell you what it is.
I mean, part of the fear that members have up here is because they're afraid that at some point here soon, Geithner and others are going to start sending letters to Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries and troops in the field and telling them you're not going to be getting your paychecks because we can't.
Let me interrupt you.
Obama just did that.
Obama just did that.
They've just excerted his interview with CBS News, and he just said, just released last 10 minutes, that he cannot guarantee Social Security checks will go out after August 2nd if we don't raise the debt level.
Well, and again, this was by design because he knows that these checks are due to the majority of them start getting paid August 3rd, so that's why August 2nd was picked as a date.
It's as much a political ploy as anything else, and that's the leverage they're going to use.
And again, the American people are being held hostage.
But we have an advantage that I don't think existed in 1995 or in other years that people are still traumatized by for whatever reason.
I'm not sure.
But the advantage is we have multiple ways to communicate that didn't exist back then.
And also, I think thanks to programs like yours and others that are out there doing this service, people are more aware of this than they've ever been.
I mean, they now, I think, clearly understand the choices.
There's a much greater awareness in the American population about how government works and how government doesn't work and what our problems are.
So I think ultimately this problem is a big deal.
I mean, this is not some small dispute that you can cut in the middle and everybody gets something.
I mean, this is a major issue that if it's left unresolved, is going to lead to a sovereign debt crisis and ultimately the redefinition of government's role in America and America's role in the world.
This is as big as it gets, and we need to treat it that way, both in our solutions and in our approach.
Now, a lot of Americans agree with every word that you've said, and they've thought this for a long time.
And a lot of Americans just have a tough time getting their arms around the fact that they've elected a man who is leading the nation in this direction, even after two and a half years of demonstrable failure.
After we couldn't be more clear about how wrong and destructive these policies are, he wants to continue them and increase them.
And a lot of Americans can't understand why.
Who is this man?
Well, here's the problem.
He has to be measured by an objective standard that every president has to be measured by.
When I look at this election next year, what he's really going to be coming to the American people and asking for is an extension to his contract.
He wants a four-year extension to his contract to be president of the United States.
So we have to measure him.
And how do we measure him?
Well, unemployment.
Unemployment is higher than significantly higher than when he took over.
You know, what about the value of people's homes?
The value of people's homes are down.
How about the national debt?
The national debt is up significantly higher with no solution in sight and none offered by him.
By every measure that you can measure a president by, things have gotten worse and significantly worse.
And that's what he has to be measured by.
And part of it, I think, is a flawed ideology because I think his view of government and the people and his administration is a flawed view that takes us away from the things that have made America exceptional.
And part of it is, quite frankly, incompetence.
I honestly believe, and I don't say this with any disrespect.
I really don't know him, have nothing personal against him, but I honestly think there's a lack of competence in terms of being able to do the job and the inability to lead on some of these critical issues.
And the result is being paid by millions of Americans who can't find a job or are working twice as hard to make half as much, who see their country being bankrupted and no serious solutions being offered.
Yeah, well, he sees it being bankrupted, too.
This is the thing that he sees it not working.
I guess this is just the result of sitting around the faculty lounge at Harvard and talking about your theories all your life and finally getting a chance to implement them.
And I want to go back to this social security business because it's the playbook, as you said, hold the seasoned citizens in the military hostage, tell them that their payments aren't coming.
That is economic terrorism.
Tell me, can Congress prioritize the payments of the debt if we were to get to that circumstance?
Can you guarantee who gets paid, who doesn't?
Senator Pat Toomey has a bill that does that, that actually directs them to pay certain things first.
And I don't think Harry Reid, with all due respect, is going to be giving it a hearing anytime soon.
But there is a bill out there that will direct that, and I'm a co-sponsor of it, as are most of my Republican colleagues in the Senate.
And we will only go into default if Obama makes us default.
I mean, he can stop this, right?
Sure.
Not only can he stop it, he can stop it right now by basically saying, you know what, we need to do something to grow our economy.
Let's pass tax reform.
Let's pass regulatory reform.
He can stop this by also starting to implement some of the spending measures we think are necessary.
He can also stop it by basically prioritizing spending on certain things if it comes to that.
But let me tell you one thing, Russia.
No one's said yet, or maybe they have.
The fact that payments on Social Security and Medicare may stop is a stinging indictment and a wake-up call.
That means what Americans should realize, hold on a second, my Social Security check and my Medicare benefits are borrowed.
The money that you're using to pay for my Social Security are borrowed?
I thought I paid into a trust fund.
I thought I worked my whole life to pay into some system, and now you're just paying me my money back.
And you're telling me that the money's being borrowed?
I mean, that's what they're basically conceding when they're saying this.
Yeah.
You know, that's exactly right.
We always thought Social Security was in a lockbox.
Well, maybe a Chinese lockbox because that's what we're borrowing the money from.
The point is that if that comes to pass or he's threatening to do that, then the wake-up call and the message to Americans is, hey, your Social Security benefits, your Medicare benefits, what we're paying soldiers in the field, all these things that are being cut off, this is borrowed money.
This is not money we have or money we saved for you.
This is money we are borrowing from your children and your grandchildren, and we have no way of paying back.
Speaker.
And that alone should send the chill up the spine of millions of Americans.
We're speaking, by the way, United States Senator Marco Rubio from Florida.
Speaker Boehner said today that he wants to see the president's plan.
The Republicans have presented plenty of specificity.
Haven't seen any from the president.
What are your thoughts on the Republicans saying to the president, you know what?
We're going to stop this endless parade of meetings.
We're not accomplishing anything here.
You get to play the adult in a room.
You created this problem, and now you sit around and talk about fiscal responsibility and putting our house in order as though it's our fault.
We've got some suggestions.
You have no specificity.
You let us know when you're really willing to talk about it, and we'll come back.
Yeah, I mean, that's right, and that's exactly right.
I would say the president has offered a plan already.
It's the budget he offered earlier in the year that instead of reducing the debt, actually increased it dramatically and increased taxes to boot.
So it actually grew taxes and grew the debt.
And that plan that the president put forward earlier in the year, his budget, you know how many votes it got in the Senate?
Zero.
Not a single Democrat voted for his budget.
That's how outrageous and preposterous it was.
So that's the president's budget that he put forward.
So the bottom line is this president has not led on this issue.
Again, it's partial incompetence.
Part of it is just playing games with us politically.
I think they've always designed it to come to this last moment where he can hold the economy hostage and say, look what's going to happen if you don't give me my way on these things.
But the reality is the long-term implications of the direction he's headed taking our country are hard to exaggerate.
One minute remaining, where do you think it's going to end up or how?
I have no idea other than to tell you that here's what I think is the worst possible outcome.
The worst possible outcome is an increase in the debt limit without any corresponding fiscal discipline or cuts.
Because the message that's going to send to the world is America is still borrowing more than it can pay back and it has no plans to reverse course.
And if you think this debt limit problem is catastrophic, these guys go around thinking that just wait till the rating houses downgrade us because they say America has no way to pay back this debt that they're taking out.
Then you're going to have a real catastrophe on our hands.
And at that point, our options are virtually nil.
So I think that's the worst possible outcome.
We can never allow that to happen.
Senator, thanks so much for your time.
Thank you, Russia.
You bet.
Senator Marco Rubio from Florida, Hellbent for Leather.
And that is why I wanted him to come on the program today.
We need to hear this kind of thing from elected Republicans in Washington, not just from America's anchorman.
You know, they say that raising a debt limit is kicking the can down the road, but we're running out of road is the point.
I mean, shovel-ready jobs in the stimulus were supposed to build new roads.
We didn't build any new roads, and the road the can is on is filled with potholes and doesn't have a whole lot of road left on it.
We'll be right back.
More of your phone calls when we resume.
And thanks again to United States Senator Marco Rubio from Florida.
Blew the roof off inside of about 10 minutes on this program.
It's really, really powerful.
We'll have that transcribed and decoded for the media so they can take it out of context in great detail at rushlinbaugh.com as soon.
And by the way, Coco, back from vacation today.
Coco and Cookie are back.
Wanted to welcome back and just tell them how horribly, sorely missed they were, but just kidding, they were.
Okay, Pat Cadell.
You've seen Pat Cadell on television.
He used to be on MSNB slot, NBC.
Now he's on Fox.
He's a former pollster for Jimmy Carter.
If you've never known that, Cadell really came to everybody's attention as one of the ranking members of the Jimmy Carter entourage.
He was on Cavuto yesterday afternoon on the Fox News channel, and they had a guest host, Chris Cotter.
They talked to Cadell and talking about Obama and the debt negotiations.
Cadell volunteered this.
There's an elephant in the room, and it's time to say it.
There is a whiff of this guy now I saw it Friday in which the question, I lived through this with President Carter, in which you start asking, does this guy have any idea what he's doing?
We said from the get-go, this is the second term of Jimmy Carter.
When the BAMST was immulated, we predicted, okay, here we go.
We've got Jimmy Carter's second term.
Here's Cadell.
Does this guy know what he's doing?
Oh, we've got it here.
Audio Soundbite 23 and 24.
You got to hear these two things.
This is the, it's a preview.
CBS CV News anchor Scott Pelley talking with Obama.
They're going to air it tonight.
Scott Pelley said, can you tell the folks at home that no matter what happens, social security checks are going to go out on August 3rd?
Remember, Mr. President, Ramadan is August 1st.
There are about $20 billion worth of Social Security checks that have to go out the day after the government is supposed to go into defaults.
Well, this is not just a matter of Social Security checks.
These are veterans' checks.
These are folks on disability and their checks.
There are about 70 million checks that go out.
Can you guarantee as president those checks will go out on August the 3rd?
I cannot guarantee that those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved this issue.
Because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.
That's an out and out lie.
And if I didn't know better, I would say the White House gave Scott Pelley a script.
If I didn't know better, I would say Scott Pelley, new to the job, shows up and they handed him the script for this interview.
That question is such a softball setup.
Can you guarantee as president those checks will go out?
I can't guarantee those checks will go out if we have it.
They will go out.
Social security is not about, it's not part of this debt limit talk.
It's not default.
They don't, there's not enough time. folks to change the code in the Social Security computer system to have the checks not go out.
Do you hear the most frightening part of the answer is that if you read, we don't have this on the soundbite, but the whole answer is the president says the government sends out about 70 million checks.
70 million checks.
Can you imagine having to reconcile that every month?
Guarantee you they're not using Quicken, which, by the way, is not being upgraded for Mac OS 10 Lion.
Sorry for being distracted.
This is an outrage here because this is not true.
And this is, my God, it is the playbook.
Hold senior citizens and military people hostages.
It's not just the Social Security checks.
It's veterans checks.
It's right out of the playbook.
I mean, it's just, I've been hearing this 45 years, ever since I was 15.
So after this, it was time for Mr. Claire Shipman to hold the press briefing at the White House.
And the AP correspondent, Ben Feller, says, I'd like to get your reaction to something the speaker said today, which he said the debt limit increase is the president's problem and that President Obama has to put forward a plan that Congress can pass.
What's your reaction to that?
The president doesn't have a vote in this.
It's Congress that has to act.
The president didn't stand up here yesterday and say, hey, show you a lot of charts and graphs about how previous Congresses under a Republican president accumulated enormous amounts of deficits and debt and that this is what they needed to vote to deal with.
And it wasn't his problem.
He didn't say that because he doesn't believe that.
He believes it's his responsibility as the president of the United States to lead, to work with Congress, to resolve these issues together for the American people.
If he doesn't have a vote, why are we even meeting with him?
Would somebody explain what Carney means here?
I'll tell you what the president's vote is, is his signature for crying out does have a vote.
What is this?
So here we have the lie about Social Security and military checks not going out two days after Ramadan.
Now we've got Jay Carney saying the president doesn't have a vote.
Well, the obvious reaction is, why is anybody talking to him then?
Why does what he think matters?
Why are they going up to the White House to talk about this?
He can veto any debt limit bill he wants or he can vote for it.
He's got to sign any new debt limit law that they pass.
He's got to sign it.
And he's been threatening to veto anything without tax increases.
That's his vote.
My God, these people are insulting us like never before.
One more Pat Cadell.
Going back now to audio soundbite number five.
After Cadell said, my God, the big elephant in the room here is we've seen this before.
Does this guy have any idea what he's doing?
I got watching Jimmy Carter.
So Chris Cotton and the host said, well, both sides are firmly entrenched.
Whether they voted Republican or Democrat, didn't the American people vote for those they thought could build consensus?
What kind of question is that?
They think they're the only option for America.
The frustration that's going on in this country, a sense that the mainstream of this country has against both parties in Washington and their failure, they are opening the door to another answer.
And I just want to tell people: if you think in 1992, conditions producer Ross Perot, who at one time was leading the race, in fact would have won if he hadn't announced he was insane during the campaign, the conditions they are much, much worse.
And somebody who can draw from both parties, these political parties are going to get threatened.
Here's a third party talking, which I don't like.
Did Perot announce he was insane?
Yeah, I don't think he actually announced it.
Cadell might have heard something that confused him about that.
Okay, we're back.
Great to have you along.
Rush Limbaugh and the most listened to radio talk show in America.
You know, we were back in February talking about another government shutdown.
You may have forgotten it, folks, but we were.
And on Tuesday, February 15th, Obama said in a press conference, if there's a government shutdown, people don't get their Social Security checks and the military doesn't get its checks.
They use this during every crisis of this kind.
Here's Obama.
I think people should be careful about being too loose in terms of talking about a government shutdown because this is not an abstraction.
People don't get their Social Security checks.
They don't get their veterans' payments.
And he said it again today in an interview with Scott Pelley.
This is how this plan unfolds every time.
There's nothing new in the way the Democrats conduct economic terrorism, holding a gun to the heads of seasoned citizens and our brave military veterans.
Pat Cadell says we've been near done now, Jimmy Carter.
And we have.
It is really stunning.
You go back and relive history and see how almost precisely it repeats itself.
Two soundbites.
This is again this Obama yesterday telling us that we've got to shape up and eat our peas.
It's not going to get easier.
It's going to get harder.
So we might as well do it now.
Pull off the band-aid.
Eat our peas.
April 18th, 1977, at the White House, Jimmy Carter addressing the nation about his proposed energy policy.
Tonight, I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history.
I'm sure that each of you will find something you don't like about the specifics of our proposal.
It will demand that we make sacrifices and changes in every life.
To some degree, the sacrifices will be painful, but so is any meaningful sacrifice.
It will lead to some higher costs and to some greater inconvenience for everyone.
That's what Democrats offer.
Sacrifice.
We've heard all of this before.
It's called liberalism, ladies and gentlemen.
Socialism, totalitarianism.
Pat Cadell wrote that speech for Carter.
More than likely.
More than likely, Pat Caddell wrote it or at least approved it before Carter gave it.
Pat Cadell has since seen the light.
And this, we can't ever forget.
I still think that Boehner ought to take this soundbite, put it on his iPod, take it up there, and play it for Obama every day they meet on the debt ceiling.
This is from last December, Obama talking about why we can't raise taxes.
The American people didn't send us here to wage symbolic battles or win symbolic victories.
They would much rather have the comfort of knowing that when they opened their first paycheck on January of 2011, it won't be smaller than it was before, all because Washington decided they preferred to have a fight and failed to act.
Make no mistake.
Allowing taxes to go up on all Americans would have raised taxes by $3,000 for a typical American family.
And that could cost our economy well over a million jobs.
Now, one other thing about this, these are the Bush tax rates that he's talking about, making sure that we did not raise them or actually get rid of them.
Now, we were told for years and years and years the Bush tax cuts were only for the rich, right?
Look at this.
Obama says, make no mistake, allowing taxes to go up on all Americans would have raised taxes by $3,000 for a typical American family last December.
And it's worse now than it was then.
Obama admits the Bush tax cuts affected everybody, not just the rich.
What's changed, ladies and gentlemen?
I ask you, what has changed other than things have gotten worse?
What has changed?
Why now is raising taxes an average of $3,000 for a typical family?
Why is that a must?
Back to the phones we go.
Ralph in Buford, South Carolina.
Nice to have you on the program, Ralph.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
How are you?
Good.
Longtime listener, first time caller.
Thank you, sir.
I want to say on point with Jeff M. Elt, CEO of GE.
I don't know why he can get up there and no one takes him to task about he shuts plants in Rochester, New York, you know, the light bulb plants.
Yeah.
He moved them to China.
He's on Obama's committee on how to save jobs and make America better.
Private sector jobs, creating private sector.
He's a reason.
He has on that commission.
Yeah, he's on this commission and no one takes him to task there.
Sits there, yucks it up with the president about shovel ready, which was absolutely pathetic, not only from ML, but from the President of the United States, yucking it up about shovel ready wasn't shovel ready.
Right.
So not only does he spend money on this thing, he doesn't create one job.
I know.
Well, we took him to task the first hour.
I've told a friend of mine in an email, Millennium Gumster, I'm surprised I'm actually still alive.
We pointed this out profoundly, by the way, in every which way possible, two or three different times.
So he is being held account, at least here.
Look at this headline from Reuters.
This is...
You realize when you read this that they're serious.
Billions of bugs wiped out on Dutch roads.
Dutch motorists kill 133 billion important insects a month, splattering them on their windshields and headlights.
They're important members of the food chain.
▲
Export Selection